Slashdot Mirror


Corporate Work in the US vs. Canada?

No One You Know asks: "I've been working as a sysadmin for an insurance company in the US for the past six years, and have decided to move to Canada. I've had it with corporate America, but I'm trying to keep an open mind while job hunting. How does Canadian corporate life compare to that of the US?"

1,309 comments

  1. Speaking as a Canadian... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you'd better like back bacon. That's all I should have to tell you.

    1. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that what you call Canadian bacon?

    2. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by still_sick · · Score: 5, Funny

      All you need to know about Canada : Less Handguns, More Beavers.

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    3. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by jamonterrell · · Score: 2, Funny

      listen to this guy he knows what he's talking aboot

      --
      I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    4. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by ThomK · · Score: 1

      Actually Canadian bacon is called "peameal".

      --

      TK

    5. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by rikkards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always called it Back Bacon.
      (Living in Ottawa)
      My take on Corporate life: Probably the same but good luck finding a job here. Only place hiring is the government but if you speak English and little or no French you are out of luck. Speak French and little or no English and you are in like Flynn.

    6. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by hemp · · Score: 1

      More Cheese-Fries!!!!

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    7. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by antarctican · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course if you are American, definitely stay down there, you won't like it up here and we won't like you (unless you go hang out with the rednecks in Alberta, but I don't consider them very Canadian, private healthcare, ha, that's not the Canadian way, they should move south)

      Err, before I get marked flamebait.... that "If you are American" obviously is a typo, it should read, "if you are Republican" Oops.

    8. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      Poutine... ahhhh mmmm.... the poutine!

    9. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      you don't like America's attitude, change it. By leaving you're just going to increase the asshole quotiant down south, the number of "true blood americans" or whatever those conservative capitalist types like to call themselves.


      Sounds like he couldn't do anything to decrease the asshole quotiant up north though, you seem to be all full up.

    10. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by provolt · · Score: 5, Funny

      And you better get working on the massive inferiority complex.

    11. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      Albertan's are not american. Silly Easterners thinking just because we are not exactly the same as them we must be american

    12. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many of you wear ten-fucking-gallon hats!

    13. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by antarctican · · Score: 0

      Umm, actually I say that as a British Columbian.... I feel more in common with the Maritimes then with Alberta... you and your wacky right wing premier.... unfortunately we have one right now too. But only for one more year!

    14. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anyone care if their leader is right wing or left wing or center. Regardless, they're all dicks and they all end up fucking up everything they touch. It's an odd thing around here to have a party take power and actually fix shit without bunging up something else beyond repair in the process.

    15. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      I always called it Back Bacon. (Living in Ottawa)

      Thats because you live in CANADA

      We don't call it AMERICAN FOOTBALL in this country, even though thats what the rest of the world calls it...

      On Topic

      If this guy isn't interested in corporate life, he should find a small company, or start one of his own. The vast majority of jobs in the US are for small companies, after all. Moving to Canada wont change all that much.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    16. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry getting back to the question asked, why the heck do you want to leave America to go to Canada?

      Not all corporations are the same. You might also look at smaller business where the relationship is more personalized. You tend to get much better treatment.

    17. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by schapman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HAHA cause the NDP spending all our money was so much better for the province than a Premier who is cutting back on overpaid union workers

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    18. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no... you've got it all wrong. You need to highlight your Americancy by throwing in some of your own country's words:

      Well shizzle my nizzle, but y'all better listen to this guy as y'aint from around here... he knows what he's talking aboot, uh-huh. Fo' True, a-yup, that'll learn ya's. Y'all come back now, y'hear?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    19. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by datababe72 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Tell me who got the better treatment.

      Off-topic and feeding the trolls, but I don't care. I'm sick of this argument.

      Two wrongs don't make a right.
      Do unto others as you would have them do to you.

      Geez. We learned this stuff in preschool.

      And yes, I am an American. And I'm staying here to vote against the people who think like you.

    20. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by lightsaber1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      1) It was Alan Greenspan that caused the economy to tank...he did it because it was out of control. Ideally the fall would have been controlled, but a certain president *ahem* Bush *ahem* managed to do everything in his power to counteract any and all of Greenspan's efforts to slow the fall. The same thing happened in the early '90s and the mid '80s -- it's called a counter-cyclical monetary policy

      2) David Dodge did same thing here in Canada, and, for the first time ever was successful in controlling it where you Americans failed -- there was no recession.

      3) Just because the Iraqis do it to you doesn't make it right to do it to them

      4) On topic, I really have no basis for comparison, but having grown up and now going to school and working in Canada, I don't think I could possibly want to be anywhere else. The only real downsides are there are only 10 stat holidays in the year, there is a slightly higher tax rate (but that goes to pay for health care among a lot of other government programs), and if you commute, driving through snowstorms sucks -- but it doesn't snow everywhere...B.C. hardly gets any.

    21. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by _J_ · · Score: 1

      Which is ironic; Alberta spends more per person than any other province. I guess they follow the Bush school of fiscal prudence. Mind you, they can afford it.

      J:)

    22. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Spudnik · · Score: 1

      Obviously from Ontario, there are more rednecks in northern ontario, as opposed to the metrosexual south!

    23. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by fred911 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "The U.S. was in great shape DUE to Clinton". Isn't close. The U.S. was in great shape in Clinton's presidency due to Regan's economic policy. Bush now has Clinton's economic policy to clean up.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    24. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by MicktheMech · · Score: 1

      What do you expect when your representation out here is Reform? Or as I like to call them, Republicans North.

    25. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Some_Llama · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually...there was a documentary by Michael Moore called "Bowling for columbine", one of the points in the movie was why we had more gun violence than canada and he broke down the points most people make (More violence on US TV, more guns in US, etc..) and these points were basically false (as he proved one by one), for the most part US and Canada have the same number of gun ownerships per person....

    26. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Thats pure conjecture. Read Keynes not Smith. Smith was a lunatic like Marx. Keynes is the real economist.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    27. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, if you like marijuana...

      $weight = "28 grams";
      if ($bag ne $weight) {
      print "No trouble";
      }

      (at least in s. Ontario)

      hehe

    28. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The U.S. was in great shape in Clinton's presidency due to Regan's economic policy. Bush now has Clinton's economic policy to clean up."

      And Kerry will be in great shape cause of Bush's economic policies, right?

    29. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mod parent up funny. That is some funny shit.

      If 8 years of Clinton is to blame for our current mess, who do we blame for the lousy economy under the first Bush? Clinton wasn't President yet.

      Unemployment and tax policy [registration, sorry]

      Mod me down, offtopic, I guess.

    30. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the U.S. has way more guns than Canada, even per capita. Something like 0.25 for Canada and 0.82 for the U.S. We kick their ass when it comes to gun ownership. I got those numbers from some Canadian gun control site, but they are probably accurate.

    31. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      Carter of course! And he inherited the lousy economy of ... Johnson. Of course this all breaks down with Eisenhower - he inherited the economy or Roosevelt!

    32. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. We have 1 gun for every three canadians or 10 million firearms. A higher per capita percentage than the US. Knives were the most popular muder weapon here last year though. They're are more gun regulations here but they're not oulawed (I have a 357 and a bushmaster in a safe in the basement for example). Definetely no concealed weapon permits!

    33. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by jwsmith00 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Less guns, more hockey violence. Like really, how many hockey players have been charged in the last 3 months?

    34. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by BrianMarshall · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ... and people don't ask you what church you belong to or try to get you to come to theirs.

      Actually, we do get a few Jehovah's Witnesses and a small proportion of enthusiastic (generally born again) Christians, but there is no overall cultural pressure for this sort of thing.

      --
      "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -- HST
    35. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad how many dorks believe that the state of things in one presidency occurred because of actions taken during that same presidency. Not only that, it's futile to even argue that one presidency can change things that much.

      News flash: most of the state of one presidency is caused by events that took place in the previous presidency.

      Ex: Remind me of which fiscal policies the Clinton Administration used to propel the dot-com bubble? None? That's right, it was propelled by technology. Tell me which fiscal policies the Bush administration could have used to prevent the dot-com crash? Oh! That's right, still none. That was caused by dumbasses investing large sums of money into dubious business plans.

      The best any presidency can do is to practice efficiency and fiscal responsibility. There is no way to claim that any presidency has done that in at least the past twenty years. Clinton got lucky: the boom of the dot-com era provided the financing for that fat-assed entitlement budget he got year after year. Bush is equally stupid for not taking the dot-com crash into consideration into his budget: he needs to realize there is far less income for the government to take and work with.

      In short: your whole post is stupid, as is your attitude regarding politics and leadership. Think about it for more than the 2.6 seconds it takes to jerk your knee and maybe you'll realize that the complex issues that face our country (or any country, for that matter) cannot be solved by any of the administrations in recent history.

    36. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by gremlins · · Score: 1

      Yeah because they use clubs for the babie seals

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    37. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Speak French and little or no English and you are in like Flynn.
      Bullshit! They just don't hire. Period.
    38. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course two wrongs don't make a right. He wasn't claiming that. But there is a significant moral distinction between embarassing people by stripping them nude and pointing at their genitiles, and decapitating them with a 12" bowie knife. Both are wrong and should be shunned, but, unlike Nicholas Berg, at least the Iraqi prisoners are still breathing.

      Our leaders have apologized and are working to correct the abuses in that prison. Now when is somebody going to apologize to us for killing 3000 people on September 11, or for burning and dismembering 4 US contract workers in Falluja, or cutting off this guys head?

    39. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by No+One+You+Know · · Score: 1

      I should say that I do like backbacon. After all, I run a Bob and Doug McKenzie web site. And no, the irony of all this is not beyond me :-)

    40. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are correct, but the biggest difference is in the number of handguns. America has about 9-10 times the population of Canada, but in that chart 63 times the number of handguns. You can get rifles fairly easy here (hunting), but handguns and now bullets (for any gun) are harder to get here than in the US.

      I've always been of the opinion that there are more guns in a major US city (say New York or LA) than there are in all of Canada.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    41. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When are we going to apologize for being such an arrogant greedy fucking empire that we seek out third world counries, arm them, then bomb the shit out of them, for the benefit of corporate greed and nothing else?

      Patriotism is called loving your country, not being a blind ideologue when rednecks go wrong.

    42. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by HuguesT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hello AC,

      > at least the the Iraqi prisoners are still breathing

      1- Some Iraqis were in fact killed in those prisons, 25 of them according to local newspapers. Were their death nice and peaceful? We don't know yet. The female private we saw in all the pictures was interviewed yesterday and said worse abuse was committed than the one we saw. She didn't give specifics.

      2- Spoken as a true westerner. Some of the victims interviewed on TV said they'd rather have been killed. Interview of people in the Iraqi street I saw this morning was saying that forcing people to have simulated sex was in fact far worse than killing them.

      To the victims it does make a difference that they are still alive. In terms of outrage in the Arab world it couldn't be worse. See how much coverage the death of 10s of thousands of civilians in the Iraq pacification campaign has had, and how much coverage this is generating.

      It should be painfully obvious that we are getting a war of civilizations.

    43. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can't resist, sorry

      > Now when is somebody going to apologize to us for
      > killing 3000 people on September 11

      What does Iraq have to do with this? None of the terrorist were Iraqis or had any contact with Iraq.

      > or for burning and dismembering 4 US contract
      > workers in Falluja, or cutting off this guys
      head?

      These are the work of terrorists, are you saying that the US should behave like terrorists? Can't you see that violence generates violence?

    44. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm glad that someone else understands that the stripping nude thing was much more significant than most people think. This was not simply about stripping them naked and embarassing them. It was about humiliating and degrading them in the worst way they could come up with. They took a cultural perspective and found the worst acts they could perform on them to break them down psychologically.

      This was psychological torture. It was not simply pointing at their genitals. Besides, as noted above, prisoners WERE killed. Dogs were set loose on them while they were defenseless. It is much easier for Westerners to empathize with Nicholas Berg, because you can relate to him. Hell, even if we knew the NAMES of the Iraqi prisoners, many of us probably wouldn't be able to even pronounce them properly. A human life is a human life, and lives are being taken on every side. There isn't much of a better or worse at this point.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    45. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ...as for Canada's "inferiority complex", I'd just like to inform our USAian neighbours, that inspite of what Oprah winfrey tells you, not all criticism is born of insecurity.

      Canada *dosnt have* an "inferitority complex" as much as USAians are incapable of seeing us WITHOUT *their* Superiority Complex -- get it? The USAians are projecting... and it speaks more to your hubris than our opinion of the world -- get it?

    46. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by GCP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. Maybe you could climb back down off of your desk, take a deep breath, and explain how you might react if you actually DID have an inferiority complex.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    47. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by random+coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh and lower wages/standard of living, but don't worry there is the higher crime rate to make up for it. Don't insult any designated victim group either or you can be arrested for "hate speech." Of course the socialized medicine is good, except when you need surgery or have cancer. Other than that nice place, but cold climate.

    48. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by gothzilla · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Reagan did start some good policies with economics. Clinton, after 8 years, left office with a $500 billion surplus. In 2 years, the 2nd bush brought us to a $500 billion deficit. If bush can screw a surplus so badly in 2 years, then clinton did an awesome job to leave us with a surplus after 8 years. During clintons reign, jobs weren't hard to find (talking about ALL jobs, not just tech jobs). Now they are. That speaks volumes to me on who screwed the economy more than anything.

    49. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Uh... don't you mean:

      Connerie. Ils simplement n'emploient pas. Période.

      ???

      I was originally thinking merde du taureau, but the fish convinced me there was a better way.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    50. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the people I know want Klein out, so hopefully he will go next election.

    51. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 gun per three canadians?

      *does some math*

      Who wants to take over canada?

    52. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't really like the stuff and rarely even notice it in stores. Maybe its more of an Eastern thing. Regular bacon and pancakes with real maple syrup on them is a much nicer breakfast.

    53. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Two wrongs don't make a right.

      It usually takes three or four.

      Do unto others as you would have them do to you.

      No, do unto others as they do unto you.

      Geez. We learned this stuff in preschool.

      Yes, that's about the level of vacuous idealism of these ideas.

    54. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      It was Alan Greenspan that caused the economy to tank...he did it because it was out of control. Ideally the fall would have been controlled, but a certain president *ahem* Bush *ahem* managed to do everything in his power to counteract any and all of Greenspan's efforts to slow the fall. The same thing happened in the early '90s and the mid '80s -- it's called a counter-cyclical monetary policy

      I think it was the huge pump-up of a bubble that caused all of the problems. Gee, that happened during a different president's watch.

      David Dodge did same thing here in Canada, and, for the first time ever was successful in controlling it where you Americans failed -- there was no recession.

      Few people would believe this, especially Canadians, but Canada has the best-managed economy in the world.

      there is a slightly higher tax rate (but that goes to pay for health care among a lot of other government programs)

      The thing that bugs me about taxes is that 1/3 of it doesn't even get spent on social programs or whatnot; it's spent to pay interest on the public debt. It vanishes into thin air. Of course, this is true of any government.

    55. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada has MORE guns per person than the USA. not sure about the distinction between handguns and other guns. But they have lots of guns and none of the problems we do related to them; in fact they are a good argument for the NRA in defending rights. believe it or not.

    56. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Yep, canada is a nation of hunters, every man in my family owns a rifle and kills (and eats) deer during hunting season.

      Not to mention that we watch exactly the same damn TV in canada as in the US. So TV violence & gun ownership cannot possibly be the reason that the US is so bad for gun deaths.

    57. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by beakburke · · Score: 1

      You've "always been of that opinion" huh. Funny how that is not reassuring as facts are :). I won't argue with data though. I think the biggest difference is cultural, as evidenced by all the posts here.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    58. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by rakslice · · Score: 1

      > B.C. hardly gets any.

      And if you believe that, I've got some land I can sell you in Florida, reeeal cheap! =)

    59. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like moral superiority. For the most part, Canadians consider ourselves morally and intellectually superior to Americans. There's a lot of international support for that point of view, even among Americans. Unlike most other countries though, we don't hate Americans. We don't like you, but we will tolerate you. At least until the first attempt at "American wit", then you'll get jumped, jersied, and roughed up in a well lit parking lot someplace by a group of hockey fans, and deported to your country of origin.

    60. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      I always called it Back Bacon. (Living in Ottawa)
      Thats because you live in CANADA

      We don't call it AMERICAN FOOTBALL in this country, even though thats what the rest of the world calls it...

      Yeah, but in Canada we just say "football" to refer to either Canadian football or American football. (And then disambiguate by naming the league.)

      The thing that puzzles us is that this so called "Canadian bacon" is not something that a Canadian would normally eat, except maybe on a pizza (in which case we call it Canadian bacon as well). What we call bacon is the same thing you call bacon. Tom Green once appeared on the Tonight show drunk and covered in bacon to protest this fact.

      -a

    61. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by JasonAWallwork · · Score: 1

      You do know that most hockey players are American, right?

    62. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Hah. I spit on your poutine. There is but one true way to eat your fries, and that's with chili and cheese. Lousy hosers can't get anything right.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    63. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Who told you that? King Ralph? Manitoba has been the biggest spender for a long time.

    64. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by imbezol · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Canada all my life and only seen back bacon twice.

    65. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      The Reform Party was called the The Canadian Alliance for a few years. For a brief period they were known as The Canadian Reform Alliance Party, until it was realized that it would appear on the ballot as CRAP ;) But last year they merged with the Conservative party, so there is no Reform or CRAP anymore.

    66. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're tarring with a pretty broad brush there, buddy. Believe it or not, there are at least two or three Americans who don't eat Canadian children for breakfast every morning.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    67. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Keep in mind the difference between saying "ratio of gun owners to to total population" versus "number of guns per person". Consider the case where you have five people, four of whom don't own a gun, but the fifth person owns four guns by himself. Then the guns per capita is 4/5, but the gun owners rate is only 1/5.

      In the U.S. it's common for a gun owner to own multiple guns. This might be throwing off that number immensely if what you're actually interested in is seeing how common gun ownership is.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    68. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Carpet · · Score: 1

      Economic policy takes time to put into effect, and thus is usually thought out quite a few years in advance. When you're thinking economic policy, you don't plan for NOW, you plan for what happens a few years from now, and impliment policy accordingly.

      Therefore, while Greenspan may have planned during the Clinton years, by the time the policy was put into effect Bush was in the White House. Unfortunately, the policies Bush favours tend to 1) Counteract Greenspan's policies and 2) Are quick and dirty fixes rather than long term policies.

    69. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If you are going to criticize someone seriously, you might want to use your name.

      Anyway, the goverment DOES have an impact. It's not as large as some think but it does have an impact. Starting a war, for example, will definitely impact the economy. Similarly, running a massive deficit will impact the economy. The decline in the US$ can be directly attributed to Bush's deficit. And so on.

      In addition, the Federal Reserve, which although independent, is influenced by the government policies. This will definitely have an impact. Adjusting interest rates definitely impacts the economy--every capitalist says so!

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    70. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think one of the major points that Michael Moore was trying to get across, is that American's have more gun violence because of fear. Even though murders have been going down, reporting it has gone up. If you live in Canada, it's easy to detach, and say it's happening somewhere else, when watching american news, but it's probably harder for americans to do this i imagine. IANAA (i am not an american)

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    71. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you are forgetting that Michael Moore is a complete idiot.

    72. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1

      Canadians still make up a majority of NHL players.

    73. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1

      Still seems to be plenty of crap being thrown around...

    74. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we were "an arrogant greedy fucking empire" then we would actually be building a empire not unlike the Romans or Greeks before them. We could easily take control of our hemisphere but we don't. We have some influence with our neighbors and other countries but, we are not an empire.

    75. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Kombat · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually...there was a documentary by Michael Moore called "Bowling for columbine",

      I'm gonna stop you right there, because, well, Michael Moore is a partisan, sensationalistic idiot. Also, you misspelled "fictional comedy" in your quote above - I highlighted the misspelling for you.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    76. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Oh and lower wages

      Myth. Wages are on par when you take into consideration the health insurance an American pays (after tax) that is rolled into our socialized medicare system (pre-tax).

      standard of living

      Myth. Standard of living is comparable.

      higher crime rate

      OUTRIGHT LIE. Not sure what else to say - this is simply factually, demonstrably false. Canada's crime right is dramatically lower than the US's.

      Don't insult any designated victim group either or you can be arrested for "hate speech."

      Myth. The "Hate Speech" laws deal strictly with advocating explicit violence against visible minorities and (as of this year) gays.

      socialized medicine is good, except when you need surgery or have cancer.

      It works a helluvalot better than in the states, unless you're in the wealthiest 20% who can afford top-of-the-line private healthcare. Or are you forgetting that not everyone is rich? Its easy to forget about all those homeless people you have, eh? I mean, they're all tucked away on those street corners, and after a lifetime of ignoring them, you probably just plain forget they're there, right?

      cold climate.

      Depends on your definition of "cold," I guess. I'm in Ontario, and the high for today is 28 degrees Celcius (82 degrees Farenheit).

      While I'm posting, I'd just like to point out that not only does Canada have a far, far lower murder rate than the US, but that of the 2 or 3 hundred gun deaths we have nationwide every year, 80% of all gun deaths in Canada are suicides. That's pretty interesting, don't you think? If 5 people show up in a Canadian morgue, dead of gunshot wounds, 4 of them did it to themselves and committed suicide.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    77. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, by B.C., I meant Vancouver....it truly was shortsighted of me and I realized my mistake right after hitting submit. However, compared to, say, Newfoundland, Vancouver truly does get hardly any snow.

    78. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who? *I* sure don't know any...

    79. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived in Canada for 35 year and the only time I've ever heard of Canadian back bacon is on American TV.

      But we do like to eat beavers.

    80. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really fear, as much as the fact that we Americans are violent bastards. The majority of murders in America are committed by people who know each other - family, friends, gang members, etc. And the numbers go up during the summer and around holidays. Those are the times that we are more likely to be around those same people and more likely to be drunk. The fact it is reported or not has little to do with it. We've always behaved like this - back to our beginnings even. We're offended that Janet would show her boob but not at watching some idiot in a wifebeater slap his wife around on Cops.

      The failure of media is that their reporting hides the true nature of the common murders here. The media generally reports on the unusual - mass murders, serial killings, random killings, or school/work related ones. They could generally care less that Carl shot his cousin Bubba at the family picnic after having a few too many beers. Or Bob shot his ex-girlfriend. But those are the majority of murders.

    81. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Unkle · · Score: 1

      the health insurance an American pays (after tax) I don't know about all of America, but my health insurance payments are taken out of my paycheck PRE tax, both state and federal, IIRC. Plus, I have a medical reembursement account where my employer (or, rather, benefits coordination company) takes money out of my paycheck, again pre-tax, and I can get that money back for medical expenses, so it is basically untaxed.

      --
      Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
    82. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by jrutley · · Score: 1

      I would say that it's the $1000000000+ Gun Control legislation that made the difference. :P~~~

    83. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by KGIS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wages are on par when you take into consideration the health insurance an American pays (after tax) that is rolled into our socialized medicare system (pre-tax). I would have to disagree with this. If I would take the difference in the taxes in Canada and the US and use it to purchase health care/health insurance I would get much higher level of care in the US. Now, if I was working for minimum wage it would probably be a completely different story altogether.

    84. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Maybe they moved to Canada. Splitters!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    85. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by CosmicDreams · · Score: 1

      2- Spoken as a true westerner. Some of the victims interviewed on TV said they'd rather have been killed. Interview of people in the Iraqi street I saw this morning was saying that forcing people to have simulated sex was in fact far worse than killing them.

      The emphasis is mine. What exactly is your idea of "western" thinking. I happen to live in the U.S. Am I a typical "westerner". I can tell you that the people who are trying to excuse the prison abuse are not conservatives, but republicans trying to dodge this political bullet. The people who are owning up to and looking for the best solution are the conservatives (who are trying to conserve the pricipal of humane treatment for thy enemy) and the liberals (who are fighting for the rule of law worldwide).

      The definition of western thought that you portray is an advocacy and/or excusement of the abuse of prisoners for the aquisition of intel. While this thinking is not unamerican (aka. Michael Savage), it does more to expose your assumed steroetypes of America than it describes what the majority of Americas thinks.

      Who can possibly say that, all Americans share any particular opinion when we are installed with the right to disagree, the right to voice our disagreement, and use those rights as much as possible. But I think that most of agree that Saddam was a Tyrant and a murderer and that his removal, in itself, is a good thing. Now we have to do our best to give the Iragis their country back.

      --
      Go Gusties
    86. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Kombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I would take the difference in the taxes in Canada and the US and use it to purchase health care/health insurance I would get much higher level of care in the US.

      Are you sure about this? Have you lived in both countries? Neither have I, but I've read testimonials from several Slashdotters who have, and they say they couldn't find any actual difference in quality, and suggested it was merely propaganda perpetuated by the private care providers in the US (sorry for the inadvertant alliteration) to justify their profiteering (oops!). Can you back up your accusation?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    87. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Curtman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but nowadays that all comes from the Liberal party.

    88. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Gkeeper80 · · Score: 1

      What part of his movie was fictional? I can agree with you that it was certainly partisan and maybe even outright biased, but fictional? If I'm mistaken about this I'd really like to know what facts were missrepresented.

    89. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by mofochickamo · · Score: 1
      I can't read this without commenting.

      He slashed defense and ran away from every armed conflict around the world. He gave no response to bombings of the USS Cole, the World Trade Center (yes it was previously bombed in an attempt to take it down), Somalia, the US Barracks in Kenya etc, which taught the terrorists they could kill us without response, which of course landed us with September 11.

      • USS Cole - The attack was Oct. 12, 2000. This bombing was staged by suicide bombers, so it is a tad bit difficult to find them after they blow themselves into fish bait. There has been an investigation and arrest of someone who may have been involved in planning of the attack. Also, George W. could have done something about this in Jan 2001 when he took over.
      • World Trade Center Bombing - there was something called a TRIAL and conviction that took place. They are meant to determine innocence or guilt. It is part of what makes America a great place to live. Ask Bush about Guantanamo. BTW, the trial was only on the news about every day for a year, so I don't blame you for not knowing this.
      • Somalia - Dude, didn't you watch Blackhawk Down?
      • US Barracks in Kenya (I'm assuming you meant US embassies) - Again, there was a trial and conviction.
      • which taught the terrorists they could kill us without response, which of course landed us with September 11 - Since there WAS a response to every single action you listed, I'll simply address your "of course landed us with Sep 11" as more stupidity. How can you singly blame a single individual who wasn't even in office for 9 months when the act occurred? The acts of Sep 11 were committed by TERRORISTS and we (America) didn't stop it.

      He took a great economy handed to him and tanked it in his final 2 years. Pahleease. Don't you remember the recession were we in when George Bush Sr. was in office? Presidents don't affect the economy as much as people give them credit for.

      Now let me address the last point, about the prisoner abuse and beheading of Nick Berg. I watched the video of Nick Berg being beheaded. It was slow and brutal. It was an innocent man being beheaded by other selfish men who used him as a pawn in their game. The beheading was meant to be horrible and cause terror. It was much worse than the prisoner abuse we have seen. HOWEVER, the people who beheaded Nick Berg were terrorists and we are a country that advocates life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We have a constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment. We cannot use the actions of terrorists as justification for our mistakes. The terrorists do not set our moral standards. We do not live by their moral standards. The Iraqi prisoners were not even convicted yet. And, if they had been, they should still have not been treated like they were. Even if you don't agree the treatment was cruel it was certainly unusual. US Soldiers vow to uphold the constitution. The soldiers, commanders, and govt. officials who let this happen on their watch are just as bad as the terrorists who beheaded Nick Berg, because their job is to protect others. Terrorists kill others, so for them to behead someone is in their character.

      Again, the beheading of Nick Berg was much more horrible than any prisoner abuse we have seen, but it is no excuse for our treatment of Iraqi prisoners.

      --
      Honk if you're horny.
    90. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Interesting dialect....South Central Beverly Hillbilly??

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    91. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Kombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What part of his movie was fictional? I'd really like to know what facts were missrepresented.

      Sure, no problem. There are too many to list here, but this page sums it up nicely.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    92. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Oh, we'll gladly say "boulechite"... :) :)

    93. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by datababe72 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I remember correctly, "Do unto others as you would have them do to you" is pretty much what Kant comes up with in his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals.

      They are platitudes for a reason... there is a certain amount of truth in them.

      And frankly, this "they started it" nonsense is also preschool level.

    94. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that there are tales of Iraqi women being raped in these prisons that are beginning to come out. The stigma against rape in Iraq is crazy; some may be killed by their own families in order to save face. WTF?

      Of couse, none of this makes the murder of Berg any more palatable or (as some sick Muslim extremists feel) justified. War really brings the worst out in everybody. *heavy sigh*

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    95. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically...you are an American. The last time I looked at a map, Canada was in North AMERICA!

    96. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by KGIS · · Score: 1

      I've not (yet) lived in both countries but this is something I am researching for a move that is coming up.
      I have talked to more than a few people within my company that have been relocated to/from Canada and the US. Most all of them were software developer/systems analyst/project management types and they all had pretty much had the same opinion. While obviously this was not a sceintific study it did cover people who lived in at least 4 provinces and at least 6 states. For me, that is enough of a sample to make my decision.

      I also grew up not more than 20 miles from the Canada/US border and I know of many people who went to the US for treatment so that they could avoid the waiting lists for treatment in Canada. In terms of the quality of the actual treatment there may not be that much difference. From what I can tell the US facilities generally have newer equipment to work with but the deciding factor for me is not having to wait 6-8 months to find out exactly what is wrong with you because there is a waiting list.

    97. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear is meant to be part of the American experience. We were thrown out of every decent nation on the face of the Earth, and as the mutts of the world, we were meant to live in a tenuous state of Freedom and Fear. I don't trust my government, and I don't trust people who do.

      The Canadians I've spoken with -- and while they're not 100+, it's at least 10+ -- all trust their government. This strikes me as insane, as if somehow they all believed the Earth were flat, too. Why you would trust anybody in a position of power is beyond me, simply beyond me.

      I would hope it's beyond most Americans, too. The Bush administration is rapidly proving otherwise, though.

    98. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by m.h.2 · · Score: 1

      [Myth. Wages are on par when you take into consideration the health insurance an American pays (after tax) that is rolled into our socialized medicare system (pre-tax).]

      Ummmm... Last I checked, my health insurance was a pre-tax expense.

      [socialized medicine is good, except when you need surgery or have cancer.

      It works a helluvalot better than in the states, unless you're in the wealthiest 20% who can afford top-of-the-line private healthcare. Or are you forgetting that not everyone is rich? Its easy to forget about all those homeless people you have, eh? I mean, they're all tucked away on those street corners, and after a lifetime of ignoring them, you probably just plain forget they're there, right?]


      Is that why most of the Canadiens who I know come down to the states for the more critical medical procedures? The original poster was talking about *quality of care*, not cost. Oh, and I've seen plenty of sick homeless people on the streets of Montreal. Just because they are entitled to free health care doesn't mean they use it.

      [80% of all gun deaths in Canada are suicides. That's pretty interesting, don't you think? If 5 people show up in a Canadian morgue, dead of gunshot wounds, 4 of them did it to themselves and committed suicide.]

      Well, that says volumes about the quality of the free mental health care...

    99. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Rupert · · Score: 1

      and it is well known that partisan, sensationalistic idiots never say anything true, even by accident.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    100. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by ravioli_21 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help but respond: I've lived in both Canada and the US. Here's my take on things. 1. Taxes. In Canada, you're overtaxed. For example, when I left Canada to accept a job in the US, I made the same annual salary. The difference was the tax. In Canada, I claimed married with 3 kids on my taxes. When I first moved to the US, I claimed single. Even claiming single, my take home pay was about $300 more per pay period. (every 2 weeks) Once my wife and kids moved down and I changed my tax category to married, that amount increased to about $700 more take home per pay. I also get back around $2000/year in income taxes. (Since you can write off so much more on your income taxes in the US). Sales tax where I live is 6%. In Canada, I used to live in Ontario, the tax was 15% on most everything. Even service. (There is a federal GST which I am including to make up the 15%). Not to mention all of the taxes that they "bake" into goods. (i.e. gas, liquor, cigarettes etc). Property tax. I pay about $1000 for a 2700 Sq ft home with about 1/2 acre of land. My parents pay about $2500 for a 1200 Sq ft (at most) home with a lot that's 20' by 80'. (My home is also worth between $300,000-$400,000 in Canada. I paid around $150,000..Just to give an idea of the difference in home prices) 2. Health Care. I do have a health plan at work so I realize I get better care than those less fortunate. But let's be real, most people in this discussion aren't homeless and would probably have coverage as well. When I went to a hospital in Canada, I'd wait for hours upon hours to be seen. Here, you're in and out exponentially faster. (Plus the quality of care is better). Hell, last time my wife had to go the hospital they kept apologizing because it took about 45 minutes to get her down for an MRI. How many months does it take in Canada these days to get an MRI? (Most people where I lived just go to Buffalo) 3. Schools. Again, depends on where you live, but my kids were learning in grade 7 and 8 what I was learning in grade 10 back in Canada. When my daughter started kindergarten in the US, she was learning to read. My uncles kids were learning to count to 10 back in Canada. 4.Crime. Don't go where you're not supposed to in the big city. Same applies in Canada. (Just look at the trouble in Toronto these days). There's also 10 times as many people in the US. Most goods are cheaper here. (About the only thing I find are more expensive where I'm living are lunch meat and potatoes... :-) ) I think my father-in-law, Mr Anti-American, said it best the first time he came down to visit us. I remember him sitting in the yard and saying "This isn't at all what I expected. This isn't the way it's portrayed in Canada". When I was planning to move down, I had a one year plan. Make enough money to pay off some bills in Canada and get the hell out. I hoped that I could survive the year without getting killed. Well, I loved it so much that I moved my family down and we've been here over 5 years now. Not one of us wants to leave. Anyway, that was long winded, but I wanted to get my experience out there....for what it's worth. Regards Rav

    101. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya know I just got some well deserved kicks for that post mainly because during that rant I left out a very important part and that is to say that I am very upset by how we treated the prisoners in Iraq. There things occur in all wars and all interrogations and we are kidding ourselves if we think they don't however I'd like to believe that we should be above that type of behaviour, and I'm saddened that we obviously aren't. This isn't to paint our entire armed forces with a bad reputation because of the behaviour of certain groups, but perhaps Jack had it right when he said "You can't handle the truth".

      Ok now the rest of this post addresses a number of replies here kind of rolled up into one.

      Now as for the "arrests" in the terrorists plot. Here's what's wrong there. Clinton treated it as a law enforcement issue. You have a network of terrorists who are financed by a lot of governments. It's equivilant to busting the guy on the street selling crack and saying you solved the problem without addressing the supplier.

      Sure Joe Blow might have been the one who planted the bomb and you arrested him, but is he the "responsible party"? No. He's responsible for putting it there sure, and you deal with that, but you then have to go and hunt down the groups of people or governments that sponsored that action and deal with them.

      Canada wants to live in a hole and ignore all of this. Spain wants to cuddle up next to them. After all they just tought the terrorists that if you kill a few of their people that they will run away. Wait until Mulsim Extremists demand that Spain return to Islamic rule because all countries ever occupied by Muslims are required under extreme fundamentalism to be returned that way.

      As for Iraq. They were a large financer of terrorism. Saddam was a huge money launderer. Notice how we're starting to find all sorts of evidence that those countries opposed to the war were actively violating the UN resolutions on selling things to Iraq? Gee there's a surprise. As for WMD's we just recently found some modern Russian Migs burried in the desert that we had walked over many times and had no idea they were there until someone tipped us off. Deserts are great for burying things because in no time at all the evidence of digging is gone. You just have to love sand that way.

      As for staying to vote against people who think like me... Heh :) Ok please do. You're vote counts... Unless of course it doesn't benefit the Democratic party in which case they have no interest in it at all.

      Some realities.

      Tax cuts spur the economy. Fact.
      No country in the world has ever taxed itself into prosperity. Fact
      2 wrongs don't make a right. Fact.
      Letting a bully push you around without responding does not make him go away. Fact.
      Saddam had WMD's. Fact. We know because he used them.

      If they are gone, where did they go. Answer that. Don't feed me "well you haven't found them." Anything can be hidden. Address the issue that they were there, and now the claim is that they aren't. Show the trail of events as to how we went from one side to the other. Nobody can. In the absense of proof that they were destroyed, the only argument left is that they still exist and they have been hidden well enough that we can't find them.

      Oh and one last comment on Iraq and then I'm done here because honestly I love this place and I really should have had more control and not started this debate here, and for that I appologize to you guys and ladies, but this stuff just burns me and I have a tendency to just run off in 20 directions at once.

      Saddam Hussein was actively mudering hundreds of thousands of his own people. People were not safe to openly discuss things, to talk on the phone etc. These forums, this debate could not be held.

      So let me leave you with this if you keep asking why did we go there.

      Think about everything you enjoy. Freedom, being able to persue an education, a job, own a hou

    102. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One last comment.

      I really have no problems with Canadians. They are good people. I just have problems with the people who think they need to go to Canada because the US sucks.

      You have a right to vote, a right to organize etc. Use it. The one person had it exactly right in that you should stay and try and change it.

      I don't happen to agree with the Liberal ideology, but they certainly have a right to persue it and express it. Besides conservatism isn't 100% right either. They have some serous shortcomings as well.

    103. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      I'm gonna stop you right there, because, well, Michael Moore is a partisan, sensationalistic idiot. Also, you misspelled "fictional comedy" in your quote above - I highlighted the misspelling for you.

      Look, there's no question that there were some inaccuracies in his film. Frankly, everything that he says needs to be taken with a grain of salt -- but he does make some interesting points about fear in America (among other things). Taken for what it is (and not who is saying it, and outside of the B.S.), he really makes some interesting, thought-provoking points.

      --

      -Turkey

    104. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including the rest of the coast. Where I live on Vancouver Island we got about three days this year. Back when I was living in Prince Rupert we got over the whole winter three weeks at the most. Which for Rupert was a welcome changed to all the rain it normally gets.

    105. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by tupambao · · Score: 1

      He did get an oscar for his "fictional comedy" under the documentary categorie:

      Best documentary feature "Bowling for Columbine" 2002

    106. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by goatpunch · · Score: 1
      "I think one of the major points that Michael Moore was trying to get across, is that American's [sic] have more gun violence because of fear"

      I felt this was where the film went off the rails. Americans aren't as as frightened and paranoid now as they were between the Second World War and the 60's.

      The bit in Toronto was stupid too- I've seen people who don't lock their houses in some neighbourhoods there, but don't try that in the rest of the country (or even the City).

    107. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Soryy, I didn't mean to be offensive,

      In the Western world we have trouble understanding that sexual abuse of Iraqi men by American women is seen as significantly far worse than the killing of Iraqi or American civilians.

      This is all I meant. The parent was saying, in essense, sure abuses were commited, but the abused people are still alive, whereas an innocent American man has just been beheaded.

      I'm just pointing at the clash of culture.

    108. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (This post will never survive moderation)

      That's OK. The Flamebait moderation didn't survive metamoderation because it was given to supress your opinion, not because what you wrote really deserved it.

    109. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by smithy242 · · Score: 1

      Do visit redeemernews.org. You will find yourself surrounded by a plethora of neoconservative ideals, and a much predictable attack on anything in the right or liberal spectrum. (Although I would stress there is some degree of truth in what they say about Michael Moore's film, but it should equally be taken into the context of the source.) If you want an objective source of statistics, the site www.nationmaster.com has excellent statistics including educational, crime, and economical.

      Good social systems work. I have visited the U.S. numerous times, but nothing was as blatant as the difference between rich and poor. Visited New Orleans for a week, stopped a few places on the way, and it was just unfathomable how different racial minorities were treated and the huge chasm between rich and poor. The only places I have ever felt unsafe have been in the U.S. -- and this is an objective statement, having lived in major centres such as Montreal and Toronto.

      If people could set aside their greed for money and power, even a slight degree, we would see a much more functional society with more contributors.

    110. Re:Speaking as a Canadian... by qwiksilvr · · Score: 1
  2. visa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you just move to Canada... like that? Don't you need a work visa or something?

    1. Re:visa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean 'visum'.

    2. Re:visa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means "permit".

    3. Re:visa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think he means vis-eh?

  3. Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...same as the old boss. Corporate life in Ireland, Germany, Holland, France and here in the US is the same, mostly. I've work at least one year in each of those countries, for local and American corporations. Varying degrees of formality and autonomy, but basically the same crap in different languages.

    1. Re:Meet the new boss by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm just curious; how'd you manage to get all these different jobs? It seems like it might be an interesting way of seeing more of the world outside the US, even if the jobs themselves aren't that great.

      How was living in the different countries? Which were the best and worst places?

    2. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look for small-medium size US companies needing people abroad. The large ones are the hardest to transfer since they have plenty of people that want to travel.

    3. Re:Meet the new boss by OglinTatas · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm just curious; how'd you manage to get all these different jobs?
      He's always been one step ahead of InterPol.

    4. Re:Meet the new boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but basically the same crap in different languages.

      Damn Canadianese.

    5. Re:Meet the new boss by sultanoslack · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have to strongly disagree with this (as an American that's been living and working in Germany for the last two years).

      I can see how one could draw this conclusion after a few weeks in said places, but the gap between American and German work environments may be subtle, but it's very significant.

      • Germans work fewer hours per week and fewer weeks per year. People are encouraged to have a life outside of work and I think this makes for happier employees. (This is also tied with the fact that there's less BS trying to tell you that you jobs should always be fun and fulfilling -- if it's not, well, you've still got a real life.)
      • There's a much stronger emphasis on quality and efficiency, but also more business conservatism. German businesses don't react as quickly to fast emerging trends.
      • Salaries are slightly lower at the bottom and a lot lower at the top compared to the US.
      • German companies tend to be somewhat more bureaucratic.
      • Jobs are harder to find but harder to lose. Job security is much more significant here where after a 6 month evaluation period I have to be given several months notice before I could lose my job and the company has to give a reason that they're willing to stand by in court for firing me.
      • Germans tend to stay at jobs for longer -- especially in the tech sector. People in the US switch jobs rather often on average; in Germany it's common to keep them until retirement.
    6. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Munich for a year, and Frankfurt for three years. That's a bit more than a few weeks -- I also speak good German. All the things you point out are true, but corporate BS is still corporate BS. I'm European, by the way -- not that that makes much difference, as my national corporate culture (Ireland) is quite like the US and less like Germany.

    7. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Thanks for your interest. Okay, this will take a while to explain. I'm an Irish citizen, graduated in 1988, married to an American -- hence visas for EU countries and a green card for the USA were not a problem.

      I worked for three years in Ireland straight out of college. I then joined Molex Corp (whose IT HQ for Europe is in Ireland) to work in Munich, allegedly permanently, but they shut the IT facility there within months of my arrival, and I found myself back in Ireland. But the travel bug had bitten, I'd really enjoyed Munich...

      I pestered my manager to move me back to the mainland as soon as a position opened up, and a year or so later I was working for Molex in Paris. Paris was by far my favourite -- spectacular, friendly colleagues, good pay, amazing city.

      For personal reasons, I had to move back to Ireland again a year later, and regretted leaving France. I regret it to this day. But itchy feet got to me again, and a year later I joined AlliedSignal for a contract position in Frankfurt (Raunheim), and was hired as a permanent employee after a year. Spent three years there, enjoyed it thoroughly. My boss and colleagues were once again great people. After three years, I decided to start working for myself, set up a limited Irish company, and was hired by Bausch & Lomb to work in Hoofddorp, near Amsterdam. I spent two years there, and moved to the US in 1998 as my wife wanted to go back to school to retrain and wanted to do that here in the US.

      Some things helped -- I took five years of German and French in secondary school (highschool), and wasn't too bad at languages. I also targetted large multinational corps with many European branches. I lobbied agressively for those posts when they became available.

      A lot of landing those jobs was down to enthusiasm, a basic understanding of the local language and good tech. experience. Ireland was acting like a little India in the early 90s -- we had tons of IT grads, but not enough positions, and there were shortages of skilled IT people on the mainland, so a lot of Irish ended up working abroad, in Benelux & Germany mainly.

    8. Re:Meet the new boss by kurosawdust · · Score: 1
      He's always been one step ahead of InterPol.

      Well the far more interesting question then is "how the hell does one go about stealing Mount Rushmore?"

      INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW!

    9. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Not true! I was staying one step ahead of the taxman, not the police. ;-)

    10. Re:Meet the new boss by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      "I'm just curious; how'd you manage to get all these different jobs?"

      OK, my list is not as long as the "grandparent's" one, but I lived and worked for 4 years or more in Holland, Singapore and Canada. How to do that, you ask? Simple: resign from your job, sell/throw away half your stuff, buy a plane ticket and there you are, on the airport of an unknown city with no job, no house, no friends, just two suitcases.

      I'm not joking here. It is that simple, it is that hard!! Next step is to write application letters to every recruitment agent you can find in the phonebook, accept any job you can get and later move on to the job you really want. Of course you can try to have a big multinational send you around the globe as an expetriate, but otherwise, just go, have a very hard time the first 6 months and get the reward after that.

      It's simply a matter of choosing between "minimizing risk" or "maximizing experience". Or as we always like to quote Nike: JDI!!!

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    11. Re:Meet the new boss by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Geography is irrelevant. Our struggle for happiness is only about Class.

    12. Re:Meet the new boss by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      I've always thought about this, but what about work visas, immigration etc? I've always fancied England myself, at least to start off with. Any information would be greatly appreciated.

      --
      stuff
    13. Re:Meet the new boss by pyota · · Score: 1

      that seems unecessarily risky to me. much preferable is to get a job with an international company and get an internal transfer; then you get to keep your income and stuff. this page on developing an international career is helpful.

    14. Re:Meet the new boss by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Preferable ... yes (maybe), but most international companies nowadays try to avoid spending 50-100k on relocating someone overseas. And I speak from personal experience in that sense, having worked for a multinational with 300,000 people.

      Further, you will experience more of another country when you are working on local conditions for a local company, etc. The gossip at the expatriate club swimming pool is pretty horrible, I can tell you.

      But yes, it's not the easiest way, but definitely the most rewarding. And you can make your own decisions. If you buy your own ticket, you can decide the destination. If you boss buys it, mmmm.......

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    15. Re:Meet the new boss by Cally · · Score: 1
      All together now...

      "Yeaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!"

      I just bought a Best of the Who just for "Won't Get Fooled Again". 8 1/2 minutes of pure fucking genius.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    16. Re:Meet the new boss by pyota · · Score: 1

      i am currently working abroad on such an assignment and it was not due to high rank or seniority. in the organization i work foreign assignments are fairly commonplace.

      as for expat life, the individual is in complete control of whom and where he associates outside work. i've found that ease of cultural integration is more a function of attitude and effort than local conditions.

    17. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Best... rock... song... ever! Pure fucking genius it is man, those power chords still give me goosebumps!

    18. Re:Meet the new boss by Cally · · Score: 1
      I never understood those still pics of Townshend in mid-windmill but having heard the music properly now at last, I think I get it ;)

      And the first few bars when the drums kick in makes me think there should be a statue of Keith Moon on every High St. Hmmm I wonder if keithmoonisgod.org is taken?

      Incidentally I bought the new Streets album at the same time (variety == spice of life innit!) and this is also very, very good.

      and on a completely unrelated note why did your comment sound like an irish accent in my head before I even saw your nick? weird.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    19. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 1
      I'm a professional "Oirishman", that's why! ;-) I've been told I write like I talk...

      Just read about Streets here online a day or two ago, a Brum who raps about the dole, watching telly and smoking spliffs? Sounds good to me... my brother lives in Watford and emailed me just yesterday recommending it. That's three recommendations in a row, I'll go pick it up.

      Keith Moon's drumming was massive... it always brings images of Vietnam carpet-bombings to mind for some reason.

    20. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Hey Cally, I 've been snooping around your site and read your CV -- you read Psychology in Coleraine? Are you from Norn Iron or GB? Just curious...

    21. Re:Meet the new boss by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Never mind, I answered my own question by checking where you did your O- and A-levels...

    22. Re:Meet the new boss by Cally · · Score: 1

      I just read a nice description of them as "landslide drums" - that catches the feeling quite nicely

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    23. Re:Meet the new boss by Cally · · Score: 1
      oops, that's horribly out of date stuff ;) Yes i was at college in Coleraine but was born in London, grew up in the SE of UK then the west country (Forest of Dean, rather strange & isolated corner on the welsh border.) Oddly enough one of my colleagues here (argh posting at work!) was just hunting for the location of the next customer he's been sent to which turned out to be in Banbridge (south of Belfast) which lead to an orgy of nostalgia as I looked at the multimap view of Portstewart's sand dunes & reminded myself I always wanted to go back there some time. Hmm this year, next year,...

      & incidentally I also have family in Tralee and Dublin, in 1972 500,000 Irish cits left home and half a dozen hippies in a knackered old van headed out to Kerry including my dad's sister & her family.

      right back to looking for exploits for Apache chunked encoding vuln on a MIPS...

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  4. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously for obvious reasons. It's not too bad, but still Dilbert-like. The people I talk to on the phone from here are much more laid back than the Americans, though.

    1. Re:Well... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Let's all go to Uganda to by cheap pills then.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And speeling checkers!

    3. Re:Well... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Just remember, prescription drugs are cheap up north BECAUSE they are expensive here. Or to put it another way, prescription drugs are expensive here because they are cheap up north.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Well... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bullshit. Health care in Canada is as good as it is in the US, except more people (as a percentage of the population) have access to it. If you want to bitch about Canadian taxes (which are higher than in the US, certainly) go for it, but don't repeat stupid propaganda.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Well... by Warlok · · Score: 1

      Health care in both countries have their up- and down-sides. Canadians come to the U.S. for drugs they won't dole out in Canada (and cheap smokes), and American's go to Canada for cheaper drugs that are available (and codeine without a prescription).

      --
      ...and you run and you run and you can't stop what's been done...
    6. Re:Well... by Artful+Codger · · Score: 5, Informative

      The health care is NOT state-provided. Health care is provided by doctors opening practices or groups of doctors running a clinic. Same as the states and elsewhere. The difference is that the government pays the doctor, the user doesn't pay.

      For most people, the government doesn't pay for most drugs, semi-private hospital rooms, physiotherapy, etc. This is where the employer usually contributes. Most companies operating in Canada offer some sort of enhanced health plan to their employees that covers such extras.

      Yeah, we pay more taxes in Canada. And our schools are better, there's less crime, and our inner cities don't look like third-world conflict zones. Go figure.

      As most posters have confirmed, the Canadian office environment is pretty much identical to the US... maybe a bit less hyperactive.

      This is maybe the downside - the Canadian customer is less reactive to high-pressure sales. We're maddeningly slow to cut a deal, and often passive-aggressive when subjected to a high-pressure sales pitch. This drives US salespeople crazy. ;^)

      --

      ... plans that either come to naught, or half a page of scribbled lines...
    7. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why so many Canadians come to the US for anything more serious than the flu right? Because health care in Canada is so great...

    8. Re:Well... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Thats why so many Canadians come to the US for anything more serious than the flu right? Because health care in Canada is so great...

      Cf. "stupid propaganda," above. The "hordes of Canadian health shoppers" meme is an urban legend on a par with Satanic ritual child abuse.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the guy who had to fly to the UK to undergo an MRI and subsequent cancer surgery.

      There was a 9 month wait in Canada for the MRI with no way to pay to bypass it, and his doctors told him if they were right he'd be dead well before that.

      Or tell that to the people who died in ambulances in DOWNTOWN TORONTO because of overloaded ER facilties that were refusing new patients.

    10. Re:Well... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      If you want to bitch about Canadian taxes (which are higher than in the US, certainly) go for it, but don't repeat stupid propaganda.

      If you look at the total tax burden (for all levels of government) as a percentage of GDP, in the USA it's 28% and in Canada it's 35%. This isn't a whopping difference. About 5% of the Canadian tax burden pays for health care. Americans pay about twice as much per captia for health care but that isn't collected as a tax. The other 2% is for things like clearing more snow, etc.

    11. Re:Well... by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Informative
      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    12. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a huge difference! The tax burden is 25% higher in Canada by your figures!

    13. Re:Well... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I have found that as well, I used to work on a helpdesk where we had to liase with people in Dublin in Ireland and some place in America near Washington and there was quite a considerable difference in attitudes.

      Dublin: Would occasionally answer the phone if I left it to ring for 20mins or so and tell me to hang for a bit whilst he finished building this fort in his Age Of Empires game. A 3/4 of an hour conversation would then be had about the best ways of amusing oneself at 3AM ( it was an out of hours helpdesk I was on ). Every 3rd week on full moons they would actually do what we were asking them to do, more often than not they didn't bother.

      Some place near Washington: Phone answered immediately by someone determined to tell me his ( full ) name, job title and department. Even though all I needed to do was give them a case number and tell them to check it came through this could often take up to 15minutes of talking to what sounded bad actors reading lines off a broken autocue - small talk was not allowed, attempting to circumvent the process was not allowed, any slight hiccup would result in the person I was talking to immediately pass me over to a succession of supervisors who all needed to go over the exact same process I had just been through originally. Often I felt like shouting "You just need the number, take the number just please won't you just take the number and let me off the phone ?". In the end they were no more efficient than the guy in Dublin.

      Obviously I'm not judging all the Irish and all the Americans from these two isolated examples but I always found it amusing and would have loved the two two attempt to deal with each other directly.

    14. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, why don't you explain the massive hospitals in small border towns just south of the 49th, right from (on the Canadian side) Vancouver through Thunder Bay?

    15. Re:Well... by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      The health care is NOT state-provided. Health care is provided by doctors opening practices or groups of doctors running a clinic. Same as the states and elsewhere. The difference is that the government pays the doctor, the user doesn't pay.
      And before anyone starts trumpeting about how the U.S. system is better because the government can't do anything right, consider that in the U.S. pretty much the same situation is true -- only in our case, the doctors' purse-strings are controlled not by the government, but by other private, profit-oriented corporations; namely, the insurance companies.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    16. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we pay more taxes in Canada. And our schools are better, there's less crime, and our inner cities don't look like third-world conflict zones. Go figure.

      Yeah.. Canada also have more guns and greenhouse gas emissions per capita than the US. Sounds like my kind of place. :-)

    17. Re:Well... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's a huge difference! The tax burden is 25% higher in Canada by your figures!

      Yes, and I get more for it. When you add in what Americans pay for private health care, your total equivalent burden is 38%, which is 8.6% more than Canadians'. Dispite various patriotic illusions, overall the health-care systems are about the same. The problem with Americans' health-care system isn't that it's capitalistic; it's that it's not. It's inefficient because of monopolization and corruption.

    18. Re:Well... by wash23 · · Score: 1

      I agree with that comment about third world conflict zones. One thing that blew my mind on recent visits to Chicago and Baltimore was the racial/economic tension... man. Canada has nothing close (except maybe Hastings in Vancouver, which is like Baltimore Lite). But in keeping in line with the original topic, I don't think that there's any point in comparing work experiences on so broad a division as Canadian vs. American. There's a huge spectrum of employment opportunities and styles to be found in both countries ranging from the incredibly fun, motivated start-up environment where you work towards common goals with a small group of like-minded people, to the ultra-paranoid megalithic corporate dystopia of alarmed card-key turnstyles, locked elevators, office security cameras, invasive "productivity monitoring" practices, and a totally impersonal relationship with everybody who has any real power over your employment status.

    19. Re:Well... by random+coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I get more for it.

      Of course since Canada doesn't keep an up to date military and depends on the United States for defense, this is not a good comparison. You get benifits from taxes paid in the United States to a level that you don't give.

    20. Re:Well... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Of course since Canada doesn't keep an up to date military and depends on the United States for defense, this is not a good comparison. You get benifits from taxes paid in the United States to a level that you don't give.

      <Nelson>Ha-Ha!</Nelson>

    21. Re:Well... by robogop · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Living in a border town with a decent hospital, I do hear quite a bit about the health care in Canada (B.C. to be specific).

      Yes, many things are better/cheaper in Canada - dental care is much cheaper, laser eye surgery is cheaper, and many drugs are much cheaper. Frequently we head to Canada for these things.

      However, procedures are frequently MUCH slower to be performed - seeing a doctor, getting tests done/results back, actually having the surgery done all can take a lot longer than here in the States. Especially if you need an MRI.

      And hope that you never get injured while in the States - it's patch you up until your stable and then wait until you can have a surgery back in Canada (even if you could have the surgery immediately in the same hospital that you are staying in while you wait for transportation back to Canada.)

      I know one person that waited nearly a month for a treadmill test for diagnosing a heart condition - in the US, that test would have been done probably the day the heart pain was reported and surgery/pacemaker implantation would have occurred within a couple of days. This is only of many stories I have heard of this, but medical testing and examination and surgery can frequently be much slower than in the States.

      And just who was the last person that you heard of that chose to go to Canada for any serious medical procedure? I understand our hospital appreciates greatly all the revenue from Canadians that come this way to get procedures performed quickly.

      The frequent saying I hear is that "Canadian health care is great unless you really need it" - meaning that for anything minor Canadian health care is at least as good as the US system and appears cheaper to the consumer, but if you need serious medical attention, you had better think about having it done in the States.

      --

      I'm a great believer in luck. The harder I work the more I have of it. - Thomas Jefferson
  5. Watch out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    everyone has square heads and rides on bicycles with square wheels!

  6. Well.. by mindstormpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    they have those guys with the red jacket on top of a horse..

    That must change things a lot

    1. Re:Well.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? We sold the IP rights to the mounties to Disney in 1995. Seriously.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. Stupid Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate culture varies by company, everywhere in the world. In Canada, I've worked with 'old' business corporate culture and more relaxed corporate culture.

    Internationally, I've found much the same thing. It's a matter of the company's history, the people who invest in it/own it, the people who are there.

    What a dumb thing to Ask Slashdot.

  8. Canadas not So Bad,.... by nevek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Except for pea-soup-eating separatists, the annoying weather, the sports teams that never win, (go calgary), 90cents a Litre Gas, and 15% Sales Tax!

    But we do have Beer!!

    1. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by urmensch · · Score: 1

      But we do have Beer!!

      No you don't

      We do.

      Just kidding :)

    2. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by ADRA · · Score: 1

      15% You're getting 0wned. Us BCers pay 14.5% :-) Mind you, some provinces really have insane sales tax.

      --
      Bye!
    3. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by SlashSim · · Score: 1

      The beer delivery staff is on strike in British Columbia,

      you insensitive clod.

      --
      If the only tool you have is a hammer, you'd better start looking for a carpentry job.
    4. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmmmmmmm........

      *runs to the store to get a six pack of Oberon*
      *begins planning a trip to Kamalazoo*

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    5. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      90cents a Litre Gas

      That's not looking too bad anymore. Gas here just broke US$2.15 a gallon.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    6. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Tylermccauley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      actually in bc you guys pay 17% for alcohol. its called social service tax. how gay. in alberta the land of the free, its a small 7%.

    7. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      90cents a Litre Gas

      That's not looking too bad anymore. Gas here just broke US$2.15 a gallon.


      90 cents a litre works out to CA$3.41/gallon. If you use the purchasing-power-parity rate, that's US$2.69/gallon.

    8. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

      I live in the Cleveland area, home of the non-winning Sports Teams.

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    9. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by pbox · · Score: 1

      We got $~2.50 a galoon here in SoCal.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    10. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by egeorge · · Score: 1

      It especially looks good when you consider that the high gas prices in canada actually pay for useful things like public transportation.
      Here in the US, we are just getting gouged.

    11. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      90 Canadian cents a liter works out to US$2.45 a gallon. That is less then we are paying in Southern California.

    12. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen (To our Lord Beer)

    13. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having only one governement wasting my money and f*cking me over seem better than two of them, i'll proudly vote yes when the next referendum will come :>

    14. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by ArcticCelt · · Score: 4, Informative

      I live in Montreal Canada and have a degree in computer science (but work for no one cause I have my own company). So I will speak about what I know.

      Positive Stuff: The cost of life is ridiculously low . Beautiful city . Great nightlife. Good international restaurants. Friendly population who come from many parts of the world. Low crime rate;You feel safe almost everywhere at any time in this city (I said almost OK)

      Negative Stuff: Pay checks for IT are smaller than elsewhere (but in some case what you save with the cost of life can easily compensate) Lot of taxes Maybe more difficult to get a job in IT.

      I saw a couple of time ago a documentary about the profile of 6 Americans who decided to come to live to Quebec. There was a reporter, a writer, an engineer, a lawyer, an architect and I.T. guy. I will tell you their words not mines. All where saying basically the same thing. Maybe less money but you can do more with what you have. You have much more support from the government in case something bad happens to you.

      One of them said one insightful sentence: USA really like is winner and take care of them but if thinks start to go wrong you are on your own and the USA system is really hard on losers.

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    15. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Sepper · · Score: 1

      Molson? Labatts?

      Kid Stuff!

      I only drink this stuff (and the occassional Guiness)...

      8%, 9%.... now you're talking :)

      I'll have to admit, though, Bell's/Kalamazoo is a pretty good choise too :)

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    16. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Damn, We bitch an complain here in Alabama about 8%. Of course virtually all tax increases at city, county, or state level must be voted on by the legeslator, signed by the gov and then passed by the people. The first two have a habit of passing them and the 3rd has a habit of saying no. We then promptly replace those in the first 2 catagories who tried to take more of out money. Bob Riley beware.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    17. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Astreja · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fin du Monde! Great beer. (sigh)

      IT-wise, Winnipeg is a very, very closed shop... All the entry-level jobs are Tier 1 help desk. There was major IT overtraining here from '96-'00, much of it sponsored by government retraining programs.

      One of my classmates described himself as an "MCSE Janitor." And my former employer, an IT training centre, crashed and burned.

      It's virtually impossible to get a sysadmin position here. I found one, but I had four years work experience and some database programming and really strong hardware skills and a teaching background and 20 years of office experience. And even then, the odds against me were 150:1.

      The advertised positions generally ask for everything *including* the kitchen sink: "Well, we'd like to see an MCSE, CNE, some Java, two years of project management... And while you're at it can you help us port all our old COBOL from the IBM/360 to that Linux box over there?"

      And we have a saying here: "If you don't like the weather, wait a minute." Went from +23C to four inches of snow in two days.

      (Oh, yes... We Canadians will also confuse the hell out of you by shifting from Imperial to Metric at the drop of a tuque.)

    18. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > pea-soup-eating separatists
      Yeah theses stupid french speaking a**hole are so racist

    19. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Go to Germany if you want real beer. (Sorry, but it had to be said. I have not visited Prague but I have visited much of Canada and Germany (and Scotland). Canadian beer easily beats the "drink" called beer in the U.S. but compared to Europe, ... sorry Canada.)

    20. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Gas here just broke $5.34 a gallon. :-) Guess where I live.

    21. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by ry0n · · Score: 1

      oooh! Bell's! Bell's Special Double Cream Stout! Bell's Expedition Stout!

    22. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! 90 (Canadian) cents a litre gas!!!! 15% Sales Tax!!!!!111111

      Wake up, whoever you are. You could be living in Britain, paying 82 British pence (2 Canadian dollars) per litre of gas, and 17.5% sales tax.

      You North Americans just don't know how much of a good thing you're onto.

    23. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Cally · · Score: 1

      90 cents?!? Here in the UK I've just paid 82p per litre which I think is probably over $1 USD.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    24. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about the separatists, they moved to Florida last year. By that I mean they're getting older and older and nobody's replacing them.

      No seriously, I live in Quebec and I'm a born frog and there's no more talk about separation here. There's probably more talk about it in Toronto and Ottawa.

    25. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by goatpunch · · Score: 1

      Ssshhh, don't tell them how good it is here or they'll come and ruin the place.

    26. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by legality · · Score: 0

      Hey! Easy on the pea-soup-eating comments!

