I did tell google they spelled their name wrong, I think that lead to the listing of "google" in the dictionary, to prove me "wrong". Ha, I said to them. Revisionists.
Either we trust the people running our elections or we don't.
There should inherently be distrust of our election officials, always every time, forever. If they cant stand an audit, they should not be there.
Ever sell a house? Escrow companies exist because there is something of value and in the transfer you cannnot trust always the other side. Which is exactly as it should be. Sell a car? Notice of transfer of liability. Why? Because you cant always trust the other party involved. Which is the way it should be. If you buy something you are issued a receipt. Why? Lack of trust. Which is the way it should be. Your bank sends you statements each month. Repeat as above. I wont go on, because I have made my point, I hope.
And yes I said DEMOCRATS steal elections.
for each $party in America.PoliticalParties
Not OK when $party steals or commits fraud in an election. next
The battleships had electro-mechanical fire control computers, Radio sets, and I believe they had electric drive for the turret rotation and gun elevation.
The Lexington, Saratoga, and I think about 2 or 3 battleships had electric drives. I dont know about driving those once, much less twice.
I would imagine cooking was done on electric ranges, but I cant confirm that. It would be one less thing to catch fire, and I do know that ships of that era had SSTG's to produce electricity, above and beyond the drives of the ships alluded to.
That could be a problem, yes. I cant help but think that that must be a solvable problem.
But doing their own enrichment leaves them open to questions about their intended usage. And I think it is reasonable to question their intentions at this time.
And, unless they have internal sources of the raw materials, they would be subject to manipulations in any case.
Sorry, I patented the patenting of patenting a a class of patents.
I also patented suing people, places, and things.
You can still sue a verb, if you like. My patent for that has not yet been awarded ( submarine patent on you... Opps, I was not supposed to say that... )
No reasonable person can place the blame on Microsoft here.
You have a very good point. There is one minor point to make here, I think, and that is that Microsoft is responsible for Microsoft abusing their monopoly position and putting themselves under the scrutiny they are under. If their actions and attitudes had been different, they would have more options at times like this.
I agree that Microsoft is damned if they do and damned if they dont.
It would be easier to sympathize with Microsoft if they had taken security more seriously from the beginning, and had worked more on these issues rather than chasing features.
The US would not nessesarily be the only supplier.
I can understand as well that Iran would want it's own refining ability.
And I am sure that Iran understands why the US, at least, might be a bit uncomfortable with Iran having tha ability. I am sure they would not admit it.
I would have imagined that Iran could have either made it a contractual, or even a treaty issue, and probably could have had their choice of ( multiple ) supplier partners to choose from. With clauses that state that they will seek their own enrichment if there are issues with supply, limits on prices, etc, etc. And the supplier would not have to be the US, but there might be verification issues with some suppliers.
I am sure there are many issues to resolve, but it seems solvable to me.
One thing that is telling about Iran possibly wanting a bomb is that if they really only wanted electricity, then the deals where the uranium was enriched outside Iran should have worked.
Slashdot Mirror
Of course I am kidding you.
I did tell google they spelled their name
wrong, I think that lead to the listing of
"google" in the dictionary, to prove me
"wrong". Ha, I said to them. Revisionists.
It's Yee. Not Whee. Yee Ha.
There should inherently be distrust of our election officials, always every time, forever.
If they cant stand an audit, they should not be there.
Ever sell a house? Escrow companies exist because there is something of value
and in the transfer you cannnot trust always the other side. Which is exactly
as it should be. Sell a car? Notice of transfer of liability. Why? Because
you cant always trust the other party involved. Which is the way it should be.
If you buy something you are issued a receipt. Why? Lack of trust. Which is
the way it should be. Your bank sends you statements each month. Repeat as
above. I wont go on, because I have made my point, I hope.
for each $party in America.PoliticalParties
Not OK when $party steals or commits fraud in an election.
next
The cost of Freedom is high.
Should be "...you western infidel..."
Are we there yet?
Almost forgot. I seem to recall that ships magazines where
kept refridgerated. I would imagine that was electrical.
I think they had electric motors then also.
But yes, the electrical consumption rate was different.
I still think it is pretty impressive.
The battleships had electro-mechanical fire control computers,
Radio sets, and I believe they had electric drive for the
turret rotation and gun elevation.
The Lexington, Saratoga, and I think about 2 or 3 battleships
had electric drives. I dont know about driving those once, much
less twice.
I would imagine cooking was done on electric ranges, but I cant
confirm that. It would be one less thing to catch fire, and I
do know that ships of that era had SSTG's to produce electricity,
above and beyond the drives of the ships alluded to.
I dont know about nuke, but USS Lexington ( CV2 )
powered Tacoma in 1929 for about a month.
here
She had a turbo electric drive, so she could generate a lot of power.
That could be a problem, yes. I cant help but think
that that must be a solvable problem.
But doing their own enrichment leaves them open to questions about
their intended usage. And I think it is reasonable to question
their intentions at this time.
And, unless they have internal sources of the raw materials, they
would be subject to manipulations in any case.
If they did, they would be rich!
Sorry, I patented the patenting of patenting a a class of patents.
I also patented suing people, places, and things.
You can still sue a verb, if you like. My patent for that
has not yet been awarded ( submarine patent on you...
Opps, I was not supposed to say that... )
You have a very good point. There is one minor point to make here, I think, and that
is that Microsoft is responsible for Microsoft abusing their monopoly position and putting
themselves under the scrutiny they are under. If their actions and attitudes had
been different, they would have more options at times like this.
I agree that Microsoft is damned if they do and damned if
they dont.
It would be easier to sympathize with Microsoft if they had
taken security more seriously from the beginning, and had
worked more on these issues rather than chasing features.
That was not right.
I did miss it.
Yes, but I patented the patenting of the composition of words used to convey ideas, thoughts or emotions.
Sorry.
I have a patcnt covering the act of patenting anything.
The US would not nessesarily be the only supplier.
I can understand as well that Iran would want it's own refining ability.
And I am sure that Iran understands why the US, at least, might
be a bit uncomfortable with Iran having tha ability. I am sure
they would not admit it.
According to the header, the patent was filed in 2000,
Cisco bought SA earlier this year.
I patented patenting prior art, just hand that over here.
And that.
And the other thing.
And those, over there.
I'll be back for more later.
I would have imagined that Iran could have either made it
a contractual, or even a treaty issue, and probably could
have had their choice of ( multiple ) supplier partners
to choose from. With clauses that state that they will
seek their own enrichment if there are issues with supply,
limits on prices, etc, etc. And the supplier would not
have to be the US, but there might be verification issues
with some suppliers.
I am sure there are many issues to resolve, but it seems
solvable to me.
Quite funny.
One thing that is telling about Iran possibly wanting a bomb is
that if they really only wanted electricity, then the deals where
the uranium was enriched outside Iran should have worked.
Taxation without representation......
And the names even match! Bonus!
I intended no perpetual computation, really. :-)
Just the idea that the waste heat might supplant some
part of the power input.