Slashdot Mirror


Groupon Still Losing Money, CEO Is Fired And Leaks Final Email

New submitter Inzkeeper writes with news that the CEO of Groupon met the axe today: "Groupon CEO Andrew Mason made public an email he sent to Groupon employees. He takes responsibility for the company's downturn, expresses his appreciation for his staff, and wishes them well. 'For those who are concerned about me, please don't be — I love Groupon, and I'm terribly proud of what we've created. I'm OK with having failed at this part of the journey. If Groupon was Battletoads, it would be like I made it all the way to the Terra Tubes without dying on my first ever play through.'" Despite increased revenues, they are still losing about $81 million each quarter, and Wall Street needs blood.

207 comments

  1. For those who are concerned about me by Ripp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet most stopped right there.

    --
    Blech. Signatures.
    1. Re: For those who are concerned about me by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      He is the founder, and probably know a lot of people therr personally.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re: For those who are concerned about me by multiben · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Harsh. It may be convenient to group people into nice neat categories eg. "All CEOs are terrible people with no feelings", but in reality the world is a much more varied place.

    3. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Yup, maybe they should look for a CEO with at least a tenuous connection to reality.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      For those who are concerned about me

      Personally, I would reserve judgement until I know what his severance package is. If he left without one, then I might be concerned. If he was given a few million in cash/stock before he left, then there is hardly any reason to worry, is there?

      It's not that CEOs don't get fired, it's that they often make more money by being fired then they do by working.

    5. Re: For those who are concerned about me by rekoil · · Score: 4, Informative

      His severance package is $378.36. not $378 thousand or $378 million, Three Hundred and Seventy Eight dollars and Thirty Six cents.

    6. Re: For those who are concerned about me by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

      He got a Groupon for a $1 million severance package for only $500,000.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    7. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet most stopped right there.

      Actually, I saw the word "Battletoads" while quickly scanning. Then I realized what I was reading and stopped right there.

    8. Re: For those who are concerned about me by davester666 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that totally sucks. Course, he can probably just cruise for awhile on the $200+ million in stock he's got...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Or even if all that disappeared he might be able to barely squeak by with the $30M he already cashed out...

    10. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have no idea what the CEO is like, but from the first time I saw one of their promotions, I thought this is a really bad concept, and I would not invest a bean in it.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re: For those who are concerned about me by symbolset · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He had an idea and marketed it well. Then had an IPO where he gained hundreds of millions of real dollars in real money for the phantom value of a business that didn't work. Now that he's got the money he departs with a smile having been fired rather than quit so it's not his fault if it all goes horribly awry now since it wasn't of his own volition and his story can be it might have survived if only it had followed his secret plan.

      We ought to call this one the "clean and jerk". It's becoming a standard model. Some manage to repeat the process multiple times, like AOL.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    12. Re: For those who are concerned about me by symbolset · · Score: 2

      maybe they should look for a CEO with at least a tenuous connection to reality.

      Good luck with that.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    13. Re: For those who are concerned about me by PhamNguyen · · Score: 2

      It's like those poor fools attribute the rise of the company from nothing to him, and not just it's recent decline.

    14. Re: For those who are concerned about me by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Harsh. It may be convenient to group people into nice neat categories eg. "All CEOs are terrible people with no feelings", but in reality the world is a much more varied place.

      Good CEOs have to put the company above their personal feelings. If they can't do this they will strangle their company to death by making terrible decisions. On some level being a terrible person is part of the job.

      I've worked in a company where the CEO could not separate his personal feelings from work duties. When the money ran out he could not cut costs anywhere, he could not even retire off staff that got to retirement age. All his so called friends got lazy and only looked out for their own interests because they knew they could get away with it. If you were there you would love a good old fashioned sociopath CEO, at least they will fire 5 people to save 50.

    15. Re: For those who are concerned about me by daem0n1x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just like everything else in life, a good balance is the best thing. Mr. Niceguy does not make a good CEO, or a good leader in any human endeavour. But a society that glorifies psychopaths is horribly wrong.

    16. Re: For those who are concerned about me by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      this is an interesting issue because people tend to want their leaders to have empathy, but it can be argued that they would be better served by utilitarians.

    17. Re: For those who are concerned about me by bitt3n · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have no idea what the CEO is like, but from the first time I saw one of their promotions, I thought this is a really bad concept, and I would not invest a bean in it.

      what if we give you 50% off the second bean's worth

    18. Re: For those who are concerned about me by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      You assume an utilitarian would try to be useful to the organisation, instead of only to himself.

    19. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      If you were there you would love a good old fashioned sociopath CEO, at least they will fire 5 people to save 50.

      Except that the good old fashioned sociopath CEO would never have reached this point in the first place. He'd have fired the 50 long ago to pad out his golden parachute and long since jumped ship.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    20. Re: For those who are concerned about me by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      CEOs, like politicians, usually start out as normal, everyday friendly, well meaning people. It is just the system that corrupts them.

      "When You Dance With the Devil, the Devil Don't Change - the Devil Changes You"

    21. Re: For those who are concerned about me by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      Presumably one makes that assumption of any leader he supports, even such leader as appears to act out of empathy.

    22. Re: For those who are concerned about me by fuzzybunny · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Empathy and calculated reason are not mutually exclusive.

      I manage a pretty large team, and work in turn for a guy who is far better than I am - I tend toward "nice", whereas this guy is best described as "lawful neutral". He's punctiliously fair, weighs the needs of the company and the overall population of employees with those of the individuals, and while he will give people a chance, does not brook avoidable failure.

      I am learning a shitload from the guy, but understand that he'd drop me at a moment's notice - and that is okay. He's completely transparent about this, not in a threatening way, just very matter-of-factly because it's what he needs to do to keep the organization running successfully. We all know this and in turn do our best.

      It's not black or white - "nice" vs. "utilitarian". Proper balance is everything.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    23. Re: For those who are concerned about me by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Ditto, it simply made no sense. I'm surprised it grew at all, let alone to the size that it did. Yet some people (greedy ponzi speculators?) thought it was worth floating the company on the public stock market. (And 90% of its "value" went down the pipes within a year.) Everyone involved in that IPO should be taken out and flogged.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    24. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All CEOs are terrible people with no feelings. That's why Mr. Mason never had any business being a CEO.

      Also, the total lack of experience and expertise with any sort of large company. That's another reason.

    25. Re: For those who are concerned about me by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      In the sense that one can, for example, fire someone and yet be empathetic toward him, I agree that empathy and utilitarianism are not mutually exclusive. However, it appears to me the relevant question is not whether the agent possesses empathy, but whether empathy or utilitarianism motivates his actions. Someone who kicks the fat guy off the bridge to save the lives of the people on the trolley might indeed feel empathy toward that person, and even visit his grave every day, but the action of doing the kicking is itself strictly utilitarian, indistinguishable from the same action were it committed by a sociopath who doesn't think twice about it.

    26. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You can be professional without being neither the pushover or the sociopath jerk. The same way you as an employer can be professional without working yourself to death at the manager's whim or being a BOFH. In fact neither of those really score many points for professionalism in my book.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    27. Re: For those who are concerned about me by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Someone who kicks the fat guy off the bridge to save the lives of the people on the trolley might indeed feel empathy toward that person, and even visit his grave every day, but the action of doing the kicking is itself strictly utilitarian, indistinguishable from the same action were it committed by a sociopath who doesn't think twice about it.

