Slashdot Mirror


Hitachi Unveils Humanoid Robot

HunahpuMonkey writes "BBC reports that Hitachi has unveiled a humanoid robot, named Emiew, to compete with Honda's Asimo and Sony's Qrio robots. The robot has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for practical office and factory use. In addition, it is the fastest robot to date, moving 3.7 miles per hour on wheel feet which resemble the bottom half of a Segway scooter."

245 comments

  1. Battle Stairs! by BWJones · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, here is the challenge:

    Hitachi's new wheeled robot versus Honda's Asimo and Sony's Qrio in BATTLE STAIRS! First one down a flight of 100 steps intact wins.

    :-)

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Battle Stairs! by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the title is kinda misleading, for some reason when I heard humanoid I thought of bipedal legs, like most humans have. I have this humanoid hand puppet that can flail like a monster.

    2. Re:Battle Stairs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pusher robot will referee.

    3. Re:Battle Stairs! by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0

      Pusher robot will referee.

      Shover Robot will referee much more.

    4. Re:Battle Stairs! by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      To be more PC hitachi developed this robot as not to be insensitive to those who are movement challenged are require a wheelchair. Next they will be devloping a full line of robots based on various sexual orientations. But they may meet with opposition from Lucasfilm as George Lucas designed the first homosexual robot C3PO.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    5. Re: Battle Stairs! by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Funny
      "First one down a flight of 100 steps *intact* wins."

      So what do the rules of this competition say about winning? Would that be "to move down the steps fastest", or would they allow "to fall down in the shortest possible time, and built strong enough to survive the impact?"

      The most difficult road is the most interesting one.

    6. Re:Battle Stairs! by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

      Yes, it has the dreaded Dalak flaw. But that's the only way we'll be able to defeat them when they try to take over. The story doesn't say if "Exterminate!" is part of their vocabulary. Yet.

    7. Re:Battle Stairs! by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Funny
      In all honesty, if the steps are equal in length and hieght, the Hitachi could slide on its back by accelerating really fast. After sliding down, it would just keep rolling.

      For REAL fun, I say give the stairs various heights and widths, maybe a turn or two and some spikes. I LOOOVE me some spikes.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    8. Re: Battle Stairs! by Da+Fokka · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meet my unbeatable entry, called the Bowling-Bo. Maybe not as good on manual labour as the Hitachi version but it only has a vocabulary of 100 words less and will pwn the stair challenge.

    9. Re:Battle Stairs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh funny, but what if the Hitachi robot was smart enough to lay down a ramp on top if the stairs first. ;)

    10. Re: Battle Stairs! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If it can slide down, it can probably go down in a more dignified way by remaining vertical provided the structure is sturdy enough.. though stopping mid stairs might be interesting.

      I would like to see the up-the-stairs competition. Oh yes.. and spikes.. definately spikes.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:Battle Stairs! by coder.keitaro · · Score: 1

      Forget stairs!

      This is covered by other agencies than the BBC.
      [Pity I submitted the story 6 hours after the poster! Damn my timezone! ^-^]

      The Japan Times has something interesting to add to the discussion;

      Reporters invited to a Tokyo demonstration Tuesday were instructed not to touch the two still-experimental robots for safety's sake.

      I just could not get OCP's ED209 out of my head.

      --
      watashi wa bengoshi dewa arimasen!
    12. Re:Battle Stairs! by flumps · · Score: 1

      It could do hand stands i suppose... ;)

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    13. Re: Battle Stairs! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      My brother used to work in a bowling place. He threw one of those bowling balls against the wall, and it broke. Those things aren't as strong as they look.

    14. Re:Battle Stairs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the picture though...
      The robot is saluting and the sarariman is trying to shake the robot's hand.

      Surely nothing could go wrong, Dave?

    15. Re:Battle Stairs! by frankenbox · · Score: 1

      I would be happy to just see em' on Battlebots! Bots won't thrill me, till they are covered in rubber. My personal favorite is the nanny-bot from AI.. (: Of course it may be some plot by the Japanese to take over the world. We are too smart for that, and we have REALLY BIG PENIS!!!! so it won't work.

    16. Re: Battle Stairs! by phaggood · · Score: 1, Funny

      My brother used to work in a bowling place. He threw one of those bowling balls against the wall,

      Hence, used to work.

    17. Re:Battle Stairs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude get it right!
      It's a Mark 3 Travel Machine! : )

      It's the next step in our evolution from whining complaining couch potatoes to our true form as squishy mewling blobs of protoplasm that Exterminate everything in sight!

      As for me, I can't wait. Free endorphins for everyone.

      ****************TROLL TIME************************

      I, for one, welcome our Segway enabled robotic overlords!

      In Soviet Russia, robot segways you!

      And now, time for some classics just in time for Episode III:

      Well, I have a problem. I'm possesed with the obsession of Naked and Petrified women. Specifically Natalie Portman who run with endless fountain streams of hot grits. (who truly has the full text of this)

      What would Roland Piquapille think of this?

      Yeeeeehhaaaa!

      wtar thre's a pwievw btton?

  2. Cog and Kismet by filmmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Totota and Hitachi got nuthin' on MIT's Cog and Kismet

    I foresee a fight scene ala Anchorman; Cog wielding a switch-blade.

    "Como estas, bitches!"

    1. Re:Cog and Kismet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides that the japanese companies robots actually work and MIT's stuff is just over-rated hype?

    2. Re:Cog and Kismet by filmmaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your VCR also actually works. It also has an extremely limited and unambitious feature set.

      That's not to say that the Japanese robots aren't major accomplishments; they are. So is a VCR, if you think about it. Just not when you stack it up against the goal of creating true AI, which is what Cog is all about, "humanoid intelligence."

    3. Re:Cog and Kismet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still they are just talking the talk, not walking the walk, which is what I have come to expect from MIT lately.

    4. Re:Cog and Kismet by MarkMcLeod · · Score: 0

      "Como estas, Robot Bitches"

  3. oooooo, 100 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have called it Project Einstein.

  4. Intelligencia by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The robot has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for practical office and factory use"

    I don't know about you, but a 100 word vocabulary is already vastly superior to some of the factory workers I've worked with.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:Intelligencia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but a 100 word vocabulary is already vastly superior to some of the factory workers I've worked with.

      I worked in a factory. One of my coworkers used a calculator to figure out what 10 * 20 was, repeatedly. We worked on a line that churned out 2x4s into pallets and wrapped them. They came in about 5 different configurations. This person must have been 45 years old.

    2. Re:Intelligencia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a 100 word vocabulary is already vastly superior to some of the factory workers I've worked with.

      It even compares admirably with the average slashdotters vocabulary. ..and yes, this was obligatory..

    3. Re:Intelligencia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't know who modded you funny, factory workers are literary Goliaths compared to the president of the USA.

      +5 Shit Scary.

    4. Re:Intelligencia by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      Obligatory?

      Me fail english? That's unpossible!
      (Yeah, I know, bad quote but a single word post does not pass the lameness filter so technically this is filler).

    5. Re:Intelligencia by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      Me fail French? C'est Unpossible!

    6. Re:Intelligencia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a single word post does not pass the lameness filter so technically this is filler

      I beg to differ.

    7. Re:Intelligencia by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      WellIGuessIWasWrong:)

    8. Re:Intelligencia by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      Me fail French? C'est Unpossible!

      Toi pas savoir bien parler la France.
      And if you're francophobe: http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en.

  5. Something about that name... by spawnofbill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone else get the mental image of a large feathered robot with a tendency to hump sunbathing women? Or is it just me?

    1. Re:Something about that name... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone else get the mental image of a large feathered robot with a tendency to hump sunbathing women? Or is it just me?

      I believe it is just you.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    2. Re:Something about that name... by spawnofbill · · Score: 0

      oh. Ok. Just checking... I'm still getting the mental image...

    3. Re:Something about that name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh.. I thought you meant you had a tendency to try to hump sunbathing women.

