As a reason for why Sweden isn't number one or what? Rent we even more poisoned? Though it may be an American trend at first. But we are always the leading progressives.
My dad died in pneumonia after having being given Risperdal while he had Alzheimers, something the FDA recommends against doing considering exactly that. I don't know if the manufacturer say so themselves but supposedly it is the case.
Zen CCX = four cores. Ryzen (4-8 cores) = Two CCX connected using infinity fabric on the same chip. ThreadRipper (8-16 cores) and Epyc (? - 32 cores) = Four Ryzen chips also connected with infinity fabric on the same interposer.
Ryzen 7 1st gen vs Intel i7 8th gen is something like 15% faster in multi-core vs 15% faster in gaming work-loads. About. There's variations like AVX (where Intel HEDT is faster still relative the i7) and games where the performance impact is closer to 40%. The Ryzen 7 chip and motherboard is cheaper. ThreadRipper socket is cool.
With Ryzen 2000-series for the "2600" engineering sample the clock was 200 MHz higher. Guess we'll see if it stop at that or not.
The AMD chips have a bit more PCI-express lanes and are less affected by this too.
So.. do as you want. For a specific use-case like a video program or sound-production which doesn't fully utilize additional cores and depend on more on per core performance or AVX maybe Intel is better. For multi-threaded ALU work and now maybe for virtualization and storage performance maybe AMD is better.
We'll all be winners if you buy AMD though. I guess.
As I understand it, Intel proposes to build in a switch in future CPU's which tells the CPU to stop being insecure. The switch is going to be off by default and must be switched on by the kernel during boot. Intel proposes to let all future CPU's be insecure by default.
Kinda weird considering how they also say fixing this won't make the chips perform much worse;D
and how exactly does that do anything at all to improve the situation? or are you suggesting Open source hardware would somehow be magically design flaw free?
Beyond the stuff in the summary for a lossy format the quality is still shit relative the competition and it's lossy to begin with. Looks more like shit than necessary and totally suck for text. What's the fucking reason to not replace it for new content?
No. Snowflakes are your kind. Also the racist, the anti-democrats, the freedom haters, the socialists, the dictators, the assholes, the dehumanizers, the authoritorian assholes,..
No I don't need a safe-space but I would like to have a space where I can tell you idiots how wrong and nasty you are.
I'm not free and I don't have any guns. I'm a Swede you see. I can't shoot stuff. Right now at-least. Of course you can get guns in Sweden too but the legal guns aren't all that great for taking down lots of people you don't like. There's of course a bunch of illegal guns in Sweden which work better for that purpose but those who have access to those are more likely the kind of people you associate with instead.
I grew up in a communist country and ran away - people with your mentality were our oppressors..
That make no sense.
media is plural already; what IS the obvious and only solution? spam on facebook?? nobody wants to treat you with respect - may be they start that way, but then you prove them wrong very fast
Social media is basically Facebook or Google. There's not really much alternatives to that. They own a bunch of other companies too and Twitter behaves just the same. Of course there _IS_ alternatives too but there you won't have any audience anyway. Also the governments control the media and support them and direct them anyway and alternatively the private companies running those media platforms have their own agendas and put even further limitations on... the lack of freedom of speech and take away even more of it. And of course beyond that you've got the moderators in whatever group on those pages or people who just sort what they want to see in their own feeds as well.
Spamming on Facebook isn't much of a solution if you get banned each time. Or?
Respect got nothing to do with it. People don't need to agree with me. But the problem is we aren't allowed to express our opinion in these socialist-globalist democratures/plutocracies/psychopath "elite" rule.
Wrong about what?
also nobody wants to argue with you
They don't want to argue because then they can be proven wrong and don't get things there way. They are anti-democratic and don't care. The "fascists." Just not nationalists, because idiots.
you are racists and nazis
Racist and racist. I don't really care whatever I'm racist or not. I care about being right. If I'm right but being right make you a racist then I'm a racist and the anti-racists are wrong. So be it. I'm no Nazi, or well, at-least not originally.. I don't like socialism and authoritarian rule. Then again considering the enemy and the lack of democracy and solutions we're not left with much of an alternative. But it's not really an ideological determination by then but rather self-defense and the better of two evils.
the minute you have enough crowd to disappear in you make your voice pretty clear
Where's that crowd really? And how is it made clear when it's always shut down? It's more of a myth than an actual thing..
communists kept me imprisoned in eastern europe - for many years - you know nothing about socialism or communism or marks or lenin or stalin or any of it
Good for you. What does it have to do with me?
there's opinions that make people welcome at parties and sought in conversation and there's opinions that make you repulsive. yours are the latter....