    27. Re:Canadas not So Bad,.... by Darth_M · · Score: 1

      Does not looking *too bad* you say? A gallon , as I remember, is 4 litres. So it is coming close (should beat it soon) to 4$ a gallon. In that price, almost half of it is sales taxes and other taxes to help fund for the roads. I don't know if you travelled in Quebec recently, but the roads of Baghdad are probably in better shape than ours.

  9. I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    People don't speak so loudly. [ducks]

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We have them in New England, they're called "rotaries" here. And frankly, if you've ever driven in New England, you'll know why in this imperfect world of ours, rotaries are not superior to traffic-lighted intersections: because most people either don't know or don't care what the YIELD sign means!

    2. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you aint seen nowt...

      http://www.hemelweb.demon.co.uk/history.htm

    3. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

      RE: Your sig.

      If you'd spent any time driving in greater Boston at all, you'd know that Roundabouts are a terrible idea. I used to pass through about a half-dozen of them on my daily 40-mile commute and it was easily the worst part of the trip.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    4. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by dreamt · · Score: 1

      I'll add to the Boston thing. Concord Rotary on Rte 2, prime example. Rte 2 comes in w/ 2 lanes, and exits w/ 2 lanes, 3 other entrances with 1 lane, the entrances with 1 lane typically back up for at least a mile in rush hour, in addition to the lanes going with rush hour back up for at least 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile. Not good in any case. Lights might suck as much, but the rotary is not the solution (You also have people exiting the rotary from the inner lane where 2 lanes exit. Makes for good physics problem.

    5. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1


      What?

    6. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      There must be something about your roundabouts in Boston that's stopping them from working properly. If you've ever driven in the UK, Ireland or anywhere else in Europe you'll find that they work just fine.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    7. Re:I'll probably get modded troll, but it's true! by festers · · Score: 1

      I spent two weeks driving in Ireland (I'm from the US) and I came away thinking roundabouts are vastly superior to traffic lights. The problem that "rotaries" or "circles" have in the US is that 90% of the drivers don't know how to navigate them correctly. (Not entirely their fault, either, because every state has a different law on how they work, who gets the right of way, etc.)

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  10. Oops, exchange rate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The job may still be bad, but at least you get paid less.

    Why do I live in Canada again?

    1. Re:Oops, exchange rate! by starm_ · · Score: 1

      Because of all the TV shows making fun of americans:
      An American In Canada
      talking to americans talking to americans talking to americans

  11. Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... Tim Hortons

    1. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta tell ya, Tim can suck my Krispy Kreme. Normally I'm all for protecting Canadian things, but I've been to the new Krispy Kreme in Calgary (Kalgary?), and I have seen the promised donut.

    2. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who modded this insightful? It's funny, people.

    3. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, maybe Homer is modding today?

    4. Re:Two Words... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. I went down to Colorado Springs for work and had a hot glazed donut and my god look out Timmy's! However all the rest of their donuts were not any better than what you get at Tim Hortons.

      This is especially true since TH started centralizing their manufacturing process.

    5. Re:Two Words... by marick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, Tim Hortons was everywhere when I visited Toronto. I loved it - the donuts and coffee were so consistent.

      Of course, the coffee was consistently lousy, but that's just my opinion. And the donuts were awesome.

    6. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No joke.

      I mean, yes.

      I mean, uh, well uh yeah, you know.

      Funny: yes. Insightful: um, ok sure.

    7. Re:Two Words... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Timmies doughnuts have gone to shit ever since they fired all their chefs. I used to have a buddy (cousin's boyfriend, actually) that was a chef at a local Timmies. Holy fuck did he make some good goddamn doughnuts... but of course, free always tastes better ;). Anyways, he got shuffled around between so many stores and shitty shifts that he told them where to stick their job. A few weeks later, other chefs started getting let go, and in their place came big trucks with boxes full of frozen "standardized" (read: smaller) doughnuts that any idiot could toss in the oven to make. Ever since then, the dougnuts just haven't been the same :(.

      Their soups, sandwitches, etc are still pretty tasty though. Especially the soup... "AND THEN I ATE THE BOWL!" Mmm. Bowl. (And i'm sure only the Canadians got that joke :P)

    8. Re:Two Words... by Zibi · · Score: 1

      Tim Hortons has horrible, horrible coffee. Good coffee is Murchies, or fail that, Starbucks will suffice.

      --
      -Zibi
    9. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      "As of January 2004, there are over 180 Tim Hortons locations in the United States. These are situated in the greater Detroit area, Bay City, Midland, Saginaw and Flint (Michigan); Columbus, Dayton and Toledo (Ohio); Buffalo and Jamestown (New York); and Portland, Lewiston and Auburn (Maine). Future expansion and opportunities will continue in these markets as well as Rochester (New York) and Erie (PA)."--from a franchising site.

      Tim Horton's in Columbus never did much for me, but I hear the Canadian ones are better.

    10. Re:Two Words... by TikiTDO · · Score: 1

      I believe the words you're looking for are "Second Cup."

    11. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      == Krispy Kreme!!

      Another diff I noticed while working in North US ( AKA Canada - )

      The Us Govt claims 2000 Calories per day as a balanced diet...

      Canadian Govt recommends 2400 Cal per day ( or what ever the metric equivalent to calorie is???)

      Just a little difference that I noticed while there..

    12. Re:Two Words... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Why don't you LAZY-ass Americans brew your own coffee? Why do you need to buy it from a goddamn coffee house? It's one of the easiest drinks in the world to make. Take disolvable ground coffee beans, add boiling water and (optionally) milk/sugar. But no, that's too difficult for you. You've got to get back to coding your cross-platform company automatic porn downloader.

    13. Re:Two Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got one of those right out side of this classroom. $1.20 (CDN of course) for a cookie. Second Cup == Rippoff.

    14. Re:Two Words... by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      but as long as the coffee is consistent, then atleast you can prepare yourself for it. there's a few levels of bad coffee, in my opinion. from worst to not so awful:

      a. gas station "been on the burner all day" coffee
      b. gas station "insert a loony, push a button on a machine" coffee (i'm not canadian, i just wanted to say loony)
      c. fast food resturaunt coffee.

      and the least awful

      d. franchise donut shop coffee. They atleast know a lot of people drink coffee with donuts so they not only have frequent fresh brews, but also not that bad of bean.

    15. Re:Two Words... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      If you are in Ottawa, the best place for Apple Fritters is Carmello's. THere is one in Clarica Place (Bank and Albert) and another one in L'Esplanade Laurier (Bank and Slater) They are like almost the size of a frizbee and covered in glaze. Mmmm glaze :)

    16. Re:Two Words... by iantri · · Score: 1
      b. gas station "insert a loony, push a button on a machine" coffee (i'm not canadian, i just wanted to say loony)
      FYI, it's loonie.

      A bit of education from a Canadian.

  12. Let me tell you how it differs. by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People are not nearly so uptight as in the US. Gor crying out loud, we had an office party here for Christmas and everyone got a drunk &#8212 those who didn't still sang and danced and had a good time. Contrast this with my experience with typical American office parties where they order some bland catered food, sip on mineral water and itch at their cotton-polyester blend polo shirts waiting to go home so they can work some more.

    There's much more of an "open collar" atmosphere in Canada. Everyone trusts everyone else, we're all ready to get to know one another, and we certainly don't stay uptight after the regional manager has ended his visit to our office. Working in Canada is much less conducive to heart attacks.

    1. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 1

      Did you work for the bland catering service, the mineral water company, or the polo shirt making company? Seriously, what US office party are YOU going to...?

    2. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I can attest to this. While in the US I'm not even allowed to drink yet, up here I get free beer on "Thirsty thursdays" when everyone in the studio hangs out and drinks.

      By the way, I'm an American working in Toronto as a 3d animator. I like it here.

      --
      Everything seemed to be going so nice
      'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
    3. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by cadfael · · Score: 1

      Yep. Canadian culture is much more relaxed (or just far less tense).

      --
      -- The Hollow Man
      Non illegitimati carborundum
    4. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by infochuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People are not nearly so uptight as in the US. Gor crying out loud, we had an office party here for Christmas and everyone got a drunk

      You sure you aren't just working for the wrong people? Lots of places throw a x-mas party, and there's even alcohol on occasion.

      My current employers throw parties whenever they can, and the boss is usually the most drunk. 'Sgot nuthin; to do with the country. Though there are other reasons Canadia appeals to me...

    5. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I will somewhat agree with you on this, at least at smaller companies in Canada. My company was doing a software project for a company in Ottawa, and their CEO happened to also own a web design shop that was working with us on the project. I remember being particularly impressed when my partners and I went out for lunch with the CEO and the tattooed web designer (this guy worked miracles in Flash, I've gotta say, and we ended up having him do all our corporate web design stuff).


      Anyway, these two fellows from very different social backgrounds, one essentially being the boss' boss of the other, seemed to feel pretty comfortable kicking back a few bottles of Blue (Labbatt's Blue, the Canadian equivalent of... well, they drink the stuff as often as we drink coke or pepsi down here). Mind you, I often went out with both our CEO and with the people who worked for me, but that was the nature of my job. You'd rarely see my company's CEO out at lunch with our software developers, and if you did, they weren't exactly comfortably chit-chatting and kicking back beers, it always seemed much more strained.


      It was always a pleasure to do work with our Canadian customers, and we always had a good time up there. Of course, I have to note that these guys were all making about a third what they'd have been making in the Boston area, when you account for currency differences and so on (then again, the cost of living is certainly lower up there, though it's not THAT much lower). Also, I suspect that big corporate environments in Canada are more uptight than what I saw, and I doubt that a large insurance company in Canada would be so much more laid back than a large insurance company in the US. But maybe I'm wrong.

    6. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >>Everyone trusts everyone else, we're all ready to get to know one another, and we certainly don't stay uptight after the regional manager has ended his visit to our office.

      So how long have you worked for the Department of Immigration?

      >>Working in Canada is much less conducive to heart attacks.

      And it's a right good thing, considering the, uh, "efficiency" of the Canadian socialist medical system.

      --
      Jon

      P.S. for Moderators: It's not flamebait if it made you laugh.

    7. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by jlanthripp · · Score: 1
      Funny, the last corporate christmas party I went to was held at an extremely high-class restaurant where dudes in organ-grinders' monkey suits kneeled by your side to take your order. The menu for the evening included roast tenderloin of fallow deer, caviar, and trio de fromage (three cheeses).

      There was a live band and a free-flowing bar, and most of the folks got shitfaced, including me (gotta love that long island tea). A few of the more boisterous employees took frequent trips to the bathroom to powder their noses, and a few of us took a walk to the parking garage to smoke a doobie. This was in Atlanta, BTW.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You must work at a pretty small company. This would never happen at a large company, because someone might get offended and sue for harassment or something.

    9. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Have to do the standard Toronto Jab.
      What is the best view of Toronto?
      In your rearview mirror :)

      For those outside Canada, Toronto has been known to think they are the center of Canada (the fact they have a larger population than most Provinces and Territories doesn't help) but still Toronto is a very friendly city compared to most of our southern cousins.

    10. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 1

      I work at a major university in Montreal doing tech support for the labs/faculty. Some Jobs we do for the student groups, we get paid in beer. And, it's not canoe-sex beer. (I'm sure all Canadians will get that) Our X-mass party last year, everything was free, all night, open bar, even the $50 Cuban cigars. So, is this a measure of Canada?

    11. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a small company like Microsoft? They have catered parties with huge amounts of beer often (might explain some of the bugs), they even let the contractors in. :)

    12. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "more relaxed" == "less productive"

      Socialist countries usually *are* less productive and more laid back. They have no interest in success or achievement. As long as the motherland (or pretty much ANYONE ELSE BUT THEMSELVES is looking out for them), they don't care.

    13. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      (this guy worked miracles in Flash, I've gotta say, and we ended up having him do all our corporate web design stuff).

      Pet peeve warning:

      Please no! Flash is the worst thing that could have ever happened to the web. The number of unnavigable sites, pages you can't bookmark, long download times, yet another flash upgrade to install, you can't be guaranteed to have it working on every computer you are running on and forget about having your site indexed properly by search engines. It just goes against the philosphy of the web, which is 'write once, view anywhere' - I really feel Flash is about fanzy jazz first and information accessibility last.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    14. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's something to brag about, working with coke fiends and potheads. Your mother must be so proud.

    15. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by jmv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work for a company in Montreal where we had beer&chips provided by the company every friday afternoon. They got bought by a US company and had a hard time keeping that (though they managed to - until everything closed).

    16. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Nept · · Score: 1

      but that could easily describe the difference between two corporations in the US ...

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    17. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard the beer is better up north.

    18. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Interesting. I work for a US mortgage company. Back in the day we threw big bashes, did all sorts of crazy drinking and partying (the company as a whole) and were none the worse for it

      Then we got bought by a large Canadian bank who has proceeded to stomp out all forms of creativity, expression, and joy we had left in our jobs. Now all our functions are the itch your Polo shirt can't wait to get home kind.

      Just goes to show, it's not a US vs. Canada issue, it's a company vs. company issue.

    19. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      I think the "Toronto superiority" thing came from the former loudmouth mayor of the city. Most of the people here live their lives the same as anybody else. But there are two very different sides of Toronto. There is Toronto proper itself (a wonderful place to live I might add), and then there are the suburbanites around it that still call themselves Torontonians. I think the fact that these people (the suburbanites) are among the highest income earners in Canada is more to do with the jabs that are made from and to Toronto. The fact that crime is lower per capita in the city itself than the surrounding suburbs (and 9 of the largest 10 other cities in canada) says a lot.

    20. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by zootread · · Score: 1

      People are not nearly so uptight as in the US. Gor crying out loud, we had an office party here for Christmas and everyone got a drunk &#8212 those who didn't still sang and danced and had a good time. Contrast this with my experience with typical American office parties where they order some bland catered food, sip on mineral water and itch at their cotton-polyester blend polo shirts waiting to go home so they can work some more.

      Umm.. Dude.. I work for a small software company in the U.S. We are TOTALLY relaxed. I mean, an office party usually means a lot of alcohol and several of us will bring some weed. Most people get stoned, those who don't, at least get good and shitfaced. Hell, at the end of the work day its not uncommon for a bunch of us to get stoned (in the office no less!). I love my job.

      But your generalizations are probably correct, my company is quite the exception to the rule.

      Send some of those B.C. buds my way, bro.

      --
      Zoot!
    21. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Tuzanor · · Score: 1
      And it's a right good thing, considering the, uh, "efficiency" of the Canadian socialist medical system.

      And 95% of Canadians would have it no other way. But you want to talk about efficiency? Canada spends 30% less per capita on health care and we still have universal (and high quality, though not as high as at the top of the american food chain). Though you have to do your own REAL homework on this issue and form your own opinions. And question statistics. Canadians have an almost 3 year longer life expectency than americans, but it's not only because of the health care system...it's because a significantly fewer percentage of Canadians smoke.

    22. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by timothv · · Score: 1

      Shutup. Flash is cool. A lot of creativity would be missing on the web without it. Have you noticed that the flash-only sites aren't popular? They'll slowly learn their lesson.

    23. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Read this... It'll just take a minute or two, unless you've seen it mentioned in newspapers, in which case you'll be able to skim it.

      Sure, the report conveniently ignores the US because they do not provide universal service, but sharing a border with 'em doesn't mean them spending more for (debatably) less excuses Canada spending more for (not-so-debatably) less than practically every other developed nation.

    24. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by badman99 · · Score: 0

      Hmmm I guess your companys head office is situated in a high density trailer park as well :) Please call +61405685723 should you have any queries.

    25. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my US company used to be like that too. Then the VP got drunk, fell down, and cracked his head open...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    26. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Burnon · · Score: 1

      FWIW, having worked at a small US company (just as cool a place as described by the parent poster to your message), and having watched it grow into a unit of a big US company, it's basically the same thing.

      Big company == big money, at which point people get more uptight - no ifs, ands, or buts about it.

    27. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 1

      I don't think using controlled substances in the workplace is anything but an indicication of criminal proclivity, not how laid back it is.

    28. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'm Canadian, and it's news to me, looking from north to south, that people don't socialize within their company. I think you've really hit on something here if that's different from the States. My company regularly goes out for beers, president included. Doesn't strain me in the slightest. Some years ago I worked for a hardware store (now known as Rona - big box store like Home Depot), and the president of that company (a large company by Canadian standards) stopped by our store. We had a pool table in the staff room, we played, I beat him. I didn't get fired. :-) I guess we are more laid back.

    29. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I work for a US mortgage company. Back in the day we threw big bashes, did all sorts of crazy drinking and partying (the company as a whole) and were none the worse for it

      "Back in the day" is the key phrase here. Crazy drinking and crazy partying usually leads to crazy lawsuits. That's why those company traditions are dying here in the US.

    30. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1

      One of the biggest cost of living differences is in housing/rent. It's increased a lot in the past couple years, but that's mainly because its low to begin with. Most everything else is indeed more expensive (though not hi-speed internet access).

    31. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolling mother fucker. Why don't you come on over here and suck daddy's dick?

    32. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      That must be the secret to how Canada became such an economic superpower. We Americans should learn from them.

    33. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I once heard that the Byward Market in Ottawa had the highest crime rate per capita in Canada. This isn't really surprising since it is an area where the number of people who live there is continuously dwarved by people who work, tour, come down to get completely drunk (it is a bar area so every weekend the amount of people there skyrockets)

    34. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by Tuzanor · · Score: 1

      Interesting statistic, as I spent some time growing up there. I was always left with the impression that that area had an overall good "grungy" character to it. I would say that downtown Ottawa is one of the best places to live in Canada, it's too bad most of the rest of Ottawa is SOOO boring. And I love big cities, so it's why I chose to live in Toronto, where you don't need to own a car and you can go almost anywhere you'd want to go without one.

    35. Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by TimeZone · · Score: 1
      Hmm, lessee. You've got an ID of Power Everywhere, an email address of Fishkill@ziplip.com, and that silly "bling bling" link in your sig.

      We're supposed to believe you live and work in Canada, and not East Fishkill NY?

      TZ

  13. Well... by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's basically the same, except you get paid less and you're taxed more. Also, instead of the company providing health insurance, you get state-provided health care that is roughly about as good as health care in Uganda.

  14. Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by bcore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have no idea if this is actually a difference, but I definitely find that IT workers here (in Toronto) are not one bit concerned about outsourcing..

    Of course, I have no idea if the general IT population in the states are either, or if it's just especially strong here on /.

    1. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because you already work for outsourcing wages. Why worry about outsourcing when you are the bottom of the barrel?

    2. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're just more educated about the overstated impact of outsourcing compared to the natural churn of job losses/gains in the economy as a whole.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 1

      People on slashdot over-reacting to something? No... (/end sarcasm)

    4. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      That's because IT in Canada IS outsourcing.

    5. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by bcore · · Score: 1

      Not in my eyes. I work for a domestic company producing domestic software for domestic clients. I know a lot of people in the same situation.

      There's nothing "outsourced" about it.

    6. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was a joke. Obviously, any non-USA country can be an "outsourced" country. I consider Canada such a friendly next door neighbor that it is hard for me to think of it as a different country.
      I am sure that your company and many others are just like the many USA companies that do not outsource.

    7. Re:Less fear of outsourcing, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww, look, how cute! A neo-con capitalist - sooth us with your lies about how a reduced standard of living is actually better for Ameria.

  15. Very similar to some degree by genkael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many of the companies in Canada are just counterparts to American companies. Specifically I'm referring to MNCs (multi-national corps). However, the environment is a little more easy going unless they are a division of an American company at which point that can be more difficult to work for. I've worked in the past with Canadian divisions of an MNC and this was usually the case. Smaller companies are still the way to go. You might want to look into a Canada based insurance company since you have some experience in a similar environment.

    --
    GeneralKael -- Slacker Extraordinaire
  16. Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How is the outsourcing situation there?

  17. Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prepare to get raped by taxes.

  18. Wage Slave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    and we call ourselves free, although we spend what little time we have on this planet working, weird species

    1. Re:Wage Slave by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't worry; sometimes corporations realize how bad wage slavery is and emancipate their slaves. This is happening a lot these days. Maybe one day soon almost all of us will be free!

      http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/arts/economics /h udson/pelinks/exploitation.html

    2. Re:Wage Slave by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      When animals get to eat at restaurants and/or supermarkets I will feel you are right about which is the working species. How many of the animals you eat were killed and skinned by you?

    3. Re:Wage Slave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how many vegetables had to die for your stupid salad?!

  19. Corporate reality by ssmith39 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    With American companies, the day they hire you they are trying to figure out how to lay you off. The reality is, we're all independent contractors (easier to limit the unions).

    --
    Intelligent is to conservative as goat is to parking meter.
  20. Privat Sector Baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move Here. and Look for work Here.

  21. Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cananda is not the 51st state and moving there isn't like moving to North Dakota.

    If you are unhappy with corporate life in the US, get out of corporate life, not the US. Insurance is one of those industries dominated very large companies. Lots of rules, regulations and PHB. Go find a (stable, profitable, non-high tech) company with 80 - 200 employees. It is a whole 'nother world working for a small to midsized company.

    1. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by anethema · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are a lot of reasons to leave the USA right now.

      A lot of Canadas laws are a lot less harsh than those in the USA. We have copyright obviously, but stuff like sharing music is legal. My friends can borrow my cd's and burn them, I can download from P2P networks, etc. All legally.

      We certainly dont have anything like the patriot act or the DMCA.

      I'm sure we will eventually be in the same boat, but currently, you can have a bit more peace of mind living in canada than the usa. (All IMHO :)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    2. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right... the last thing Canada needs is more Americans ;)

    3. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      But if you are someone who is tired of the U.S. -- not tired of corporate life -- then it is perfectly advisable to get out of Dodge.

      There are plenty who just can't seem to fathom how anyone would tire of the US. Generally, though, those people haven't been anywhere else or they've just come from somewhere so god forsaken that the U.S. seems like heaven by comparison. If you've ever been down-and-out, the US can be a pretty vicious place and the evidence of that can get pretty damned tiring when you're not and when you've lived places where homelessness and destitute indigence just don't exist--especially when you realize that the social cost of eliminating those scourges is practically nil AND that the US per capita budget so far exceeds the places that have dealt with those issues that there is no excuse for the amount of social darwinism you experience here.

      That said, a person can tire of any place. Switzerland has few if any of these problems, yet , for instance, Aldous Huxley repeatedly referred to it as a dark, stifling and painful place to live. The point is, it isn't a sign of some sort of personal failure that you feel like living elsewhere. If you feel like leaving, leave and be happy that you had the resources to do so rather than feeling trapped in a place you can't stand anymore.

    4. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by CatGrep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you are unhappy with corporate life in the US, get out of corporate life, not the US.

      Unfortuneately, the two are becoming synonymous. The president is bought & paid for by corporations. Same with a lot of Senators and Congresspeople. The laws are being made to favor the corporations over the people (DMCA, for example). Even the military is being corporatized: corporations seem to be in charge of major parts of the ridiculous Iraq war that we're now bogged down in.

      some of the same things are probably happening in Canada as well (except the war part, they've wisely stayed out of this one), but it seems a bit slower. And at least when you're out of work up there you've got health care.

    5. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Talk about non sequitur! The poster was thinking of leaving the US over corporate culture, not over his inability to pirate music. Let me translate in case you don't understand:

      Poster: "Housing prices are too high in the US. Should I move to Canada?"

      anethemea: "Yes because they don't strip search you at the Toronto International Airport!"

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      especially when you realize that the social cost of eliminating those scourges is practically nil

      Off topic. From what I've seen of some US cities, it doesn't matter how much you spend and how many shelters you build, homelessness will still exist. It's not a problem you throw resources at to make go away. San Fransisco is literally going bankrupt financing the most extensive social programs ever seen, yet its homeless problem continues to grow.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    7. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we will eventually be in the same boat, but currently, you can have a bit more peace of mind living in canada than the usa.

      Hmmm...lets see. Free music or free speech.

      I think I know which one I'd rather have.

    8. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by No+One+You+Know · · Score: 1

      I understand that, but I'm not moving to Canada because I dislike corporate life in America. I'm moving to Vancouver for personal reasons; I've traveled quite a bit both inside and outside of the US, and Vancouver is the only place I've actually felt a real attraction to. Getting a new job is more incidental than anything else.

    9. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by thracky · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Canada has both. Considering you apparently don't LIVE in Canada, I think you should probably not assume one case from Quebec of all places (Frankly the most un-Canadian part of Canada IMO) constitutes that we are unable to swear or express our opinions freely. And to tell the truth I think we can all do without the hate mongering and groups like the KKK, which covers the hate speech part of that whole thing.

    10. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by bach_m · · Score: 0

      anethemea: "Yes because they don't strip search you at the Toronto International Airport!" they don't? thats not been my experience........

    11. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but you silly twits outlawed machine guns a while back, whereas I can still toy around with mine here. For now. :)

    12. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Tuffnut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately we do have a patriot act that was introduced soon after USA introduced theirs.

      http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/2/parlbus/chambus/house /b ills/government/C-17/C-17_3/C-17TOCE.html

    13. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that toying with the idea of legalizing/decriminalizing a banned substance is not political suicide in Canada.

    14. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we have copyright obviously, but stuff like sharing music is legal. My friends can borrow my cd's and burn them, I can download from P2P networks, etc. All legally....We certainly dont have anything like the patriot act or the DMCA.

      Nor any media producing industry, for obvious reasons.

      BTW - why not call a spade a spade, re-write your sentence as:

      "My friends can steal-material-that-they-didn't-pay-for and burn them."

      And then tell that to the artists (not to mention the - ugh - middle-men) who aren't getting their dime.

      fucking slacker.

      (as always, mod- for a non-/.-mindspeak post)

    15. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Canada has both.

      Actually, they don't. Regardless of the ruling in Quebec, section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that Candadians have the right to "Freedom of Expression". However, according to section 1, all rights granted under this charter are subject to "reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society". In America, the Bill of Rights comes with no qualifications. In the specific case of free speech, this means that extreme political viewpoints cannot be labeled as hate speech and banned. Not so, in Canada.

    16. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Dravik · · Score: 1

      For now, with some work mabey for a long while.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    17. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect when you are trying to smuggle a stainless steel dildo up your ass?

    18. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 1

      Well regardless of what the law says on paper, last time I watched TV, I could see tits and hear people swear without every freakin' magazine and newspaper making a whole deal out of it and nobody got slapped with huge fines.

      You may get in trouble if you're some kind of extremely racist jerk trying to start a chapter of the KKK but as far as I'm concerned, I never felt limited in my freedom of expression as a Canadian. It's not like the government goes around and censors people.

      Remember there is a difference between the textual laws and how they are applied. I always see people quoting specific articles but they aren't necessarily mirrors of a society's reality.

    19. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Off the mark.

      Ever been to Northern Europe?

      The problem is making sure people don't BECOME homeless. We're trying to "fix" the homeless instead of preventing people from _becoming_ homeless. The problem with American social insurance is that if you lose your corporate job, unless you have children or are EXTREMELY disabled, you are completely S.O.L. This isn't off-topic at all. It is part of the stress of the American corporate culture where you a scared to death of losing your health insurance and over the weekend becoming completely indigent. Part of the originial poster's concerns were very much to do with the social structure of Canada, which is very similar to that of, among other places, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Sweden, Iceland, Norway... etc. etc. You'll see more homeless in two blocks walking through D.C. than you will walking across the whole of western/nothern Europe. That's as good a reason as any to choose a place to live and work, IMO.

      Off topic my ass.

    20. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by FrenchyinCT · · Score: 1
      Hey, I'm outta here. My immigration app is sitting on the Consulate in Buffalo where I expect to have a decision on it next century. But hey, once I can get up there, I'll be more than happy to live in a somewhat more liberal country where they have better things to do than nose around in your drawers, micromanage your life and where you can walk around with your head high because YOUR head of state is anyone other than George Bush.

      I'm hardly the only Yank looking to blow out of here. Others are tired of living in a semi-police state as well.

    21. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      That's why I used the term "permanent homeless". The cause might certainly be due to some aspects of American culture (we're not so perfect as our friends across the Atlantic), but *permanent* homelessness is not caused by job loss. Temporary homelessness, yes, but not permanent.

      When you look at the permanent homeless in the US, they are either mentally or "chemically" impaired. If I ever became homeless I would learn the location of every homeless shelter within ten kilometers. And I would use them until I got back on my feet. But in places like San Fransisco social workers have to go out into the street to "remind" the homeless about the existance of shelters.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    22. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Having been a case manager for a gaggle of social workers dealing with indigents for many years, suffice it to say, my experience differs from your speculation.

    23. Re:Leaving the country is a bit over the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you. Congrats :)

  22. Well... it depends. by mark-t · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you like being unemployed, or simply working without getting paid, being a sysadmin in Canada is just fine.

    Do I sound bitter? Well... maybe I am, just a touch.

    1. Re:Well... it depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're on the wrong side of the country..... if you'll work for 35k to start and will move to TO, email p4u1m23yahoo.canada.

  23. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My job was outsourced, so now I'm moving, does anyone know of any openings in Canada ?

  24. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well we already have your TV channels and some province in far east wants to separate. On the other hand I don't know if there is any differences in the corporate world. If you want to call in sick be ready to Fedex in your first born and 8 hour days still apply (lunch does not count).

  25. jumping ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go ahead , im sick of hearing about fair weathered americans who are moving to "better" places like canada.

  26. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by strictnein · · Score: 1, Funny

    ok... that's really lame... but i find it really really funny

    Do you know how to speak Canadian? It's like English, but some people speak French. I think it's because they are under the impression that they are in France. This impression is wrong. They are in Canada!

    Canadian-French is to French as Ebonics is to English

  27. Exactly the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barring tax laws and perhaps a slightly more liberal outlook on life, the corporate environment is exactly the same in both countries. "Eat or be eaten".

  28. Exchange rate by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    No joke ... the Canadian dollar is NOT strong against the U.S. dollar right now. Be prepared for your lower salary to not stretch as far as you'd like it to.

    Conversely, it seems like a great time to live in Canada if you can get paid in U.S. dollars by an American company...

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Exchange rate by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Maybe he just want's some fresh air, like having a nice day without choking on the stench of Lockheed & Bush. Then again, maybe not.

    2. Re:Exchange rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Be prepared for your lower salary to not stretch as far as you'd like it to.

      Actually, most products available internationally are the same 'Dollar Value'.

      ie if 2 TacoBell mushy bean things cost $1 USD the chances are it will also cost $1 CDN.

      The CND dollar has some amazing buying power.

    3. Re:Exchange rate by SpyHunter99 · · Score: 1

      Are you on crack? The Candian dollar is the higest it has been in a long time against the US dollar.

    4. Re:Exchange rate by Garak · · Score: 1

      Its strong now compared to where is was two years ago. It's around 75 cents US right now, its been down as low as 62 censt in the past few years.

      --
      God, root, what is the difference?
    5. Re:Exchange rate by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      Are you on crack? The Canadian dollar is at 0.7207 dollars US right now, down more than a nickel from the peak set half a year back.

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    6. Re:Exchange rate by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I spent two weeks in Colorado a month ago and I found a lot of the typical companies that are in Canada as well as the US (i.e Gap, Starbucks etc) price their products identically $10US=$10Cdn on both sides of the border. I was going to buy some liquor there but comparing the difference in rates most of the time the prices were identical after exchange and sometimes prices were more expensive than Canada.

    7. Re:Exchange rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liquor is the one thing that will never be cheaper in Canada. There are *massive* taxes on it.

    8. Re:Exchange rate by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I thought so too but was extremely surprised. I looked in several stores in Colorado Springs and Scotches were the same price in American as they were in Canadian. A bottle of Johnny Walker Blue Label which is $214Cdn in Ontario was $240US in Colorado.

      Unless you are buying cheap stuff like Capt Morgan rum or a 24 of Bud in cans, in general, suprisingly, prices were no better.

      I decided to wait until I went to Alberta on a future trip.

      So when I went to Edmonton Alberta I picked up a bottle of Oban ($92 in Ontario, 59 there) and a 1000ml bottle of Dalwhinnie 15 year (64 in Ontario for the 750ml while I paid 60).

      If you are in Edmonton, go to the Liquor store behind the Chateau Louis. Excellent selection of premium liquors

  29. Greatest difference: by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Mandatory toque.

    Hope you don't mind permanent hat hair.

    1. Re:Greatest difference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandatory TOQUE?

      I knew that they were a bit more permissive with natural hemp - but this is ridiculous!

    2. Re:Greatest difference: by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You must remember.. some people in the lower United States do not know what a toque/tuque is... obligatory dictionary linkage: Canadjan-Toque-explanation-donchaknow?

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    3. Re:Greatest difference: by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 3, Informative

      A google image search is much more informative.

    4. Re:Greatest difference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, am I the only one who did an image search for back bacon?

    5. Re:Greatest difference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

  30. Re:Dodging? by Oxy+the+moron · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not true. Canada and the US have an agreement that Canadians entering the US and Americans entering Canada are still subject to the draft of either country.

    The ever-popular "dodge the draft by fleeing to Canada" no longer works.

    --

    Proudly supporting the Libertarian Party.

  31. Re:Canadian business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    & better beer.

  32. It's aboot the same aye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bit more polite and you get to stay under the nuclear umbrella!

  33. Canada cities by ArCaNe50 · · Score: 0

    No its not like the USA in terms of B2B you drive out of the city and there is farms for hundreds of kilometers. So B2B and interoffice operations are much different. Not to mention the weather or the difference in population. These things have an effect on new job openings that the USA simply does not have.

  34. Why don't you quit working for corporations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are other places to find work besides a corporation. What is your problem?

  35. language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... eh?

  36. It's no different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You will find the same exact politics and frustrations at a Canadian company that you find at an American company. The only benefit to working in Canada is a different level of social responsiblity, less personal independance accross the board and, of course, much better beer. Mean people are mean people whether they live in CAN or the US. Bad management is ubiquitous to the World. They do put a bit more effort into their breakfast pastries, however. The girls are easier to fool, and, perhaps the most important is that you find its really cold.
    Don't forget that you CANadian is pretty much an ameriCAN.

  37. You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    You will probably make less and are paid in Canadian dollars, so that 60K a year isn't as nice as it sounds. You will also pay higher taxes. But, you also gain free health care as well and have more public facilitties. Also, you can take pride in the fact that your tax dollars don't go to humiliating and tortuing Iraqi POW's.
    Also, it's really, really, really cold in Canada. Hope you like Hockey! Keep in mind, your boss will still suck.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:You make less by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You will probably make less and are paid in Canadian dollars, so that 60K a year isn't as nice as it sounds.

      I think you need to compare the cost of living along with salary.

    2. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      heh.. it's 26 degrees C in Ottawa today, but yes, winter gets chilly.
      One other thing worth mentioning is that even if your salary turns out to be lower, cost of living is equally lower.

    3. Re:You make less by molarmass192 · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the income tax level, combined federal and state taxes are actually very close to Canadian federal and provincial rates. The biggest difference is the insane sales taxes in Canada, something like 15% on what seems to be everything. Hard liquor is also hella-expensive but not as wallet brusting as in Europe.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    4. Re:You make less by yamla · · Score: 1

      I'm not at all sure health care is free here. I currently owe several hundred dollars for Alberta Health Care. Now, granted that money doesn't actually go in to the health care system but I'm still being billed for it on a monthly basis.

      And of course, we pay for ambulance rides and the like.

      It almost certainly still works out cheaper than health care in the U.S., mind you.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    5. Re:You make less by elefantstn · · Score: 1, Funny
      You will also pay higher taxes. But, you also gain free health care


      Right. And if you buy this car, I will give you a free toaster!
      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    6. Re:You make less by teklob · · Score: 1

      I live in southern BC and I have to say that it really isn't much colder here. Some people take the Canadian stereotypes too far. There's stories about people crossing the border from Washington into BC in the summer wearing winter jackets, as if they were expecting a wall of snow when you cross an imaginary line. In my (most definitely biased) opinion, it's the best place in the world to live.

    7. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you.

    8. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, you can take pride in the fact that your tax dollars don't go to humiliating and tortuing Iraqi POW's.


      all of canada's tax dollars are tied up in smiling politely while mass genocides go on under their noses (cough-rwanda-cough)
    9. Re:You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      To me, money is money. If I make 50K US and the equal is something like 35K (give or take a few K) then this leaves me with 50K to invest in other business, so I have more capital. Cost of living is one thing, to be sure, but it's not the only thing. So, after you factor out the cost of living, you are left with a sum that you can do what you want with, such as investing. So, if wages and cost of living are linear (lets say it takes 4/5 of your income to live), then I would be left with 10K US from working in the USA and 7K US while working in Canada, while doing the same job. So, in effect, you are more wealthy earning US dollars at US rates.

      But, it's not like this is the only thing either. You could argue that it's worth 3K US to be able to travel safely and not have the stigma attached that you're American. I mean, who doesn't love Canaians? Wayne Gretzky was my idol growing up and who didn't watch "You Can't Do That On Television"! :)

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    10. Re:You make less by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it is always really cold. Right now it is around 25 degrees C here. Plus the southern most tip of Canada is more south than the northern most tip of California.

      However come January it gets pretty cold.

    11. Re:You make less by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

      No, our tax dollars go to torturing and murdering Somalis instead. Guns. Stress. Poor leadership. Shit happens.

      But, it is damned cold here though. Supposed to snow tonight, goddammit!

    12. Re:You make less by escher · · Score: 1

      Oh sure! Why I feel much safer with Bush and the US Army angering terrorist groups to the point of unbridled rage. Why, that's just a fucking brilliant idea!

    13. Re:You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "as a whole it does an awful lot for this world"

      Such as reminding the world, time and time again, that they should probably not trust the USA, just in case they were starting to trust the USA. So yes, they really do, do a lot for the world in this regard.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    14. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out this wizzy cost of living calculator to compare costs between cities all over the world.

      For example, if you are making $100k a year in San Francisco, you need to be making around $76K a year in Vancouver to have a similar standard of living.

      Move to Regina, and you only need to make around $47K a year.

      I think the most important distinction job-wise is that most Canucks I know work 45 hours or LESS a week. None of this 70-hour-a-week crap I hear about in the US.

    15. Re:You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "But, it is damned cold here though. Supposed to snow tonight, goddammit!"

      I know what you mean. During winter here in Wisconsin, it's one thing when they say a cold stream is coming in, but when they say a cold stream is coming in from, eeek!, CANADA!!!, that's when all of a sudden that lame scarf your aunt gave you isn't so lame anymore.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    16. Re:You make less by reidbold · · Score: 1

      Alberta is certainly the anomaly regarding health care. I've never paid a nickel out of my pocket for any health care, except dental.

      --
      -Reid
    17. Re:You make less by Raagshinnah · · Score: 1
      But, you also gain free health care as well and have more public facilitties. Also, you can take pride in the fact that your tax dollars don't go to humiliating and turtuing Iraqi POW's

      First off, our health care is decrepit due to the lack of competition and the idiocy of worker unions(in quebec anyways, I haven't looked at the other provinces but it can't be that different). Second of all, about those vague "other services" that people refer to when speaking of our taxes, I'd like someone to point them out to me, cause I haven't seen any improvements compared to the US:

      our roads are in a horrible condition, our health care system is ridiculous, our "culture" funding is pretty much just another way for the same people to pump more money from the gov( PKP, Julie snyder and the like).

      And no, our tax dollars don't go to humiliating and torturing Iraqi POW's, they go to reward generals like Romeo D'allaire, who let his unit get dismembered by enemy soldiers while he was having tea with the enemy leader (there's a nice ceremony for him each year, cute eh)

      Our tax money was also used to merge a bunch of cities _without being asked_ (yay democracy), to contracts given to friends of the party. Oh and also for the Red Cross' lawyers when they gave HIV-positive blood to a bunch of people _when they knew the blood was infected. There's also the CRTC, which is funded by our taxes and is used mostly for censorship against the Party's enemies and to force radios to air 60% of french content even though nobody likes french music.

      Then again, it might just be Quebec - I wouldn't know.

    18. Re:You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Bush even said he was going to "catch" all these terrorists. I feel a lot better now, how about you?

      Oh, and don't forget, these people being filled with rage also have childeren (many of them in many cases) that will witness all this so we can look forward to at least another 60 years of this fun! Yay!

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    19. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you can't afford to pay your Alberta Health Care premiums, just fill out some paperwork and you don't have to pay for it. Yet you still get access to the same system that everyone else does.

      Sure, those premiums suck, but it's a trade off for not having a provincial sales tax. In Ontario, you get charged an extra 8% for everything, even used cars, which partially goes to pay for health care. That adds up to a lot more than the health care premium.

      And the ambulance ride is, what, $50? Compare that to $1500 or more in random places in the US.

      Besides, it's not a "free" system, it's paid for by taxes. Different provinces just collect those taxes in different ways.

    20. Re:You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "...force radios to air 60% of french content even though nobody likes french music. "

      Actually, a really good French muscian from the 60's is Jacques Dutronc. Check it out sometime.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    21. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Germany. I pay less than a Dollar for a liter of good beer in the supermarket (admittably it's more expensive at the petrol stations), and about two for half a liter at the nearest pub. Half a liter of excellent Vodka (Moscovskaja) cost about seven or eight Dollars in the supermarket.

      Alcohol prices vary a lot in Europe, from the very expensive Scandinavian countries to the really cheap alcohol prices in the new EU member countries.

    22. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Health care in Canada is not free. You'll find out when you get your first pay check. Some people would even argue it is more expensive in Canada due to insane inefficiencies

      . Regardless, when you are healthy, Canada has the best health care system in the world. If you're dying with cancer or something like that, you'd better start writing your last will and testament because the Canadian healthcare system won't be there for you. How would you like to be in a 6 month waiting list while you're sitting there with an aggressive form of cancer?

    23. Re:You make less by Raagshinnah · · Score: 1

      sorry for replying to my own post but i thought it might be worth mentionning the vile racism against anything american that people seem to have here

    24. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Also, you can take pride in the fact that your tax dollars don't go to humiliating and tortuing Iraqi POW's.


      Gee, I wonder if a Canadian's head comes off as easily as that of a citizen of the USA? You could ask some Iraqis.

      7 out of 150,000. Idiot...

    25. Re:You make less by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      ditto. They could at least only anger terrorists, but no, they engage in a competition to see who can kill more innocents and in the way rape and torture them. Oh, while recording. The world is really a better place with the US army. Thank you

    26. Re:You make less by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I have to pay $92/month for BC medical, on top of my income taxes. That's for 2 people, so it's still a pittance (assuming either of us ever actually need it), but it is annoying.

    27. Re:You make less by jwsmith00 · · Score: 1
      Our tax dollars go to health care and building roads. Oh and servicing the highest government debt of any government in the G-7.
      Did you know that Canada's federal government is in debt about $400 billion US? Then if you live in Ontario, the province is in debt at $75 billion US. So just by moving to Toronto and becoming a Canadian citizen, you share a nice little debt of about $20,000 US per person in government debt. Add annual interest payments on top of that and it costs $1600US per person just to service that debt (eg 8%)

      So Canada may seem like a great country and it is--but we have a lot of problems.

    28. Re:You make less by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      Not quite. You make the same (approx.) numerical amount in Canada and States. And the cost of stuff is roughly the same (numerically), except maybe cars. So you'll have the same lifestyle.

      The exchange rate really only matters if you are saving a lot for retirement and take it back across the border.

      The corporate culture is basically the same, it's the industry you're in that's screwing you.
      (I've worked in Canada, and now I'm in the Valley).

    29. Re:You make less by topham · · Score: 1

      Cold? Not really, I mean, not now.. but the recent snowfall (as in occurring as we speak!) is a bit of a downer.

      Oh well, at-least it isn't -40 any more.

    30. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got to love the two teir health system.
      one for those with money, and the un washed masses

    31. Re:You make less by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "Gee, I wonder if a Canadian's head comes off as easily as that of a citizen of the USA"

      Probably, as I would assume a Canadian head is made of the same things as an Americans head.

      "You could ask some Iraqis."

      I'd actually prefer me head remain where it is.

      "7 out of 150,000"

      I bet that's accurate too. But hey, all is fair in love and war.
      "Idiot..."

      Brainiac...

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    32. Re:You make less by yamla · · Score: 1

      You are kidding yourself if you think an ambulance ride is only $50. My brother had to take several ambulances and he was paying hundreds of dollars per event. He took either two or three, I forget which, and was billed over $2000 here in Alberta. Unless you have a plan that covers it, ambulance rides are completely unsubsidised.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    33. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec is simply a fucked up place, and you can thank the PQ for that (and the French mentality). Move to ON, AB, or BC.

    34. Re:You make less by king-manic · · Score: 1

      The 15% sales tax are provincial and Alberta has none. We have the federal 7% gst and thats it. We also get occasional pre-election kickbacks fromt he government from oil royalties. Our beer is much better, Busweiser is swill and so is coors.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    35. Re:You make less by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Don't employers have to pay you overtime if you work more than 40 hours a week? Personally, I've restricted mine to 32 hours (4 days a week), but I'm not in IT...

    36. Re:You make less by Curtman · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to move to Alberta.

    37. Re:You make less by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Move to Regina, and you only need to make around $47K a year.

      You mean move to Regina and you'll be bored out of your fucking mind.

    38. Re:You make less by Atragon · · Score: 1

      Close, the 15% sales tax that most provinces have is actually the 7% gst (Goods and Services Tax IIRC, a fedaral tax) combined with the Provincial Sales Tax (IIRC) which in Ontario is 8% for a total of 15%. PST does not apply to food or other essentials though.

    39. Re:You make less by king-manic · · Score: 1

      PST and GST. GST is for services and goods that have value added features. Milk is not taxed, A double Latte is.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    40. Re:You make less by Tom2K2 · · Score: 0

      One problem... who wants to live in Regina with its -40 to 50 degree celcius winters! I'm good here in Ottawa with ~-30 thank you very much! :) And by the way, I work for the Feds and I think I work in a very relaxed office environment. I put my 40 hrs a week in, make a pretty good salary, have my cool sports car and live in a decent apartment. (still young... no house yet) sure the tax man gouges me because I live iN quebec and work in Ontario (over 8000$ in taxes this year), but its the price to pay living in the land of free health care, free flowing maple syryp and enough beaver to shake a stick at.. and no I am not talking about the animals ;)

      Sigs away!

    41. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did the mods even read the link?
      Overall Quality of Life &#150; Ranking, Top 10 (New York= 100)

      1 ZURICH Switzerland 106.5 106.5
      1 GENEVA Switzerland 106.5 106
      3 VANCOUVER Canada 106 106
      Offtopic, sure... but I fail to see why this is marked a troll.
    42. Re:You make less by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Don't employers have to pay you overtime if you work more than 40 hours a week?

      Not usually for /.ers. If you're full-time in a white-collar job you're probably cosidered "exempt" (as opposed to non-exempt employees, paid hourly). Exempt employees don't get overtime.

      I believe the rationale is that exempt workers are compensated better anyway and therefore don't need overtime. We get medical, etc. instead. Although frankly I'd rather get paid overtime and have a higher medical deductible.

      Luckily I'm a firmware guy in a chip company. I put in ~45 hour weeks (9-7 M-T, leave 5-6ish on Fridays). Contrast this to the hardware guys who stay till 10pm and come in on Saturdays. And they make the same money I do. But they get free take-out for dinner.

      *That's* just not right. If the project is so important to the company, they can suck it up and hire another engineer. Once in a while I can accept. But the day I start having to routinely come in on weekends is the day I start sending out my resume. I'm compensated well here, but it's hard to put a price on free time or sanity.

    43. Re:You make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, sure... but I fail to see why this is marked a troll.

      Take a look at his name. Anyone posting as Nick Berg's Head deserves to be modded troll.

  38. Same Shit, Different Pile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm sorry to say that you won't find the corporate life all that different. What you will find different (authority: i have worked in the usa and now live in canada) is in canada people don't care as much if you smoke weed or not and think your health care should be free. there's arguably less racism in canada, but a friend of mine once said "at least in the USA they'll be racist to your face". I do believe canadians are less xenophobic, though.

    YMMV

  39. Three Words... by Plake · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..Maple Walnut Dip

  40. Grass Is Greener by Hrolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Generally, variability within different U.S. companies (corporate culture and procedures) is greater than that between the U.S. and Canada (or the U.K., or Australia), so it depends on where you wind up.

  41. PS, what's with the OP's website? by bcore · · Score: 1

    If you visit the OP's website, it appears to be more or less a fansite for Canada.. :)

  42. Re:Socialist Country.... by puppetman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh, I make a six figure income, and my tax rate is around 35%. Yes, every dollar I make over $110,000 is taxed at 50%, but the first $7000 I pay no tax, and the tax rate increases from there. Taxes aren't much worse than California.

  43. French areas by MrIrwin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Can't say much about corporate Canada, but as someone who switched countries when I was 25 I can say there is a lot to be said for going somewhere with a new language and culture. French orientated areas of Canada offer great opportunities for this.

    First few weeks are difficult, but people have a lot of patience if you are seriously interested in learning thier language.

    In a few years you will find that you have not only become bi-ligual, but bi-cultural, you will be able to switch between different ways of thinking, frankly it really broadens then mind.

    Then, who knows, next stop Europe! If nothing else it is a great thing on your CV!

    --

    And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

    1. Re:French areas by rikkards · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I never looked at Quebec as having that distinct of a culture unless you include redubbing most American shows into French as being a culture. I would recommend skipping Quebec and just going to Europe. Once you get into the deep dark depths of Quebec you just have rednecks that speak French.

      Montreal and Southern Quebec is more or less exempt from the above.

    2. Re:French areas by jpetts · · Score: 3, Funny

      but people have a lot of patience if you are seriously interested in learning thier language.

      Please let me know if you would like any help with English spelling.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    3. Re:French areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a point --- certainly it's not as distinct as Europe. Still, Quebec has notably distinct social attitudes and ways of thinking, and well as a fine literary tradition for its size (e.g. Ducharme, Hebert). I know Quebeckers and Western Canadians, and there is definitely a different "feel" to their way of conversation.

    4. Re:French areas by rikkards · · Score: 1

      This is true there have been many famous people who have come out of "la Belle Province" especially in the arts area.

    5. Re:French areas by cperciva · · Score: 2, Informative

      I never looked at Quebec as having that distinct of a culture unless you include redubbing most American shows into French as being a culture.

      Last time I checked the statistics, 20 out of the 25 most watched TV shows in Quebec were produced in Quebec. They have a far more thriving culture than the rest of Canada.

    6. Re:French areas by Rockin'+Az · · Score: 1
      Sorry, I can't agree with you there. As an Australian that lived and worked in Canada for a couple of years, going to Quebec was sometimes very much like going to a "foreign land" (but with a sort of "safety net" of anglophones).

      Having said that, I didn't spend much time in the North, so I don't know much about the French-speaking rednecks. Reading your disclaimer however, I guess I'm not disagreeing with you as much as I first thought.

      I would like to add though, that the predominantly English areas of Montreal are a bit dull. If you go there hang out in the French parts and learn to speak French.

      --

      I come from a LAN down under

      Where the packets flow and routers chunder

    7. Re:French areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like mrirwin is bi curious;)

    8. Re:French areas by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 1

      It's really pathetic to see such a false statement be modded as insightful.

      This dude obviously knows nothing about Quebec. We have a rich culture that includes all major art forms. We have painters, authors, filmmakers, musicians and singers (most are a lot better than Celine Dion I assure you). We publish our own newspapers and magazines. We have a lot of TV channels and they show quality programs made here in Quebec.

      The funniest thing about the comment above is that the rest of Canada actually absorbs a lot more american culture than their own and the trend is growing. A lot (if not most) canadians watch american tv, read american magazines and listen to american artists.

      We do have a distinct culture whether you like it or not!

    9. Re:French areas by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I have lived in Ottawa a good portion of my years so it's not like I don't see a lot of Quebec (I look out my window and look there it is!), I have spent numerous times in Quebec for weeks on end.

      I don't disagree with your second to last statement regarding the rest of Canada as I did spend a 5 of my teenage years in the States and it wasn't a culture shock at all (other than a lot less hockey)

      I just see it that in general Quebec culture has disappeared and is more or less like the rest of us; American culture just translated. Watch Musique Plus and see how much of it is Quebec based compared to the US. I would say that would be a good example of what the future lies for Quebec culture.

      Course when you look at it there is no way to retain culture as society has a tendency to move on to other things. As I said in another posting, Quebec has been known for excellent artists (i.e Mordechai Richler but I wouldn't put Mitsou in there :) )
      From that point I would say yes but I am looking more in how society in whole there is not just the arts.

    10. Re:French areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Then, who knows, next stop Europe! If nothing
      > else it is a great thing on your CV!

      I suggest you write that down as "can put up with Quebecer's shit"

    11. Re:French areas by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      Watch Musique Plus and see how much of it is Quebec based compared to the US.

      I can't remember the exact percentage (40 or 60%), but a huge portion of music programming must be in French in Québec; it's the law.

      --
      :wq
    12. Re:French areas by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      This post having been moderated +5 Insightful make me loose what faith I had left in the Slashdot community.

      -10, Uninformed.

      --
      :wq
    13. Re:French areas by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Actually I would say is that it is Sad. This shows what many people believe of Quebec from the outside.

      It may be true that les Quebecois feel that they do but obviously others do not.

    14. Re:French areas by rikkards · · Score: 1

      That is the one thing I hate about Canada in general. That we have to force something by law rather than by letting the talent of the person (don't bring Britney Spears up, that's a whole other story).

      However lately though there has been a good number of talent that has been successful and getting more exposure. Some people would say it was due to the CRTC imposing the 20% Canadian content, but that doesn't explain their success in the US.

      However I liked Big Sugar and thought they were going places but they broke up because of the Canadian Bullshit that the music industry has put on them. Supposedly "All hell for a Basement" was not played in some Ontario as well as Quebec radio stations because they mentioned Alberta but not the other provinces. Listen to the lyrics it makes sense why not!!

      Also if you have never heard Big Sugar and like good guitar rock hunt down their stuff (www.bigsugar.ca) There is always a chance they will come back though.

  44. You seem to have forgotten ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    mandatory minimum Canadian content radio/TV.

    Anne Murray, Gordon Lightfoot and Rush!

    1. Re:You seem to have forgotten ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with Rush!

      And at least we know which arse's to ship out of here... *cough* Celine *cough*

    2. Re:You seem to have forgotten ... by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      I, for one, would much rather be bombarded with your Rush than with our Rush.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  45. As a Canadian... by SpamJunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It works like this: you get paid less and taxed more.

    In exchange it costs slightly less to live and hostpitals won't turn you away.

    1. Re:As a Canadian... by TykeClone · · Score: 3, Informative
      Just to note - US hospitals can't turn away any emergencies - no matter what their capacity to pay might be.

      And that is as it should be.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:As a Canadian... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Guess you never saw "John Q". Sure, they'll give you a little first aid and send you out the door, but if you need any kind of surgery, forget it.

    3. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a movie.

    4. Re:As a Canadian... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      If you ever visit an emergency room, they have a sign in at least two languages that says that they must, by law, at least stabilize you regardless of your ability to pay.

      If you require attention, you'll get it.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    5. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "John Q" was a movie, dumbass.

    6. Re:As a Canadian... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Stabilize, yes. But perform lifesaving surgery? No.

    7. Re:As a Canadian... by gammoth · · Score: 1

      They will charge you, and if you can't pay, they will go after your assets.

      Of course, even if you have insurance, there's no guarantee the insurance company will pay, or pay the full amount. Both the hospital admin and the insurance company know that you won't have the time nor desire to go through the complex bills and contract minutae, much less enjoy hiring a lawyer and spending time at trial or preparing for trial.

      I've lived under both kinds of systems. Give me national health any day. Here in the US, the insurance companies are playing us like violins.

    8. Re:As a Canadian... by leoxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just be sure to leave a fake name and address when they ask...

      500,000 people in the US go bankrupt every year due to medical costs, thats nearly 2% of the total Canadian population every year!

    9. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all smoke and mirrors.

      In Canada you'll just be put on a 9 month waiting list and you'll be dead before your turn comes up.

    10. Re:As a Canadian... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      How many more go bankrupt for frivolous spending habits and credit cards?

      Much of the high cost of health care is due to non-payers - the hospitals have to make it up somewhere.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    11. Re:As a Canadian... by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh? From the link:

      As members and friends of the Second Unitarian Church of Chicago, we feel compelled to speak out against the tragic, unnecessary death of Chris Sercye. This fifteen-year-old black youth lay for half an hour on the sidewalk adjoining Ravenswood Hospital, bleeding from a gunshot wound. Hospital officials refused to allow employees to carry Chris inside for treatment until it was too late.

      and

      This is health care for profit where people are packed into an under-staffed ER rather than moved to a room. This is the same system that turned away a young mother and her infant because the mother couldn't pay the $25 clinic visit. The child, who was being breast-fed, died of malnutrition. But it's the mother who is being blamed and accused of manslaughter, not the hospital who refused to examine the baby.

      --
      What?
    12. Re:As a Canadian... by TheWingThing · · Score: 1

      But they can turn you away because their Surgeons left the county or don't want to treat high risk cases, due to high malpractice insurance and frivolous lawsuits.

      Neurosurgeons don't treat

      One more...

      Every time a tort reform bill is put forward, it gets shot down in the Congress. I'm in the medical profession too, and it sickens me totally.

    13. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to note - US hospitals can't turn away any emergencies - no matter what their capacity to pay might be.

      Get a clue.

    14. Re:As a Canadian... by Lucius+Septimius+Sev · · Score: 1
      In exchange it costs slightly less to live and hostpitals won't turn you away.

      When do hospitals in the U.S. turn you away? It seems like someone has been reading too many michael moore books. Please step back to reality.

    15. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiiighhht.

      If I pull up in my ambulance and you're in cardiac arrest, they'll treat you. You'll probably die.

      They won't do the lifesaving surgery that would have prevented you from going into arrest in the first goddamn place for free. (Of course, putting down that fucking big mac would have helped.)

      And don't go blaming the hospitals or doctors (well, some of them.) Most of the docs and nurses I see in the ER are overworked and underpaid. And if the hospital looses too much money, NOBODY gets healthcare.

    16. Re:As a Canadian... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      There's a reason that Ravenswood is getting sued.

      What they did was TOTALLY illegal. In the US, a hospital may not refuse emergency treatment. That is the law.

      In the second case, it isn't illegal, because the law states: *emergency* visits. Clinic visits are not ER visits. The hospital did nothing illegal (did they do something wrong... well, I think they should have at least given her information on low-income health care options, but I can't blame them entirely).

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    17. Re:As a Canadian... by Jardine · · Score: 1

      In Canada you'll just be put on a 9 month waiting list and you'll be dead before your turn comes up.

      Bullshit. If you need surgery right away or you'll die (heart bypass, appendix removal, etc) you'll get it. If you need a new knee or hip though, that's when you'll be on a waiting list.

    18. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, even if you have insurance, there's no guarantee the insurance company will pay, or pay the full amount.
      I read about a medical practice where the uninsured patients (including deadbeats that get written off) had a higher collection rate than the insured.
      Give me national health any day. Here in the US, the insurance companies are playing us like violins.
      The US does have a national system: the Feds pay the insurance companies (via the tax-deductability of premiums*) and thereby undercut the free market. The Treasury is paying 25% of health care expenditures to the insurance companies. The insurance bureaucracy is the largest line-item pork barrel project in history.

      * The uninsured have to blow 7.5% of their gross income in a fiscal year before they can start taking a deduction. That amounts to a 30% surcharge for routine health care if you don't have insurance.

      With a financing structure like that, it's no wonder the system is so fucked up.

    19. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ravenswood Hospital is actually a mental health facility, NOT a real hospital, just in case you people were interested in facts.........

    20. Re:As a Canadian... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Is it? Odd, then, that everything I found, including news articles on the event, claim that Ravenswood has an ER and provides ER services.

      That said, the issue (after doing some actual reading on it) was that emergency room workers refused to leave the hospital building to bring him into the ER. In addition, Ravenswood does lack a severe trauma center, which is what gunshot wounds generally require; the nearest trauma center is about 2 miles away from Ravenswood. However, when a police officer finally got sick of waiting for the ambulance to show, and dragged Sercye inside, he got treatment. It didn't do any good, since he basically would have needed emergency repairs to his aorta, and Ravenswood wasn't capable of that.

      Its a real hospital, do some reading.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    21. Re:As a Canadian... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      While I seem to live in an area where medical support is usually provided to even the worst off on a pretty good basis, Ive seen a couple of cases where people reached a lifetime cap with their insuror and were denied care for such obvious problems as Pneumonia, with quickly fatal results. If anything, it's happening more to people who were middle to upper middle class and paid taxes, worked for their insurance, and generally were a productive part of society than to the lifelong poor, who often get better protection.
      People keep claiming that my state can't continue to be this generous to the poorest cases, or it will go bankrupt. Since I have heard governors and legislators from other states, advise us by saying (approximately) "We don't do as much as your state, it would be fiscally irresponsible", I can easily believe there are more people (by percentages) being turned away in those states, but it would seem very doubtful there are less.
      There's certain areas I'd like to see the state cut back (for example, anti-psychotic drugs are generally totally useless if the patient can't or won't stop drinking or using opiates, and they can cost 500$ a bottle, with some doctors being willing to try five or six different ones at once, in the hope that they will do at least a little good. After a certain point, this is gambling on thousand to one shots, and not covering those cases would be just about enough of a change to make the system break even.).
      However, one of the adjacent states won't refer some black lung patients to VA hospitals, even if they meet both such tests as being honorably discharged veterans and having been employed as coal miners for a period of at least 10 years. They have dropped patients from the records for such reasons as the dates of employment being after the various clean air acts supposedly cleaned up the coal mines (which is really an insult to intelligence, considering how many of those mines paid whopping fines after those dates for non-compliance, or just went bankrupt and slipped out of town when they got caught). If a state government is going that far to avoid putting a load on the federal budget, instead of doing what one might normally expect and passing the problem on at no cost to itself, again, that seems pretty clear proof some people are falling through the cracks.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    22. Re:As a Canadian... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ravenswood Hospital is actually a mental health facility...

      Oh, my...that explains why I was born there. My mom must have escaped before the papers were signed.

      --
      What?
    23. Re:As a Canadian... by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 1

      Have you tried to get an MRI lately? It seems as if you have to be dying to get timely diagnosis as well as treatment. Living in a US border city and formerly working in health care, I can tell you that our hospitals receive a steady stream if Canadians from throughout Canada for what we consider routine diagnosis (our hospitals accept Canada's national health). Currently working in dental practices, I can tell you that Canadians come here to pay cash for services that would be paid in full at home.

      Having national health pay the bills must be great, but attending to people's financial needs isn't health care - attending to people's medical needs is. When demand so drastically outstrips supply, it's hard for me to understand how the actual quality of care can avoid degradation.

    24. Re:As a Canadian... by saroth2 · · Score: 1

      But in the US they can take away your house for emergency medical services.

    25. Re:As a Canadian... by SandmanWAIX · · Score: 1

      I saw John Q. You are lieing.

    26. Re:As a Canadian... by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      Just to note - US hospitals can't turn away any emergencies - no matter what their capacity to pay might be.

      Thats true, but if you do manage to survive in the US - wait till you see the bill.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    27. Re:As a Canadian... by Nikker · · Score: 1

      But you dont pay for it after they treat you ;)

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    28. Re:As a Canadian... by gammoth · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the thoughtful post!

    29. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dental care is not socialized here. If you don't have private insurance (which may be provided by your employer or can be purchased directly) you pay cash for dental care no matter which side of the border you get it.

      And a slight nit, government health insurance is provincial, not national. The feds just like to take credit for it, but they cut health funding ten years ago and left the provinces scrambling to make up the short fall. One of the results is cross border trips for MRI because the provinces can't afford to build the capacity. But that will all change if anyone believes the election promise from the current prime minister who was the one who cut health funding when he was finance minister. Can Bono be wrong?

