No, the most important is to not eat more than you burn.
This can be done by exercising at about three quarters of your maximum for 20 minutes every few days.
Sounds like some "fat burn zone" / cardio increasing pulse. Which is more bullshit. doing some low intensity work will burn a higher percentage of fat while doing so, but your body will burn less fat the rest of the day and thereby compensating for it. Doing high intensity training in intervals are most efficient for increasing your cardio.
Most of the calories you burn through exercise are usually burned while you aren't exercising because of raised BMR.
This is bullshit to, cardio and weight training don't make you use much more energy at rest, the most difference is while you're doing the activity. Weight training increase it more, but it's only by a few kcals, not a big deal.
Hypertrophic (muscle building exercise) isn't as efficient at raising your BMR
Wrong, but you already know that.
The first is raising lean body mass which means to use more energy moving
On an energy deficiency you're very unlikely to build more muscle even if you do weight lifting.
oxygenating your tissue et cetera
Means what?
The second is the relatively large amount of energy it takes to metabolise dietary protein into muscle tissue. IIRC a gram of muscle takes more energy to make than a gram of fat, and that's even discounting the protein required.
1 gram of carbohydrates or protein contains around 4 kcal of energy, alcohol 7 and fat 9.
It's true that body thermogenesis raises a little more from eating protein, I don't remember how much but maybe 15% or so of the energy is wasted this way. (The energy from the protein, not from all food.)
Spending equal time on each (up to the point of diminishing returns for hypertrophic exercise) will lower your weight faster than spending all of the time on aerobic. Additionally, if aesthetics are an issue you may wish to replace the decreasing fat with something else so you don't end up a thin but saggy skin bag.
If doesn't matter what you do, what matters is how much you eat. Workout for 12 hours per day and eat a lot of food and you can still remain huge, sit in the couch and eat very little food and you will get smaller.
I'd recommend biking or similar for cardio. Plus pilates for all-over tone, strength and posture. Plus free weights for increasing muscle mass. If you had to pick one I'd say pilates as it gives both aerobic and hypertrophic in roughly equal amounts, and a decent video will show how to vary the exercises to make them more or less strenuous.
I'd say do what you think is fun if all you want to do is burn energy, bike trips, walks, running, inlines, skiing, golf, badminton, volleyball, doesn't matter. If you don't care about being able to run for 5 miles without starting to walk or such you don't need to do shit. Intensive training will be best for increasing cardio, so running at high intensity in intervals, or doing the same thing with weights, or swimming as fast and hard as you can for a while, rest and then go at it again, or whatever you want will work best.
Pilates? Isn't that for girls? Decent as core training.
Free weights won't increase your muscle mass on an energy deficiency, use them to KEEP muscle while losing fat or to get MORE muscle without getting AS MUCH fat when eating on a surplus.
I'd choose weight training as the single one, because it's the only one which will build your body as good as it can. It may not get you super cardio but decent enough if you keep your rest times short.
But how much energy you burn doesn't matter. The only thing which matters are how much you burn vs how much you eat.
1480-223 = 1257.
If we had the same body and I'd go with weight lifting for a 500 deficiency and you wen't with cardio and ate 1257 kcals more than me per day my body would still look better in the end.
Of course cardio use more energy than not doing cardio, but that doesn't matter since you can just as well eat less and for most of us eating less is a smaller sacrifice than having to do lots of cardio.
Cardio does not increase your fat metabolism (in percent so to speak.)
And you need to do weight lifting to keep your muscles.
So if your body use 2500 kcals per day and you choose to do what you do and only eat 2000 for a 500 kcal deficiency or if you choose to do 1000 kcal of cardio and eat 3000 kcal for a 500 kcal deficiency won't matter.
But if you don't do weight lifting you'll probably end up with less muscle then you are done, which isn't good for your metabolism or looks.
Also people don't get more muscle mass while on an energy deficiency, beginners maybe, or very lucky people, but not regular people who have been working out for some time.
To tone doesn't matter, but the amount of work they push themself thru at the gym. Also the smaller guy probably try to increase his body mass so that's why he eats so much.
Afaik growth hormone don't build much muscle does it? But yes, to look like a pro bodybuilder you need to start injecting.
But most people would probably be happy with less than that, and you can look in good shape without it. It just takes time, heavy work at the gym and a good diet (both for increasing mass and getting rid of excess fat), which is probably the reason why people don't do it;)
You don't NEED to do cardio, you should do weight lifting to keep the muscles you have though, and cardio are still good for you. All you need is a energy deficiency.
(And the slower you lose weight and the more you workout the higher chance you'll keep muscle and that the body weight loss will be fat.)