      A sociopath wouldn't give a fuck about the fat guy or the people in the trolley, hence he would do nothing, if it wasn't advantageous to him.

    28. Re: For those who are concerned about me by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      that is correct, the thought experiment requires that the utilitarian place some practical value on human life.

    29. Re: For those who are concerned about me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Andrew Mason is famous: he is the man who saved Google a few billion dollars.

    30. Re: For those who are concerned about me by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      I bet most stopped right there.

      I stopped at terratoads... or whatever. Is he referring to video games or something? In any case, sounds like he is more concerned with how he is perceived then what he accomplished. Like he craves acceptance. Not a great quality in a leader IMO.

      Secondly, groupon always seemed to me like one of those ideas that massive support because everyone things that this is something other people will use... and then they try it once and never do it again. Prove me wrong groupon.

  2. His problem is that they're too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You need to be big like Amazon to lose money like that.

    1. Re:His problem is that they're too small by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe Amazon should buy Groupon. Think of the synergies and new paradigms in losses!

    2. Re:His problem is that they're too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon has a competing service...that's why groupon is getting boned.

    3. Re:His problem is that they're too small by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or more accurately, they are getting boned because EVERYONE has a competing service. Barrier to entry on this concept is near zero.

    4. Re:His problem is that they're too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're being funny- but on a serious note- amazon owns a large stake in livingsocial.

    5. Re:His problem is that they're too small by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 1

      And on an even more serious note: that this business model doesn't work, shows Amazon's posting of $274 Million loss on LivingSocial

      .

    6. Re:His problem is that they're too small by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Maybe Amazon should buy Groupon. Think of the synergies and new paradigms in losses!

      I'm sure Amazon did want Groupon at some point in the past at a lower price. Instead Amazon backed LivingSocial, presumably when Groupon told them to pound sand with what Groupon saw as a substandard offer.

      And let's not discuss Google's $6B offer that Groupon stupidly turned down. It may sound silly, but perhaps then Google would have bought (and made use of) a real sales/call center organization.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  3. Battletoads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some sort of advertisement for Gametop?

    1. Re:Battletoads? by Binestar · · Score: 4, Informative

      No one with a 5 digit UID I can assure you that.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    2. Re:Battletoads? by Intropy · · Score: 2

      I certainly know Battletoads. But Terra Tubes? I thought Battletoads only had three levels.

    3. Re:Battletoads? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      The Russians apparently.

    4. Re:Battletoads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I did. So I don't know every shit game from when I was 18. Does that make me lose street cred with bitches like you? I guess faggots like you are just too cool. Go suck another dick.

    5. Re:Battletoads? by madbrain · · Score: 1

      I have never heard of either Battletoads or Terra tubes.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    6. Re:Battletoads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bing'd it... sorry

    7. Re:Battletoads? by vrt3 · · Score: 1

      I for one had never heard of it before, I'm afraid.

      --
      This sig under construction. Please check back later.
    8. Re:Battletoads? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 2

      3 leves, yes:
      hard, extremely difficult, and "who designed this impossibility?"

  4. On the other end... by zoffdino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a company that pumped the highest profit in a quarter without pumping oil. Massive cash pile, no debt. And Wall Street continues to punish it. Wall Street wants bloods.

    1. Re:On the other end... by zoffdino · · Score: 1

      But I did not utter the name of It-Who-Cannot-be-Named :((

    2. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're right to, the company has no future. They're getting killed in the market. ... and they're complete assholes, so good riddance. Their abuse of the patent system is inexcusable.

    3. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know. What is the problem with Nintendo stock? Their products are solid, they own a lot of influential IP, and a large stock of cash. It better get above $20 by the end of the year, they are definitely undervalued.

    4. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Spare me your apologetics. Wall Street sees something in apple's future that you are unable to understand.

      the reason apple got to be so profitable was innovative design. these days, Apple's os looks the same as it did 5 years ago. Its smartphone got slightly bigger. The mp3 market is drying up. There are now hundreds of tablets on the market and apple releases a smaller one.

      The market isn't biased against apple. It's simply realizing that the wave of iPod,iPhone,iPad is over. If apple isn't creating their own market then they're just coasting along and their stock value should reflect that.

    5. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I did not utter the name of It-Who-Cannot-be-Named :((

      True, but your post smelled kind of fruity.

    6. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice post a AC, but you're wrong on all counts. If you weren't AC I'd take the time to explain why.

      I doubt that, if you had any sort of argument to make you'd have made it. Names are only needed when the poster is relying on his or her reputation, or when you're planning to launch a personal attack instead of making a real argument. But looking at the parent post, I guess it's just a case of a troll with a face slamming on one without.

      But just FYI, this entire thread is nothing but flamebait, plain and simple so I'll respond in kind... only a complete dipshit would even bother using a real account to respond to it.

    7. Re:On the other end... by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since you replied to the AC only to say you won't answer ACs, I'll reply logged in. Just for you.

      Apple's fucked. They have no future. Their latest iPhone was a large "meh." It wasn't a flop, but it certainly wasn't the success that earlier versions were.

      Samsung, on the other hand, is showing impressive growth in that sector. Apple pissed off Samsung and lost their best supplier of quality parts. As a result, all Apple products that were using Samsung parts are now much, much worse. The new "retinal MacBook" has screens that have a "burn in" problem and apparently tint horribly pink.

      There's no hotly anticipated Apple release on the horizon. No one really cares what the next iPad will be. Every other tablet on the market meets its standard. The lackluster iPhone 5 release means no one cares about the next iPhone either. Apparently Apple still makes computers, but no one who isn't an Apple fan cares about those.

      Where's the future for Apple? Unless they announce something big real soon now, Wall Street is absolutely right to dump them. Google Glass is going to release soon (maybe), what's Apple's answer to that?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    8. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apple is now absolutely the worst manufacturer of hardware and software...

      except for all the others.

      Samsung does make great components... but their products are cheesy shit.

      Apple may suck... but everyone else is so fucking far behind them whatever point you think you're trying to make is completely moot.

    9. Re:On the other end... by ergo98 · · Score: 2

      I know, right? Being valued at $410 billion -- on the backs of two consumer products in a very fickle market -- is just brutally punishing, treating them like some fly-by-night nobodies. How grossly unfair.

    10. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's os looks the same as it did 5 years ago

      Apple should change it for change's sake. It worked so well for Gnome, KDE and Windows 8!

    11. Re:On the other end... by quenda · · Score: 2

      And Wall Street continues to punish it.

      In what sense? The only real way Wall St can punish a company is by not loaning them money, which Apple has no need of.
      Are you complaining about the stock price? $400billion valuation is "punishment"!?
      It is very high already in terms of revenue, employees, etc.
      Apple is not a big company like Ford or General Electric, just very profitable at the moment. Stock price reflects the market opinion of future profit.

    12. Re:On the other end... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      But will Apple's profits continue to increase? That is the question. If we knew for certain that they would, then Apple's stock price would be much higher now. Can you answer that question though? Are you certain that Apple's profits will increase? As a longtime Apple shareholder, I am not certain.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:On the other end... by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Oooh, you've angered the Apple marketdroids. Apple toys have become brat bait and that's never good for sales as it's considered tasteless. Now that's exactly what happens when you play the fad/fashion game, high profits but when the marketing loses it's bite as it always inevitably does, watch out. So groupon lots of noise and colour so that it could be sold and then hang on for the ride.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:On the other end... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Apple's fucked. They have no future. Their latest iPhone was a large "meh."

