As long as you don't rob people of their skins with the gambling sites just let people gamble with their (actual terms may not say it's "their" skins) skins if they want to.
Or he was just depressed having lost his successful creation and by impulse started to risk his own life and this happened and it may not have been planned or rationalized at all.
Supposedly he had run into the front-gate of a school where it said "Steam" and done some donuts before leaving.
Guess he may just have felt "fuck it" and drove on the wrong side just risking it not necessarily planning a collision though the odds is pretty high.
His accounts was banned from trading and all his items held (=stolen if the EULA accepted you actually owned them) due to idiotic gambling laws not allowing style of work he did / type of company he ran?
The micro-code updates aren't permanent changes in the processor.
One can just enable it and run the system like that and then notice if it become slower or not, even with your own benchmark whatever Intel say and if it did and you don't want it just disable it again.
You aren't enabling it in the dark and then stuck with it. Well unless you run Windows 10 and Microsoft force you to update and install it all the time.
That was quite a bit of text making it somewhat unclear. But the terms are such that you aren't allowed to sell your copy (make a new one but abandoning yours so to say.)
Because you don't need 32 bit precision for all graphics calculation plus ai plus maybe their aliasingaithingy use them plus there's still all the raytracing.
Why the fuck would one ignore half the GPU just because all one know about from before and have used then was the cuda cores?
Actually there's not since the tensor cores put out a lot of 16 bit, 8 bit or 4 bit precision floating point operations per second.
Something Nvidia haven't allowed the consumer cards to do a lot of and even if they had let them do so those cuda cores would had been FAAAR behind what the tensor cores alone are doing.... and then there's still the other 1/4 of the gpu for casting the rays. Plus the software side.
The chip is much larger. And use GDDR6 for whatever that's worth. Of course it's more expensive.
Now just release it on 7 nm with a smaller size instead..
I guess out of body experiences could be fear and memories of ones own situation too. As in you lying there thinking about what are happening to you and as such paint that picture and later remember that you thought that way. Doesn't mean somehow was observing yourself from out of your body but rather just imagine what was happening to your body. Quite a difference.
As for actual responses due to chemical changes / drugging of the body / natural occuring DMT or similar compounds (well, that or the morphine or whatever given to people one know are in pain and will die soon) their experiences are likely different. Those killed by a rocket to their head likely don't get no events like this because things become so very broken so very fast.
Yeah, the idiotic idea that the collective knows best.
Practically we've ended up with a few individuals who pretend or possibly even try to act in the interest of the collective but fail. Regardless none of those are me and even if it was me someone would be unhappy with my authority to rule over them and not like my decisions.
A free market economy instead let me make the choice but of course there there's a limit for to what capacity I can get things my way limited by my capacity to spend. If you want to enable a higher capacity to make more choices according to your wishes for the poorer in such a society you can still redistribute wealth thereby lowering the capacity for others but increasing it for those with the smallest means. Still no idiot or whole society deciding for them though.
Like Swedish forced socialist television in co-operation with two free liberal & moderate papers which run faktiskt.se (actually.com kinda) make the claim that when Polish TV made the claim that Sweden have prioritized immigration over fire-fighting capacity that was completely wrong.
We've had similar arguments before. "It's different budgets!" From the left there's also always more money which can be taken from others through higher taxes so you don't even have to choose one or the other thing but could rather do both and the problem is always those who want lower taxes rather than what the money should be spent on. Similarly that camp figure that all kinds of work regardless of in how little demand it is should be paid an equal amount and that all paid for labor is justified, good and equal.
Anyway, back to the fire-fighting capacity. Of course you could argue that we still could afford fire-fighting planes or more helicopters or whatever if we wanted to / decided so, or raised taxes, or whatever. Regardless the choice has been made to not get a pair of planes ourselves likely because of cost vs benefit and what one should choose with the money given. A ~fixed amount of money which exist and which you can do different things with. Currently in the national budget the post Migration is 40 billion and two planes has been said to cost about 100 million so that's 800 planes worth. All the immigrants who are already here have lower employment, lower wages, lower tax income, I guess about or higher demands on society (maybe a tiny bit younger then again more people unemployed and more expensive solutions), I don't know what their year on year cost is but some hundreds of billions and of the asylum seekers 2015 (163 000) if 150 000 get asylum and with at-least 1 relative per immigrant for a total of 300 000 the life time cost for society will become over one trillion SEK, or 20 000 planes. So of course it matters.
It's not like MSB said "no, because of all the immigrants we won't get planes" but of course how much money you get in and how much everything cost decide what you can do and not do and you have to choose and choices have consequences.
Sweden of course could have say built up more military resources and used those for fire-fighting instead of letting lots of immigrants in. We didn't. Poland haven't let many in and as such can use a larger share of their tax money onto other things.
So I wouldn't say it's "completely false!"
