I was thinking it but not at the computer at that time: Also Saudi-Arabia. Who definitely seem to have their way in things (feel free to add Israel, Iran, Turkey and Qatar here too.) Saudi-Arabia is rich, half the size of the EU by itself and culturally more equally shitty. So that seem to be a great place for them to live in.
But yeah, the responsibility for the ass-hole leaders of a country isn't towards the citizens of the rest of the world (though it would be nice if they wasn't fucking their life up too) but rather to their own citizens. As such it's kinda ok if USA behaves like shit and ruin life for others as long as it benefit their own citizens. Sure other people can become angry at them and want their leaders to act against the USA for that and it would be their responsibility to try to deal with the situation. But of course it's not in the interest of the citizens to have their country ruined.
And the same goes for everyone else. Globalism and socialism is cancer.
Supported by Europe? I definitely doesn't want Sweden in NATO so that excuse could ever be used, though even if Sweden have actually had anything to do with it whatsoever it's us the Swedes who should decide what should happen to the country and as such they shouldn't be welcomed anyway and everything should be done to keep them away. However since it's mostly the super power politics of the USA which cause it send them there instead and let Europe be. If France and GB has done their share let them sink under it too but let us be.
If you happen to talk about stuff like pushing for more freedom for the citizens of whatever country and if you see that as a cause for fleeing said country then I don't really know what to say.
Also our traitor politicians doesn't really have much to do with the people they control. It should be the other way around but it's not.
PenTile is used because it's cheaper (and cheating.) Originally because blue wasn't as important for luminance. Since pixel only mean picture element and may not really be specified further in what it actually definie and since supposedly Samsung went with some VESA standard based on contrast they get away with it. But assuming each RG or BG counts as one pixel otherwise on a screen of just red or blue colour the number of pixels would drop to half.
You mean 5 11/16 inches? You wrote it in a weird way. Since the rest of us have shortcuts to split or group in thousands and for more common measurements also hundreds and tenths we usually don't do fractions with measurements using other divisors than exponents of 10.
Anyway the value could easily be expressed as 144 mm.
So, the reason this country I'm living in (Sweden) and so many others signed it is because we'll get paid?
That's highly unlikely. The most likely scenario if anything is that we'll be among the ones who pay others the most to help them do it too, while also doing it ourselves.
I guess there's some way to see how much money Sweden vs USA grant shit-hole countries in support.
Thankfully they don't have much money period so they don't drive around as much and don't buy as much items so..
I didn't blamed the US. I blamed Trump on this one. Since he's chosen to be a denier of man made climate change, don't know whatever he believe the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere are man-made or not either.
Just like our Swedish government, the EU parliament or Juncker represent me, the Swedes or the Europeans I won't say Trumps idea about this is that of all of the Americans or even the majority of them. I know a guy who live here who also don't believe in it but he's stupid in general and for instance don't believe that Nazi-Germans gased Jews either.
A bunch of people are stupid. I don't think Trump are stupid though. I just think he's being dishonest because of either direct gains for himself by supporting those who have an economic gains from continued usage of fossil fuels or at-least because of that's where some of the voters and support for the republicans are. Maybe a priority of American economy / growth now vs world cost / impact later. The impact are global after all while the gains are national or even private.
I don't think politicians will make the greatest choices and solutions but on the other hand as the situation is at the moment you can't expect the market to fix stuff like pollution, natural resource usage or destruction of the environment and climate simply because a price haven't been put on those things. I assume it's economically stupid to destroy the climate but as long as destroying it doesn't have a cost for doing so and others / something else will have to go in and pay for fixing it / pay the consequences the system won't solve it by itself. The problem is the lack of fee on releasing fossil CO2 into the atmosphere for instance. Similarly AFAIK the fee for mining minerals here in Sweden is 0.1% of the value of them which is pretty low and hence you don't really need to be able to gain much from doing so for actually wanting to do so. If all such property was privately owned maybe one would ask for more in return and hence it wouldn't happen but I also don't expect private ownership of something like a stone quarry to really protect the stone because while the damage will last for thousands - many millions of years the person living there may not plan in those time scales and not really care because that person will be dead since very long then. Anyway with a high enough fee on CO2 release it would no longer be interesting to release it and the market would find some other solution. The problem is that it's free to destroy it. I've read about gold mining in the jungle in south America too where those doing so may use mercury to gather the gold because that's cheap for them and work but if you really try to clean up mercury you spend more money than what the gold will be worth anyway. The problem there is that that person will never have to pay for cleaning it up. It's free to pour it out into the environment. So the price on the market is wrong and hence the market doesn't fix the problem by itself. In a world where everything was privately owned if you could sue / demand money from the person who released CO2 and actually be compensated then the system might had worked. As that's not the case there just need to be a high enough price on releasing it so that it's not done, or at-least as high / higher than the cost would be of capturing it and storing it away one way or the other again. But the market likely would have better solutions than random politician had the price actually been correct.