    4. Re:Something about that name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is tendancy to try to hump sunbathing women why you hate me?
      -psychologist

      (seriously, people, you all sound like a debate between zippy and psychologist in the eMacs OS)

    5. Re:Something about that name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psychologist? Sounds like Eliza to me.

    6. Re:Something about that name... by infolation · · Score: 1

      Only when using the optional 'Imitation Rod Hull Attatchment Arm' round its waist.

      The packing comes with a 'chatshow host advisory warning' sticker too.

    7. Re:Something about that name... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Sounds like crosstalk on the satellite mind control network. You're getting somebody's porn feed. I recommend you adjust your tinfoil hat, It is wired to a six foot copper stake driven into the ground, right?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  6. Segway wheels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why did we hear no hyperbole from Steve Jobs prior to this?

  7. Why don't we have a robotics industry? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I know we have robotics research etc, but shouldnt we has a "technologoical" economy be revealing our own robots?

    1. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. Imagine how much faster things would be if I could go to a McDonalds, punch in what I wanted on the screen, swipe my card, and wait for the robots to put the food together. You could reduce the staff of such an operation from ten people to two, and the food quality would be identical. Of course, this would also be upfront cost for the companies, and would hurt the economy undoubtedly as it would require the firing of multiple thousands of people, but we'd have a progress in technology.

      I guess to sum it up best, I WANT MY DAMNED FLYING CAR.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      I know we have robotics research etc, but shouldnt we has a "technologoical" economy be revealing our own robots?

      Between our high schools, wal-marts, liberal media, conservative media, etc. - we are churning out robots by millions.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    3. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by UWC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Back in the mid/late '90s, there was a Taco Bell near me that installed touch screen ordering stations. You'd get your receipt with a number on it, and a few minutes later you'd hear your number called and maybe barely glimpse a human figure darting back behind the large wall that completely obscured the kitchen area. Then you'd retrieve your order from the very small counter where your food had been placed. In retrospect it was an odd clinical dehumanization of something still carried out by humans. Unless there were robots back there, I guess, one of which was dressed in a purple shirt and a wig.

    4. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1
      Between our high schools, wal-marts, liberal media, conservative media, etc. - we are churning out robots by millions.


      Ab-so-fucking-lutely.

    5. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      What liberal media?

    6. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by Animats · · Score: 1
      McDonalds had a big kitchen-automation effort a few years ago. But when wages came back down after the boom, they didn't need it.

      Their latest idea is to outsource the drive-through talker. The drive-through intercom will be remoted to an offsite location, where the order will be keyed into the kitchen computer network.

      If we had a $15/hr minimum wage, we'd see far more robotics and automation. But what would we do with all the excess people? We tried this.

    7. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      Food quality identical? What kind of crappy robots are you suggesting they use? If they were to use anything with any degree of reliability it should be better

    8. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, there's one of those robots right there for ya, Em.

    9. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      In retrospect it was an odd clinical dehumanization of something still carried out by humans.

      In montreal there is a movie theatre where the cashiers are hidden away in a small room and what you interact with is their image and sound on a round screen.

      I hate that place.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    10. Re:Why don't we have a robotics industry? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Oh man, the Taco Bell near my place gets my drive-thru order wrong about 1 time out of 3...I wish I could just type in my order. The biggest problem I see is that rapid turnover makes the newbies unfamiliar with the menu.

      There also have been trials to outsource the drive-thru ordering of several fast food locations into a single call center (US based, for now...)

  8. This is all fine... by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... as long as they don't enslave humans in order to protect them and make a cyborg with prejudice for robots our only hope of freedom.

    Ah, and rape a fine writers' memory in the process!

  9. Oooh by Robotron23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It bears a likeness to R2-D2...

    Now all they need to do is affix a gin & tonic brewer...

  10. Wheel feet resemble bottom half of segway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Would that be the wheel part?

    1. Re:Wheel feet resemble bottom half of segway? by UWC · · Score: 1
      Would that be the wheel part?

      I figured it was the "only two parallel wheels with no other visible means of support" part.

  11. I think the saddest part about this... by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that the only companies willing to do any practical research in robotics is car companies because they use robotics on such a daily basis (the building of cars, of course).

    Not only that, robotics is one of the most fun branches of modern computing and engineering, and yet so few engineers actually go into it. It's a shame we aren't meeting up with more robots in real life (Fast foods should be relegated to robotics by now, as the food quality tends to resemble it)...

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, i find these robot anouncements by major electronic companies pure PR moves. Yes, they look cool and can do nifty things - but they aren't much good for anything else. We're still a far cry away from humanoid robots to become common, and, more important, useful.

      Specialized robots, like you mentioned, it's a whole different deal, and i agree. Automatized construction is the only industry i can think of that invest heavily in robotic research - we could use specialzed robots elsewhere.

    2. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the coolest specialized robots I've seen to date is the robot that's going to be installed here at the University of Louisville as soon as they complete the renovation of the Library building. (Search for Robotic Retrieval System on your favorite search engine).

      Basically it's going to be a robot to retrieve books in the library, allowing the books to be packed denser on the shelves, thus boosting the capacity of our Library by 1.2M books. This kind of technology is amazing, and we should be finding ways to push it into our lives for much more general work than that. Robotics research shouldn't have to be done by the car companies of the world.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you dug beneath your house and found a 50 year old record player the size of a kitchen, with support for 1.2M records and a giant mechanical arm that could access these tightly packed records autmatically, would you think it was a good idea? No. You'd laugh and think "I can't believe people actually used this shit!". You'd have a joke about it with your friends, submit a story about it to /. and get on with your life.

      Well my friend, that's what your new library system is like at the University of Louisville. Enjoy it while it works, I guess.

    4. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      I would think it's a marvelous idea since the system's designed to store older books that are currently sitting in back rooms in card board boxes.

      Sure, I'd love to see them digitized just as would anyone, but it's just not practical as of yet, where handwriting recognition software isn't quite where it needs to be, and a lot of these books need special treatment that a robot could provide a lot easier than a human could.

      And if I dug under my kitchen and found it... There'd be a lot more fuss about it than a /. article...

      Why the fuck did I just waste my time replying to an AC?

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    5. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast foods should be relegated to robotics by now

      I realize that you were, sorta, joking here, but keep in mind that the ff industry employs a significant # of people, and having them all replaced would put a significant strain on social systems already maxed out. I think this is one of the reasons you DON'T see more robots in places that you COULD see robots even today (after all, is there really a technical reason many FF places couldn't be automated today in a cost effective manner?)

    6. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Umm no. It costs a shitload more money to automate the FF industry than it does to hire untrained labor. There's an endless supply of 16 year old kids, why would you want to put a significant investment into making robots that you then need to maintain.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by omahajim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Allowing the books to be packed denser on the shelves? You mean they're not already stacked side by side? Or, do you mean that they're getting rid of those pesky wide aisles that humans need to navigate among the stacks?

    8. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitachi cars are the best!

    9. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by pixel+fairy · · Score: 1

      after all, is there really a technical reason many FF places couldn't be automated today in a cost effective manner?

      because i wanted that well done and without the mayo

    10. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Because 16yo kids are inherently unreliable. For example, I quit going to my local BK because 3 out of my last 4 times there, I ordered a burger with "no mayo". The first 2 time I was a couple miles away when I discovered the burger absolutely slathered in that vile substance. The last time I went in and complained to the manager. Since then, I haven't had the willingness to bother going back.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    11. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that because you're a big cry baby people are going to shell out billions of dollars in research to produce robots that are magically going to be more reliable.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by spankey51 · · Score: 1

      That reminds me: http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm

      --
      -ubuntu others as you would have others ubuntu you.
    13. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by WomensHealth · · Score: 1

      American robotics research is focused more on military applications, while the Japanese seem to be more focused on creating robots for consumer and industrial use. We don't hear as much about them as we do about Qrio et al, but projects like Boeing's X-45 UCAV http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/x-45/ flash.html/ are being agressively pursued, you can bet. These robots can't walk and talk, but they can fly and drop bombs, and eventually will be able to do so semi- or fully autonomously.