I don't care. The goal isn't to be the greatest ass-kisser. I don't know why you figured that. The goal is that I want to speak what's on my mind and reach out with it. I don't give a fuck what you and your stupid buddies think about it. Feel free to dislike it. That's not the problem.
I actually kinda want to have my passwords and a request to have all my accounts changed to my real name and all my posts turned to public as a testament.
Maybe there's some individual post for privacy reasons which shouldn't be so but.. Yeah. To spread the real thoughts and information rather than the false stuff society/rulers claim is the one which exist when they have tidied away all the stuff they didn't liked.
For instance you don't see people like me modding down the communists posts into non-existance whereas they do it.
They always blame the other / our side but it's themselves who are in power, themselves who remove freedom and democracy, themselves who want to destroy identity and nurture it at the same time (depending on whose identity it is of course, destroy all white/european people but keep racism for their own socialist agendas by grouping all other ethnicities together and measure their outcome and falsly claim they are discriminated against and need the stealing authoritorian socialists as their saviors.)
They are the true 100% never hesitating or appologizing fascists and racists. Except their non-free anti-individualistic society is constructed on their stupid idea just like with Islamism rather than on ethnicity. The threat and outcome is the same. Yet you're supposed to apploud it and be fine with it because it's their creation rather than someone else's.
Why would I use a throw-away account? I've got nothing to be ashamed of. I have four Facebook accounts of which three I remember but they are all in variations of my real name and are only there because like for instance two of them are banned (always for 30 days.) My good real / active twitter account is kinda gone. I registered a pair of others but haven't bothered with them because nowadays twitter is an echo-chamber of friends posts so you get no reach anyway. The account is closed for "suspecious activity" but I don't seem to be able to unlock it one way or the other (it may have been hacked inbetween, I don't care, it had awful security by design.)
For USA vs Russia maybe, as humans or from an ideological stand-point not at all.
Our Swedish government already pay interest groups to act on social media and in society and support media and try to shut down opinions they don't like and jail people of the wrong opinions and their private thought police make people lose their jobs and threaten people and so on.
So so fucking what that Russia try to spread their agenda too? Pretty sure Israel and USA is pretty good at it too.
Indeed. The alt-right ditto-heads are going to crowdsource these rankings into an echo-chamber in the first 10 minutes. I can't imagine why anyone thought this was a good idea.
Everyone else does it and we're even forced to it. We're not allowed in the other medias so.. what's the obvious and only solution?
It's so fucking sad, mental and hillariously non-hillariously destructive that the freedom-hating socialists get away with making claims like "we need to start treating each other with respect!" as an answer to arguments with a harsh tone (note: It's not a counter-argument) after having called us racists and nazis for decades. Yeah.. About that: No. They should be called socialist-bastards, freedom-haters, communists, all of it the whole time and in a negative fashion and easily fend of just because their anti-individual enforced collectivism ideas isn't acceptable whatsoever.
It's just another way of trying to shut people up. Like always. And then they will be like "our opinion is that of the majority, haven't you noticed? You don't see or hear any other now do you?!" - as if.
But I'd say that's already the case. Only it will become worse. But it's definitely not free and at equal means as is.
More limited and monoton? Yes.
Remove some illusionary freedom we already have? We don't have it as is (In Europe, in the US you don't necessary have it either but you're at-least better off.)
Nowhere since that would be illegal. Otherwise I may have had one on the hand or something, but more likely I would just wear it on clothes or as pin or use it on paper slips or put it up on places with a pen or what not.
... is that the Jew / NWO / Socialist federate plutocracy / technocracy / globalist / 1984 media isn't the one to be trusted.
Maybe they have created enough sheep to get away with it but if the people decided who knows maybe their brainwashing dumbfuck propaganda sites are the ones which would lose out for the real facts and opinions also from people who don't share their agenda, are loyal or live of their system.