      To be more accurate, Apple has nowhere to go but down. Their stock price is still in a giant bubble compared to the companies actual worth (market cap is what someone would THEORETICALLY pay not what someone would actually pay).

      Apple's stock price got that high because they were very good at marketing. The Iphone had the cool factor but like all fads it's wearing off fast.

      I dont think Apple will be destroyed, rather it will be a shadow of it's former self as people become less enamoured with their products and competitors continue to produce superior competing products. Apple never really had the edge in technology, their entire advantage came from being popular, but popularity is a fickle mistress and will abandon them as fast as it came to them. This has already started to happen, Apple wont be destroyed, but it will end up with under 10% of the market (Windows Phone will probably have less than 2%). Their share price will shrink to below pre-iphone levels.

      Ultimately, as the cool factor wears off, Apple's customers will begin to realise how abusive Apple is. This is going to hurt them more than anything else. To their competitors Microsoft was as bad as Apple, but MS at least had the wisdom not to abuse their customers and this is why MS is still a juggernaught.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:On the other end... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Nintendo is milking an old cow. Eventually an old cow runs dry.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    16. Re:On the other end... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      On a PER and growth basis Apple should be worth over a trillion dollars already. The holdup seems to be death of St. Steve and doubts about the company's ability to innovate without him. Both of those issues are about to be quashed in the most absolute and indisputable ways possible. The outcome is obvious.

      /not a big fan of the company or its products, but I calls 'em like I sees 'em.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    17. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a fairly idiotic comment. "Apple's fucked". Really? You don't have anywhere else to go than "fucked" for that company? Nice digital logic; let's see how that works out for your stock portfolio.

      So according to you, with $137bn in cash reserves (1/3 their market cap), and a more profitable quarter than the same time last year, they are on an irrevocable death spiral? And based on iPhone 5 being slightly disappointing, and a handful of production issues, you think there is no possibility that they might come out with something more innovative within the next year or two?

      This isn't market analysis. This is anti-fanboyism,

      As for Google Glasses - because Google flashes its panties to strangers and Apple doesn't, that means Apple isn't wearing any? Your question, "what's Apple's answer to that?" is valid, but your assumption that they have none because you don't know about it is naive to the point of stupidity.

    18. Re:On the other end... by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      With Apple's market cap sitting at over USD $400 billion, there's a pretty short list of outfits that even could pay. Further, market capitalization is simply the product of the share price and the number of shares outstanding. It's worth what the market says it's worth, and it's certainly not an island in terms of bubble characteristics if that was truly where you were trying to take the conversation.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    19. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's stock was vastly overvalued last year, so it has dropped back to a more reasonable level. It is still higher than it was at the start of 2012, that is hardly what I'd call punishment, it is merely a correction.

    20. Re:On the other end... by WampagingWabbits · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's because they never learned from their biggest mistake, and appear doomed to continue repeating it?

      1. Create market leading products (Apple computer)
      2. Make large profits from customers
      3. Keep everything to themselves in a tightly closed environment
      4. Get steamrolled by more open competition (IBM et al / Microsoft)
      5. Start downward spiral towards bankruptcy

      So what do they do this time around:

      1. Create market leading products (iPhone/iPad)
      2. Make large profits from customers
      3. Keep everything to themselves in a tightly closed environment
      4. Get steamrolled by more open competition (Samsung et al / Google)
      5. ???

      Perhaps if they went easier on 2 and skipped 3 they wouldn't hit 4 and 5?

    21. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Apple just had a bit of a bubble if you look at the 1/2 year chart.

      http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=AAPL+Interactive#symbol=aapl;range=2y;compare=;indicator=volume;charttype=area;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=undefined;

      Its no wonder the stock price is dropping. Its going back to something more sensible.

    22. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple pissed off Samsung and lost their best supplier of quality parts.

      I think you mean, "Samsung pissed off Apple and lost it's biggest customer."

      Also, people said the same doom and gloom crap after the iPod came out, and look what's happened since. You simply don't know what Apple is working on, but you can bet it'll be something that will revolutionize yet another industry. They've done it time and time again, and I'm sorry if it doesn't happen at the Call of Duty-style annual pace that you demand of them.

    23. Re:On the other end... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      There's a company that pumped the highest profit in a quarter without pumping oil. Massive cash pile, no debt. And Wall Street continues to punish it. Wall Street wants bloods.

      Of course. How else will they show us who's boss?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    24. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of those issues are about to be quashed in the most absolute and indisputable ways possible.

      Making Dick Tracy's wristwatch a reality may pump their stock price for a bit, but it's still a stupid gimmick. Tim Cook just doesn't have "it".

    25. Re:On the other end... by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      Apple's os looks the same as it did 5 years ago

      Apple should change it for change's sake. It worked so well for Gnome, KDE and Windows 8!

      They did, and created a lot of features that were done just badly enough to be annoying. Examples are the war on color and contrast in the favorites sidebar, and the disappearing/reappearing scroll bars that make it a pain to select the bottom item in a window. Others include breaking search on both the desktop (it doesn't default to filename, and the popup for "filename contains..." comes up just slow enough to be really annoying) and in os x mail.

    26. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason that the bottom hasn't dropped out yet for Apple(as per their usual cycle) is that there must be some vestigial remnant of Stevey's reality distortion field.

      I gave up on Apple LONG ago after staying out the lies wrt gaming on MacOS, was more disillusioned by the removal of the ability to strip out Apple's egregiously overpriced parts on desktops(you know like back in the day when I could strip a tower down to sub $1k and then upgrade for still under $1k for what Apple was charging $2k+ from those little things like $500 hdd upgrades(which cost me retail c. $100), etc.), and the last straw was the removal of removable batts from notebooks.

      Their current notebooks suck, with the oh so wonder Intel integrated GPU reliance, and the usual grossly inflated price.

      I really can't see Apple coughing up anything interesting, although without Stevey's interference some cool projects might actually make it today, as remember when Stevey was alive everything had to pass the Stevey test and he killed off as many cool projects as he did bad ones, maybe even more potentially cool ones than bad ones as he became rather conservative towards the end leaning on notebooks, iphone, and ipods.

    27. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, people. Stocks move up and down because there is a fixed supply of shares.

      Imagine a merchant selling widgets. He only has a fixed number of widgets and he can never have more. He makes money by selling the widgets. What is he to do when he has no more widgets? Buy them back from the people that he sold them to. How he does this is his toolbox.

      Hype and rising prices causes people to buy the widgets. Fear and falling prices causes those people to sell them back to the merchant. This works well as the merchant will want to sell to the people as the price is rising and will want to buy them back as the price is falling. The town crier will create the hype and fear. You just need to manipulate that however is necessary (money should do the trick). The prices can be manipulated by the merchant in a number of ways. Especially if he has friends buying and selling at certain prices. They only need to start the momentum in one direction and the fear/hype will carry it the rest of the way. There is money to be made if you know the agreed upon turning points in the price. You just need a big downtick or uptick to fool the public.