    14. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by anagama · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry - are you saying that a business that provides crappy service should continue to get my patronage? There's a restaruant near my office I frequent regularly. I get exactly what I want whenever I go there, even if it means substituting X side dish for Y side dish. Why do I keep going back to the tune of $50/wk? Because I get what I want, the owners are nice and friendly to me, and the food is good. Why do I refuse to go to the BK I mentioned? Because somehow, when I go there I get EXACTLY the opposite of what I want.

      Now, a savy business owner will realize that happy customers keep coming back, and customers who get what they want are going to be happy. If a robotic assembly process would provide customers with what they want, spending the money on the machinery is a hell of a lot better than going out of business because you have no customers. In that case, as long as the return excedes the investment, it doesn't matter how much it costs.

      Besides, robotic burger assembly will be the least of their uses. It might just be a happy side effect.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    15. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What I'm saying is that millions and millions of us go to fast food places every day, get shit service, and just don't care. So why the hell should the fast food industry give a shit that you can't get with the program?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    16. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Is that the only companies willing to do any practical research in robotics is car companies because they use robotics on such a daily basis (the building of cars, of course).

      I wish they'd make robot cars. Then we could walk around safe in the comfort of knowing that cars have been given a survival instinct and they won't let drunk people make them swerve into pedestrians and whatnot.

      But I figure that the Detroit business men got put off the whole robotics thing by Robocop. I mean, come on, who do you think they identified with when they watched that movie? (Someone who gets fired and then shot by Robocop, that's who ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    17. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm slow to get it -- I'm thinking now you are making a joke. If so, it is rather amusing.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    18. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      No. I really am that cynical. People buy fast food cause they want to pay little and eat fast. They're fat and lazy and don't care if they get bad service and bad health. You obviously do care, so feel free not to participate in the fast food epidemic, but the rest of the population will gladly continuing buying terrible food prepared by wage slaves. How does this relate to robots? Well your theory is that for some reason corporations will replace the employees with robots because they do a better job. I'm telling you that they will do no such thing because they don't care how shit a job their employees do.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    19. Re:I think the saddest part about this... by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You've highlighted one of the major obstacles to automation (including but not limited to robotics). When the 16yo behind the counter screws-up your order, you will get irritated, and might complain to the manager (unless you went through the drive-through, TFYATDT). We demand an inhuman (literally) level of performance/consistency from automated systems.

      About 20,000 Americans are killed every year in automobile accidents. If we introduced automated cars that could get you where you want to go with no human control, and they killed 5,000 people per year, we would be demanding that these things be banned (and the lawsuits would flow like spice). Better isn't good enough; we demand perfect, even in non-mission-critical systems.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  12. So life-like... by mfender9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously much effort has been put into making this as closely resemble us wheeled humanoids as possible. Hitachi, I applaud you!

    1. Re:So life-like... by marshall_j · · Score: 1

      If i had my way it would look just like Johnny 5.

      Then it could do all that cool stuff with it's eyebrows :D

    2. Re:So life-like... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      The laser. We want the laser aswell!

    3. Re:So life-like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eyebrows > laser cannon.
      "Don't worry, my uncle was a Harley-Davidson."

  13. I've seen something like this. by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Interesting
    During a brief sojourn to Japan a couple of years back, there was a music store that had a robotics theme.

    Very little stock was on hand, but you would select the music you wanted on one of the robots. It'd burn the audio CD, print up the liner, and assemble a shrink-wrapped product for a couple of yen more than one you'd get off the shelf, then dance around the room playing the biggest hit off the album.

    The experience would only have been cooler if it could talk with you, although the sushi-dispensing robots did have a few stock phrases and voice recognition (you had to shout for them to hear you however).

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:I've seen something like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.


      Actually, that was Yoda in Empire Strikes Back.

    2. Re:I've seen something like this. by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Funny

      "although the sushi-dispensing robots did have a few stock phrases and voice recognition"

      I bet that the 'used womens panties' vending machine would be the one with the most interesting conversation...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:I've seen something like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His sig is a blatant troll, don't encourage him.. :-p

  14. Re:Robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on whether you have stairs in your house.

  15. We will be robot soon. by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    The cyberthalamus is coming soon.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
  16. Robot on a segway by mzwaterski · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Its a robot on a segway...

    I like the idea, but does it fall over and break when the batteries die? Are they going to add a third wheel for safety reasons. (LOL)

    1. Re:Robot on a segway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it falls a lot they could call it G.W.

    2. Re:Robot on a segway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it makes lame jokes, they could call it "Anonymous Coward"

  17. Terrible secrets of space by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "I will protect you from the terrible secrets of space. ...do you have stairs in your house?!"

    *Pusher and Shover robot*

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Terrible secrets of space by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Terrible secrets of space by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Unless it is Beowulf Clusters of endless robot armies of a woman scorned.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    3. Re:Terrible secrets of space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am protected.

    4. Re:Terrible secrets of space by eexlebots · · Score: 1

      but will it say what is in my sig:

      --
      ***
    5. Re:Terrible secrets of space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet korea, only old lady robots who look like jakov dump hot grits down YOUR pants!

    6. Re:Terrible secrets of space by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Based on a Futurama quote.

      "Hell hath
      no fury like the vast robot armies of a woman scorned"

      I couldn't remember the whole thing when I typed it in from memory.

  18. What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm not robotics expert, I'm just an engineering student, but it seems to me that humanoid robots are a sort of marketing victory more than being a genuine breakthrough.

    Most industrial robots I've seen don't need a humanoid form at all, and I can imagine several cases were the humanoid form is actually an impairment to getting work done. Why not go with more structurally efficient designs, like a spider, instead of focusing on bipedal bots for uses requiring ambulation?

    --

    Software piracy is victimless theft.

    1. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by isometrick · · Score: 1

      Because that would be scary ... ok? Thanks.

    2. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by e2d2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not go with more structurally efficient designs, like a spider, instead of focusing on bipedal bots for uses requiring ambulation?

      As long as it has a face I can punch I don't care what shape it comes in.

      But in all seriousness I do agree, the quest for human shaped robots is intriguing. We are obviously not the most able bodied creatures when it comes to our "form factor", our superiority is not in our shape but in our huge monkey brain.

      Maybe it's to out people at ease, but I for one do _not_ welcome our new humanoid robot overlords. It creeps me out when things that don't have a soul start talking to me. Call me crazy.

    3. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by jjthe2 · · Score: 0

      Because when Cyberdyne sends a robot assassin back in time to kill our leader, it needs to look like us so it can fit in and gain our trust.

    4. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by hauntedspaceship · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because our environment is designed and optimized for humans. By creating robots that resemble us (same actuators (hands), ability to understand and speak our language, see what we can see), then they already can operate in our environment.

      There is also the idea of robot-human interaction: would you rather interact with Asimo or a spider?

    5. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by utexaspunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      because what they want to move toward are all-purpose robots capable of serving in a variety of environments shared with humans. most of these environments are currently designed for humans. obviously the best form factor for maneuvering such an environment and manipulating objects designed for humans would be that of a human.

      that, and they look way cool...

    6. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by kid-noodle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asimov gives a good argument for humanoid robots in Caves of Steel - namely economy.

      Do you buy a robot cooker, microwave, eggbeater etc. etc. Or a robot that can use the tools already?

      --
      fortune -o
    7. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Pyromage · · Score: 1

      Not because we want humanoid robots as such; there is some use for them, of course, but you're right: they aren't the solution to all problems.

      However, many of the problems involved in making a bipedal robots are the same problems you get in other areas. For instance, I suspect that the problems in making a robot walk on two legs are present to some extent in making a 4 or 8 legged robot. That is, while we can make an 8 legged robot now, if we knew how to make a 2 legged one, we could probably make a better 8 legged one.

      That's the first example that comes to mind; it's rather silly because you could just start with the 8-legged robot and make it better on its own. But I think it serves to illustrate the idea, at least.