I know putting Jew in there may have me modded down but/. seem to be infested by SJWs modding anything they don't like down now anyway so.. Anyway Jew is mostly there because they are usually included in the same gang. Call it what you want. I included a bunch of names/subjects.
With the addition of shit-people to Sweden the standard of living and what can be produced per capita of course fall and we end up in a worse society than we'd have otherwise.
For instance I assume the knowledge level and the freedom to be creative and put that to use into something useful and gain something from it to a very large extent decide what you get out and how much money that's worth. Now with IQ falling in our neightbor countries and it would make the most sense if it felt the most in Sweden and with a new wave of idiotic socialism spreading from the US were people demand equal pay for the idiotic life-decisions they want to make rather than earning what you're worth it would make sense for Sweden to become a more average shit-hole rather than the good nation it once was.
You can't expect shit like that and expect the same results.
Of course for those who come from other shit-countries maybe they can reach further here because we're less shit but that doesn't help the part where they are more shit than us.
This level of both technology and organization of it is beyond the capability of probably all Western nations now.
Here in Sweden we're 10+ million people now but more like 6 million actual Swedes and more like 8 million at our peak.
Anyway China got a population of 1379 million. Sure you'd have to share natural resources (but also the cost of infrastructure), but at say 1379/8 = 172 times as many at an area 21.45 times as large and with a population density of 8 times as many would what post-communist China do really had been impossible here?
Because I guess this was a comment about politics? Maybe it was economics. If so I guess a western world could also do it, though we don't really need to because we aren't polluting our own areas as much currently. London has already done it but with the technology of its time.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe oceans has been a petty stable environment before and their movement capability is severely limited ...
Yeah, and the oldest Mir-derived components of the station are now thirty three years old now.
Like what? Zarya was built in the 1990ies.
The crotch swipe-towel.
As a reason for why Sweden isn't number one or what?
Rent we even more poisoned? Though it may be an American trend at first. But we are always the leading progressives.
More freedom seem like a good thing. Then again maybe we are better.
My dad died in pneumonia after having being given Risperdal while he had Alzheimers, something the FDA recommends against doing considering exactly that. I don't know if the manufacturer say so themselves but supposedly it is the case.
Zen CCX = four cores.
Ryzen (4-8 cores) = Two CCX connected using infinity fabric on the same chip.
ThreadRipper (8-16 cores) and Epyc (? - 32 cores) = Four Ryzen chips also connected with infinity fabric on the same interposer.
Or something such.
Epyc & ThreadRipper: https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-co...
Ryzen 7 1st gen vs Intel i7 8th gen is something like 15% faster in multi-core vs 15% faster in gaming work-loads. About. There's variations like AVX (where Intel HEDT is faster still relative the i7) and games where the performance impact is closer to 40%. The Ryzen 7 chip and motherboard is cheaper. ThreadRipper socket is cool.
With Ryzen 2000-series for the "2600" engineering sample the clock was 200 MHz higher. Guess we'll see if it stop at that or not.
The AMD chips have a bit more PCI-express lanes and are less affected by this too.
So.. do as you want. For a specific use-case like a video program or sound-production which doesn't fully utilize additional cores and depend on more on per core performance or AVX maybe Intel is better. For multi-threaded ALU work and now maybe for virtualization and storage performance maybe AMD is better.
We'll all be winners if you buy AMD though. I guess.
As I understand it, Intel proposes to build in a switch in future CPU's which tells the CPU to stop being insecure. The switch is going to be off by default and must be switched on by the kernel during boot. Intel proposes to let all future CPU's be insecure by default.
Kinda weird considering how they also say fixing this won't make the chips perform much worse ;D
and how exactly does that do anything at all to improve the situation? or are you suggesting Open source hardware would somehow be magically design flaw free?
All non-capitalist designs are way better ;D
Will the Intel processors become even slower than what they are with current patches?
Beyond the stuff in the summary for a lossy format the quality is still shit relative the competition and it's lossy to begin with. Looks more like shit than necessary and totally suck for text. What's the fucking reason to not replace it for new content?
Next.
No. Snowflakes are your kind. Also the racist, the anti-democrats, the freedom haters, the socialists, the dictators, the assholes, the dehumanizers, the authoritorian assholes, ..
No I don't need a safe-space but I would like to have a space where I can tell you idiots how wrong and nasty you are.