And if social media try to remove all that someone could argue "is false" then a lot of stuff which isn't "completely false" will get removed. They should let everything pass instead and then you have to figure out yourself that vaccines are good after all and climate change is happening and it's very likely due to human activity. Maybe it could raise the IQ level of those idiots who don't get it a tiny bit too because they are being forced to think a tiny bit themselves. Then again I have no real hopes that they will ever get anything. People in general are too stupid.
I thought officially it was the gathering of space assets into one umbrella?
Also Russia is way more defensive than the USA. Russia have poor means (relative the US) to do something somewhere else. I guess given a choice of having the same capability or not they would want the same one but their military is focused on defending their territory and sovereignty.
... seeing as how fewer than half of them will ever be able to pay off their college loans
Socialism isn't about getting the means to get by by yourself.
Here in Sweden the social-democrats have ruled for ~100 years and we've got the highest taxes on work on the planet.
Socialism isn't about enabled you to get by. Do you think the Social-democrats want you to keep your money and solve things by yourself?
If no-one could ever afford an education, a house, transport, food, whatever, that would be best for them. Because then they would be needed.
There's a reason people don't get to keep their salary or save for their pension themselves. When they are in need because they can't do it themselves they will be forced to keep the system which will provide for them.
Give people options and capability and they may vote for something else.
If you want to equalize outcome and help the poor get more while keeping capitalism just tax the dead, put a fee on environmental damage and natural resources or say use a flat tax on any earnings or ownership for everyone and then just redistribute that money to everyone again.
If people get money rather than services then they can at-least still make their own choices and we get no rulers and political solutions for problems
Giving the money to politicians who do whatever with the money make for some very fucked up decisions and spending on some very unwanted things. Plus it give them power of course.
Capitalism is great. Socialism is bad. If you want to redistribute wealth on society just do that rather than elect authorities.
Start a space war branch. Whine that Russia for whatever related to war in space.
Make sense.
Also the agencies have no credibility for the stories they make up. Right now a top 10 video of militray plans which never happened is playing on my computer including CIA suggesting supporting American communists to attack the USA to put the blame on Cuba and make it possible to attack them. It's happened so many times.
Of course Russia will make weapons for space war if the US do so.
Slashdot Mirror
That liberty is good and restrictions are bad.
As long as you don't rob people of their skins with the gambling sites just let people gamble with their (actual terms may not say it's "their" skins) skins if they want to.
Or he was just depressed having lost his successful creation and by impulse started to risk his own life and this happened and it may not have been planned or rationalized at all.
Whatever.
Supposedly he had run into the front-gate of a school where it said "Steam" and done some donuts before leaving.
Guess he may just have felt "fuck it" and drove on the wrong side just risking it not necessarily planning a collision though the odds is pretty high.
His accounts was banned from trading and all his items held (=stolen if the EULA accepted you actually owned them) due to idiotic gambling laws not allowing style of work he did / type of company he ran?
And allowing benchmark again.
And chance it was an old beta license?
Intel are a dressing this and removing this part.
Reality Prison :/
The micro-code updates aren't permanent changes in the processor.
One can just enable it and run the system like that and then notice if it become slower or not, even with your own benchmark whatever Intel say and if it did and you don't want it just disable it again.
You aren't enabling it in the dark and then stuck with it. Well unless you run Windows 10 and Microsoft force you to update and install it all the time.
Just test and see yourself?
Stop assuming people who run games care less about security than those possible just using the computer for one task where this may not be a risk.
People who game likely use their machine in a way putting them at risk.
Trump negotiations:
"This is what I'll do. See ya suckers."
This should had ended with a question mark.
That was quite a bit of text making it somewhat unclear.
But the terms are such that you aren't allowed to sell your copy (make a new one but abandoning yours so to say.)
And do the platform support that transfer?
Because you don't need 32 bit precision for all graphics calculation plus ai plus maybe their aliasingaithingy use them plus there's still all the raytracing.
Why the fuck would one ignore half the GPU just because all one know about from before and have used then was the cuda cores?
Actually there's not since the tensor cores put out a lot of 16 bit, 8 bit or 4 bit precision floating point operations per second.
Something Nvidia haven't allowed the consumer cards to do a lot of and even if they had let them do so those cuda cores would had been FAAAR behind what the tensor cores alone are doing. ... and then there's still the other 1/4 of the gpu for casting the rays. Plus the software side.
The chip is much larger. And use GDDR6 for whatever that's worth. Of course it's more expensive.
Now just release it on 7 nm with a smaller size instead ..
For the CUDA cores?
Which is half the chip?
Now if you split the FP16 performance of the tensor cores and added those on top of the others you'd add ... a lot.
And then there's the other 1/4 of the chip for the raycasting.
But sure, go buy the 1080Ti instead. Save some money. You oh so brilliant person.
Buy stocks pirate games?
Then again I kinda only have played like three games so ..
I too would assume the light is lamps.
I guess out of body experiences could be fear and memories of ones own situation too. As in you lying there thinking about what are happening to you and as such paint that picture and later remember that you thought that way. Doesn't mean somehow was observing yourself from out of your body but rather just imagine what was happening to your body. Quite a difference.