      At least, this is why I like humanoid robots.

    8. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be SkyNet? CyberDyne as a corporation had ceased to exist by 2029.

    9. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      like a spider, instead of focusing on bipedal bots for uses requiring ambulation

      If controlling two legs is complex then controlling eight should be a snap right? Please...

    10. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anything with six or more legs always has a stable centre-of-gravity, and doesn't have to worry about maintaining a stable configuration. With three or four legs, you have unstability as soon as you take one leg off the ground. With only two legs, you always have unstability and need sophisticated real-time circuitry to maintain balance.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by VoidWraith · · Score: 2, Informative

      For walking, it is. With two you have to deal with vast amounts of balance problems, and its not easy to correct. With eight (or six, or four) you can move a pair of legs without having to worry about stability, because it still has all the rest to fall back on. Controlling the legs isn't the complex part, the motions for walking on two legs are vastly complex compared to simple patterns for four, six, and eight.

    12. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uh huh, Chobits would have been a very different story if Chi had been a giant spider.

      "Hideki, you are the one just for me!"

      "Oh for the love of God NO!!!! Aaaaaggghhhhhhh!!!"

    13. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 2, Funny
      It creeps me out when things that don't have a soul start talking to me. Call me crazy.

      Ever met a lawyer?

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    14. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      So what is wrong with a spider type robot? So long as they are not more than a foot square and more than 6 feet tall they should have no problem with the vast majority of houses, and it is a lot easier for them to keep their balance when there are always plenty of legs on the ground.

      I want a robot in my house to clean my house. I don't care if it is an ugly thing, because I want to set it to wake up at 8am and vacuum the stairs (seriously, the stairs in my house are my biggest regular maintenance headache, I can handle the rest of the work myself, though of course the more the robot does the better). Only the cats will see it.

    15. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Well most people I know have a robot to wash their dishes. It doesn't use the tools you have already, but instead requires its own custom interface to the house. People don't have a problem with it though.

    16. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      There is actually one thing we do better than any animal. We throw. No other animal is capable of throwing anything as far or as accurately as we are, and that's not just from a big-brained standpoint.

      It's almost like we're spear and rock-chucking machines.

      There are other benefits to being bipedal. With two legs we can squeeze through smaller spaces than we could if we had four or eight. We're one of the only mammals that is exclusively bipedal. Even gorillas walk with their arms. We'd probably have the highest typing rate of all of the animals (if stupid PETA would allow me to continue my research). The physical feats that skateboarders do in half-pipes are comparable to the impressive physical feats other animals are capable of. Or, say, the russian balancing acts at Cirque de Solei.

      Compared to other animals, the human physical form is incredibly flexible. Don't knock it just because the grass looks greener.

    17. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      can a spider-type robot be tall enough to reach overhead cabinets and high shelves, small enough to fit through a doorway and share a room with humans, fast enough to keep up with a normal walking human, and still be agile enough to scale stairs and navigate a room full of junk on the floor?

      and is vacuuming all you can think of for a robot to do? i want mine to do my laundry, do the dishes, go shopping for me, cook, and clean the rest of my house. everything one used to keep a woman for (aside from sex, although i'm sure some /.ers would be okay with robot sex, too...)

    18. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "Asimov gives a good argument for humanoid robots in Caves of Steel - namely economy."

      If I remember correctly, Asimov's primary reason for using the human shape was that it was the most successful and adaptable shape in nature. Economy was secondary.

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    19. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It doesn't use the tools you have already, but instead requires its own custom interface to the house. People don't have a problem with it though."

      Because there's no alternative. I don't remember seeing the humanoid robot at the electrical store when I went shopping for my dishwasher.

    20. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Vacuuming stairs is the killer app that I most want now. My front door is at the bottom of a flight of stairs, so every time I come in I'm tracking mud up the stairs. (I can take my shoes, off, the cat can't)

      I can buy a good enough dish washer. Sure I'd prefer if it would take my dishes off the table, clean them, and put them away, but what we have works. Likewise my laundry machines do most of the hard work without me worrying. I'd like them to do more, but I don't need it now.

      The hard part about shopping is figuring out what I need, and if the in store specails are worth changing my meal plans.

      I don't see a point in a robot that can keep up with me. I don't see the point in a companion, (though this is apparently a hot market in Japan) my dog does just find in that area. (And once in a while I use real people for that...) I want a slave.

      I don't care how you design the robot. I don't really want to think about it or see it. I just want it to do the work I don't like to do. A spider design is much easier to make work (no balance problems), which is the only reason I suggest it.

    21. Re:What's the big deal about humanoid robots? by korekrash · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons for humanoid robots would be to allow the robots to do things that will commonly be done by humans also. By giving the robot a humanoid form, the robot would be able to use most equipment that is designed for humans. In order to make robots a part of everyday life, they will have to be able to do things using human equipment. If your "Robot Chef" is in for repair, you still want to be able to open the refrigerator door to get something to eat. If the robot chef used a specific appendage to access a latch that is not accessible to humans, you would starve! So, if you want your robot to make cars or PCB's, your probably not wanting a humanoid; if you want a robobutler to do things for you around the house, a humanoid would be advantageous..... -kk

  19. Ok so what are these good for. by Dimentox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can it do my laundry? Can it Walk the dog? Can it cook my meals? Hrmm... Guess its not a replacement for Wife 1.0, I never shoulda upgraded in the first place.

    --
    string sig = llGetSig("dimentox"); llSay(0,sig);
    1. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Laundry, no. But you could probably attach a buggy to it and have it carry it for you.

      Walk the dog? Sure! Attach the leash to the unit and let it pull.

      Cook your meals? Perhaps if it were modified with a flipper arm and a dunking arm, and a voice module to say "Would you like fries with that?"

      It may not be up to part for Wife 1.0, but hell if it isn't a good pet ;).

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Can it do my laundry? Can it Walk the dog? Can it cook my meals? Hrmm... Guess its not a replacement for Wife 1.0, I never shoulda upgraded in the first place."

      Being an early adopter is hell. I still haven't gotten any calls on my video phone. I ended up rerouting my cable to it so I could pretend celebrities are calling.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      If you're already at the point where you refer to your wife in version numbers, prepare for Wife 2.0, 3.0, 3.1 and 3.11 For Workgroups.

    4. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Can it do my laundry? Can it Walk the dog? Can it cook my meals? Hrmm... Guess its not a replacement for Wife 1.0, I never shoulda upgraded in the first place.

      I was going to break your heart and let you in on something ELSE that robot can't do with you, but then I realized you said WIFE 1.0 and not GIRLFRIEND 1.0, so the point is likely moot?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by anagama · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you control the power switch, it will be a huge upgrade from Wife 1.0.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    6. Re:Ok so what are these good for. by JargonScott · · Score: 1

      Wow, even Dilbert posts to Slashdot.

      --
      Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
  20. Slow Learners by hopbine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    could be "trained" for practical office and factory use in as little as five to six years. Or is this how long it normally takes.....

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
    1. Re:Slow Learners by raider_red · · Score: 1

      We had an intern a few years ago who wasn't nearly as useful. I figured training him to do light office work would probably take about nine or ten years.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  21. all is fine but... by same_old_story · · Score: 1

    ok the bots are cool. very cool.
    but when will carmakers use all this tech they are apparently researching into actual cars .
    fact is, we've been driving (almost) the same old pieces of junk.
    cars should improve much faster than they have been.
    we are waiting.

    yes yes, the robots are cool.

    1. Re:all is fine but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT CAR MAKERS!

    2. Re:all is fine but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT??!? CAR MAKERS!!!!!!

  22. Humanoid robots? by e2d2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since when did humanoids have wheels?

    Damn I'm behind, I gotta get rid of these stupid legs.

    UPGRADE

    1. Re:Humanoid robots? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      In case of sonic attack, use your wheels, it is what they are for.

      If wheels are not available metal, not organic, limbs should be used whenever possible.

      Remember, survival means every man for himself.
      You can help noone else.
      Do not panic.