I'm not free and I don't have any guns. I'm a Swede you see. I can't shoot stuff. Right now at-least. Of course you can get guns in Sweden too but the legal guns aren't all that great for taking down lots of people you don't like. There's of course a bunch of illegal guns in Sweden which work better for that purpose but those who have access to those are more likely the kind of people you associate with instead.
I grew up in a communist country and ran away - people with your mentality were our oppressors..
That make no sense.
media is plural already; what IS the obvious and only solution? spam on facebook?? nobody wants to treat you with respect - may be they start that way, but then you prove them wrong very fast
Social media is basically Facebook or Google. There's not really much alternatives to that. They own a bunch of other companies too and Twitter behaves just the same. Of course there _IS_ alternatives too but there you won't have any audience anyway. Also the governments control the media and support them and direct them anyway and alternatively the private companies running those media platforms have their own agendas and put even further limitations on... the lack of freedom of speech and take away even more of it. And of course beyond that you've got the moderators in whatever group on those pages or people who just sort what they want to see in their own feeds as well.
Spamming on Facebook isn't much of a solution if you get banned each time. Or?
Respect got nothing to do with it. People don't need to agree with me. But the problem is we aren't allowed to express our opinion in these socialist-globalist democratures/plutocracies/psychopath "elite" rule.
Wrong about what?
also nobody wants to argue with you
They don't want to argue because then they can be proven wrong and don't get things there way. They are anti-democratic and don't care. The "fascists." Just not nationalists, because idiots.
you are racists and nazis
Racist and racist. I don't really care whatever I'm racist or not. I care about being right. If I'm right but being right make you a racist then I'm a racist and the anti-racists are wrong. So be it. I'm no Nazi, or well, at-least not originally.. I don't like socialism and authoritarian rule. Then again considering the enemy and the lack of democracy and solutions we're not left with much of an alternative. But it's not really an ideological determination by then but rather self-defense and the better of two evils.
the minute you have enough crowd to disappear in you make your voice pretty clear
Where's that crowd really? And how is it made clear when it's always shut down? It's more of a myth than an actual thing ..
communists kept me imprisoned in eastern europe - for many years - you know nothing about socialism or communism or marks or lenin or stalin or any of it
Good for you. What does it have to do with me?
there's opinions that make people welcome at parties and sought in conversation and there's opinions that make you repulsive. yours are the latter....
I don't care. The goal isn't to be the greatest ass-kisser. I don't know why you figured that. The goal is that I want to speak what's on my mind and reach out with it. I don't give a fuck what you and your stupid buddies think about it. Feel free to dislike it. That's not the problem.
I actually kinda want to have my passwords and a request to have all my accounts changed to my real name and all my posts turned to public as a testament.
Maybe there's some individual post for privacy reasons which shouldn't be so but .. Yeah. To spread the real thoughts and information rather than the false stuff society/rulers claim is the one which exist when they have tidied away all the stuff they didn't liked.
Thanks.
I'm always right though.
For instance you don't see people like me modding down the communists posts into non-existance whereas they do it.
They always blame the other / our side but it's themselves who are in power, themselves who remove freedom and democracy, themselves who want to destroy identity and nurture it at the same time (depending on whose identity it is of course, destroy all white/european people but keep racism for their own socialist agendas by grouping all other ethnicities together and measure their outcome and falsly claim they are discriminated against and need the stealing authoritorian socialists as their saviors.)
They are the true 100% never hesitating or appologizing fascists and racists. Except their non-free anti-individualistic society is constructed on their stupid idea just like with Islamism rather than on ethnicity. The threat and outcome is the same. Yet you're supposed to apploud it and be fine with it because it's their creation rather than someone else's.
Why would I use a throw-away account? I've got nothing to be ashamed of. I have four Facebook accounts of which three I remember but they are all in variations of my real name and are only there because like for instance two of them are banned (always for 30 days.) My good real / active twitter account is kinda gone. I registered a pair of others but haven't bothered with them because nowadays twitter is an echo-chamber of friends posts so you get no reach anyway. The account is closed for "suspecious activity" but I don't seem to be able to unlock it one way or the other (it may have been hacked inbetween, I don't care, it had awful security by design.)
...or the Russian trolls being paid to do so.
Why does it matter where they are from?