    30. Re:As a Canadian... by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      No, but they can refuse to give the other half of your skull back.

    31. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to note - US hospitals can't turn away any emergencies - no matter what their capacity to pay might be.

      you should read this ("Uncharitable Care: How Hospitals Are Gouging and Even Arresting the Uninsured")

    32. Re:As a Canadian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [T]hat explains why I was born there. My mom must have escaped...

      I hate to break it to you this way, but... well, you've seen Kill Bill 1, right?

  46. Differences can be regional by Dav3K · · Score: 1

    You will find things tend to appear more casual on the west coast (ie. Vancouver) but to call it 'laid back' would be incorrect. Some of the most competitive positions I have held were there. However, dress code tends to be casual. I would compare Vancouver with Seattle - climate is similar, and so is most of the corporate culture.

    The other tech-hub, Toronto, is very similar to most larger US cities and other than subleties, you will find little difference. Both places boast dynamic and competitive markets, and the cost of living is somewhat comparable. (moderately high)

    1. Re:Differences can be regional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good summary. Don't forget Calgary. The economy here is booming, and there is a fair bit of tech work, mostly with or related to oil companies. If you're from middle America and you're a conservative type, the political climate here might suit you best.

    2. Re:Differences can be regional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ummm, if you are going to be listing the "tech hubs" of Canada, you start with Ottawa. Hands-down the #1 place to work in Canada if you are into computers in any way. There is a reason it is called "Silicon Valley North".

      #2 would be Toronto. #3 is up for grabs, possibly Calgary or Vancouver. The market is pretty similar, except it costs less to live in Calgary, and the weather is a whole lot nicer in Vancouver (if you can stand the rain in the winter...)

      If you want a sweet job, with good pay and a low cost of living, get a job at a telco in Saskatchewan or Manitoba. Just don't expect to find much to do in you off hours.

    3. Re:Differences can be regional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... I think the fact that close to 90% of all econmic activity goes through Toronto might actually mean we've got quite a number of tech companies....

  47. Sad News ... Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle, dead at 46 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Actor Fatty Arbuckle was found dead in his New York home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  48. I should ask my co-workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they came here to work.

    Now they are doing their best just to stay employed and remain in the US...

  49. Language differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every sentance ends with an "eh?"

  50. Standard Canadian Joke by SmegTheLight · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fat geeks in Parkas look just as big as skinny geeks in Parkas.. Girls you meet will never know until you get them back to your igloo.

    --
    Time travel is possible. We are quickly heading for 1984.
    1. Re:Standard Canadian Joke by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Fat geeks in Parkas look just as big as skinny geeks in Parkas.. Girls you meet will never know until you get them back to your igloo.

      Ya know, I suspect the girls wear parkas too...

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:Standard Canadian Joke by hardcode · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is /. - just as long as there's a pulse...

    3. Re:Standard Canadian Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. They wise up and check the neck....

    4. Re:Standard Canadian Joke by mclearn · · Score: 1
      Funny sign I saw recently in Vancouver for Columbia winter jackets:

      "In Canada, this is considered lingerie."

      :-)

    5. Re:Standard Canadian Joke by tybalt44 · · Score: 1

      I don't need any sort of pulse, you insensitive clod!

  51. Taxes in California are HIGH by jsimon12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny you would compare it to California, which is one of the highest (if not the highest) in the US ;)

    1. Re:Taxes in California are HIGH by puppetman · · Score: 1

      Because I am familiar with California, and it's a place most geeks can relate to.

    2. Re:Taxes in California are HIGH by durdur · · Score: 1

      California has relatively high income taxes and a high sales tax. It has relatively low property tax rates (because of Prop. 13), although your overall property tax bill may be high if you live in an area with astronomical housing prices, like San Francisco. Overall there are worse states for taxes (New York is one). (Of course the CA governor is choosing to borrow rather than tax his way out of our recent economic difficulties, so you may get soaked eventually).

  52. Much tougher by indros13 · · Score: 1
    Well, the work isn't so bad, but they might not let you read Slashdot at work anymore, eh?

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Much tougher by Columbo · · Score: 1

      No, no. We read slashdot. A lot.

  53. Re:Stay in the United States please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "War on Terror" American probably wouldn't move to Canada, unless required to by his job.

  54. Not quite. by leoxx · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't speak for everyone, but I get paid more than my counter parts in the USA (and I can compare directly, as I am in a services company with employees in the US too). My income taxes are about equal, although sales taxes are higher. Finally, our health care is no worse or better than that in the USA, and costs half as much per person to run.

    1. Re:Not quite. by leoxx · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was better. I said it was "no better, but no worse".

  55. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't sound like the Canada I work in.

  56. Re:Don't Get Sick by Garak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Healthcare greatly varys from province to province. Its not national, its provinical.

    --
    God, root, what is the difference?
  57. Yes, but significantly less ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    beavers armed with handguns.

    "Stay the hell away from my dam or I'll shoot!"

    1. Re:Yes, but significantly less ... by cshark · · Score: 4, Funny

      And watch out for the squirrels with grenades. They don't have much in the way of motor skills. I adopted one. We called him stumpy. .

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:Yes, but significantly less ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Nazi" should be capitalized.

    3. Re:Yes, but significantly less ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I hadn't already posted in this topic, I'd use one of my brand-spanking-new mod points on modding up Funny, there =)

  58. Re:Socialist Country.... by maddskillz · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the 7% GST on everything and your provincial sales tax too

  59. Re:Don't Get Sick by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? Maybe the media source I've seen are biased, but allegedly Canada has more guns per capita than the US does. Of course, this is probably mostly rural folk who have a lot of rifles and shotguns. When you say "guns", do you actually mean "handguns"?

  60. Re:Stay in the United States please. by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

    To quote South Park:

    Dey took are juubbs....

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
  61. Where was capitalism born? by imidazole2 · · Score: 1

    In the US. Thats where it stays.

    --

    -Imidazole2
    1. Re:Where was capitalism born? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you really think capitalism was born in the US, you might want to familiarize yourself with this fascinating resource called a "history book."

      Moron.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Where was capitalism born? by MrIrwin · · Score: 1
      Industrial capitalism was alive and healthy in the north of England at the time of the industrial revolution.

      Leeds, Bradford and Manchester where hotbeds of stockholders buying into new Mill ventures, railways, whatever. The canal and rail building in the UK was akin to the dot com boom.

      Of course capitalist like insurance (as opposed to socialist state protection), was born in London with the Lloyds exchange.

      But non industrial capitalism (trading) goes back much further. Just look at renaisance Venice or the Phonecians in the Roman era. Investors would buy a share in a shipping expedition.

      --

      And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)

    3. Re:Where was capitalism born? by GuyZero · · Score: 1
      If you really think capitalism was born in the US, you might want to familiarize yourself with this fascinating resource called a "history book."

      That was truly an excellent retort. My compliments to the chef.

    4. Re:Where was capitalism born? by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

      and there was me thinking Kirkcaldy was in Fife.

    5. Re:Where was capitalism born? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      :) Thanks.

      <takes a bow>

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:Where was capitalism born? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Ah, I think this is what's called blissful ignorance.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  62. Got a job offer already? by jonesvery · · Score: 3, Informative

    Slightly off topic, I suppose, but you know that the unemployment rate in Canada is currently higher (7.3% April 2004) than the US unemployment rate (5.6% April 2004), right?

    And you're a Canadian citizen or have compelling reason to believe that you'll be offered a work visa (personal connections, obscure and valuable skills)?

    --

    * * *
    It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

    1. Re:Got a job offer already? by Kenja · · Score: 1

      However I dont think the canada numbers are skewed by not counting people who have been out of work long enough to stop getting unemployment or who have had to take a minimum wage job inorder to stay alive. I see and know more unemployed people then the government claims there are, for some reason I trust myself more then them.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Got a job offer already? by Rascasse · · Score: 1

      The statistics aren't easily comparable. More Canadians report their unemployment status because of the social safety net like workfare/welfare, employment insurance and other government assistance programs (i.e. retraining) that are available to them if they do so. Whereas if you're unemployed in the U.S., once your limited social safety net benefits are up, there is less incentive to report to the government about your unemployment status. For instance, how many unemployed high-tech workers bother to go to the government job posting office to check in rather than scouring newspaper ads and the Internet for job postings? I do think Canada has a higher unemployment rate but I don't think the margin is nearly as big as the statistics lead everyone to believe.

    3. Re:Got a job offer already? by tehdaemon · · Score: 1

      I do not trust unemployment numbers too much. Ever looked into how they are figured? At least in the US, they do not mean much.

      --
      Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
    4. Re:Got a job offer already? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Slightly off topic, I suppose, but you know that the unemployment rate in Canada is currently higher (7.3% April 2004) than the US unemployment rate (5.6% April 2004), right?

      Does Canada manipulate the numbers the same way the U.S. does? The U.S. numbers don't include people who have been out of work so long they've given up looking. Nor do they include unemployed IT workers flipping burgers part-time while looking for a job (they are fully employed burger flippers according to the government).

    5. Re:Got a job offer already? by escher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the unemployment rate in Canada is currently higher (7.3% April 2004) than the US unemployment rate (5.6% April 2004)

      Are you aware that the unemployment rate here in the US does not count those who's unemployment benifits ran out and who are still jobless? Unemployment is out of control here. I have friends in Seattle (very smart, determined people) who have been without a job for over 2 years.

    6. Re:Got a job offer already? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      However I dont think the canada numbers are skewed by not counting people who have been out of work long enough to stop getting unemployment or who have had to take a minimum wage job inorder to stay alive. I see and know more unemployed people then the government claims there are, for some reason I trust myself more then them.

      What the hell? Just because your sample size of maybe 50 people includes perhaps 15 unemployed people, this means that the government is wrong and you actually have a better grasp of the situation of an entire country?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Got a job offer already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who have had to take a minimum wage job inorder to stay alive.

      Then you are employed. Is it so hard to grasp the definition?

    8. Re:Got a job offer already? by DeepRedux · · Score: 1
      The US does not depend on people reporting their status to the goverment or on claiming benefits. Instead, 60,000 households are surveyed each month.

      According to the US Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics:

      Some people think that to get these figures on unemployment the Government uses the number of persons filing claims for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits under State or Federal Government programs. But some people are still jobless when their benefits run out, and many more are not eligible at all or delay or never apply for benefits. So, quite clearly, UI information cannot be used as a source for complete information on the number of unemployed.

      The number of unemployed persons in the United States and the national unemployment rate are produced from data collected in the Current Population Survey (CPS), a monthly survey of over 60,000 households. A person's unemployment status is established by responses to a series of questions on whether they have a job or are on layoff, whether they want a job and are available to work, and what they have done to look for work in the preceding 4 weeks.

      The sample survey system of counting the unemployed has been used since 1940. It is also the system used by Canada.
    9. Re:Got a job offer already? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I see and know more unemployed people then the government claims there are, for some reason I trust myself more then them.

      You see and know more than 5% of the US population?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    10. Re:Got a job offer already? by jonesvery · · Score: 1
      Yep, I am. Also know that economists tend to study this sort of thing and publish their results.

      As with pretty much everything that involves trying to make order out of the lives of millions of people there isn't a generally accepted, definitive "correct" answer, but I'll pass along links to a (yes, slightly dated) report analyzing the Canada-U.S. Unemployment Rate Gap and my comment above and

      Something for all of us to share and enjoy... :)

      --

      * * *
      It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

    11. Re:Got a job offer already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good info

      but

      Many nations, including the United States, use both labor force survey data and administrative statistics to analyze unemployment
      http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_faq.htm#Ques14 ( same link as parent post... )

      So there is still room for 'manipulation'

    12. Re:Got a job offer already? by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      I think they're trying to change that title to fully employed burger process control manufacturing engineers, to make it look like theres still some manufacturing left in the US.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    13. Re:Got a job offer already? by SamHill · · Score: 1

      Also, you better hope that your college degree is recognizably in the field you're trying to work. Ten years of experience as a sysadmin don't mean squat to an Immigration Canada official looking at your application for a work permit for a sysadmin job once they see your degree is in anthropology.

      But, damn, Canada (Vancouver, anyway) is a nice place to live.

    14. Re:Got a job offer already? by mr.mighty · · Score: 1

      In Canada, if you're not looking you're not unemployed. You're no longer part of the labour force. If you're flipping burgers, you're employed. However, there are two factors that do increase unemployment stats in Canada vs. the US:
      1) [un]Employment Insurance benefits last almost a year and can be pretty generous relative to US benefits. I know a lot of people don't start really looking for work until the last month or so.
      2) A huge proportion of the male working-age populace is in prison relative to Canada. This apparently accounts for about 1% of the difference in rates (in favour of the US)

    15. Re:Got a job offer already? by stienman · · Score: 1

      I have friends in Seattle (very smart, determined people) who have been without a job for over 2 years.

      Add "and unwilling/unable to move and accept a significant pay cut" to "smart, determined".

      -Adam

    16. Re:Got a job offer already? by the_rev_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Note that the current Administration spent months denigrating the above mentioned BLS numbers when they made the economy look like it was in bad shape and now that it makes it look good they claim it to be the gold standard.

      The "opposition" has been doing the exact reverse, so don't try and claim they're any better.

      I know people in many places, including Denver and Silicon Valley who are now at 3-4 years out of work. I know a ton of recruiters, I know a lot of HR people in a lot of states. It's not getting better.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    17. Re:Got a job offer already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have friends in Seattle (very smart, determined people) who have been without a job for over 2 years.

      What, they too good for Wal-Mart? Sorry, but to be honest, there's a gazillion jobs out there IF THEY REALLY WANTED TO WORK AND MAKE ANY SORT OF MONEY. Might not be a job they WANT, but it's there - they are stupid if they refuse to take one to help out until they land what they want.

    18. Re:Got a job offer already? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Hell, I've probably *slept* with more than 5%.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    19. Re:Got a job offer already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Blah blah blah USA unemployment numbers fudged downwards by evil Republican president "

      "Blah blah blah USA unemployment numbers fudged upwards by evil Liberals"

      Cha, right. Is 5.6% inaccurate? Sure. But please drop the conspiracy nitwittery.

      Have a job? You're employed. Congrats. Be happy you have work, even if it is flipping burgers. I hate my job but every time I see someone worse off I think to myself "it's not that bad."

      Is unemployment worse than it was back in 2000? yes. Why? Because there aren't hundreds of .coms burning through capital and not making any profit. They went buh-bye. Welcome to real life.

      And don't blame politicians for being unemployed. They have relatively little to do with the economy, no matter what they claim.

      And oh by the way, France and Germany have 10% unemployment. Thank your lucky stars unemployment is only 5.6%.

    20. Re:Got a job offer already? by ezHiker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And you know what? There is no legitimate excuse for being unemployed for 2 years in the U.S. You can always find a job. You might not get to work in IT, or any thing else you find rewarding, but the jobs are out there.

      For instance, in my working life, aside from IT work, I have:

      Bagged groceries.
      Worked in a yarn mill.
      Worked in a carpet mill.
      Delivered pizzas.
      Driven a tractor-trailer.
      Driven a garbage truck (including picking up the garbage from the back of the truck).

      I didn't consider any of those jobs particularly rewarding, but they got the bills paid, and I would do them again if I had to.

      Sorry, but I don't have much sympathy for folks who lie around unemployed because they are unwilling to take a job that is "below them".

    21. Re:Got a job offer already? by SamNmaX · · Score: 1
      Slightly off topic, I suppose, but you know that the unemployment rate in Canada is currently higher (7.3% April 2004) than the US unemployment rate (5.6% April 2004), right?

      The major reason for the difference in unemployment is that Canada has a higher natural unemployment rate since a lot of work is seasonal. Changes of season affect a much smaller percentage of American jobs compared to Canadian jobs.

    22. Re:Got a job offer already? by shario · · Score: 1
      That is soooo American, laying total blame on people for their unemployment...

      Be a little more civilized, stop kicking people already on the ground.

    23. Re:Got a job offer already? by stienman · · Score: 1

      That is soooo American, laying total blame on people for their unemployment...

      Perhaps there's a bit of a communication barrier here, but I did not (and do not) lay total blame on people for their unemployment. I do, however, possess some of the 'american spirit' that says 'pull yourself up by your bootstraps'. Anyone can succeed in America.

      Be a little more civilized, stop kicking people already on the ground.

      If offering a suggestion on how to improve your chances of finding a job is 'kicking people already on the ground' then I say more people need more kicking. Although I admit that doing so sarcastically as I did is in poor taste, it only hurts when it's true.

      My father was out of work for nearly two years as well, and had to start dipping into his retirement. I was laid off just before the dot-com bust, and it took me two months to find a consulting position. After another month I had to choose between high pay, high risk, and low pay low risk. I still have a job, and you can probably tell what I chose. I still don't have a degree, and I suspect that if I lost my job now I'd have a terrible time finding work in my field at a salary which would support my family because the field is full of geeks like me who do have degrees and companies can simply cut out those that don't.

      I'm attending school intent on fixing that issue.

      In short, I'm aware of the issues of joblessness in my field. I do wish them luck. I'm very keenly aware of the simple fact that decisions made in the past and at this time sharply affect the future. I guess my problem is that I've simply never been in a situation where I was doing absolutely everything I could and yet could not accomplish what I was attempting to do. Therefore I assume that when someone is not succeeding then either they've poorly defined 'success' or they are not doing their best. This is a failing on my part, one which I'm trying to change.

      -Adam

    24. Re:Got a job offer already? by tybalt44 · · Score: 1

      At a rate of four persons per five minutes, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for 40 years, you could just barely get to 5% of the population.

      I salute you!

  63. One nice thing about working in Canada... by fpp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never worry about my office building/city/town getting targeted by terrorists. That's not to say it won't ever happen, but when was the last time you heard anyone say, "Let's get those damn Canadians"?

    1. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by SniperPuppy · · Score: 0

      The South Park Movie. We still owe you one for Bryan Adams...

    2. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by fpp · · Score: 1

      True. Don't forget Celine Dion. At least she's in the US now.

    3. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?!?! They even made two documentaries about it!

      --
      -CowboyNick
    4. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      That's a side effect of being completely powerless. Antarcticans say the same thing.

    5. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Otter · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of these two women (mother and daughter, I think) I saw in Jerusalem a few months ago, essentially wearing Canadian flags held together by random pieces of clothing. One, apparently feeling her University of Waterloo hat might not be sufficient, had safety-pinned a Canadian flag patch to the side.

      My guess was that they're operating on your theory, as though some half-ecstatic, half-terrified teenager wearing a bomb vest is going to think "Oh, Canada! Single-payer health care, complicated gun registry -- I'd better not blow them up!" I didn't have the heart to point out that they were more likely covering themselves in maple leaf-shaped targets.

    6. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

      when was the last time you heard anyone say, "Let's get those damn Canadians"?

      When someone jammed the vending machine in our office with a Canadian quarter...You have to be really sneaky to get those coins past cashiers since many in the Northern U.S. know that Canadian coins are only worth 70% of the equivalent U.S. coin.

      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    7. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by nacturation · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reminds me of these two women (mother and daughter, I think) I saw in Jerusalem a few months ago, essentially wearing Canadian flags held together by random pieces of clothing. One, apparently feeling her University of Waterloo hat might not be sufficient, had safety-pinned a Canadian flag patch to the side.

      If you've ever done a lot of traveling abroad, you'd be surprised to find the number of *Americans* who stick Canadian flags on their backpacks, etc. The general rule is that Canadians are much better respected globally than Americans for whatever reason.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because of Canada's immigration laws, it's become the North American staging area. Do you know that it's gotten so bad that the govt has started enforcing Sharia law?

    9. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to point this out to you - but last week the Canadian Government warned that they had stopped two major attacks in the last year and that they were in midst of investigating / stopping one more -- more are coming.

      But hey, do as the Euros do, stick your head in the sand, you are safe because you are not American (or until the CN tower comes down ;)

    10. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think its probably their foreign policy actually is a policy rather than unrestrained disguised self interest.

    11. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Malc · · Score: 1

      There was an article in today's Globe and Mail about the possibilities of a terrorist attack in the run-up to a possible federal election this summer. This could be viewed as firing a shot across the US's bows before their presidential election in November.

    12. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I never worry about my office building/city/town getting targeted by terrorists."

      Three words: militant Quebecois separatists.

    13. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by starm_ · · Score: 1

      Went to the CN tower last week. There was a lot of security for enterring. In particular we had to stand in a machine that blew a series of puffs of air at us before we went in. Can someone tell me what was that suposed to detect?

    14. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Disguised"? Hah!

    15. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by C_To · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oddly enough I was talking to a friend about this last night at dinner.

      It blows random particles off and from inside your clothing onto a tray. This tray is then analyzed by a machine to see if theres any dangerous particles (such as major elements to create explosives/bombs). If its detected they then search to see if you are carrying any explosives or what not.

    16. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average Canadian has a lot more power than the average American. It's a nice feeling, having rights and liberties. You can keep the right to hate speech, I'll keep the right against arbitrary arrest and ridiculous prison terms for minor offences.

    17. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by orzetto · · Score: 1

      when was the last time you heard anyone say, "Let's get those damn Canadians"?

      Not so long ago.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    18. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Just in case you're actually serious please tell us: how does all your grand American power make your life better?

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    19. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by gangien · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing a list of Al-Queda's top targeted countries, US was number 1 and I believe UK was 2 and Canada was 4. Anyhow Canada was in the top 5.

    20. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Jardine · · Score: 1

      There was an article in today's Globe and Mail about the possibilities of a terrorist attack in the run-up to a possible federal election this summer.

      Oh, well if the Globe and Mail says it, it must be true. Any mention of specifics or was this just some vague speculation by some nimrod who likes to see his name in print?

    21. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      How about somewhere between Whitehouse 1.0 and Whitehouse 2.0

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    22. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Let's get those damn Canadians"

      Wasn't that a line in the South Park movie?

    23. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > "I never worry about my office
      > > building/city/town getting targeted by
      > > terrorists."
      >
      > Three words: militant Quebecois separatists.

      Bad analogy.

      This is an internal matter, because of things happening inside Canada.

      The closest analogy would be to the American Civil War if anything.

      It is not foreign nationals hating us so much because of our foreign policy, that they want to blow us to kingdom come.

    24. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But hey, do as the Euros do, stick your head
      > in the sand, you are safe because you are
      > not American (or until the CN tower comes
      > down ;)

      First, we are not like the Euros.

      Second, we did not invade another country despite UN opposition, or even internal opposition (like UK and Spain).

      Third, Canada may have its own problems, lousy winter weather being one, but at least they are respected as a peaceful and helping nation abroad, not as a double standrad evil empire run by a bunch of extremist ideologues bent on conquering or subduing the world.

      Fourth, trying to rally other nations into paranoid thinking under the perceived threat of terrorism only serves to make you feel good, but would not change reality that it is your foreign policy that fuels all this hatred from around the world.

    25. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Malc · · Score: 1

      Go and search for it, I can't be arsed. It was on the second or third page of the print edition.

    26. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't worry about it either. Terrorism is not a large problem in the US. We had one big attack three years ago and a few smaller attacks before that. Foreign-initiated attacks are rare, although the most damaging attack ever was foreign. Domestic attacks tend to target the government rather than private interests.

      Perhaps terrorist attacks are less likely in Canada, but I'm not exactly shaking in my boots over here. Anybody that is, get a grip! The odds you'll ever be attacked by terrorists are extremely small. I'd guess on the order of 0.001%.

    27. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by BerntB · · Score: 1
      If you've ever done a lot of traveling abroad, you'd be surprised to find the number of *Americans* who stick Canadian flags on their backpacks, etc. The general rule is that Canadians are much better respected globally than Americans for whatever reason.
      That's sick!

      [Even] I agree that people should be allowed to have any political opinions they want, but generalizing over 290 million people?!

      People are morons.

      Thanks, anyway. My misanthropic tendencies needed a boost. :-(

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    28. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by grimmy · · Score: 1

      It's also a "touch free" way to "pat" someone down..... There's several cameras wich the guards watch, if they see something bulky they then frisk the old way.

    29. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "This is an internal matter, because of things happening inside Canada."

      Never heard of domestic terrorism? Does the name "Timothy McVeigh" not ring a bell? If they intentionally target civillians then they're terrorists, reguardless of where they're from or what their stated goals.

      "The closest analogy would be to the American Civil War if anything."

      For the most part the rebels shot at (and getting shot at by) uniformed federal soldiers instead of, say, kidnapping and murdering members of the civillian government.

    30. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      It's a general rule of thumb, not a universal truth. But, as always, the actions of the few have an impact on the many. For example, if you only knew French people who were obnoxious, pretentious cheese eaters you might think that all French people are like that. Or if you knew some awful Chinese drivers, you might think that all billion+ Chinese people must be universally awful drivers. We have stereotypes just as they do.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    31. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because all the terrorist live in your country and is well known that nobody should shit where he eats baboon!!!!

    32. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what the Spaniards, Indonesians, Pakistanis, Saudis, etc. all said.

      Can't wait to see you get fucked.

    33. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      I should point out for everyone who is wondering how accurate this is that the Globe and Mail is a really right-leaning, conservative paper that regularly suckles upon the Republican Party's collective wang. Anything to appeal to the fanatical right, they can be alarmists in the strictest sense.

      They're heavily eclipsed, circulation wise, by the Toronto Star and are prone to sensationalism to try to get people to buy their paper. They rarely notice real news, and you'd get better information watching CNN then reading the Globe.

      Of course, CNN has all the journalistic integrity of a drunken puppet show at a thai whore house.... but that's another story that I'd rather not explain. :)

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    34. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by sexygirl.jpg.vbs · · Score: 1

      curling season?

    35. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by w3woody · · Score: 1

      You mean besides on South Park?

    36. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is Canada in Bosnia? No one seemed to mind going in despite Russia's objections there.

      Funny how the bar is raised higher and higher whenever it appears the US and the UK may be doing something that affects everyone elses pocketbooks.

      And on the flip side, the UN didn't authorize ANYTHING for Rwanda and Cambodia, and looks to be sitting on its hands in regards to the Sudan. Seems to me, using the UN as the judge and jury of such things is crass and inhumane.

    37. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Now, now, Canadian government appologized for Bryan Adams on several occasions.

    38. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by starfarer42 · · Score: 1
      I never worry about my office building/city/town getting targeted by terrorists.
      As someone who works in Ottawa within a four-block radius of both the Parliament Buildings and the US Embassy, I got to say I do worry a little bit about being bombed.
    39. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame it doesn't apply to you though :-( If you felt 'powerful' you wouldn't need to tell someone else they aren't on /.

      Maybe it's that wife of yours? You sure did embarass her by putting up that picture. Looks like she just sucked her boss's dick before getting that pic taken. And don't you dare tell me you didn't think that too, just for a moment.

      But hey, you're a powerful guy.

    40. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Malc · · Score: 1

      Errr, hang on, haven't you got the Globe and Star the wrong way around in that description? Or are you confusing it with right-wing tabloid rag I wouldn't use if I ran out of toilet paper: The National Post? There is no Republican Party in Canada, although twits like Steven Harper seem to want to be like them... it's the National Post that sucks up to the Albertan extremists, not the Globe. I know because I used to get the post and got fed up with it and it's low tabloid right-wing Albertan arse sucking lack of standards. Not that I've got a problem with Alberta, it's just there's a few more right-wing crackpots there and the Post sucks up to them in an attempt to keep it's circulation beyond the borders of Toronto.

      The Globe can hardly be described as really right-leaning. If it were, why would it publish articles back Jack Leyton (yes, there was one a month or two ago about why he believes Canada should change to a proportional representation system). The Globe is about the only decent broadsheet in Canada... the Star is just another tabloid rag, itself prone to sensationalism. I live in Toronto and I can't bring myself to read the Toronto Star.

    41. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by cfuse · · Score: 1
      If you've ever done a lot of traveling abroad, you'd be surprised to find the number of *Americans* who stick Canadian flags on their backpacks, etc.

      Standard travel advice is to look as unamerican as possible. That way, fewer people will try to molest/rob/kill you.

      What would be interesting to see would be the number of Americans who are suicidal enough to have the American flag displayed. You might as well have a target painted on you.

      The general rule is that Canadians are much better respected globally than Americans for whatever reason.

      That's because they're not fuckheads like most yank tourists are. Americans go to different countries, act like complete dicks, and then wonder why the locals don't love them. Wise up, you're visitors there, why don't you act like it.

    42. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but when was the last time you heard anyone say, "Let's get those damn Canadians"?

      I say that constantly!

    43. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Fuck politics. The reason americans are so universally dispised has nothing to do with oil, or bush, or any other simplification of american politics. The reason that americans are not respected abroad is that they're on the balance a bunch of loud, arrogant, ignorant pricks who'll be the first to complain that things aren't like they are in America.

      That's just the way things are. Most folks don't watch the news, they only know americans from the way they present themselves. If you don't like things being the way they are, maybe you shouldn't let the loud, arrogant, ignorant pricks leave the country, because they ARE ruining it for the rest of you.

      Don't like it? Don't bitch at me, because I'm just telling you the way things are.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    44. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      The National Post is a hilarious rag. I read it every chance I get.

      Why? Here's why:

      Q:What are your opinions on the war in Iraq?
      A:We don't like the liberals. We should've gone.

      Q:What are your opinions on adscam?
      A:Impeach the liberals. We don't like them.

      Q:What can be done about the softwood lumber dispute?
      A:Vote out the liberals. They are to blame.

      Q:Dainish forces have dropped a flag on a canadian island and it's causing a border dispute. What can we do?
      A:Crush Paul Martin. Stupid hippie.

      Q:What's your favourite colour?
      A:not red.

      Q:What do you want to be when you grow up?
      A:not liberal.

      Q:Where were you the night of January 17, 1982?
      A:plotting the destruction of the liberal party!!!

      So as you can see, with their unabashed biases, reading even the most mundane stories becomes fun!! Even worse is that some people think the Post is in the liberals pocket. You'd think they'd choose a different fundamental bias than "Liberals. Evil." if that were the case.

      Anyway, I'm off to read the post. I want to read about how the moon landings were faked because the Liberals are evil. :D

      --
      It's been a long time.
    45. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      Canadians are much better respected globally than Americans for whatever reason.

      Some theories have it that it's because Canada doesn't send its bombers and spies into their countries in order to impose their control over them.

      But yes, I've also seen advertisements for Canadian passports for Americans traveling abroad.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    46. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by BerntB · · Score: 1
      Uhm, you are generalizing over 290 million data points with a large standard deviation...

      Helvete, most of my intellectual idols as a computer nerd are from USA.

      It's the same as here in Europe -- lots of fools worship a ghod, Chomsky or a sport team. Those idiots should get along (according to their religions).

      People that think try to judge by character, humour and personality. (For the record -- even some people that watch sport are OK. Or so they say. :-))

      --
      Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    47. Re:One nice thing about working in Canada... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Like I said. Don't whine at me. I'm just the messenger. You can rationalize all day -- hell, you could convert me into thinking that all 290 million of them are great folks and I should invite them to my next barbeque -- and you'll have changed one mans opinion. Nice going, only 6.25 billion more to go.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  64. What kind of dollars? by runlvl0 · · Score: 1

    Of course, those are CANADIAN dollars. (Today, up to 72 cents!)

    Heck, it's a lovely country! I'd emigrate except for the toilet paper money and their barbaric gun laws.

    Full disclosure: I live in Texas.

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
    1. Re:What kind of dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Heck, it's a lovely country! I'd emigrate except for the toilet paper money and their barbaric gun laws.
      >>
      >>Full disclosure: I live in Texas.

      Emigrate? You could probably overthrow them.

  65. I live in Canada by RobPiano · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would say its much harder to get a job, but the people are pretty nice. I would say you'll deal with the most crap in Quebec. Its hard to set things up as the burecracy is huge.

    If you've got a job, go for it! You'll pay more in taxes than the states, but you'll have a good quality of life.

    1. Re:I live in Canada by Soporific · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess any is better than none.

      ~S

    2. Re:I live in Canada by Malc · · Score: 1

      Higher taxes in Quebec too. I was thinking of moving from Toronto to Montreal and looked at the provincial tax rates. My marginal rate would have increased by 10% to 53%!

    3. Re:I live in Canada by kbarter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is not always the case that taxes will be lower. I worked in California a few years ago, and my taxes were actually higher than Alberta. It really depends on what state and province are being compared.

    4. Re:I live in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only is quebec hard to live in because of all the quebec-frensh issue, the entire city of montreal is getting more and more popular with terrorists. they act like they rule the city. they harass the women, and rude. in my opinion, they're worse than the qubequeers. now imagine having to work with them.

      no, i'm not lying. look at concordia - which is now officially called "terrorist traning school" - at what happened couple of septembers ago when they tried destroying the school just because netanyahu wanted to make a speech.

    5. Re:I live in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree on the tax rate, but we do have more fun! ;))

    6. Re:I live in Canada by zx75 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd agree with that, I'd say you deal with the most crap from Quebec, but Montreal is an absolutely fantastic place if you're actually there instead of on the outside looking in. :)

      --
      This is not a sig.
    7. Re:I live in Canada by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Question: income taxes may be higher in the provinces than in the states, but how do property taxes compare? In the US, they fund schools from local property taxes, which leads to the really obvious degradation of some districts compared to the spectacular successes of the more wealthy ones.

      I won't buy property in Chicago anymore. The taxes on my condo were closing on $7K a year, and would be more like 9K if I had not sold a few years back.

      Can you own a condo or home in Canada without being taxed to death? Another way of saying it: do you fund schools from general revenues, distributed through a per capita formula, or through local levies?

    8. Re:I live in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education is provincially funded from general tax revenues. Expect to pay about 1% of your home's value in property taxes every year, assuming you live in an urban center. This may or may not apply in Quebec, I'm not sure as I live in British Columbia.

    9. Re:I live in Canada by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      I worked in California a few years ago, and my taxes were actually higher than Alberta.

      Not an entirely fair comparison--California taxes are some of the highest (if not the highest) in the nation. Alberta's taxes are easily the lowest in Canada.

    10. Re:I live in Canada by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Alberta's taxes are easily the lowest in Canada

      That cash will evaporate pretty quick when you pay your car insurance, and pay rent. They actually told me insurance would cost $2700 on a 1983 Acadian with a black book value of $300. Once I stopped laughing, I rushed out and got a C-Train pass.

    11. Re:I live in Canada by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 1

      Taxes may be higher in Quebec but the real estate market is way lower. Prices are slowly going up but it still doesn't cost over a grand to rent a one bedroom apartment in Montreal.

    12. Re:I live in Canada by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      I would say its much harder to get a job

      Not to troll...but that's hardly a selling point for the original poster. Most of us slashdotters here are IT folks, and frankly it's hard for me to believe how it can be more difficult to find a job that its been for us in the U.S. over the last few years.

      I've seriously been considering moving to canada as I'm outraged to the point of exhaustion with the current administration, but there's really no plausible way to US->Canada without being able to find employment there.

      Clearly just "moving there" and picking up the want-ads isn't the best way to go. So does anyone have any constructive advice (links?) on how displaced american IT workers can find work in Canada? Has anyone actually done this?

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    13. Re:I live in Canada by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1

      You must be an absolute menace on the roads if they were charging you that.

    14. Re:I live in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Property taxes are dependent on where you live also. As someone who grew up in Illinois and also lived in California I can tell you there are large differences. Chicago alone has 1100 different property tax zones so hard to say.

      California's property taxes are governed by Prop 13 which limits real estate taxes (not including like special taxes for building libraries etc) to 1% of assesed. Assessed is your purchase price and they can only raise valuation by 2%. Quite low!

    15. Re:I live in Canada by hawkestein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can you own a condo or home in Canada without being taxed to death?

      I'm not sure how property taxes compare, but in Canada you can't deduct your mortgage payments from income tax like you can in the U.S., so houses are effectively more expensive (and Canadians have more incentive to pay off their mortgages). On the other hand, some say that houses in the U.S. are just proportionally more expensive than Canadian houses because Americans effectively have more purchasing power when it comes to home ownership.

      --
      -- Will quantum computers run imaginary-time operating systems?
    16. Re:I live in Canada by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Not at all. That was with absolutely no history (from Manitoba) at all, being a 24 y/o male. What I ended up doing was using my parents address in Manitoba to insure through MPIC. Cost me $250/yr.

    17. Re:I live in Canada by druxton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Education is a provincial responsibility, so it varies by province. Ontario used to fund through local property taxes, but has changed to province-wide per capita funding from general revenues, in part because of the inequities you mention. Prior to this, some boards in wealthy areas had built themselves admin complexes with fountains and waterfalls. Some inequities do remain: the funding formula doesn't take into account specific regional requirements, at least not adequately. For example, I live in Northern Ontario and heating costs are much higher than in the southern part of the province, but this isn't addressed in the funding formula (to my knowledge).

      While income taxes sound higher than in the US, they can be much reduced by investing in a retirement savings plan, and the cost of living is much lower. I won't ask what your condo was worth, but mortgage payments on a starter home in many smaller cities wouldn't be much more than you were paying in taxes.

  66. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This does not make sens, its worst then the chewbacca defense, it does not make sens, why would a wooky live on endor you say? For no reason at all, this does not make sens!

  67. Re:Don't Get Sick by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    So 9/11 was all the fault of the gun control lobby and the communists? Anybody else you'd like to blame while you're at it? How about the Jews?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  68. Substantially Similar by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My credentials:

    Canadian born and educated

    moved to the US 10 years ago after finishing my PhD

    worked in the US and Canada as a developer/intern, and in the US as a professor and executive

    Bias: as a child, I was always an American-wanna-be My opinion: Canada and the US are very similar: It is wisely said that Canadians are polite, unarmed Americans, with health care. However, there are interesting differences:

    • Canadians are more "conservative", in the small-c sense of danger-aversion. Canadians by and large will accept an average lower standard of living in exchange for a lower risk of catastrophe. This shows up in substantially lower wages for technical staff, but with a substantially higher standard of living for those supported by the social safety net.
    • There is much less entreprenure-ship in Canada. Go to Canada if you like large companies, because there are a lot fewer start-ups.
    • Republican bullshit not withstanding, the Canadian single-payer health care system works better than anything I have ever seen in the US.
    • Canadians are generally more reasonable and less excitable than Americans. Conversely, Canadians are a lot less exciting than Americans. A Canadian radio station once ran a contest to pick a saying analogous to "As American as apple pie." The winner was "As Canadian as possible, under the circumstances."
    A lot of Canadians have a very poor opinion of the quality of life in the US. I submit that this is because a substantial plurality of Canadians actually live in Southern Ontario, between Buffalo and Detroit. If all you ever heard of the US was that North Tonowanda was burning again, what would you think? :)

    Crispin
    ----
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    CTO, Immunix Inc.

    1. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Born, raised, educated... then you left.

      I bet you'll be back in time to retire, eh?

      Traitor.

    2. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume that this is a TROLL but if not,

      wouldn't you agree that this is just the flip (better) side of out-sourcing?

    3. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      It is wisely said that Canadians are polite, unarmed Americans, with health care...Republican bullshit not withstanding, the Canadian single-payer health care system works better than anything I have ever seen in the US.


      "Polite" Canadians use the word "bullshit", eh?

    4. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Republican bullshit not withstanding, the Canadian single-payer health care system works better than anything I have ever seen in the US.

      Is that why the Ontario government and Princess Margaret Hospital sent more than a thousand backlogged cancer patients to Roswell Park in Buffalo - because of how well the Canadian system works?

      Perhaps that's when they had an opportunity to discuss the state of North Tonawanda - on the drive down ;)

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    5. Re:Substantially Similar by tstoneman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My credentials:
      -Canadian-born citizen
      -been working in the US for the past 5 years in Silicon Valley
      -worked at two large corporations in Toronto

      Almost perfect description, except for health care.

      I'm using Kaiser Permanente in California, and it is an HMO. As a Canadian, you hear the absolute worst things about HMOs, but frankly Kaiser is heads and tails above anything I would ever see in Canada.

      Things like medical tests, responsivitiy, etc are far better here than in Canada. My other Canadian co-workers told me tales of their parents being told to wait for cancer treatment in the East coast, and how pregnant women get way less ultrasounds than here. My own parents wait 3 weeks for their own tests such as looking for things such as colon or stomach cancer. In the US, there would be no such wait, at least with my HMO.

      Canada's health care system is breaking down, and something really needs to be done to fix things.

    6. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Canadians are less excitable, then what's all the bullshit with the extremely broad hate speech laws?

    7. Re:Substantially Similar by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 1

      "No, I'm Canadian.... It's like an American, but without a gun."
      - David Foley {The Kids in the Hall}

    8. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Canadians are more "conservative", in the small-c sense of danger-aversion."

      It must be mentioned that the typical Canadian "conservative" doesn't carry all of the excess baggage that his American counterpart does.

      There isn't much excitement over issues such as abortion rights, creation science, the dreaded evils of Marijuana, arguments over which is the one religion so true that it could be the state religion, or whether military might is a good way to spread "democracy" throughout the entire world!

      In plain words, we are dull, boring but sensible!

    9. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't much excitement over issues such as [...] the dreaded evils of Marijuana True enough - but go smoke a joint in public in any of the maritime provinces, and see what happens.

    10. Re:Substantially Similar by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just think of what he WOULD have said about Republicans if he weren't polite.

    11. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My credentials:


      - Born and live in Canada.
      - Work for services company.
      - Have done business analysis work for various American HMO's
      - Wouldn't trust Kaiser Permanente with giving me a proper band-aid if I cut my finger.

    12. Re:Substantially Similar by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He didn't say it was perfect. He said it was better. Do you want us to believe the U.S. "system" of health care is perfect?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    13. Re:Substantially Similar by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      In the US, there would be no such wait, at least with my HMO.

      As you say, at least with your HMO. Believe me, YMMV.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    14. Re:Substantially Similar by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 1
      Come back to retire? Perhaps. But if so, how is it tratorous to go to America, collect lots of their money, and then bring it home to spend it? :)

      Crispin

    15. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1

      I never said the US system was "perfect" - in fact, I don't think I made any direct claims about the US system at all. Now that you mention it, though, on the "forced to send seriously ill patients to foreign countries for treatment" axis, the US is pretty clearly scoring better than Canada. ;)

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    16. Re:Substantially Similar by maggard · · Score: 1
      Republican bullshit not withstanding, the Canadian single-payer health care system works better than anything I have ever seen in the US.
      Is that why the Ontario government and Princess Margaret Hospital sent more than a thousand backlogged cancer patients to Roswell Park in Buffalo - because of how well the Canadian system works?
      If it's more cost effective then yeah, it's working.

      Seriously,I used to do IT in a leading US hospital, have a buncha buddies at the other local big ones (that's not hard in Boston) and the amount of hardware bought for pure ego and prestige was incredible.

      Did we need a dual-phaser radiation whatsit? No. Did we have the patient demand for it? No. But, but our not-quite-as-prestigious neighbors got one... And the rising young star we're trying to lure from Johns Hopkins wants one... And it would just make our whatever unit just so beyond "world class" we've gotta get one! Heck, once we've got it we'll start running the patients through it like cattle, don't worry.

      Many US hospitals are larded up with lots of shiny "must-have" hardware that honestly not more then one or two hospitals in a region really need.

      In Canada they step back, take a look at that bigger picture and say yeah, it makes more sense to ship some folks down south of the border to use the expensive stuff the 'Merkins bought for themselves and are now desperate for patients to justify. Sure it doesn't make for big bragging points but then universal healthcare kinda trumps the US's horribly broken system, the occasional shiny dual-phaser radiation whatsits notwithstanding.

      FWIW I'm a US citizen, live in Quebec. Now I'm in Montreal but I spent a couple of years living out in the farmlands where I was the anglophone in town. Frankly my experience with the healthcare here has been fine, even considering it's pay-as-you-go in my case. Indeed a heck of a lot better then my US top-tier HMO-from-hell where there were even longer waits for everything, appointments were always at least an hour late, and I co-paid for everything.

      My biggest problem here? The office finding english paperwork for me to sign. Oh, did I mention the last time I saw a doc here (a few years ago for pnumonia) I got in 10 minutes after walking into the clinic, got quality care, and they called my house three times, first time with the doctor and twice more with real nurses just following up on me? Oh, CA$40 for the visit and CA$60 for the pills.

      My advice? Stop listening to the US's big-healthcare underwritten propaganda and ask some folks who've actually used healthcare on both sides of the border, figure out whose getting the better value; both individually and as a society.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    17. Re:Substantially Similar by aggieben · · Score: 1

      This has already been replied to death, but I have 2 cents to toss in like everyone else:

      Republican bullshit not withstanding, the Canadian single-payer health care system works better than anything I have ever seen in the US.

      Uh...right. I suppose that you would also contend that the reason the U.S. has better healthcare for a lower cost than anyone else in the world is that the Canadian healthcare system is funneling us money? If the Democrats in this country get their way, our healthcare will be on par with the Canadian system; it will be worse. I have absolutely nothing against Canada of course, except that the venues for snowskiing in Canada are better than here, but a statement like the above must be responded to.

      Canadians are generally more reasonable and less excitable than Americans.

      That's a pretty hefty generalization; one might argue that making unsubstantiated generalizations is not only a logical fallacy but unreasonable as well.

      --
      Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded. -- Yoda the Retard
    18. Re:Substantially Similar by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Except that he's an ex Canadian. That's a completely different breed. Sometimes I think they move to the US just so they can bitch about Republicans at close range.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    19. Re:Substantially Similar by gr8fulnded · · Score: 1

      That may be so, but how many thousands here in the US can't even get that far due to lack of health insurance?

      They may need to outsource the health care once in awhile, but damned if they still don't get that health care.

    20. Re:Substantially Similar by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      Someone has missed the hundreds of buses filled with the elderly heading over the border to buy perscription drugs.

    21. Re:Substantially Similar by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 1
      Uh...right. I suppose that you would also contend that the reason the U.S. has better healthcare for a lower cost than anyone else in the world is ...
      You're high, right? It is well documented that the US pays more per capita for health care than anywhere else in the world, and for less coverage. Having actually lived under both systems for many years, the US system sucks ass. It is one of the singular ways in which I prefer Canada; in most other regards, I like it better here in the US.

      That's a pretty hefty generalization ...
      No One You Know asked for a generalization about what its like in Canada. Of course the responses are generalizations, and of course generalizations have exceptions.

      Me, for example: No one ever describes me as "polite", only rarely as "reasonable", and quite often as "excitable" :)

      Crispin

    22. Re:Substantially Similar by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And did we forget to mention that Canadians have class?

    23. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      In Canada they step back, take a look at that bigger picture and say yeah, it makes more sense to ship some folks down south of the border to use the expensive stuff the 'Merkins bought for themselves and are now desperate for patients to justify. Sure it doesn't make for big bragging points but then universal healthcare kinda trumps the US's horribly broken system, the occasional shiny dual-phaser radiation whatsits notwithstanding.

      Just keep telling yourself that...

      While Canada is one of the world's top healthcare spenders, it has fallen into the bottom ranks of industrialized countries when it comes to the acquisition and use of high-tech medical equipment such as MRI and CT scanners.

      According to a new study released by the Fraser Institute, a public-policy think-tank, the lack of access to advanced medical equipment could lead to poorer medical outcomes for Canadians, compared with patients in other countries.

      "The failure of the medical technology infrastructure means that surgery and diagnostic procedures are delayed, and this results in declining patient health," said Dr. Bill McArthur, a practicing physician and author of the report, titled The Availability of Medical Technology in Canada: An International Comparative Study.

      Canada is the fifth highest healthcare spender in the 29-member Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as a percentage of GDP. But it ranks twenty-first out of 28 countries in the availability of computed tomography (CT) scanners. The average accessibility among OECD nations is 12.9 CT scanners per million persons, well above Canada's 8.1 scanners per million persons.

      Moreover, Canada is nineteenth out of 27 countries in making magnetic resonance image (MRI) scanners available to the public, and nineteenth out of 22 when it comes to lithotriptors (devices that use shock waves to break down kidney stones, making surgery unnecessary.)

      Generally, Canada is among the bottom third of OECD nations in availability of technology, the study found. The author based his results on information from the OECD, and by comparing British Columbia with the U.S. states of Washington and Oregon. Other sources included the American Hospital Association, the B.C. Ministry of Health, various federal government agencies and interviews with 400 British Columbia physicians.

      According to the report, the smaller installed-base of medical technology in Canada does not reflect a lack of demand for these services. On the contrary, there are waiting lists of weeks to months for many of the major diagnostic and treatment procedures, such as MRIs and CT scans.

      The paper argues that the central problem is an insufficient supply of equipment stemming from deficiencies in Canada's healthcare system, and the way in which purchasing decisions are made, authorized and financed.

      "This pervasive technology deficit points to the need for a serious re-evaluation of the way in which healthcare is funded and provided in Canada," said Dr. McArthur.

      Source.

      My advice? Stop listening to people who tell you you can vote yourself a free lunch.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    24. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      That may be so, but how many thousands here in the US can't even get that far due to lack of health insurance?

      Very few. That's what Medicare and Medicaid do, remember?

      They may need to outsource the health care once in awhile, but damned if they still don't get that health care.

      And they're gradually going broke as a result. Sooner or later, the Canadian system will either be radically revised - including deep cuts in benefits and/or large tax increases - or it will simply collapse under its own weight. There simply won't be enough future Canadians to support the present Canadians as they age - it's the same problem that is coming in the US, except it will be worse in Canada. The writing is already on the wall - it's just a matter of time now, although it's perfectly understandable that many Canadians are in denial about it. Most Americans are too.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    25. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      Someone has missed the hundreds of buses filled with the elderly heading over the border to buy perscription drugs.

      I know, but I didn't want to rub salt in the wound by pointing out how much money Canadians could save by coming to the US.

      Yes, that's exactly what I meant to say.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    26. Re:Substantially Similar by maggard · · Score: 1
      Translation for US'ers: The Frasier Institute is about the same as the US's "Heritage Foundation" and such, a right-wing think tank. I'll believe their position papers as much as I'd trust the Cato Institute.

      general_re, glad you found someone who agrees with your position but it's not mainstream and neither from an unbiased source or one with a great deal of creditability.

      My advice to anyone? Do your own thinking and don't listen without question to anyone who promises you anything. Oh, and those that try and talk down to strangers, usually they're not worth the attention.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    27. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come I dont see any bitching about how the canadians are taking away our jobs. Imagine if the parent poster had been indian or russian.

      oh right ! this is slashdot.

    28. Re:Substantially Similar by joggle · · Score: 1
      Kaiser Permanente service varies from state to state. In some, it's great while in others it's pretty aweful. There was an article about HMOs in a recent Consumer Report article which rated Kaiser at the top (I think it was the California one) and also at the bottom (Ohio?).

      I have Kaiser here in Colorado overall my service has been great. Free flu vaccines (with no wait), simple to set appointments for the next day, etc.

    29. Re:Substantially Similar by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      "the U.S. has better healthcare for a lower cost than anyone else in the world"

      This is the kind of thing that non-americans point at and laugh.. and it makes us think you really are delusional about your own country... the blind belief that everything done the US way is better, and that the rest of the world is a shithole.

      It is widely known that the US has one of, if not THE, most expensive healthcare systems in the world.

      To be fair, Canada is right behind them.

      Look at global heatlh insurance sometime.. coverage for everywhere on earth minus the US & Canada is $X, coverage for everywhere on earth PLUS the US & Canada is $X * 4

    30. Re:Substantially Similar by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      I think you mean to say "how much money people could save by buying generic drugs" Generics aren't available for everydrug, and generics don't always have the same QC

    31. Re:Substantially Similar by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

      Republican bullshit not withstanding, the Canadian single-payer health care system works better than anything I have ever seen in the US.

      As long as you judge by quantity instead of quality.

      There are still far too many foreign nationals coming here for medical care for fear of dying on the waiting list, or dying from second-rate practitioners. :)

    32. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      Translation for US'ers: The Frasier Institute is about the same as the US's "Heritage Foundation" and such, a right-wing think tank. I'll believe their position papers as much as I'd trust the Cato Institute.

      general_re, glad you found someone who agrees with your position but it's not mainstream and neither from an unbiased source or one with a great deal of creditability.

      In other words, you can't refute the material, so you'll attack the source. Nice ad hominem - I hope, for your sake, that you're right and they're wrong. But I wouldn't bet on it...

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    33. Re:Substantially Similar by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      I'm an Australian who used to live in Canada.. the times I recall seeing the doctor, I didn't actually have to pay anything, and the doctor, upon hearing I didn't have a medication insurance plan gave me sufficient "free sample" packs of the medication to complete the dosage.

      The downside was I had to wait about 45 minutes to see her in a darkened waiting room in some university basement, but you can't have everything I guess :)

    34. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      Generics aren't available for everydrug, and generics don't always have the same QC

      Not available for every drug, but enough to make a significant difference for most people, even when compared to Canadian prices. QC, on the other hand, is a non-starter - all pharmaceuticals, generic and brand-name, are subject to the same regulations in their manufacture.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    35. Re:Substantially Similar by maggard · · Score: 1
      In other words, you can't refute the material, so you'll attack the source. Nice ad hominem
      Actually its more I'm not interested enough to get into an extended discussion on this. Indeed, you seem to be trying to debate on this, and as I've already found your tone unpleasent I can't see why I'd bother.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    36. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1

      I can't see why you'd bother either, but there you go. As for my tone, I thought I was being rather mild - next time, I'll try to keep in mind that I'm dealing with a bit of a hothouse flower who doesn't care to have his worldview challenged....

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    37. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea all that "high-tech" medical equipment does me a lot of good when I HAVE NO FUCKING HEALTH INSURANCE. Company can't afford it. We had to choose between paying out of our pockets (employees) an additional $300/mo with reduced coverage -- because between us and my employeer, we were shelling out $500/mo to the insurance company. Sure I still could have had full coverage on eye glasses and contacts (which I have both). However, my hospital deductable would have went from $1000 to $2750. Dental was really cut down. What use to be a $15 co-pay for 6mo checkup, turned into $75 co-pay. Standard filling went up to $150. Then I read in the news paper the CEO just got $95M in stock options and makes over $10M/yr (Thats just the CEO). With my wife on unemployment, we can't afford to keep the insurance. So as a company, we dropped them and are looking for something else. Oh and they told us that due to our small size, the premiums will probably go up an additional 10% in another year. We have about 15 employees here.

      So dont tell me how we have more "high-tech" equipment when I can't afford to even use this "high-tech" equpiment. Oh, and just saying "high-tech" makes you sound like a real fucking dumb-ass loser. Fuck off dickwad.

    38. Re:Substantially Similar by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Now what is this trend of Canadians bitching about republicans? Why do they care? Thats like me complaing about the liberals in England. Not my country, not my problem.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    39. Re:Substantially Similar by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about the portion of the cost that the individual pays, or are you talking about the total cost? When you talk about the total cost the US is the cheapest.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    40. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is for Crispin...you obviously haven't been in Canada for a while.

      Lets see, conservative eh? Marijuana to be decriminalized, gay marriages, better pr0n magazines, and lets not forget Iraq - like come on, Vientam all over again.

      Now, what little hick town did you grow up in? Cuz if you've ever listened to CJAY92 (www.cjay92.com), you'll know why Canadian radio kicks serious ass. The shat those guys pull is awesome and yes, swearing on the radio, all the time. F*CK BEEEPP oops...

      Plus, we got better women!!

    41. Re:Substantially Similar by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 1
      You clearly had no clue what I was talking about, and I even spelled it out for you: "conservative, in the small-c sense of danger-aversion." This has nothing to do with the left/right liberal/conservative meaning. RTFP.

      Crispin

    42. Re:Substantially Similar by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 1

      There is much less entreprenure-ship in Canada. Go to Canada if you like large companies, because there are a lot fewer start-ups.

      uh? I don't know the numbers for the whole country but the last time I checked, in the province of Quebec, 70% of the jobs were in small to medium companies (less than 500 employees).

    43. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Tonawanda was burning again? Like Kent Brockman and the Springfield Tire Fire, to hear Irv Weinstein tell it every night for all my life gives the impression it was never put out, not that it regularly restarted. How many years does it take for one warehouse to burn down?

    44. Re:Substantially Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you knew what I knew about what your HMO does behind the scenes to make your medical coverage so nice, you'd probably move to Canada.


      Here's a hint: that "range" of service you mentioned, it is not by accident.

    45. Re:Substantially Similar by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      In the US, there would be no such wait

      In the US, there's a really big wait, if your industry is being offshored/downsized/cost-cut/etc. and you can't find work or afford decent healthcare.

      I mean, shit. The argument against universal health care seems to be that, in the American privatized model, if you're lucky enough to get a good deal, you're better off.

      Can we be just a bit more holistic and less self-centered about our national policy, please?

      Overall, health insurance (and pretty much any other insurance) is a complete scam. After all, in order for health insurance to work, the majority of people have to pay more for it than they actually use of it. Otherwise insurance companies would go broke overnight. The industry lives off of fear -- fear that you'll suddenly get sick and not be able to pay for the medical care to make you healthy again, for example. Lest healthy people wise up and decide not to bother with health insurance, it's in the health insurance's best interest to keep people afraid. (Hmm, parallels abound.)

      Any country truly worried about keeping its people safe should be more than happy to cover the cost of maintaining it's people's health. We (i.e. our politicians) gleefully spend hundreds of billions of dollars on overseas wars in the name of keeping us "safe"; why can't we spend even so much as one tenth as much money on keeping us healthy?

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    46. Re:Substantially Similar by Sanction · · Score: 1

      No, it is not. Two surveys done by the OECD have shown that US healthcare is twice as expensive as the other surveyed countries in total cost, and does not provide better health care for that money. On average, the quality of care was pretty much the same (one country has better kidney transplant survival rates, another has better heart attack treatment, etc). US health care expenses lead in both individual payment amount and total amount, and also in administrative overhead costs for the insane number of health plans and HMO's.

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    47. Re:Substantially Similar by Sanction · · Score: 1

      Yippiee for them. Unfortunately, according to two recent studies by the OECD, all these wonderful gadgets don't seem to translate to better care. There seems to be a national obsession with gadgets here in the states, but it is a lot like the IT boom. Spend lots of money on IT, only to find out that what you bought doesn't address any problems that needed fixing.

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    48. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      You'd be on to something if all those MRIs and CAT scanners were sitting around gathering dust, but they're not - all those imaging places aren't opening up because they expect to have zero business. Widespread availability makes what used to be exotic and expensive imagery almost commonplace any more, to the point where an MRI is not much more unusual than a simple x-ray. Given the diagnostic value of such things, I say bring 'em on - make MRIs as exotic as dental floss, as far as I'm concerned. The price can only go down, and the quality of care can only go up, the more widespread it becomes.

      But even if you were right, let's look at it from the perspective of a potential patient for a moment. From that perspective, which do you suppose is better - to have an MRI and not need it, or to need an MRI and not have it? Be sure to poll the Canadians as they cross the border for their thoughts....

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    49. Re:Substantially Similar by Sanction · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it is not getting any cheaper, and for all the cost of US health care, twice that of the nations compared to, our care is not any better on average. Yes, it would be nice to have every test that might be helpful, but the money it seems makes a far bigger difference by providing basic and preventative care to all instead of massive and expensive intervention when it is too late for simple measures.

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    50. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the aging of the industrial world - everyone's costs are going up, and there is no preventative care that can forestall getting old. Now, if you want to propose implementing the carousel system from "Logan's Run" for the elderly, I'm listening, but short of that, everyone's going to get squeezed - and the bigger the social safety net is in a given nation, the more it's going to hurt. And the Canadians have a big one.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    51. Re:Substantially Similar by goatan · · Score: 1

      And all those dot com companies that went bust didn't expect zero use what you excpect and reality are diffrent

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    52. Re:Substantially Similar by general_re · · Score: 1
      I'm never going to escape from this thread, am I? ;)

      In that case, the market corrects itself. If there are too many imaging places, and not enough patients to use them, they'll shut down and the number of expensive medical machines will drop. That doesn't hurt me either way, because I didn't pay for the thing in the first place - unlike in countries where the state pays for medical technology.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  69. Re:Don't Get Sick by Garwulf · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Hope you don't like guns, because Canada is rabbidly anti-gun."

    Um...actually, this is very much a nation of hunters. There are LOTS of guns up here. I think the statistic is that there are around 10,000,000 households, and 7,000,000 guns.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  70. Get Sick all you want, and you won't go bankrupt. by leoxx · · Score: 3, Informative
    Don't Get Sick. Or if you do, come south of the border and pay for a doctor in cash. You'll get better service faster than waiting for the Canadian national health service to get around to you.


    Myth. That is simply not true. Canada's health care system is no worse, but also no better than that of the USA.

  71. Open mind? by jargoone · · Score: 1

    That seems like a very drastic action just because you don't like your job. How's this for an open mind: there are companies in America that aren't necessarily like in others in "Corporate America".

  72. Re:Sad News ... Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle, dead at 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I heard he was found in bed with his erect penis shoved into the arse of now-deceased horror writer, Stephen King, 55.

  73. Depends on location by fuelled+by+caffeine · · Score: 4, Informative

    It depends largely on where you end up. The west coast has a reputation for being laid back. Toronto is the hub and seems quite a bit more formal. I am always shocked by how over dressed IT people from Toronto seem. Here in Vancouver I work for a financial institution and almost everyone dresses casually. I imagine that that Quebec and the Maritimes also have quite casual corporate environments, especially when compared to the US.

    I think you will find Canadians more reserved in corporate life or outside of it.

    1. Re:Depends on location by Drakker · · Score: 1

      As a Québecer, I can tell you that it was true before the dot com boom, but now that there's more demand than offer for job, corporations are increasingly pushing for more formal clothing. Even clerks in groceries like IGA are forced to wear a tie.

      A side note, when I started wearing a tie every day, people stopped babbling bullshit about how the systems sucks (windows ;), that we must be incompetent if it BSOD on them and took me much more seriously than just another in house tech support guy. Formal clothing has that magical effect on people's minds... It imposes respect.

    2. Re:Depends on location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In New-Brunswick, you have two possible environments:
      - Working in a call centre
      - Surfing the web at home on EI

  74. Re:Don't Get Sick by UnexplodedNT · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's true. The last guy I saw brandishing a gun got stabbed. Fortunately, we were able to keep the bleeding in check with hockey tape and Tim Horton's muffins. Then it was just a matter of keeping him calm (medicinal marijuana) until his free medical care arrived via dogsled.

  75. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    some people speak French. I think it's because they are under the impression that they are in France. This impression is wrong. They are in Canada!
    So the people of Mexico and half of South America shouldn't speak Spanish because they're not in Spain? Riiiiight!
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  76. Just got back.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..found out about stress leave this visit. If HR comes to fire you, all you have to do is freak out and say you are stressed and they can't fire you. Amazing.

  77. There aren't really many jobs here.... by EoRaptor · · Score: 3, Insightful


    As a job hunting System Admin. in Toronto, I can tell you the job market is pretty crappy. Unless you already have a job lined up, don't hold your breath for a sysadmin position.

    You should also note that jobs in Canada are much more political than jobs in the U.S. Office politics plays a bigger role, and you better be good at the game to get anywhere.

    1. Re:There aren't really many jobs here.... by SWestrup · · Score: 1

      Strange. I'm currently looking for a good IT job and it seems that the only two types that I can find up here in Montreal are ones I'm unqualified for, namely:

      1) Sysadmin
      2) Web designer

      I strongly dislike #1, (nor do I have experience) and I am color-blind and have the esthetic sense of a dead monkey, so #2 is out.

  78. Does this count as self-outsourcing? by vDiver · · Score: 1


    Honestly, I can't see how moving from one country to another in the same basic job is going to be that much different. Perhaps it's time to look at what you're doing for a living?