      (and if anyone recognises that reference, I'll put them on my 'friends' list).

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Humanoid robots? by advid.net · · Score: 1
      Insightful.

      I also agree: * THIS IS NOT HUMANOID *

      It was my first reaction when I saw the robot, so I search the discussion until I found your post (I don't want to be redundant)

      It seems almost no readers noticed that this humanoidism claim is unjustified.

  23. It has to be said... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new office work performing over-

    Awe, crap, who am I kidding? I'm going to be freakin' outsourced to one of these little @#$@#$ers...

    DIE, YOU LITTLE ROTTER! R2D2 WAS TWICE THE BOT YOU WILL EVER BE!

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  24. Why robot research is wasteful by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Japan is pouring billions into robotic software research in part because they don't allow much immigration and migrant workers, and thus want to develop robots to fill those niches instead.

    However, rather than build an artificial brain, it appears more cost effective and closer to improve the bandwidth costs so that such bots can be controlled from low-wage nations. We don't need artificial intelligence because there are billions of idle human brains around the planet.

    I suppose one could argue that remote-control servants could end up causing malice, but artificial alternives may do the same either because AI might go bizerk, or more likely because it is not good enough yet and will make stupid mistakes.

    In short, remote-controll appears the more reachable goal at this stage. Bandwidth cost reduction does not appear to need the giant breakthrus that AI does.

    1. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see you have never managed people before.

    2. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by Grunhund · · Score: 1

      Actually, the japanese are more concerned about having the robots as companions then as servents. The dream appears to be something along the lines of astro-boy. Look at some of the commercials for sony's humanoid. It is being marketed as a companion for the elderly and lonely. Westerners are more concerned with having the robotic domestic slave.

    3. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by bar-agent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the japanese are more concerned about having the robots as companions then as servents. ... Look at some of the commercials for sony's humanoid. It is being marketed as a companion for the elderly and lonely. Westerners are more concerned with having the robotic domestic slave.

      I think there are actually three categories of robots: child-like, adult, and non-humanoid. Real robots are either child-like and Japanese, or non-humanoid and American. I do not know if it was intentional, but your comment seems to be saying that Americans want slavery and the Japanese want companionship. This is not the case. Based on what is out there now, Americans want tools and the Japanese want companions.

      If an American company did really come out with an interactive adult humanoid robot, like the NS-1 from the "I, Robot" movie, I think it would not sell too well. Americans, at least me and my friends, are uncomfortable with servants. If someone is getting paid to do a job, that is one thing, but a servant class is bad. We would be compelled to treat an interactive adult humanoid robot like one of a) an equal, b) a friend who helps you out, or c) a tool. And if we treat it as a tool, it had better not look too human or be too personable. Nothing else would be comfortable. Look at the relationship between Luke and C-3PO, or between Picard and Data.

      The Japanese seem to be pushing child-like humanoid robots for companionship. I can see this; child-like humanoids are not expected to be equals of anybody. It is okay if they are limited. But these robots will never do well in the States, because they rely on being cute to offset their simplicity, and in the States, cute things are creepy.

      Look at the Hitachi robot from the article. Anybody else find the styling a little off-putting? I know I did. It looked like a kid, but wasn't. In Japan, cute or child-like things with special powers, such as Pikachu, Astroboy, or magical children, are okay. But the closest equivalents in the U.S. are things like Gremlins, Children of the Corn, Chuckie, or Barney. Cute things with special powers are creepy over here. It would be difficult to market such a thing for home companionship.

      It seems to me, that in Japanese culture, a general-purpose humanoid robot must be harmlessly cute to be accepted, whereas in American culture, a general-purpose humanoid robot must be seen to be satisfied with its duties and treatment.

      But maybe I'm biased.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    4. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

      I thought the Japanese put a lot of money into robots because they think robots are really fucking cool.

      DJCC.

    5. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I can see you have never managed people before.

      You get what you pay for. If the money to the offshore controllers is good (comparatively), they usually won't risk pissing off their client.

    6. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by danila · · Score: 1

      Do not overgeneralize. For example, Sony has Aibos with very different designs, from cute (ERS-31*) to high-tech (AIBO ERS-210) to sci-fi (ERS-220).

      The difference is not in marketing, it's in the lack of foresight American corporations have. American will use robots just as well as everyone else, only it will be Japanese robots.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by albanac · · Score: 1
      If an American company did really come out with an interactive adult humanoid robot, like the NS-1 from the "I, Robot" movie, I think it would not sell too well. Americans, at least me and my friends, are uncomfortable with servants. If someone is getting paid to do a job, that is one thing, but a servant class is bad. We would be compelled to treat an interactive adult humanoid robot like one of a) an equal, b) a friend who helps you out, or c) a tool. And if we treat it as a tool, it had better not look too human or be too personable.

      This is explored at length in 'Satisfaction Guaranteed', 'Galley Slave', 'Little Lost Robot' (the origin of the Nestor designation, the NS-2 series of robots), and various other stories by Isaac Asimov. It is discussed most explicitly during "Robots and Empire" when two Spacer scientists are discussing the discontinuation of a line of fully humanoid, as in indistinguishably humanoid, robots orginally made for planetary exploration. Asimov did not perceive it as being unique to Americans, so much as that the closer mechanical humans came to being indistinguishable from real ones, the more uncomfortable real ones would get.

      Bladerunner has, if you think about it, rather the same theme. As do many other "Robot as Menace" (to use Asimov's categorization) stories from the 60s and 70s.

      ~cHris
    8. Re:Why robot research is wasteful by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I bet the ERS-31s sell better in Japan, the ERS-210s sell better here, and the ERS-220 sells as a niche product.

      I'm not saying Americans won't use advanced humanoid robots (which, as you say, are likely to be Japanese). I'm just saying that Americans have different criteria for acceptibility, and different purposes in mind. The Japanese are more likely to buy "your plastic pal who's fun to be with," than we are.

      And I figure the reason we have different purposes, the reason Americans won't buy robot companions, but will buy robot toys/pets, is because we can't handle something who will serve us without getting anything out of it.

      Of course, I am a cat person, because dogs don't seem to have any dignity and self-respect like I think they should. So maybe a dog person wouldn't have a problem with robots? I dunno...

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  25. Holding office by Onan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I first misread the summary as, "...has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for political office use..."

    (Of course, my first thought was that that's vastly overqualified for what it apparently takes to be elected President these days.)

  26. Down? Now what? by Tackhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    > > "First one down a flight of 100 steps *intact* wins."
    >
    > So what do the rules of this competition say about winning? Would that be "to move down the steps fastest", or would they allow "to fall down in the shortest possible time, and built strong enough to survive the impact?"

    One hundred stairs de-scended!

    We are the su-perior being!

    We have e-merged victorious!

    EX-TERM-I-aaw, FUCK..

    (Not my photoshop. Original at bottom of http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=1419. And as my desktop wallpaper.)

  27. Blimey! by payndz · · Score: 1

    Any 2000AD reader would recognise that as an ancestor of foul-mouthed sanitation droid Ro-Jaws! Hammerstein surely can't be far off...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  28. Re:What is it with Slashdot? by cartel · · Score: 0

    That's why there's politics.slashdot.org, science.slashdot.org, and it.slashdot.org.

  29. I found myself wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the bottom half goes 3.7MPH, how fast does the top half go?

  30. Actually... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To me, the saddest part about all this is that the only companies willing to do any practical research in robotics are Japanese car companies because they look farther into the future than the next quarterly earnings report. The Japanese car companies are pumping R&D dollars into developing new technologies that will help them in the long run. The American car companies are taking that money and pumping it into bonuses for CEOs so they can buy a new ivory backscracther every year.

    Face it, we just don't have the drive to improve that companies in other countries do.

    GMD

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, those crazy Japanese CAR companies.

      If you'll excuse me, I have to return my Sony rental car and pick up my Hitachi at the body shop.