I have no idea what the numbers come from, but no matter what no ones body unless you have some serious disease would waste the food, the "boho my body picks up everything I eat, my friend can eat pizzas and still remain thin."
No shit fatso! He only eats one pizza per day and nothing else, not 10 or fill it up with a lot of other stuff.
An olympic lifter at the gym weights in at 160 kg and complain how his body picks everything up, and then he goes to the store buying 1 kg of winegums and 2 litre of ice cream for "dessert" after his meal (he buy 1 kg because it's like 1 sek less / kg than if he had bought the 500 gram bags.)
It's true that one will look for a fast solution if one are very hungry, but if one aren't it doesn't matter so much if you eat 2 or 3 meals per day or 6-8..
Doesn't matter if he eats nuts aslong as his daily calorie intake remains the same, probably better for his form than fruit.
Why should he eat only vegetables and protein on workout days and lots of carbs on rest days? Would be nice to see the source for that advice... If everything the muscles can pick up food without insuline after working out and you refill your glucogen storages better at this time to, so why shouldn't he eat lots of carbohydrates on workout days? Also what's this stupid "no fat" advice? Time and time again it's been proven that a higher fat energy percent improves your body composition, not the opposite.
Let him eat whatever breakfast he prefer, porridge or cooked food would be fine to, personally I most often eat bread and tea because I like it..
Why should he eat apples but not banans and melons? Almost all fruit have lots carbohydrates in the form of sugars in them, apples does to, so what? Melons are LOW in total energy content and have much nutrition in them. http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/1954/2 The sugar vs should still eat them is an advice for all kinds of fruits.
Red meat and especially processed things like sausage and such isn't that good no chicken and fish are better. Personally I'm vegan so neither of them for me of course.
But of course they won't produce lots of energy for no reason. Anyway muscle do use more energy at rest than fat mass, even if it's in the tens of kilocalories/day and kg muscle.
Yeah, better catch private persons downloading music they wouldn't had bought anyway for their own usage than catching people making a living of stolen "information."
I doubt it since the products aren't THAT great, but the WWDCs and such have been very great and inspiring, atleast until 2006 and 2007 because those about Leopard was just lame. And also maybe he was sick and tired even then.
Not to forget people are more likely to want to see a great movie in the cinema, especially if the picture and sound is great aswell I guess.
Just compare the IMDB score of a movie which have sold like crap and which most people saw later as a pirated copy... Or how much people enjoy watching crap at the cinema.
Yeah, you are probably correct, I've read so many comments from people saying the movie is great, and it got #1 on imdb immediatly, so my first reaction was that they got the money because the movie was GREAT aswell (I haven't seen it..)
Sucks if they will use that as an excuse to blame piracy:(
And how will they explain if it goes well week two aswell? Even if there are pirated copies out in the wild?
But when have you AGREED to the GPL? When did I signed a contract for it? It doesn't matter if it's distributing or using, the point of saying EULAs doesn't matter is because you've already bought the product and have it and it's yours? Same with the GPL software.
... though one could argue they'd sell many more copies if they sold it to everyone.
On the other hand costumers may demand that it actually RUN and works on their machines, which would be more work for Apple. Now they don't have to care, it happen to run on your PC? Good for you, but if they sold it and it didn't run they'd have a problem.
That solds copies of the OS may not be enough to cover development costs (and generate revenue), and that they would probably have to raise the cost of OS X if people didn't bough macs / it wasn't included with macs / people ran it on other machines.
Considered the amount of complaints on it it seem to actually be your problems..
I don't understand why it would be so hard to accept that people decide what the fuck they want to do with their product, if this is how Apple want to sell it let them. If you don't like it don't buy it.
Sure they could ask for more money for the OS and less for the computers, and then they would probably sell less machines and people would be less willingly to upgrade between releases. You may have liked it better that way, they obviously don't, and it's their product so who are you to decide what they should do with it?
The later part is just a play with words an you know what they mean. Also I don't know if trademark laws would let you call your machine for an Apple one even if you have their sticker on it... It's like Toyotas advertisments over here where everyone steal their car uhm, logo thingys and put on their own cars before getting them thru automobile survey.
But: 1) You should only buy macs just when they are updated. 2) But the Toshiba can't run OS X (legally/reliably/supposedly/whatever), on the MBP you pay for the software and that ability. 3) A 17" laptop is fucking huge.
Slashdot Mirror
The bad part of eating crap isn't as much how it effects your body composition as if is that it's crap and don't have any nutritional value.
The most important thing is to increase BMR.
No, the most important is to not eat more than you burn.
This can be done by exercising at about three quarters of your maximum for 20 minutes every few days.