      Now some more merchants have started selling other types of these widgets. They can collude and help each other manipulate prices. As the system grows, they start to make indexes that are composed of the prices of entire groups of widget types. Now it's even easier to manipulate prices of individual widgets by captivating the public with indexes. Easier to instill fear and hype that way.

      I'm not wasting time to explain further in this post that will surely be modded down. It only takes a moment of thought and observation of financial news networks to know what the system is designed to do.

      Here is a list of the founding fathers of this brilliant system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttonwood_Agreement

      BTW, the price gaps on the stock chart are the signposts to navigate this system. Find a gap. Find another gap. Draw a line through the gaps. Now scale your chart and line along each axis using your charting software so that the angle of that line is either 30, 45, or 60 degrees either up or down. You want to scale it as little as possible to hit one of these values. You shouldn't have to change the aspect ratio much. Make sure you are looking at about a year of data. Now once you have set the scale, draw lines of 30, 45, and 60 degrees from each gap going both up and down. Marvel at how these lines go right through other gaps in the past and the future. You will also see that some of these lines serve as support and resistance lines. It's still pretty difficult to trade on this, as you don't know if the issue will stop moving at one of these lines or gap through it or move through it without a gap. This exercise is only to demonstrate a peculiar observation. There are a few books that talk about this technique in detail, but they are no longer in print. Start with The Wall Street Jungle.

    28. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are beginning to think that Apple is a one-trick pony. While companies like Google are getting better at design AND releasing proof of concepts like Glass, Fiber, all Apple's done in the last few years is release the same product they unveiled 4-5 years ago in different sizes.

    29. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovate? When did they do that? Minor tweaks to the UI here and there, but nothing out of the ordinary.

      Steve was an "excellent" sales person, nothing more. I have "excellent" in quotes simply because he told the most convincing lies to those who want to be lied to. See: Voice assistant lawsuit (learning to play a guitar LOL). See: 3G false advertising (a complex web page page loading in 3 seconds on 3G? LOL)

    30. Re:On the other end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps people will realize that that $137B came out of THEIR pockets and realize that there are equally good products out there that don't give so much of their money to companies.

      You also must realize that the mwjx is speaking the truth...

      The Nexus One had a secondary noise cancelling mic. The i4 comes out with one.
      Android in general is based off of wide-screen aspect ratio. The i5 comes out with one.
      All other devices have had a small power multipurpose plug. The i5 comes out with one.

      Bet your bottom dollar that wireless charging and an NFC competitor will be included in the 5xyz in a few months, probably with their own standard and cost twice as much just because Fuck your wallet.

    31. Re:On the other end... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      They've done it time and time again, and I'm sorry if it doesn't happen at the Call of Duty-style annual pace that you demand of them.

      Correction: When Steve Jobs was leading Apple, they've done it time and time again.

      He isn't any more.

      I've seen nothing that suggests that current Apple is capable of innovating anything. They've done nothing innovative since Steve Jobs stepped down.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    32. Re:On the other end... by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      Well, apple employees are paid partly in apple shares. A falling stock price makes it harder for apple to attract staff.

    33. Re:On the other end... by quenda · · Score: 1

      Well, apple employees are paid partly in apple shares. A falling stock price makes it harder for apple to attract staff.

      If only they had something else to pay them with.

    34. Re:On the other end... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's probably because in five years, there is really no idea where that company may be. They could the retake the largest company crown and beyond with great new fashionable products, or they could be a total has-been stomped into the ground by their competition and shunned by past customers for their lousy business practices. Unlike, say, the oil companies where everyone has a pretty good idea where they'll be in five years.

    35. Re:On the other end... by Tamerlin · · Score: 1

      Samsung does make great components... but their products are cheesy shit.

      Apple may suck... but everyone else is so fucking far behind them whatever point you think you're trying to make is completely moot.

      The flaw in reasoning here is that Apple uses components that companies like Samsung make in their own products. Apple makes other companies' products look nice, like calling IEEE-1394 "FireWire" instead of IEEE-1394.

      Other companies aren't behind Apple in the way that you imply; they're behind Apple in that their products enable Apple's.

    36. Re:On the other end... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Eventually an old cow runs dry.

      Just like Apple is going to without Saint Jobs to anoint their next product.

  5. If Groupon was Battletoads by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I nominate this for nerd meme of 2013. If slashdot was battletoads. If the republican national convention was battletoads. If shopping at Wal-Mart was battletoads. And then all those of us who never played it will have to make friends with gamefaqs all over again to understand WTF everyone is talking about.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I played it like 25 years ago and don't remember much of it either so you're in good company.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

      I nominate this for nerd meme of 2013. If slashdot was battletoads. If the republican national convention was battletoads. If shopping at Wal-Mart was battletoads. And then all those of us who never played it will have to make friends with gamefaqs all over again to understand WTF everyone is talking about.

      There hasn't been a Battletoads game released since 1994 but recently Battletoads has seen reemergence on boards like 4chan and Reddit. It has been used by Anonymous to prank scientology.

      I'd imagine he could have included that in there to try to make himself look like an average guy who's in on all the jokes (not the reality). It has also been used for trolling -- perhaps he was trolling? Put up a screenshot of Battletoads and ask "Is this Battletoads?"

      And then there's also the possibility that he really likes the game, wants to see a sequel and therefore decides that he can give it a ton of publicity by mentioning it in his farewell e-mail.

      Who knows or cares at this point?

      I found this hilarious from the article:

      In addition, Mason also has support on the eight-member board — director and former AOL exec Ted Leonsis has always been a key mentor to him, for example.

      What is this? Game of Thrones?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Funny

      This CEO is a clown! Drafting up a final email referencing...Battletoads?! WTF? Talk about random.

      Shampo and wrench! Nope, I can't pull it off like he can.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure that 'being CEO of a company built on skimming a percentage of the profits from businesses willing to lose money and make it up in volume' is epic trolling on a scale that most trolls will never even be able to dream of...

    5. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "were", not was FFS.

    6. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I had to google it to.

      Still better than a car analogy though.

    7. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by archen · · Score: 1

      But what if the car were Battletoads?

    8. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by guttentag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Groupon was Battletoads, it would be short-lived, fictitious, and not popular with today's consumers. Maybe Groupon is Battletoads.

    9. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "were", not was FFS.

      By the standard rules of memes, it's irrelevant whether you're correct.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by guttentag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work with someone who was close to Ted Leonsis. Ted's great infamous achievement is that he came up with the idea of blanketing the country in AOL disks. He made a lot of money at AOL and then got into buying DC-area sports teams. The media often liked to hold him up as a tech sector golden boy, but I can assure you that being close to Ted Leonsis is no guarantee of success. If anything, I find it interesting that Groupon's CEO was "mentored" by Ted, because I always thought the way Groupon advertised their coupon service was as strangely pervasive as AOL disks were. Put out enough and you're bound to get some return.

    11. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by geekoid · · Score: 1, Troll

      OMG, referencing an old game for humor! Computer nerds would never act that way!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

      Put out enough and you're bound to get some return.

      That's what she said!

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    13. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      And much like Battletoads Groupon seemed really cool at first, only to get frustratingly difficult very quickly to the point that most people just gave up.

    14. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Haven't logged into Slashdot in just short of forever, but I see that you're my foe. To the death!