    2. Re:Actually... by Grunhund · · Score: 1

      The Japanese are the one doing the research partly beacuse the west and particularly the US seem to have some sort of taboo about humanoid robot research. Perhaps it is some religious qualm or too many terminator movies but generally thier humanoid robots are from the torso up or torso down so as not to be too humanlike...

    3. Re:Actually... by vikstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, the saddest part is that they call a robot on wheels humanoid. Excuse me, but being a researcher in robots, if it doesn't have two legs, its not humanoid.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese cars are better now, so maybe the long term has been paying off for them the whole time...

      Oh, and what you describe sounds like Microsoft in general. Innovate? Not us, we "embrace and extend" someone else's work.

    5. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but being a researcher in robots, if it doesn't have two legs, its not humanoid.

      Suppose you were involved in a horrific accident at your research lab in which one of your robots sliced off your legs. Would you no longer be humanoid?

    6. Re:Actually... by danila · · Score: 1

      In 1970 Japan ran their first technology foresight exercise. Several thousands of scientists, engineers and experts participated in a two-round Delphi study. The study attempted to predict the scientific and technological developments in the next 30 years. It led to the huge R&D push in the fields of 5th-generation computers, artificial intelligence and robotics.

      For the curious, Japan runs its foresight projects every 5 years, so you can learn about technology that Japan will have in 2030 here. The reports are pretty damn accurate, with at least 80% of predicted developments coming to fruition.

      The next country to introduce regular foresight exercises was, of course the Soviet Union, which started them in 1971. With more than 4% of the GDP spent on scientific research (higher than USA, Japan or any other country), it was at the forefront of the scientific and technological races.

      The United States, however, mostly used such exercises in the military. Air Force, Navy and the Army used them to foresee, which technologies to kill people will be available in the future, and invest in them. The government and American corporations were largely uninterested in the foresight results. Consequently, corporations are largely preoccupied with short-term, although it is gradually changing because of the breathtaking pace of progress. Noone can ignore it anymore, not even American corporations.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:Actually... by feronti · · Score: 1

      What's really sad is that here, at a school (University of Michigan--Dearborn) that was founded specifically to train engineers for the Big 3 (Ford especially... they put up most of the original money for the University and granted the land to build it), we don't have a DARPA Grand Challenge team. In fact, nobody around here seems to have even heard of it. Instead, our big project from the Auto Companies is GM's ChallengeX--a competition to turn an existing vehicle into a hybrid. Exciting. Or rather it would have been 5 years ago, before somebody else did it!.

    8. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. was not interested in Forsight results as oppose to the Soviet Union and Japan which took them more seriously?

      Okay, tell me where it matters. The Soviet Union is dead. I am old enough to remember predictions of Japan supplanting the U.S. economically. That has turned out to be bunk. If anything the U.S. has increased its economic lead over the Japanese.

      The United States leads the world in basic research. American universities pump out advances and discoveries at an unabated rate.
      The American government invest tens of billions on basic research. The Bush administration has funded billions for hydrogen fuel cells, stem cell research (on existing lines), nanotechnology initiative to name three.

      This meme about the U.S. letting the rest of the world go by it is old. And wrong.

    9. Re:Actually... by isil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...or perhaps it has something to do with the UAW?

    10. Re:Actually... by danila · · Score: 1

      Well, first let's get the obvious stuff out of the way. US GDP is 11 trillion, which is more than 3 times greater than that of Japan. I didn't mention it, but the general science policy of the US was formed under the influence of the belief that it can lead the world in every area, so no priorities were set at all. This, incidentally, is no longer true and US science (and its international cooperation programs) suffers a little bit.

      In any case, R&D policy is not the only factor. But all other things equal, the country with a smarter R&D policy benefits. Soviet Union had excellent science and education, but it suffered from administrative problems that led to a systemic crisis. Coupled with a loss of direction this was fatal. If the USSR didn't have such ambitious industrial and scientific policies from the very beginning, it wouldn't become a world superpower that it was. Unexpectedly, Russia now spends slightly above 1% of its (measly) GDP on science and thus will probably stay in the socio-economic shithole it is in now.

      The United States does lead the world in science, no doubt about that. But investing in nanotech and fuel and stem cells today is different from realising in 1980s that these things are going to be important and starting large research programmes then.

      The slightly speculative (but reasonable) idea is that had the US treated foresight projects differently, it would have a better situation in research, the status of scientists would be higher, kids would be more enthusiastic about a career in research, there would not be irrational fears of anything "unnatural", such as stem cells, cloning and genetic engineering, and overall the US would be a better place.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    11. Re:Actually... by vikstar · · Score: 1

      Suppose you were involved in a horrific accident at your research lab in which one of your robots sliced off your legs. Would you no longer be humanoid?

      I have never been, and am not humanoid. I am human. I may one day become humanoid if my brain is inserted into a humanoid. Call me new fashioned, but I would not call a painted face on a trashcan with wheels and a couple of arms - humanoid.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
  31. The end of the Microsoft Employee by bananahead · · Score: 3, Funny

    This will end the hiring of new employees at Microsoft. Just the fact that it moves AT ALL, much less 3.6 MPH will render the entire program management, middle management and test groups obsolete.

    --
    A most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is if they foul up there's no law against wacking them around a bit.
  32. I'm pretty sure Dean Kamen has a patent lock... by mikeophile · · Score: 1

    Two wheels, side-by-side and self-balancing is pretty much Dean's turf. I wonder if he licensed it to Hitachi. If so, go Dean. If not, Hitachi might have some 'splaining to do.

    1. Re:I'm pretty sure Dean Kamen has a patent lock... by jotux · · Score: 1

      Two wheeled balancing robots have been around many years before the segway....but I wonder if they are use segway technology anyways. Seems like it would be a reasonably reliabe system to build on.

  33. The problem with .... by LnxAddct · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem with these robots is how fragile they are. I havent physically seen the other two robots, but Honda's Asimo stays in a little closet when in the lab. Not your typical closet of course, but you get the idea. When in the lab, all you see are other cheaper parts of robots similar or duplicated from Asimo. All the work and main testing is done on these pieces (which makes sense). The thing that I don't like though, and many people don't realize, is that before Asimo is ever unveiled to the public, he undergoes at least 8 hours of configuration. This is each and every time, and then he can only run for maybe an hour and a half iirc. These robots certainly have a lot of potential, and one day possibly could do factory work, but right now the public is being mislead thinking we are further along then we really are. People see this robot and think it probably just walks around all day and they'd like one. There are certainly some huge milestones being made, but the most publically known robots are imho overhyped. I'm not being a pessimist, I would just like to see even more reasearch in humanoid robotics so we can have the future sooner rather then later. Even just a self configuring Asimo would be a huge step in the right direction.
    Regards,
    Steve

    1. Re:The problem with .... by exoir · · Score: 1

      Lighten up...they're not selling them. They're the equivalent of a concept car. Showing what can be done with current technology. Remember "Electro"? From an old Worlds Fair...his brain is bigger than yours you know.

    2. Re:The problem with .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >but Honda's Asimo stays in a little closet when in the lab

      So what you're saying then is Asimo needs to come out of the closet?

    3. Re:The problem with .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got to see a demo of a bunch of QRIO robots in Japan last Fall. There was a team of Sony engineers/programmers set up around the perimeter of the demo platform ready to catch the robots when they fell over... good thing because during the 15 minute demo they had to catch the robots a number of times. Contrast this to the RHex robots: tumbling down rock piles.

  34. R.U.R. Rossum's Universal Robots anyone?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    RUR is a german play whos script was published as a book. Its about how a company sold robots for work in factories and offices and as secretaries. It ended up destroying the earth.

    This just made me think of it, Great read!

  35. 6km/h by PxM · · Score: 1

    Hmm...I can still outrun that so I guess I don't have to welcome our new robotic overlords for a couple more months. We'll only have to start worrying if the robots can actually move fast enough to catch and enslave us.

    --
    Free iPod? Try a free Nintendo DS, GC, PS2, Xbox
    Wired article as proof

    1. Re:6km/h by Bit_Squeezer · · Score: 1

      Armed robots are scary no matter how slow. And ever more common.