  79. Same by Cyclone66 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Same shit more tax...

    1. Re:Same by Cyclone66 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That wasn't flame bait.. it's the truth..

    2. Re:Same by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      bastards...

  80. They don't have sys-admins in Canada by nate+nice · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Canada, they don't really use computers. They only have one industry, well two if you want to seperate them, but those are creating snow and creating cold. You see, they just sit up there in their cold factories creating snow all day and then they turn on their giant fans and blow it into places like Wisconsin, etc. They take great pride in this however, because without them people like me might actually be able to walk around more than 4 months out of the year without being wrapped in 5 shirts, a coat, an under-coat, 3 hats, gloves with mittins over them, 5 pairs of socks, furry boots and 15 scarfs wrapped around my entire body. Hey Canada, thanks a lot!

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I hope that you realize the cold can neither be created nor destroyed. Canadians are doing a vast public service by importing the cold from tropical nations. What we get in the us is the surplus cold that the canadians imported to insure that wet T-shirt contests and spring break in cancun remain interesting.

    2. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "I hope that you realize the cold can neither be created nor destroyed"

      The have no regard for thermo dynamics in Canada, just so you know. In Canada, they can make things colder with their custom inverse molecular energy transfer machines. I've seen them.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    3. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's right, up here we don't use computers. I got on my dogsled and crossed the border, found the first Inuit-speaking person that knew how to use a computer, and got them to type this. All the businesses in Canada communicate by people walking around with little bits of polar bear hyde with stuff written on them. The forward radar pickets to detect a flights of inbound soviet bombers during the cold war were really just people stting in igloos listening for the sound of aircraft. The various auto plants up here are not automated, instead of robots we have sticks on strings. Right...

    4. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      "That's right, up here we don't use computers"

      Duh, all you use is the tools in the cold/snow factory.

      "The various auto plants up here are not automated, instead of robots we have sticks on strings"

      You're mistaken, Canada soesn't have auto plants. Just cold/snow factories.

      "Right..."

      Right.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    5. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a sysadmin here in Canada, I can assure you that we have everything we need. Our IT infrastucture is solid, and it works well. We run the same software and hardware you do, and we do our jobs just as well as you do.

      Unfortunatly I have found the following to be true of most American's that I have met or talked with on the Internet. Generally American's seem to have no clue about anything that is going on in Canada. Apparently we are a small unimportant country, of course having a population (country wide) less than New York state is a draw back, so you see us as small and insignificant.

      Being born and raised in Canada, we are constantly bombarded with US junk, we learn about you and your country in school, we know all your states, where to go and where not to go. We learn all your political shit from CNN, which we get as part of basic cable in almost any city in our country. We also get all your major US networks such as TBS, NBC, ABC, etc...

      The USA is good for startup firms, lower taxes, more talent in terms of more applicats to choose from etc... But up here we're generally more happy, and when we leave the office, we're done, that's it...we don't get slave driven to put in that extra 4 hours of telecommuting work via SSH. Only the brown nosers do that... :-o

      Canada and US are the same when it comes to culture, the only difference being that when someone in the US doesn't like you, unlike here they'll tell you to your face, and if you fail to get the point, unlike here in Canada, they'll just shoot you. Up here in my city (Vancouver), we have a local place called Blunt Brothers, where you can legally sit with a cop and smoke a joint togeather. We're very multicultural, with a large east indian and asian population. We embrace other's differences and like the borg, all that distinctiveness gets added to our own.

      Canadian corporate culture is definitly more relaxed, yes we pay more in taxes, but our social programs are second only to Switzerland (I believe they have slightly more social programs than we do). Our prision system rehabilitates with a success rate that is very high (I heard something like 60%). When someone like myself gets laid off, all that tax I paid, well surprise surprise I coast along getting paid 55% of what I earned at my last job until I find something new. In smaller firms, like my last permanent posting, the entire IT team would invite the CTO to come to all you can eat sushi lunches with us. We'd knock back some beers. We even got invites to go drink with the boss after work at his place.

      Canadian's generally seem to be more worldly, we travel a lot, we're polite, we don't resort to violence at the drop of a hat, and we generally resolve differences by comprimising. We keep up with world events and do not shield ourselves from things we don't understand. We embrace change and consider impact of decisions. Note that up here, you can download music legally. You can also marry someone of the same sex. We also don't have a lot of "Ghetto area's" because of those social programs, which are used to educate and find work for those less forunate in our society.

      Now in true american style, get a fucking clue you piss ant and uncover your eyes. I bet you have your fucking truck up on blocks and your probably also a member of the KKK. Eat my ass and get educated!

    6. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're not denying that you're exporting the cold weather?

    7. Re:They don't have sys-admins in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, they don't have senses of humor in Canada, either. Get the stick out of your ass, pal.

  81. Parent is not a troll. by dsanfte · · Score: 1

    That is not a troll, I'm sorry. Asshole mods abound.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  82. How? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Isn't it hard as hell to emmigrate to Canada?

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:How? by severed · · Score: 1
      Actually, it's quite easy for an American to do it. Just hop in a car, or on a plane....

      Getting an apartment, finding a job, integrating with society, that might be a little more difficult...

      --

      HaXXXor.com - Naked Chicks Teach You How To Ha

    2. Re:How? by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      > Isn't it hard as hell to emmigrate to Canada?

      Not so much so for an american citizen, especialy if you have usefull skills. The Canada/US border is hardly even enforced, near where I live it's barely distiguishable from a cattle fence, you can just pull down the wire and step over.

      For a non-american it can be a little more difficult, but it's mainly just a very slow process. I know a family from france where the paperwork etc. took almost 3 years.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  83. Canadian Bacon by Uosdwis · · Score: 1

    Make sure to write all scripts in English and French.

    Watch out for excessive use of the letter 'O', could label you as a US citizen (or the more popular and quite incorrect American).

  84. It's unfortunate that you're moving... by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...we could've used your vote.

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    1. Re:It's unfortunate that you're moving... by alannon · · Score: 2, Informative

      A US citizen living abroad can still vote, as if they still lived in the same county they were in when they were last a resident. If you were never a resident (your parents are American) you can vote as though you lived in the last place THEY did in the US.

      I'm currently in that situation. Unfortunately, it means I get to vote in NY, which is so overwhelmingly Democrat that my vote doesn't really count for anything. I wish I could pick a swing state.

    2. Re:It's unfortunate that you're moving... by mburns · · Score: 1

      Not so! A minority vote always counts for more than a majority vote, since a minority vote can eventually overturn the result. Partisan vote counters always sweat over the additional minority votes.

      Also, voters can count their vote as one on the margin, so votes count for about 20 times more than a naive analysis would indicate. If partisan postions differ by more than 5%, as does happen, then voting is amazingly powerful in an economic calculation.

      --
      Michael J. Burns

      --
      Michael J. Burns
  85. It's a trade off by Minwee · · Score: 1

    You'll pay more taxes, but support fewer wars.

    It's up to you to decide which is more important.

  86. Re:Socialist Country.... by Soko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can understand your (mostly WRONG) attitudes towards Canada, since you were actually raised in a different country.

    That's the point though - Canada is a different country than the US - Canada is not USA-Lite. I don't mind the things you're railing against, since I've decided to accept them as the price of having my country the way it is - which is the country I love. If the poster is willing to accept that things will be different here, he'll come to love his new country, too.

    BTW, try some of the establishments on St. Catherine street in Vieux Montréal - the ladies there will change your mind about Quebecers being unfriendly. ;-)

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  87. Re:Socialist Country.... by norkakn · · Score: 1

    Last I saw (it may have been adjusted) canada was #2 in healthcare while the US was in the 30s

  88. Canada is "nicer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi my name is Noah I'm calling to promote my computer services company IT Goes Click, does your company use computers in you day to day operations?

    Well you're expected to be a lot more polite about everything that's not just a myth and if you're not polite expect to have a polite awakening to your assishness

    Corporations and employees are immeasurably more loyal to one another up here than down there

    There's lots of great holidays and excuses not to work.

    You don't need a benefits plan at work to have great medical coverage

    Your co-workers are now your friends not your competition and your job is now your job not self promotion disguised as a job.

    Incompetence and mistakes are rewarded with a kick in the butt not a promotion

    Everything is far less Political Correct except when dealing with the French or Natives.

    And remember when any product or service is in review it's not new is better it's

    1. If it's new it's bad
    2. If it's old it's probably also bad
    3. If it's foreign it's bad
    4. If it's American it's foreign
    5. If it's cheap it's probably foreign and or new
    6. If it's expensive it's probably American or German see #4
    7. If it claims to work it'd better do it, unless it was cheap
    8. It'd better have French labels on it
    9. If it doesn't work or doesn't have French labels on it, use it to make a donation to an American charity.

    1. Re:Canada is "nicer" by GoClick · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that opening I spell checked in star office while writing a telemarketing script :)

      hehe slimy

  89. CTJ.org - They have some eye-opening stats on taxa by Christ0ph · · Score: 1

    CTJ.org has some pretty interesting statistics on taxation here in the US.
    Check it out.

  90. Grass isn't greener by siffring · · Score: 1
    You've already decided to move to Canada and now decide you might like to know what it's like to work there?

    The grass isn't always greener my friend. If it's corporate BS you're looking to avoid, you don't need to find a new country. You need to find a new (noncorporate) job.

    1. Re:Grass isn't greener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmmmm, I suggest go to Vancouver, and then tell me if the grass is greener, if not greener, it sure as hell has more kick, and the cops won't throw you in jail for puffin.

      Wait, that isn't the grass you meant? Too bad, cuz it is greener!!!

  91. Hate to break it to you by Wehesheit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. but there is no canadian corporate structure, it's all american companies anyways and aside from being a little more lenient towards watching the playoffs instead of working I've noticed nothing different.
    Corporations are an entity unto themselves, I don't think country plays a part.

    --
    This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
  92. Re:Dodging? by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No selective service and no draft in Canada. There was conscription at the end of World War 2 (you know, the one that started in 1939), but it divided the country.

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  93. Consider the entire package... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a Canadian who's currently working in another country (Japan), I'll tell you that's it's not the only corporate culture you should be considering when you think about the move. Sure, in Canada (depending on where you live!) you won't have much of a language problem (Eh!) as you would moving to another country. BUT:

    1. Keep in mind that taxes in Canada are WAY higher than in the U.S.
    2. Canadians in general are poorer than their American counterparts, meaning less money to spend on luxury items like nice cars, etc. (largely related to the tax thing ... harder to get rich because the goverment will pull a Robin Hood on you).
    3. Corporate culture will vary a LOT depending on the company. I worked for 5 different companies while I was still living back home, and let me tell you they varied A LOT, from very relaxed places to very high pressure atmospheres.
    4. You will be a foreigner in our land. You'll have to get a visa and do all that immigration crap.

    But hey, I really like Canada, and when I visit my home country versus visiting the States, I really notice the difference in the culture between the two countries. Canadians are definetly friendlier and more relaxed than Americans (except for New England, what a friendly place!), and I think that's much easier to tell after you spend a few years away. Great country, and I definetly will move back there someday.

    1. Re:Consider the entire package... by HyperCash · · Score: 1

      "except for New England, what a friendly place!"

      Hehe...You've obviosly never been to Boston. :)

      --
      So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
  94. Re:Don't Get Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bullshit.

    I don't know if you're American, Canadian, or from some little island in the Pacific ... but it sounds as though you've been buying the propaganda about the Canadian healthcare system.

    Yes, it's been in better shape. But it's not as bad as some people (mostly those in the US who are trying to justify their system over ours) makes it out to be.

    First: everyone is guaranteed basic health care. Regardless of whether the company you work for has a health plan or not. Compare and contrast to your healthcare system.

    Second: The wait times are usually not as long as people make them out to be. My father recently decided to undergo surgery to alleviate some trouble he's been having lately. How long did he wait between making the decision and having the surgery? 2 weeks. Is my family going to be out $25,000? Nope. Covered.

    Popped into the doctor's office the other day - total wait time for me, 20 mins ... and that was a walk-in without an appointment.

    And I've never heard of Canadians being described as "rabbidly anti-gun" (there are more than a few around here that would take exception to that). We just don't see the need for assault rifles to protect our homes. It's actually a positive thing here.

  95. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by strictnein · · Score: 1

    clearly it was a joke

    what are you, Canadian? :-P

  96. Lower Wages by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    I have a friend that is taking some certification courses in Canada and when he finishes, his sights are set for the United States Economy. When I tell him how much I make freelancing, he cannot even begin to imagine it.

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  97. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Canadian-French is to French as Ebonics is to English"

    Wow, you definitely need to brush-up on your knowledge of history. Start with the colonial times, and then learn about which countries of Europe went to which regions of the Americas.

    Geesh, even for /. this is bull.

  98. Don't Do it by WindowPane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work for a software company that has it's corporate headquarter in Montreal and I find working with my Canadian colleaqes to be quite frustrating. Many of the people I work with never even try to figure out a problem themselves before calling and whining. I know this is not indicative of the whole country but I wouldn't doubt if it was of Quebec. And yes even the French can't stand the Canadian francophones.

    --
    No Brains, No Headaches
    1. Re:Don't Do it by vrioux · · Score: 1

      If your company's headquarter is in Montreal, wouldn't it be normal that most of it's clients are also in Montreal, so most of your support calls actually _come from Montreal_ (and thus are probably half french)? I don't get it. Maybe you don't like your job, but don't get that on the people that you work with or for. That's plain stupid. If I was your boss, you would be fired!

    2. Re:Don't Do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a goddamn flying fuck what the French think? They're generally arrogant, annoying assholes who don't like anybody anyway. I fucking hate the French, and I'm not American.

      And I'm saying this from experience, I'm not just jumping on the Fuck France bandwagon.

  99. move to the centre of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as outsourcing, our dollar is cheaper then the US so we become an outsource country. Try Winnipeg, it has about 700000 people and is very cheap to live, is very multicultural and is home to two large insurance companies (Great west life and Wawanesa) and Investors group. I am sure you could find a job here. Did I mention it is cheap to live here. A decent house costs around 100 to 120k for a 2 to 3 bedroom place in a nice area and to rent a place it is aroun 500 to 700 dollars per month. The converse is Toronto which will run upwards from 500thousand to 1millon for a place in central Toronto (or a two hour commute) or 1500 for a small basement suite. Trust me Winnipeg is not that bad. And by the way our English is slighly different Eh!!!

  100. hardly by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're looking for an interesting way to see what cubicles are like in other countries, by all means this is for you. Otherwise, like he said, it's all the same.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:hardly by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assumedly if you lived and worked in these countries for an extended period, you'd go outside once in a while...

    2. Re:hardly by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I don't live at work. I actually go home every day, and do non-work things in the evenings and on weekends.

    3. Re:hardly by thogard · · Score: 5, Funny

      The main difference in other countries is that they don't use 4 foot pannels to make up the partitions, they use 1.2 meter pannels so you'll find your cubical is some multiple of 3/4 inch smaller.

    4. Re:hardly by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      You must not be all that dedicated.

    5. Re:hardly by constantnormal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, but how many Canadians do they pack into a "standard" cube?

      In my manic corner of corporate Amerika, it's 4 bods per cube, each one with 2 beepers and 2 cellphones in addition to the "desk phone", so you're trying to concentrate amidst a cacophony of beeping madness and cubemates shouting into one of their phones to overcome the general din.

      But we're productive, by God.

    6. Re:hardly by russellh · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I don't live at work. I actually go home every day, and do non-work things in the evenings and on weekends.

      cool! tell us what it's like!

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    7. Re:hardly by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's rather scary, actually... in the current work climate, with my coworkers chasing their tails and working late hours for no good reason, I wonder if I'm going to be the first to get the axe...

      If I could go back in time and tell my younger self something, it'd be to do something that doesn't involve working in a corporation. And maybe to avoid dating certain women...

    8. Re:hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so sure about cubicles in Canada, but in 10 years and 10 or so sites in Scotland, England and Luxembourg I've yet to work in a cublicle (Touch wood, well fake veneer wood :)

    9. Re:hardly by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, where do you work? Sardine Packers Unlimited?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  101. Guns... by joggle · · Score: 1
    Canadians are polite, unarmed Americans, with health care

    I thought Canadians have a much higher gun per capita ratio than the US. Isn't that correct? Also, in the US you'll never be turned away for emergency health care, although you may have to wait in line, get worse service and will be charged for it.

    1. Re:Guns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they do. It's just that the parent is a pinko commie.

    2. Re:Guns... by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

      I thought Canadians have a much higher gun per capita ratio than the US. Isn't that correct?

      Yes, in fact that is true. However we Canadians have more *rifles* and far fewer *handguns* ... IMHO thats part of the gun death statistic discrepancy between oh lets say Detroit and Windsor.

    3. Re:Guns... by Unnngh! · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not so, vis. this study.

      Canadians have about .25 guns/person, the US has about .89 guns/person.

    4. Re:Guns... by gammoth · · Score: 1

      You'll be charged and if you can't pay, they'll come after your assets. Tends to put upward pressure on borrowing rates because people default on loans when they can't pay their medical bills.

      But it's ok 'cause you can pay the higher interest rates with the money you save not subsidizing national health. Works beautifully for financial institutions. They get the dough instead of the tax man.

    5. Re:Guns... by joggle · · Score: 1
      US has about .89 guns/person.

      That certainly seems like a high statistic. I found another page that estimates that there are about 80 million gun owners in the US, which works out to about 3-4 guns per owner.

    6. Re:Guns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You basically can't get a carry permit. Most of the guns owned in Canada are (as far as the government is concerned) owned for hunting, collecting, and target shooting, not protection. If someone is packing in Canada, they're almost certainly either a cop, armed guard, or breaking the law.

      In private, Canadian gun owners may give you a different reason that they own a 12ga, 18" barrel, folding stock pump action shotgun though.

    7. Re:Guns... by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      3-4 guns per owner is probably correct. Note that the Canadian statistics have similar distribution. There are far more guns than gun owners. It is not uncommon for a gun owner to own 10 or more guns. Think about a possible breakdown: handgun, shotgun, target rifle (for shooting at clay plates called birds), hunting rifle. Make the target rifle optional and you have 3-4 right there.

      It's also worth noting that the .25 is disputed. Some claim that the correct number is 14 million guns or about .47 guns per capita. I posted a link elsewhere.

    8. Re:Guns... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      the US has about .89 guns/person.

      Wow, I'd be average if it wasn't for that pesky decimal point.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  102. My experience with a Canadian company by jwsd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Several years ago I got a job offer from a Canadian software company without any interview. I decided to take a look at their office before accepting their offer.

    There were a ton of Dilbert cartoons posted on almost every cubicle wall. The big boss in charge of engineering was a big sexy woman in a rather flashy red dress. I was pretty sure she was not trying to charm the lowly engineers. All engineers I talked to were very timid. It was during the peak of high tech boom, all American engineers I met at that time were beaming with undeserved confidence. But those Canadian engineers didn't have any spirit whatsoever. Enough to say I lost any interest moving up there since then.

    1. Re:My experience with a Canadian company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about?

    2. Re:My experience with a Canadian company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use your brains. Can't you read?

  103. Re:Socialist Country.... by gregmac · · Score: 1

    Just realize you will be paying 50+ percent of your income to the Fed,

    Income tax is based on different levels of income, and while it is fairly high, it's not 50%. You also have to consider other things, like when we get sick, it's paid for, instead of coming directly out of our salary.

    will have subpar healthcare (but it is universal)

    I'm not sure the health care is really any worse than in the US. At least you don't have to be rich to get health care.

    since it is so difficult to fire and hire people

    There are laws that protect people from being fired for no reason, if that's what you mean. It's not very hard to hire someone at all.

    the Canadians LOVE red tape

    As a Canadian, no we don't. Though our politicians sure do..

    most people take there jobs WAAAAYY to seriously.

    I don't know where you get this from?

    Oh and don't forget the French, those whacky French speaking Canadians make the real French seem practically friendly.

    I won't directly respond to this point.. but I will say something that you probably won't even relate.

    Our media isn't QUITE as sensational as American media. I think people can make up their own minds on who they hate and why..

    --
    Speak before you think
  104. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by strictnein · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, you need to brush-up on your knowledge of something called "tongue-in-cheek"

    IT'S A FUCKING JOKE YOU IDIOT

  105. Re:Don't Get Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, actually, we all really like guns, we're just not so much into shooting EACH OTHER with them.

  106. Corporate Life is Still Corporate Life by johnnyfever · · Score: 1
    I'm writing this from my desk at a large Canadian corporation in Canada. It's still a corporation...it's still psychopathic....it still has middle managers (that's the worst one in my opinion :)....it still has red tape, dress codes, codes of conduct and all the other crap that makes a large corporation a large corporation.


    I would agree with the sentiment of some of the other folks ... it's probably not the US that's the problem, it's probably the corporation.


    By and large though, other that the big corporations, Canada kicks ass!

  107. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Canadian-French is to French as Ebonics is to English"

    strange... my friend from France (who speaks English, French, and Spanish) agrees with this statement

  108. You are Canada-fob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just realize you will be paying 50+ percent of your income to the Fed, ...

    Wrong (it's 1.5-2 times less for 100k salaries)

    ... will have subpar healthcare (but it is universal) ...

    Wrong in 'subpar' part. And it doesn't cost an arm and a leg as in some countries.

    ... and will be lucky to find a decent paying job.

    Wrong unless you suck hopelessly. There is a lack of qualified developers and admins as you'd find anywhere. That's qualified professionals, not the ones with interesting resumes.

    With all the weird labor laws in Canada most companies hire contractors rather then actual employees, ...

    Wrong unless you are talking about unionized jobs (such as janitors and bus drivers)

    ... since it is so difficult to fire and hire people.

    Wrong again. Bah, you don't know a bit about things you're talking about.

    And be prepared for MORE bueracracy,

    Well, you guessed it - Wrong, dude. Canadian bueracracy is NOTHING compared to bueracracy that exists in European and Asian countries and is not much different from US practices. ... being a socialist country the Canadians LOVE red tape and most people take there jobs WAAAAYY to seriously.

    Hehe .. aren't you something ?

    Oh and don't forget the French, those whacky French speaking Canadians make the real French seem practically friendly.

    What's this has to do with the move ? Still trying to get over Freedom Fries fever, aren't you ?

  109. Re:Socialist Country.... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    Uh, I make a six figure income, and my tax rate is around 35%.

    I make CA$82K and my average income-tax rate is 19.7%, taking advantage of the RRSP tax shelter.

    Yes, every dollar I make over $110,000 is taxed at 50%

    I believe that's more like a 45% or lower marginal tax rate. But, taxes been slowly going down in recent years. Though, if you make a big pile of cash like that, you ought to set up a private, money-losing personal "business".

    Also, the federal government anyway operates with a budget surplus, so there isn't likely to be a big tax grab if the government changes in the next election.

  110. Well by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    How does Canadian corporate life compare to that of the US?

    My guess would be that in Canada they pile more shit upon you, because they're safe in the knowledge that you will not crack under pressure and come into the office one day with an Armalite AR-10 and take some 7.62mm Nato justice into your own hands.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  111. Re:Dodging? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

    its more of the fact its easier to hide in a foreign country

  112. DON'T WORK FOR YORK UNIVERSITY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst place to work. The more productive you are the less you get paid. If you a forward thinker, you'll get a backward manager shutting all of your ideas down.

  113. Office Parties in America by Deitheres · · Score: 1

    I work in the financial industry. Presently I work for JPMorganChase (you know, the giant freakin bank). Our office parties consist of the company renting out a giant room and having bad catered food AND an open bar. I have worked for a few other major financial institutions (mostly credit-card related), and their parties are the same. I don't know what corporate parties you went to in the US, but I think we know how to party just as much as our friendly maple leaf neighbors up north.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

    1. Re:Office Parties in America by meatspray · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah liquor, off company premesis (where someone else is responsible if you get hurt) is usually allowed for extra special parties at most larger companies in the US.

      I do miss the .com days where I kept 2 bottles of gin and a bottle of mezcal in my file cabinet for the weekly company meetings. (never did like the beer/wine they provided)

      It probably depends mostly on the size of your company, it's legal/financial department and it's management.

    2. Re:Office Parties in America by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      Most definitely this is the case. I used to work for a company back in New England. On Friday's we'd work all day and around 4 o'clock we'd crack open a case of beer and just kick back. It would not be odd for such a thing to happen on any other day either. The management drank right along with us, more like friends than a boss which seems to work because I don't know about you but I'm much more likely to put in extra hours for a friend than a boss I hate.

      I might add the occasion company party involved us all going to a hotel and just getting drunk and stuffing ourselves with all kinds of food. Ahhh I miss that job although I work for another cool company now helping them with their classic car auction.

    3. Re:Office Parties in America by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be adversarial, but we have had company sponsored events/parties, on company proper (in the lunchroom, conference room, and at our desks), where beer/wine was provided. It may not be gin or mezcal, but it's hardly what the parent post was describing.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

  114. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Binary sucks? I have way too much time on my hands.

    !!!

  115. Seeing alot of misinformation... by puppetman · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a Canadian who looked at relocating to California (but didn't, though I flew back and forth for 4 months), I did a fair bit of research into the US/Canada thing.

    Myth #1 - Taxes are really high.
    Reality: not really. You don't pay 50% until you make over $100,000. The average annual tax burden is somewhere around 30-35%. There are provincial and federal sales taxes, however, and you can't write off your mortgage interest. You can, however, put money into a retirement savings plan, and that investment is tax free, and the growth on that investment is also tax free. You pay tax when you withdraw. Also, there are no inheritance taxes in Canada, unlike the US.

    Myth #2 - You have to make $80,000 CDN to have the same lifestyle you had on $60,000 US. Depends on where you come from. A friend who worked in California found that if you made $60,000 CDN, you needed to make $60,000 US to have the same lifestyle - the exact opposite. Cars are more expensive in the US, rent is more expenive in parts of the US, etc. And this is compared to Vancouver, one of the most expensive parts of Canada.

    Myth #3 - the unemployment rate is higher in Canada
    Reality: it's computed differently in Canada vs the US. If people stop looking for jobs in the US (ie they can't find them), then they aren't considered unemployed, whereas they are still counted as unemployed (or perhaps unemployable) in Canada.

    Myth #4 - It's tough to get into Canada
    Reality: if your young, healthy and wealthy (or well educated), you've got a pretty good shot. We have two Europeans working in our office, and both just became citizens.

    Other things to note: health care is essentially free. At worst, you'll pay $100 a month for basic care. Most employers then add extended health and dental. You go to the doctor or dentist you want. None of that HMO crud you see in the US. But because healthcare is public, you have no option of spending more to get better service (ie to use private services). In the US, the more money you are willing to pay, the better the service you will get. But you have to pay the money up front. Families aren't forced into bancrupcy because an uninsured family member comes down with cancer.

    If your wife/girfriend gets pregnant, and she was working and paying taxes and employement-insurance-deductions (most everyone does, unless you are self employeed), she can take a year off with partial pay. Alot different than 6 weeks of no pay that you find in the US.

    In most parts of Canada, you can find true wilderness an hour or less from where you live.

    Expect to see hockey as the national pastime (the national sport is lacrosse, and it's actually pretty popular); forget baseball or basketball unless you live in Toronto. And Vancouver has the 2010 Winter Olympics.

    Things aren't as hyper-competitive as they are in the US, and as a result you'll find it a bit less exciting, but a bit more polite; people hold doors, wait their turn, and say "Thank you" (a Canadian TV show did a skit about a Canadian version of Fear Factor, and one of the things a Canadian had to do was to say "No" to a waiter/waitress when asked if their meal is ok - couldn't do it).

    On the job front, things seem to be improving quite a bit. Canadians tend to work less than Americans. You are more likely to end up in a union (yuk) but sysadmins are usually only in a union if they work for the government. Someone said that Canadians take their jobs way too seriously. I've found it was exactly the opposite. Overall, I didn't see much difference (and I worked in San Francisco during the .com boom) - people are pretty similar, and so are the jobs.

    Finally, the beer. The wonderful beer. I've has some great American beer (Pyramid, Fat Tire, ESB) but in general I like Canadian better (Big Rock, Okanagen Springs, Grandville Island, etc).

    1. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Canadian TV show did a skit about a Canadian version of Fear Factor, and one of the things a Canadian had to do was to say "No" to a waiter/waitress when asked if their meal is ok - couldn't do it).


      I recall seeing a German version of some in-your-face-U.S. show. Didn't go over well. They were filming in a restaurant, a patron walked up to the tv folks, said this was a private party, get the hell out. Cool. Ya would never see that in the states.

    2. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by jonesvery · · Score: 1

      Myth #3 - the unemployment rate is higher in Canada Reality: it's computed differently in Canada vs the US. If people stop looking for jobs in the US (ie they can't find them), then they aren't considered unemployed, whereas they are still counted as unemployed (or perhaps unemployable) in Canada.

      Not quite that simple, though (what is, after all?). I agree that it's not a exact and direct comparison, but my understanding is that through the late 90s and into this decade, a fair number of people who study such things have held the opinion that the Canadian employment market has remained a bit weaker than that in the US.

      A report (now somewhat dated) by Centre for the Study of Living Standards (it's a Canadian organization, before anyone asks) can be found here. While the conclusions as a whole can certainly be read as "well, a whole bunch of economists worked on this report, and we all have different ideas about how to interpret the data," it is worth noting one point from the conclusions:

      5. The further widening of the unemployment gap after 1989 appears to be mainly if not entirely due to the much weaker aggregate economic growth in Canada since 1990. As is documented in Fortin (1996), Canada's recession of 1990-92 -- the most severe since the Great Depression - was both substantially more pronounced and of longer duration than the downturn in the United States. Furthermore, the subsequent recovery has also been weaker in Canada. A straightforward "cyclical" story appears to explain the widening of the unemployment gap in the 1990s.

      --

      * * *
      It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

    3. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      But because healthcare is public, you have no option of spending more to get better service (ie to use private services).

      Of course you can. Just take a little medical "vacation" to the US. They'll be glad to take your money.

    4. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by puppetman · · Score: 1

      I guess that's true. I've read that this last bump in the road hit the US much harder than it did Canada and what US-recovery there has been has been called "jobless".

    5. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by loconet · · Score: 3, Funny

      ......... Your name is Joe, and YOU ARE CANADIAN!.

      --
      [alk]
    6. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 1

      I'm south american. Bolivian-born, lived in Brazil all my life.

      I'm not thinking of getting outta here before my MA in economics, which should happen in 2007. How hard should it be to immigrate to Canada for me by then?

    7. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The unmployment rate is also only part of the picture. One shouldn't look at economic indicators in isolation, as they can be misleading.

      To give perspective, other important indicators are:

      • Economic growth: GDP growth rates in Canada and the US are generally the same. Sometimes Canada grows more, sometimes the US, but the two countries economies are very tightly linked (more so than most Americans know, though you can bet Canadians are aware of it).
      • Standard of living: this is hard to measure, of course, but a number of respected organizations consistently rank Canada near or at the top of the list w.r.t. standard of living and longevity.
      • Distribution of wealth: average income in the US is higher than in Canada; however, the wealth is concentrated in a smaller proportion of the population. The percentage of people living below the poverty line in the US far exceeds that in Canada, dispite what the unemployment rate might lead you to believe. Essentially this means that, in Canada the rich aren't as rich, but the poor aren't as poor.
    8. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are more likely to end up in a union (yuk) but sysadmins are usually only in a union if they work for the government.
      I am a sysadmin for a gov't body in Ontario and I am ineligible to be in a union. All employees are unionized but managers, and all IT staff, actually.
    9. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      ...and what US-recovery there has been has been called "jobless".

      The "jobless" recovery is a misnomer. It was called that by the media to make good news sound like bad news, because bad news sells.

      Part of the perception that the recovery is jobless is because the US had a very low unemployment figure prior to the market correction, and that unrealistic number is being used as a yardstick for the recovery. Also there was a lack of sexy $100,000 per year high tech jobs to report on.

      In short, because it's not the heady days of the late 90's is why the news still talks of a bad (or at best lackluster) economy.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    10. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by g-to-the-o-to-the-g · · Score: 1
      But because healthcare is public, you have no option of spending more to get better service (ie to use private services). In the US, the more money you are willing to pay, the better the service you will get. But you have to pay the money up front. Families aren't forced into bancrupcy because an uninsured family member comes down with cancer.

      This is only partially true. In Alberta (where I live) there is some privitized health care available. It still works differently from the US though. For example, if millionaire Bob wants a CT scan because he bumped his head the other day, he would have to wait at a regular hospital. If he comes up some cash, he can head on over to a private clinic and get a CT scan right away. This way, if Jimmy falls off his bike and breaks his head, they can give Jimmy the CT scan he needs right away rather then having to wait for Bob the millionaire to finish wasting resources.

    11. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by beakburke · · Score: 1

      I'd agree about average not being that meaningful. What would be a good measure is the median, at least in this case. It's my perception that the middle class in the US is slightly better off than in Canada, the rich are way better off in the US, but the poor (bottom 1/3 or so) would be significantly better off.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    12. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Families aren't forced into bancrupcy because an > uninsured family member comes down with cancer.

      I see nobody's picked up on this so I assume it really happens... I have to say, if you have to beg money from relatives and friends to pay for medical care if you get _cancer_ FFS,.. Ijust knocked USA off my mental list of civilised countries. disclaimer: I'm a brit & used to good quality free healthcare (well, reasonable quality ;)

    13. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by mclearn · · Score: 1
      Your myth #3 is incorrect. If people STOP looking for jobs then the unemployment rate is going to be considered artificially low.

      What Canadian business refers to as the "unemployed people" (U) are those people who are NOT working but are ACTIVELY looking for work. People who are "participating" (P) in the job market are actually either working or actively looking for work. Thus:

      P >= Actual unemployment figures >= U

    14. Re:Seeing alot of misinformation... by tod643 · · Score: 1
      *** You can, however, put money into a retirement savings plan, and that investment is tax free, and the growth on that investment is also tax free

      Some minor but important differences between Retirement Plan (RRSP) in Canada vs. 401K Plan in the US is that

      1. $$ that goes into 401K does not count as part of the gross income while RRSP does.
      2. 401K only allows 12% of Gross Income or 13K whichever is less but RRSP allows 20% or 20K ?? (last I remember) whichever is less

      Education is definitely cheaper and better. You don't have Ivy League but lots of very decent colleges at a 1/3 or 1/4 the cost of an equivalent college in the US

      Food is definitely more expensive though

  116. Re:Socialist Country.... by rikkards · · Score: 1

    GST is great if you are your own company. Using the quick method you bill your client 7% but only give 5% to the Government.
    With regards to my taxes, I got an accountant and owed the government 15%.

  117. You will be shocked the first night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't sell beer at gas stations.
    And if you ask them why, they'll answer that this is not USA.

    1. Re:You will be shocked the first night by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Huh ? What are you talking about ? I live in Canada and you can buy beer at gas stations.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:You will be shocked the first night by Vargasan · · Score: 1

      Not in Ontario.
      You can in Quebec, though.

      --
      Putting the romance back into necromancer.
  118. Generalization? Re:Let me tell you how it differs. by otisg · · Score: 1

    This guy must be kidding. Who in the right mind would make such a generalization?

    --
    Simpy
  119. Canada ain't so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work at the largest cable company in Canada as a programmer/analyst and there is nothing to compare to working in the US.

    -People leave at 4:30pm and no one cares about their job.
    -Expect a 7.5 hour workday (and get paid that way too).
    -Expect to pay 50% marginal tax rate, PLUS 15% tax on everything you buy.
    -Free pop? Forget it, feel privileged if you get free
    -Bonuses? Ha! All the money is kept at the top, and little gets distributed to regular people.
    -Merit increases? Ha! Think 2% a year.
    -Expect to see a lot of idiots and assholes working alongside with you because firing people is very hard in Canada. It takes a lot of effort to actually get rid of someone, not like the US, where people can be fired.
    -Christmas parties? Ha! I went to the US for a business trip, and the all-hands meetings for the company I was at had better food than our X-mas party
    -Booze and such is a no-no because every company is so friggin politically correct that they don't want to be sued.

    In the US, more people will care because at least there's a chance that they will become rich. In Canada, everyone is trained to give up at a young age and become corporate drones. In the US, at least there is opportunity, in Canada, there is nothing.

    In Canada you will be taxed to death, the medicare system is worse than the typical HMO, and you will wait months for every treatment. Just ask my co-workers whose parents had to wait for cancer treatment and for ultrasounds for gallbladder stones.

    1. Re:Canada ain't so great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least have some idea what you're talking about. Canada isn't perfect, but:

      "-People leave at 4:30pm and no one cares about their job."

      Well, sounds like you've got a pretty good sample pool. Are you an actual statistician?

      "-Expect to pay 50% marginal tax rate, PLUS 15% tax on everything you buy."

      False. And your use of the term "marginal" shows a lack of understanding of what it means. Marginal is only relevant when applied to everything made above a certain level of income. Average tax rate (i.e., the actual tax I pay) is more applicable to this conversation. I make about $100K, and my average income tax rate is about 30%. Check it out for yourself:

      http://www.ey.com/GLOBAL/content.nsf/Canada/Tax_ -_ Calculators_-_Personal_tax

      There is no doubt that sales tax on after tax dollars increases our overall tax burden to about 50% of earned income, but your numbers would have us paying about 70%.

      "In the US, more people will care because at least there's a chance that they will become rich. In Canada, everyone is trained to give up at a young age and become corporate drones. In the US, at least there is opportunity, in Canada, there is nothing."

      Well, it certainly sounds like you've given up. Good luck with that. I'm busy trying to get rich.

      "In Canada you will be taxed to death,"

      (yawn)

      " the medicare system is worse than the typical HMO, and you will wait months for every treatment. Just ask my co-workers whose parents had to wait for cancer treatment and for ultrasounds for gallbladder stones."

      Well, once again, your statistical skills are outstanding. Using your technique, I say Canada has the best healthcare system in this or any other Universe, because they got me in for an ultrasound in less than a week.

    2. Re:Canada ain't so great by tnmc · · Score: 1

      Informative?! You mean troll, right?

    3. Re:Canada ain't so great by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Wow, where to even start here:

      People leave at 4:30pm and no one cares about their job.
      -Expect a 7.5 hour workday (and get paid that way too).

      This is mostly around Gov't jobs. Imagine that, we work a 7.5hr day and leave at 4:30pm, funny how that works out. As for not caring about their job, well, that depends on the place. I've worked at places where I couldn't wait to get out of, and it probably showed.

      Expect to pay 50% marginal tax rate, PLUS 15% tax on everything you buy.
      Wow, you must have been making over $100K to even come close to that. Someone posted tax rates in Canada above, so I won't repost. I make between $50K and $60K per year, and take home about 64% of my earnings (after pension and union dues). Depending on where you live there can be a 7%-15% sales tax on most things.

      Free pop? Forget it, feel privileged if you get free
      Some do some don't. That's not a big decision maker for me when I look for a job.

      Bonuses? Ha! All the money is kept at the top, and little gets distributed to regular people
      Again, some do some don't. A lot of jobs in Canada are Government or Crown Corporations, so their are no bonuses.

      Merit increases? Ha! Think 2% a year.
      Again, depends on your employer. I've had as low as 2.2% and as high as about 4%. I've known people who regularaly see above 5%.

      Expect to see a lot of idiots and assholes working alongside with you because firing people is very hard in Canada. It takes a lot of effort to actually get rid of someone, not like the US, where people can be fired.
      Has nothing to do with Canada, more likely with Unions. Yes, a union makes it more difficult to fire someone.

      Christmas parties? Ha! I went to the US for a business trip, and the all-hands meetings for the company I was at had better food than our X-mas party
      This is getting tiresome. Guess what, Govt jobs don't pay for big parties. Some private companies do, some don't. Its not a "Canadian" thing.

      Booze and such is a no-no because every company is so friggin politically correct that they don't want to be sued.
      If anything, I'd say the exact opposite is true. It varies, but almost every job I've had, from a McDonald's cook in high school, to tech analysts, and sys admin jobs, I've been out drinking with the boss. As far as lawsuits, Canada doesn't have late night ads for lawyers asking if you fell down and want to sue.

      As far as the rest of your comments, I'm sorry you had a bad experience in Canada. Don't define Canada by what appears to have been a bad employer. Our health system is in need of help, but it is not failing yet. In fact, the upcoming federal election will be centered on health care.

      As far as taxes, standards of living, etc. Take me as an example. I live in Regina (admittedly one of the more inexpensive places to live). I have a mortgage on a ~800 sqft house (excellent condition in a good area) for under $700/month (20 year mortgage), including property tax. I recently got rid of a '99 Olds Alero - purchasing for under $350/month. So there, the two biggest costs of living, for about $1000 per month.

  120. It's way cool ... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... umm, cooler.... really. For example, Winnipeg.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  121. How do you tell... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 2, Insightful


    How to you tell whether the grass really is greener under that 27" of snow?

    Granted, American suburban sprawl sucks, but is making the leap of becoming a member of another nation truly worth it? For example, an important question would be: does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does? I really don't know (not being Canadian), but I do know that the USA is better than Slashdot doomsayers claim it to be.

    Perhaps you simply need a career change? No one is forced into 1-hour commutes to a job they hate. How about moving rural, get a low-paying job, and lay back and enjoy life for a while? Buy a cheap john boat and go fishing for a change.

    Are you sure it isn't your own idealism that you are chasing and never catching? Do you understand that naive idealism begets misery--in any country in the world?

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    1. Re:How do you tell... by puppetman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does"

      Uh, we have a constitution as well. And we have the same rights as you do. But we didn't get it before 1980-something.

      Before that, we had the BNA Act (British North American Act); it didn't really formally promise or guarantee anything, but being a rational, respectful people, we pretty much just agreed to get along and give others the same rights we would like ourself.

      Now, maybe it's time to pick up a book, and learn about the country that does the most trade with the US, provides the most oil and gas to the US, speaks the same language with basically the same accent, and in general has been Americas closest ally (current situation aside). Canadians know alot about America and Americans, and show a fair bit of interest about what goes on there.

      Would be nice to see that feeling reciprocated one day.

    2. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "provides the most oil and gas to the US"



      This isn't correct. It's Saudi, Mexico, then Canada. Then, Venezuela, Nigeria, Iraq, U.K....



      link

    3. Re:How do you tell... by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does?

      I really feel I need to adress this misconception.
      I was raised in the US, and moved to Europe in my teens. Before that, I pretty much had the same question.

      What I soon learned: In the USA, these concepts are extremely hyped. Not that they're not important, but americans tend to think that these concepts somehow are unique to the USA, or unique in importance to Americans.

      It's just not true. The whole western world has pretty much the same attitude on these issues.

      (And this is one of the reasons of US-EU friction:Europeans, not hyping this stuff so much, are more aware that the difference is relatively small, I feel. So when Americans say stuff like this, they percieve it as an american "We're the only ones who truly understand freedom" attitude.)

      The question is how you define 'freedom'? The right to bear arms? Some think this is an important freedom. Most people in the western world, do not. On the other hand, the USA has less freedoms in other ways. Scandinavians are proud that they have the freedom to enter the property of others. (not squatting in someone's front yard, of course, but say, taking a stroll in someone's forest)

      You can't burn the flag in Italy. But some Americans want that too.

      The political difference on the issue of fundamental freedoms varies no more between the US and other western democracies than it does within the US.

      There is a major difference is that the USA has the approach of not changing laws, especially not the consititution, to ban things. Instead, things get handled through lawsuits. So in the USA, you may often have the 'freedom' to do something in the sense that it's not prohibited by law, but on the other hand, you'll get sued into oblivion.

    4. Re:How do you tell... by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does?

      Yes and no. We don't make such a big stink about it, but we have basically all the same rights you do and we actually exercise them about as often.

      We have some politically correct hate crimes legislation that is anti-free speech. But, on the other hand, we don't have a Patriot Act or a DMCA. We don't imprison people without trial, and we don't have secret courts. Most of our government agents don't carry guns. We have no ATF, DEA, or other agency of the week with their guns and their attitudes.

      We do have a fairly obtrusive government with high tax rates. However, we only have 2 income taxes (collected together with the same rules), 2 sales taxes (also sometimes collected together with the same rules). We have all the same bureaucratic BS, government inspectors, license issuers, etc.

      Honestly, overall, I'd say Canada is just as free or more so, in terms of day to day life. For the fringe, we're a lot more free. People comitting victimless crimes are much less likely to be prosecuted, and will do much less jail time (usually none) if they are caught (for smoking dope, for instance).

    5. Re:How do you tell... by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 1
      Hate to bring this up, again, but where was the US from 1939 - 1942?

      Most Europeans know.

      Don't we also have one of, if not THE best electrical system on the planet?

      I think your comment basically sums up everything Canadians dislike about Americans in general.

    6. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that will happen dude.

    7. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does"

      Probably moreso as more and more of American rights are being stripped away daily

    8. Re:How do you tell... by puppetman · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I see it different, also from the DOE:

      "In the first three quarters of 2003, the United States imported more oil (including crude oil and petroleum products) from Canada than from any other country. During the same time period, the United States also imported about 2.5 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of Canadian natural gas, representing 87% of total U.S. natural gas imports."

      and

      "This makes Canada the top petroleum supplier to the United States and the third-largest supplier of crude oil imports (behind Saudi Arabia and Mexico, and ahead of Venezuela). Canada has been the top supplier to the United States of refined petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel, distillate, etc., since 1996."

      Here is the link

    9. Re:How do you tell... by jericho34 · · Score: 1

      Snipped from the constitution act of 1982: 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

      ( a) freedom of conscience and religion

      (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other means of communication.

      (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

      (d) freedom of association.

      it goes on. A notworty clause is it's anti-discrimination section:

      15. (1) Every individual is equal before the and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability.

      No, I'm not a canadian, but I do play one on tv.

      --
      and thus brain shall rule us!
    10. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US has such a strong emphasis on freedom of speech why is it Fahrenhiet 911 won't be allowed for viewing in theatre's? The idea of freedom of speech is a loose term used to make people warm and fuzzy when their government tucks them in at night. If there was true freedom of speech the reporter (sorry can't remember his name) that publicly criticized the Bush administration would still have his job, instead he was fired. I don't think speech is truely free if it is so readily manipulated by corporate intent.

    11. Re:How do you tell... by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      ...is making the leap of becoming a member of another nation truly worth it? For example, an important question would be: does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does?

      Wow, that sounds really triumphalist and ethnocentric. Who can imagine wanting to live anywhere else because the US is the best nation in the world, right? And imagine the horrors of being exposed to strange, inferior cultures that haven't been trampled by Americanism! Why, the very thought of subjection to ideologies that don't concur "in all the same ways" with the ostensible ideals of mainstream America... it's almost too nightmarish to think about!!

      I can do without the rhetoric about freedom which is so selectively, hypocritically, oxymoronically, and contradictively applied.

    12. Re:How do you tell... by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Deeply isolationist, to a point most nowadays cannot imagine.

      Kind of funny when you realize how many people now, both within and outside the US would like to see the US once more become isolationist. The last two times that happened we had those world events from 39-42 you referred to (even earlier if you count Japans conquest of a chunk of Asia) and another called WWI.

      Believe it or not, not all Americans are ignorant of world history. But hey, with Marilyn Monroe and Mohammed Ali getting the attention they so richly deserve in our history books, things can only go...

    13. Re:How do you tell... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      why is it Fahrenhiet 911 won't be allowed for viewing in theatre's?

      At first I read "451", but then saw it was "911". Regardless, no one stopped Mr. Moore from making that movie and seeking distributors. Are there laws stopping this movie, or is it just theatre managers making a choice, which is fully within their right to do? There are "worse" movies out there that are very accessible right at the neighborhood Blockbuster Movies.

      If there was true freedom of speech the reporter (sorry can't remember his name) that publicly criticized the Bush administration would still have his job, instead he was fired.

      Too bad for him, but if your logic is extended, then David Letterman and Al Franken should be paupers...they aren't. If that reporter was irresponsibly stepping outside the bounds of responsible journalism (not simply a matter of free speech), then he probably lost his job for good reason.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    14. Re:How do you tell... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      Wow, that sounds really triumphalist and ethnocentric.

      No, it doesn't. My next sentence was "I don't know". Several other posters have already stepped in to say (effectively) "Yes, Canada fares pretty well in the 'free speech' department." My question was simply a single example of a smart question to ask when facing something as big as moving to a whole new country with different laws and different cultures. The article above was from someone completely polarized over Corporate America, and I felt the attitude of the article's author is probably not well thought through (he/she needs to ask more questions).

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    15. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians only have those rights that Parliament chooses to allow Canadians to have. Those rights are in law, as opposed to the US where the constitution prohibits Congress from interfering with rights.

      Canada has no constitutional prohibitions on Parliament modifying, abridging, or abolishing those rights at any time. Canadian courts have ruled that Parliament has the authority to pass unconstitutional laws.

      Canada has warrantless searches and summary judgements.

      Remember that the US Bill of Rights ends at the border. You do have rights in Canada, but they are different than the rights in the US. They are more explicitly spelled out and less strictly shielded than in the US.

    16. Re:How do you tell... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      Partial list of reasons: ....

      Bush is temporary. The nice thing about term limits is that, at worst, the USA will suffer for eight years. This is already better than suffering for decades under monarchs or dictators. The larger problem is educating voters why they should vote for someone else.

      The "War on Terror" and the PATRIOT act go hand-in-hand. Only due to this arbitrary declaration of war are the rules of society changed for the worse ("enemy combatants"). This is not a normal state for the USA to be in and it is only three years old, now. Hopefully, the "war on terror" will die at age four. Also, all societies are susecptible to decline once war begins agains "terrorists". No nation, including Canada, is immune. The only debate is whether western civilization, as a whole, has reached its peak.

      Regardless, I still feel comfortable that I can say pretty much anything without fear of persecution. I can still travel anywhere across state lines. Libraries are still open to the public. There are no roving bands of gunmen in my neighborhood. Etc. People who live in fear are themselves to blame; don't blame the government for this (reserve the blame for things like overtaxation and pork projects).

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    17. Re:How do you tell... by freaks_and_geeks · · Score: 1
      This isn't meant to be a bash on Canada. I just want to make a point here, because it fits nicely with an article I just read: here (yes, I know it's an msn site, sue me). The point of it is that everyone in Western Europe got along with the US during the Cold War, because, well, they had to. The US was pretty much all that was protecting them from the Soviet Union. Well, I'll lump Canada into that group too. From the 1950's to present, Canada fell under a protective umbrella provided by the US. This was an extremely expensive umbrella, provided essentially gratis.

      In addition, Canada derives many economic benefits from being in a free-trade alliance with the biggest economy in the world. You may look at oil/gas exports to the US as a favor to us. Canada isn't _giving_ fuel to the US -- it's _selling_ it. That probably accounts for a good portion of the trade deficit that we currently experience with Canada.

      Despite this, the sentiment that I see (and feel free to disagree with me here) is that many Canadians look at the US as some sort of necessary evil, or maybe even an enemy. It's hard to back this sort of thing up, but Googling "canada anti-american" will bring up enough links to at least prompt a debate. Here is a good starting point. My point here isn't to demand gratitude from Canadians. But given the benefits that Canada has derived from its proximity to the US, I'd at least expect warmer feelings from up north. You're right -- in the US, Canada is on the fringe of peoples' consciousness. People close to the border make benign jokes about Canada, and those farther away don't really think about it much. But maybe that's for the best. If we paid closer attention, we might lump them in with a chorus of nations (*cough* France *cough*) that seem to reflexively and hypocritically dislike us, and the benign neglect would become animosity.

    18. Re:How do you tell... by Psymunn · · Score: 1

      Another question is does US value freedom and speech the same way they say they do

      Canada has a charter of rights and freedoms (not a constitution, but similar) and the good ol' magna carta
      not to mention legalised gay marrige, medicinal marijunana, and no censorship on most of our mainstream television channels and radio

      we do however limit the use of hand guns but that's okay because no one else has them anyway

      recently freedom of speech in the US has been called into question in many cases. Up hear, Canada is moving in leaps and bounds in giving people freedom of choice provided no one gets hurt

      --
      The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
    19. Re:How do you tell... by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree with you when you say that these values are definitely hyped in American and seen as uniquely America. I also agree when you say that the Western world as a whole, widely respects the same issues.

      But I would actually have to say that to a degree, they ARE uniquelly american--We are shocked by the French banning veils in schools. We are shocked that in Germany nazi paraphanelia cannot be sold or bought, and we are shocked by some of the speech codes that forbid racist, anti-religious, etc speech. That's not to say that we in America are RIGHT, or that such laws wouldn't actually be beneficial here, but we still maintain these rights (mostly from the bill of rights) as fundamental the "Right" thing to do. And I do believe that that is a signifigant difference.

    20. Re:How do you tell... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      > we pretty much just agreed to get along and give others the same rights we would like ourself.

      Unless the person in question is Ernst Zundel, or
      an enemy of scientology, that is.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    21. Re:How do you tell... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does?

      I've got two words for you eh! Patriot Act

      Hmmm...maybe the answer is no, Canada places a higher value on those things!

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    22. Re:How do you tell... by evil-osm · · Score: 1

      does Canada value freedom and speech in all the same ways as the USA does?

      Dude in Ontario we allow women to walk around topless. Who the fuck cares about speech! ;)

      --


      E.

      Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
    23. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and in general has been Americas closest ally (current situation aside).

      That is, when it makes sense...
      Seriously, I think it's quite impressive that Canada stood up and refused endorse the war with Iraq despite the fact that its economy is heavily dependent on the US. Canada is certainly not immune to economic pressure from the US, even if not officially. There are some open trading issues between Canada and the US that highly affect the canadian economy (US borders closed to Canadian beef, tariffs on Canadian wood, etc.). I say Bravo to Canada.

    24. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though the trade is not even...a similar number of Americans derive their livelihood from exporting to Canada. And, yes, with respect to security Canadians benefit from proximity to the US. --- But, I've always found it difficult to truly pinpoint cause and effect when it comes to global politics. What is it that gives rise to external threats (see the current global situation).

      On another note, Canadians were at one point in time instrumental in American might (i.e., nuclear weapons???).

      BTW, our military mandate is changing. There will be more spending...

    25. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... and in general has been Americas closest ally

      I have one thing to say to this - how many of America's closest allies managed to burn down the Whitehouse?

      "And the Whitehouse burned burned burned and were the ones that did it" - Three Dead Trolls in a Baggie

    26. Re:How do you tell... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Uh, we have a constitution as well. And we have the same rights as you do. But we didn't get it before 1980-something.

      You should also note that we do not have DMCA. As well as quite a bit MORE rights than most americans have (ie The Patriot Act).

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    27. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say it's not for lack of want to reciprocate, but where do we stay apprised of Canadian life? I'm sure it's easy for Canadians to sample from the massive number of outlets (both domestic and international) covering U.S. culture, politics, social life, etc., but to be quite honest we aren't exactly getting Canadian channels on Cable TV down here. Part of the reciprocation problem you experience I guess is because of the relative size and difficulty people have in attaching themselves to something distinct about Canada that they should remember or study.

      What would you suggest Americans focus on in trying to get to know Canada better?

    28. Re:How do you tell... by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      Bush is temporary. The nice thing about term limits is that, at worst, the USA will suffer for eight years. This is already better than suffering for decades under monarchs or dictators. The larger problem is educating voters why they should vote for someone else. True about the shrub, but what will you do when he's gone and his atrocious legislation is left behing?
      The "War on Terror" and the PATRIOT act go hand-in-hand. Only due to this arbitrary declaration of war are the rules of society
      Reeaallyy.. And just when was that declaration, eh? Only a fool would believe that the Patriot act is going to go anywhere anytime soon - or that there aren't a large number of individuals who aren't upset at that thought. Vile vile crap but it has about as much to do with a 'war on terror' as invading Iraq.
      Regardless, I still feel comfortable that I can say pretty much anything without fear of persecution. I can still travel anywhere across
      'Free speech zones'
      state lines. Libraries are still open to the public. There are no roving
      Seizure of lending records
      bands of gunmen in my neighborhood. Etc. People
      Soldiers (with unloaded weapons - lol - that trip to dc, via regan national, still cracks me up) in your streets, airports & public spaces
      who live in fear are themselves to blame; don't blame the government for this (reserve the blame for things like overtaxation and pork projects).
      True, true - I blame the incredibly stupid american people (or was that pets? same difference) who sit on their (incredibly obese btw) asses and take such abuses. Not that we're doing such a great job here, but at least we're trying.
      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    29. Re:How do you tell... by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      Canadians only have those rights that Parliament chooses to allow Canadians to have. Those rights are in law, as opposed to the US where the constitution prohibits Congress from interfering with rights.
      Bwahahahahahahaha! We've done a fair bit better protecting those rights then the americans have. Though many examples could be used here I'll leave it at one: 'Patriot act'
      Canada has no constitutional prohibitions on Parliament modifying, abridging, or abolishing those rights at any time. Canadian courts have ruled that Parliament has the authority to pass unconstitutional laws.
      'Patriot act'. So much for those constituitional protections
      Canada has warrantless searches and summary judgements.
      'Patriot act'
      Remember that the US Bill of Rights ends at the border. You do have rights in Canada, but they are different than the rights in the US. They are more explicitly spelled out and less strictly shielded than in the US.
      'Patriot act'.

      True north strong and free

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    30. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are shocked by the French banning veils in schools.

      Most of Europe were bothered about this as well.

      We are shocked that in Germany nazi paraphanelia cannot be sold or bought

      And Germany have a specific perspective on this.

      Lots of countries have a bill of rights. They just say different things. The proposed European Constitution banned the death penalty for example.

    31. Re:How do you tell... by devnullify · · Score: 1

      The CBC is a good start. Lots of good material on their website, and a decent Canadian-centric alternative to the BBC for reasonably responsible news. Specifically, check out their Archives; tons of historical and modern TV articles, most with video footage for download.

      There's also Canoe and canada.com (which I don't particularly like, so won't make a live link to).

    32. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have freedom of speech but racial or hateful speech aren't allowed. Think the good without the bad.

    33. Re:How do you tell... by misterpies · · Score: 1

      "But I would actually have to say that to a degree, they ARE uniquelly american--We are shocked by the French banning veils in schools. We are shocked that in Germany nazi paraphanelia cannot be sold or bought, and we are shocked by some of the speech codes that forbid racist, anti-religious, etc speech. That's not to say that we in America are RIGHT, or that such laws wouldn't actually be beneficial here, but we still maintain these rights (mostly from the bill of rights) as fundamental the "Right" thing to do. And I do believe that that is a signifigant difference."

      And on the other side of the pond, we are shocked that you still have the death penalty (and even more shocked that you use it on mentally retarded people). We're shocked that it's legal to refuse a person medical treatment because they can't afford to pay for it. And I could go on.

      I think your last sentence is very revealing. Fundamentally, the American concept of "rights" is inseparable from the constitution. If the right isn't listed in a 200-year-old document -- or if the constitution doesn't apply (Guantanamo, Iraq) -- then apparently people have no rights. It's as if for Americans, rights are a fundamentalist religion with the constitution for scripture: inalienable, yes, but also inflexible and with no application to unbelievers. As a result, America assumes that any other concept of rights is incorrect and inferior. Perhaps others in the west have a more inclusive notion - that a person's rights derive from his dignity as a human being, not his citizenship, and that the substance of those rights should reflect the society in which he lives, and not mimic those created 200 years ago for a far-away country.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    34. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude in Ontario we allow women to walk around topless.

      What happens if all the pretty women decide to stay warm under layers of clothing and the only women who choose to go topless look like Ms. Chokesondick?

    35. Re:How do you tell... by subVorkian · · Score: 1
      Unless the person in question is Ernst Zundel

      Why would you bring the worst kind of racist into the discussion? He doesn't deserve rights.
    36. Re:How do you tell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets learn about mexico first. I never meet a canadian who knows the name of the president of mexico (one of the most impressive leaders in the world today IMHO).

      The population of mexico city alone is many times more than that of the entire country of canada.

      How many Canadians know the govenor of texas (would have said california but that is too easy now). It is a fair correlation to assume that candians should know this since he governs as many people as does the prime minister (more or less).

    37. Re:How do you tell... by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      We're shocked that it's legal to refuse a person medical treatment because they can't afford to pay for it. And I could go on.

      Actually this isn't true AFAIK--if you show up at an emergency room, the hospital by law has to treat you.

      I think your last sentence is very revealing. Fundamentally, the American concept of "rights" is inseparable from the constitution.

      Not sure I would agree with that--we view the constitution as being the ultimate defender of rights yes, but the constitution has been amended many timesm often to positively enumerate more rights.

      If the right isn't listed in a 200-year-old document -- or if the constitution doesn't apply (Guantanamo, Iraq) -- then apparently people have no rights.

      That's a complete misinterpretation of America and popular views on rights. For one thing, there ARE legal battles being waged over guantanamo bay, and I don't think anyone supports what we have seen come out of Iraq in these recent weeks. The wheels of justice might grind slowly, but grind they do.

      It's as if for Americans, rights are a fundamentalist religion with the constitution for scripture: inalienable, yes, but also inflexible and with no application to unbelievers.

      Totally disagree. Constitution is very flexible, try taking a constitutional law course for instance--you'd be shocked by examples of how the constitution is unchanging, but interpretations change. Likewise, the constitution has 26 amendments. You must also understand about the constitution--it describes a minimum. The writers deliberately avoided a huge complex constitution (such as those being suggested for the EU) in favor of a simple one.

      As a result, America assumes that any other concept of rights is incorrect and inferior. Perhaps others in the west have a more inclusive notion - that a person's rights derive from his dignity as a human being, not his citizenship, and that the substance of those rights should reflect the society in which he lives, and not mimic those created 200 years ago for a far-away country

      I would agree with you here on one pont--yes, most Americans DO think that the American way is best. I do. I'm not saying the European social-democracy path is without merits, but on a philosophical, ideological, and moral level, I prefer the American way.

      no country, not even European ones, are without humans rights violations--as I'm sure you know every example can be turned on its. America wants to liberate Iraq, France wanted to support Saddam. Support a dictator who killed thousands? How does that respect the dignity of human life? Likewise, a contrary argument is quite evident from the recemt torture mess.

      I just want to make clear, I tried to do so in my last post--I'm very definitely NOT trying to make value calls here--I'm just pointing out that there are substantial differences between Euro/American views of rights. And hey, I'll freely admit--I think the American way is the best way--but neither am I neocon.

  122. Dude, You Have a Problem by $criptah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, if you want to move to Canada just because you do not like corporate America, you gotta be bored out of your fucking mind. I do not know how you feel, but I can imagine because I have had the same thoughts; however, I do not plan on moving anywhere.

    There are plenty of companies in the United States that offer excellent benefits and laid back environment. Believe it or not, you can find businesses that offer 100% health and decent dental coverages. You have to know where to look; hint, metrapolitan areas might not be your answer. Look at somewhat rural areas. You might not get a job that pays six figures, but you can score a decent position that does not require a monkey suit and being on call 24x7. Also, you'll get to enjoy less trafic, cheaper housing, more land and maybe you'll learn how to appreciate outdoors. Have you looked at the map of the U.S. lately? Our country is pretty damn large and lifestyle varies from place to place. I hear that some of D.C.'s neighborhoods look like third-world countries; on the other hand, I really enjoyed living in laid-back-not-giving-a-fuck rural area of New England. The choice is up to you.

    Canada is better than the United States only if you are piss poor and/or need medical attention everyday (that is, if you cannot afford it). In the United States healthcare is still affordable; dental insurance plance can be better, but we also do get what we pay for. If you do not like something, go ahead and sue :)

    Finally, if you think that your Canadian boss is going to be nice(er) to you, you're totally wrong. Businesses are here for making profits and no matter what the owner of the company wants to get the money. If your manager has to ride your ass in order to make you efficient, you won't find a place in any country of the world.