Sounds like some "fat burn zone" / cardio increasing pulse. Which is more bullshit. doing some low intensity work will burn a higher percentage of fat while doing so, but your body will burn less fat the rest of the day and thereby compensating for it.
Doing high intensity training in intervals are most efficient for increasing your cardio.
Most of the calories you burn through exercise are usually burned while you aren't exercising because of raised BMR.
This is bullshit to, cardio and weight training don't make you use much more energy at rest, the most difference is while you're doing the activity. Weight training increase it more, but it's only by a few kcals, not a big deal.
Hypertrophic (muscle building exercise) isn't as efficient at raising your BMR
Wrong, but you already know that.
The first is raising lean body mass which means to use more energy moving
On an energy deficiency you're very unlikely to build more muscle even if you do weight lifting.
oxygenating your tissue et cetera
Means what?
The second is the relatively large amount of energy it takes to metabolise dietary protein into muscle tissue. IIRC a gram of muscle takes more energy to make than a gram of fat, and that's even discounting the protein required.
1 gram of carbohydrates or protein contains around 4 kcal of energy, alcohol 7 and fat 9.
It's true that body thermogenesis raises a little more from eating protein, I don't remember how much but maybe 15% or so of the energy is wasted this way. (The energy from the protein, not from all food.)
Spending equal time on each (up to the point of diminishing returns for hypertrophic exercise) will lower your weight faster than spending all of the time on aerobic. Additionally, if aesthetics are an issue you may wish to replace the decreasing fat with something else so you don't end up a thin but saggy skin bag.
If doesn't matter what you do, what matters is how much you eat. Workout for 12 hours per day and eat a lot of food and you can still remain huge, sit in the couch and eat very little food and you will get smaller.
I'd recommend biking or similar for cardio. Plus pilates for all-over tone, strength and posture. Plus free weights for increasing muscle mass.
If you had to pick one I'd say pilates as it gives both aerobic and hypertrophic in roughly equal amounts, and a decent video will show how to vary the exercises to make them more or less strenuous.
I'd say do what you think is fun if all you want to do is burn energy, bike trips, walks, running, inlines, skiing, golf, badminton, volleyball, doesn't matter. If you don't care about being able to run for 5 miles without starting to walk or such you don't need to do shit.
Intensive training will be best for increasing cardio, so running at high intensity in intervals, or doing the same thing with weights, or swimming as fast and hard as you can for a while, rest and then go at it again, or whatever you want will work best.
Pilates? Isn't that for girls? Decent as core training.
Free weights won't increase your muscle mass on an energy deficiency, use them to KEEP muscle while losing fat or to get MORE muscle without getting AS MUCH fat when eating on a surplus.
I'd choose weight training as the single one, because it's the only one which will build your body as good as it can. It may not get you super cardio but decent enough if you keep your rest times short.
But how much energy you burn doesn't matter. The only thing which matters are how much you burn vs how much you eat.
1480-223 = 1257.
If we had the same body and I'd go with weight lifting for a 500 deficiency and you wen't with cardio and ate 1257 kcals more than me per day my body would still look better in the end.
Of course cardio use more energy than not doing cardio, but that doesn't matter since you can just as well eat less and for most of us eating less is a smaller sacrifice than having to do lots of cardio.
Cardio does not increase your fat metabolism (in percent so to speak.)
And you need to do weight lifting to keep your muscles.
So if your body use 2500 kcals per day and you choose to do what you do and only eat 2000 for a 500 kcal deficiency or if you choose to do 1000 kcal of cardio and eat 3000 kcal for a 500 kcal deficiency won't matter.
But if you don't do weight lifting you'll probably end up with less muscle then you are done, which isn't good for your metabolism or looks.
Also people don't get more muscle mass while on an energy deficiency, beginners maybe, or very lucky people, but not regular people who have been working out for some time.
To tone doesn't matter, but the amount of work they push themself thru at the gym. Also the smaller guy probably try to increase his body mass so that's why he eats so much.
Doesn't fat weight take something like 4 kcal / day and kilo at rest? Yeah, big deal ..
Of course a 380 lbs blob will use quite some amounts of energy if he starts moving.
Afaik growth hormone don't build much muscle does it? But yes, to look like a pro bodybuilder you need to start injecting.
But most people would probably be happy with less than that, and you can look in good shape without it. It just takes time, heavy work at the gym and a good diet (both for increasing mass and getting rid of excess fat), which is probably the reason why people don't do it ;)
You don't NEED to do cardio, you should do weight lifting to keep the muscles you have though, and cardio are still good for you. All you need is a energy deficiency.
(And the slower you lose weight and the more you workout the higher chance you'll keep muscle and that the body weight loss will be fat.)
I have no idea what the numbers come from, but no matter what no ones body unless you have some serious disease would waste the food, the "boho my body picks up everything I eat, my friend can eat pizzas and still remain thin."