  36. AWESOM-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey there have you heard about my robot friend?
    He's metal and small and doesn't judge me at all
    He's a cyber-wire bundle of joy
    My Robot Friend
    I like to tip and battle with my robot friend
    (just a guess, i couldnt tell what he said)
    BUTTERS: He's as smart as can be, and emotion free
    And he's computed his way to my heart
    My Robot Friend
    My Robot Friend
    My Robot Friend
    My Robot....friend." /vince

  37. Humanoid ?!?!? by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    Bugger me I must be deformed if thats what a humanoid looks like!

  38. Humanoid on wheels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "humanoid robot...which resemble the bottom half of a Segway scooter"

    Those Hitachi engineers must not meet many real humans.

  39. Segway Robotic Mobility Platform, or a clone? by javaxman · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know if it actually is the bottom half of a Segway, or if it's just a rip-off of Segway's tech?

    The bottom looks a bit different, so it's not directly what they show on the Segway RMP page. The robot also looks to have a left/right tilt feature which would be independant of the base... though it doesn't lean too much, so it might not be a significant difference.

    Are there any other english-language references to this thing? It must actually be news for a change, there appear to be only a handful of references to this thing in Google's cache, all on news websites.

  40. I for one... by kryogen1x · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...welcome our segway-like overlords.

  41. cool! by djfray · · Score: 1

    A robot helper that doesn't have to be operated by a team of a dozen or so scientist! I remember seeing an Asimo presentation at some museum, and they had asserted that it was autonomous(actually said it was "capable" of autonomous activity, with no proof) but required a team of learned individuals to perform menial tasks. not very efficient if you ask me

    --
    This sig is o Unfunny o Funny
  42. Why robot research is not wasteful by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    Because not doing research in order to give idle humans busy-work is retarded.

    BTW, it was a bit surreal to read the BBC quoting the robots in the article...

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    1. Re:Why robot research is not wasteful by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Because not doing research in order to give idle humans busy-work is retarded.

      I did not mean to suggest that it was necessarily for the betterment of the 3rd world. I am only saying it seems the more logical, or at least predictable, way to reach the stated goal.

  43. How long before they replace us? by yog · · Score: 1

    It's like Moore's law; every few years these robots will double in intelligence and capabilities until they exceed that of ordinary humans. They can already outplay us in chess. How much longer before they can replace your average bank teller or telemarketer or front line tech support? What about a restaurant table busser or dishwasher? Soon there will be nothing but robots in the workplace, plus a few human management types.

    In fact I can foresee a time when robots will be the managers. Unlike (some) humans they will have no compunctions about firing people who are inefficient, and they will not be compromised by, for example, sexual favors.

    I'm afraid.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    1. Re:How long before they replace us? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Actually, they can't really outplay us at chess.

      Note that the mechanism used to beat a human chess player was to consider literally billions of board combinations in each room, whereas even the best human chess master might only consider a few hundred combinations at most before he moves, and of those only analyze a handful to any great detail.

      If a computer only considered as many board moves as a real chess master, even *I* could probably beat it.

    2. Re:How long before they replace us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a good job in the IT field developing the robots. As for everyone else... they'll be pretty screwed.

    3. Re:How long before they replace us? by cgibbard · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I want to be able to walk about in places like Shinjuku and Shibuya [shopping districts] in the future without bumping into people and cars," Pal told reporters.

      Is it referring to motor control systems? Or something more sinister?

  44. Live and co-exist with people? by mark-t · · Score: 1
    It can't even climb a single flight of stairs.

    I'm reminded of the serious design flaw the original Daleks posessed.

    1. Re:Live and co-exist with people? by dahlek · · Score: 1

      Of course, the Daleks used slaves to overcome those difficulties... http://www.google.comfredthisisatest/meep

    2. Re:Live and co-exist with people? by dahlek · · Score: 1

      doh!

  45. No, no. They've done it all wrong... by derkyjadex · · Score: 1

    What they should have done is to give the robot non-functioning legs and put it in an electric wheelchair. If it ever runs out of power someone can push it around. Then when the robots become powerful they'll remember what we did for them.

    --
    Lift out of order. Bubble sort in progress.
  46. This is what i love by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    This is what I love about the japanese firms like this, that they do things mentioned in the article such as "They will try to out-do eachother with robots"

    These forward thinking and risk taking companies will make the world more what we see in Anime, and possibly end in the Great War.

    Realistically though, american companies did not recruit and employ young creative talent *AND* give them visible projects/influence over products as much as japanese companies have. While US firms would hire young engineers, they kept them chained to the roles of lowly interns, and by doing so have not allowed leaps in product creations.

    ** Disclaimer - based on my opinion.

  47. Good for you... by greppy · · Score: 1

    but what about the rest of the candy swilling population of Slashdot? We're screwed!

  48. co-exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We aimed to create a robot that could live and co-exist with people."

    If people can't live and co-exist with other people, what makes him think robots and people can live and co-exist?

  49. there's a lot of medical... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...robotics now. Here's a recent example.

  50. Amazing! by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 1

    The robot has a vocabulary of about 100 words and could be trained for practical office and factory use

    Wow, it's just like a chav.

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    1. Re:Amazing! by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      ..........except for the part about it being trained for practical use.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  51. im sorry... but by shrewd · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new extra mobile overlords...

  52. Upon the initial system boot.... by machinegunhand · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the robot used its limited vocabulary to ask who came up with the name "Emiew," followed by the words, "prepare to die."

  53. Wheels... whew by Illserve · · Score: 1

    I think it's very important that all robots be made with wheels.

    This way, no matter how badly things go with the laws of robotics we can just go up a flight of stairs to be safe.

    I'm glad to see they agree with me.

    1. Re:Wheels... whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the way, a feature not mentioned of the Emiew is that when worst comes to worst, it can flip over upside down and walk on its hands

  54. im starting an EMIEW farm.. by shrewd · · Score: 1, Funny

    i am an evil overlord, where can i pick up a fleet of these things?

  55. A Quiet Turing Test... by mindpixel · · Score: 1

    Looks like Emiew can nod its head...I'd love to stick GAC into this bot...1.4 million binary human propositions...Emiew would be very entertaining in a quiet Turing Test kind of way...

  56. Needs some work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their robot looks a little primitive compared to the other ones. But I'm glad there is a little competition. I saw Honda's ASIMO at the University of Minnesota. It's pretty impressive but they have a lot of work to do. Looking at Sony's website, their robot is equally impressive. Hopefully Honda, Sony, and now Hitachi keep pushing eachother to come out with new and better robots. Shouldn't be too long now until robots are common in homes and offices.

  57. You have been replaced by a small Perl script.... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Funny


    "You have been replaced by a small Perl script..."

    It's getting closer to reality. I can feel it.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  58. Wait a sec... Fastest? by kiddailey · · Score: 1


    It is a WHEELED robot and it can only go 3.7mph? I wouldn't be bragging about speed just yet.

    1. Re:Wait a sec... Fastest? by bdow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is faster. It all depends on what you mean when you say it's "the fastest robot to date."

  59. Robots that look like Humans? by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    I just want one that looks like R2-D2, that will follow me around to keep my Cold One's handy and chilled and within reach. If it can make sandwiches, all the better. That's all I need. No, I don't want it to play me Chess either.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  60. Bush by kai.chan · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder if they will implement a "Senior Transport" function for this robot. If so, then it would be an awesome feature, because I would get to see George Bush fall off of this one as well.

  61. Robot Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some friends that are terrified of robots after seeing movies like "I, Robot", where robots turn on their owners. It will be interesting to see if there will be a problem with robot spyware/malware/etc. Let's hope Microsoft is dead and gone by then.