    P.S.: Oh, yeah Candians are more polite. Last time I was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I wanted to get laid eventhough I was with my girlfriend.

    1. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Oh, yeah Candians are more polite. Last time I >was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I >wanted to get laid even though I was with my >girlfriend.

      You say this like you think it's some kind of problem. Or something.

    2. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by hether · · Score: 1

      P.S.: Oh, yeah Candians are more polite. Last time I was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I wanted to get laid eventhough I was with my girlfriend.

      I don't know that I'd call that more polite, especially not if I was in your girlfriend's shoes. Perhaps Montreal just has a lot of prostitutes?

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    3. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by arubis · · Score: 1
      P.S.: Oh, yeah Candians are more polite. Last time I was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I wanted to get laid eventhough I was with my girlfriend.


      Okay, I'm convinced. I'll move! Where do I sign up?
    4. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      And which somewhat rural areas are you talking about?

    5. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S.: Oh, yeah Candians are more polite. Last time I was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I wanted to get laid eventhough I was with my girlfriend.

      They're called hookers.

    6. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by demachina · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having lived in both places I'm at a loss to know how this got moded to a 5. Its more like a troll by American who just has no appreciation for the good parts of life in Canada. There is a lot less violent crime just for starters. The pubs are generally a lot friendlier, the beer is waaayyy better. If you live in Toronto and go to a pub is pretty easy to spot the American's over the border for the weekend because they tend towards rude, pushy and snotty.

      You kind of know its a troll when you hit "In the United States healthcare is still affordable". You've obviously never spent any time in a American hospital without insurance. It will cost you at least $20K for a week for something not major. I'm doubting you've paid for your own insurance either. If your company's paying for most of it you might lack an appreciation for how much it costs and how fast the rates are going up, especially in states with serious malpractice litigation problems. I think everyone knows the cost of healthcare and drugs is spiraling out of control in the U.S. and its probably one of the biggest threats to U.S. global competitiveness since most countries have socialized healthcare to one degree or another and they don't have corporations draining the life out the economy. Sure healthcare in the U.S. is great if you are rich or have gold plated insurance, its OK if you have Medicare, but if you are among the 40 million uninsured you are one illness away from bankruptcy.

      It is the truth you may hit a boss who is a dick in the the U.S. or Canada. I have had bosses who are dicks who are American, Canadian and Indian but my experience is the American bosses are way more likely to be dicks than the Canadians. The Candian engineers I've worked with have been on average far better to work with. There is substantially less back stabbing, and climbing over your coworker to get to the top than there is in the U.S.

      As I said a few weeks ago, the U.S. has a problem with its culture, education, media, military/gun obsession that is tending to cultivate a people who have a real tendency to be arrogant and ignorant which is a dangerous combination. Its not a surprise to most of the world that Bush is the President since he is the poster boy for arrogant and ignorant.

      --
      @de_machina
    7. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by WerewolfOfVulcan · · Score: 2
      I've worked in IT for a non-profit in Tennessee since 1995 (following 11 years in various corpie jobs). I'm making significantly less than just about *any* of my for-profit peers, but I have some rather groovy non-monetary benefits, including:
      • roughly 6 weeks per year paid vacation, including 10-14 days off from Christmas to New Year's Day.
      • an additional 6 days per year sick time
      • the authority to work at home at my discretion
      • near-autonomy in identifying and executing projects (if I have to buy something, I have to get approval)
      • a CEO who prefers that you NOT come to work if you're sick, lets you stay home to take care of your kids if *they* are, and answers to a Board of Directors that are *all* volunteers
      • I get to go to at least one conference per year (usually USENIX) and I'm allowed to take a train, even if the trip takes three days there and back for a five-day conference (I don't fly)


      The list goes on.

      Try a non-profit. You may find it was worth it.

    8. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL That's Montreal for you, the night life rocks and if you want to get laid, not a problem! Especially the french girls here. >=)

      I have to say though, Montreal (Quebec) and even Ontario (Toronto, Ottawa, etc.) are much, much less polite than out West such as Vancouver (British Columbia) and Calgary or Edmonton (Alberta). I've lived in all areas and was actually born in Montreal. The french government are indeed fu**'ed up; things have changed a lot in the last ten years but still, Montreal I would have to say is the most fun - Toronto second? Montreal is definatly party city! Toronto I find more "business" minded and expensive as hell.

      Toronto is always in a rush, but Montreal, if someone isn't doing 120-130 Km/h in a 70-90 zone, run them off the road or find yourself ran off the road by the guy behind you.

      Just my $0.02 - if you're not bilingual (French/English) good luck getting work, it's certainly not easy in Quebec anymore.

    9. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      P.S.: Oh, yeah Candians are more polite. Last time I was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I wanted to get laid eventhough I was with my girlfriend.
      Perhaps you were in a titty bar with your girlfriend?
    10. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by Prune · · Score: 1

      So true! While I was attending USF in Tampa, I got hit by a car. Nothing broken or serious damage, but my bill for a mere three days in the hospital was $10K! I got hit right at the corner by the hospital, so the ambulance only had to go about a hundred meters, but the ambulance charge was still over $500...insane! Thank goodness my mother had insurance and I was a dependant.
      I'm sure glad to be back in the good country. UBC pays a small fraction of what US universities do to TAs and RAs, but I have no regrets for getting the hell out of Amerikha.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    11. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! If so many girls asked you to get laid, then you must've stayed on Ste-Catherine street quite a bit! ;-D

    12. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by techworm · · Score: 1
      If you live in Toronto and go to a pub is pretty easy to spot the American's over the border for the weekend because they tend towards rude, pushy and snotty.

      Those aren't Americans, they're Yankees. Or, as we call them here in the South, Damn Yankees. It's Canada's misfortune to border the North and, thus, to have to interact with so many Damn Yankees. It's my misfortune to have to share a country with them. (Actually, we offered to split it, but they preferred war.)

      Unfortunately, it seems that Yankees travel abroad more than the rest of the country, so the world thinks all Americans are like them (rude, obnoxious, arrogant, ignorant, etc.). When I travel, I invariably get called a 'Yank.' Of course, I object, but doing so is usually pointless, as:

      1. Most of the world is ignorant of American history, geography, culture, etc.
      2. Or they don't care to be disabused of their stereotypes, because hating America and Americans is so fun.

      I did however, after a number of years, get my Australian girlfriend to understand the difference:

      Recently she attended the St. Patrick's Day parade in Dublin. She and her friends arrived shortly before the parade was to begin, which meant they had to stand behind several rows of people who had arrived earlier. Then a family with young children arrived. The parents asked the people ahead of them if their children could move to the front. Everyone agreed except for a bunch on the front row. One of those women, in an American (New York) accent, exclaimed that she had arrived at 6 a.m. and that "no one is getting in front of me." The rest of my girlfriend's entourage (Brits, Irish, Australians, Spanish, etc.) cursed Americans, but she, correctly, cursed the 'Damn Yankees.'

      By the way, the workplace, not to mention office Christmas parties, used to be a lot more fun in America, but over-legislation by our politicians and over-suing by our lawyers killed it. From the corporate perspective, better to be boring than to risk lawsuits.

      One last anecdote:
      A few years ago, I went to Vancouver for a week and stayed at a H.I. (Hostelling International) hostel. Every night there were hostel sponsored events at local pubs. I had a lot of fun drinking and flirting with foreign young ladies. Next I went down to Seattle and stayed in another H.I. hostel there. I arrived in the evening and was in the mood to go out for a drink. So, not knowing anyone there, I figured my best bet would be to go on a hostel sponsored outing. I dropped by the front desk and asked if there were any pub-crawls, etc. planned for that night. The guy working at the desk said, "No, not tonight nor any other night. This is America; we would end up getting sued if we had anything like that."

      -R.L.
      "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."

      --
      You're an individual, just like everyone else.
    13. Re:Dude, You Have a Problem by $criptah · · Score: 1

      I am not a fucking troll. I have lived around the United States and I spent some time in Canada as well. You can chose to live in a trailor park, be a gangster, a teacher or a doctor. The United States is a big country and life there varies from place to place. Canada is the same.

      The point of my topic was that you do not have to move to Canada to find a better job; you may find one in the United States. Problems exist in every country, Canada is not an exceptoin.

  123. Awww, Come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You're just blaming Canada!

  124. In Other Words... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Aboot the same, eh?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  125. Sad News ... Anonymous Coward, dead at 12 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Anonymous Coward was found dead in his mother's basement this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his trolls, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  126. It all depends on you... by Ankh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I came to Canada 15 years ago (from the UK) as a computer consultant, loved it, and stayed here in Toronto ever since, except for a few months working in the Boston area of the US. And for what it's worth, I'm married to an American ex-attorney :-)

    An unpleasant job is unpleasant anywhere. I can't comment on the insurance industry, I don't know about it.

    When you're comparing countries, remember that Canada is geographically larger than the US, and has a lot of variation, as of course does the US. A factory worker assembling cars in suburban Detroit might be amazed that the houses in Ontario are not all the same shape :-) and someone from San Francisco might miss the hills. A visitor from the South gaped in awe at the mixed-race couples everywhere here in Toronto.

    The highest tax rate is indeed 51% but get an accountant: you'll find there are more deductibles that reduce your taxes here, and a rate of around 30% is more common, assuming you are earning more than Cad$60,000/year.

    Yes, you'll quite likely be paid less here. But the cost of living is lower. Make sure you get at least the same dollar amount and it shouldn't be too bad.

    The healthcare is in fact better than someone commented: my partner has had a lot of health problems, and for some things Canada is much better than the US, for some it's not. In some cases, the Canadian health programme will send you to the US for treatment and cover the cost too, although it's rare. You are much less likely to have doctors trying to sell you on expensive drugs or treatments here, and more likely to find doctors who want to help you.

    In much of Canada, at least in the more rural parts, there's much better public transport than you might be used to, depending on which part of the US you're from. It's a symptom of a greater emphasis on community, on the need for everyone to live together and get along, and to respect each other's differences, celebrating diversity. This comes at a cost of a lower emphasis on the individual, especially on the rights of the individual where they might adversely affect the community. Hate speech, for example, is a crime.

    It took my husband (yes, we are a gay couple, and yes, we have same-sex marriage here) about 18 months before he stopped saying "Canada is so far behind the US" and started to realise that in fact we're going in a different direction. After a few more years he came to appreciate that direction, and decided to immigrate. I've heard similar stories from others: it can take two or three years to get used to a different way of thinking and to stop judging what you see based on experiences gained in another country.

    Canada is far from perfect, but we don't have George Bush, and many of the Americans who move here are dissatisfied with the US in some way, and often relatively left-wing. But you should come and see for yourself.

    The Immigration Canada Web site is useful - http://www.cic.gc.ca/ - and will help you get a visa. You can get a NAFTA work permit I think, but you'll need a certified job offer to do that. if you decide to immigrate and then find a job, there's about a year's waiting list and a non-refundable fee.

    You could also start reading online papers such as the Glbe and Mail, and depending on where you are planning to go, daily papers like the Globe and Mail.

    Oh, and on climate - yes, it gets as cold as Minnisota in the winter at times :-) and today it's over 80 degrees with a dry warm breeze. It depends where you live; Toronto is pretty far south, further than most people realise, and we get weather not that much different from new York City. But you could live within the Arctic Circle if you really wanted to :-)

    I hope this helps.

    Oh, one more thing (I know this is already long).. I travel a lot... and always notice when I come home how different the people are in the service industry here. Go and get a meal at a food court in Det

    --
    Live barefoot!
    free engravings/woodcuts
    1. Re:It all depends on you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Canada is far from perfect, but we don't have George Bush, and many of the Americans who move here are dissatisfied with the US in some way, and often relatively left-wing. But you should come and see for yourself.

      Bastards! You're stealing away all the intelligent, non-holier-than-thou free thinkers from the U.S. Canada is the true threat to U.S. brand "democracy".

      I say that it's actually Canada that must have WMDs. We have to invade and instill proper morals and values (you must belittle anything you don't understand, you must never question a dimbulb leader, and you must support economy and society wrecking tax cuts)

    2. Re:It all depends on you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fags can marry in Canada? yeah, there went my want for moving there

    3. Re:It all depends on you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, sounds like you're closeted and in denial yourself! How many times have you gotten drunk and gone lookin' for trannies in your pickup? ;)

    4. Re:It all depends on you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and negroes can marry whites. That must really chap your ass hey Gomer?

    5. Re:It all depends on you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It took my husband (yes, we are a gay couple, and yes, we have same-sex marriage here)" ;^)

      Funny how you slowly revealed that.

      Nice summary. Good to have you here.

  127. KK vs. Tims by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 1

    you go to KK for donuts, so get some coffee while you're there. you go to TH for coffee and mebbe get a snack while you're there...I like donuts, but I *NEED* my coffee...and Tim's is the best...

    --
    When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:KK vs. Tims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim's is not great coffee, it's not bad, but it's no Starbucks, and it's no KK (yes, had their coffee, it was really good), and the worst thing about getting coffee from TH is you have to ASK them for an extra cup (because the idiots haven't figured out sleeves yet) so you don't burn your fingers carrying your drink. Bad coffee services. I don't want it.

    2. Re:KK vs. Tims by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 1

      never had to ask for extra cup...agree to disagree, I guess, but for Canadiana, you can't top the fact that TH is named for and started by a hockey player...

      --
      When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    3. Re:KK vs. Tims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Starbucks is some of the worse coffee I would take that as a real bad thing for Tim's. I personally prefer Green Mountain. Of course nothing beats Hawaiin Kona Coffee.

      If you don't think Starbucks is the worst coffee then just try it once without all of the added crap. Just drink it straight black. Once you get back from yacking then think about what they must be adding to make it not disgusting.

    4. Re:KK vs. Tims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I totally agree on the Canadiana front. I feel guilty going to Krispy Kreme for that very reason - I want to support the local guy (well, nationally local). And Tim's chili in a bread bowl is really good. But between their bad coffee service and par-baked donuts, they just aren't doing it for me anymore.

    5. Re:KK vs. Tims by j0rd · · Score: 1

      T-Hoes is owned by Wendy's now BTW.

      But i 3 wendy's.

      So Buying from T-Hoes is putting $$ into the US company anyways.

      can't go wrong with a big bagette/coffee/dougnut combo for 5$ though.

      --
      -- /me out
    6. Re:KK vs. Tims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I get is straight coffee - venti dark coffee of the day, whatever that turns out to be. I like strong coffee. :-)

  128. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Socialidiot, n.

    A person who calls a country with public health insurance but otherwise a free-market economy "socialist".

  129. I suppose I shouldn't feed the trolls ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 - If you're middle class, you are better off in Canada than in the States.

    2 - Studies of health outcomes find little difference between Canada and the States. When comparing heart attacks, I think you're a little better off in the States. When comparing infant mortality, you're better off in Canada.

    The remark about Uganda shows that you are a complete troll or are completely ignorant. I'm reporting you to the Senate Committee on Un-Canadian Activities.

  130. Northern Nirvana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will experience extreme employment bliss.

    You will be paid a generous living wage with numerous bonuses, tips and spiffs simply for maintaining par performance!

    You will have complete health, dental, disability, and mental insurance which will include such perks as liposuction, colored contact lenses and hair implants among others!

    You will enjoy 26 weeks of paid vacation!

    Paid transportation to and from work on clean, safe and efficient public transportation staffed with friendly, uniformed personnel!

    Luxury employee housing located minutes from publicly supported cultural attractions, enviromentally friendly parks and multi-cultutural diverse restaurants!

    A company cafeteria serving healthy vegatarian fare with continuous service throughout the day!

    A four hour work day and 3 day work week!

    Foot rubs! Foosball! Employee picnics and activities! Dating service!

    Get real! Work anywhere else is no different and no number of generalities, suppositions and stereotypes will change anything.

    It sounds like you need to change companies and your current location before deciding the grass is indeed greener on the other side.

    Cheers,

  131. Heard of WTO? by koan · · Score: 1

    Heard of WTO, NAFTA and all the other things that make life easy for corps?
    Well that will follow you up there so rather than move, stay and fight, you will get better results in life sticking to rather than running from.
    How you may ask? Create your own company and see if you can run it the way you think things should be and still make a profit

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  132. Life north of 49 by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

    lower wages

    colder weather

    better beer

    affordable healthcare

    fewer people

    better manners

    government just as frustrating as anywhere else

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  133. No, it is not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved here from Russia and had a choice between Canada, States, Germany, Ireland, South Africa (yeah yeah I know), Australia and New Zeland, which comprise the list of countries where I could move for under 10K of fees and 1-2 years of time. Canada had by far the most stream-lined immigration process (not that it was a decisive factor). Have a look here for details.

  134. a flash designer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you didn't kick his ass?? What's wrong with you? Besides what you're describing isn't that out of the ordinary for small US companies either.

  135. Infant Mortality: 6.75/k US - 4.88/k Canada by fuzzy12345 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the CIA World Factbook

    --

    Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
    1. Re:Infant Mortality: 6.75/k US - 4.88/k Canada by beakburke · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone keep whipping out that statistic as if it is meaningful?? What exactly does that tell us??

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    2. Re:Infant Mortality: 6.75/k US - 4.88/k Canada by pesky25 · · Score: 1

      Our rate is higher because we try to save more babies. In other countries, if the Doc. doesn't think the baby has a good enough chance, they don't try to save it. Still births and the like don't count in Infant mortality.
      In the US, we are far mor likly to try and save that child, which, unfortunaly, doesn't always work and increases the infant mortality rate.

      Lies, Damn lies, and Statistics

    3. Re:Infant Mortality: 6.75/k US - 4.88/k Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right....because we all know that in Canada, if your unborn child looks like it may not survive to term, we set the mother adrift on an ice flow to perish at sea, thereby keeping our stats low.

      The simple fact is, we have better access to health care for the portion of the population who are most at risk of losing a child.

      I applaud your very American approach mind you, if the numbers paint you in a bad light, just stop counting. Lots of WMD ...errr they aren't important. Lots of links to terror ...eeerrrr not important. He tortured thousands of his own people ..... errrr never mind, torture isn't that bad. He killed his own people by the thousands ......eeerrrr no, when we got to America, nobody else was living here, it was empty... We don't need no stinking UN ...eeeerrrr Hey could you guys in the blue hats take this shit sandwich off our hands.

      Bravo.

      PS, you are right, there is nothing good about Canada, and certainly no reason for Americans to come running up here to work....really...you wouldn't like it.

      OK, now that I got the flame stuff overwith, the biggest difference between the US and Canada for the average Joe.... not much, really. Politics are a little different on the news, but we all know that Joe Average doesn't mean a speck of fly shit to a politician. The taxes are a little different, better to be mega rich in the US, but if you make less that 120,000 per annum, not much changes (as others mentioned, Canada takes the lump at source, so you see it more clearly, the US taxes you at so many levels that you may never add it all up). Canadians may be a little friendlier, maybe a little more polite, but not significantly so, and I contend that assholes live on both sides of the border, neither group are saints. Canadians might welcome you a little more, in that we don't insist that you conform to our way of life, feel free to keep your cultures and customs. Of course, the US is also made up of 99.9% imigrants too. Canadians might seem a little less pushy, but we have aggressive people to. I think the true shock for many, is that we are a lot more similar than we are different. We are both proud people, who are very patriotic, we just show it differently. All of this negativity that has been thrown at Canadians in the past year or so, mostly reflects a difference of opinion. Canadians are proud to say "No, we don't agree.", and the US doesn't like it much. However, do not ever doubt, that in the event that there was a situation (political, natural disaster, medical, whatever) where you weren't sure who would be standing there helping out, it would be us. Not because we thought we had something to gain in a trade deal, or a new shipment of weapons, it would be simply because, we are more alike than either group cares to admit. Our politicians may sling shit at each other, you may not agree with what our parlement has to say about this issue, or that issue, we may not agree with some of your politicians moves in that country, or this policy, but the honest among us must realize, that people are no more defined by their politicians, than they are by their hair colour.

    4. Re:Infant Mortality: 6.75/k US - 4.88/k Canada by pesky25 · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong about my thoughts about Canada. I love Canada and have tried to convince my wife to move their. I love Canada, and I love America too. I am not saying what I said to bash Canada, and I think you health care system is great. But my statement stands, we have the most advance healthcare, it is macho, over the top, er on steriods, never let dealth win at any costs healtcare, that's just the way we are. It's not better or worse, jsut different, and the infant mortality rates reflect that.

      Not saying that the Canadians put kids that might not make it out to sea on ice flow. But in certain parts of the us, boston for example, we lead the world in resarch and advances in medicine. We have access to things the rest of the world doesn't yet. Expiermental, advance stuff, the latest and yes greatest.

      Most people never need that stuff, but infant mortality figures, (and unlike you, I've actually read them and asked the author questions,) reflect extrodinary measures unavailable to the rest of the world.

      When was the last time some loaded rich guy from Europe/Aisa went to Canada to see if the latest Cancer treatment would cure his rare form of Cancer? Never.

      So, you can bite me, and, besides you, I love Canada for it's culture, healtcare, beauty, and way of life and I know that Canada is not filled with numbnuts like you and the US is not filled with the arrogant, flag waving, condescendig dickhead you painted me to be.

      I like the tone of the rest of you post after the pps. Yous should have stuck to that.

  136. Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You mean canada isn't part of the US? I thought for sure they would have applied for statehood by now.

    1. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Silly, they're not part of the US; they're only our hat.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    2. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 states, 3 territories. That'd be good for at least 20 votes in the senate. Still want Canada to join?

    3. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because the NAFTA is used to dominate it, doesn't make it part of the US.

      (I would've said "shaft", but that would prolly get me modded down)

    4. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Talonius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Canada is our hat. Mexico is our pants. What the hell does that make Florida?

      More impotently, think about how limp and dysfunctional that makes the United States.

      (Impotently is a joke. I know how to spell importantly. ;p)

      --
      My reality check bounced.
    5. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Opie812 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Silly, they're not part of the US; they're only our hat.

      That's funny, because we think of you as our asshole.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    6. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just remember that we can live quite comfortably without a hat. Without us, you'd be even more full of shit.

    7. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      Canada is our hat. Mexico is our pants.

      I've heard of a Mexican hat, but not a Canadian hat. We must be one huge hat, being somewhat larger than the U.S. Makes you a little top heavy I would think, but hopefully let you keep a cool head, especially with those hot pants.

    8. Re:Our confused socialist friends to the north... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly, they're not part of Canada, they're only our ass.

  137. Are you a citizen? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or do you already have a job offer that will get you a visa? Canada, like the US, is NOT open access. Forigeners have to get permission to work there, even Americans. So before you cast in with both feet, make sure that you are actually going to be able to get work there. I'm not saying it's majorly difficult, but don't take it for granted. It IS a foriegn country.

  138. Re:Generalization? Re:Let me tell you how it diffe by subtillus · · Score: 1
    This guy must be kidding. Who in the right mind would make such a generalization?

    mike moore.

  139. Re:Socialist Country.... by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 1

    At least you don't have to be rich to get health care.

    I have to take issue with this claptrap. I pay $70/mo for a private PPO plan( much better than HMO )with Blue Cross. This is not bad at all. I am sick of people whining about the cost of health insurance and making ridiculous claims that you have to be "rick" to afford it. $70/mo isn't even enough to pay for a used Honda Civic.

    Try this:

    - Don't smoke.
    - Don't overeat to the point of weighing 300lbs.
    - Don't marry some bitch who expects you to impregnate her.

    If you are high-risk on account of YOUR OWN CHOICES, you deserve high rates.

  140. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by lubeboy · · Score: 1
    Canadian French is what French was like when they came to Canada, with very little change except for slang. Much like Canadian English is to British English, except that we've begun to sell out to Americanized English.

    FYI: I've spent 5 years studying the evolution of the Canadian dialects of English and French.

    It's odd the English and French show so much hostility based on Language, when the French are largley responsible for the evolution of the language to what it is today.

    Quebec French is substantially different in pronunciation and vocabulary, though easily mutually comprehensible, with the French of the Acad&#233;mie fran&#231;aise. This is due to the long history of French in Canada and the fact that French immigrants to Canada kept speaking the French of the Ancien R&#233;gime while in France the French revolution led to the standardization of bourgeois Parisian French.
    So, there you have it... the French language was re-created in France after the revolution.
    More:
    English French
  141. There's no problem with "outsourcing" by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2, Funny

    You just have to beware of "ootsourcing."

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  142. Speaking as a canadian living in Montreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We earn less, generally work less (more emphasis on family life), have universal healthcare that is not bad if used correctly and we also pay less for most of life necessities.

    Electric bills are the lowest in the americas if not the world (in Quebec anyway, dunno 'bout the other provinces).

    Rent is cheap: a two bedroom apartment in Montreal can be rented anywhere between 450 (dump) and 1000 (nice in a nice neighbourhood) canadian per month.

    Culturally speaking, Montreal is great. Great good, great intertainment. You can even learn to speak french, if you're so enclined...

    All in all, a pretty good life

  143. So its your fault! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Informative

    The software systems that most of the large insurance companies use are crap. I won't mention the companies by name, so its possible that its not one that you worked for. But my friend had to navigate through five different programs to find the correct benifits for a customer and that ws the best place that he worked at. Its really shocking how some corperations will put up with truly crappy software. The productivity gains that could be made would far out way the cost.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  144. US v. Canada by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's aboot the same up there, but it's pretty cold, eh?

  145. Same as America by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    but with higher taxes. I hope you enjoy giving all of your money away...

  146. Some info on where you are headed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taken from www.languagefairness.org

    Inequities between Quebec and the R.O.C

    1. According to Census Canada, only 4 % of Canada's population outside the province of Quebec are Francophones.

    2. According to the Official Languages Commissioner, the Federal government spends on average $500 million a year on Official Bilingualism; this does not include unforecasted expenses. The cost of official bilingualism is $4 billion per year.(a figure the accuracy of which our federal government has never challenged).

    3. Author Scott Reid estimates that since its inception in 1969 Official Bilingualism has added $49 billion to our national debt and a permanent loss to Canadian consumers of $40 billion worth of consumption.

    4. The cost of classifying military personnel by language - $50 million annually

    5. Translation costs for technical documents for patrol frigate project- $45 million, for tribal class refitting- $26.7 million, for 27 other current projects over $100 million.

    6. Cost of the 42 members of the official languages branch doing paperwork at National Defence Headquarters, $1.5 million annually.

    7. The cost of Moncton's two-day Francophone Summit - $35 million

    8. In the 1999-2000 fiscal year the federal government handed out $62,591,832 in French minority language grants outside the province of Quebec, only $3,341,000 was given in English minority language grants inside the province of Quebec even though there are more English speaking Canadians in Quebec than there are French Canadians outside of Quebec.

    9. The Commissioner of Official Languages' department has a staff of 109; 79 (72.4%) are Francophones and 30 (27.5%) are Anglophones. This department is in place to ensure the rights of minority languages. Figures quoted are from 1998.

    10. Every province in Canada participates in the reciprocal Medicare program except Quebec. If you visit Quebec this means that your provincial Medicare card is valid for hospital costs only, not doctors' services, for this you must pay cash and get reimbursed by your home province. When Quebec patients come to Ontario hospitals, they only pay $450/day for a bed. It costs the General Hospital $823/day (i.e. Ontario taxpayers subsidize Quebec patients to the tune of $373/day when they come to Ontario hospitals).

    11. The federal government controls immigration into every province except Quebec, they have their own Ministry of Immigration.

    12. An already cash strapped Canadian Olympic Association was ordered to train Olympic athletes bilingually or lose funding. This came as a result of a Quebec athlete training in Calgary who was unable to receive service in French upon entering the training centre. Former Olympian and present track and field coach Dianne Jones-Konihowski said "this would mean that we would lose even more athletes to England and Australia because funding would be taken from them and used to bilingualize training centres and hire staff".

    13. Of the $6.8 million the federal government spent on Canada Day festivities in 2000, $5 million was given to Quebec; contrast this with Ontario, which received $553,900.

    14. At the party's two day national council in Laval in April 2000, the Parti Quebecois unanimously voted to remove all Canadian flags from public buildings under provincial control, these include schools, hospitals and city halls.

    15. Since 1968 we have had 10 federal elections, in 9 of them we have elected Quebec Francophone or Francophile prime ministers for a total of 31 out of the last 32 years.

    16. In 1969 Pierre Trudeau declared Canada officially bilingual and in the process transferred 32,000 public service jobs from Ottawa to Hull, Quebec from 1970 to 1982.

    17. Canada is the only nation in the world that does not have its national history museum located in its capital city. In 1989 the Federal government under Brian Mulroney relocated the National Museum of Canadian history from Ottawa to Hull, Quebec. The name was changed to

  147. I don't see a difference... by Dan9999 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...corporately(you know how money mongering is money mongering anywhere). For the rest, it depends where you are in Canada.

    East of Ontario, people are extremely sociable and close. Southern Ontario is exactly like the Eastern US(not much more to say there), and West of Ontario, are there people there?(kidding)

    For the places that I've lived in the West, it's hate or love, if it's not one or the other then you really don't exist in their eyes except if you cross the street, cars will stop alarmingly even if they're not even close to you.

    But hey, honestly what you see in a place is what you make of it. Cool people will find cool people and the challenged will find the a*holes.

    One thing that is pretty nice about everywhere is that the new generations have almost no bias towards different people, they've learned to dislike people for their individual qualities and not as a group... that's cool in my book.

    bla

  148. For new Immigrants Canada is a tax haven for 5 yrs by so+sue+mee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Whenever I mention to Canadians that I bring people to Canada as a tax haven, they shake their heads in disbelief. After all, Canada has a well deserved reputation for having some of the highest marginal tax rates amongst the OECD countries. What most Canadians do not realize is that Canada has a well established regime of tax sheltering to attract new residents that it does not offer to its indigenous population. With proper pre-immigration tax planning, wealthy individuals can move to Canada and avoid income and capital gain tax on their non-Canadian source income and capital gain producing assets. In addition, since Canada. Does not have an estate tax, it is often considered as a favorable domicile of choice. Furthermore, while Canada does not have an instant citizenship program it does allow those who have been permanent residents for three years to acquire a Canadian passport. Being one of the most treasured travel documents in the world, the Canadian passport provides visa-free travel to most countries and allows the holder to take advantage of the North American Free Trade Agreement to live and work in the United States. Finally, as a result of the recent decline in the Canadian dollar, residents can enjoy an excellent lifestyle with all of the infrastructure of living in the United States at almost two thirds of the cost. In looking at Canada as a possible destination, there are two main considerations; qualifying for permanent residence and tax planning. I will look at each in turn. ABILITY TO QUALIFY FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE There are several paths leading to Permanent Residence in Canada. Aside from the comments that follow relating to Entrepreneur Category applicants, the rights, privileges, and obligations of the status received are the same, no matter which category the application is made under. However, the out-of-pocket expense, level of financial disclosure, and speed of application processing varies greatly amongst the categories. Family Sponsorship Category Certain Canadian citizens and Permanent Residents are entitled to "sponsor" certain foreign relatives for Permanent Residence in Canada. Relatives that can be sponsored under the Family category include: fiancées/spouses, parents, grandparents, all unmarried children up to the age of 19, certain unmarried children over the age of 19, and grandchildren (note that grandchildren can only be sponsored if they are orphaned and the grandparents have custody of the children in question). To qualify as a sponsor it is necessary to be over the age of 18, to be resident in Canada, and to have proof of income sufficient to look after all of those being sponsored. Independent/Assisted Relative Category Individuals who fall into this category base their applications on personal skills and ability to contribute to the Canadian economy. Applications are made according to a point system. The system is designed so that a twenty-eight year old applicant with five years experience in computer software design and with employment already arranged would be assigned more points than a fifty-five year old factory laborer with no employment arranged. If the applicant has a close relative who is a Permanent Resident of Canada or a Canadian Citizen he would be considered an Assisted Relative and would receive bonus points. The Assisted Relative category includes brothers/sisters, uncles/aunts, and nephews/nieces. Self-Employed Category Self-Employed applicants are those who have the ability to establish or purchase a business in Canada that will create employment for themselves and will make a significant contribution to the economic, cultural or artistic life of Canada. There are two types of Self-Employed applicants. First are those who, on the basis of their managerial skills, proven business experience, and financial status, intend to provide employment opportunities for themselves. The second type of Self-Employed applicants are those persons who are likely to be successful in Canada in a particular cultural field as artists, singers, writers, musicians, a

  149. I went the other way by thomasdelbert · · Score: 2, Informative


    I am a Canadian that after working a few years in Canada (Edmonton), I headed south. I liked what I was doing better in Canada, but the pay was bad. I think the market for programmers in Edmonton is flooded because there is a terrific (and large) university there but the industry in the town is mainly blue-collar.

    More than half of what you make will got to taxes, but your benefits will cost significantly less, especially if you have dependents as health care is a public service. Also, as long as you stay out of Toronto and Vancouver, the cost of living is quite low. I rented a small two b/r appartment in downtown edmonton for $500 CAD (about $330 USD at the time) -- utilities included. That would be worth at least $600 USD in Rochester, MN.

    Keep in mind that Canada is also regionally divided. Working in Toronto is a lot different from working in Edmonton, which is a lot different from working in Calgary. Choose the atmosphere you want to work in and select the appropriate city.

    Edmonton: Laid back, mainly blue collar town, city driving is easy, cold and dry winters, cheap housing, low salary.

    Calgary: not sure about atmosphere, mainly white collar town, driving not too bad but you will have to take public transportation if you work downtown, odd winter weather with snowstorms often followed by hot dry "chinook" winds, little more spendy on housing, decent salary

    Vancouver: People don't go there for the money, they go for the lifestyle. Considered one of the top cities to live in in the world. Expensive housing, low salary, mild winters, good night life

    Toronto: Stuck up coroporate culture, unions rule, evenin the white collar world. Expensive housing, frequent traffic jams, hot smoggy summers, great night life, streets are alive at all times.

    Saskatoon: Conservative population, not sure about corporate culture, long cold dry winters, safe city, very low cost of living, not sure about salaries, considered a boring city, good place to raise children.

    That's all the cities I can really speak about.

    All in all, if you have children, I encourage you to move to Canada, there are good schools, it's quite safe, and the public services make raising a family a lot easier.

    I'll be in the USA for a few more years, but I plan to head back eventually too. I am quite anxious about the $500B deficit that the US has because Canada used to have the problem and it took a lot of sacrfice to balance the budget and pay off that debt.

    God save the queen,

    - Thomas;

    --
    ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
    1. Re:I went the other way by jwsmith00 · · Score: 1
      I'll be in the USA for a few more years, but I plan to head back eventually too. I am quite anxious about the $500B deficit that the US has because Canada used to have the problem and it took a lot of sacrfice to balance the budget and pay off that debt.



      Pay off the debt?!?! I think you mean to pay off the deficit. The debt is the biggest its ever been at about $600 billion (CDN). While the budget is balanced (we think), our debt is being paid off very slowly. The Pearson/Trudeau/Mulroney years were the years of the monstorous deficits and even Chretien ran some pretty high deficits (guess where they took the money out of to balance the budget?)

      So don't come back to Canada with the expectation that we don't have problems. Further, the USA is a country 10x the size of Canada and they could pay off that debt very quickly compared to Canada. It will take Canada about a hundred years to pay off the federal debt.

  150. Re:Don't Get Sick by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    "-1 Troll?"

    FYI, moderators, it's not a troll if it's demonstrably true. Disagree? Then point out the differences (which should be easy, right?) but don't simply mark as "troll" anything which you wish were not true. That's cowardly and intellectually dishonest. As if that matters to most liberals.

    See. Now THAT'S a troll... Hook 'em and reel 'em in!

  151. Then stay out of 'corporate' America by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Try going into the 'small business' America. Its MUCH different then the big coproprates.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Then stay out of 'corporate' America by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the petty tyrant you directly work for is the CEO, not a middle manager.

      ;) (I'm speaking of my last job, which sucked acres and acres of ass.)

    2. Re:Then stay out of 'corporate' America by autophile · · Score: 1
      Its MUCH different then the big coproprates.

      Prates made of shit?

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
  152. Re:Don't Get Sick by rikkards · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say "anti-gun" more like we really don't need them to protect us with (except for those evil deer) :)

  153. Re:Socialist Country.... by thegrommit · · Score: 1

    Socialist Country

    Yes you're a troll, but Canada is a parliamentary democracy.

    As for taxes, Canada's progressive tax system makes it a good place start a business

  154. You don't mean... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    Dudley Doright do you?

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  155. Canada: Overclockers heaven by mozumder · · Score: 2, Funny

    They wouldn't have to buy 50 case fans when all they would need to do is stick their computers outside...

    1. Re:Canada: Overclockers heaven by ckedge · · Score: 1

      Do *not* laugh.

      My friend puts his case with the side off on his window sill, tapes the curtain around it all, and leaves the window open in the depths of winter. -20 C ambient case temperature (uhh, that's -4 F).

  156. Great thinking! by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    "I've ... decided to move to Canada. How does Canadian corporate life compare to that of the US?"

    Nice... decide first, research later.

    Lucky thing he didn't say: "I'm sick of the state of abuses by police in America. I've decided to move to China. What is it like there??"

    Lol.

  157. The Truth by Dan9999 · · Score: 1
    our beer is always cold

    the women always want to be warmed up

    we spend our time sitting around fires listening to the wise ones of the village telling many many stories of 2 girls living with a guy who has to pretend he's gay because the landlord doesn't approve of such nonsense. If it weren't for the stories, we'd like have to make up stories like this, heck maybe even make pictures to go with them to make them seem more true.

    bla

  158. ask Michael Moore by yagu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You might ask Michael Moore, the guy who is religous about "America", you know, the one who exposed the large corporations that were shipping jobs out of the United States to foreign countries?

    Our local news station recently did a piece on him -- apparently he has hired out the work to create and support his web site to a small firm in Canada. So, he should know about the advantages of taking jobs to a different country...

  159. Re:Don't Get Sick by mdfst13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Elsewhere someone posted that the figure was 7 million guns for 10 million households in Canada. According to this, there are as many guns in the US as *adults* (presumably there is more than one adult in most households). Even if the Canadian number should be 14 million guns (as suggested here), this is still less than the number of adults (22 million according to this).

    I would cite parallel statistics but didn't find them in my brief Google.
  160. eh! by supe · · Score: 2, Funny

    If your going to live there you need to speak the language. I'll rephrase from your post.. "I've been working as a sysadmin for an insurance company in the US for the past six years, and have decided to move to Canada, eh"

  161. If people ask you where you are from by thomasdelbert · · Score: 1


    If you go, I'll give you a tip:

    If people ask where you are from, don't say "American", say the name of your hometown like, "Brainard, Minnesota"

    Canada,being a small country that is culturally dominated by the USA is very anxious about their identity and Canadians frequently hold resent towards Americans because of it. If you reply by saying the name of your hometown, you will diffuse some of that by making you sound a little more personable and less arrogant.

    - Thomas;

    --
    ___ This sig is in boldface to emphasize its importance!
  162. Re:Don't Get Sick by Zebbers · · Score: 1

    what about HANDGUNS

  163. The US hardly has a monopoly by McSpew · · Score: 1

    I've not worked outside the US, personally, but I have a hard time believing the US has a monopoly on evil, soulless corporations. Disney, Enron, et. al. are great examples, but there's no way they're the only ones. I'm sure people who work for Philips, Matsushita, Hyundai, etc. will report similar stories to those you hear from people toiling at GE, Exxon/Mobil or GM.

    Besides, soon we'll all be working for soulless, globe-spanning megacorporations, living in company-owned housing, taking the company monorail to work, shopping at the company stores, rooting for the company sports teams and voting for company-endorsed political candidates.

    That said, I actually like the company I work for. It's a privately-held company, which may have something to do with its generally employee-friendly ways. Publicly-held companies generally are enslaved by the Wall Street Analysts and large institutional investors.

    1. Re:The US hardly has a monopoly by phurley · · Score: 1

      I also work for a small privately owned company and love it. We have our issues, but the owner/boss is a good person who treats his employees like people. Go figure :-)

      --
      Home Automation & Linux -- now I know I'm a geek
    2. Re:The US hardly has a monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You don't understand. The US has been exporting it's evil all over the globe for years now. It's impossible to escape the US manufactured evil anymore. Unfortunately for those hapless souls that imported US brand evil, it has a 100% infection rate. We're all doomed.

    3. Re:The US hardly has a monopoly by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was curious about these privately held companies. According to Forbes, the top ten largest (in terms of annual revenue) U.S. based privately held companies in 2003 were:
      1. Cargill
      2. Koch Industries Inc.
      3. Mars
      4. Publix Super Markets
      5. PricewaterhouseCoopers
      6. Ernst & Young
      7. Bechtel
      8. C&S Wholesale Grocers
      9. Meijer
      10. HE Butt Grocery

      (I think 3. should read Mars Defense Force.)
      So, do you work for any of these? Does anyone know if these companies are better ("nicer") employers than are public corporations? What about privately held companies in other countries?

    4. Re:The US hardly has a monopoly by kylemonger · · Score: 1

      Mars is the candy company, maker of Snickers bars, M&M's and other treats.

  164. Canada is 3 years behind US by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    I've heard it said that we're about 3 years behind the US in terms of mentality, fashion and industry norms.

    So far it's been a pretty fair gauge so remember what you liked about your job 3 years ago, stay here and deteriorate all over again!

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Canada is 3 years behind US by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      I've heard it said that we're about 3 years behind the US in terms of mentality, fashion and industry norms.

      You probably heard that from someone in the US (or live in rural Canada). The people I've run into from Toronto or Vancouver are on par with the 1st world - but aligned more on European lines (example - more agressive use of text messaging on mobiles) than the US.

    2. Re:Canada is 3 years behind US by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      Nah I was talking from a business trend POV.

      And are you REALLY telling me that the tech we sell to the US catches on here just as fast? Don't think so. At best it's a year or two late to fad.

      Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  165. Where in Canada eh? by beatleadam · · Score: 1


    In the two different occasions that I have worked in Canada, I have had nothing but good experiences with the companies and the Country.

    I however want to point out to the original poster of this "Ask Slashdot" that Canada is a Giant Country! The differences from working in Toronto, Ontario which is very much like a clean New York to Vancouver, B.C. (mmmm...Vancouver) which is like nothing imaginable and quite possibly the most incredible city in all of North America are incredible.

    The corporate atmosphere was very different as well in my observations in that Toronto was somewhat uptight East Coast (think New York) and Vancouver was very mellow West Coast (think Seattle or San Francisco).

    --
    I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  166. 2 Weeks Vacation is the Minimum by shking · · Score: 1

    For corporate jobs, two weeks paid vacation is the absolute minimum you'll get in most parts Canada (i.e. the legal minimum for someone fresh out of school). As an experienced person, you may be able to negotiate more (3 weeks? 4?). Not as nice as Europe or Oz, but still an improvement...

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  167. Everything's good but.... by PavelP · · Score: 1

    There's only one problem with work in Canada... is that there's no jobs here. Found one - feel lucky.

  168. Immigrating to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My husband is an American, is a tech, and we're currently in the immigration process. It's a very long process, and can be a pain in the butt. One would think with the world's largest "unprotected border" one can pick up and move to Canada. Not so. Check out www.cic.gc.ca and poke around there abit. Maybe take the quick online test about whether or not Canada would be the place for you...if you can get in as a skilled worker, you're good to go. Otherwise...good luck.

  169. Get used to good looking, skinny women by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Obesity plagues something like 40% of America... Per that statistic alone, we've probably got more hot chicks per capita than america does :)

    Less buffets though... Wonder if there's a correlation :)

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  170. No Americans Need Apply by jgunchy · · Score: 1

    Based on past experience, you are going to have a hard time. In order to get a work permit in Canada you are going to have to show that you posess skills that are not available in Canada. And then, your work permint is only good for several years. You will be expected to train Canadian workers in your skills and then go back home. Good luck, and don't expect to take your guns with you.

  171. Re:Just to clarify... socialism doesn't work. by LoFat+ByLine · · Score: 1

    Gosh, if only I'd known before how bad things were up here, I could have sent my father down your way for his recent surgery.

    Of course, it would have cost him his life's savings, but I'm sure it would have been worth it. Instead he had to contend with our Canadian health care system, which in his case meant receiving the services of a top-notch surgeon and recovering in an ultramodern facility with excellent care. Despite all that, I'm pleased to report he's doing great now. I guess he was lucky.

    And hey thanks, it's sure nice to know where I can go for cheap MRIs. I'll bet you all down there get that done once or twice a year, just for fun?

  172. mountain biking by maryjanecapri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i'd move up to canada just for the mountain biking!!!!!! we have some great places here in the US but you have to travel 1500 miles to get to them.

    --
    nature loves variety::society hates it get your variety at http://www.monkeypantz.net
  173. This is a troll by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately Canadian beer sucks.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  174. I AM CANADIAN by jwsmith00 · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to believe that corporate life in Canada is any different from that of the US. Maybe you could please explain and we could confirm or clarify some of your thoughts about the Great White North.

  175. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived & worked in BC for 4 years in the 1970's and would return in a heartbeat. Yes the healthcare system is imperfect, but look at the healthcare industry and insurance industries here. It is good if you are rich, badly flawed if you are not. Last I heard they actually let the people decide their elections there, not the courts.

  176. Not always 15% tax by Zutroi_Zatatakowsky · · Score: 2, Informative

    Allow me to clear things about taxes:

    Federal Tax: 7%, on *everything*.

    Provincial Taxes: 7.5% in Quebec, 8% in Ontario. Maybe also in other provinces, I don't know. And this 7.5-8% tax is only on "commodities", stuff not really necessary to stay alive.

    Harmonized tax: some maritime (eastern, like New Brunswick) provinces have an "harmonized" tax of 15% on *everything*. But maybe not on food, someone could explain more about it.

    Books are taxed only 7%, same for food. Magazines and CDs get the prov. tax, though. But, as I work in publishing, I love the idea that books are free from provincial tax.

    --
    All Hail Discordia. Hail Eris. Fnord.
    1. Re:Not always 15% tax by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      You do not pay GST (the 7%) on groceries. Restaurant food, snacks, etc. yes, but not groceries. There are other things you won't get taxes on as well, so it's wrong to say *everything*.

  177. beavers with handguns by genericacct · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those are here in Oregon. Anyone can get a concealed-carry license!

  178. Re:How does Canadian corporate life compare by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Eh, take off hoser. Lets get a free beer, eh.

  179. Climate Variability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To avoid lulling Americans into a false sense of security regarding the Canadian climate - the parent here is considered spoiled-by-the-climate-in-TO by pretty much the rest of Canada aside from south-western Ontario. As an example of what you might end up with if you are uncareful with your city selection, I submit the current weather situation in Winnipeg. We are currently just slightly above freezing (and the temperature is falling), and we can no longer see grass or sidewalk due to the heavy snowfall yesterday.
    But hey, the living's cheap.

    1. Re:Climate Variability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To avoid whipping Americans into a false terror regarding the Winnipeg climate, I remind you that the 8" of late April showers I swept off my car yesterday was the largest snowfall in history; the last major May snow was in '67.

  180. Xbox wages and other differences. by guidryp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Corporations will be the same. I work in Dilbertesque Telecom in Canada. Lots of execs lining their pockets, accounting scandals and office politics. Work will be the same if you work for the same type of organization. The only corporate difference, is you can expect less money in your pocket when all is said and done. On to those differences.

    Money:

    I definitely make less than my counter parts in the USA. Here is a fictional breakdown that is somewhat representative of buddies (many) who left for the USA.

    Location Me(Canada) Buddy (USA)
    Gross pay 60K CDN 75K US
    After Tax 40K CDN 56K US

    Xbox price $200+15% 149+4%
    Total XBs: 174 361

    There you go. At the end of the day after tax you get paid more than double the amount of Xboxes to work in the USA.

    Now onto some other differences:

    Health care:
    It has drastically declined in Canada. Anyone I know who has left in recent years feels they are much better served in the USA. You will wait 6months to get an MRI here. If you work for a company with decent benefits your care will be better in the USA.

    Guns:
    On a per capita basis, I remember hearing ownership is similar, but here it is more hunting rifles and less handguns. There is much less gun violence here, but it is constantly increasing espcially in Toronto.

    Religion and Politics:
    Unlike in the USA they hardly mix. Religion is much more low key in Canada. It is is a more socialist and secular society. Our most right wing political party is probably to the left of the Democrats in the USA.

    That is my observation as a Canadian in hi-tech. Come here if you want a change to a more liberal and secular society. But you will have less money and your job will suck just as much.

    1. Re:Xbox wages and other differences. by Xeger · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in what you've said about health care. How responsive is the Canadian health care system to the liberal application of discretionary income?

      That is to say, if I elect to spend some of my 174 XBoxes in exchange for quicker, more elaborate or more experimental health care measures, is it easy for me to do? Or does the socialized health care form a kind of bottleneck through which everyone must pass regardless of his economic status?

      If the former, then I'd be willing to take a cut in basic health services in exchange for this secular, socialist society. I'm young, in good health and rarely require medical services anyway. All I care about is getting access to the health services I need, at a similar cost to what I would pay here in the US, if I'm ever in dire straits.

      I'm aware that rampant liberalism brings its own problems, and I don't expect that Canada is a utopia. But I honestly believe that one does far less harm by leaning too far toward the left (interference with free markets, inefficiency) than by leaning too far toward the right (bigotry, greed, intolerance).

    2. Re:Xbox wages and other differences. by guidryp · · Score: 1

      Generally not responsive at all.

      You can pay a couple of Xbox's and go to an MRI clinic But that is one of the sole exceptions. Some of our political parties make noise about this as they don't consider it the Canadian way to be able to pay for better health care. There is always talk about shutting these down.

      If you have money and want fast health care you do what wealthy Canadians do. Go to the USA.

  181. No Rep. BS needed, your health care system sucks. by Shivetya · · Score: 0, Troll

    If Canada's damn healthcare worked so well then a family friend would not have had to come here TWICE to get operations. The first saved his life, heart surgery, which was "delayed" in BC. The second was for knee surgery, since it wasn't life threatening, was also "delayed"... If he had not had the knee surgery the damage could have been irrepairable.

    No person in the US is without availability to healthcare. Emergency rooms treat all who come. The US still has the finest hospitals in world and will remain so until someone manages to foist governmnet health care upon everyone.

    Seems to me, based on numerous sites and the Economist, federal health care in major countries isn't all its cracked up to be. In Britian if you pay you get better accomodations.. go figure.

    PS: I don't see how Republicans are a problem to your National Health Care's standing... You have a chip on your shoulder and apparently its far better for you to act emotional then provide facts.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  182. Speaking of words... by Atario · · Score: 1

    ...get used to hearing them differently.

    Most of us Americans know (we do, don't we?) that Canadians pronounce been the same way we pronounce bean, and about to (almost) rhyme with our boot (likewise for other similar words like house). Also, the "...eh?" thing. You will, however, run into other, lesser-known pronunciation oddities. For instance, process (which you will hear a lot in an office setting, particularly an IT one) will have the same first syllable as proton.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Speaking of words... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      So you mean, they don't always pronounce things in a particularly American way. That way of pronouncing process is, in fact, the standard way, used by people in Canada, Britain/Ireland, Australia and New Zealand.

    2. Re:Speaking of words... by Atario · · Score: 1
      Really? Let's vote. Country Population ____ Australia 19,731,984 New Zealand 3,951,307 Canada 32,207,113 United Kingdom 60,094,648 Ireland 3,924,140 Total "pro": 119,909,192 ____ United States 290,342,554 Total "prah": 290,342,554 ____

      We win. So nyah nyah on you.

      (Source data: Wikipedia)





      (This part is to feed the lameness filter...This part is to feed the lameness filter...This part is to feed the lameness filter...Stupid lack of HTML tables in comments...This part is to feed the lameness filter...Stupid lack of HTML tables in comments...Stupid lack of HTML tables in comments...Stupid lack of HTML tables in comments...)
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    3. Re:Speaking of words... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty bold claim to make, given that there is no such "standard" way. There are more different UK accents than different US accents. The people on the BBC news rebroadcasts I see over here don't say "aboot".

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:Speaking of words... by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      It's apparently true that vowels are pronnounced slightly differently. Although Canadians don't actually say "aboot", it gets misheard that way to American ears.

      There was an interesting show called "Talking Canadian" that talked about some of these things. It's on Newsworld May 26th.

  183. Did ok I guess, but won't go back. by xeno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This may or may not be useful for you, but I worked for ~three years for a mid-sized Canadian corporation with offices located in the US.

    The honeymoon: After getting dot-bombed twice, I was brought in for an interview via a personal referral, and it seemed like a good fit. I told them I was a little jittery about the technology economy, and to describe how they were doing. The response was something along the lines of "We've been making a small but dependable profit every year for the past thirty-plus years." I started work the next week. While primarily Canadian-run, the inclusion of British and Australians in the management mix gave a bit more of a truly international feel to the organization. The place was eerily quiet and very businesslike, which was a welcome change from the Brownian-motion style US/.com management of the previous few years.

    The serious relationship: They kept me busy on a number of good technology projects, but the risk-averse environment began to grate on me. The Canadian management was interested in the *idea* of new clients, but was so entrenched in the repeat-business-by-reputation model that they consistently failed to track new opportunities. Even really good and profitable ventures with low risk that landed in their laps tended to be neglected. For example, I spent quite a bit of effort on a business plan for expansion of an existing line of work, only to have it neglected rather than rejected outright. Still, there were interesting work opportunities, and we plodded along with them. I resisted slowing my personal pace of business and technical exploration, but eventually reached something of a tolerable balance.

    The divorce: The US operation began to lose money, and a new manager was brought in to build business. Instead, the uber-conservative atmosphere stymied new ventures at a higher level than had affected me directly. Low/med risk down here in the US was perceived as high-risk north of the border. The new manager (a low-wattage guy who was long on vision and short on follow-thru) then just resorted to layoffs. Now, a decent US-ian approach might have been to face up to the numbers, lay off a bunch of people with a semi-reasonable severance, and be done with it. Instead, in the Canadian corporate atmosphere I knew, having to do a layoff was a point of shame (which it should be, since any layoff is a tacit admission of management failure). But instead of getting it over with, they drew it out, firing an average of 1% a week for a year, on a seemingly random basis. The last straw for me was an ill-timed complaint that I made about not receiving my allotted training budget for the past two years. I was shooed out the door, only to be brought back as a consultant within a week. I finished my work shortly thereafter, and bowed out as gracefully as I could.

    Would I work for a Canadian company again? Maybe, but probably not. These few years seemed to combine all the worst features of risk-verse Canadians, tall-poppy-averse Australians, form-over-substance-obsessed British, and blinded-by-your-own-BS-management Americans. But it was tolerable, we made a little money, and the company is still in business and probably will be for some time to come. Based on my experience, I would say a medium-sized Canadian corporation might be nice place to park yourself if you want a quiet, staid environment for a few years. But be careful that you don't take root and slow down to a point that you can't re-enter the US or other fast-paced market in the future.

    Jon

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:Did ok I guess, but won't go back. by puppetman · · Score: 1

      You have one example, with which you generalize the entire country?

      I'm sure you can find those same companies in the mid-west US.

      The Blackberry is Canadian; is that not innovation and risk taking? Ballard made one of the first hydrogen fuel cells, and it's Canadian. Greenpeace was started in Canada. So was Electronic Arts. There are alot of more adventurous Canadian companies out there; the percentage might not be as high.

    2. Re:Did ok I guess, but won't go back. by xeno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The gentleman asked for a generalization, and I gave him one based on personal history. ("This may or may not be useful for you... Based on my experience..." etc). You cited four counterexamples. Between you, me, and the rest of the crowd, he oughtta get a reasonable sample.

      That said, I had exposure to a lot of other mid-sized Canadian corporate IT organizations (two major telcos, several banks, hospitals, a 1/2 dozen ministries, etc), and I perceived a level of commonality in the risk aversion of most of them. All's I can say is what I experienced. You might also note that I don't have a lot of positive things to say about US or British-style technology management as it was represented here. And while I experienced some negative aspects of Australian management styles in this particular Canadian context, if I were to make a broad generalization from my short experiences in Sydney it would be very, very positive.

      Your mileage may (and surely will) vary...

      Jon

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
  184. Octane? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    Just as a stupid car-guy question, whats the average high-Octane rating for US gas? I've found most of Canada's best juice is that pee-water stuff they call 91. Some places have 92, and a few might have 93. I know some places in Ontario (Sunoco stations) sell 94, but where I live thats not much more than a pipe dream.
    So how is it down south? I heard Cali got screwwed with the 91 stuff too, but doesn't the rest of the country have the luxury of slurping back 93 or 94? Or is that just a rumour?

    1. Re:Octane? by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      Everywhere I've been, there's 87, 89 and 93.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:Octane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get 94 octain in BC you just need to go to a chevron rather than a cheep assed gas station

    3. Re:Octane? by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

      You've never been to Utah or Montana. Back in Utah, the octane levers were: 85,87-89,91-93. Up here in the great state of Montana, our octane levels are similar to Utah's at: 85.5,87-89,91-93. Pretty crappy octane levels if you ask me.

      --

      YOU'RE WINNER !
      Another lame blog

    4. Re:Octane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It doesn't matter anyhow. It's all really a scam. You use the lowest octane recommended by your engine manufacturer - unless you mess with your compression ratios or mod your engine to run at much higher temps, higher octane does absolutely nothing in a car other than prevent engine knock by delaying combustion.

      There is actually more energy/volume in lower octane gas - octane just prevents early burning. If you already aren't getting early burning, you aren't in need of higher octane.

    5. Re:Octane? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly right. If you want to know if you're using to high of octane gasoline, smell your exhaust. If it smells kind of rotten egg-like, go lower.

    6. Re:Octane? by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Alabama has 93 at every station, and if you go to one near a race track they will have 110(no kid with a great car ever ever would convieve of putting this in their car for some illicit drag racing. Never. Absolutly not. Just doesn't happen :)

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    7. Re:Octane? by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Just as a stupid car-guy question, whats the average high-Octane rating for US gas?

      Psst ... I'm gonna let you in on a little secret the oil companies don't want you to know: octane doesn't matter a whit.

      You can put any grade of octane in your car between 89 and 93, and your car will perform the same. The 89 won't clog your plugs any faster or make you accelerate more quickly. It'll do nothing more than cost you extra cash.

      The different octanes are nothing more than an anacrhonistic holdover from the days before ECMs when "engine knock" was a real concern. All modern cars have ECMs which can adjust for any octane between 89 and 93.

      The only reason they still offer it in 3 grades is because the oil companies lover suckers like you who are willing to pay extra for something you think makes a difference. Notice how they never advertise that higher-octane is better - it's left as a "word-of-mouth" urban legend that they're happy to allow to persist.

      Save your money. Buy 89. Neither you nor your car will notice any difference at all, I guarantee it. Your bank account will, but your car won't.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    8. Re:Octane? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the oil companies don't have to do anything sneaky. Most customers are completely illiterate, so they'll pull up to a super premium pump with their 1992 Ford Tempo, and fill 'er right up at 1.02/L, rather than pulling the two feet forward to the .840/L regular.

      (Yes, I'm working a shit job to get through college. Got a problem with that?)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Octane? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Odd. My experience is that 93 octane gas gives about 10% better gas milage than 87 octane. Of course, it costs 20% more, so it's not worth the extra expense.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    10. Re:Octane? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Counterexample:

      '86 Camry. Recommended gas grade: 87 octane
      87 octane: 31 mpg
      93 octane: 33 mpg

      No change in driving patterns, automobile conditions, or average weather between the two tests.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    11. Re:Octane? by egeorge · · Score: 1

      I am in colorado and the average pump has 85-91, although higher can be had at boutique shops. However, here at our altitude, unless you have a turbocharger, you get zero benefit from anything higher than 85.

    12. Re:Octane? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Um, thanks for the tinfoil hat response... but i'm not your typical driver :). I'm more of a car enthusiast, so octane is a little more important to me and my car. Its the difference between 18 lbs of boost making huge power, or a huge repair bill ;).
      If its any comfort though, my parents only run on 89 :P

    13. Re:Octane? by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Not crappy. It's an elevation thing. In higher elevations you can get by with lower octane ratings. I know when I've driven thru MT, UT, WY, I've bought the 85 and never noticed any difference at all.

      Of course, that said a couple times when gas prices dipped I tried getting the 93 out here in CA to see if there was any difference. Performance was no better and my mileage stayed the same.

  185. But the ER can up and leave by schwaang · · Score: 1
    Just to note - US hospitals can't turn away any emergencies - no matter what their capacity to pay might be.

    No, but you can end up with a $30,000 bill for an appendectomy. No kidding.

    In my community in California the nearest emergency room is on the verge of closing, part of a larger trend. We're about to vote whether we want to pay a property tax to keep it open. It will cost about $104/year for small homeowners.

  186. i HATE this falsehood by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Other things to note: health care is essentially free.

    Bullshit.
    Unless your doctors and nurses work for free. And hospitals spring up out of the ground all on their own.

    Where do they get their money. From the government. Where does the government get its money? From you.

    Now...they may or may not do a better job with that money than a corporation (HMO or whatever), but they must get that money to pay the doctors from somewhere. And as the government makes nothing to sell, they get it via taxes. i.e., out of your pocket.
    Not having a separate line item on your paycheck stub for 'Medical' doesn't mean it is free. It just means you don't know exactly how much of your check goes towards it.

    oh yes, the beer is good. But so are many US micros...

    1. Re:i HATE this falsehood by puppetman · · Score: 1

      That's true. Take it farther, and admit that nothing is free. Even if the doctors and nurses worked for nothing, you would still owe them your gratitude.

      I meant free-compared-to-the-US. Maybe I should have said, your taxes pay for a good chunk of your health care services, rather than a post-income-tax expense. The tax rate is comparible between the two countries (and don't say parts of the US have lower tax rates - Alberta has no sales tax, and a flat provincial tax), and Canada has had a federal budget surplus for going on 10 years.

    2. Re:i HATE this falsehood by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I meant free-compared-to-the-US

      It's not even that. In CA, part of your paycheck goes to the govt coffers, to be distributed to the medical industry.
      Here, part of my paycheck goes to the healthcare insurance company, to be distributed to the medical industry.

      Pretty much the same thing. Just different fingers handling what used to be my money.

    3. Re:i HATE this falsehood by hsoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course healthcare is not free, but at least, the cost is shared among *all* canadians. This way, *any* canadian have access to the same service, not only the most fortunates citizens. My aunt lives in colorado, and had to mortgage her house to cure a quite nasty disease her son got, because the family healtcare insurance she had had no more money to pay ( I don't quite remember the details, but I think that it was the kind of insurance that stopped paying when there have been too much claims. My cousin should have been sick a couple of weeks earlier. ). You will never see that in canada ( You will see huuuuge waiting lists for certain types of surgeries though because the system is overloaded, but well... )

      --
      perception is reality
    4. Re:i HATE this falsehood by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, Canada doesn't waste as much of its tax dollars as the US. I can buy that!

      But the healthcare still isn't free...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    5. Re:i HATE this falsehood by code+addict · · Score: 1

      Of course you forgot one little piece... Insurance companies are corporations and are driven by profit, shareholders, etc. That means that a good chunk of that money you paid to the insurance company DOESN'T go to the medical industry but to the companies shareholders.

      That's the KEY benefit to the Canadian healthcare system: It's not for profit.

    6. Re:i HATE this falsehood by beakburke · · Score: 1

      Anyone that thinks that non-profits magically are cheeper than for-profit establishments needs to undergo a quick examination of the brain, followed by some data input.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    7. Re:i HATE this falsehood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This myth is perpetuated by the idea that wealth is only found by "accident of fortune" (fortunate) when in fact a great many people work very hard to create wealth and in America, it's not illegal to benefit by producing something of interest to more people who are willing to pay for it.