    15. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The analogy between Battletoads and Groupon goes even deeper. Just as Battletoads had an infamous bug that prevented Player 2 from completing Level 11 (they would just sit motionless until they lost all their lives), Groupon looks like in the near future it will be stuck in Chapter 11.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    16. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Haven't logged into Slashdot in just short of forever, but I see that you're my foe. To the death!

      I wonder who started it. Die, scum!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I had to google it to" ... what, exactly? It's "too", FFS :-)

    18. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop it !!!
      Newfags

    19. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Let's roll with it. If Groupon had been Battletoads... presumably it wasn't even a candidate for Battletoadsiness by the time he quit.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    20. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 1

      In South Korea only old people play Battletoads.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    21. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I'm from Sweden. I could had written också =P

      Only time I use too is for excessive. I don't know how it should be used beyond that :)

      Saw this http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/too but I can't say I really get the fourth one and I won't remember it all anyway.

      It's worse when it happen in my native language but it likely do there to. Especially since I just write how I speak so to say. Like this.

      If I had spell- and grammatics checker maybe I would do better =P

    22. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by fatphil · · Score: 1

      And "were" isn't singularly "correct" either. One is not obliged to use the subjunctive mood wherever it's fitting. If it was used everywhere it's possible to use it, then the English language would look and sound very strange indeed. Personally, I like it, and I use it a lot, but I still probably only use it a quarter of the number of times that I could.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    23. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominate this for nerd meme of 2013. If slashdot was battletoads. If the republican national convention was battletoads. If shopping at Wal-Mart was battletoads.

      A read nerd would properly use the subjunctive. If slashdot were battletoads. If the republican national convention were battletoads. If shopping at Wal-Mart were battletoads.

    24. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Man, the sad part is that I enjoy watching old-school gaming speed runs, and watched this one not too long ago, so I know the exact part he's talking about.

      And I DID play this game as a kid. That part of the game was hell. I think I only made it through a handful of times, before we had to return the game... back when we rented NES games.

      But there's no reason to try to read the walkthrough at GameFAQs... that's just boring. Watching speed runs... man some of the stuff those guys pull off, it's insane. And no cheating at Speed Demos Archive. Just pure, unrelenting skill and practice. Especially awesome if you're watching a playthrough of a game that kicked the crap out of you in the past (looking at you, Iron Tank).

    25. Re:If Groupon was Battletoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Game of Throngs

  6. They should have taken the $6B from Google by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2 years ago Google offered $5B to $6B to buy Groupon. Groupon turned them down and today their market cap is $3B. Oops.

    1. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure that's really what happened. I'll bet it's more like Google looked at their books, said "WTF???" and let Groupon "back away" from the deal to save face.

    2. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overpriced. Google should have offered half a billion at most.

    3. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I got a business to run here, and only so much space in inventory. Lemme call a buddy of mine who's an expert on overpriced dot-coms.

    4. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying they should've waited for the Groupon on Groupon?

    5. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm not sure that's really what happened. I'll bet it's more like Google looked at their books, said "WTF???" and let Groupon "back away" from the deal to save face.

      That's a very real possibility. Another possibility is that Andrew Mason really did turn down Google's offer because he knew it would kill his scam. Google isn't just going to walk in and hand them a check for $6 Billion. There's a lot of "due diligence".

      Groupon was cooking the books, losing money but showing profitability. Mason was probably worried that if word got out that Google killed the deal because of what they found, Groupon would be tainted and that could put a serious damper on their IPO.

      Don't cry for Andrew Mason, the fired CEO. Thanks to Groupon's IPO he leaves a pretty wealthy guy. Which is what this was really all about all along.

    6. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Those were known problems at the time of their IPO. Anyone who bought into it was either gambling ("I bet someone else is a bigger idiot than me!") or should see a doctor about their color blindness. Since they ignored all those red flags.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    7. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Is he a time traveler from 2000? You might want to give him a tip about the impending crash...

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by alen · · Score: 1

      Not a scam, just a crappy business model
      Most group one I see are over priced and from places I would never give my business to. The good deals are long gone because any good business will have repeat customers

    9. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if Google's stock isn't overpriced. Maybe they drank their own Kool Aid.

    10. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by fldsofglry · · Score: 3, Informative

      A couple of reasons the deal didn't work out: http://www.businessinsider.com/groupon-google-deal-turn-down-2012-6 Supposedly, a break up fee of $800 million dollars wasn't enough for groupon to want the deal, and Google was afraid of being in antitrust court for years over whether the deal would actually go through. I was also told by a source somewhat close to the matter that Google wanted to groupon to offer a "break up fee" as insurance in case groupon's books weren't on the up and up. Some say that "insurance fee" sealed the fate of the deal as groupon didn't want Google to see their accounting procedures.

    11. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, even The Economist was calling it a dubious IPO before it happened. There's a lot of fool parted of their money by that venture.

    12. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      As if ANY stock ain't overpriced. That's what you get when your stock value isn't tied to how well your products fare but only to how much you manage to trump the expectations of some fortune tellers.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Not a scam, just a crappy business model
      Most group one I see are over priced and from places I would never give my business to. The good deals are long gone because any good business will have repeat customers

      The scam was the IPO, not the business model.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    14. Re:They should have taken the $6B from Google by Raenex · · Score: 1

      There as no scam, I'm not sure why you think there was.

      If I was an investor and my money was promptly used to pay off the founders instead of investing in the company I would feel scammed.

  7. What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the company that managed the takes the credibility hit it deserves.

    Despite increased revenues, they are still losing about $81 million each quarter, and Wall Street needs blood.

    This company has always been a sham. There aren't enough new businesses able to soak up the cost of all the free-riders who use is coupon model as aan imainery marketing opportunity to keep Groupon alive long enough to make it to profitability and keep it there. It's stock price has been a wonderful short sale opportunity since say one. The fact that anyone was convince to believe otherwise is a testimony to the magnitude of the ignorance upon which Wall Street constructed the real estate backed investment banking scam of the century.

    Of course investors want a (blood) pay-off. Why else do you think they bought the stock to begin with? When the actual truth behind a comany whose expenses continue to rise faster than its revenue, what else would you expect? Groupon's fraudulent (but legal while it was private) accounting practices weren't corrected until after it went public, and the first thing that happened after that was the stock tanked by about 50%.

  8. Soooooo by roboticbebop · · Score: 2

    .. does this mean that everybody's caught on to their predatory business model?

    1. Re:Soooooo by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      does this mean that everybody's caught on to their predatory business model?

      No, not everybody. Just those who haven't seen it from day zero.

    2. Re:Soooooo by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing is, they could probably stand to make a lot of money if they weren't quite so predatory. I think that for the most part, the people who bought the groupons were quite happy. However, the businesses who offered the groupons often got shafted. I'm sure they could easily change the way they they deal with businesses to make sure they have a much better experience. For instance, most of the time they push for no limits on the number of coupons sold. Instead, there should always be a limit, because most businesses aren't set up to handle the amount of business that Groupon could send to them. Groupon would still make money off the deal, and would probably even have some repeat business.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Soooooo by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      .. does this mean that everybody's caught on to their predatory business model?

      It's worse than that: Not only is their business model predatory, it has a low first-mover advantage and minimal barriers to entry(and to the degree that the barriers are there, other people are way beyond them).