  62. Related story by Spitfire75 · · Score: 1

    It's exactly what we're talking about here; it starts of with a fastfood chain that adopts a robotic manager, and ends up with most of humanity enslaved by robots. Pretty entertaining actually... http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm

    1. Re:Related story by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      very nice. Thanks for the link.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  63. Factory Use? by Zeussy · · Score: 1
    and could be trained for practical office and factory use
    For some small reason, I can't invisige any factory use for that robot at all. Although, You could build a factory around them, as they are only 1.3m tall. Have short benches and lowered bench drills, lathes, jigsawrs etc. And all these robots scootering around at 3.6mph drilling and sawing and making more of themselves! For the market of course, not so Hitachi can make an army and take over the world.
  64. Obligatory Comment by SilicaiMan · · Score: 1

    Nice ... but can it run Linux?

    1. Re:Obligatory Comment by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      No, it can run anything - it has wheels...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  65. Hyperboling Steves by dirkstoop · · Score: 1

    probably because he's not a segway enthousiast, whereas the Woz is. http://www.woz.org/seg/

    --
    (may read 'IMHO' wherever omitted from above text)
  66. WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hitachi Unveils Humanoid Robot ::looks down at hips::

    I don't have wheels!!!!

  67. Frack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run for the hills! Okay, they don't have pulsing red eye bands, but I'm not taking any chances!

    First wheels, then chrome, and soon they'll look like us with many copies! Run! RUN! RUUUUUUUNNNN...!!!!

  68. Yeah, but can it do my laundry? by otisg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Until it can get my groceries and do my laundry, I'm not buying! I already have a Rumba - it doesn't talk, but does a good job vacuuming.

    --
    Simpy
  69. obligtory... by Delta2.0 · · Score: 0

    But does it run linux?

  70. "wheel feet" by Scrameustache · · Score: 1



    They either mispelled "wheels" in a very contrived way or they are attempting to distract people from the fact that they can't do legs.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  71. Harder and less fun than you think by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    I spent quite a bit of time working in a university intelligent robotics lab... and while yes, its interesting work, it takes a special breed of person to really stick with it. Most work is very intensive and slow - implementing theories found in papers, performing simulations and what not. And at the moment, much of it is still focused on such basic tasks like having a robot know where it is given its sensory input (which is still extremely crude given the tools we have... the future is machine vision, and its going to take years to make it work).

    The other thing is that what you've been working on for the past 5 years may simply not work. Or a better theory might come along and render yours pointless.

    Only some of the research actually involves physical robots performing tasks. That's of course the final step in implementing a theory, and usually where you realize your theory isn't complete.

    I see this as a substantial difference between the US and japanese take on robotics. In the US, its very much research oriented at mostly universities and involves making robots more *intelligent*. In japan, much of the research is more focused on the physical controls. So what you get is, in the US labs we have lots of wheeled robots that are getting better at driving around intelligently, and in japan alot of robots are moving (even walking or running) with dexterity, but not very intelligently - by this i mean, they don't have much for sensory processing or localization. So while they might be building you a robot in japan that can wave hello and bring you breakfast, its not going to be much good if it doesnt realize how to get to the kitchen to make it and then get it back to you.

    This could be a simple business vs. academia thing - in business, a result is expected at some point. Deadlines and all. Building a physical machine is possible with that. But doing something that nobody really knows the right way to do (localization) has been under research for nearly 4 decades now and still has a long way to go.

    --

    -

  72. Re:R.U.R. Rossum's Universal Robots anyone?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German, German?!

    Well, congratulations, you have just made simplistic gyroscope out of Karel Chapeck in the grave...

  73. Mr. Jonny 5 by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    What do you call a machine with the body of a man, but the legs of a tank? i think everyone's tired of 'chimera' fever that swept through hollywood recently.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  74. Still needs artificial intelligence... by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 1

    I know how to write the program for artificial intelligence, but I'd like to keep the damn bots out of my pocket so I'm keeping it to myself. No one would want it anyway. They're programmed for peacetime.

  75. Yes but.. by Agarax · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can a beowulf cluster of these run Linux in Soviet Russia?

    Kinda like the XBot from Ctrl-Alt-Del

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
  76. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German, Czech - what's the difference for most of the world?
    R.U.R. is book written by czech author Karel Capek (lived in former Czechoslovakia before WWII). The word "robot" was invented and first used by him in that book. The word is based on term used for bond-service, so that the "robot" should mean something like non-human bond-slave.
    So much for the history :)

  77. Well, I never thought I'd be saying this.... by savage1r · · Score: 0

    but with 4.1 million robots projected to be doing work in peoples homes in the next year.... I for one welcome our new robot lords and pray that they are leniant in their treatment of their new human slaves. Pretty soon their brains will run on cell processors and then the all powerful skynet will go online and wipe out the bulk of humanity in one fowl swoop and usher in a post apocolyptic age where small communities of humans band together and try to rebuild the US by creating a system of post offices, the postmaster general known as "Snake" Plisken is on a mission to save the new president's daughter before 24 hours is up and he's fooled into thinking he has a deadly virus when he REALLY only has the flu for the second time.....I think I just wrote the next National Lampoon Apocolypse movie...did I leave out anything?

  78. You can see your wrong by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    If you just paid attention. The balancing problem has been solved. What has not been solved is the power requirement and mechincal complexity. Simply put more legs equals more mechanics AND increases power consumption.

    Balancing takes a lot of computer power while a multi legged construction can take all the time it needs to calculate the next move. However in the mean time computing power has improved so much that the problem has gone away.

    Hell, people even got lego to balance. Such a system is so much simpler you drastically increase reliabilty. That is the reason you see this robot with two wheels. It works and is simple.

    It is simply not true that multiple legs are easier to control. Balance is easier but moving is harder because you got to move more elements.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  79. Sigh, cnn watcher by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Here is a simple test, take that deep blue computer and replace the chessboard with a checkers board. Or a go board. Watch it flounder. I don't know kasparov but I am fairly certain that he would be able to cope JUST like every other non-retarded person in this world.

    That is intelligence. The capabilty to react to a constantly changing world.

    Humans can react to changing circumstances that are outside their current experiences. Basically they can react outside of their programming/training. Computers still cannot. If you really want to see how true this is go to a car plant. Plenty of robots AND plenty of people with the job of making sure the robots don't get confused. Or doing small tasks that require human intelligence.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  80. Obligatory AYB... by krunchyfrog · · Score: 1
    His first words were...

    All your base are belong to us.

    Then...

    You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  81. Robots can already run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years back I saw a segment on PBS which showed two-legged robots running at decent speeds. But they were connected to an AC power outlet, and weren't navigating obstacles.

  82. Rosie! by Beelub · · Score: 1


    It's Rosie, the Jetson's robot maid!

  83. misplaced effort by aoty · · Score: 1

    Man, why don't these scientists dudes stop concentrating on worthless stuff like increased vocabulary and mobility!?! The real money to be made is making these robots look like hot chicks. Intelligence means nothing when your robot has soft lucious ta-tas.

  84. Re:R.U.R. Rossum's Universal Robots anyone?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    R.U.R is not a German play, its Czech."Robot" is actually the Czech word for slave.

  85. It's a pity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that although Hitachi may be able to make robots they can't make hard disks that last longer than a week...

    for sale: one deskstar disk, some slight axe marks to casing

  86. Soul? by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

    What makes you think you have one or that robots don't? What do you mean by soul?

    1. Re:Soul? by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't an episode of Ghost in the Shell. I have a soul and robots don't. I'm gonna be the robot biggot 50 years from now oppressing them! Sit down machine and shut up! ;-)

      A soul is what made you ask that question in the first place. It's hard to define but you know it when you see it.

  87. THAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...right now the public is being mislead thinking we are further along then we really are.

    Can't you knuckleheads go one day without confusing then and than? They don't even sound the same!

  88. Is this a robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough with the remote control toys. This pushes the tecnological envelope. Autonomuous drones:

    http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/research/X45A/

  89. Mini version of this? by leinhos · · Score: 1

    While Googling for robotic applications for the gumstix sbc, I came across this guy's page. (actually, his new page is here.) Pretty cool. He's been designing and building a small 2-wheeled bot called the Belligerator that looks like a fun little project.