      Naturally there are a lot of moral variances such that people of equal wealth are not of equal merit as individuals, but the bottom line is that the U.S. does not broadly censure people (by confiscation) according to how much money they acquire -- well to some degree but not as much as in Canada.

      Why is this important? For those few people who actually *do* want to do something extraordinary, and leverage their sweat equity and acquired intelligence into capital tools that they use to build an economy, it's morally repugnant to have a less competent government decide by fiat that they'll do a better job of spending those dollars than the person who acquired the dollars would in investing them privately and according to the intelligence they had to build to acquire the wealth in the first place.

      Providing for people who *are* truly less fortunate (e.g. born into modest circumstances with tremendous burdens inordinate to average opportunity) is also a moral imperative, but it doesn't mean that the government need be the instrument by which that is totally governed. The idea that government is a pure entity that will do a better job of managing the public's trust than would a public's choice of private institutions is an idea many people don't think is such a hot one.

      And every incompetent act of government that occurs tends to reinforce that foundation. If government were to start performing well in every other regard, we might have a different opinion. Unfortunately (more for your position than mine), they aren't!

  187. Canadian Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you get 20 Canadians out of a swimming pool?

    Hey you Canadians, get out of the pool.

    Canadians are nice. Really nice. I've only visited there, never worked there, but I'd have no hesitation about living there ... if only it wasn't so f**king cold.

    I have lived in several different countries and I currently live in New York. This winter that just finished about 3 weeks ago has been atrocious - frequent snow storms and bitterly cold winds. Now imagine a country where the warmest parts are hundreds of miles north of here. My friends in Montreal tell me they simply don't go outdoors from October to April.

    By all means give it a try - just so long as you feel you look good in 15 layers of clothing (no wait, this is Slashdot - no-one here cares what they look like...)

    1. Re:Canadian Joke by overloadhz · · Score: 1

      I have lived in several different countries and I currently live in New York.

      Yeah, I agree, New York is a separate country.

    2. Re:Canadian Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the West coast - say, Vancouver or Victoria. Costs an arm and a leg (well, probably cheap compared to NY) but the temperature varies between -5 and 25 (23 - 77) all year, with a bit of snow once or twice in the winter. Lotsa rain though.

  188. Re:Just to clarify... socialism doesn't work. by natmsincome.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to compare it that way then you can do the same against other countries eg:

    The british pound is worth more than the US dollar so getting a wage in pounds is worth so much more ... bla, bla, bla.

    If the end WHO CARES? There are only two times most people care about the exchange rate:
    1. When you buy something from another country.
    2. When you go overseas.

    You could also talk about how the Japanese get paid alot more than most people but that doesn't take into considertion the cost of living and lifestyle. Don't understand?

    Mac Hall explains this one quite well:
    Servay Says

    Basically if you get paid less but can buy more and have a better lifestyle then who cares?

  189. He's in the wrong industry by Scott+Richter · · Score: 1
    If you are unhappy with corporate life in the US, get out of corporate life, not the US. Insurance is one of those industries dominated very large companies. Lots of rules, regulations and PHB. Go find a (stable, profitable, non-high tech) company with 80 - 200 employees. It is a whole 'nother world working for a small to midsized company.

    No kidding. Judging all American businesses based on the insurance industry is like judging the whole human race after hanging around a bunch of cannibals. Or lawyers, same thing.

  190. We made a TV show about it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No kidding, our tax money payed for a comedy show about Jebb Fink, "An American in Canada". I think it's one of the most honest opinions about Canada you can find and its hilarious, especially because it's from an outside perspective. It might be kind of hard to find, I don't think its got the same popularity as the Trailer Park Boys I'm a developer and sys-admin for a small company in Red Deer, Alberta.

    1. Re:We made a TV show about it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funnier than the RED GREEN SHOW? Some PBS stations here in the USA air this Canadian TV show. I'd move to Canada just to become a member of Possum Lodge. ;-)

  191. Canada: The Maple Leaf State! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadians. North Dakotans with a health plan.

  192. As an American in Canada... by coolerthanmilk · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an American* working in Canada, I'll tell you that in my experience yes, it is more open and relaxed than in the US. That is until your company becomes noticed as an aquisition target because it's so successful and a US company sucks it up to help keep them alive. Having been through the experience, the contrast in company cultures was tremendous and the resulting atmosphere in the company continues to be depressing and as filled with corporate politics and frustrations as one could imagine.

    My advice: if you find a good job in Canada with the atmosphere you seek, enjoy it while it lasts. I did. And since then I've moved on to a smaller Canadian company where I enjoy the relaxed culture still, sadly I just don't get paid as well for it.

    As an aside, for an excellent resource on Canadian culture in general compared to the US, see Emily Way's An American's Guide to Canada. There is much useful info there.

    *Disclaimer: For those who are anal about such things, yes, I generally refer to myself as an American, prefectly aware that there are many other countries upon the American continent. But having lived in three other countries apart from the US, I have found that by refering to yourself as a US citizen, estadounidense, or whatever else often tends to confuse people. Really, it does. Once they realize what you're saying, they invariably reply "oh, you're American". So after years of trying to buck the trend, I've given in to the pressure from residents of other countries, including Canada and Mexico, the two countries with the most right to be offended by such a moniker, and call myself an American.

    1. Re:As an American in Canada... by badman99 · · Score: 0

      I'm sick of hearing people complain about the money they make. I spent 5 years of my life in UNI getting a double degree Engineering Electronics/I.T (Hon). I have 6 years of solid experience and make $35k AUS thats $24,500US or 33,888CAN a year with only CPI rises. SO after tax I'm expected to live and pay my $85k Hecs debt on $25AUS a year. I hate Australia

    2. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your disclaimer: you seem to know the difference and why calling a US citizen an american is offending. I must say that in Argentina if you call yourself an 'americano' people will take the true meaning of the word and not what you'd expect. It is also true that they would call you 'yaqui' o 'gringo', which is not great, either. Anyway, my .02 cents.

    3. Re:As an American in Canada... by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

      We Americans call ourselves Americans because America is the name of our country. Consider how the name of our country fits into the following pattern:

      Peoples Republic OF China
      United Kingdom OF Great Britain
      Democratic Republic OF the Congo
      Commonwealth OF Australia
      United States OF America

      I suppose the confusion arises because it shares its name with two continents that contain other countries as well. In conclusion, America needs a new name dammit! Given the amount of corporate influence and corruption, I vote we call it "The United States of Enronia".

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    4. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > *Disclaimer: So after years of trying to buck the > trend, I've given in to the pressure from
      > residents of other countries, including Canada and
      > Mexico, the two countries with the most right to
      > be offended by such a moniker, and call myself an
      > American.

      Bloody Americans. You forgot all about South America!!! ;-)

    5. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just returned from South America and always said I was from the US when asked. However, everyone else refered to me as an American. Every German, French, British, Ecudorian and Peruvian called it America and its citizens American.

    6. Re:As an American in Canada... by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of hearing people complain about the money they make.

      Then give them more money. Saying "You have no right to complain" almost never stops people from complaining.

      The fact that you make less than they do doesn't improve their quality of life. Focus your energies on improving your situation, not on criticizing people who want to improve theirs.


    7. Re:As an American in Canada... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      United Kingdom OF Great Britain...

      ...And Northern Ireland. I've never heard the English, Scotish or Welsh refer to themselves as "Greatbritanniansandnorthernirelanders". :-)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    8. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Ecuador and Peru are really different from the rest of South America in that case!

      In most other South American countries (including the one I came from), America is the Continent, not a country, and the movies and TV programs made in the USA and translated or subtitled in Florida, Mexico, Venezuela and Argentina always change the terms "America" and "American" to "Estados Unidos" and "estadounidense" (the lowercase is not derogatory, in Spanish the languages and nationalities are not capitalized). Sometimes they use "norteamericano", but that's not a good solution.

      I think that people may have been afraid to insult you by calling you "gringo" and they though that you would not understand the
      term "estadounidense".

    9. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is also true that they would call you 'yaqui' o 'gringo', which is not great, either.

      I guess you meant 'yanqui'.

      On the other hand, people from the USA should take into account that nowadays people don't even know the origins of the words "yanqui" or (specially) "gringo". Now they are almost NEVER used in an insulting way, so please don't get offended if you are called a gringo!
    10. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you forgot about Central America... because the idea of clumping Central and South America as a single continent is completely absurd.

      (Yes, I know that's what they told you at school, but let's face it, the World Geography that they taught you wasn't very good, even your teachers were quite ignorant, weren't they?)

    11. Re:As an American in Canada... by Smurf · · Score: 1
      I suppose the confusion arises because it shares its name with two continents that contain other countries as well. In conclusion, America needs a new name dammit!
      I know that you were trying to be funny, but if I had mod points I would mod you as insightful.

      Yes, the problem is that when the country got it's name, the people who chose the name made a very poor choice: they didn't realize that a few decades later the rest of the continent(s) would also gain independence and form separate countries that would not be part of the Union.

      So the country should better be renamed. But renaming the most powerful country, (and also a very stable one), is impossible.

      Your suggestion was kind of cool, though! (Yeah, I'm kidding. Please don't get me deported for being "unAmerican".)

    12. Re:As an American in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've given in to the pressure from residents of other countries, including Canada and Mexico, the two countries with the most right to be offended by such a moniker, and call myself an American.
      Why do people of Central and South America have less rights to get offended by such a moniker than Canadians and Mexicans?
  193. Mayo by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    Do you like Mayo on your burger?

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  194. Trying to rewrite history by stevew · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "The U.S. was in great shape DUE to Clinton. Bush and his greed bastard henchmen fucked it all up."

    The Dot Com era occured under Clinton which led to the recession. The recession technically started at the very end of the Clinton administration.

    Clinton DID run away from the vast majority of challenges to the US abroad during his administration as written by the original poster. That taught the terrorists exactly the wrong lesson and emboldened them to strike again and again thinking that the US would turn and run.

    Now onto topic! I commute with a gentleman/ex-canadian every day who has been living in the US for about 8 years now. He ran away from the taxes, poor health care, and constant interference of the government to come to California. (I can't explain why he chose CA..) He is now a US citizen thinking that this is the best place to be. Most interesting, since his Dad was British he has joint Canadian, British, and now US citizenship. He can work anywhere in the EU, Canada, or here. Look where he chooses to stay???

    So why does the poor dude who started this whole topic think the grass is greener over our Northern border??? It's only green a few months a year! ;-)

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
    1. Re:Trying to rewrite history by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "The U.S. was in great shape DUE to Clinton. Bush and his greed bastard henchmen fucked it all up."

      The Dot Com era occured under Clinton which led to the recession. The recession technically started at the very end of the Clinton administration.


      The second clip is just as bogus as the first. Clinton didn't influence the advent of HTML and the resulting, massive speculation on the stock market. It's ludicrous to blame a president for that.

      If anything, the massive corporate deregulation instituted by Reagan, which allowed the formation of mega-conglomerates, made massive speculation possible and highly lucrative. CEOs could no longer resist the temptation to bend the truth; they would lose money and possibly market share.

      So blame Reagan and all the easily fooled people who voted for a Hollywood actor with wonderful, soundbite answers to complex issues. Yes, deregulation made some people, especially the dodgy ones, lots of money for a while. Great, right? Yeah, tell that to the ex-Enron employees now.

      Some of us have and will always believe that government regulation keeps people honest and thinking about more than next quarter's share price.

      I will invest in corporations who have independent audits of their accounting practices, stock analysis from people who have nothing to gain or lose by a certain outcome, and impartial board members. That is to say, I don't invest in the stock market; I don't trust most corporations any more. Anyone who invests in today's deregulated corporate world of liars and spin doctors is a moron.

    2. Re:Trying to rewrite history by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      He ran away from the taxes, poor health care, and constant interference of the government to come to California.

      OMG, if he thought California was an improvement on those things, Canada must be truly screwed.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:Trying to rewrite history by corbettw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The second clip is just as bogus as the first. Clinton didn't influence the advent of HTML and the resulting, massive speculation on the stock market. It's ludicrous to blame a president for that.

      Hmm, you sound convincing. Perhaps one shouldn't blame (or credit) a president for flukes in the economy (even if you don't understand what caused the dot-com bubble...hint: it wasn't HTML).

      blame Reagan and all the easily fooled people who voted for a Hollywood actor with wonderful, soundbite answers to complex issues.

      Wow, hope you didn't injure yourself spinning around that quickly.

      The truth of the matter is that Enron and their ilk ignored laws already on the books. New laws would change nothing. Instead, enforcement of existing laws is the real answer, and the lack of enforcement during the Clinton administration was the cause of not just the accounting debacles at Enron and company, but also the dot-com bubble (which were really two sides of the same coin). For more information, see here.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:Trying to rewrite history by tarranp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ACtually, the rise of the megacorps is due to the insane way we tax investments in the U.S.

      Read Milton Friedman's analysis for the details, but essentially since investors are taxed more heavily for investing in companies that pay dividends than for investing in companies that plow their profits into expansion, naturally the investors invest in companies that keep reinvesting their income in favor of growth. This is why Enron and MCI were so popular, they kept growin dramatically by acquiring companies left and right.

      The best way to end this troubling trend is to dramatically reduce the taxation of dividends like was done by Bush the younger ( I didn't vote for him, don't like his policies much, but occasionally he does something sensible).

      Of course most people who oppose the dominance of huge corporations seem to oppose the very steps required to gently bring about the end to their dominance...

    5. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clinton DID run away from the vast majority of challenges to the US abroad during his administration as written by the original poster. That taught the terrorists exactly the wrong lesson and emboldened them to strike again and again thinking that the US would turn and run.

      you are the one rewriting history. the clinto admin tried to kill bin laden. they missed but at least they tried. what did reagan do after 200+ marines were killed in beruit barracks bombing? nothing. what did bush I do after lockerbie? nothing. what did bush II do about the cole bombing? nothing.

      the people responsible for the first attack on the WTC were caught, tried and convicted. The LAX millenium bombing was stopped.
      get your face out of pill poppin' limbaugh's bloated arse.

    6. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Instead, enforcement of existing laws is the real answer, and the lack of enforcement during the Clinton administration was the cause of not just the accounting debacles at Enron and company, but also the dot-com bubble (which were really two sides of the same coin)."

      Hope your link shows that both the house and the senate repeatedly hampered and hamstringed the IRS and SEC budgets and repeatedly went witch hunting in comittee on the former showing all the "abuses" that enforcement wrought for "normal Americans."

      Oh I just checked and it does not. Instead it suggests letting the companies tell us what they want when they have enough of us ask them. The market will decide. Sorry but most of the world would say that the US market is crap under those terms. Hell it is bad even under stricter terms (GAP) so why should the market alone make it better than the current market plus government oversight?

      Your link also claims that the poor American companies are comitting fraud because of high taxes.

      "Companies could not hire investment advisers to recommend against overloading on one asset because of a flawed legal system that would hold the companies liable for the investment advice."

      Ha ha ha. So companies should be allowed to look out for the little guy so he diversifies his stock portfolio but government should not tell him like every other (potential) investor that his stock is a POS.

      OK I'm done. Your link is a digital turd. Maybe someone else will pick it apart better than I feel like doing right now.

    7. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He ran away from the taxes, poor health care, and constant interference of the government to come to California.

      Funny, I did the opposite for the same reasons!

      First the cost of living ... Ouch! I cut my salary in half (from L.A.) but have a lot more money left in my pocket at the end of the month (yes, in US currency).

      The higher taxes are compensated ten folds by all the services! The health insurance alone is well worth it. In California health insurance costs doubled TWICE (X4) in the last 6 years! And still going up every quarter. No such payments here! With 2 young kids and often self-employed the CA system was killing me (pun intended). Did you know that major medical work (like dental work) is permitted only if you are 3 or sometimes 5 years with the same health insurance contract? My new employer never agreed to pay ME the health insurance so I could keep my self-employed contract the next few years in case I move on in a few years (you know, a single job for life thingy)! I have to get on their HMO crap for the next 3 years, and then when I move on I must restart from scratch somewhere else.

      But there is only one thing to say about working in Canada! PAID OVERTIME 1.5X regular rate over 45 hours! This is by law if you are an employee! I was giving away 1 or 2 months of "free work" a year in California as expected by the boss (no problem, I love to work hard, it's one of the things I love with start ups). Oh my boss was really appreciative! Until review time, pay increase time, extra vacation time, ... or when they ran out of money. Then you realize you are just another brain in the farm!

      Best move I did in my 12 years career.

    8. Re:Trying to rewrite history by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't buy that. We've had the rise of the megacorps for a lot of reasons, of which dividend taxation is an inconsequential part.

      • CEOs usually don't have to take responsibility for screw-ups beyond losing their jobs. This lowers the bar for deciding to buy another company.
      • Companies have the rights of individuals. This means:
        1. During tough economic times, weaker parties can't survive on their own, but hold IP that their competitors don't want to go to someone else.
        2. Companies can sue each other into oblivion, resulting in #1.
      • Companies have little real incentive to pay dividends, thus most don't, instead churning money back into themselves.
      • By its very nature, capitalism tends to lead to either oligopoly or monopoly (though they usually eventually collapse) because in a sufficiently large group of competing forces, one or a few of them will always come up with some significant cost-cutting or quality-enhancing measure that puts them way ahead of their competition, resulting in an artificial imbalance that tends towards consolidation (or bankruptcy, if the stronger companies have nothing to gain from buying the weaker ones).

        While government can be one of the forces that creates the artificial imbalance, that imbalance is more often related to cost of entry into some aspect of the market.

        Take, for example:

        1. IBM
        2. Ma Bell
        3. Microsoft
        4. TV, Radio, Motion Picture, and Music industries
        5. Microprocessors (just a handful of major players)
        A business could be one tiny company out of a thousand or a much larger company out of five. Guess which one most businesspeople would rather run?
      If anything, reducing the taxation of dividends will make things worse. Figure that most people don't pay much attention to the issue and just let their tax preparer handle those issues. The ones who pay attention to taxation of dividends are the uber-rich---the ones investing large sums of money. Thus, this will result in the richest few percent of the population having significantly more money that they can play on the stock market.

      Now, tell me... do you think they'll spend their money on a company that isn't trying to grow or a company whose goal is to become the single dominant player in a market? Don't you think that CEOs of companies will thus continue to try to buy other companies (particularly since many of these are the same people)?

      No, the rise of the megacorps was inevitable. It's a product of a broken system whereby corporations have too many rights and are too unregulated. As long as consolidation is rewarded through -significantly- lower bills, more value for investors, and much higher overall profit, no amount of reduction in dividend taxation is going to make a significant dent in the situation.

      The way to solve this is to avoid rewarding companies for merging. Make it economically undesirable for a company to make too much money without ploughing it into charitable causes or distributing it as dividends, in much the same way that people making huge amounts of money pay a larger percentage of the tax burden. This -directly- attacks the trend towards overconsolidation, and is the -only- effective means for controlling this natural tendency of the corporate world.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Forgetting that a significant chunk of dividend payments goes to average people who rely on it as a substantial portion of their income (particularly after retirement), and who frequently cannot afford to pay taxes on it.

      Last time I saw stats, said average people held somewhere around 75% of all investments.

      But I agree that taxation and dividends aren't near the causative factor that "see how big we made our bottom line!" is, which is best aided by policies of reinvesting and conglomerizing (if that's a word).

      And yes, it sucks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      This is just opinion but here it goes...

      Milton Friedman wants to cut taxes across the board (essentially reducing govt to what it would be under pure capitalism). I have no idea why he is attempting to use dividends vs capital gains to manipulate arguments.

      The tax on dividends vs capital gains is largely irrelevant for everyone (except wealthy investors who don't want capital gains*). The reason companies don't pay dividends has little to do with the tax rate. Instead, companies don't pay dividends because they don't have enough cash flow. Only large, established corporations have lots of cash coming in. Hence they are the ones that pay dividends. The rest don't have enough to pay pack.

      Furthermore, if what you are saying were true (which it isn't), companies would ALWAYS reinvest or buy back stock. That is, they will NEVER pay dividends. Yet, they DO pay dividends.

      To sum up, even if dividend taxes were cut, it will have little impact on corporations. Only a few more will start paying dividends now (instead of reinvesting or buying back stock). For the most part, the ratio of those that pay dividends vs those that don't will remain similar.

      (* This makes no sense either. From a financial point of view, capital gains, dividends, and stock buybacks are all the same. You can replicate dividends with an appreciating stock. For example, if you want 5% return, you can simply sell the right amount of your (appreciating) stock every year to get 5% cash.)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    11. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I think it's something like 50% of Americans invest in the stock market.

      But 30% control 70% of the stock market. Most Americans own very small amounts (less than $150,000).

      In fact, most Americans make more from their wages than from the stock market. Of course, it is the opposite for the 30% that own most of the wealth (for them, they make almost nothing out of their salaries/wages, while investments account for the majority of their income).

      I HIGHLY doubt that a "substantial" number of people rely on dividends for their retirement (or even when younger). I think a majority use debt (eg. bonds) instead. If you want something safe with constant returns (as retired people do), bonds are a better option. That's what I would do and I think that's what most people go for. That probably explains why the bond market is 10x the stock market.

      As far as taxes are concerned, unless you are wealthy, the taxes you pay on your income is no different than when you were younger. I mean, the tax you paid when you were working and making $40,000 would be similar to the tax you pay if you received $40,000 in income from retirement funds. Usually people have smaller income when retired so the tax rate and the tax amount is even lower (unless you are wealthy of course). In addition, you don't pay things like payroll taxes, unemployment insurance, and things like that.

      If you are a pure capitalist and want to eliminate taxes, just say it. Stop coming up with all sorts of bogus arguments...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    12. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Don't you only get overtime if you get wages as opposed to salaries?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    13. Re:Trying to rewrite history by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      In the UK you are taxed on dividend income when you receive it, and on Capital Gains from Investments when you sell them.

      Normal taxpayers now pay less tax on dividend income than on bank deposits.

      How does it work in the US?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It used to be the case that interest payments and dividends were taxed as ordinary income (28%-36% depending on your "bracket"). Capital gains were taxed at 20% on investments held over a year ("long term"), or as ordinary income if held less than a year (actually a year and a day).

      After the recent tax cut, all the rates were lowered, and dividends are now taxed at the same rate as long term capital gains.

    15. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Tiroth · · Score: 1
      From a financial point of view, capital gains, dividends, and stock buybacks are all the same. You can replicate dividends with an appreciating stock.

      How can this be true? If a company pays out a dividend of $1 per share, the investor can then reinvest that $1, earning between ~2-10% annually depending on how it is invested. In contrast, if the company simply holds it as cash, the share price in theory appreciates by $1. I, the investor, then sell enough of my holdings to gain $1/share in cash. My remaining shares continue to hold $1 of additional cash as part of their valuation.

      But wait, that money is /useless/ as cash. It isn't earning anything! Even if the company is investing it for some return, if they aren't beating the cost of capital, the investor would generally do better to have the dividend. And unless we are talking about a company whose business is investing (insurance, banks, etc), do you trust them to make wise investment decisions?

      Historically, companies with large amounts of excess cash have NOT invested it wisely. It tends to get spent on all sorts of whiz-bang ideas that in the end effectively destroy some of that shareholder value when indexed against relevant benchmarks. This is often a stealth "loss" because shareholder value increases, just not as much as it should.
    16. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple quick notes:

      Companies have little real incentive to pay dividends, thus most don't, instead churning money back into themselves.

      Right, that one was his argument.

      No, the rise of the megacorps was inevitable. It's a product of a broken system whereby corporations have too many rights and are too unregulated.

      I agree that it was inevitable, but the rest of your statement seems to presume that the very existence of megacorps is worse than a decrease in rights and an increase in regulation, a premise that I don't agree with. Especially since we've seen that with increased globalization, most corporations respond to regulation and taxation by moving more of their functions to less regulated countries. It's naive at best to tell corporations that they're the root of all evil, tax them, tell them what they can and can't do, then complain when they choose to take their business elsewhere.

      Lastly, I think you left out the significance of branding and lock-in. People don't buy McDonalds or Sony or Microsoft more often just because there happens to be more of it out there. They buy those products because they are familiar with the brands, or because it will work with all their other Sony and Microsoft stuff. I'm not saying this contradicts your other reasons, simply that it should be added to your list.

      Bottom line, I agree that corporations will tend to get larger, in that same laws-of-physics way that rocks tend to roll down hill. The only way to change that is repeated intervention - picking the rocks up and carrying them somewhere else, or picking individual companies and splitting them up by force of law. I personally think that intervention is a terrible idea.


    17. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USS Cole attack occured on 10-12-2000, during Clinton's watch. He had 3 months to repond and did nothing. Why? The fact that he'd be leaving office in a few months isn't a valid excuse. He was still President until Bush was sworn in, with all the responsibility that goes with that office. Passing the buck is poor leadership.

    18. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      If you are a pure capitalist and want to eliminate taxes, just say it. Stop coming up with all sorts of bogus arguments...

      Suggestion that a particular tax structure leads to problems is not the same as trying to eliminate all taxes. Please resist the urge to paint your opponent into a simplistic box so that you can ignore his statements. If his arguments are bogus, simply point out their flaws, don't try to attack him personally for making them in the first place.

      Taxes that are taken off one area are usually moved to another one (or matched with a cut in spending). Yes, this isn't always the case, as the last four years make apparent. But the overspending right now will have to be paid back eventually. That doesn't mean we shouldn't seek to change the tax structure for the better, seeking to encourage certain things and discourage others. Admittedly, dividend taxes, along with other factors, discourage companies from adopting a model of "become medium sized, continue to do good business and pay our profits out as dividends." On the other hand, I'm not sure if the alternative is better.


    19. Re:Trying to rewrite history by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      Have to disagree. Some non-dividend paying companies accrue cash at a fantastic rate. Microsoft and Google come to mind. The reason old-line companies pay dividends is that there is a large segment of the investing world that demands them; this segment is also interested in more stable investments, so companies that are larger and stable pay dividends to attract those investors (if you don't believe that companies target their stock to particular investor classes, ask a corporate IR person over a drink--spending time with buy-side analysts is a large piece of a Fortune 500 CFO's job.)

      As to the 'cut taxes across the board' argument: I believe cutting corporate taxes could raise the government's take. Individual tax rates are higher in general than corporate rates. By eliminating corporate-level taxes (and taxing dividends as ordinary income again and treating gains from stock buybacks as dividends), you accomplish several interesting things: you eliminate the disparate tax treatment of loans and equity which has caused so many companies to become overleveraged, you eliminate the corroding temptation to create corporate tax shelters, you create a huge incentive for companies to relocate (or re-relocate) to the US, and (I believe) you actually end up with more money in the pockets of lower-paid workers (because companies will have more money to pay salaries and our tax code is regressive.)

      If you look at the tax codes of countries where social justice is a higher priority than in the US like, say, Sweden, you'll find that the corporate tax rates are lower than in the US. That's because the Swedes tried to create a tax code that was good for the country, not one they could sell most easily to neo-populists.

      --
      Milo
    20. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I disagree on your interpretation of the linked article. I thought the article stated that the reason companies committed fraud had to do with 1) companies having incentives to decieve, 2) little enforcement of existing laws, and 3) politicians that have little knowledge of business. Now, admittedly, I just skimmed the article. But I think that's the same thing you did, given how you seem to have focused on only one or two paragraphs out of the article.

      And why so caustic? "Digital turd"? Is that really called for?

    21. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, if what you are saying were true (which it isn't), companies would ALWAYS reinvest or buy back stock. That is, they will NEVER pay dividends. Yet, they DO pay dividends.

      This is not only untrue, it's not what the parent was arguing. You're setting up strawmen.

      A finite penalty is a disincentive, not a prohibition. It will make people less likely to do something, not prevent them from doing it entirely.

      If you want to rebut arguments, employ a little intellectual discipline. If you just want to call your opponent stupid, then just call him stupid.


    22. Re:Trying to rewrite history by druxton · · Score: 1

      That taught the terrorists exactly the wrong lesson
      Didn't Clinton fire a few cruise missiles
      into Afghanistan trying to get Bin Laden and into Sudan for reprisal of the embassy bombing (may have been misguided, but not neglectful)? What exactly did the current president do before 9/11, even after warnings from the Clinton administration? Isn't that why you have a committee looking into the whole thing?

    23. Re:Trying to rewrite history by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The truth of the matter is that Enron and their ilk ignored laws already on the books. New laws would change nothing.

      Sure they would. The auditing firms engaged in ethically questionable practices that may or may not be legal. If the laws regarding the auditing firms had been different, then they would have been better positioned to discover and report the violations in the laws by Enron. Making it double-illegal to steal won't help. Making it illegal for auditing companies to look the other way would help.

    24. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Suggestion that a particular tax structure leads to problems is not the same as trying to eliminate all taxes. Please resist the urge to paint your opponent into a simplistic box so that you can ignore his statements. If his arguments are bogus, simply point out their flaws, don't try to attack him personally for making them in the first place.

      Ok.. I'm sorry. I didn't mean to be that rude. I have a habit of being harsh with capitalists but that was uncalled for in this argument. Accept my apologies (the original poster that is)...

      Taxes that are taken off one area are usually moved to another one (or matched with a cut in spending). Yes, this isn't always the case, as the last four years make apparent.

      I think I refuted the original poster's arguments (such as claiming that old people are disproportionately impacted, etc). The tax cahnges he is calling for will have largely little impact.

      Admittedly, dividend taxes, along with other factors, discourage companies from adopting a model of "become medium sized, continue to do good business and pay our profits out as dividends."

      This is where you--and him--are wrong...just my opinion of course. Under capitalism, a corporation will ALWAYS attempt to grow to a large one. There are a ton of reasons for this but here are some key ones:

      (i) Capitalism requires constant growth. The whole system is based on that. If a corporation (or for that matter a country, city, or whatever) doesn't grow, it will not survive. Why do capitalists use growth rates to determine recessions/boom/etc instead of unemployment rates or poverty levels or things like that? Well, it's because growth is all that matters. If YOUR company doesn't grow, I can guarantee you that no one will invest in it. Given two similar companies (one that pays dividend and doesn't grow vs another that grows but pays dividends), I'll guarantee you that the growing one will keep appreciating and becoming more powerful/wealthy.

      (ii) There are a whole hoarde of reasons why large corporations are preferable to small corporations FOR THE OWNER (for society, it's another story). Typical benefits include economies of scale (Sony), market clout (Walmart), monopolization/oligopolization of the industry (Microsoft, Oracle, IBM), greater influence on government/public, and so on. All these factors are FAR MORE important than the tax on dividends. For instance, economies of scale alone is good enough to become larger.

      So to sum up, I don't think the original poster is really calling for altering the tax structure (for instance, I don't think he is saying 'let's increase capital gains tax and lower dividend tax'). If he is representive of the people he quotes (Milton Friedman), I'm sure he is just calling for dismantling of the "socialist" government by elimininating most taxes (especially dividend taxes which benefit the wealthy more than anyone else).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    25. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      According to theory, the company will only hold cash if it can reinvest it in higher return projects. Yes, some of these projects may be a bust but that's because they are more risky (hence potential for higher return). In addition, it isn't as bad as you are saying. At a minimum, the company will earn interest on its cash. A company like Micrsoft, which has huge cash, is probably earning more in interest than small tech company's total earnings.

      Having said all this, companies CAN be as bad as you are implying. In such as case, you shouldn't be investing in them in the first place. In any case, that has nothing to do with the original arugment. After all, such companies will still keep the cash even if dividend taxes were lowered (I mean, if they are not acting in the interest of shareholders then what's to say they will when taxes are lowered?)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    26. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree. From my understanding of finance, companies pay out dividends if they can't reinvest in higher yield projects. That's the theory and I have never read anything to the contrary anywhere. I have never heard anyone say that companies target themselves to certain individuals.

      From what I understand, companies pay dividends when they can't reinvest. The reason large companies pay dividends is because they have money coming in, and have nothing else to do with their money. In contrast, small companies or certain sectors (like high-tech) do not pay dividends because they reinvest their money or don't have money coming in.

      I really don't buy your argument that companies try to target their customers. If you look at data, you'll find fairly consistent patterns. For instance, utilities and banks pay high dividends. Hi-tech and junior mining rarely ever pay dividends. Small and medium sized companies rarely ever pay dividends either. And so forth. If what you were saying were true, you would get anamolies on a regular basis, yet they rarely occur. For instance, you would find a small company paying large dividends or a utility not paying dividends (both of which don't occur).

      I don't buy your tax argument either (although I think we have different interests on this matter). A country like Sweden actually has higher TOTAL corporate taxes than USA. USA is one of the least taxed countries for corporations. Most left-leaning countries have higher taxes. If Sweden doesn't seem to have a higher rate, you are probably ignoring something (perhaps hidden employer taxes aren't being accounted for, or something).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    27. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      ok, I was too strong. I should have said, 'rarely' instead of 'never'. I agree with your thought. However, my point still stands (with the weaker wording). If dividend taxes were as bad as the original poster was making them out to be, very few companies would pay dividends. Yet many companies pay dividends.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    28. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      Why do capitalists use growth rates to determine recessions/boom/etc instead of unemployment rates or poverty levels or things like that?

      Because that's what does determine a recession or a boom. This isn't a "your philosophy rewards different criteria" kind of thing, it's a "trying to build houses with water instead of bricks doesn't work" kind of thing. Getting 100% employment or 0% poverty is so easy as to be trivial. All you do is calculate the minimum amount of work needed to feed, house, and clothe everyone, hire people to do that, and hire everyone else to move rocks back and forth all day. Then distribute the resources to everyone. Voila! 100% employment, 0% poverty, and a horrible society to live in!

      These numbers, like GDP, growth rates, inflation, they aren't just made up by people obsessed with green paper. Building a house has value, because people can live in it. If you have two people do the same job that one of them could have done alone, that second person's work doesn't have actual value, even if you give him a job and pay him as much as the first person.

      "Jobs" aren't a resource. "Jobs" don't house people, feed them, cure them of disease. If you do something of real value to someone, then they'll trade you something that is of real value to you for it. That's what a job should be. By all means, we should have more of those. But gains in efficiency which eliminate current jobs while increasing acutal productivity (again, not an imaginary word. productivity = houses, clothes, food, transportation, entertainment, medicine, ACTUAL USEFUL ACHIEVEMENTS) are a good thing. There will always be useful things to be done, even if everyone is fed and housed. More and more people in the world are fed and housed today than fifty years ago. That came from growth, not from employment percentages. If it takes me working all day to feed myself, then I make an improvement so that working all day feeds two people, that's GROWTH. That's what we're talking about when we talk about growth, increasing the actual stuff that's being achieved. Not some abstract sense of how fat the figure representing Walmart is in a political cartoon.

      But the other point that you're obscuring is that while growth is important for the economy at large, that doesn't mean large companies growing and eliminating smaller ones. If every company was matched by a new company of that size, without any existing companies growing, that would still be 100% growth of the economy.


    29. Re:Trying to rewrite history by tarranp · · Score: 1

      Warren Buffett refuses to invest in any company that pays a dividend. He is the most famous of a large number of serious investors who recognize the poorer return caused solely by the taxation of dividends.

      The problem is not so much the rise of a megacorp, but rather the rise of inefficcient megacorps. If I invest $1,000 in company A and it produces a dividend of $50.00, I can choose to invest my profits in another company or enterprise. However, if they reinvest the $50.00 by moving into a new market, then my investment is tied up in the same company.

      Large companies to enjoy economies of scale in certain industries that give them an advantage over smaller ones. On the other hand, Enron and MCI and, for that matter, GE all are or were conglomerations of widely disparate industries and bussinesses with little or no synergy.

      This essentially translates into two negatives, the investor in the large company gets a poorer return on his investment because it is harder for him to target his investments on the most efficient performers in a particular market.

      The larger companies tend to be less efficient at providing customers with what they, the customers, want.

      The sad thing is that many people who are bothered by the existence of poverty think that the problem is one of distribution, that we need to take money away from the rich and give it to the poor.

      Rather, the saner approach is to focus on wealth creation, growing the pie so to speak. As long as people are permitted to engage in entrepeunurial economic activity without onerous burdens of excessive regulation, things will work out well.

      A case I like to cite is the luxury tax that was passed in the early 1990's during the presidency of Bus hthe elder. The idea was that rich people buying yachts and othe rtoys would be better able to pay taxes, and no poor person would be harmed. The yacht manufacturing industy in the U.S> effectively ceased to exist within a few months. The rich were not too inconvenienced, but alot of carpenters and shipwrights foudn themselves looking for other work...

      Much of our tax code in the U.S. was designed from a perspective of social activism, to act as a wealth redistribution system. In the end, it does far more harm than good.

    30. Re:Trying to rewrite history by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      Well, welcome to the world of difference between theory and practice. Your statements are false on the face of them, if you put down the textbook and look around. (On the other hand, if you're a student, as it sounds like you are, you should know that there is no agreement among academics as to why corporations pay dividends. If your professor is giving you the efficient market line, then it is out of laziness. Efficient Market Theory is far from universally accepted. Here's a source whose author's name you should recognize: Black, Fischer, "The Dividend Puzzle," The Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter 1976, pp. 634-639.)

      1) If what you say is true, why has Microsoft been sitting on a huge pile of cash for years, earning far less than their equity cost of capital? Any valuation of Microsoft must take into account that they're part operating company, part bag of cash. The bag of cash piece has been dragging down their valuation metrics for years.

      2) If what you say is true, why would banks pay dividends? The business of banks is investing: in debt or in equity. If banks can't find better investments than their own cost of capital (prety low, as it is) then who can?

      3) If what you say is true, then why do so many public corporations have investor relations professionals, and why do the IR folk spend so much time meeting with buy-side analysts (those are the people who recommend investments to mutual funds and other institutional investors)?

      4) If what you say is true, why do so many corporations maintain their sacrosanct dividend policy in the face of changes in their underlying business? (According to your theory, dividends should be changing all the time as investment opportunities come and go inside a corporation. This does not happen--probably because the market interprets a change in dividend policy rather more catastrophically than it might warrant.)

      Once you're done reading your economics textbooks, I would pick up a book on poker (or iterated game theory, pick your poison.) Corporations spend a lot more time worrying about signalling than they do about wonderig whether they could deploy their dividend money more profitably elsewhere. The other piece you're missing is that corporations often manage risk in preference to maximizing profit. As any EM theorist will tell you, profit maximization would come from increasing risk as much as possible... why don't all companies do that? The reasons are obvious, of course, but are not reflected in the formulas. (The cost of risk depends on individual human nature... how much would you pay for a 50% chance at $1,000,000? The formulas say $500,000, but there are very few people in the world who would pay exactly that amount; most people would pay either less or more.)

      As to tax rates in Sweden, check your sources. All I know is that I have done business in both places and corporate income taxes in Sweden are lower. This does not include VAT (a consumption tax) or employee taxes (which are taxes on employees, not corporations) or asset taxes (which are taxes on investors.) The tax burden in Sweden is undeniably higher overall, but my point was to efficiency--how the taxes are levied.

      --
      Milo
    31. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Tiroth · · Score: 1
      According to theory, the company will only hold cash if it can reinvest it in higher return projects.

      Well, I was responding to your statement that the appreciated value of the company was equivilent to paying out a dividend. What if the statement above is not true, that is, the company does not have a higher return project in which to invest the cash? Then there is no equivilence.

      In such as case, you shouldn't be investing in them in the first place.

      Not necessarily. The entire point of dividends is that the company feels that there is more shareholder value in paying out the cash than investing it elsewhere. Bigger is not always better: there are may small-cap companies that are excellant investments, which nevertheless would have no ability to manage a huge amount of cash. There are a lot of people that think that Microsoft is letting their huge cash reserves go to waste.
    32. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Before I start, it seems that you are agreeing with some of what I say. Either that, or I don't understand your points well. To clarify, I am making two points (roughly the first point was made in the first post and the 2nd point in the latter post):

      i. dividend taxes have little impact on the dividends that are actually paid out
      ii. corporations that do not pay out dividends (but have positive cash flow) are reinvesting in higher yield projects

      1) If what you say is true, why has Microsoft been sitting on a huge pile of cash for years, earning far less than their equity cost of capital? Any valuation of Microsoft must take into account that they're part operating company, part bag of cash. The bag of cash piece has been dragging down their valuation metrics for years.

      Microsoft is sitting on cash due to potential future liabilities (mainly lawsuits). They will pay it out when the liabilities are settled. That's what they have been saying.

      2) If what you say is true, why would banks pay dividends? The business of banks is investing: in debt or in equity. If banks can't find better investments than their own cost of capital (prety low, as it is) then who can?

      Not sure what your point is here since you seem to be agreeing with me (I could be misunderstanding you though). According to what I am saying, banks CAN pay out dividends. They are doing that because they clearly aren't finding higher yield projects to undertake.

      I don't think what you are saying about banking is correct. Banks do not make money by investing. Rather, they make money by lending. This is why banks do well during low interest rate periods and poorly during high interest rate periods. Banks borrow at a low rate (from the government) and lend it at a higher rate (to individuals and corporations). That's a bit oversimplified but I hope you agree with me.

      If what is said above iss indeed the case, then I don't see your point about banks not giving out dividends. The reason they give back the money (via dividends) is because they clearly place a higher cost on that money than on the money they borrow from the goverment. The higher cost on generated cash flow is generally true for all companies. The money a company makes is not "free". Shareholders place a value on them. At a minimum, the money made by a corporation has a cost equal to the risk free interest rate. After all, if MY company makes money I can loan it out and get the risk free rate.

      Maybe I just don't understand your point. In particular, I'm not sure why you say, "If banks can't find better investments than their own cost of capital (prety low, as it is) then who can?" What is that supposed to mean? Are you saying banks are the best money making business in the world? Banks are not infinite profit making machines...

      3) If what you say is true, then why do so many public corporations have investor relations professionals, and why do the IR folk spend so much time meeting with buy-side analysts (those are the people who recommend investments to mutual funds and other institutional investors)?

      What does this have to do with anything? This is simply marketing and sales. They are clearly trying to influence the funds in order for them to purchase the companies. As far as why they spend time with the analysts/funds/etc rather than the small retail investor, it's because they have more money.

      4) If what you say is true, why do so many corporations maintain their sacrosanct dividend policy in the face of changes in their underlying business? (According to your theory, dividends should be changing all the time as investment opportunities come and go inside a corporation. This does not happen--probably because the market interprets a change in dividend policy rather more catastrophically than it might warrant.)

      You mention signalling later on and that's why dividends don't fluctuate all over the place. Having said that, pref

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    33. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Warren Buffett refuses to invest in any company that pays a dividend.

      What Warren Buffet does is kind of irrelevant. Pointing out one person, albeit one of hte top investors of all time, doesn't mean anything. For example, I can probably find one respected investor that says to hold gold, while I can find another that says equity is the way to go, while yet another says to go for bonds. Picking one person doesn't mean anything. In any case, read my next point.

      He is the most famous of a large number of serious investors who recognize the poorer return caused solely by the taxation of dividends.

      I am NOT saying that dividends are taxed at the same rate. They are not. You pay more taxes on dividend income. Anyone who fills out tax returns (and has looked at the investment section) would know that. I know it. You know it. Almost everyone knows it. My point, however, is that this has little impact except for the wealthy and large investors. Of course, you may have the wealthy investor in mind (which you seem to) and he/she clearly would prefer lower dividend tax (or for that matter lower of any tax).

      This essentially translates into two negatives, the investor in the large company gets a poorer return on his investment because it is harder for him to target his investments on the most efficient performers in a particular market.

      If a large company is not investing its cash flow wisely, what are YOU investing in it? I don't see this as a problem with the company; rather it's your problem. For instance, why not invest in another company that is perhaps oriented towards one industry, or is a medium sized corporation?

      The larger companies tend to be less efficient at providing customers with what they, the customers, want.

      I don't want to give the impression that I'm defending corporations (since I don't like them from a leftist perspective) however I don't agree with your point. The large corporations are actually more efficient than the smaller ones. That's why they win. Why do consumers purchase stuff from the larger ones? I mean, the reason the large ones dominate is simply because the consumers take their business there. If what you were saying (i.e. customers not satisfied) were correct, then very few would go to a large corporation.

      Rather, the saner approach is to focus on wealth creation, growing the pie so to speak. As long as people are permitted to engage in entrepeunurial economic activity without onerous burdens of excessive regulation, things will work out well.

      You are clearly a capitalist somewhere on the right wing, and I'm a leftist. I think our argument will simply devolve into the classical left vs right argument from now on. If you feel like reading, go ahead but I don't expect you to change your opinion on anything below here.

      It is my theory that free markets will lead to oligopolies and monopolies. What you call "onerous burdens of excessive regulation" is actually a good thing IMO. Things like anti-trust laws, FDA (federal drug administartion), etc all help society.

      A case I like to cite is the luxury tax that was passed in the early 1990's during the presidency of Bus hthe elder. The idea was that rich people buying yachts and othe rtoys would be better able to pay taxes, and no poor person would be harmed. The yacht manufacturing industy in the U.S> effectively ceased to exist within a few months. The rich were not too inconvenienced, but alot of carpenters and shipwrights foudn themselves looking for other work...

      I probably care about workers more than you but what you cite is perfectly ok with me. You know why? Well, it's because it is a luxury good. If the wealthy stop supporting something like that, I don't care. As the world becomes more egalitarian, luxury goods and all the jobs that depends on it will dissapear (at least that's my theory). There is a reason why we don't have anyone building palaces

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    34. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if we are disagreeing on anything.

      Well, I was responding to your statement that the appreciated value of the company was equivilent to paying out a dividend. What if the statement above is not true, that is, the company does not have a higher return project in which to invest the cash? Then there is no equivilence.

      If there is no higher return project to invest in, the company will pay it out as dividend. There are very few companies that hold large quantities of cash without a reason.

      The entire point of dividends is that the company feels that there is more shareholder value in paying out the cash than investing it elsewhere. Bigger is not always better: there are may small-cap companies that are excellant investments, which nevertheless would have no ability to manage a huge amount of cash.

      Not really sure what your point is... I agree with what you are saying. There ARE some small companies that don't reinvest. However, the vast majority of small companies do not pay dividends.

      There are a lot of people that think that Microsoft is letting their huge cash reserves go to waste.

      People can think whatever they want but what matters is that MS is holding onto the cash for future liabilities (from lawsuits). Do note that the consensus on whether MS should be NOT be holding cash is not unanimous. In any case, if someone thought MS was not giving out the cash properly, they shouldn't be investing in that company in the first place. This is especially true for small investors who have very little voting power. Small investors should always try to vote with their money rather than the vote*.

      (* The difference, in case it is not clear, is that the money you invest is more noticeable than the 0.000001% of the vote you have through the common stock.)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    35. Re:Trying to rewrite history by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Because that's [growth--ed] what does determine a recession or a boom.

      We are not going to agree on this since I'm not a capitalist. All I can say is that you are simply using it because that's what you have been taught. You won't agree with me but my opinion is that within a few hundread years, a better measure will replace growth. Social measures are far more important although capitalists don't care about it. To capitalists, a city with 10% crime rate is the same as another with 1% crime rate (assuming other factors are similar). I personally think that will not be the case in the future. A better example which I thing is a major flaw with capitalists is pollution. Capitalists don't consider pollution whereas I think it should be part of any measure.

      Furthermore, I think changes will start impacting how growth rates are used. For instance, things like "jobless recovery" essentially indicates a flaw. I also think that the development of poor countries (as well as other things like newer technologies) will cause deflation in rich countries. Looking at growth rates in a deflationary envrionment will be strange.

      All you do is calculate the minimum amount of work needed to feed, house, and clothe everyone, hire people to do that, and hire everyone else to move rocks back and forth all day. Then distribute the resources to everyone. Voila! 100% employment, 0% poverty, and a horrible society to live in!

      That is GREAT!!! I mean it! I, as well as a majority of the world's population I'm sure, will love it. There is a flaw in your proposed system though. Who is going to pay everyone? You can't create jobs out of thin air. Employment is inexoricably linked to the economy.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  195. No, that's what YOU call Canadian bacon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Is that what you call Canadian bacon?

    I was born and raised in Canada. The first time I ever heard of "Canadian bacon" was on a visit to California, when I was 17*. The next time was here at Slashdot (today) and I'm now more than twice that age, now.

    * It was also the first time I ever head of Moosehead beer, but I've had a few encounters with that one here since then.

  196. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by trotski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No person in the US is without availability to healthcare. Emergency rooms treat all who come. The US still has the finest hospitals in world and will remain so until someone manages to foist governmnet health care upon everyone.

    On the other hand, no one in Canada is serously in debt due to paying medical bills.

    As with everything, in healthcare you get what you pay for. Sure the system in Canada is in many ways inferior to the US, but it is absolutly free, or at least paid for by tax dollars. If you want to rely on the free medicare system in the US, your wait will be much longer and service much poorer than Canadians get.

    Good healthcare is a right, not a priveledge of the rich, and the Canadian system provides good heath care to all people, and not just the ones who can afford it.

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
  197. A tough choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Your question relates specifically to the Canadian corporate environment, so I will first answer that and then move on to other issues.

    I grew up in Alberta (Canada), worked a few years there, went to grad school in the US, and now live in the South. A decision to move to Canada has to be tempered by many factors relating to your personal situation.

    The first is that Canada is small. Most Canadians will be wildly offended by this, but it doesn't change the facts. The entire country has a smaller economy than California or Texas. This impacts the corporate culture in a number of ways.

    Firstly, to be a world-class corporation in Canada means focusing externally. The few world-beaters in Canada do most of their business outside of Canada--this gives them a much more international flavor. I work at an American company right now that is afraid to invest in Ontario because it's "foreign"; that attitude is much less prevalent in Corporate Canada. You move out, or you get taken over by an American firm.

    This leads to the issue of the branch-plant economy. Those companies that are not world-class (the majority, of course) are either internally focused (and survive because of superior local market knowledge) or are owned by American parents. A case in point is Tim Horton's donuts, which exemplifies both scenarios: a Canadian chain with deep market roots that is owned by Wendy's. This means that the hard-driving, ambitious professional managers (some call them seagulls...) are less prevalent in the branch plants. The real action is in New York, so why hang out in Winnipeg?

    To sum up: the Canadian corporate environment is characterized by less acrimony and politicking; places more of a premium on work-life balance; has lower (shockingly lower, in most cases) salaries; exports ambitious people to the "main plant" in the US; focuses on execution (as opposed to planning); and has highly educated people doing lower-level work (simply because the education level is quite high, but that may be my Alberta bias).

    There are also a number of cultural issues. Many Canadians define themselves in opposition to Americans (you may have noticed that on a few of these comments). This leads to sometimes good outcomes, such as the three weeks vacation that you'll start with, and sometimes leads to bizarre outcomes, like the pervasive sense of entitlement that people living high on your tax money will have. In general, however, the two countries are far more similar than they are different. The differences stand out just because so much of your daily routine will be the same.

    I support universal health care, by the way, but the Canadian system has so many holes that I'm concerned about my family's care in Canada. And, unlike any other good or service, you cannot spend your own hard-earned money to improve that, unless you fly down to the States for any emergencies.

    In general, Canada is better for families. If you live in Alberta, you will not face significantly higher taxes than in the US. Quality of life is better in Canada. You will make less money. You will be rewarded less for performance. You will find it harder to find work (that short-term Canadian manager's mind-set at work). If you start your own business, or lose your job, or have your business outsourced, your health care will be paid for and you won't worry about your family. And you won't have George W. as your leader.

  198. stfu moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, idiot, they get it from f-n taxes, but if you're a poor guy working hard and making 20-30 grand, you pay a small amount of it and still get good care. Rich shit "making"(idiotic american phrase btw) thousands of hundreds pays more. Everyone gets same good healthcare. Got a problem with that, scum??? Compare to the stinking US, where many people simply can't afford healthcare insurance(last I heard like 40 million), and more and more corporations dramatically increase copayments or drop healthcare entierly. Only rich shit can afford the huge amounts required for good healthcare, especialy dental, hospital care etc. Fuck that.

    1. Re:stfu moron by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Yuo seem to have two problems.
      1) a badly distorted view on American healthcare, and
      2) a serious linguistic impairment.

      Come back when you can make a valid point.

  199. Re: Improvement? by guidryp · · Score: 1

    You mean you can get less than 2 weeks annual vacation in the USA??

  200. Multicultural by overloadhz · · Score: 1

    Multiculturalism affects negotiation, business customs, social etiquette to a much larger degree than in the US. It's not necessarily a French/English issue either; in Vancouver you should expect to do business with many Far East Asian cultures and in Calgary with Indian/Paki/Bangladeshi. The primary distinction between the US and Canada in this regard is that there is no pervading "melting pot" concept in Canada. In the US, you might think of your heritage as--for example--"an American of Italian descent", in Canada you'd probably consider yourself "an Italian who happens to live in Canada". Deference to ethnic heritage is more ubiquitous.

    In my experience Canadians put much greater emphasis on personalizing business relationships than in the US, but of course that's an overgeneralization and depends largely upon the market segment and other factors.

    It's what you'd expect of a North American business climate influenced more heavily by European subcultures.

  201. Look no further ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash is the answer !!!!

    http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/end.php

  202. Why post political comments w/your company name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as you hate Republicans, any registered Republicans who might've or are dealing with you and read your comment will probably be reconsidering doing business with you. That's why in business it's best to leave politics and religion completely out of your corporate policy unless they're part of your primary business function.

    Either post the comments anonymously or without your personal identification, or eliminate the political bashing if you identify you and your company. As a CTO, it's your fiduciary responsibility to the stakeholders in the company and its employees to do it.

  203. Not true either by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    As of February 2004 (the most recent I could find), Mexico and Canada were tied then Saudi Arabia, by country. Looking over the current year it would seem to average out to be just about equal between Mexico and Canada (16%) with Saudi Arabia slightly behind in third place (15%). The point being that North American sources of oil provide 32% of the total oil imported, more than you'd realize. Here is my source.

  204. As a Canadian SysAdmin... by Linegod · · Score: 1

    ... I'd say it sucks. Sucks real bad. You don't want to come here. Ya, that's right, sucks. Stay in the US, and don't come poaching in Canada. Our beer is too strong and our women are too realistic about how a female and male body should look like and like to keep it that way. Oh, and the majority of people worry too much about the quality of life and not the quantity, mid-sized companies are far too lax about employees switching jobs between each other and we have far too many Federal and Provincial stat holidays. Ya, sucks, that's the ticket, stay right where you are....

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  205. What a ridiculous question ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OK, for the geographically challenged ...

    Canada is a gigantic country. To make any statements about climate, work conditions or lifestyle are impossible unless you narrow it down and state some of your preferences. We have places that NEVER see snow and places that see tons of snow and the wind will rip the flesh off your bones. Where you live and what you like to do makes a huge difference in how you perceive life to be.

    As for work conditions, labour law is set, mostly, at the provincial level and so it varies some from province to province, just like it varies from state to state in the USA. Currently, Alberta and Ontario are pretty business friendly (read: worker unfriendly), but the remaining provinces are governed by much more left leaning governments.

    There is a huge difference in cost of living, depending upon where you set up, with Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver being very expensive to live in. The prairie cities (Calgary, Edmonton, Regina, Winnipeg) are cheaper and the Maritime cities (Halifax, Fredricton, Charlottetown) being the least expensive. Of course, IT jobs will be in the first three cities, mostly, so expect to pony up some dough for basic expenses. It is literally twice as expensive to live in Vancouver, for example, as it is to live in Edmonton where I am located.

    As for attitude ... it varies by where you live, too. Toronto was pretty much like a big US city (complete with a US-like accent) when I lived there, meaning impersonal. Vancouver is like living in California complete with vegetarians and Birkenstocks (except with tons of rain), and Montreal is a very eclectic and worldly city with a ton of neat festivals.

    The overall tax rate isn't appreciably different than the US when you factor in the exchange and what you get for those taxes. Remember that you pay for health insurance separately in the US and if you want a fair comparison for tax rates, add your bill for that onto your taxes you pay in the US when comparing to Canada because it is included here. The sheer number of services that are included in Canada that are NOT in the US is pretty staggering.

    Health Care, contrary to public opinion, is NOT worse in Canada. It is very similar and on a per capita basis, costs less than equivalent service in the States.

    The streets, even in Toronto, are safer than pretty much every major US city, including places like Spokane and St. Paul ... and like Michael Moore discovered, we sometimes don't even lock our doors. If you want to raise kids, Canada is generally a better place to do it than the US, IMO, just from that fact alone. Our standard education system here is worlds better than anything I've seen from the States except for private schools down there.

    The unemployment rate is higher, but when you adjust for the fact that a greater percentage of US jobs are now 24 hrs than in Canada, the rates pretty much end up the same.

    Pay is similar, but in CAD instead of USD, of course. Corporatism is rife here, too, though, and so coming to Canada will lean you slightly more left than in the US, but not terrifically.

  206. good riddance asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the fuck out of this country

    - Canadian working in America

  207. Re:Socialist Country.... by jafac · · Score: 1

    Also, the federal government anyway operates with a budget surplus,

    well, that's because you don't spend as much as the US on a well-trained, exemplary professional army that would never do anything to violate the Geneva Conventions.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  208. Have you looked at what is involved with this? by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

    Because there are a lot of hoops to jump through before you can work in Canada, even as an american. My fiance was recently accepted to a Canadian school, but we couldn't make things work financially.

    For starters, you have the catch 22 of needing a permanent resident visa in order to work there. You have to be pretty well qualified or have a lot of money that you can use to start a business in order to even qualify for a working visa. If you don't have a specific job offer, it is even harder. If a Canadian company wants to hire you, they have to have the job description reviewed by a Canadian Govt. agency to make sure that there is a reason to hire a foriegner to work the job. God help you if you want to work as an Engineer in Canada, there is a whole set of additional hurdles to jump in order to get your PEng certification, which is required in Canada.

    Now, if you qualify for application to permanent residency, you have to pay them $1500cad up front to look at your application, then another $500 if you are approved. You can't do anything bad (illegal) when you are there on this visa, or they will revoke it and kick you out. (Add another $1500 for engineering certs if you need them). Keep in mind that for these 3 years you are not a full citizen and have no voting rights, and have restrictions on travel, too much of which can cause you to loose your visa.

    After 3 years you can pay some more money and apply for citizenship... And I've left out a lot of fees here...

    Not to mention that you can expect high taxes and low salary when you get theere, but you probably knew that.

    We found that it would be a lot cheaper to move to LA if that tells you anything!

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
    1. Re:Have you looked at what is involved with this? by rudedog · · Score: 1

      If you're a US citizen with a bachelor's degree in computer science, all you need is a job offer as a systems analyst. You will be issued a work visa when you cross the border. There may be a nominal fee. I'm not sure what Canada charges, but the US fee is $50, so the Canadian fee is probably similar.

      This is temporary visa (although it can be renewed) and it does not lead to Canadian citizenship.

    2. Re:Have you looked at what is involved with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on what "type" of engineer you are, you may or may not need your PEng.

      For software/firmware/electrical types, you generally don't need to have your PEng.

      Mechies - maybe.

      Civils - yup.

    3. Re:Have you looked at what is involved with this? by caffeineboy · · Score: 1

      You haven't looked into this then. I would be in Canada right now if the work permits were $50.

      The application fee is $550.

      IF you are approved, you have to pay a "Right of Permanent Resident Fee" - that's another $975.

      But to even get a job, your prospective employer has to get your job approved by the Canadian Government before they can even offer it to you.

      It's all here.

      --
      +++ ATH0 +++
    4. Re:Have you looked at what is involved with this? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Look into TN visas; 'trade nafta.'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:Have you looked at what is involved with this? by rudedog · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it is you who hasn't looked into it hard enough. If you have a degree (or sufficient experience) and a job offer, you can get a temporary NAFTA work visa that does not require pre-approval by the government.

      Specifically, "professionals ... may complete an application for an employment authorization upon arrival at a Canadian port of entry; or they may apply ... at a Canadian consulate or embassy in the United States or Mexico ... [for a] processing fee of $150.

      More than $50, but still much less than $1500. But, as I said before, this is not an application for permanent residence; it is a temporary work permit that can be renewed.

      See this publication.

  209. What a lame question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of ridiculous question is this?? It's like asking who has the best trees. Who has the better sandwich, US or Canada?

    All I can say is you'll face the same old shit regardless of where you go, because no matter where you work, you have to contend with one common thing: Other people.

    Office Politics are a universal phenomenon.

    But if you go through with it, welcome to lower wages, higher taxes and crappy weather. Aren't you glad you moved??

  210. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, no one in Canada is serously in debt due to paying medical bills.

    Because they're either dead or received substandard care?

    Good healthcare is a right, not a priveledge of the rich

    What kind of "right" is it that demands that I pay for it? What else are "rights" in this utopia? Free snacks?

  211. religion, media, and politics are different by Qwavel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't really seen these issues addressed yet.

    Canadians are much left of Americans politically. Polls consistently show that only 10% of Canadians would vote Republican. This is reflected in their views on many social and political issues. If you are republican you should move to Alberta which is the most 'American' of the Canadian provinces. I've heard that this is true in all Western countries: most of the population would vote Democrat if they could. (This probably pleases the Democrats, but doesn't bother the Republicans at all.)

    Canadians are less religious than Americans. Well, they are still religious but in a quieter and political way. Religion is a much less politically and geographically focussed in Canada. For example, being strongly religious in the US makes you vastly more likely to vote Republic and to live in certain parts of the country. This is not true in Canada. (BTW, I think that Canada is more Catholic and the US is more protestant).

    The media is also much different. I compared the Canadian, American, and British media during the recent war in Iraq (and much of its aftermath). The American coverage was totally different than that in the other two countries.

    Here's an example of two of these that caught my attention recently. I heard that Fox news is having a spat with the Globe and Mail. Fox is accusing the G&M of being too left wing. What's bizarre about this is that the G&M has been the voice of the business community in Canada for as long as I can remember. No one in Canada would ever accuse it of being to left wing.

    1. Re:religion, media, and politics are different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, I think that Canada is more Catholic and the US is more protestant

      I'd disagree. I would suggest Canada is more left protestant/United Church/United Church of Christ, and America is more Baptist/fundamentalist.

  212. Don't you mean........ by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

    "You get paid less and LIVE more."?

  213. Not surprising. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    All liberals preach the same mantra:

    Do as I say, not as I do.

    1. Re:Not surprising. by 511pf · · Score: 1

      All conservatives spout the same nonsense: I will say the exact opposite of what I do.

  214. Depends on where by phorm · · Score: 1

    As a British Columbian, government scandals in both Province (equiv to a state) and Country have become much more prominent lately.

    Our Prime Minister (equiv President) is severly implicated in a scandal involve hundreds of millions of misallocated (equiv allocated to buddy buddy organizations equiv to stolen) funds. He claims he had no knowledge of such things happening in his previous position (blaming it on the former Prime Minister), at which point he was Finance Minister. How does the guy in charge of money miss something that big?

    Then we have our dear Premier (equiv head of State). He's been nailed in Hawaii on a drunk driving charge. He's also managed to dunk thousands of government jobs (some dunking necessary, but not all at once), roll back healthcare worker wages by 11-15%, and privatize most of government industry. Much of our gov't owned industry has basically been sold off to private interests.

    So basically, if the corporate climate is better, the political is just as bad (worse in some areas, better in others). I'd recommend you look at working someplace in Alberta (no Provincial Tax), and try to avoid Quebec (unless you're fluent in French).

    I might just be a bit bitter and disallusioned, but I am seriously considering looking at my own career opportunities out-of-province and likely out-of-country. Perhaps somebody can comment on Corporate work in Australia for me - that's where I'd rather be.

    1. Re:Depends on where by puppetman · · Score: 1

      Alberta has a flat provincial tax, and no provincial sales tax.

      Just to clarify.

  215. Guns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do not let you bring your gun to work. Wussies.

  216. Re:Just to clarify... socialism doesn't work. by puppetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually the Canadian dollar has jumped due to a weak US dollar. The exchange rate is 1.35 now, rather than 1.65.