No shit fatso! He only eats one pizza per day and nothing else, not 10 or fill it up with a lot of other stuff.
An olympic lifter at the gym weights in at 160 kg and complain how his body picks everything up, and then he goes to the store buying 1 kg of winegums and 2 litre of ice cream for "dessert" after his meal (he buy 1 kg because it's like 1 sek less / kg than if he had bought the 500 gram bags.)
Boohoo, poor him.
It's true that one will look for a fast solution if one are very hungry, but if one aren't it doesn't matter so much if you eat 2 or 3 meals per day or 6-8 ..
Doesn't matter if he eats nuts aslong as his daily calorie intake remains the same, probably better for his form than fruit.
Of course he can't eat kilos of nuts per day.
Where to start?
Why should he eat only vegetables and protein on workout days and lots of carbs on rest days? Would be nice to see the source for that advice ... If everything the muscles can pick up food without insuline after working out and you refill your glucogen storages better at this time to, so why shouldn't he eat lots of carbohydrates on workout days? Also what's this stupid "no fat" advice?
Time and time again it's been proven that a higher fat energy percent improves your body composition, not the opposite.
Let him eat whatever breakfast he prefer, porridge or cooked food would be fine to, personally I most often eat bread and tea because I like it ..
Why should he eat apples but not banans and melons? Almost all fruit have lots carbohydrates in the form of sugars in them, apples does to, so what? Melons are LOW in total energy content and have much nutrition in them.
http://www.nutritiondata.com/facts/fruits-and-fruit-juices/1954/2
The sugar vs should still eat them is an advice for all kinds of fruits.
Red meat and especially processed things like sausage and such isn't that good no chicken and fish are better. Personally I'm vegan so neither of them for me of course.
But of course they won't produce lots of energy for no reason. Anyway muscle do use more energy at rest than fat mass, even if it's in the tens of kilocalories/day and kg muscle.
Yeah, better catch private persons downloading music they wouldn't had bought anyway for their own usage than catching people making a living of stolen "information."
I doubt it since the products aren't THAT great, but the WWDCs and such have been very great and inspiring, atleast until 2006 and 2007 because those about Leopard was just lame. And also maybe he was sick and tired even then.
It's delivered in digital form and not on film? And the resolution is just 1080p?
Not to forget people are more likely to want to see a great movie in the cinema, especially if the picture and sound is great aswell I guess.
Just compare the IMDB score of a movie which have sold like crap and which most people saw later as a pirated copy ... Or how much people enjoy watching crap at the cinema.
Yeah, you are probably correct, I've read so many comments from people saying the movie is great, and it got #1 on imdb immediatly, so my first reaction was that they got the money because the movie was GREAT aswell (I haven't seen it..)
Sucks if they will use that as an excuse to blame piracy :(
And how will they explain if it goes well week two aswell? Even if there are pirated copies out in the wild?
So, people who believe in the statistic certainly of life on other planets
What? ..
But when have you AGREED to the GPL? When did I signed a contract for it? It doesn't matter if it's distributing or using, the point of saying EULAs doesn't matter is because you've already bought the product and have it and it's yours? Same with the GPL software.
Yeah, I pointed out the same thing in another post of mine suggesting one could do whatever with free software once one had the code then ..
... though one could argue they'd sell many more copies if they sold it to everyone.
On the other hand costumers may demand that it actually RUN and works on their machines, which would be more work for Apple. Now they don't have to care, it happen to run on your PC? Good for you, but if they sold it and it didn't run they'd have a problem.
That solds copies of the OS may not be enough to cover development costs (and generate revenue), and that they would probably have to raise the cost of OS X if people didn't bough macs / it wasn't included with macs / people ran it on other machines.
Fair.
Considered the amount of complaints on it it seem to actually be your problems ..
I don't understand why it would be so hard to accept that people decide what the fuck they want to do with their product, if this is how Apple want to sell it let them. If you don't like it don't buy it.
Sure they could ask for more money for the OS and less for the computers, and then they would probably sell less machines and people would be less willingly to upgrade between releases. You may have liked it better that way, they obviously don't, and it's their product so who are you to decide what they should do with it?
The later part is just a play with words an you know what they mean. Also I don't know if trademark laws would let you call your machine for an Apple one even if you have their sticker on it... It's like Toyotas advertisments over here where everyone steal their car uhm, logo thingys and put on their own cars before getting them thru automobile survey.
But:
1) You should only buy macs just when they are updated.
2) But the Toshiba can't run OS X (legally/reliably/supposedly/whatever), on the MBP you pay for the software and that ability.
3) A 17" laptop is fucking huge.