Warning Windows have detected that some critical files have been replaced. Windows will now replace them with back up copies. All your user-interface are belong to us.
Basically instead of the usual blurb like "New! Create your own customized Google News." you get an invite if you hit the luck random number when the page is loaded.
Re:the link is one-time
on
Gmail Goes Public
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
I think that is kind of the point.
It keeps people from signing up for the accounts with a bot better than the obscured numbers thing does. (Although it is possible to automate joining still.)
Re:Googlebombing is part of Google's design flaw.
on
'Online Poker' Googlebomb
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Results 1 - 10 of about 773,000 for "to be or not to be". . (0.14 seconds)
Shakespeare - To be, or not to be: that is the question... William Shakespeare - To be, or not to be (from Hamlet 3/1). To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The... www.artofeurope.com/shakespeare/sha8.htm - 3k - Cached - Similar pages
To BE or Not to BE, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love...All you ever wanted to know about barium enemas but were afraid to ask from the webisite for adults, married adults that is. marriedadults.com/bariumenema.php - 12k - Cached - Similar pages
To Be or Not to Be (1942)To Be or Not to Be - Cast, Crew, Reviews, Plot Summary, Comments, Discussion, Taglines, Trailers, Posters, Photos, Showtimes, Link to Official Site,... www.imdb.com/title/tt0035446/ - 47k - Cached - Similar pages
Amazon.com: DVD: To Be Or Not to Be (1942)To Be Or Not to Be, Ernst Lubitsch, Carole Lombard, Jack Benny, Robert Stack, Felix Bressart, Lionel Atwill, Stanley Ridges, Sig Ruman, Tom Dugan,... www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ tg/detail/-/B0006Z2KYI?v=glance - 76k - Cached - Similar pages
Where is the -1 Patently False moderation tag when you need it?
The following words are very common and were not included in your search: to be to be. [details] Lowercase "or" was ignored. Try "OR" to search for either of two terms. [details]
Authors may wish to define additional link types not described in this specification. If they do so, they should use a profile to cite the conventions used to define the link types. Please see the profile attribute of the HEAD element for more details.
No by my logic we could find out because the police would break into your house. Thus if you were up to something they would know.
Please note that I am in support of proper controls on the treatment of detainies. I just don't think that the New York Times for instance is qualified to judge what torture is or is not.
Nope, doesn't work that way. Not only is it wrong to say that a thread is over when Godwin's Law is invoked anyway (Usenet threads virtually always outlive their usefulness), but long ago a corollary to the Law was proposed and accepted by Taki "Quirk" Kogama (quirk@swcp.com):
Quirk's Exception: Intentional invocation of this so-called
"Nazi Clause" is ineffectual.
I've seen the cages they are in. They are bigger than my bedroom. Sleep deprivation is uncomforable, but hardly brutal. While it does drive people insane they recover as soon as they can sleep properly.
You have no clue what these people have done. Neither do I. While I think that there needs to be a review of the facts about each of the cases down there I have little doubt that many of them are just what they are accused to be.
Meanwhile the conditions that they are living in are far from the brutal situation that American troops would be if they were captured by the other side. These detainies are being clothed, fed, given medical treatment, and allowed to practice their religions with only a few restrictions. Meanwhile American troops that are captured are being beheaded. I feel completely comforatble taking the moral high ground on this issue.
By that logic you and your family are obviously breaking the law because I don't know that you aren't. I should therefore send the police to your house daily to make sure you aren't up to something.
I would rather the posts remain uneditable since that would be abused for karma.
What would be nice is if all replies by one author to another one of his posts would be appended to the original post and would ineligible for moderation.
At the time it was a sound investment, but it would be cheaper now days to set up a very large array type thing with low quality recievers on commercial sats. Then you can just take the raw data you get back and throw in into a SETI@home type thing to combine the feeds.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually men in that case was refering to women as well. It was refering to the race of man.
Bah. That story is just a cover-up.
It was the three headed aliens who destroyed the flying wing because it resembled their reproductive organs.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former." Albert Einstein
Warning Windows have detected that some critical files have been replaced. Windows will now replace them with back up copies.
All your user-interface are belong to us.
Based on a Futurama quote.
"Hell hath
no fury like the vast robot armies of a woman scorned"
I couldn't remember the whole thing when I typed it in from memory.
PAK CHOOIE UNF
DMCA only prevents circumvention of copy protection measures. Unless the game allows you to copy it when you beat it cheats are perfectly legal.
Dracula must be pissed
Its a random invite on Google's main page.
So its a one time deal.
I got one last night.
Basically instead of the usual blurb like "New! Create your own customized Google News." you get an invite if you hit the luck random number when the page is loaded.
I think that is kind of the point.
It keeps people from signing up for the accounts with a bot better than the obscured numbers thing does. (Although it is possible to automate joining still.)
Where is the -1 Patently False moderation tag when you need it?
The reason http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=to+be+or+not
So all that google sees is "not"
So would the absense of slashdot. What is your point?
RYOFA (Read your own fricking article)
Actually Slashdot is a few hundred thousand blogs all thrown into a giant pot. What did you think Journals were?
As does his. My point exactly. Thank you.
No by my logic we could find out because the police would break into your house. Thus if you were up to something they would know.
Please note that I am in support of proper controls on the treatment of detainies. I just don't think that the New York Times for instance is qualified to judge what torture is or is not.
Do you not want to stop the uninstall of the absense of this program?
[I don't care] [No] [I like pie]
No.
Its the old "All my friends are doing it.".
http://www.killfile.org/~tskirvin/faqs/godwin.htm
I do support your point in general though.
I support 40th term abortions
I've seen the cages they are in. They are bigger than my bedroom. Sleep deprivation is uncomforable, but hardly brutal. While it does drive people insane they recover as soon as they can sleep properly.
Jumper cables to the gonads however...
You have no clue what these people have done. Neither do I. While I think that there needs to be a review of the facts about each of the cases down there I have little doubt that many of them are just what they are accused to be.
Meanwhile the conditions that they are living in are far from the brutal situation that American troops would be if they were captured by the other side. These detainies are being clothed, fed, given medical treatment, and allowed to practice their religions with only a few restrictions. Meanwhile American troops that are captured are being beheaded. I feel completely comforatble taking the moral high ground on this issue.
By that logic you and your family are obviously breaking the law because I don't know that you aren't. I should therefore send the police to your house daily to make sure you aren't up to something.
I would rather the posts remain uneditable since that would be abused for karma.
What would be nice is if all replies by one author to another one of his posts would be appended to the original post and would ineligible for moderation.
Because it is over priced and outdated.
At the time it was a sound investment, but it would be cheaper now days to set up a very large array type thing with low quality recievers on commercial sats. Then you can just take the raw data you get back and throw in into a SETI@home type thing to combine the feeds.