    Second, my heating bill is cheap. I live in Vancouver, and it snows maybe once a year. The farther north you go, the better insulated the houses are.

    Third, your tax calculates are way off.

    $8000 CDN (or about $5200 US) is tax free. From there to $35,000, you pay 16%. From 35K to 70K, you pay 22%. From 70K to 113K, you pay 26%. Over 113K, you pay 29%. Then you add provincial taxes onto that. Now, look at this page and compare tax rates between 2003 and 2004. Notice they are going down? Do a Google on Canadian budget surpluses.

    Fourth, Canada is not a socialist country. We are a capitalist country with a more comprehensive social net.

    Finally, yes, MRIs are difficult to get in Canada. But that's pretty recent, with budget cuts to health care; ten years ago, the systems were pretty comparible. Canada is paying off a big national debt, and it costs $30 billion to service it a year. Once that's paid off, healthcare spending will rebound. It's also nice to know that while I'm not getting and MRI on demand, no one else is either :)

    And as someone pointed, out, we can alwasy cross the border to the US and get one for $600 US ($800 CDN).

  217. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
    What kind of "right" is it that demands that I pay for it?
    Good question. I guess you don't want military or police protection, roads or a post office, or court systems, public schools, etc.
  218. Canadian bacon is called... by WebCowboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Peameal or backbacon...I think it is geographically dependent (the term "peameal" seems to be mostly used in Ontario and points east--out here in the west you'd likely get the response "what the heck is peameal?")

    One thing to note is that like Chinese food served in North America, "Canadian Bacon" as served in the US is a pale and inaccurate imitation of the real thing--it is NOT seasoned nor cured the way it actually is in Canada. It's like calling corned beef Montreal Smoked Meat (they're different and it's always disappointing when the former is pawned off as the latter).

    If you like the real thing but can't find it in the US, try ordering it from this site.

    Anyways, to keep this post on-topic, I'd say that "corporate Canada" and "corporate America" are pretty much like "US style Canadian Bacon" and peameal/backbacon--quite similar in general but when you look further you notice differences. Among them:

    * The "competitive drive" is not as pronounced in Canada. Americans seem to place more importance on climbing the ladder, job titles and so on. Canadians strive to move up, but it doesn't seem the emphasis on being "VP" or "Regional Manager". We don't care what our title is so long as we are fairly compensated.

    * Canadian business seems more fixated on process and bureaucracy. My employer is a global corporation, and even within the same company there is more paperwork and business processes seem more combersome than in our American offices.

    * Be prepared for a shock when you see your first paycheque. The income tax, CPP (pension) and EI (employment insurance) deductions will take a bigger chunk of your earnings than you are used to. That and your salary will be a bit smaller to start with (don't worry, it's in Canadian dollars so it won't APPEAR to be significantly less). Overall the tax take is higher but it is taken in bigger chunks. In the US, you have federal, state, municipal taxes, health insurance, this fee, that fee, etc. US government nickels and dimes. In Canada they clobber you in the head and take your money all at ones, more or less (except for the GST).

    * Cost of living is cheaper in Canada overall--Houses cost a bit less, medicare is cheaper, food is a bit cheaper, broadband internet access and cable TV are significantly cheaper (for you slashdotters out there). Makes up for the insanely high gasoline prices.

    There's more but you get the idea...kind of a parallel universe really...

    1. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by empaler · · Score: 1

      I pay ~44% (Denmark), and that's cos I'm low-income (student).
      Here, the higher your earnings, the higher your tax rates. (I only pay 'Bottom tax'. We also have 'Middle Tax' and 'Top Tax' which both adds to the percentage)

      At least I don't ever have to worry about getting my leg broken.

    2. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by cavemanf16 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...broadband internet access and cable TV are significantly cheaper (for you slashdotters out there).

      Uhhh... how many of us here AREN'T slashdotters?!??

    3. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      * Canadian business seems more fixated on process and bureaucracy. My employer is a global corporation, and even within the same company there is more paperwork and business processes seem more combersome than in our American offices.

      Do you by any chance make software in Vancouver? That's spot on with my observations of the Vancouver branch of the company I work for. They have bureaucracy ad absurdum, and it doesn't do very much good. Process is a good thing, and our American offices are sorely lacking it it, yet the process-burdened Vancouver office consistently produces our worst quality software. As in, the uptime of said software is measured in days. I was doing some tests once that involved a Vancouver produced product and accidentally left it running over the weekend. When I came in Monday the system wasn't accepting any network connections. I turned on the monitor and discovered the system was out of virutal memory. A memory leak in the Vancouver program had eaten it all in less than 60 hours. And by the way, this system had a gig of RAM.

      A little bit of an off topic rant. Standard business processes can be a good thing, but if you have them, then please make sure they're actually accomplishing something other than killing a lot of trees to make the documents.

      (No, I'm not going to say what company I work for.)

    4. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1, Insightful

      * Be prepared for a shock when you see your first paycheque. The income tax, CPP (pension) and EI (employment insurance) deductions will take a bigger chunk of your earnings than you are used to.

      Also be in shock when you realize your standard of living is higher, life expectancy is greater and your health care doesnt cost you an additional $4000(giveortake) per year.

      Be amazed when your family is not killed in the invasion of foreign nations, and be astounded by your overall sense of wellbeing resulting in the sense of responsibiltiy-for-ones-community.

    5. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Well, we do produce more oil here than we consume.

    6. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by GolfBoy · · Score: 1

      'Employment insurance'. Right. Because I need insurance in case I get employed. It used to be called - before the lunatics took over the asylum - 'unemployment insurance'.

      Just so you know what your money is going toward. Maybe you agree; maybe you don't. But 'employment insurance'!! Give me an effing break.

    7. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Dravik · · Score: 1

      In the US we also are taxed in the same way. They call them tax brackets and I think there are 5 or 6 of them. Currently the highest federal tax rate is 35%. Even many Americans don't seem to notice that our federal and state governments are have very different areas of responsibility and most areas of state policy (like tax rates) cannot be directly dictated by the federal government. Back to taxes, the state tax rate is set by each state. There are 3 to 4 states with no income tax at all. My state, Alabama, has a maximum tax rate of around 8% (not sure on that one, I haven't got there yet)

      On the broken leg thing, If a person enters a hospital in the US the hospital must treat them for all serious problems wether or not they can afford to pay. If your poor without insurance and you break your leg every hospital in the country WILL treat you.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    8. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying that it should be unemployment insurance for when I become unemployed?

      That would mean that car insurance is .. for when I get a car? No, it's for when I lose my car.

      Perhaps somewhere in the universe you can get unemployment insurance, and death insurance, and car-crash insurance, but from what I've seen the noun (car, employment, life) is what you insuring. Not the ill fated event.

      I guess it turns out that the lunatics just corrected their grammar.

    9. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you're reasonably well-off without insurance than you're pretty much guaranteed to be poor without insurance by the time you're done.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    10. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Do you pay car insurance in case you get a car some day? Do you pay for life insurance in case you get a life some day?

      No, you pay for car insurance so that you'll be covered if you lose your car (or it gets wrecked, or you wreck something else with it, etc.) You pay for life insurance in case you lose your life, and you pay for employment insurance in case you lose your employment.

      Makes more sense now than the old way, really.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    11. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's accident insurance, death and dismemberment insurance, medical insurance, theft and fire insurance, and it used to be unemployment insurance for half a century until the government decided that the name gives us the impression we are entitled benefits upon being downsized. So the government changed the name to employment insurance, increased the waiting period and reduced the number of weeks of entitlement, but also increased premiums and built up $20 billion surplus. Then there's the missing $1 billion dollars from the same ministry. We might get a little bit of that back before the election call.

    12. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We pay employment insurance because we are forced to. Not that many of us get any of it back. It's long waiting period followed by a short entitlement period. The entitlement is about a third of the former average weekly salary, and capped at just over $400 a week last time I managed to qualify. The reason given for changing the name to employment insurance was that it insures we will try to get a job, any job, quickly. The result is people grab the first menial job that comes along because they can't wait 8 weeks for the first entitlement, and they know it won't pay the rent anyway. A year later they get laid off again and grab the first menial job that comes along again. They can't hold out until the right job in the right field comes along, and if they apply for benefits too many times they can get blacklisted by employment insurance. So no, employment insurance does not insure us against losing employment. It insures the government against having to pay out while we try to find a job that matches our majors.

    13. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Cybernetic+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I was laid off in September from a local software company and after my severerance pay ran out, plus a two week period, I was collecting employment insurance. I've been collecting it ever since. I even started to work at a factory making Honda parts because the computer market for 6 year old skills is non-existant. Anyone looking for a Delphi programmer? ;P

    14. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Makes up for the insanely high gasoline prices

      Oh. So you're paying $8/gallon now are you? Perhaps you should drive in England and then complain about high gas prices..

      K.

    15. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      Yes, in the US, if you have an emergency and can get to a hospital they will treat you. Of course, they will also charge you and if you don't have insurance and can't pay there's a good chance your credit will go down the tubes and you'll have to start living from paycheck to paycheck out of your car.

      Leg breaking isn't the problem here. It's long term care. If you have a chest pain, but can't afford to just go see a doctor (yes, there are free clinics, but they are understaffed, etc.), you'll just have to wait for your first heart attack to actually see what that chest pain was all about.

      And then there's prescription cost. Heck, there's a big hoopla here in the states about how we can import drugs from Canada for cheaper than we can buy them here.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
    16. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I notice the same things. I moved from the states to Halifax area. I think it has been the best move. The healthcare sux for the first 6 months, but that f'n Aetna for ya... My US company is paying US Healthcare for the first 6 months, then I will be on the Canadian health care system.

      Don't you just love COBRA, the company pays $1200 a month for me and my family. COBRA is meant to assist while you are laid off.... who the fuck can afford that!!!! I was in that situation in the states 2 years ago, and the cost was $1100 per month, sorry when the nice Unemployment checks cap at $470... it came down to Food/Rent or Healthcare.

      Halifax is very nice, clean, medium size city. We did get hit with a Hurricane, which I missed by a week, and then a major record setting blizzard almost 4 feet in 24 hours. When all was done, the snow was upto the windows on my neighbors minivan. :) that was cool - Snow piles that were 16 to 20 feet high! Kids were climbing them touching the street lights. LOL!

      I did notice the work ethic is less back-stabbing here. People work more as a team then the Fuck You It's My Turn attitudes in the states or the Not In Front Of Me Asshole driving skills. I notice drivers are very different here... I mean they actually are very defensive although you do get the rude asshole from time to time... assholes are everywhere.

      Pedestrians rule here.. I mean they literally do - every crosswalk a person is at, you stop dead. If you don't you are scorned by the peds, all kinds of obscenities, and if a cop is near by, you just got your first ticket. People here walk into crosswalks, don't even wait for it to be clear, its like "Im walking here". Usually you hear cars skidding, everyone knows "Tourists".

      I thought man, anyone here ever visits Montreal or anywhere in the US, they will become speed bumps.

      I thought of that, it is actually very curtious for the drivers to allow peds the right of way. The DMV here is awesome, I never seen a high tech, well organized, efficient system as the Nova Scotia DMV. :)

      As for taxes, do the math, I was paying more in the US. My wife said it for years, man there are a lot of hidden taxes in the US. One paying for water is laughed at, there is no city tax, no Privilidge to Work tax, no school tax, no property tax, no garbage tax, no recyling tax, the list goes on. I agree, the US nickle and dimes the taxpayer to the point you only think you are paying low taxes. Plus no more weekly contributions to healthcare, I remember that starting at $4/week almost 8 years ago, when I left it was $55/week. Hmm someone is fuckin the US workers.

      Oh almost forgot, the mass transit system here is unreal. Many people use buses here. I live close to work so I fill my car every 2 weeks. Everything is close here, you don't have to drive all over the place for something. Where I used to live, I averaged about 1.5 tanks a week because everything was spread out.

      Lastly, the beer is awesome! There must be 10 or more breweries here. :) There must be about 50 bars, 100 or more resturants, every kind of food you can think of, awesome scenery, musical and other cultural events, strangers actually say Hi.

      TV is awesome, well what I watch. I never got into sitcoms or any of the US crap anyway. I like the CBC and Comedy network (Comedy central) uncensored. The first time I heard SHIT used in the evening news, I was like Whoa! Holy Shit! Then when I heard the word Fuck used, I was like Holy Fuck! This is unreal! But the kicker, Janet Jackson's breast - LOL CBC must of shown it 14 to 20 times that night... LOL no censoring smudge or black box here, her boob exposed over and over and over and over, every friggen angel imaginable... black and white, color, I think they bought all the feeds and show them all. Some were even extreme closeups! LOL! I told my wife, Canada TV rules! T

    17. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Makes up for the insanely high gasoline prices.

      Canada has some of the world's cheapest gas prices
      http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/ene_ga s_pri#

    18. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're reasonably well-off without insurance then you're too irresponsible to maintain your wealth anyway.

    19. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also be in shock when Paul Martin and the Liberals take efforts to have that quality of life (I think that's what you meant?) and health care erode. And you should be "thankful" it's happening because the biggest alternative is the Republican Party of Canada. For those who are not familiar with Canadian orthography, we spell Republican as C-A-N-A-D-I-A-N A-L-L-I-A-N-C-E. They recently took over the Progressive Conservative Party and got rid of the Progressive.

    20. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      Aside from the flamebait way this was written, it's kinda true.
      I live in Austin TX, moved from Ottawa, ON. I have to say that Americans are stressed. Day to day life is all rushed and everything just seems so tense. Ottawa was like a vacation looking back on it. I'd gladly pay the insane taxes, at least you get something for it. I pay hundreds in taxes and another hundred in healthcare every check and what do i get? Wars, paying for stupid corporate lawsuits, paying so GWB can vacation 80% of his presidency, etc...
      If there was one way to describe life in Canada it would be "Simple".

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    21. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      Compared to typical incomes?

      In South Africa fuel costs around CAD$3.3/US$2.3 per gallon; but contrast that against the average person having an income before tax of CAD$6000/US$4300 per ANNUM. Even I as a highly paid software developer earn around CAD$2000/US$2800 per month. The cheapest car you can buy today - the tiny Daihatsu Charade - costs CAD$16000/US$11500. Something like a Toyota Corolla 1600 costs at least twice that. The bank prime rate sit at around 13.5% and they typically charge about 20% on a credit card. Essentially all this means is that I can barely afford a home big enough for a family, plus a car, and most people can't afford even that.

    22. Re:Canadian bacon is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep up the mindless, pointless, inflammatory, and incorrect rhetoric. It provides me endless entertainment to see someone so sadly out of touch with reality.

      Plus a place to assign those mod points I would otherwise not have used for modding up people with intelligent commentary or opinions; or even *gasp* useful information! For you, SubtleNuance, I get to use -1 Flamebait! -1 Troll! -1 Offtopic! -1 Tree Hugging Moron!

      (No rational person has a problem with exploring green alternatives, but you're a pretty nasty greenie shill and I sometimes wonder if you realize the damage you do to your cause by your incessant blabbering. Why don't you give me some more of that "embodied energy" wail again, since the public transportation I ride to work is made largely of aluminum?)

  219. I'm 22 by empaler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And I live on another continent. I've heard it at least a dozen times. It's fairly disgusting.

    1. Re:I'm 22 by kir · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've heard it at least a dozen times. It's fairly disgusting.

      What? The bacon or the beer?

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
  220. a review by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

    as someone who works with people from across the country on a daily basis, a quick overview:

    - people from BC are a lot like people from ontario, only more impatient and snobby. probably due to the crappy string of provincial governments they've elected. occasionally you get a very happy person. it's probably the good weed.

    - people from alberta are pretty laid back due to the lack of provincial sales tax or income tax, and the fact that they're the only province that can safely wear cowboy boots/hat and not get laughed at

    - people from sask are cool. they'll complain that their system is down, 3 hours after it goes down. their reasoning - 'we figured you were doing somethig, and didn't want to bother yuo. if you can fix it today, cool'

    - people from manitoba are happy when it's not snowing or buggy. they aren't happy very often

    - people from northern ontario/southern ontario are fine, friendly upstanding people that are mildly impatient.

    - people from toronto or ottawa are bitchy and pushy and demand that you fix their problem NOW, despite that fact that the machine has beendown for 2 weeks and they wre too lazy to fix it themselves. avoid them at all costs. probably infected with sars anyways.

    - people from quebec are french. 'nuff said

    - people from NB and NS (new brunswick and nova scotia) are friendlly, polite, outgoing and generally the best people on earth. unless you take their booze away. most of the woman are named betty.

    - people from pei .. well, they don't call much. I wouldn't worry about em.

    - newfies are the funniest people alive

    I think it's clear where you should look for work. having said that, STAY IN THE US and don't take our sysadmin jobs :)

    welcome to Canada eh, the land of good beer, hot wymmin in parkas and hockey night in canada.

    cheers.

    t.

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    1. Re:a review by Nos. · · Score: 1

      people from sask are cool. they'll complain that their system is down, 3 hours after it goes down. their reasoning - 'we figured you were doing somethig, and didn't want to bother yuo. if you can fix it today, cool'
      How true. As a Saskatchewan resident I'll vouch for this. I worked on a help desk for a year in Regina for a Sask ISP. When a system went down, we would get a flood of calls, but only 1 in a 100 was actually upset about it. Most politely asked if their was a problem and we're happy to learn it was the ISPs problem and not something on their machine.

  221. Whoa. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Myth #1 - Taxes are really high.
    Reality: not really. You don't pay 50% until you make over $100,000.
    And you don't call that high???? The US has 401k's that are tax free until withdrawal. We also have no inhertence tax unless you have over a million dollars or so to give away.

    Depends on where you come from. You just said that taxes are at least 35% and could be 50%

    Other things to note: health care is essentially free.
    It's only free if you don't value your hard earned money. Taxes are an expense. And if your last name is Martin and you are an important government official, it appears you can pay for private services. So much for an uncorrupt system

    In most parts of Canada, you can find true wilderness an hour or less from where you live.

    The same can be said in the US.

    1. Re:Whoa. by Kombat · · Score: 1
      Reality: not really. You don't pay 50% until you make over $100,000.
      And you don't call that high????


      That is high, but the original poster was mistaken. Canada's top tax bracket is nowhere near 50%. Canada's personal tax rates, for 2003, are as follows:

      • On income up to and including $35,000 : 16%
      • On income greater than $35,000 but less than $70,000: 22%
      • On income greater than $70,000 but less than $113,804: 26%
      • On income greater than $113,804: 29%


      Now, there's provincial tax to be calculated on top of that too, but provincial tax rates are generally lower, and are only computed on what you're already paying in Federal tax. For example, if you made $35,000 in Ontario, then you'd owe about $4,300 in federal income tax ($35,000 minus the basic tax-free personal amount of about $8,000, time 16%). The provincial tax rate for that amount in Ontario on that amount would be about 15%, but it's 15% of the $4,300, not of the original amount. So your provincial amount would only be about $645.

      In most parts of Canada, you can find true wilderness an hour or less from where you live.

      The same can be said in the US.


      The point I believe he was trying to make is that Canada is much less densely populated than the US. We have about 1/10 of your population, and a greater amount of area. Add to that the fact that the vast majority of our population is concentrated in the southernmost portions of the country (along the US border), and you reach the conclusion that most of our country is complely undeveloped and unpopulated. It's trivial to find thousands of square kilometers of unpopulated wilderness for extremely remote camping trips, hundreds of miles from any cities, where you can see all the stars in the sky and be truly close to nature.
      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  222. DIfferences I noticed on my recent trip to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made a 17 day trip to Canada late last year. I stayed mainly in the Quebec province. I loved it. As an Australian, I really felt at home: except for the accent and the driving. The people were friendly, and quite helpful.
    I did a side trip to the US (Boston only) for a couple of days, and for wahtever reason, I felt intimidated. American flags were every where. That really put me off.
    In Canada, I only saw the flags on government buildings, just like in Australia.
    My 2 cents

  223. MOD PARENT UP by love2hateMS · · Score: 1

    Parent is not a troll. I knew someone who came from Canada after waiting SIX months for an examination with a specialist. She died of cancer here in the States without ever even seeing a doctor in Canada. (She was a native Canadian, btw). She thought she had stomach cancer. It turns out that she DIDN'T! She just had a terrible infection. If she had been examined soon enough she would probably have lived. By the time she got help here in the U.S., it was too late.

    What is more remarkable is that her sister's husband was a doctor who at one time was part of the Canadian national health care agency (I don't know what it is called). He got so fed up with it he moved his practice to the U.S. twenty years ago and has no desire to ever go back.

    I'm not bashing Canada here... I mean they gave us Michael J. Fox didn't they? Seriously, Canada is a great country, but their health care system is not a model we should be following. Our own system is bad enough. (Can anyone say "tort reform"?)

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      These sorts of things happen in ANY health care system. Why?

      You can never spend too much. There is ALWAYS something more you can buy, some other test to do, something else. At some point, you have to set some rules.

      For every case like this of someone slipping through the system, you will find at least a proportionate number falling through in the American system.. and I suspect, more, but that's just a guess.

      In Canada, we decided those rules are not going to
      be based on who has more money. It's as simple as that. Equal access for all. It's not perfect, by any means, but you will find that most canadians agree with the concept.

      A doctor moved to the US.. well, of course. They stand to make a lot more money in the US. Despite that, we still have lots of top quality doctors finishing top quality medical schools and living out their lives in Canadian hospitals.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Just a couple of points....

      Approximately 100 000 Americans die because of medical error in the US. A similar per capita figure exists for Canada. -- search medline or some thing similar for the reference.

      What you've presented is a testimonial, not evidence one way or the other.

      Canada spends 50% on health care on a per capita basis relative to the US. If you search google you'll find that in many instances the impact on overall health does not differ between the two countries. Of course there are differences but they are not as clear some would like to believe.

  224. As a Canadian by nuggz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my experience for middle class individuals in comperable areas it is about the same. The spread is wider in the US. Upper middle class is a bit higher, lower is a bit lower.
    Now lets attack the myths.
    #1 Taxes
    They are nearly 50% in Ontario.
    http://money.canoe.ca/Columnists/Leather dale/2004/ 05/11/455050.html
    Note this includes income tax, sales tax, property tax, and the hidden taxes (user fees for government services, sin taxes on alcohol and tobacco, and gas taxes.
    #2 Lifestyle
    In my opinion you need somewhere about halfway between the exchange rate and the direct dollar figure assuming comperable areas. $40k US would be about $50k CDN
    #3 Unemployment
    I agree basically, Also note different states have different laws.
    #4 You have to play the game right and have skills, it takes a year or so. But some people may take years. And of course demand occupations or those wtih big money are easier.

    EI only covers maternity leave for a short time, maternity 15 weeks, parental 20, and sickness 15. I'd check it out before I knocked up my gf.
    Hockey is easily the most popular, but so are other sports. You can go to a lot of sports bars and get any sport that is played. European football (soccer) time gets pretty nuts in some areas.
    Work environments are about the same, but you really have to consider the city attitude, working in different US cities probaly has about as much variation as working across Canada.
    You forgot coffee, everyone drinks it, and there are coffee shops everywhere (I'm from Ontario remember)

    1. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They are nearly 50% in Ontario.
      http://money.canoe.ca/Columnists/Leather dale/2004/ 05/11/455050.html
      Note this includes income tax, sales tax, property tax, and the hidden taxes (user fees for government services, sin taxes on alcohol and tobacco, and gas taxes.


      If you include all hidden taxes, I easily hit 50% in the US. When you add in what I have to pay for own health insurance for myself and my family, using post-tax dollars, Canada easily wins.

    2. Re:As a Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent summary (both you and the OP). One thing:

      "EI only covers maternity leave for a short time, maternity 15 weeks, parental 20, and sickness 15. I'd check it out before I knocked up my gf."

      Nope. My wife's been collecting for 5 months now, and I can assure you it's a full 6 months maternity and 6 months parental (minus a two week waiting period). Max benefit works out to $335/week *after* tax. Believe me, it's the cat's ass.

      Not sure where you got the 15/20/15 weeks from. Sounds more like a private company benefits top-up allowance.

  225. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RRSPs are revenue neutral for the federal government. What you don't pay in tax now, you'll pay in tax later... And since the money's stuck in your RRSP, it isn't as if you can use it...

    Therefore claiming a 20% rate is true, but self-deceiving.

  226. As an American working in Montreal... by thenextpresident · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an American working in Montreal for more than 2 years now, I have always said that Montreal is a wonderful city, and in my opinion, the best city I have ever been to (and I have been to quite a few, including Europe and the US). The people here are fantastic, and it's just a wonderful environment. And even for a non french speaking person like myself, adjusting to the city and the culture was no problem.

    Now, granted, I had some help (I moved up here for work and for my girl, who I met online (IRC), and yes, we are still together), so I may have had it easier.

    But still, it's a great city. Much more free up here than in the US, as the minds of people are more European, and much more liberal.

    --
    Jason Lotito
    1. Re:As an American working in Montreal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It totally defeats the purpose of bragging on Slashdot that you have a girlfriend if you tell us in the very next phrase that she was an IRC troll (appearance, not behavior).

    2. Re:As an American working in Montreal... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Not surprised by your reaction as you are in Montreal. Montreal has a tendency to be a very tolerant city as there is a huge diversity of people and ethnicities (the ones that Parizeau wanted to kick out of Quebec) so they are very friendly and welcoming. (read the last line of my first posting. Now go to Chicoutimi and try to live there with no French. You will find up in that area people are a tad different. Then again the blood up there runs Blue (it is definitely Separatist country)

  227. Wow! by rauhest · · Score: 1

    Oh, great. Let's say I live in China and want to know how our corporate life compares to that of, say, India. Or let's try Norvay vs. Finland. Or Brazilia vs. Argentine. Or whatever. Will my story be accepted, too? (Crossing my fingers :))

  228. Try God. by MickLinux · · Score: 0, Troll

    Quite simply, if you've had it with corporate America, I can bet that either it is because the promises are false, or they are true and worthless.

    Quite simply, rather than just picking up and going to another country -- which might be decent, or might be a very bad move [let's not pick up and go to Iraq, unless we want to be kidnapped and murdered] -- it might be good to ask God what he wants, in prayer, and then start trying to follow his lead as completely as possible.

    To do that, though, you're going to have to read your Bible, and pray, and especially take God's word seriously.

    Seriously.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:Try God. by mabu · · Score: 1

      God works for Halliburton now. Haven't you heard?

    2. Re:Try God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, didn't you hear? God is Dead!

  229. I used to work for Nortel by krygny · · Score: 1

    A lot of people used to work for Nortel.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
  230. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  231. Over-generalizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    weee an entire thread about how "everybody" in country x is like this, and "everybody" in country y is another way....

    You just can't do that. Different parts of countries will be...well...different! You can move to canada if you want, and still be in the same kind of company you hate. It is not a magical happy place where everything is perfect and sugar coated.

    Considering the total cost of moving over there, I think you'd be much better off looking in your general area first, and neighboring states.

  232. Oops, spelling :) by rauhest · · Score: 1
    Norway, not Norvay, and Brazil, not Brazilia, of course.

    All right, this is slashdot, so that's still not a valid reason for rejecting my story ;)

  233. from the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To save everyone from wading through this report... it concludes that the unemployment measurement discrepancy "accounted for 17 per cent of the gap and its relative importance has been growing over time." The rest is truly lower economic activity.

  234. Wrong. by ShinmaWa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are you aware that the unemployment rate here in the US does not count those who's unemployment benifits ran out and who are still jobless?

    Wrong.

    The US Census Bureau (on behalf of the Bureau of Labor Statistics) determines the unemployment rate using a survey called the Current Population Survey (CPS). The definition of unemployed is:

    1) Not currently employed.
    2) Available to get a job.
    3) Actively looked for work in the last 4 weeks.

    There is nothing about unemployment benefits in here at all. This definition of unemployment is used around the world including Canada, Mexico, Australia, Japan, and all of the countries in the European Economic Community. Therefore, these numbers are also good for international comparisons.

    During my college days, I worked as a surveyor for the USCB at the Tucson Telephone Center. I lived and breathed the CPS for a full week every month as we tried to get through our share of 50,000 surveys. A lot of fun, lemme tell ya. :)

    --
    The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    1. Re:Wrong. by nikster · · Score: 1

      hmm... that means you are not counting the bums on the street - or anyone else without a telephone, meaning anyone without a home or not being able to afford a telephone.

      nice way to cut out the poor...

      i don't want to imply that is done on purpose in order to polish the unemployment numbers, but i am sure it's a side-effect no one really minds too much.

      [note: where i live, we count those guys, too]

    2. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is nothing about unemployment benefits in here at all. This definition of unemployment is used around the world including Canada, Mexico, Australia, Japan, and all of the countries in the European Economic Community. Therefore, these numbers are also good for international comparisons.

      Back in Norway, I've seen people operating with two different numbers, 'the international standard' and the real numbers.

      The international definition when used here leaves out people who are still looking for a job, but haven't applied for one in the last four weeks, and people who currently only are employed part-time who want full-time jobs aswell as people who have gotten a job, but still not started in it.

      According to SSB in Des. 2003 only 122000 out of 244000 claiming they were unemployed actually met the criteria for unemployment. Also 85000 part-time employed people wanted to work an addional total of 30000 'job years'.

      I've also *heard* that the US treats its (extremely large) prison population differently when counting than we do, but I have no clue as to the validity of such claims.

    3. Re:Wrong. by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      hmm... that means you are not counting the bums on the street - or anyone else without a telephone, meaning anyone without a home or not being able to afford a telephone.

      That's a wild conclusion you jumped to there... and very inaccurate. Actually... There were two sets of people doing interviews:

      1. The telephone centers (Tucson, AZ and Hagerstown, MD) called the CATI team, or Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing

      2. a small army of surveyors with special laptops called the CAPI (Computer Assisted PERSONAL Interviewing) team who gathered those people that the telephone centers couldn't get to.

      I, of course, was on the CATI team. But that doesn't mean we were the ONLY ones collecting the data. You shouldn't jump to conclusions like that.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    4. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS.

      Anyone not receiving benefits that is looking for a job outside of the Labor Department system; not logging their attempts etc. Is counted as not available for employment. Which is crap.

      How do I know? Because it's the position my wife's in.

    5. Re:Wrong. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      This definition of unemployment is used around the world including Canada, Mexico, Australia, Japan, and all of the countries in the European Economic Community.

      Can you point me to a place that defines unemployment in Canada? Someone else posted that the requirement that you be actively seeking work is not counted in Canada, but is in the US. That is, if you are not employed, looked for work for a while, then gave up (but are still ready and willing to take a job, if offered), you are not unemployed in the US. I'm interested if that really is the case in other countries.

  235. Why do so many just assume we will accept them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it ironic that someone from Canada (or any other country for that matter) contemplating a move to the US would first find this very restrictive. Why does it seem that anyone who contemplates a move to Canada just seems to assume that they will be accepted into this Country? I know an individual who tried to move to the US to work as a computer technician who eventually gave up because of the political restrictions, restrictive forms and permissions required. Any Comments?

    1. Re:Why do so many just assume we will accept them? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I think you misread the parent post. The poster was an American who worked for a Canadian company when it set up offices in the U.S. The management was primarily Canadian, with Brits and Australians thrown into the mix; thus, the company had a Canadian feel to its business culture.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  236. Re:For new Immigrants Canada is a tax haven for 5 by thebatlab · · Score: 1

    Hi, my name is "Paragraph". Please feel free to take advantage of my services next time you feel like making a post.

  237. Nope... by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

    One word: Sleemans.

    God I miss decent beer.
    Anyone know how one can get hooked up down here?

    -b

  238. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good healthcare is a right, not a priveledge of the rich,

    Yes, we expect a logical opinion on such matters from one going by the name 'trotski', don't we? Not that your spelling of privledge is much better...

    Thing is, rich Canadians just go to the states for treatment. Why not boost our own economy by providing the services locally?

  239. In writing.... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    I always use USofAn. you-zoe-fan, has a nice pronounce too.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  240. Study gone awry by unixfan · · Score: 1

    Now there's a study that's gone awry.

    The gun ratio is much higher in Canada, where hunting is a more common thing. Maybe if you find some small redneck area in the US and compared to Ontario you could find a reversed situation. Per capita Canada has many more weapons.

  241. Language barrier? by kc8jhs · · Score: 1

    It's hard to say how different it is from the US. Do the Canadians have a word for greed too?

  242. Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't worked in either the US or Canada, but I have worked in New Zealand, Australia and England. I've also worked in companies with between 7 and 3000 employees. It's not the country or the size of the company that make the job what it is, it's the people, and people are the same whereever you go.

    And even when I worked for large companies, it was no different than working for a medium sized company. I didn't really know anyone outside of my division of 30 odd people. There were a whole lot more levels of bosses, but they were just a bunch of people I never met.

  243. The real scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is coming from someone who grew up in Canada and lives in California now...

    A key thing to keep in mind is your political stripe - if you are centrist here in the US, you are right wing in Canada. If you are right wing here, you will go nuts in Canada.

    Generally, people are more pleasant in Canada in day to day life, however, when you are in need, Americans are more likely to reach out a helping hand because they haven't been conditioned to think its the government's job to take care of you.

    Canadians are far more risk averse when it comes to business and that impacts every part of corporate life (both in good ways and bad).

    Assuming you get the same $ salary, thecost of living is about the same or cheaper on soft goods and services (e.g. food, dry cleaning) but way more expensive on imported hard goods (e.g. playstation games, cars...the average car here is an upper class luxury in Canada). This difference is due to exchange rates exclusively. Some times the importers charge a bit lower in Canada because nobody could afford it otherwise.

    Get used to paying about 15% sales tax on EVERYTHING (goods and services...except in Alberta).

    Get used to working for branch offices of American companies where decisions are always made outside of your Canadian division. You are far less likely to be working for a division that creates products - more likely to be working for a sales, support, service organization.

    Health care is generally better in Canada for day to day office visits for the average person. However, if you need to see a specialist or need high end diagnostics, prepare to wait months to a year. Everyone beats their chests about how health care is so much better in Canada (it is one of the only things they can think of defining them, after all) but in my experience both systems average out about the same - they are both facing rapidly increasing costs in the face of relatively infinite demand and have two different systems for rationing the service. If you look closely, the two systems are coming closer together out of necessity.

    Good luck!

  244. Re:Just to clarify... socialism doesn't work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Try to schedule an MRI for a brain tumor scan.
    Funny you mention that, my dad was in to see a doctor last week and the doctor ordered an MRI and he's going in to get it next week. Less than 2 weeks from the time it was called for. Your comment, like most, are very generalized and hardly accurate.
  245. Labour Laws by cgreuter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that hasn't been mentioned is Canadian labour laws. In Canada, they are:

    1. Reasonably pro-worker. I'd rank them as very roughly in the same league as those of the most liberal US states (but IANAL). For example, it's illegal for a company to make employees train their Indian replacements before they are laid off. Really.
    2. Federal laws. That is, they are consistant nation-wide. (This is the case with pretty much all laws more serious than traffic and littering).

    There's a lot more legal recourse here, so when the companies screw over their employees, they at least have to use lube.

    1. Re:Labour Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Point 1 is partially wrong. Canadian employment law is relatively pro-employee compared to the average US state (more like the more liberal ones like California) but there's nothing unlawful about telling an employee to train his replacement.

      Point 2 is completely wrong. The Canadian federal government has virtually no authority to regulate employment relationships outside a few industries (like banking and interprovincial transportation). The US federal government has nearly limitless authority to do so, even if they leave the bulk of the regulation up to the individual states.

    2. Re:Labour Laws by cgreuter · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...but there's nothing unlawful about telling an employee to train his replacement.

      It is illegal to fire someone in a nasty or humiliating way and it was recently ruled that forcing the employees to train their (foreign outsourced) replacements counted as such.

      And no, I don't have a citation handy. I learned this by talking to my cousin the labour lawyer. (What? Hearsay? On Slashdot? Never!)

      The Canadian federal government has virtually no authority to regulate employment relationships outside a few industries

      Ahem. Cough cough .

  246. Re:Don't Get Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to blame Canada, but only for sending us Jim Carrey.

  247. informed decision by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

    As it is, your question comes across as "I have decided to move to Canada, what's it like there?". Shouldn't you have informed yourself about Canadian corporate life *before* making the decision to move to Canada?

  248. As a Canadian by nostriluu · · Score: 1

    I would like to say all the stereotyping, particularly towards french people, is rather pathetic. I'm really quite saddened by this behavior, especially when I see it being rated upwardly. I have known many french people, and they are all different, but most have been great people. Certainly nicer than the close minded stereotyping nerds and other rednecks.

    What anyone thinks this behavior achieves I don't know, but I am guessing they are very regressive people whose opinions are not worth very much in the first place.

  249. WARNING: Canadian TV is Censored by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2) David Dodge did same thing here in Canada, and, for the first time ever was successful in controlling it where you Americans failed -- there was no recession.

    No recession here? Hahahahaha!

    Okay, maybe there wasn't a recession in the strictest sense, but I can assure you...

    Personally, I'll go stateside in a second as soon as George Dubya is out of office. He's even more draconian than the Canadian government "protecting" us from unpleasant things and "erosion of Canadian culture".

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:WARNING: Canadian TV is Censored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty amazing considering when Kids in the Hall was on the air, Scott could drop the f-bomb in prime time on CBC and no one blinked.

    2. Re:WARNING: Canadian TV is Censored by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1
      No, there was no recession here....we outperformed all of the other G7 nations by a lot...of course things were bad, we're exporters...our customers couldn't afford to buy anything, but somehow we did amazingly well.

      I have a few questions: When was this? Why hasn't anybody heard about it? And why was it "not available"? That page implies it was because it was a standup act about stereotypes, yet that very comedian and many many others have done acts on that topic on the CBC (Just for Laughs for instance) and nothing is said.

      Perhaps it wasn't a case of censorship but that some licensing issues prevented it from airing in Canada. Often stations get blacked out due to licensing restrictions...which may or may not have to do with the CRTC but has nothing to do with censorship. Heck, it could have been the US FCC preventing it from being exported. Truth is, unless you know somebody in the CRTC, FCC, or CNN, I doubt you know what it was.

    3. Re:WARNING: Canadian TV is Censored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya right, i've lived in the US and Canada... cable tv in canada plays sopranos (not censored at all), sex and the city and a lot of other good shows/movies that aren't censored one bit.. did i mention those shows play on normal cable?

      on top of that "the movie network" which is like HBO has hardcore porn after 12pm. TMN isnt a PPV service, it's simply a movie channel.

    4. Re:WARNING: Canadian TV is Censored by jaraxle · · Score: 1
      As well, as stated above the "f word" could be dropped on KitH anytime, and this was during early prime time on the CBC, not to mention the ahead-of-its-time stance on gay issues.

      Just the other night, I was watching The Buzz on the Comedy Network, and they were going to have a piece on vulgarity, right after a commercial break. Right before they broke for commercials, the announcer said "That's some fucked up shit, motherfucker". BAM, during prime time (this was at about 10:20pm).

      On top of all that, I used to watch the Tom Green Show regularily when he was still in Canada (first with his small budget show, then when he was with the Comedy Network). I stopped watching as soon as he moved to MTV in the States because they didn't show nearly half of the stupid shit he did because it was too "outrageous" for American TV. If you only saw Tom on MTV and thought he sucked, you should have seen what he was allowed to do while on Canadian TV. Much better...

      ~jaraxle

  250. Re: Don't forget the pot! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    It's the best in the world, and if they catch you smoking it, you get a ticket!

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  251. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    that you have to be "rick" to afford it
    That's a good thing for the Tom, Dick, and Harry's
  252. GTF out of the Insurance business first by serutan · · Score: 1

    In my 25 years of programming, mostly as a contractor, I have found that insurance companies and banks are the worst companies to work for, in terms of PHBs, interdepartmental politics and ridiculous, nit-picky rules. Safeco even had a LUNCH BELL. If someone had suggested giving out free soda, the whole top floor probably would have had a group heart attack. I seriously doubt that the types of people who run Canadian insurance companies are all that different.

    Some people with narrow skills may get trapped in one field. My brother in law for example is an Oracle Financials expert but can't configure email. But as a sysadmin I would think you are pretty portable. My advice is to try other types of companies before you up and leave the country. Unless you have like, a Canadian girlfriend or something, eh.

  253. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been to Eastern and Western Canada (never middle Canada) several times.

    It seemed to be very expensive to live there. I live on the low side of middle class in a moderately priced West Coast USA city, and BC seemed to be rather expensive. Especially the provincial coupled with the federal sales tax, the various GSTs PSTs VATs whatever. The last time that I went I was really happy to get back to Washington state where everything was cheaper.

    La situation en Quebec est plus difficulte si vous ne parlez pas ce que on crois serait francais la.

    If you couldn't read the sentence above as fast as the one before it, reconsider moving to Quebec. They tend to rather touchy about their quaint local legacy language. If you studied a little French in school because French was the cool language to study instead of studying Spanish (which is the only language that Americans should seriously consider studying as it's not even a 'foreign' language here anymore), well then, yes, check out Quebec. Do, however, spend a few months watching DVDs with the language track set to French beforehand.
    French is deceptively difficult language for Americans: it's spoken about 20-30% faster than English and has many subtle differences in the vowel sounds that aren't recognized in English. By the way, if you set the DVD audio track to French and the subtitles to French, you'll find that they are rarely the same. It seems that the movies generally get translated twice at different times, once for audio and once for titles. Plus neither of the two translator teams go by the original screenplay. Bit of a pain for language learners, but that was not its intended purpose. All in all, it's worth the trouble, because Quebec is North America's lost undiscovered country. [It's strange that due to NAFTA even Mexican products sold primarily in Mexico often have French translations on their boxes]

    One last tip, don't hide sensitive materials from BC in your car at the same height of a dog's nose. Hollow door handles, tail lights, door panels, ect... Bad idea. Best leave Canadian pleasures behind, after all, America is best handled in typical American style: drunk.

  254. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    While I do want those things, they aren't "rights". Governement services are not rights. A right is an innate attribute of the person. It is not something that is granted by government.

    A good example is free speech. Consider a nation that doesn't have laws protecting or recognizing free speech. Do the citizens of that nation have the right to free speech? If yes, then it can't be something provided by government, because in their case it hasn't been.

    Of course, just because healthcare is not a right does not imply any particular means of funding or provision. Not everything the government provides is a right.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  255. Canada has something to offer everybody! by coldtone · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a vast and diverse country, however before moving to Canada you should pick the province that best suits your personality.

    East Coast (Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, PEI )
    Do you like to Drink? Do you prefer to work summers and take winter off? Don't mind if the women aren't very attractive? The east coast is for you!

    Québec

    Are you looking for a place that's like Europe, but with half the class? Then say Bonjour to Québec!

    Ontario

    Do you miss Clinton? Are you gay? Like working for the government? Are you the smartest person you know? Then the logical choice is Ontario.

    Manitoba

    Like hating where you live? Being unemployed? Do you enjoy being eaten alive by mosquitoes in the summer and frozen solid in the winter? Then man its time to go to Manitoba.

    Saskatchewan

    Can't read? Sick of all the trees and hills messing up your views? Then welcome to the flatlands.

    Alberta

    Are you a redneck? Sick of being surrounded by hippies all the time. Want to support a winning hockey team? Then Alberta's the ticket cowboy.

    British Columbia

    Are you high? Do you want to be? Then dude! Hit the west coast man!

  256. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
    Medical bills are also the largest cause of bankruptcy in the US.

    But, to be fair, a whopping 2% of Canadians think the US has a better health care system (reference, 2/3 down). Over half a million people can't all be wrong!

  257. My subjective biased opinion by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in Michigan so I meet quite a number of ex-Candadian who left and will never go back. Mostly because of the healthcare system. Sure it's free, but the problem is that you're always on waiting lists for even simple procedures. Some people die waiting for treatment. Also, they complain about the very high taxes.

    But like my title says, my opinion is biased because I only hear from those who left Canada, not from those who love it and choose to stay.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  258. Canada. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, moving to canada eh? First off soon as you get over the border you can expect to make 10,000 less than what you made in the us. Dollar for Dollar. But remember a cad is only .7 usd... So really you're losing 28% + 10k+28% of 10K... Net result... A systems admin makes like 40k cad on avg. Approx 28 usd. You will pay approximately 25% tax on that amount (not including gst, gas tax (yes gas is 1.00 a litre here now), etc) so 21k USD. Now rent is about 1000 cad a month... 750 usd lets say for the sake of argument. 9000 USD/yr...

    so now from your 21k - 9k... you have 12k to live on.

    Almost all prices in canada dollar for dollar are about the same as the us + 15% (not equiv to the exchange dont ask me why)

    So before coming up here ask yourself can you live on 12k a year. (a decent car still costs 30something)

    Just as a note I live in canada, but I work telecommuted in the US.

    One other lil canadian fact. Employers are so out of touch with what their jobs need and have so much skilled labour that you need a masters degree and five years experience to make 40k. Pretty dumb eh.

    I dont know any 'well-off' IT industry workers who work within canada. Anyone living particularily well seems to contract out to the us or work directly for a company that does.

    Its the big reason why you wont see sites like amazon.ca selling the same materials as amazon.com does. ... And the beauracracy... Man dont try to be a home depot in kitsilano... 22 million for a smallass peice of property and the soccer moms block your business.

    Even with the us economic climate what it is... Stay there, you're really better off.

    Only reason to come to canada is for the scenery and people. More appropriate as a vacation destination.

    A canadian-us outsourcer

  259. Add up your taxes.... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Add up all your taxes, income, GST (or whatever it is called), property, vehicle etc. Bet they come up to 50% or more.

  260. Pay Sucks by salmonz · · Score: 1

    USA Pay: $100,000 USD
    Canada: $50,000 CAD

    Same job.

    1. Re:Pay Sucks by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      Before or after deductions? ;)

  261. Depends on where you go in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the East-West differences in North America are more pronounced than the North-South.

    For example going between California and British Columbia can be pretty comfortable. Yet going from California to Texas can be pretty shocking.

  262. $1.50cnd Tim Hortons or $3au Flat White, I'm torn. by chathamhouse · · Score: 1

    My major torment in Melbourne is not being able to get a consistently fantastic cup of drip coffee.

    An extra large cup of the fresh stuff used to cost me $1.50 cnd, for half a liter of caffeinated goodness.

    Now, a 'large' (250ml) flat white or long black sets me back $3.00au. ($1cnd ~= $1au at the moment).

    The only Drip coffee alternative is Starbucks, which doesn't bother with non-espresso based coffees until 10am. The horror.

    Back to the topic at hand, in reasons to re-locate:
    America: 2 weeks vacation if you're lucky. Low tax.
    Canada: 3 weeks vacation rather standard. Higher tax.
    Australia: 4 weeks vacation guaranteed. Tax higher than CND, but on it's way to dropping to equivalent rates.

    But hey, I could care less about taxes. Give me education and healthcare that works, cities that are clean, an approach with firearms that doesn't make ownership a right, and I'll happily shell out between 30-40%.

  263. Re:Don't Get Sick by descil · · Score: 1

    Hey, stop the google-hate!

  264. Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by benzapp · · Score: 4, Funny

    A beautiful blonde female of French decent would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

    In Montreal, it will run you $150.

    That is the real bargain.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
    1. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny
      A beautiful blonde female of French decent would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

      In Montreal, it will run you $150.

      cool! lessee... $150 per hour... so the cost to a typical slashdotter would be $1.86!

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    2. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Reziac · · Score: 1
      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by bware · · Score: 1

      A beautiful blonde female of French decent would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

      In Montreal, it will run you $150.

      That is the real bargain.


      That's just the exchange rate working for you.

    4. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A beautiful blonde female of French decent would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

      In Montreal, it will run you $150


      But if you're in New York you can take a plane to Montreal, spend an hour (personally I find half an hour is enough) with her, then return to NY, all for less than $500. Plus you avoid the risk of involvement with "law enforcement", because in NY I think this harmless activity is called "prostitution" and is illegal.

    5. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " A beautiful blonde female of French decent [sic] would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

      In Montreal, it will run you $150."

      Yeah, but the $850 you save will be needed to pay for an interpreter - if you are a Brit with a French degree like me you'll know what I mean.

      Quebecers/French Canadians generally have an IMPENETRABLE accent... comes from being abandoned by the French c.200 years ago.

      If you don't believe me, and you speak French, visit Montreal and chat with some of the people there.

      Rob

    6. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Kombat · · Score: 1

      A beautiful blonde female of French decent would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

      In Montreal, it will run you $150.


      Not to mention, prostitution is legal in Canada.

      "Solicitation" isn't, but paying for sex is legal in Canada. That's why the "Escorts" section of the yellow pages is so thick. As long as the deal isn't discussed in public, paying for sex is legal in Canada.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    7. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      Hm. It might be because you're a Brit. Though I don't have a degree, I can get by in French and I find it much easier to understand French Canadians than French natives, especially Parisians.

      I find they more or less speak French with a North American accent and tend to use more local words for things, which is frowned upon in France.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
    8. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by sharkey · · Score: 1
      A beautiful blonde female of French decent would cost you $1000 per hour in New York.

      Ummm, if she's for sale, doesn't that mean that she's NOT decent?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking? I think you haven't grasped the concept of Prostitution.

    10. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man... your site is really frightening... Do you have customers? I mean, besides the usual fashion or special fx houses...

    11. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by legality · · Score: 0

      Ah but you forgot the currency exchange! $150 Canadian is only $107 US!

      Life just keeps getting better and better.

    12. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not only legal, but the age of consent is 14!!! (As long as you aren't a teacher!!)

    13. Re:Prostitutes are also incredibly inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can even take pictures of the 14 year old while you are at it! Carry it in your wallet, tell the guys at work. Just don't distribute it to anyone... Man, if I ever have a daughter I'm just locking her up and never letting her go outside.

  265. Same crap ... in Canadian $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    overall you'll learn to apprecaiate being overtaxed, overworked, and underpaid ....

  266. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    St-Catherine doesn't run through Old Montreal, it's further south a bit beyond Rene-Levesque

  267. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I live in Quebec...

    First, your french is really bad and I wasn't able to read the sentence as fast as the one before it. I'm not sure I understand what you meant. ;)

    As for the situation of people speaking only english, well, it depends where you live. In Montreal, it won't be a problem at all. In fact, it's rather english speaking people who are touchy about their language. I don't speak english well, but many times I'm force to speak english because some people refuse to speak french (even if they know enough of the language).

    That being said, the real problem is more a question of racism. Some people here don't really like Americans. If you're the kind of people who like to drive with a small american flag on your car... you'd better have a private parking place. On the other end, if you keep a low profile and try to learn some word of french, everything will be all right.

  268. Corporate Canada by EEGeek · · Score: 1

    Hello, eh.

    I am Canadian and I'm going to tell you what corporate Canada is all aboot eh. We have this cool day called Jean Cretien day, in which we celebrate our last Prime Minister, Jean. We all have lots of donuts that day and talk about hockey, but the catch is, its in French. Another thing to be aware of is that we have Naked Fridays at all companies. Its not only a good idea, but its the law. You have to freeze your bacon off in your coporate igloo though. Anyhow, thats corporate Canada for you. Hope you like it.

    PS I really am Canadian, eh.

  269. Corporate Work in the US vs. Canada by Joe_Canuck · · Score: 1

    Cliff, Sysadmin jobs are few and far between these days, but things are improving here in Toronto. There was a 3 year drought here, but new positions are gradually beginning to open in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) - I still have colleagues in Calgary, Ottawa and Montréal; things are horrendous in terms of new position openings.... Workopolis would be the place to go for signs of recovery fyi. Cheers

  270. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by HyperCash · · Score: 1

    "Do, however, spend a few months watching DVDs with the language track set to French beforehand."

    This is offtopic, but what the hell. Does anybody else find it totaly retarded that even if you live someplace like CA where there are millions (tens of millions?) of spanish speakers and maybe, say, four or five french speakers that most of the DVDs come with French language tracks and not spanish ones? WTF!

    --HC

    --
    So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
  271. Quebec would be the best place to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not only is quebec hard to live in because of all the quebec-frensh issue, the entire city of montreal is getting more and more popular with terrorists. they act like they rule the city. they harass the women, and rude. in my opinion, they're worse than the qubequeers. now imagine having to work with them. no, i'm not lying. look at concordia - which is now officially called "terrorist traning school" - at what happened couple of septembers ago when they tried destroying the school just because netanyahu wanted to make a speech.
    You are an uninformed moron. There are a lot of Arabs in Montréal but they're just a small group. You'll find more in Toronto or Ottawa. Concordia is an english university. Montréal is still a great city to live in. The 58% tax bracket is actually bullshit. If you have a family you get a lot of the taxes back. Rent is much cheaper than in bloke canada. Ontario is boring as hell. For a good time you have to go to Montréal, Boston or New York. Montréal is just as fun as New York City with a lower crime rate. You will always find good food in the non english parts of Montréal. You are likely to get food poisioning more often than you'd care for in Ontario. Anglo Canadian have no clue about what is good food. I've had the runs eating in Toronto restaurants more than anywhere else in North America. Your only issue in Québec would be the language of education but then again your kids would be perfectly bilingual. I was raised in French in Québec and by age 18 I was perfectly bilingual.
    1. Re:Quebec would be the best place to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anglo Canadian have no clue about what is good food...
      ...I was raised in French in Québec and by age 18 I was perfectly bilingual.


      Yeah, uh... you just keep on working on your English there, good buddy.

    2. Re:Quebec would be the best place to go by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      you know, your statements combined with your attitude remind me simultaneously of 2 different things:

      1) Robin Williams comedy routine where he imitates the French {French accent}."We're French,you pissant fucking Americains! Fuck off!"

      and

      2) the scene from The Matrix Reloaded where they are trying to get the keymaker in the restaurant and the Merovingian says "I love the French language. I have sampled every language, French is my favorite. Fantastic language. Especially to curse with. Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d'enculé de ta mère. It's like wiping your arse with silk. I love it."

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    3. Re:Quebec would be the best place to go by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Hey, I saw that just last night. And since my GF (who does speak French) was asleep I did not undertand it. Translate please?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    4. Re:Quebec would be the best place to go by rik184 · · Score: 1

      Thta particular curse is french (from France) and not from Quebec french language. It's like applying an english curse (from the british) is applicable to New-York.

    5. Re:Quebec would be the best place to go by Etyenne · · Score: 1
      Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d'enculé de ta mère.

      Literal: God's name whore brothel shit fucked idiot bumfucked of your mother. It does'nt make sense in French either by the way, in case you wonder.

      --
      :wq
  272. Re:Socialist Country.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh and don't forget the French, those whacky French speaking Canadians make the real French seem practically friendly.

    And yes I did actually work in Canada for 6 months made me glad to come back to my job in the states.


    Glad you did buddy.

  273. I'm Tired of All The Cold Jokes! by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

    There are clearly not a whole lot of posters here from Vancouver. It's the best part of Canada, and we get snow like one week a year. It's beauty warm now and has been for some weeks, and will be till mid October!

  274. Québec has good beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Québec has good beer like
    "La maudite"
    "La fin du monde"
    "L'eau bénite"

  275. Peameal and Backbacon are not the same by msobkow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Peameal bacon is rolled in corn meal and tends to be somewhat saltier. The corn meal rim gets crisped when the rim of fat fries, adding a texture component to the flavour.

    Backbacon is usually less salty, sometimes more smokey, and has no corn meal.

    Both are made using pork tenderloin, so they're very low fat, more like a mini ham steak than greasy side-pork bacon.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  276. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    No. But as a society, we feel that everyone who lives in our society deserves equal access to healthcare, and that those of us who can pay will pay.
    We decided tp collectively pitch in and make sure everyone has equal treatment by the healthcare system.

    Just like we decided everyone gets to use the roads and walk the streets, even though some people are "Freeloaders" who do not pay to maintain them.

    Just like the local footbridge across the river.. even those from out of town or those with no jobs still get to use it, even though it was the property owner's of the city who's property taxes paid for that bridge and it's maintenance.

    Nobody said this was a "natural right". It is a right we decided to grant each other.

  277. Canadian Bacon by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Officially "Canadian" bacon is backbacon, but the truth is you may get either served depending on where you are. Foreigners who ask for Canadian bacon don't know the difference between peameal and backbacon, so they get whichever pork-tenderloin bacon the restaurant usually serves.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  278. Re:Yes, but significantly less ... (even more OT) by kiatoa · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they aren't armed here (Vermont) since they outnumber us humans two to one. I was just out with my crossbow (cheapy $90 120lb) but didn't get a good shot. I got a couple of huge ones last summer. We are loosing trees and our road is at risk of being washed away if the dam breaks. Called the game warden last year to ask what we could do, his answer: "Shoot 'em!". I love the contrast: shooting at nuisance wildlife at 5:30am and designing digital circuitry by 8:30am... I bet it is even better in parts of Canada in that regard.

    --
    90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
  279. firearm ownership by bladesjester · · Score: 1

    what's wrong with making firearm ownership a right?

    one of my favorite quotes on the topic (because it is true all too often. think of china where the communist government went so far as to outlaw kung fu. and i'm sorry, but wushu does not compare, honestly.) - "am armed person is a citizen, and unarmed one is a subject"

    --
    Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    1. Re:firearm ownership by HalfFlat · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with making firearm ownership a right?
      Because it seems to have very negative consequences.

      The US seems quite similar to many Western countries in culture: similar degrees of exposure to violence, even (with a bit of a stretch) similar levels of religious fervour. But the US has a terrifyingly high level of gun-related deaths.

      The big difference is the degree of gun ownership. There is a correlation. Is it meaningful? Many will argue it is, and personally speaking, these arguments are convincing.

      If you have an idealised model, but which in practice isn't working out, then it needs to be tweaked. A right to gun ownership, acting as a check on government abuse, seems to be a case like this. It doesn't seem to prevent or stop the abuse, and the resulting widespread availability of guns is killing and maiming thousands upon thousands of people every year (I believe on the order of 15000 non-suicide deaths, and over 50000 injuries).

      If a theory isn't working out in practice, then it's time for a new theory.

    2. Re:firearm ownership by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      you'll find that a lot of the incidents with guns as far as death and injury go are against people who feel that it should not be up to them to defend themselves.

      take away gun ownership rights. it won't stop the kid who is already using an illegal gun (not registered, etc) from getting an illegal gun. it will just stop the people that play by the rules from having one to defend themselves with.

      a lot of it really does come down to people becomming more and more passive (and thinking that passive means not doing *anything* violent instead of only using violence when necessary). personally, i am a rather passive and laid back person, that does not mean, however, that i will let someone try to do me harm or do harm to other people, and i am quite well trained to deal with such situations.

      and even if a gun is not available, there are weapons all around you. knives, pipes, tree branches, car antennas. don't think that someone who wants to do you harm won't pick up one and use it on you.

      i'm not saying any of this in a harsh tone, just being honest.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    3. Re:firearm ownership by chathamhouse · · Score: 1

      Imagine being somewhere where there'd be no want to make firearm ownership a right.

      That's where the arguments for ownership fall appart.

      That's where the worst thing the media can report on is a bunch of kids attacking one another with knives and fists, never really being a problem to the bystander 100m across the park.

      That place is anywhere where there is no right and hence no supply to meet the demands of irrationality. You would make a fine candidate for working anywhere, save a warzone.

      An armed citizen can lose his or her cool and do everlasting damage. An unarmed one can have everlasting impact.

    4. Re:firearm ownership by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      there will never be zero demand for weapons, firearm or otherwise. even if your "average" citizen had no desire for them, the people who still want to do them harm would desire weapons. the worst that could happen is a lot more than knives and fists. there were a *lot* of ranged weapons around long before the gun and rudimentary guns are not that difficult to fabricate. man is a social creature, but he is also a predator. predatory nature is always going to be expressed in some way, some cases more violently than others (everything from competition in basketball and other sports, to hunting, to violence against each other). we are, at our core, animals, and have the same needs and desires, really. as far as everlasting damage goes, it would not be nearly as common as you seem to think it would. the saying "an armed society is a polite society" is rather true. you tend to be much less prone to violent outbreaks without good reason when you know that your actions can bring immidiate and heavy consequences. your views have been colored by a very long campaign that says violence is bad and anyone who knows how to be violent is bad. unfortunately, a lot of people have. it's the product of a rather one-sided ideology (and, unfortunately, ideologies are often one sided). to put all of this in perspective, i'm not just spouting my idealistic views. there have been several times when my life or the lives of people i care for have been in question because of someone else while i was there. since i'm writing this, i think i'm still here. you can't expect everyone else to be idealistic and nonviolent. you can only be the best person you can be and still be prepared for other people to be both the best, and worst, that they can be. like i said, i tend to be very non-violent and laid back, but i am prepared to be direct and brutal if need be. utopia got its name because it could not exist. guns are just a tool, like a screwdriver or a hammer. they can all be used for constructive ends or they can be used to do harm. it all depends on the person using them, but just because bad people have used them in the past is no reason to say that the tool itself is bad and nobody should have it. that mentality only works on the people who play by the rules, and the people who do harm with those tools do not play by the rules. the only thing becomming a sheep ever did was help feed the wolves.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    5. Re:firearm ownership by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      sorry about the readability. i missed chaging the formatting. it's been a little crazy this morning

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  280. Re:Socialist Country.... by maddskillz · · Score: 1

    I will say it's still a pain in the ass, even if you own your own company. I think if the rules were straight forward, it might not be so bad, but nothing is straighforward!

  281. Are you sure the problem... by Satan's+Librarian · · Score: 1
    ... is US corporate culture and not Insurance Company culture?

    One of the least pleasant places I've worked was a large insurance company (my first job - internal pc tech). I think it has something to do with the fact that any customers anyone actually has to deal with are immediately presumed to be criminals for making a claim at all combined with the fact that really there just isn't much that's fun about insurance.

    Find something more fun. If you have other interests, try to find a company that does things that align with those. *Then* worry about what country its in, unless you're just fed up with living in the US in general. Don't go work for an insurance company in Canada and expect it to be magically 'fun', although traveling internationally and living abroad can be worth doing by itself.

  282. Re:Don't Get Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hockey tape???

    A true Canuckistonian would know that everything is fixed by duct tape.

  283. Canada and Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're an American who's lived for a couple of years in Australia, Canada is not too dissimilar.

    Where Australia is mostly hot, Canada is mostly cold. But both have as much variety as the US. Canadians drive on the same side of the road as Americans, and are possibly the only people in the world who have found a use for the huge-ass 4WD cruise liners that the US churns out.

    The similarities to Australia lie mostly in the culture. The people in both countries tend to be laid-back and secure, quieter than Americans, and more at peace with the world and each other. In both countries, you're less likely to be shot, attacked, segregated, shouted at, sued, advertised to by really excreble advertising every ten seconds, phoned by telemarketers, asked to join a cult or religion, or have politicians who start wars.

    On the minus side, you will have politicians who join in others' wars.

    Stability is a big plus in both Canada and Australia. People are less likely to fly off the handle over minor issues. People are more likely to tell advertisers and salespeople to shrivel and die, as they're quite capable of making purchasing decisions all by themselves.

  284. going to Canada not that good as you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadians got this mentality: If we can't make it better than the US so let's make it look complicated through burocracy.

    Housing prices are outrageous, what you pay for a house in toronto is worth a ranch outside of austin if your standards are high.

    Costumer service is inexistent, I've have to taken away my business from a lot of places and they don't care, the only company that keeps that is walmart, a lot of people hate it in Canada but there is still another big group that love it.

    Discrimination is rampant from all points of views .

    A LOT of people don't even have full time jobs and that is putting poverty in Canada in the spot light.

    No guns?, there are shooting ranges everywhere in Canada, the no guns image is a mirage, the raising of illegal guns in the streets is a reality and police forces won't be able to containt it.

    Wheather is just as misarable as Canadians.