As for actual responses due to chemical changes / drugging of the body / natural occuring DMT or similar compounds (well, that or the morphine or whatever given to people one know are in pain and will die soon) their experiences are likely different. Those killed by a rocket to their head likely don't get no events like this because things become so very broken so very fast.
Yeah, the idiotic idea that the collective knows best.
Practically we've ended up with a few individuals who pretend or possibly even try to act in the interest of the collective but fail. Regardless none of those are me and even if it was me someone would be unhappy with my authority to rule over them and not like my decisions.
A free market economy instead let me make the choice but of course there there's a limit for to what capacity I can get things my way limited by my capacity to spend. If you want to enable a higher capacity to make more choices according to your wishes for the poorer in such a society you can still redistribute wealth thereby lowering the capacity for others but increasing it for those with the smallest means. Still no idiot or whole society deciding for them though.
My C2D Macbook Pro was an expensive piece of shit.
Communists never learn so we get the same crazyness again and again.
Like Swedish forced socialist television in co-operation with two free liberal & moderate papers which run faktiskt.se (actually.com kinda) make the claim that when Polish TV made the claim that Sweden have prioritized immigration over fire-fighting capacity that was completely wrong.
We've had similar arguments before. "It's different budgets!"
From the left there's also always more money which can be taken from others through higher taxes so you don't even have to choose one or the other thing but could rather do both and the problem is always those who want lower taxes rather than what the money should be spent on. Similarly that camp figure that all kinds of work regardless of in how little demand it is should be paid an equal amount and that all paid for labor is justified, good and equal.
Anyway, back to the fire-fighting capacity. Of course you could argue that we still could afford fire-fighting planes or more helicopters or whatever if we wanted to / decided so, or raised taxes, or whatever.
Regardless the choice has been made to not get a pair of planes ourselves likely because of cost vs benefit and what one should choose with the money given. A ~fixed amount of money which exist and which you can do different things with. Currently in the national budget the post Migration is 40 billion and two planes has been said to cost about 100 million so that's 800 planes worth. All the immigrants who are already here have lower employment, lower wages, lower tax income, I guess about or higher demands on society (maybe a tiny bit younger then again more people unemployed and more expensive solutions), I don't know what their year on year cost is but some hundreds of billions and of the asylum seekers 2015 (163 000) if 150 000 get asylum and with at-least 1 relative per immigrant for a total of 300 000 the life time cost for society will become over one trillion SEK, or 20 000 planes. So of course it matters.
It's not like MSB said "no, because of all the immigrants we won't get planes" but of course how much money you get in and how much everything cost decide what you can do and not do and you have to choose and choices have consequences.
Sweden of course could have say built up more military resources and used those for fire-fighting instead of letting lots of immigrants in. We didn't. Poland haven't let many in and as such can use a larger share of their tax money onto other things.
So I wouldn't say it's "completely false!"
And if social media try to remove all that someone could argue "is false" then a lot of stuff which isn't "completely false" will get removed. They should let everything pass instead and then you have to figure out yourself that vaccines are good after all and climate change is happening and it's very likely due to human activity. Maybe it could raise the IQ level of those idiots who don't get it a tiny bit too because they are being forced to think a tiny bit themselves. Then again I have no real hopes that they will ever get anything. People in general are too stupid.
I thought officially it was the gathering of space assets into one umbrella?
Also Russia is way more defensive than the USA. Russia have poor means (relative the US) to do something somewhere else. I guess given a choice of having the same capability or not they would want the same one but their military is focused on defending their territory and sovereignty.
... seeing as how fewer than half of them will ever be able to pay off their college loans
Socialism isn't about getting the means to get by by yourself.
Here in Sweden the social-democrats have ruled for ~100 years and we've got the highest taxes on work on the planet.
Socialism isn't about enabled you to get by. Do you think the Social-democrats want you to keep your money and solve things by yourself?
If no-one could ever afford an education, a house, transport, food, whatever, that would be best for them. Because then they would be needed.
There's a reason people don't get to keep their salary or save for their pension themselves. When they are in need because they can't do it themselves they will be forced to keep the system which will provide for them.
Give people options and capability and they may vote for something else.
If you want to equalize outcome and help the poor get more while keeping capitalism just tax the dead, put a fee on environmental damage and natural resources or say use a flat tax on any earnings or ownership for everyone and then just redistribute that money to everyone again.
If people get money rather than services then they can at-least still make their own choices and we get no rulers and political solutions for problems
Giving the money to politicians who do whatever with the money make for some very fucked up decisions and spending on some very unwanted things. Plus it give them power of course.
Capitalism is great. Socialism is bad. If you want to redistribute wealth on society just do that rather than elect authorities.
Start a space war branch.
Whine that Russia for whatever related to war in space.
Make sense.
Also the agencies have no credibility for the stories they make up. Right now a top 10 video of militray plans which never happened is playing on my computer including CIA suggesting supporting American communists to attack the USA to put the blame on Cuba and make it possible to attack them.
It's happened so many times.
Of course Russia will make weapons for space war if the US do so.