      There is nothing stopping a bevy of more-or-less-exact imitators ('livesocial' and friends); but there is also nothing stopping the people who already issue the consumer's credit card and the small businesses' hosted-payroll service from spinning something ('Bank Amerideals(tm)').

      Groupon was doubly screwed: not only are they vultures who are ultimately bad for the people they depend on to offer further offers, they are less efficient and well placed vultures than those who are already well entrenched. Bank of America, or any other major financial institution/credit card issuer, aren't creative enough to know their asses from a hole in the ground; but they are trivially better placed than groupon to skim a few extra percentage points from the transactions they already skim a few percentage points from.

    4. Re:Soooooo by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The thing is, they could probably stand to make a lot of money if they weren't quite so predatory. I think that for the most part, the people who bought the groupons were quite happy. However, the businesses who offered the groupons often got shafted. I'm sure they could easily change the way they they deal with businesses to make sure they have a much better experience. For instance, most of the time they push for no limits on the number of coupons sold. Instead, there should always be a limit, because most businesses aren't set up to handle the amount of business that Groupon could send to them. Groupon would still make money off the deal, and would probably even have some repeat business.

      Even if Groupon were less "predatory" it's still a bad deal for businesses. Businesses are losing money on every sale that uses a Groupon based on the hope that it will generate repeat business. But a couple of years experience with Groupon has shown that it just doesn't happen.

      People go in, get their good deal, and then move on to the next deal. That's not theory or opinion, those are the words of the many business owners who lost a lot of money dealing with Groupon.

    5. Re:Soooooo by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you keep cutting and pasting that?

      Not all business lost money on every sale. Stupid ones that offered to much did. That's not Groupons fault, and Groupon isn't predetory.

      Yes, some idiot decides they are going to sell cup caked to an unlimited number of people for a dime, they are going to lose money.

      Of course, it never occurs to them to put a volume limit, or simply close earl;y when they realize they have made a mistake.

      It's all groupon's fault.
      I talk about this to every place I use a groupon at.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Soooooo by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The business doesn't have to offer a price so low they are losing money. That's just another thing that Groupon pushes them to do. Groupon could operate similar services while ensuring that the business actually made a profit off each sale, as well as ensure that they weren't overwhelmed with more business than they can handle. There's plenty of cases where Groupon can be good for the business. I noticed my local rock climbing gym on there. They don't really have an expendables. Sure their equipment will undergo a bit more use, and their staff might be a little busier training newbs on how to belay, but if they introduce a couple new people to the sport, and get a couple memberships out of the deal, they most likely end up ahead. It's not like there's another rock climbing gym for the people to go to anywhere in the area.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:Soooooo by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      For no particular reason I'm going to toot my own horn -- I can't say I *saw* Groupon failing, but was certainly hoping for it:

              Re:This is what we value in this country (Score:1)
              by iMadeGhostzilla (1851560) on Saturday March 19 2011, @01:05AM (#35538564)
              > This is what we value in this country. Companies that spam coupons for the masses to buy more shit they don't need.
              Thank you! I thought I was going crazy seeing how so many people even *here* think it's cool, and these are people who are used to creating value. If I ever wanted to see a concept fail, it's this one.

    8. Re:Soooooo by Viceice · · Score: 2

      In the end, Groupon is just a marketing tool. It's up to you to be smart about using it. If repeat business does not happen, it's more likely a weakness of your business model than Groupon's fault.

      I once bought a coupon for a restaurant. The food was bad and when I complained, I was insulted by the owner.

      Needless to say, I did not go back, and it's really not Groupons fault.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    9. Re:Soooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the meantime, I enjoyed all the cheap deals I got :)

    10. Re:Soooooo by Kasar · · Score: 1

      Winning a customer at a loss never works out, look at how badly Amazon is doing after many years of losses.
      It's all in the business planning, and nobody is forced to sign up with Groupon for marketing, any more than they're forced to advertise in grocery store circulars. Simply reading the requirements should tell the business if they can make their system work for them.

      Flight schools were losing money on flights since the cost didn't even cover fuel, but they apparently got enough students to cover it since they still run them occasionally.

      --
      vi? Who's that?
    11. Re:Soooooo by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Cheap?

      Companies, by the very rules of the market, cannot sell you anything cheaper than another company could provided they have the same production cost, which is usually the case if quality and service is on par. They can only reduce the price and still make a profit if that original price was already higher than they needed to ask. So, essentially, if you got a "good price", all it means is that before they screwed you over.

      But maybe it's true, people don't care what they have to pay for something, what they care for is how much they pay less...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Soooooo by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I think that for the most part, the people who bought the groupons were quite happy.

      I have bought a few groupons (mostly fancy dinner offers) and was quite happy with the deals. So yes, I can confirm that. My wife has bought several more and I've never heard any complains from her about it.

      However after buying a few of those Groupons, you quickly realise that the price you pay is a good price for the dinner the restaurant serves you. It is not a very special deal, really. You get maybe 10-20% discount on what such a meal would normally cost, but then the restaurant only sells it on their slow weekdays and has the restaurant full of people that all have the choice of just four meals.

      The "original price" on which you get 50-70% discount is just hugely overpriced for what you get, and doesn't make any sense. I've also seen laptops offered on Groupon, at 30% discount, well a quick Google search turned up the exact same laptop with a regular price only marginally higher than the Groupon price ($10-30 on a $7000 (US$900) laptop).

    13. Re:Soooooo by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Two big exceptions to your rule, which apply to a lot of Groupons:

      (1) You are getting a deal at the expense of some less informed person getting screwed.
      (2) The company is stupid and actually isn't making a profit, in the hopes that you will come back for return business. You don't. You win.

    14. Re:Soooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding!

      My wife and I got a Groupon for a local resturant we wanted to try, and they were very nice. Right up till we let the waitress know we had a Groupon.

      We ended up getting put in the worst table in the entire resturant because we had a child with us, "to keep us seperate from the other customers". yeah, red flags right there. I ordered a steak Medium and it came to the table still mooing. When I asked to send it back the manager came to the table and asked why I felt it wasn't medium, then asked us to leave because we were being 'distruptive'.

      I ended up not using the Groupon, because I refused to pay for food that wasn't cooked, and we walked out. The look in that guy's eyes when we mentioned the Groupon i'll never forget...was like I had walked in and slapped him in the face. If he didn't want to accept them..why sign up for it?

    15. Re:Soooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he didn't want to accept them..why sign up for it?

      Groupon used high pressure sales tactics to convince businesses to sell goods at below cost and give Groupon money for the right to do it. Most businesses felt burned and as the stories spread, Groupon started to fail. This is the problem with their "predatory business model" mentioned up thread. I'm not sure what your question is. The businesses felt screwed over. They were losing money on the food and you were never going to come back.

  9. Funny, but I am reminded of the old joke... by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always hated him, but I'll go to his funeral just to make sure he's really dead.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Funny, but I am reminded of the old joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know anything about him, but it was the best CEO firing letter ever.

      After four and a half intense and wonderful years as CEO of Groupon, I've decided that I'd like to spend more time with my family. Just kidding - I was fired today. If you're wondering why... you haven't been paying attention.

      and

      For those who are concerned about me, please don't be - I love Groupon, and I'm terribly proud of what we've created. I'm OK with having failed at this part of the journey. If Groupon was Battletoads, it would be like I made it all the way to the Terra Tubes without dying on my first ever play through. I am so lucky to have had the opportunity to take the company this far with all of you. I'll now take some time to decompress (FYI I'm looking for a good fat camp to lose my Groupon 40, if anyone has a suggestion), and then maybe I'll figure out how to channel this experience into something productive.

      I'm sure he made plenty of cash and now is a good time to get the hell away from GroupOn, toxic as it is.

  10. Hero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Battletoads analogy is accurate, this man is my hero. That game was fucking tough.

  11. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats Groupon?

    1. Re:Huh? by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      Whats Groupon?

      It's one of those quick and dirty dating sites.

    2. Re:Huh? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      No, you're thinking of Gropeon

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  12. Battletoads, eh? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a theory of what the CEO was doing instead of fixing up Groupon.

  13. Battletoads? by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now own up, who googled Battletoads?

  14. Yes! by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's see, a company who cons small business into bad decisions by taking advantage of their inability to quickly do an ROI and assess risk, is themselves falling ill to their unmitigated growth and overhead.

    How much could it cost to run a company that just sells coupons?

    1. Re:Yes! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      if poor people can't do basic ROI in there head on the fly, they are going to have a hard time succeeding.

      Well, duh. Why do you think they are poor/small business?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Judging by the sheer amount of Pro-Groupon turfing you've been doing I'm guessing you've got money invested in them, or are just completely clueless. The entire model is geared to push retailers to short-sell their products or services, it's a lowest-bidder war between the merchants who are putting them out. Groupon also aggressively markets to businesses which are already on the verge of failing, using a line of basically "well it's worth a last ditch effort" and as long as they don't close shop in a week Groupon makes their money and the buyer get fucked as well.

      You also obviously don't understand the mind of the Coupon hunter- they are not going to PAY good money for a coupon if it's not a damn good deal. So what if I can save 10% to re-carpet my living room? I can get that deal any where in town. But when you're offering it at 50% of the best offer the competition runs, I might just decide it's time for some new floor coverings.

      But arguing with you is rather pointless, people have seen Groupon, tried it, and walked away with a bad taste in their mouth. The stock price is tanking because all they are doing is spending more and more cash with less and less to show for it. So 'turf away, Mr. Shill, 'turf away... if you do it enough who knows... You might get your next purchase of Astroturf for 25% the normal rate!

    3. Re:Yes! by fermion · · Score: 2
      In fact we have seen examples of Groupon developing deals with small businesses that have absolutely no value to the business. The deals are not structured to build long term loyalty, rather to provide a significant increase in sales over a short period of time but a price that does not cover costs.

      My question for Groupon is how can they sell a product that essentially costs nothing, with the provider of the coupon taking all the risk, and still not make a profit. It seems to me that they must be an issue with management for them to blow through all that cash.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good grief, has no one on here even had a job yet?

      It's obvious how they can blow through cash. They have a non-scalable business model. Sure, the customer side is highly scalable, being "just an internet business", but the supply side is incredibly labour-intensive. To run a national company doing national deals requires a national-scale workforce, and you can't use minimum wage workers for this, even if they are "just on the phone all day". If that "essentially costs nothing" then obviously they'd be making huge profits. Only problem is, it doesn't.

  15. Battletoads! by rhazz · · Score: 2

    That's a classy (nerdy) way to go out! To lend weight to the Battletoads analogy, Terra Tubes is level 9 and this is level 3. As you'll see it is nearly impossible to succeed without knowing what is ahead of you. Normally you would have to fail many times before you learned enough about the upcoming obstacles to get through.

    1. Re:Battletoads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That level was SO hard!

    2. Re:Battletoads! by Ranganana · · Score: 1

      Word on that!

      --
      Red een boom, Eet een bever!
    3. Re:Battletoads! by benthurston27 · · Score: 1

      that made me think what if that level were randomly generated each time so you could never memorize it, it would drive people mad...

  16. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is Oklahoma with having failed?

  17. Google? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    My search-fu is down at the moment, but iirc Google made an offer to buy them, why would they decline if they're in such dire straights?

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    1. Re:Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My search-fu is down at the moment, but iirc Google made an offer to buy them, why would they decline if they're in such dire straights?

      1. Because that offer was made before Groupon was going to issue and IPO (a couple years ago, not now after years of losing money)
      2. Because Google proposed to make an offer contingent on looking at the books.
      3. Because Groupon probably thought that if the Google deal fell through, the $800M breakup fee wouldn't compensate for the financial damage as being perceived to be damaged goods vs the upside.

      I'm sure that original offer from Google isn't still on the table after all these years...

  18. try Ghost N' Goblins (NES) - by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 2

    this is one of those 'take your controller out of the NES socket and throw it across the room' hard.

    1. Re:try Ghost N' Goblins (NES) - by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or basically any of the sequels to Contra. The original wasn't too horrible, but in any of the later and fancier games, if you didn't know what was where you were going to die.

      I am so thankful that today we have games with more replay value than rote platformers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:try Ghost N' Goblins (NES) - by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Yeah I remember that. Two hits and you were dead, and it wasn't like mario where you could recover that last hit with mushrooms everywhere, rather your "mushrooms" were very hard to find. Plus you had to make it through the WHOLE level without taking those two hits, and they were long.

      Still though I couldn't stop playing that game. There was this big hole in the first level where you had to avoid this demon with wings while you made your way over it, and it was such a bitch that I rarely made it passed it without glitching him. Basically you had to just barely nudge your screen to where you could see a tiny part of him and then spear him to death because he wouldn't move until your screen went over a bit more.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  19. "Leaks"?! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Goddammit! Stop it! You hear me? Just stop it!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:"Leaks"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up please someone please

  20. If Microsoft was Battletoads by Tackhead · · Score: 0

    I nominate this for nerd meme of 2013. If slashdot was battletoads. If the republican national convention was battletoads. If shopping at Wal-Mart was battletoads. And then all those of us who never played it will have to make friends with gamefaqs all over again to understand WTF everyone is talking about.

    I'm in.

    If Microsoft was Battletoads, it would be like the rat army working for a chair-throwing Big Blag.

  21. Nerd doesn't make it back to the 90's anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe I'm that sad that I knew exactly where he got to. My question for him is if he used the warps? Ah, nevermind. Even if he did warp this is quite the impossible feat to get to the first time you play Battletoads.

    Go get yourselves an emulator and try to get out of the second area let alone to the Terra Tubes.

  22. The Latest Ponzi Scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groupon = Cyberrebate

  23. Battletoads and Small Businesses by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    My brother and I spent hours playing this game on NES. One of the things that made it so hard was no saves -- something that my brother and I would enforce on Halo in legendary mode when we got older. The hover motorcycles were fun; the art was intriguing. It was an amazing game and probably the most fun I've had with co-op. I don't know why they never tired to recreate this -- as long as it remains in 2D instead of 3D.

    As far as the Groupon thing, I don't have much sympathy. I have a few entrepreneur friends. Groupon "recruiters" have harassed all of them relentlessly, while exclaiming that their competitors would get an upper hand from it. However, in reality, Groupon is pretty shit for small businesses. For big businesses, it probably is good since they have a lot of money to throw around, but then this screws over small businesses even more. I'm not spouting out theory; I've had actual friends affected by this. I never use Groupon unless I know that there's not a local small business competitor in the area, but I admit that this probably ruins it for entrepreneurs thinking about starting a new small business in the area.