    Another LOT of people are ALCHOHOLICS, people drive drunk and police doesn't even care, maybe because goverment know they do a so lousy job that is the only way to keep people busy with their miseries.

    What about the seniors, those bitter asses who think own everything just because the are part of the goverment, Canada thinks first on their seniors than families, did you see the South Parl episode on the seniors... well that's canada, seniors killing people while they drive and free they go.

    Politics laugh at people and all people do is grim and walk away. 15 years of ditactorship are proof of that.

    During the G-8 meeting there always have been a lot of rockus but in Cowgary it was just a sheep parade, even french canadians have more cojones than the rest of the country altogether, maybe canada is the petri dish of how people should be in the future lame asses with no brains with the false sense of inteligence they read a lot of books they don't know what are about just to shell themselves from dealing with other human beings and be more human nad caring and not the ice blocks they are.

    Americans who come to Canada are hiding from creditors and say otherwise, of course those americans aren't worth a s*** and should stay out of america and be part of the third world mentality of the canadians.

    Frauds are commited left and right and the goverment do nothing to protect those affected, maybe that's the reason a lot of people love Canada.

    Don't be fooled for those here who say that love canada and everything is better/fine than the US, those are mermaid songs luring you to a miserable life.

  285. Academia by SurgeryByNumbers · · Score: 1

    Could anyone answer the same question, but for academic life? What do prospects look like for research-based jobs? I hear the University of Toronto has a pretty good CSC program.

  286. offtopic, but... by hysma · · Score: 1

    Microwave oven you mean... according to two friends of mine who work at Tim Hortons.

    Since they "standardized" everything to come from their central factory, all the local outlets have to do is zap them in the microwave to get rid of the ice and they're good to go.

    "Microwave" Oven Fresh, just as the sign says!

  287. Gods are for the morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gods are for the fundies from the midle east and the
    fundies from the west.

    The christians fundamentalists like Fallwell,
    Robertson and Bush dream of rapture day.
    A life in heaven with Jesus if they kill
    or convert many non believers.

    The muslims fundamentalists dream of their 72
    virgins. A life in heaven with Allah if they
    kill or convert many non believers.

  288. Lethargic atmosphere by tentimestwenty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As has been pointed out in other posts, Canadian companies and work environments tend to be on the low end of the competitiveness scale. The preferred mindset seems to be "keep things steady and we will all have jobs for a long time." For most companies this works fine but it doesn't create a very challenging or interesting workplace. The government is the extreme example of this. If creativity or advancement are on your agenda you will probably be disappointed. Canada has far fewer start-up type companies because the markets are small and widely spaced. There just isn't the opportunity or the infrastructure to support many really dynamic companies.

  289. shut the border ! 1st of the draft dodgers eh ! by mattlamb · · Score: 1

    most of us are foreigners up here and I guess a few more enlightend souls is always welcome..

    --
    { Pillar candles great for when the power fails and you cant see the keyboard..
  290. Uhhh... by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

    YANKEE GO HOME!

  291. Canada is a foreign country by radtea · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a Canadian. I've lived on the West Coast, in Winnipeg, and in Eastern Ontario. I also spent a year in the U.S., living in L.A. (Pasadena), and have been close to several Americans over the past 15 years.

    I've worked in the public sector (universities and health care as a medical physicist) and in the private sector (largish public software company, several smaller private firms.) I now own my own company (http://www.predictivepatterns.com).

    In one of my previous positions the company was run by Americans but staffed by Canadians, and it made me acutely aware of the cultural differences between the two countries. The Americans wanted cheer and ethusiasm. The Canadians weren't having any. They produced solid results, but they just couldn't be all happy and excited about it, and they found the Americans' attitudes extremely wearing. The Canadians' attitudes drove the Americans nuts.

    So an American coming to Canada shouldn't be fooled by the fact that most of us speak something like the same language and have some other similarities. Canadians are different. We are more small-c conservative and more small-l liberal. We are stupid and wasteful in less obvious ways than Americans. We own lots and lots of guns but hardly ever shoot anyone with them.

    Our national govenment is the only one in the G8 that has its fiscal house properly in order--we have run a surplus for long enough that I can't remember offhand the last time we had a deficit (sometime in the mid-90's) and we are steadly paying down our national debt. Most provincial governments are in less good shape, but still take fiscal probity seriously.

    As a business-person, I love it here. You can incorporate nationally on-line for a total of $220. The federal government is a world-leader in supplying services electronically. Labour laws are a lot tighter here than in the U.S., but the work-force is generally well-educated and even unions are a lot more reasonable than they were 20 years ago. Taxes are somewhat higher, but this is largely compensated for by not having to pay for private health insurance.

    The per-capita cost of health care is significantly lower in Canada than the US. We have a three-tier health care system, in which basic service is paid for via taxes, small levels of enhanced service are available for relatively small fees, and the very rich have U.S. hospitals ready to serve them right across the border.

    The basic level of care for a wide range of things is as good or better as the U.S. average, but it's widely recognized that the basic health-care system is increasingly broken. If how we dealt with the federal deficit is any indication, there will be a decade of sometimes quite nasty debate that will end in a fairly broad concensus on what to do, and we'll do it.

    Americans sometimes see that we are polite, and think us weak. They see that we are calm, and think us passive. They see that we are content, and think us stupid. They are wrong on all counts.

    --Tom

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    1. Re:Canada is a foreign country by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that Canadians watched hockey like Americans watch "reality" tv shows, and drank beer... but, hey, I could be wrong :) I was just curious on the gun laws in Canada. Seems wonderful that lots of people have them... seems safe. I'd rather be in a crowd of 1000 armed, legal gun owners, than in a crowd of 995 unarmed people, and 5 armed thugs.

  292. oh yes they can by Psymunn · · Score: 1

    umm... the thing about Canadian health care and unions is it's great in theory
    but between paying for everyone to send their kid with a cold to emergency, lack of nurses (apparantly US pays them more) and unions always stricking, health care isn't the canadian trump card it used to be

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  293. Re:Socialist Country.... by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

    And the US is a democratic republic, but it's capitalist too. You can be Socialist and Democratic, or you can be Capitalistic and a Dictatorship (though not very well). Political systems are different than economic, genius.

  294. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    I'm not arguing over the merits of tax funded healthcare. Only over the definition of "right". You broaden that too much and you suddenly end up with a bunch of people demanding their "rights" to all sorts of spurious things, like broadband access, banks that stay open later, and three-items-or-less lanes at the grocers.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  295. Work in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you like the idea of the same corporate 9-5, often with lots of unpaid OT. The same Corporate pointy haired uninformed miscreants which is typical of the normal IT Project / Dept. Manager

    All that, plus half the income and more than twice the taxes.. massive deductions for things you will likely never be able to reclaim (CPP, EI), then for good measure add another 15% on top of any services or goods you buy while there.

    Good healthcare mind you. More open space. Completely comical Political scene.

    We have excellent beaver, make great poutine, can drink and be merry. say "eh" and "out and about" a lot.

    Draw your own conclusions.

  296. Actually Canada already had a "War on Terror" by bingbong · · Score: 1

    During the October Crisis in 1970 in Canada the FLQ (Front de Libération du Québec) ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLQ ) terrorist group kidnapped two public officials in Quebec ( http://www.bonjourquebec.com/anglais/ ) and murdered one, and Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau ( http://www.clevernet.on.ca/pierre_trudeau/ ) invoked the War Measures Act ( http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/War-Measu res-Act )suspending civil liberties.

    In fact, the Canadian Goverment ( http://canada.gc.ca/ ) was worried that the FLQ wanted to steal nuclear weapons ( http://tinyurl.com/3ysev ). So the whole WMD and terrorism thing predates Mr Bush by 30 odd years... And the Canadian "War on Terror" is well over....

    --
    "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
    1. Re:Actually Canada already had a "War on Terror" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tinyurl that actually went somewhere legitimate!

      You have my respect sir.

  297. -1 offtopic, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god don't people hate the truth? point out the obvious, that daddy bush was covering his enron-deep ass by getting his old cia buddies to arrange 9/11, and you get modded down to -1; but if you lie your ass off and say that clinton was a fucker and all dirty sand nigger a-rabs should be killed then you get a +5,000,000 informative/insigthful/cocksucker...but never offtopic...

  298. My favorite Canadian joke by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 2, Funny
    SubtleNuance wrote:
    > Canada *dosnt have* an "inferitority complex" as
    > much as USAians are incapable of seeing us
    > WITHOUT *their* Superiority Complex -- get it?
    > The USAians are projecting... and it speaks more
    > to your hubris than our opinion of the world --
    > get it?

    The silly comment quoted above reminds me of my favorite Canadian joke:

    Canadian to American: "Tell me, what do Americans *really* think of Canada?"
    American to Canadian: "We don't."
    1. Re:My favorite Canadian joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fav....

      This is the transcript of the actual radio conversation of a US Naval ship with the Canadian authorities off the coast of Newfoundland in Oct 1995.

      Radio conversation released by chief of naval operations 10/10/95.

      Canadians: Please divert your course 15 degrees to the south to avoid a collision.

      Americans: Recommend you divert your course 15 degrees to the north.

      Canadians: Negative. you will have to divert your course 15 degrees to the south to avoid a collision.

      Americans: This is the captain of a US navy ship. I say again, divert your course.

      Canadians: No. I say again, divert your course.

      Americans: This is the aircraft carrier USS Lincoln. the second biggest ship in the United States Atlantic fleet. We are accompanied by three destroyers, three cruisers and numerous support vessels. I demand that you change your course 15 degrees north, that's one five degrees north, or counter measures will be undertaken to ensure the safety of this ship.

      Canadians: We are a lighthouse. Your call.

    2. Re:My favorite Canadian joke by Ulven · · Score: 1

      Go and look at Snopes.

    3. Re:My favorite Canadian joke by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      That was funny, but as another poster pointed out, it looks like it isn't true...

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  299. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch DVD's with the French language track?
    Are you insane? Those movies are in proper French - dubbed by actors in France for the international version, they are not dubbed in Quebec French (the languages have evolved entirely differently in the last near 500 years). Its like telling a German that they can begin to pickup British English by watching American DVD's.
    Its the worst thing you can do, you learn the language but sound like a moron!

  300. One more thing.... by HappyHour · · Score: 0

    How's the herb in Canada?

  301. Re:Get Sick all you want, and you won't go bankrup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That article that you keep posting refers to government spending on health care. The parent suggested going to a private doctor and paying cash. You will get better treatment that way. There are a lot of small doctor offices opening up in the US that don't even accept any sort of insurance. I'd much rather pay $100 out of my own pocket for a checkup with a private doctor than pay a $10 copay to see a doctor that sees 50 patients a day just to get the money from insurance companies.

  302. Weather and SIN numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm a Canadian and must point out that the weather will affect you win ways you never considered. Depending on how far north were talking about. Southern Ontario is like the northern states but go to the weather network website and look at the average yearly weather patterns of the cities you're considering and decide if you want to hack those conditions. Considered BC because they kinda get the best of both the summer and winter world.

    Also make sure that you're going to meet the requirements for getting a SIN number that will let you work. (Not easy with the level of Asian competition from main land Chain these days. (Seem stupid that we don't let Americans and Canadian move freely within North America. It's not like ether sides is going to rush over the boarder)

  303. Study is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Various statistics - including the Canadian government's web site - note that there about 3.3 times as many guns per person in the US as in Canada.

    Do some research if you don't believe it - you'll find it's true. Regardless of your opinion, the fact remains that Americans have a much higher rate of gun ownership.

  304. Getting treatment = working system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Is that why the Ontario government and Princess Margaret Hospital
    > sent more than a thousand backlogged cancer patients to Roswell Park in
    > Buffalo - because of how well the Canadian system works?

    Yes, actually - because of how well the Canadian system works THESE PEOPLE ARE GETTING TREATMENT!

    Contrast that to the 44 MILLION Americans who have no health insurance right now. Contrast the two scenarios:

    Canadian: "I'm sorry, we don't have room in this hospital, so we'll have to treat you at this other hospital."

    American: "No health insurance? Too bad you've got cancer, here's a sample pack of Advil. Next!"

    So long as the patient gets treatment, what does the precise location of the hospital matter?

  305. Work in U.S., live in Canada by spago · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Windsor, ON and work in Dearborn, MI (a suburb of Detroit). My round trip commute is 54km/34mi or about an hour per day. I've had the opportunity to work in both countries, and I've noticed a few differences:

    - There is definitely more career opportunity in the U.S. It also seems easier to shine (not just *my* opinion), probably because with such a vast economy, there is plenty of opportunity to hire some real duds. :)

    - You'll almost definitely make more money in the U.S. I enjoy the best of both worlds, paid in U.S. dollars, yet live in lower-cost Canada. Taxes are higher in Canada, but housing, utilities and food is somewhat lower.

    - U.S. medical coverage is wonderful, as long as you have insurance. The Canadian system is actually quite good, except for certain types of procedures where there are unacceptably long waits. (I love having medical coverage in both countries.) Yes you pay for the Canadian system in terms of taxes, but don't lose sight of all the co-pays and hidden fees that come with most U.S. insurance programs. A coworker of mine recently had an extended stay in a U.S. hospital, and all those little fees added up to over $1000 USD.

    - Culturally, I notice a few small differences in general, but most of the people I work with in the U.S. are wonderful, equally nice as the folks I've worked with in Canada. Canadians in general seem to be a bit more polite (seems hard to get a "you're welcome" out of many Americans), and Americans are definitely more confident and aggressive (which probabaly explains their business success). But most of the stereotypes mentioned here are just wrong in my opinion.

    Work in Canada or the U.S.? It's really a matter of personal taste. You can't lose, as long as you work hard and find a nice place to work, I think you'll live very comfortably in either country.

    By the way - those who said it's difficult to work in Canada are wrong. Computer folks under NAFTA have plenty of ways to obtain employment in either country.

    -Steve-

    1. Re:Work in U.S., live in Canada by a24061 · · Score: 1
      I live in Windsor, ON and work in Dearborn, MI (a suburb of Detroit).

      Do you have problems with dual income taxation?

    2. Re:Work in U.S., live in Canada by mcdade · · Score: 1

      I too live in Windsor, but choose to work here (after having permit problems). And I'm glad that I work in Canada.. granted I'm sure I don't get paid as much as I would in the US, but then again i get to work at 8:30 leave at 4:30.. rarely stay late, unless i'm putting in time to have some flex hours, so I can leave early or miss work for something. I have noticed in my area a high number of US workers living in canada, MI plates on cars that are parked outside houses all the time. I'm guessing that if they work downtown Detroit, it's nicer to have a 15 min tunnel commute then a 40min freeway commute.

      Generally Canadians are more relaxed about work, I find that in the US they take their job way to seriously, everything is about who you are and how much you make, and making sure you hit that next sales quota..

      My girlfriend is american, and here are some of the things I have noticed.. that the differences in poor areas vs wealthy area in the US is huge (the word ghetto comes to mind) where as in canada that divide isn't as large. Roads suck in the US, I would happily pay more gas tax so my car won't be demo'ed after 4 yrs of driving around, also seems to be a high number of people that never fix their cars after they get into an accident (not sure if this is a detroit/chicago thing or all of the US). Food is so much better in canada, the supermarket is cheaper (we aren't taxed on basic food items) and restaurants have better, cheaper food, and better service. For Windsor being so small, it has more and better restaurants then Detroit... actually lots of americans come here to eat. Everything looks nicer, we (as a country) generally try and keep thinks looking good, from streets to parks.. there is less trash.

      As for working, all i can say is 2 weeks vacation min. I once applied for a job in the US and they were only offering 1 week vacation (which i guess is the min)... however i want to move to europe where 3 to 4 weeks can be standard.. Work one place long enough and you will get 3 or 4 weeks..

      that's about all i can think of right now.

    3. Re:Work in U.S., live in Canada by generalbeard · · Score: 1

      Try living in Newfoundland and then getting someone to substitute bacon for bologna.... ewww.

      get em by', get em.

  306. Lazy and not using their brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently living and working in Canada - I immigrated from the Netherlands.
    My experience is that Canadians
    - do not want to use their brains,
    - are hypocrites (form over substance),
    - and are lazy.

    1. Re:Lazy and not using their brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please go back then. We don't want you here.

      We like the way we live, and we keep our noses out of other peoples' business. Apparently the same can't be said for you.

    2. Re:Lazy and not using their brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad for you - your government just gave me citizenship. I'm going to enjoy your beautiful nature, and if I want to have an intelligent conversation - there are enough fellow immigrants to talk with. Bye!

    3. Re:Lazy and not using their brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. I think of the Netherlands as the paradise of Europe, one of the last bastions of free thought in the world. Why would anyone leave there and go, of all places, to Canada?

    4. Re:Lazy and not using their brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the post. I will try to answer your question. My main point however is that your impression is not true anymore.

      1. Taxes:
      - on earning
      - on spending (multitude of ways e.g. insane gasoline taxes, taxes on cars, even taxes on taxes, and almost 18% GST)
      - on keeping it (yes, you get taxed for what you save)
      - on inheriting
      - on giving it as an inheritance
      - on just being somewhere (property taxes, water system taxes))

      I am a professional accountant and I calculated what was leftover of my salary: 28% net. Now - I don't mind paying taxes as long as I see that something good is being done for it but that was not the case.

      2. Tensions: 10% of the population is already islamic, and Arab kids make up 50% to 75% of births in the four major cities. Project troubles. We already had enough in the last ten years. Example: Arab youth dancing on the streets on 9/11 e.g. And if you say something about it, then you are an utter white racist who needs to be eliminated (this is basically what all white people say - leftovers from politically correct). Other example: in 2003, a vegetarian 'activist' shot the brains out of the first politician who dared to stand up to the feel-good-politicians by saying that maybe it was time to reduce immigration because it was getting a bit crowded. His brains were splattered over the pavement.

      3. Crowdedness: Almost the highest population density in the world: 16 million people (18 mln projected in 2050) on the space of Vancouver Island. Almost 450 people per square km. Try getting to work without 1 hour traffic jams.

      4. Dog shit everywhere. You cannot step into your house after a walk, without checking your shoes. Really - it is normal for people to have their dogs poop on the pavement and not to remove it.

      5. No real nature. Every square foot has been ploughed three times.

      6. Free speech? Mmmm. Try saying that 'it is your personal conviction that gay marriage is wrong'. This guarantees a lawsuit or losing your job. Canada is no different by the way.

      Of course, the Netherlands have a lot of pros, but on the whole, Canada is a better place to live.

  307. Canadian system costs 57% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Sure the system in Canada is in many ways inferior to the US, but it is absolutly free

    No, actually - at least in BC there's a sliding scale based on how much you earned last year, with anyone earning a decent amount (~$25k+ or so) paying the full amount (~$400). Not that not paying would stop you from getting treatment - it'd just get the government hassling you to pay your bills.

    It's worth noting that not only is the Canadian system much less expensive overall (57% of the per-capita spending as the US), it's also pretty much on par with the US's system, at least in the 21 indicators used in a recent international study: http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/05/04/sci-tech/comp are040504

    Yes, Canadian health care isn't perfect, and that imperfection kills people, but apparently it's about as good as much more expensive systems, and it's that good for everyone.

  308. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Bazouel · · Score: 1

    All that bashing about Quebec because of its language ... that simply amazes me.

    Do you realise that almost every non English countries in the world has to learn English, at least the base ? Now, just how self centric are you to not even be willing to learn something new ?

    And by the way, Spanish is usually spoken faster than French. I speak French, English, Spanish, Italian, German and Russian, in that order, so I think I know what I'm talking about here.

    --
    Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
  309. You're dead wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I suppose that you would also contend that the reason the U.S. has
    > better healthcare for a lower cost than anyone else in the world

    You have no idea what you're talking about.

    Healthcare in Canada costs 57% of what it does in the US (CDN$2792 vs. CDN$4887 in 2001) and is quite comparable in quality according to a major recent international study ( http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/05/04/sci-tech/comp are040504).

    AND that's to give full healthcare to everyone, while the US leaves 44 million people uninsured and in danger.

    Please - if you're going to "correct" people, try to have some acquaintance with the facts.

  310. I thought that was 3-4 guns per caliber ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess I must be a wee bit over the average ...

    1. Re:I thought that was 3-4 guns per caliber ... by Dravik · · Score: 1

      Congrats.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  311. Cooperation vs. Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't entirely agree with your assessment. I think you missed an important difference between Canadians and Americans, although you alluded to it in your last point:

    > "As Canadian as possible, under the circumstances."

    Being a Canadian living in the US, the number one difference I feel is that everything is so polarized in America. For example, pro-gun/anti-gun people don't see how they often agree (such as wanting to lower crime and make people safer); instead, I've seen them accuse each other of committing literal _murder_ just by supporting their respective beliefs!

    In Canada, cooperation and compromise are virtues. If you get 90% of what you want and I get 90% of what I want, that's often a better outcome than one of us getting 100% and the other 0%.

    In the US, it always seems like cooperation and especially compromise are seen as signs of weakness. Competition - me above all - seems to be the virtue here.

    Competition is valuable, but is simply not the answer all the time. Game Theory - the Prisoner's Dilemma - trivially shows how unbridled competition can lead to an inferior outcome. But in an adversarial, hyper-competetive culture - like it seems the US is sometimes - screams of "me!" drown out suggestions of "we", and everybody loses.

    That's the biggest difference I've found, and I think it's a pretty big one. Seems small at first, but the ramifications... Honestly, the ramifications are unfolding on the world stage as we speak. And they're not all pretty. You can get away without compromising when you're the world power, but it won't make you well-liked.

    1. Re:Cooperation vs. Competition by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 1

      You can get away without compromising when you're the world power, but it won't make you well-liked.

      Tell me about it! At the rate things are going, France will be the homecoming queen and Russia might not ask us to the prom! We've screwed up the whole season's social calendar! We'd better start buying lots of Hallmark cards PRONTO!

      And Syria, if you're reading this - we're really sorry if we hurt your feelings. Let's get together for ice cream. Our treat.

  312. Re: Improvement? by shking · · Score: 1

    Yup

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  313. West Coast Reputation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Vancouver Island (so far west it's off the continent), and whenever I go to Vancouver (Not quite as west -- About as west as Seattle) I'm struck by how stuffy everything is.

  314. Ladies of the Night by Toddimer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I was in Montreal, several girls asked me if I wanted to get laid eventhough I was with my girlfriend

    I'm not sure what part of the USA you're from, but up here, we call those "Prostitutes". Some of them are pretty open minded, hence, approaching a couple, instead of a single man.

    Maybe these girls liked your friend, and were willing to let you join in for extra ;)

  315. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by zx75 · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess I'll speak for the 'middle' of Canada, being a native Winnipegger. Central Canada for the most part is a wide open, friendly place with a significantly lower cost of living than Vancouver, Toronto or Montreal. Taxes are taxes, and for the most part their national so not much I can say about that. The only hard part is that the weather can be very harsh on the prairies, and its what drives most new immigrants away quickly. If you stick through it though it grows on you.

    Central Canada is for the most part very sunny, and summer highs get up into the mid 30s celcius (I don't know farenheit, but its about low 90s to mid 90s I think). The winter will drop as low as -40 (celcius or farenheit) and down to -50 celcius if you factor in the wind.

    --
    This is not a sig.
  316. a minor point by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    Scandinavians are proud that they have the freedom to enter the property of others.

    The same is true in the US, freedom is the presumption. That is, anything not specifically prohibited is allowed.

    This extends to private property. Unless someone has posted their property 'no trespassing' or told you to leave/don't enter personally, you are free to cross their land without fear.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:a minor point by Dravik · · Score: 1

      This really depends on the state. In Alabama if you go wandering around on somebodys land you run a pretty good risk of being shot. I the presumption is that if you had an innocent reason to be there then you would have walked up to their front door and asked permission to be on the land. If you didn't then the person has every reason to assume the worst and act accordingly untill shown otherwise. Really is some unknown person is wandering around on your land you don't know if they are some rapist. Odds are probably not. But odds are you won't need your seatbelt on the drive to work. Still best to take that action just in case. By the time you know for sure it's to late.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    2. Re:a minor point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure about the States, but in England hikers ("ramblers") are constantly at odds with landowners who can and do prevent access to their land.

      In Finland there is a concept of "everyman's rights" regarding access to nature. In practice this means you can't stop people from hiking or picking berries on your land.

      The rights include

      + The right to move in nature, excluding home yards and areas where plants damage easily from you trespassing
      + Stay temporarily (i.e. in a tent)
      + Pick berries, mushrooms and flowers from above areas
      + Fish using hook, line and sinker
      + Swim and bathe

      You may not
      - Disturb people or their homes
      - Disturb or damage birds' nests or chicks
      - Disturb reindeer or wild animals
      - Cut or collect wood
      - Make an open fire, unless in an emergency
      - Drive a motor vehicle offroad without permission
      - Fish (other methods) or hunt without permission

    3. Re:a minor point by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      The same is true in the US, freedom is the presumption. That is, anything not specifically prohibited is allowed. This extends to private property. Unless someone has posted their property 'no trespassing' or told you to leave/don't enter personally, you are free to cross their land without fear.

      The point being that in the Nordic countries said someone couldn't post a sign or tell you to leave/don't enter as our right to take a path, camp etc is law.

      That's not to say that you can behave any way you want to, and being reasonable people we normally don't. It's a tradition well over a thousand years old so we've had time to work out the kinks.

      But it's safe to say that the Nordic idea of land ownership is different from the Anglo Saxon one. (Think stewardship, rather than ownership).

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  317. Re:Dodging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, better to be in the Canadian military than the US military, eh?

    -- not a fortunate son

  318. P2P networks by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    A lot of Canadas laws are a lot less harsh than those in the USA. We have copyright obviously, but stuff like sharing music is legal. My friends can borrow my cd's and burn them, I can download from P2P networks, etc. All legally.

    True, though Telus doesn't mind sending looking up your name from your IP and sending you an e-mail:

    "We are writing to inform you that TELUS has received a complaint that alleges that your TELUS Internet Service account has been involved in copyright infringement. This complaint was traced back to your account based on the IP address used at the time of this activity.

    Please note that TELUS has not provided any of your personal account information to the complainant. It is TELUS' policy to disclose such information to a complainant only if ordered to do so by a court of law, which has not happened to date.

    ...

    Below is an excerpt from the complaint that we received regarding your account. We include it in this notice in an effort to help you identify the activity that is in question.

    ..."

    1. Re:P2P networks by devnullify · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons I really despise Telus is their privacy policy.

      A couple years back they implemented a transparent proxy for all http requests on their consumer DSL. When I phoned and asked about it, I was told that it would not, could not be disabled, and that they were indeed logging usage. Besides the privacy issues, it was a single point of failure, and every service outage I had with them was due directly to that proxy. I cancelled my account on the spot and found an independent DSL ISP that gives me much better service for the same money.

      It's fine that they're forwarding complaints, but due to recent precedent, they should inform their users of the law instead of just scaring them into compliance.

  319. Re:Dodging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...unless you become an errant (homeless, beggar, call it all you like, yet i prefer a more poetic term =P ), which, in montreal and canada in general, is definitely the way to go!! ;-)

  320. Re: Don't forget the pot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupidity + Globalization = Mass Destruction

    Narcotics + No Understanding Of Economics = Stupidity

  321. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    Hardly. British English is picking up many an Americanism these days... 'if I would have chosen to go out'... (shudder). If you learnt American English and spoke it over here, things would be fine. I do, after all watch The Simpsons, and some other people watch Friends (shudder). Also, it depends where you learn it... in New England, the English spoken is very similar to that in England.

  322. Excellent response, LD by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    And I'm glad that you point out how monsterously degrading this sordid behaviour was to the Iraqui inmates. These men are from a civilization who do not normally even let their wives see them naked. Public nakedness, and especially the exposing of male genitals to a female stranger is humiliating beyond description. I cannot believe my country did this to fellow human beings. This reprehensible activity will most certainly be punished, and unfortunately more Americans will now perish because of these evil acts committed in the name of George W. Bush. We have just rallied the entire Islamic world behind the Iraquis, something even Hussein and Bin-Laden were unable to do.

    This is one of those times when I am truly ashamed to be an American.

    1. Re:Excellent response, LD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what? It is monsterously degrading to force an unarmed man face down on the ground, grab him by the hair, and listen to him scream and gurgle and gasp for air as you slowly saw his head off. Do you realize that he was probably alive for over a minute as they hacked away at his backbone with that knife? I'd take the naked humiliation any day, thank you very much.

      Our leaders have apoligized for the abuses at that prison. So when is somebody (anybody) going to apologize to us for killing this poor guy?

  323. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 1

    Obviously the DVD manufacturers are messing with us because I live in Quebec and I own a few DVDs with english and spanish tracks only.

  324. They have names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hell, even if we knew the NAMES of the Iraqi prisoners, many of us probably wouldn't be able to even pronounce them properly.
    Haydar Sabbar Abed.
  325. Canadian arguments vs American arguments by vmalloc_ · · Score: 1

    I'd like to point out that all the posts here suggesting Canadian life is better are rated Informative, and all the posts here suggesting American life is better are rated Trolls. Real objective rating here guys.

  326. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Now, just how self centric are you to not even be willing to learn something new ?

    In the alternate universe where that was what was said, your comment would have made sense. Here in the real world where all the poster said was that you should practice up on French if you want to go to Quebec (which is the exact opposite of what you accused the poster of saying, your response was insulting and uncalled for.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  327. Blech by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    Have you TASTED Canadian beer? It's vile. The only stuff that's palatable is microbrew -- and microbrew is good in any country (the US included).

    Now, American bourbons on the other hand, are some damn fine potables.

    1. Re:Blech by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Have you TASTED Canadian beer? It's vile.

      Sissy. Canadian beer that's exported to the US is toned down for pansies like you. Up here, brewed full-strength, Canadians can easily handle the sumptuous taste of a perfect Indian Pale Ale like Alexander Keith's, while you gently sip your Budwater.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    2. Re:Blech by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      I'm as Canadian as they get, actually. I don't drink swill -- it's Granville Island brewery or nothing (at least as far as beer goes).

      Frankly, I'm surprised any Canadian drinks beer at all, given that we have such outstanding wineries in BC, superb Alberta vodkas, and even a home-grown bourbon.

    3. Re:Blech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm supprised you drink at all when you look at the prices for booze in Canada. 10-12 bucks for a mickey of Vodka. Alcohol is just too expensive up there.

    4. Re:Blech by ciskoh · · Score: 1

      Thus why we don't make best friends with mickey? :)

  328. It's not simple language issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are a lot of costs that come into play because of having an official second language.

    All software sold to the government and most industry must be NLS enabled just to deal with the language requirements. While it makes it easier to support other language and regional translations, it does add a fair bit to the coding efforts compared to english-only business programming.

    The non-french majority tends to get a touch annoyed at the seperate schools, seperate classes, etc. that are funded out of the general district pool. With such a low population percentage, there tends to be a much higher cost per student for the french programs, and much lower student-teacher ratios. With our crushing tax burden, people get right ticked about such wasteful spending, especially when it means cutbacks for the majority of students to fund the minority.

    Add in to that federal employment requirements that you must speak french, and people around here are starting to get pretty pissed off. Unemployment is rather high in the west, but the federal government is paying to move Quebecois new hires to fill federal positions out here, rather than hiring some of the unemployed locals.

    The final insult is the outrageous salary levels federal union employees receive compared to most local jobs. Compared to standard compensation packages, federal employment is platinum plated, but it's off limits to the majority of Canadians.

    In compensation for all the expense and special treatment, english-speaking Canadians get to enjoy having their own right to communicate officially trampled by the Quebec language laws. There have been dozens upon dozens of nazi-jackboot demands by the language police.

    In other words, you only have rights if you're from Quebec. The rest of us are screwed because the English decided to sign a treaty instead of wiping out the last shreds of resistance a few centuries ago.

  329. Corporate Life is Corporate Life.... by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

    The difference may not be so much between Canada and the US as it might be between large cities and small cities. Corpoate culture also depends on the company concerned. Heavily sales-oriented companies who live today and die tomorrow are always pressure cookers and tend to burn people out as part of the business plan for constant renewal. The downside is they have limited institutional memory and are the corporate equivalent of the gibbering idiot who never learns from mistakes. You probably really want to either start your own business or join a small company with people you like and get on well with. Corporates suck. All of them. I worked for several over the past 25 years and there is very little to redeem "corporate life". It comes close to being an oxymoron akin to "military intelligence".

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  330. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by frostman · · Score: 1

    Slightly off-topic note about subtitles:

    Subtitles are never the same as the actual spoken dialog.

    Try watching closed-caption TV sometime, where the dialog is (almost) always reproduced exactly.

    Note how much space they take up. Note how difficult it is to read all of them while still following the action. Of course the hearing-impaired probably get used to this quickly enough, but if you're not used to it it's really difficult.

    When subtitling a movie, you have a very small amount of space in which to convey the dialog in a way that "fits" with the feeling of the movie. And you have to be careful that your audience will have a realistic shot at actually reading them before they make space for the next lines.

    Add to that all the normal difficulties of translation.

    So, actually, yes, movies that have both dubbed (synchronized) and subtitled versions in a particular language are translated twice (though often the subtitle translation is based on the other). They are two completely different kinds of translation, each with its own requirements.

    I've watched director friends go through the subtitling process, and it's a semi-private hell of compromise.

    Anyway, as long as I'm digressing here, one more tip: for language learning, if you're not yet up to watching foreign-language films in the original with subtitles off, the next best thing is to watch films you already know very well, dubbed into the language you're trying to learn.

    Although talking to people is still better. :-)

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

  331. Health Care bottom line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    From the CIA factbook (and the *CIA* is not likely to be biased against the US!):



    Canada: life expectancy at birth 79.83 years



    United States: life expectancy at birth 77.14 years



    I'd say the Canadian health care system isn't too much worse than the American. (Check out the infant mortality statistics if you want another eye-opener.)


  332. So you want to know by LoganTeamX · · Score: 0

    Actually, I'm a Sys. Admin. for a large, internationally-focused mining contractor based out of Northern Ontario. Get used to the Friday beer club idea. Best relaxation technique EVER. Enjoy floor hockey with your co-workers at lunch 3 days a week. Enjoy the opportunity to train whenever possible. Enjoy the cleaner air, no matter WHERE you are (except for the cesspool that is Toronto) Drink Molson Canadian. It's what to drink while chasing beaver. Appreciate the fact you can drive 20 minutes to a decent campsite, and 40 minutes to the middle of nowhere. Gang violence is limited by and large to the major metropolitan areas, so your car will actually outlive you. Or is it the other way around? Enjoy getting paid what you're worth, and enjoy working for people that appreciate you.

    --
    One of the 187.
    1. Re:So you want to know by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      Actually, except for training not being as pleantiful here, you've just decribed my workplace, for the most part. Upstate NY has some decent jobs, and I'm not close to any gangs, and I'm not all that far from camping. And, I'm just minutes away from the pistol range, and friends houses to go target shooting at. Oh, and don't forget about off-roading... I do that on the weekends.

  333. Re:Dodging? by krez · · Score: 1

    Moving TO Canada? What a fool...

    Having worked on both sides of the border, and being a Canadian citizen, I can tell you the only three things that keep a person in Canada are: 1. family, 2. incompetence, or 3 both. I fall into the #3 category.

    But think of all the things you have to look forward to: higher taxes, less freedom, horrible health-care (it's illegal to have private coverage here), and a media even more leftist than France.

    --
    =U= "Just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you"
  334. Corporate Work in the US vs. Canada? by mister-entp · · Score: 1

    I moved to Canada from Silicon valley in California.

    California has pretty high taxes, but Canada has REALLY high taxes. It doesn't take that high of a salary to get up into the 50% tax bracket. Also, keep in mind that the sales tax in Ontario is 8% and that is on top of the GST (Goods and Services Tax) tax of 7% for a whopping 15% sales tax. That, remember, comes out of your NET earnings. There are few tax havens and gov't fees everywhere for everything under the sun.

    Housing here in the greater Toronto area is not cheap and is getting more expensive by the day. A small place with almost no yard will set you back about$250k to $300k.

    Sadly, with all these super high taxes, here in Toronto they can't even manage to keep the roads in fair shape. Pothole city.

    The politics here in general are rather lefty, especially Toronto. If you have any political objectivity, you'll quickly note how left wing the CBC (based in Toronto) is. What this means for you is astounding amounts of social programs with absolutely no thought as to how to drive an economy to pay for them. Fortunately, the NDP (Nutcake Democratic Party) is currently rather marginalized.

    If you are left wing, you'll like most of Canada. You wouldn't enjoy Alberta so much - it's more right wing.

    If you enjoy Anti-Americanism at its best, give Quebec a try.

    I recently heard from the US Consulate that Ontario has 250k Americans.

    What about corporate culture here? I've worked around the world and corporate culture is pretty much the same everywhere you go. Business is business. There's no big company group hug here if that's what you're looking for. Comapany's are looking to make profit here just as much as anywhere else in the world.

    Canada does have lots of freeloaders who don't pay taxes and milk the gov't programs.

    Canada also has tons of National and Provincial parks. I wish I had time to go to more of them - they're big, beautiful, and generally well kept and well run.

    Try it, you may like it here. At the very least, you'll learn more about the US by being out of it for awhile. Of course, after awhile, you'll also learn to ignore the constant anti-American whining here. Canadians have some serious identity issues and I've often thought that they define themselves not by the fact that they are Canadians, but by the fact that they are not Americans. Declaring what you are not doesn't tell you much about who you are.

  335. Not an analogy by obtuse · · Score: 1

    It's not an analogy, stupid. He's pointing out a direct and literal counterexample.

    Then you make a truly bad analogy, by comparing militant separatists to participants in a declared war.

    Whatever.

    It sucks that the US has made so many violent enemies in the world, including those in our own country. We all have our own enemies, even if Canada's enemies are fewer.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  336. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Brit who has worked in both US and Canada, I'd have to say Canada is a lot less screwed up than the US, but ultimately is dull and boring. Yes there are problems in the US but at least the US has an identity, unlike Canada. I found it a lot easier to make friends in the US and found people had much more sense of humour. The west coast/dot-com culture in US is great. In the US even some big companies do not ask "Does this person fit into our corporate culture". Its more like they care what you produce, not how you do it.
    Having now returned to the UK I'm happy to say we've absorbed plenty of US dot-com culture, and many of our stuffy corporates are losing ground to more interesting organisations.
    I have permanent resident card for Canada but can't bring myself to stay there. there's something profoundly missing from Canada. like a nation of people on prozac, never very sad, but never very happy. also heard it described as like a soup with perfect ingredients but no spice or flavouring. Brits and Americans can laugh at our own countries, because we know we're screwed up. Make a sarcastic comment about Canada and you'll get a frosty reception. there's a lot of great things about Canada. its just the people are so, er, weird! nice is not enough, you need personality as well.

  337. sounds like a good time to post a personals add by truffle · · Score: 1

    Single geeky canadian female seeks rebelious anti-bush american geek for marriage and world domination.

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
    1. Re:sounds like a good time to post a personals add by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      marry me!

  338. You: Recession Us: Not by Kombat · · Score: 1

    That must be the secret to how Canada became such an economic superpower. We Americans should learn from them.

    I know you were trying to be sarcastic, but you're not that far off from the truth. When the dot-bomb bubble burst, The US went through (is still going through?) an extended recession. Canada did not. We actually didn't have a recession at all - simply a slowing in growth and some lost IT jobs. The economy as a whole kept on truckin'.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  339. We don't care who you marry.... by chaeron · · Score: 1

    ...you can marry a same-sex partner in Canada, and no-one will blink at the throught.

    In fact, many Americans come to Canada to get hitched for just that reason.

    --
    .....Andrzej

    Chaeron Corporation
  340. how does one go about immigrating? by fulana_lover · · Score: 1

    If I do have the cash to hang out in Vancouver or Calgary for a while, how do I go about immigrating? From reading the canadian immigration website, it takes 6-16 months (!) to get a PR card, assuming you pass the tests and all that. If you are a US citizen, is there a faster route? Obviously I can just go up and chill, but eventually would need/want to work and buy a place and all that good stuff...

  341. Uninsured? Out of my ER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If a person enters a hospital in the US the hospital must treat them for all serious problems wether or not they can afford to pay."

    Or they might just lie and tell you your problem isn't serious, and hustle you out the door.

    This happened to a relative. He had a stroke while visiting relatives out of town, and went to the emergency room still partially paralyzed. In case this ever happens to you, prompt treatment for strokes makes _all_ the difference. For him, treatment was viable for up to three hours after the event. In other cases, stroke treatments can be even more urgent.

    They essentially refused to examine him and told him he'd had a TIA or Transient Ischemic Attack. A TIA is almost exactly like a stroke, but transient by definition; a short term event. They typically last as long as a few minutes. He had a stroke, and he'll never fully recover from the effects of that stroke.

    He might be able to walk without a cane, or not have the personality changes he has had since then, if the ER doctors hadn't just given him the bum's rush.

    Note: This man isn't insured, but he's a respectable looking guy who owns a beautiful house in a good part of town. He doesn't look like a hypochondriac, or someone looking for a bed for the night. He has typical risk factors for stroke, and should have been evaluated for a stroke, and actually treated for one. They didn't have to admit him for a TIA. If they had evaluated him more carefully, they might have had to treat him. Their diagnosis was one of convenience.

    It's horribly ironic that he's the sort of guy that you'd want with you if you went to the doctor if you were sick. He'd make sure they treated you well and took you seriously. He's very friendly, and makes sure he knows everybody. He also knows how to get things done. Unfortunately, when he drove to the ER, he was brain-injured and not himself.

  342. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    Wait. So, everyone learns English. I know English. What other language do I have to learn in order to communicate with most everyone? That's not self-centric, it's wisely spending my time learning things that are actually useful. :) (note, I do know Spanish, and you're right about the speed, but that's not really the point)

  343. Re:Don't Get Sick by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the vote of confidence. I've become convinced that it's mostly because of the tag line, rather than the content of the posts themselves.

    I agree that I should have said "handgun" rather than just "gun", but I doubt it would have made any difference. Without an endless diatribe about how the US government is even more rabidly anti-gun, and wants to install a medical monopoly that would make Canada's present one look like a model of personal choice, any statement about the negative impact of government control on peoples lives anywhere else is just setting ones self up for being called an ugly American.

    Gun control and central planning did directly facilitate the attack in 2001. Security methods were mandated from On High, rather than individual airports and airlines deciding how to best handle the security of their passengers, so the attackers knew what worked in one airport would work in all of them. The passengers and crew were all disarmed, by law, regardless of the wishes of the passengers or the airlines, so a few guys with knives could be certain of not having their victims fight back.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  344. Re:Socialist Country.... by thegrommit · · Score: 1

    Political systems are different than economic, genius.

    http://www.tse.com/en/aboutUs/tse/

    You were saying?

  345. Extrapolating by Cigarra · · Score: 1
    any-country-in-the-world-ian: "Tell me, what do Americans *really* think of ?"
    american: "we don't".

    And that's not very clever, u know.

    --
    I don't have a sig.
    1. Re:Extrapolating by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

      > any-country-in-the-world-ian: "Tell me, what do
      > Americans *really* think of ?"
      > american: "we don't".

      And that, of course, is nonsense. We thought a lot about Germany and Japan during WWII. We thought a lot about Korea, Vietnam, NATO, China, and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Today we think a lot about Iraq, North Korea, Germany, France, Britain, Japan, and a whole bunch of other countries.

      By comparison, Canada doesn't matter. Let me repeat that. Canada. Doesn't. Matter. And that rankles Canadians much more than it would if we merely disliked them like North Korea. Once again: Canada. Doesn't. Matter.

      PS - Any reply to this posting that mentions "UN peacekeepers" or "#1 rated country in UN survey" ipso facto proves my point.

  346. Don't Get Me Wrong... by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 1

    Hey, in some ways Canada is a really great place. Much more intelligent marijuana policies, for instance, rather than the absurdities of the prohibitionist polypramatoi control freaks in the US. What I don't like is being forced to pay for other peoples medical choices, but every country has forced entitlements of one sort or another. The only difference is extent.

    Unfortunately, the US is in serious decline. I figure I'll jump ship for China in not too many years, try to catch them in their ascendency.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  347. How many times do I have to post this? by leoxx · · Score: 1
    I can find plenty of horror stories about the US medical system as well. The fact is, both systems have their benefits and their drawbacks, but overall Canada's "social" medical system is no worse, but not really any better, than the private US system.


    I got lots more interesting links where those came from.

  348. Detroit's service folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good observation on RenCen service... I worked in that area for a few years and I noticed the same thing. (It would be difficult to miss.)

    As you may know, Detroit's history is a bit complicated (usually reducing to "too much, too soon") and marked by racial tensions. That has much to do with what you observe.

  349. Of course, by empaler · · Score: 1

    the bacon. Never heard of the beer, but we're the country of Carlsberg... (though I prefer our much less known Faxe).

    Funny little fact about Carlsberg: It's a super-danish beer, but the place it's named after is now in Germany (due to voluntary annexation after an election!). Oh, and the brewer who dubbed the hill Carlsberg proudly named it after his own son, Carl. Who then grew up and started his own brewery, that became Carlsberg's biggest competitor. And was (a century) later bought by Carlsberg.

    Very odd, indeed.

    1. Re:Of course, by kir · · Score: 1

      Here is something for you. Carlsbeg is quite popular here in Japan. A nice resturant down the street from me serves it. MMMMMmmmm...

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
  350. Don't Expect Drastic Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing as how the brunt of our major businesses are U.S. owned companies, don't expect that large of a difference. Minimum wage will be better, but I don't think that's really gonna matter to ya.

  351. Canada's Anti-Terrorism Legislation by Kombat · · Score: 1

    We certainly dont have anything like the patriot act

    Uh, yes we do.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  352. You can copy a friend's cds in the US by wurp · · Score: 2, Informative
    In the US, you have every right to get together with friends and make tape copies or digital copies of music on digital audio recording equipment.

    I'm not sure what this means about copying a CD someone else bought to a tape, but copying a CD for a friend using digital audio equipment and audio cds is perfectly legal, and copying an audio tape to another audio tape is also legal. We pay a "tax" to the RIAA on every piece of digital audio equipment, audio CD, and audio tape to allow this per The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992.

  353. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by poiuyt23 · · Score: 1

    in New England, the English spoken is very similar to that in England.

    Yessuh, those English speak like us downeasters Ayuh!

  354. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    oddly enough I pay 159 dollars a month for medicare, which i am ineligible to use.

    My employer and I together pay 110 a month for my PPO service, which entitles me to go anywhere I want and I only pay 20% of the bill.

    too bad I can't get that medicare money back, and subsidize my private plan, or place it in an investment account for when I am old and actually would use the money.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  355. Not entirely different by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

    Canadian corporate life is different, not in the business model sense but certainly in the stress-level sense. The overall feel here is to provide a quality service or product; not crush the competition by beating them to the punch with a shoddy product that happened to come out first (M$ take note). The philosophy here is more geared toward a "proof's in the pudding" mentality with regards to capitalism.

    --
    ========
    77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
  356. [nt] the answer is: more niggers in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  357. Insurance is fucked up everywhere by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    I get a sweet rate from Farmer's auto here in Texas. Every competitive quote I've ever gotten has been orders of magnitude higher. No one can explain why, so I stick with Farmer's. Yay.

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    1. Re:Insurance is fucked up everywhere by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I've got no complaints with Manitoba Public Insurance. My rates have gone down 2 years in a row.

  358. Canada is coporate America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're going to be shocked to find Home Depot everywhere. You'll also see McDonalds on every corner. Subway dominates the sandwich fast food market and Walmart is everywhere. You might notice a few different stores like Canadian Tire (Crappy Tire as it is affectionately called by the Canadians), Tim Hortons, and Revy.

    The fact of the matter is that Corporate America is all over Canada. It's hard to tell at times what country you're in.

    The easiest way to find out what country you're in is by getting hit by a car. If you die waiting for medical care in the emergency room then you're in Canada. If you get right in and are saved by the doctors which now own all of your earthly posessions then your in the USA.

    You sound like a whiney bitch that is going to be miserable no matter where you live. As an American hater, you'll fit in well in places like Montreal. I wouldn't venture to Alberta or the Western provinces because they most likely will not share you're hatred of all things American.

    If you're so disappointed with the way that "corporate America" has dealt with you maybe you should start your own company. That's what the USA is all about. It still is the land of opportunity.

    Good luck in Canada. I doubt they'll accept you. There is no demand for whiney server admins with little to no ambition.

  359. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by McGillGirl · · Score: 2, Informative
    La situation en Quebec est plus difficulte si vous ne parlez pas ce que on crois serait francais la. If you couldn't read the sentence above as fast as the one before it, reconsider moving to Quebec.
    Err... I live in Quebec and was raised in french. Yet, I have trouble understanding what you wrote. Next time you want to show off, at least don't use Babelfish. And by the way, at lot of people in Montreal (the biggest city in Quebec) don't speak a word of french. They still can study and work in english. There are 2 english universities in Montreal (McGill and Concordia) and in most workplaces (especially in IT) both languages are equally used, and that's when we don't end up all speaking in english anyway. Of course, it's easier to know both languages, but that's also applicable to people that only know french.
  360. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for showing everyone why we hate French Canadians.

  361. They were say this in Spain too by peter303 · · Score: 1

    "We are not important" "Terrorists would never attack us" "Helping the US is not significant"

  362. Housing prices vary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Cost of living is cheaper in Canada overall--Houses cost a bit less

    As with all things, this will vary. Housing in the Toronto area is notoriously expensive as compared to many other parts of Canada. I live in the States just on the other side of Lake Ontario. I have lots of Canadian friends.

  363. best reason to move by TTL0 · · Score: 1

    Hockey Night in Canada need I say more ?

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
  364. [nt] those helicopter flights are EXPENSIVE!!! by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  365. My experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I worked at large Canadian telecommunications company that has fallen on hard times (and shall remain nameless ;-) one summer while finishing up my undergrad in CS. I REALLY didn't enjoy the environment. I was split between a testing group and a sysadmin group and found that the people I was working with were more interested in complaining about their hours or how much money they were getting (business was booming at the time and all of them were making far more than their education/experience/contribution entitled them to) rather than actually doing anything.

    In a small company there's no where to hide, and people have to pull their weight. I think there are more people playing games than working at corporations all over the world, definitely including Canada.

  366. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by CrimeaRiver · · Score: 2
    >French is deceptively difficult language for Americans

    As an American who learned French after moving to France five years ago, I find it easy to communicate in French because so many English words are French cognates. Once I caught on to French pronunciation, I suddenly understood a lot because I recognized many words that are very similar or the same in English. When speaking, if I don't know the French word for something, I sometimes try using the English word pronounced with my best approximation of a French accent. Often this works.

    Cognates help in reading as well. Take a look at this sentence from an article in today's Le Monde online newspaper:
    Le candidat démocrate estime que la politique du président américain en Irak a coûté aux Etats-Unis leurs respect et influence dans le monde.
    Nearly every word in that sentence could be recognized by an English speaker.
    • Le candidat = the candidate
    • démocrate = democrat
    • estime = feels, (related to the English word esteem, which as a verb has the same meaning)
    • la politique = the politics
    • président = president
    • américain = american
    • Irak = Iraq
    • coûté = cost, (the circumflex accent indicates an unwritten 's' that follows the letter)
    • Etats = States
    • Unis = United
    • respect = respect
    • influence = influence
    All together, the sentence in English is:

    The democratic candidate feels that the politics of the American president in Iraq has cost the United States their respect and influence in the world.
    Try thumbing through an English dictionary sometime and look at the etymology of words. Many, if not a majority, of English words come from French.

    As for the differences between Canadian-French and French-French, I've never been to Quebec, but I've never had trouble conversing with Quebecois in French.

  367. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Etyenne · · Score: 1

    Please clarify. What exactly make you hate French Canadian ? The fact that someplace, some people speak something else than English ?

    --
    :wq
  368. Rights vs. Privlidge by RawCode · · Score: 1

    Here is Canada, owning a gun is a privlidge, not a right (just like driving)

    In the US, owning a gun is a right, which cant (easily) be removed. Note: Driving is still a privlidge in the US

  369. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Bazouel · · Score: 1

    They tend to rather touchy about their quaint local legacy language.

    I suppose that little gem what not insulting to anyone in your universe ...

    --
    Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
  370. Thanks to all by ChozSun · · Score: 1

    I am trying to get my family of 3 to Canada from the US. This thread has been the most hopeful to me. I have been trying to look for work in Canada for about a year.

    I am also saving the required amount of money for a family of 3 to get to Canada if I did not have a job (but I should still come in as Skilled Worker). Since being laid off from the dotcom salaries and having to pick up a job that paid 79% less in less than a month, I have tightened our budgets since then. I have recently started a contract gig with a well-known software company and with that money and our tight budget, I should be able to save the money in no time.

    I wanted to say thank you to everyone who posted on this thread. You have made a would-be Canadian (yes I will become a citizen as soon as I can) very happy and even more prepared.

    On a lighter note, I think I am prepared socially:

    1. Being part of a mixed couple (Korean/Scottish and African-American), Toronto sounds keen.

    2. By not a fan of the cannabis achieva but know a lot of people who do, Vancouver sounds keen.

    3. With hockey is my favorite sport, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa sounds keen

    4. Rush is one of my favorite rock bands of all time.

    I think I am ready for Canada.

    --
    ChozSun
    ChozSun.com
    1. Re:Thanks to all by jwsmith00 · · Score: 1
      I think that people who wish to immigrate to Canada need to consider one more thing when choosing a location. Do you want a family doctor? Most cities do not have any family doctors who are accepting patients. That's right. You are reading that correct. Toronto fortunately does (though only a handful last time I checked Other options for non-emergency situations include walk-in clinics. But the queues are very long and the doctors have no idea who you are (you'll probably get a different one each time you go). And there are no appointments (FIFO). Another option is to go to a medical school and see a medical intern. Again, the same problems that exist with walk-in clinics.

      So while Canada may seem like a great country, it has a lot of its own problems. I think that Canada has its share of problems as does the USA. Some things are better in one country and others are better in the other. It's all of matter of taste and your political views. Canada is much more socialist.

      If you are considering a move to Ontario, Canada, I would recommend the Doctor Search at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario site.

    2. Re:Thanks to all by ChozSun · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I consider myself to be socialist and not a capitalist. It seems quite silly to me to spend most of your life trying to achieve something that is so trivial such as money.

      I have considered Regina (straight shot from Texas), Vancouver (absolutely love the city when I visited) and Toronto (culturely speaking). What is odd is that I am all for social medicine but thanks to God, we are all perfectly healthly.

      --
      ChozSun
      ChozSun.com
  371. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Etyenne · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Most Region 1 DVD have been translated in Quebec. Why I know ? Because they keep the same (Quebec) actor to dub Hollywood celebrities in every movies, and I recognize them. It's funny to watch Brad Pitt but hear Alain Zouvi (a totally different type of actor) speak.

    Feel free to point to specific movie whose translation have been done in Europe, though.

    --
    :wq
  372. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your reply and interesting information. Where else but Slashdot could anyone have learned this?

  373. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your extended reply.

    I've always thought that because of the high ratio of cognates that French should be easy to learn. There probably is a point of exposure to the language where the one can hear the cognates through the pronounciation differences. At that point, comprehension and structure begin to take place. The spoken phonetics become understandable words.

    A problem for learning languages in the US is that one never hears them, with the exception of Spanish. In twenty years of living on the west coast of the US, I've heard French spoken twice, both times on the bus. Hardly anyone here is aware that Canada is actually two nations in one country and that the entire linguistic environment changes at the Quebec border.

    Exposure to French on the west coast is all but nonexistant. The only way to hear the language is to get videos of old 'New Wave' films by Truffaut and Godard from the library, switch the DVD audio track to French (if it exists), or use internet radio streaming to link into a Montreal radio station.

    I've just about given up putting any effort into learning French because there is so little use for it. Except for once every five or ten years when I go to Quebec or France and find that I can almost understand what is being said but actually comprehend nothing.

    Anyway, I believe that the reason that French and English have so many cognates is because the Normans from NW France ruled England from 1066 to the 1400s? and forced all government business to be done in their language and Latin. That statement assumes that the Normans spoke a version of French, which might not be true.

    Slashdot is a place where one can throw out wild and unsubstanciated claims that one suspects are true and get blasted as a complete idiot by people who actually do know what they are talking about. It's better than saying the same thing at a party and being made a fool in real life.

    Thanks again for the reply.

  374. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the reply.

    I suspect that in about thirty years we will have glasses that will 'project' the subtitles in near-real time of our conversations with people that are speaking different languages.

    A big part of the algorythm for doing these titles will be the compromise of getting the essential core of the dialog, as you have pointed out is done with the subtitle process in today's films.

    Thanks again for your reply.

  375. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Technology writer George Gilder once said that the only languages that one needs to know to be successful are English and C++.

    Language translation will probably be the next 'killer ap' for 64 and 128 bit, 100 GigaHertz computers that we will have on desks in ten years. It may be too early to start companies to do this now, but in five years it will be a major money maker for the information technology industry.

    Thanks for your reply to my message.

  376. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your reply.

    Most Americans are humbled and intimidated by other people's ability to master languages. They hide it with a false projection of linguistic ethnocentricism.

    I'm always amazed that Americans will assume that someone from the USA who learns a hundred words of, say, an Asian language is considered a genius (especially if they are African-American in background) while a person from Asia who isn't fluent in English is 'slow'. It seems to be an unconscious form of racism that gets missed until pointed out.

    Possibly the reason that it is so much fun to bash the people in Quebec about their language is the obsession that they have about stopping English from creeping into general usage. Their language laws are unique for North America and are somewhat extreme. For example, no language but French allowed in any commercial signs. Here in the US we have entire shopping malls that are owned by friends, family, and organizations that are all of one ethnic background. And all the signs in all the stores will be in Korean, Chinese, Spanish, or Russian. I've never seen this in other countries. And it would be seriously illegal in Quebec.

    Anyway, thanks for your reply.

  377. Europe, y'all by CrimeaRiver · · Score: 1

    You think Europe has no rednecks? Think again pardner. I see them over here all the time. Where do you think American rednecks came from? They migrated from Europe.

    Europe isn't exactly immune to American cultural influence, either. Arguably the most popular sitcoms, movies, and music in France are American.

  378. Re:No Rep. BS needed, your health care system suck by RomulusNR · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love the "Canadian healthcare kills people" argument. American HMO bureaucracy and denials of coverage (not just *delays*, but DENIALS) kill people too. So what's your fucking point? Or do we all need to sit here and throw isolated anecdotes at each other?

    Our own government admits that Canadians have better health hopes than Americans:

    America:
    Death rate:
    8.44 deaths/1,000 population (2003 est.)
    Infant mortality rate:
    total: 6.75 deaths/1,000 live births
    Life expectancy at birth:
    total population: 77.14 years

    Canada:
    Death rate:
    7.61 deaths/1,000 population (2003 est.)
    Infant mortality rate:
    total: 4.88 deaths/1,000 live births
    Life expectancy at birth:
    total population: 79.83 years

    They manage to beat us at every reasonably meaningful measurement of health and longevity, and they do it without privatization!

    Though they don't leave more money in *your* pocket; and therefore, as a strategy of national interest, it fails.

    Note: the above numbers are not isolated to well-off conservatives.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  379. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by JonMartin · · Score: 1
    It seemed to be very expensive to live there. I live on the low side of middle class in a moderately priced West Coast USA city, and BC seemed to be rather expensive. Especially the provincial coupled with the federal sales tax, the various GSTs PSTs VATs whatever.

    Come to Alberta. No PST (still have stupid 7% federal GST), flat 10% provincial income tax. Cost of living is among the lowest in the country. And the government is swimming in petro-dollars. On the downside a lot of Albertans are super-right-wing (by Canadian standards). And our Premier is a jerk (recently caught plagarizing).

    --
    Serve Gonk.
  380. Re:Extrapolating (further) by goatpunch · · Score: 1

    Any-country-in-the-world-ian: "do Americans *really* think?"
    American: "we don't".

  381. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    I've got English down, but my C++ is kinda rickety (lack of recent practice will do that). I know Perl, though, and it'll compile down to something nearly as useful... ;) There's probably already a language translation module on CPAN anyway.

  382. Insurance Providers, not Care Providers by exgeekscooby · · Score: 1

    Please make the distinction between "private care providers" and "private insurance providers." It is the insurance industry that is killing Americans, not the care providers. Well, at least 99.5% of providers. (There are always those docs with handguns, don't forget.)

    And I forgive your alliteration.

    --
    -- "Macsbug is not a screensaver."
  383. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

    . If you studied a little French in school because French was the cool language to study instead of studying Spanish (which is the only language that Americans should seriously consider studying as it's not even a 'foreign' language here anymore), well then, yes, check out Quebec

    French as spoken in France and French as spoken in Quebec are somewhat different - imagine the difference between modern English and Shakespeare's English. For example, everyone in France says "le weekend". In Quebec, it's "le fin de semaine", which no-one in France says anymore. So, learning French French in school wouldn't have helped much anyway - you have to learn Quebecois French.

  384. Re:Canada's not So Bad,.... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    Of course it was insulting. But an insulting subjective opinion (calling a language quaint and legacy) is not on the same order of magnitude as an outright factual lie about a completley objective matter - which is what you were doing by claiming he was unwilling to learn the language after he just got done describing steps he took to learn the language.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  385. American vs. Canadian Insurance Co. by jcpii · · Score: 1

    I currently work with Primerica, a member of Citigroup. The parent company is US-based (international), but the Primerica Life company operates out of both Canada and the US as separate companies to some degree. I've found the "corporate environment" to be unrivaled. This company has only the best in mind for all related parties. I love the place and will never leave. I highly recommend you go to your local office and check them out, esp. considering your background.

    Best of Luck

    -jcpii

    "Compound interest is the most powerful force in the Universe." -Albert Einstein

  386. Re:Don't Get Sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the good people shoot the bad people? Ya that's workin' real well in the states and it would be particularly effective on an airplane.

    US foreign policy facilitated 9/11. Duh...

  387. Re:Just to clarify... socialism doesn't work. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the information, puppetman, and sorry to any Canadians I offended with my poorly-thought out comments. I'll try to be better informed next time rather than just go shooting off my big ignorant mouth.

  388. Machiavelli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You miss the point, as the Bush government also seems to do.

    Machiavelli once wrote that a ruler can be either loved or feared, but - since people are fickle - fear is more reliable. The Bush administration seems to have taken this to heart.

    However, Machiavelli never had to contend with people who can not be made to fear. If a zealot is willing - eager, even - to die for his cause, how can you possibly make him afraid? If your only policy instrument is fear, all you can do is antagonize him and goad him into attacking you.

    The Bush administration needs to realize that fear and force are not complete policy instruments - there are problems that they _can not solve_. Short of genocide, there is NO WAY to use force and fear alone to get Iraq to do what we want.

    Israel has tried force and fear to stop Palestinian terrorist attacks for _decades_, and without success. If this strategy has a proven track record of failure, why are we relying on it?

    We want to avoid being disliked not because being liked is spiffy, but because being hated will lead directly to dead Americans. You can joke about it all you want, but the bottom line is that, until we learn to play nice with the rest of the world, our actions will continue to lead directly to dead Americans, and there's nothing we can do to stop that.

  389. More Climate Variability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in Victoria they have an anual New Years Day Blossom Count festival. My vegetable and herb gardens in Nanaimo grow year round (with slightly modified selection & some coldframes). Most of the populated parts of Vancouver Island are about as warm as the Oregon coast.

  390. As an American working in Montreal... by melee · · Score: 1

    Did you just equate "more free" to "more European"?

    I will have to imagine you mean free with regards to "we drink legally at a younger age and show breasts on broadcast television" (in which case you'd be right) rather than toleration of speech (in which case you'd be wrong.)

  391. Re: Don't forget the pot! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    Gee, musta taken you all day to come up with that one

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth