Just skip the batteries and do a gasoline engine powering a generator which run water hydrolysis which combust hydrogen gas and oxygen which run a generator which run an electric motor and you've got yourself a gasoline-water/hydrogen and oxygen-hybrid!! With really poor performance per gallon values. AWESOME! (Feel free to throw in a pump, a dam, a boiler, a condensator, a water fall and a turbine to for good measure)
In this case however it's likely less about consumption and more about torque or possibly a combination of the two.
I think they are just called "gas hybrids" here in Sweden when they are actually biogas hybrids and hydrogen hybrids when they are hydrogen gas hybrids, or something such. Which doesn't make any sense either.
Personally for me though I was wondering whatever it was actually running on gas of any sort which would be different for a Ferrari or whatever it was running on gasoline. I don't think "gas-hydrid" tell (for me), gasoline-hybrid would. So I had to check it up. Whatever it was obvious or not for everyone else I don't know.
I don't really understand why there's two different words used in different "styles" of English/countries both using English ("I speak American damnit!";D)
Since the sensitivity seem to come from 7,5 times bigger pixels in the sensor (among other things at least) it likely handel dynamic range better since it can have a bigger difference between 1 and maximum amount of collected photons so to speak.
I don't understand why people mention differences in upload and download speed and caps when I asked about when you needed 1 gbps (which I also assumed was download speed.)
Yeah, cloud storage using 1 gbps in both directions are better than cloud storage using 100 mbps in both direction. I do understand that. Point taken for that one at least.
Though if I really needed those speeds I would eventually do it locally, but for some people that won't be an alternative because they want better security (read backup.)
Between my girlfriend and I we used 180GB last month and that didn't include a drop of piracy. A few hours of hd streaming per day, both of us streaming spotify all day, online backup from four computers and that's most of our quota gone. At the rate we're ramping up, I expect we'll hit the comcast 250G limit before the end of the year.
I don't have a quota though.
And 100 mbps would be 32400 GB / month assuming giga = 1000 mega and 30 days / month and full speed the whole time.
Or for a year 394,2 TB.
So the 1 gbps or 100 mbps is uninteresting for a cap of 250 GB / year.
Heck even at 1 gbps you could still be capped at 250 GB / year. YAY! Ultra fast downloads of very little!:D
1 gbps for a year would of course be 3942000 GB / year or 15768 times your current cap..
It is needed, for instance, for the commercial and non-commercial distribution of video content, an activity which was called "television" once and which continues to provide protected revenues to companies that have entered the Internet business simply to control it.
It is also needed to provide to full-time duplex streams of random dummy signals to camouflage encrypted messages...
1 gbps? Really? 100 mbps isn't enough? I have had 100 mbps for plenty of years and 10 mbps for plenty of years before that and I don't watch TV over the Internet but I can't see why 100 mbps wouldn't be enough. I assume that something like 28 mbps xDSL might be enough to. I don't know what what bitrates the video is streamed.
You can make stuff with gold: jewelry, electronics, shielding, etc. Other metals used for currency such as copper and silver have other uses to. They have value and uses far beyond that of a simple currency. What can you make out of a bitcoin?
It's a matter of acceptance but because you think other things matter:
As much as with dollars. Or well, you can wipe your ass with dollars if you don't mind the grime and drugs but that's about it. Expensive heating source?
Translation: Boo-fucking-hoo. Online marketing scum have been abusing users for years, making this a retaliatory measure. Let them cry all they want, because nobody gives a shit.
Until I have to pay for site access...
Sure, I'll just use a different site as long as that's a viable option. But that's not necessarily the truth / a choice.
Slashdot Mirror
I wouldn't be so sure about it.
Also, Tesla Roadster:
http://www.streetfire.net/video/top-gear-reviews-tesla-roadster_206233.htm
Just skip the batteries and do a gasoline engine powering a generator which run water hydrolysis which combust hydrogen gas and oxygen which run a generator which run an electric motor and you've got yourself a gasoline-water/hydrogen and oxygen-hybrid!! With really poor performance per gallon values. AWESOME! (Feel free to throw in a pump, a dam, a boiler, a condensator, a water fall and a turbine to for good measure)
In this case however it's likely less about consumption and more about torque or possibly a combination of the two.
I think they are just called "gas hybrids" here in Sweden when they are actually biogas hybrids and hydrogen hybrids when they are hydrogen gas hybrids, or something such. Which doesn't make any sense either.
Personally for me though I was wondering whatever it was actually running on gas of any sort which would be different for a Ferrari or whatever it was running on gasoline. I don't think "gas-hydrid" tell (for me), gasoline-hybrid would. So I had to check it up. Whatever it was obvious or not for everyone else I don't know.
I don't really understand why there's two different words used in different "styles" of English/countries both using English ("I speak American damnit!" ;D)
True story: I was eating chocolate ice-cream while reading this story.
Gas - It's not a liquid.
... or solid =P (or plasma and possibly others. The idea was mostly to separate it from gasoline.)
So it's a petroleum/gasoline-electic hybrid.
Not gas powered.
Gas - It's not a liquid.
But all the same could be said for bitcoins of course.
Macs, iPhones and iPads ships with Safari.
Most Linux dists with Firefox and I suppose Android may have a standard browser to.
OH THE HUMANITY! THE HORRORS! I HAVE TO CHANGE BROWSER MYSELF?!
Stupid.
Today the browser is even more important than the rest of the OS =P, at least (eventually) as far as the user (me at least =P) is concerned.
Surely it should be 7.5 times as many, not larger. Otherwiise the resolution would be 7.5 times worse.
No. Of course it's fewer.
And worse resolution isn't much of a problem since 1080p for instance uses quite a bit less pixels than the for instance 18 megapixels of the 1DX.
Since the sensitivity seem to come from 7,5 times bigger pixels in the sensor (among other things at least) it likely handel dynamic range better since it can have a bigger difference between 1 and maximum amount of collected photons so to speak.
Citation needed.
I'm from Sweden. I could had written också =P
Only time I use too is for excessive. I don't know how it should be used beyond that :)
Saw this http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/too but I can't say I really get the fourth one and I won't remember it all anyway.
It's worse when it happen in my native language but it likely do there to. Especially since I just write how I speak so to say. Like this.
If I had spell- and grammatics checker maybe I would do better =P
I had to google it to.
Still better than a car analogy though.
I don't understand why people mention differences in upload and download speed and caps when I asked about when you needed 1 gbps (which I also assumed was download speed.)
Yeah, cloud storage using 1 gbps in both directions are better than cloud storage using 100 mbps in both direction. I do understand that. Point taken for that one at least.
Though if I really needed those speeds I would eventually do it locally, but for some people that won't be an alternative because they want better security (read backup.)
Between my girlfriend and I we used 180GB last month and that didn't include a drop of piracy. A few hours of hd streaming per day, both of us streaming spotify all day, online backup from four computers and that's most of our quota gone. At the rate we're ramping up, I expect we'll hit the comcast 250G limit before the end of the year.
I don't have a quota though.
And 100 mbps would be 32400 GB / month assuming giga = 1000 mega and 30 days / month and full speed the whole time.
Or for a year 394,2 TB.
So the 1 gbps or 100 mbps is uninteresting for a cap of 250 GB / year.
Heck even at 1 gbps you could still be capped at 250 GB / year. YAY! Ultra fast downloads of very little! :D
1 gbps for a year would of course be 3942000 GB / year or 15768 times your current cap ..
It is needed, for instance, for the commercial and non-commercial distribution of video content, an activity which was called "television" once and which continues to provide protected revenues to companies that have entered the Internet business simply to control it.
It is also needed to provide to full-time duplex streams of random dummy signals to camouflage encrypted messages ...
1 gbps? Really? 100 mbps isn't enough? I have had 100 mbps for plenty of years and 10 mbps for plenty of years before that and I don't watch TV over the Internet but I can't see why 100 mbps wouldn't be enough. I assume that something like 28 mbps xDSL might be enough to. I don't know what what bitrates the video is streamed.
Um, yeah - that's because it's waaaaaaaay overpriced.
Also only really needed for piracy.
Feel free to list applications where it's needed for normal people and list how many may be interested in those.
What we need to do is to give Google a bigger budget and military than the US.
Then I'd start to feel safe in giving them my information =P
Also research is likely to be done with Google!
I see a trap!
No.
And these are still ugly and it would be sad to see them in anything.
Also they are all white / red heads.
You can make stuff with gold: jewelry, electronics, shielding, etc. Other metals used for currency such as copper and silver have other uses to. They have value and uses far beyond that of a simple currency. What can you make out of a bitcoin?
It's a matter of acceptance but because you think other things matter:
As much as with dollars. Or well, you can wipe your ass with dollars if you don't mind the grime and drugs but that's about it. Expensive heating source?
("Mind? I love them!")
Translation: Boo-fucking-hoo. Online marketing scum have been abusing users for years, making this a retaliatory measure. Let them cry all they want, because nobody gives a shit.
Until I have to pay for site access...
Sure, I'll just use a different site as long as that's a viable option. But that's not necessarily the truth / a choice.
You're talking about emoticons, not emoji. BTW the full emoji set includes just under 830 images, not 20 some yellow smiley faces.
Turns out we don't know what emoji is, care, have a need for it and in many cases likely don't want it.
They was also ugly. I for sure don't want them to become standard in anything I use. Too bad it will happen :(
Just order 1000x JAS-39 NG (or said 2400, or 5000!) and everyone will be happy! (Well, some would =P)
Just PM me in advance so I can get some SAAB stocks before your place the order =P