    --
    The G
    1. Re:Battletoads and Small Businesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly is groupon so horrible? It is a fucking coupon that you control and set limits on how many coupons to distribute. If your margin is so thin that you cannot afford to offer discounts to attract new customers, then chances are your business won't be afloat for much longer. Groupon is really a marketing program, and one with a fairly decent and active community in it.

  24. Great analogy by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

    If Groupon was Battletoads, it would be like I made it all the way to the Terra Tubes without dying on my first ever play through.

    It is just like that especially if the consequences for dying in battletoads was losing $81 million each quarter. Usually when stakes are high, you don't get someone who's playing the game for the first time to be in charge.

  25. Ok, it's my fault he left. by suprcvic · · Score: 1

    I unsubscribed from all future emails from Groupon yesterday. Pretty sure that was the straw that broke the camels back for him.

  26. What ? by nu1x · · Score: 1

    I played the Game Boy version as a kid on a yellow/green GB, the memories and trauma runs deep.

    I only made it to the third level (the one after bike level, oh the nightmares) twice (or three times).

    So yeah. My nerd cred is still intact,

    (for those not in the know, the original Battletoads is arguably one of the most unfairly hard games ever made, next to Ghouls'n'Ghosts and ilk. except more unfair) (also Takeshi's Challenge does not count, for it was just a troll)

    --
    I have nothing to lose but my bindings.
  27. talking about quarters the arcade ver was better by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    talking about quarters the arcade ver was better and had kick ass music from the BSMT2000 chip.

  28. Battletoads?!?!? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    I nominate this for nerd meme of 2013. If slashdot was battletoads. If the republican national convention was battletoads. If shopping at Wal-Mart was battletoads. And then all those of us who never played it will have to make friends with gamefaqs all over again to understand WTF everyone is talking about.

    If this new meme you are pushing were battletoads, it would have crashed at the load screen.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  29. pet food dot com take two by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    the only reviews I have ever read by businesses for groupon have been that they lose huge amounts of money if they use the service. How can groupon losing money be a surprise?

    1. Re:pet food dot com take two by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I have heard before that Groupon takes a 50% cut of most actions (as in: 50% of the amount spent by the customer when buying a Groupon). Sounds big, must vary per product as mostly margins are not that great.

      Then the "original price" is of course fake. That's just a feel-good number.

      Groupon collects the money the moment you spend it, and pays the company that provides the service/goods three months later. Great for Groupon's cash flow, of course! And the risk is wholly at their partner's side as if Groupon goes bankrupt it's not likely the already sold deals are cancelled. Customers will demand their goods or their dinner they have a Groupon for.

      Actually I have no idea what Groupon's costs are but it should not be too high, unless they have a huge and overcompensated sales force around. The business model at least sounds very profitable from Groupon's pov, and very bad for the company whose products they promote.

    2. Re:pet food dot com take two by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      my point is how many businesses are going to continue to use or recommend a service that is a financial disaster for them? groupon is a bad business model and stinks a bit of a scam.

  30. Dear Mr. Mason, by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

    how much money did you take home after taxes for your "failed" year in 2012? After answering the question, remind me why I should be concerned about you.
    End Of File.

    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  31. I'm sure banning all gun-related deals by Grimbleton · · Score: 2

    has greatly helped their profits!

  32. How is that possible? by fullback · · Score: 1

    Here is what's wrong with business today.

    How can Groupon lose $81 million every three months and still be in business? Where is the money coming from to pay the bills?

    I started a business a year ago and have been profitable, and grown consistently, every month. And yet, not a single bank will talk to me about a loan to expand.

    I guess I need to lose some big money before they'll talk to me...

  33. Investors are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now they care about profits? How is it that a company with huge profits and cash on hand like Apple can be worth 60% or so less than a few months ago compared to a company like Amazon that consistently takes quarterly losses and is at the peak of their stock value?

  34. Definitely should have taken the $6B from Google by Animats · · Score: 1

    Google has enough market power to make it work. If Google had bought Groupon, it would be called "Google Deals" and would appear at the top of every search result page vaguely relevant to the query. It would be tied into Google Groups, Google Maps, Google+, Google Chrome, and Google Anal Probe. Businesses would sign up or else.

  35. That's because it wouldn't have happened by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    See with a buyout offer, there's a lot too it. It isn't like when Google says "We'll give you $6 billion," that is final, that if Groupon says "Ok," Google has to hand over a check and it is done. No, rather it is the first step. Next step is the lawyers get together to draft some NDA type stuff, and then Google gets to go over what happens in the company. They get to look at the financials, the operations, all that shit. They get to have a real good look at what they are going to buy. Only if they are then happy, does it go on to a formal offer and then cash changing hands if that is signed.

    What Groupon knew would happen is Google would have a look at their books and realize they weren't making money, and had no plan as to how to. Google would then say "Ya, I'm thinking: no," and back out. That would screw over any IPO because people would ask "Well hang on, what did Google see that was wrong?"

    They figured, correctly, that if they just went public they could pull a fast one on people and get some cash. It appears they were right.

  36. Apple does need some new and big things by symbolset · · Score: 1

    I think they have them. We shall see.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  37. Hmm... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    "If Groupon was Battletoads, it would be like I made it all the way to the Terra Tubes without dying on my first ever play through."

    Wow! He must have been the greatest CEO ever!

    Damn this economy.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  38. turning away business by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 1

    Seems like if your company is losing money, the last thing you want to do is cancel deals that are making you money.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/22/groupon-gun-deals_n_2527168.html

  39. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does a "business" whose method of operation involves not creating of having to store and move stock and simply take a cut lose money? How does one screw up up such a cash cow?

  40. Hi Web 2.0 Dotcom Bubble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been wondering when we'd see you.... Investors are no smarter now than they were after the first dotcom crash, so why wouldn't we expect another string of spectacular failures from your sector once equity built up in the market again?

    Maybe this isn't you coming, but stories like this sure make me wonder!

  41. What the hell? by WizADSL · · Score: 1

    I think Groupon is GREAT, if you're a consumer. For businesses not so much, Groupons are expensive to offer, if I'm not mistaken the vendor pays 50% of the discount value to Groupon as a fee. So if you offer a Groupon that entiles you to $100 worth of stuff for $50, then Groupon gets $25 from the vendor for each sale. From the vendors point of view, you just got $100 worth of stuff for $25, pretty straightforward. I'm sick and tired of reading about businesses that lost money by offering a Groupons, if you did then you don't have a grasp of simple math. You simply CAN'T offer a Groupon where you lose money, if you can't meet your costs in my example for the $25 you will actually keep, then you can't make the offer.

  42. Re:talking about quarters the arcade ver was bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talking about quarters the arcade ver was better and had kick ass music from the BSMT2000 chip.

    Rare, represent.

    Now I want that soundtrack.

  43. Battle Toads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol, that was a hard game and that tube level sucked.

  44. Re:talking about quarters the arcade ver was bette by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    talking about quarters the arcade ver was better and had kick ass music from the BSMT2000 chip.

    Rare, represent.

    Now I want that soundtrack.

    You can rip it useing mame or M1 and the roms.

  45. It isn't his fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have just given him all of the money and closed the company. The poor man won't be able to eat now. His employees are useless.

    --libman