For USA vs Russia maybe, as humans or from an ideological stand-point not at all.
Our Swedish government already pay interest groups to act on social media and in society and support media and try to shut down opinions they don't like and jail people of the wrong opinions and their private thought police make people lose their jobs and threaten people and so on.
So so fucking what that Russia try to spread their agenda too? Pretty sure Israel and USA is pretty good at it too.
Possibly not the best music ever made:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Somewhat better I guess:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Why would that ever happen?
Especially considering what agenda those in charge want to push.
But ANY such scenario is scary. Not just the ones the globalists & socialists doesn't like.
Indeed. The alt-right ditto-heads are going to crowdsource these rankings into an echo-chamber in the first 10 minutes. I can't imagine why anyone thought this was a good idea.
Everyone else does it and we're even forced to it. We're not allowed in the other medias so .. what's the obvious and only solution?
It's so fucking sad, mental and hillariously non-hillariously destructive that the freedom-hating socialists get away with making claims like "we need to start treating each other with respect!" as an answer to arguments with a harsh tone (note: It's not a counter-argument) after having called us racists and nazis for decades. Yeah.. About that: No. They should be called socialist-bastards, freedom-haters, communists, all of it the whole time and in a negative fashion and easily fend of just because their anti-individual enforced collectivism ideas isn't acceptable whatsoever.
It's just another way of trying to shut people up. Like always. And then they will be like "our opinion is that of the majority, haven't you noticed? You don't see or hear any other now do you?!" - as if.
This is what they want.
But I'd say that's already the case. Only it will become worse. But it's definitely not free and at equal means as is.
More limited and monoton? Yes.
Remove some illusionary freedom we already have? We don't have it as is (In Europe, in the US you don't necessary have it either but you're at-least better off.)
But they don't want people to be skeptical.
They want to encourage group-think and follow the stream. Obviously it should be THEIR stream but ..
The sad part is that they call it democracy and working against fake news and made up stories and lies.
Where do you have your swastika tattoo?
Nowhere since that would be illegal. Otherwise I may have had one on the hand or something, but more likely I would just wear it on clothes or as pin or use it on paper slips or put it up on places with a pen or what not.
... is that the Jew / NWO / Socialist federate plutocracy / technocracy / globalist / 1984 media isn't the one to be trusted.
Maybe they have created enough sheep to get away with it but if the people decided who knows maybe their brainwashing dumbfuck propaganda sites are the ones which would lose out for the real facts and opinions also from people who don't share their agenda, are loyal or live of their system.
I know putting Jew in there may have me modded down but /. seem to be infested by SJWs modding anything they don't like down now anyway so.. Anyway Jew is mostly there because they are usually included in the same gang. Call it what you want. I included a bunch of names/subjects.
... as for China it's not trying to be a melting pot of trash destroying all peoples and cultures.
It's China. They want to be China. They don't even like those who don't act Chinese who has been there for generations.
China doesn't have the same issues as Sweden do.
It's not unecessary.
With the addition of shit-people to Sweden the standard of living and what can be produced per capita of course fall and we end up in a worse society than we'd have otherwise.
For instance I assume the knowledge level and the freedom to be creative and put that to use into something useful and gain something from it to a very large extent decide what you get out and how much money that's worth. Now with IQ falling in our neightbor countries and it would make the most sense if it felt the most in Sweden and with a new wave of idiotic socialism spreading from the US were people demand equal pay for the idiotic life-decisions they want to make rather than earning what you're worth it would make sense for Sweden to become a more average shit-hole rather than the good nation it once was.
You can't expect shit like that and expect the same results.
Of course for those who come from other shit-countries maybe they can reach further here because we're less shit but that doesn't help the part where they are more shit than us.
This level of both technology and organization of it is beyond the capability of probably all Western nations now.
Here in Sweden we're 10+ million people now but more like 6 million actual Swedes and more like 8 million at our peak.
Anyway China got a population of 1379 million. Sure you'd have to share natural resources (but also the cost of infrastructure), but at say 1379/8 = 172 times as many at an area 21.45 times as large and with a population density of 8 times as many would what post-communist China do really had been impossible here?
Because I guess this was a comment about politics? Maybe it was economics. If so I guess a western world could also do it, though we don't really need to because we aren't polluting our own areas as much currently. London has already done it but with the technology of its time.