Slashdot Mirror
It's fine for mid range but it's the low end card. With a 2050/2050Ti being way worse if it happens.
And the solution is: Final!
Saving the environment.
1000 of ship-miles and lots of construction per year.
I'm just joking and maybe in the end it can be beneficial / advantages outweight disadvantages but so far ..
I saw a Twitter tweet about how Neil A. backwards was alien. How about that?!
It's like 15 years maybe older site about OS and technology development.
But you've actually have to care and have an interest of such thing to have visited them.
I don't see how it's very relevant you don't care or know about them because clearly you're not one of us.
LOL at Russia taking the lead.
How much lead have you taken?
Will UAE on MacOS in ShapeShifter be the fastest Amiga?
He supports animal abuse.
I was thinking it but not at the computer at that time:
Also Saudi-Arabia. Who definitely seem to have their way in things (feel free to add Israel, Iran, Turkey and Qatar here too.)
Saudi-Arabia is rich, half the size of the EU by itself and culturally more equally shitty. So that seem to be a great place for them to live in.
But yeah, the responsibility for the ass-hole leaders of a country isn't towards the citizens of the rest of the world (though it would be nice if they wasn't fucking their life up too) but rather to their own citizens. As such it's kinda ok if USA behaves like shit and ruin life for others as long as it benefit their own citizens. Sure other people can become angry at them and want their leaders to act against the USA for that and it would be their responsibility to try to deal with the situation. But of course it's not in the interest of the citizens to have their country ruined.
And the same goes for everyone else. Globalism and socialism is cancer.
Supported by Europe?
I definitely doesn't want Sweden in NATO so that excuse could ever be used, though even if Sweden have actually had anything to do with it whatsoever it's us the Swedes who should decide what should happen to the country and as such they shouldn't be welcomed anyway and everything should be done to keep them away. However since it's mostly the super power politics of the USA which cause it send them there instead and let Europe be. If France and GB has done their share let them sink under it too but let us be.
If you happen to talk about stuff like pushing for more freedom for the citizens of whatever country and if you see that as a cause for fleeing said country then I don't really know what to say.
Also our traitor politicians doesn't really have much to do with the people they control. It should be the other way around but it's not.
That's also bad.
But what about all the filth floating over to Europe?
It's a big deal because it's stupid and dictatorship.
I understand you don't get it though because you agree with both.
An obscure package like is among 30 000 is why there's not 50% women on IT!
Let alone 100% transexuals who don't accept their sex organ as theirs.
Can't use something silly enough to do such stupid shit.
It's weird how a tiny vocal minority can get through stupid shit like this.
... remove hazardous components from the air?
Then again if you do have a collection of hazardous things with some CO2 in it possibly also N2? a plant could remove that.
Except Chrome is one of Google's data miners.
Then again what's the problem with optimizing performance for YouTube videos consider what a large part of the Internet they are?
Except then IE6 was the big fish and they could enforce it and now it's Google and they do it.
Why you blame Microsoft in both cases / not Google now... Well I guess that's just intellectual dishonesty.
"Adequately sharp and sized display"
There exist AMOLED with RGB subpixel layout too.
PenTile is used because it's cheaper (and cheating.) Originally because blue wasn't as important for luminance. Since pixel only mean picture element and may not really be specified further in what it actually definie and since supposedly Samsung went with some VESA standard based on contrast they get away with it.
But assuming each RG or BG counts as one pixel otherwise on a screen of just red or blue colour the number of pixels would drop to half.
My besel doesn't have round corners or a notch you insensitive clod!
You mean 5 11/16 inches?
You wrote it in a weird way.
Since the rest of us have shortcuts to split or group in thousands and for more common measurements also hundreds and tenths we usually don't do fractions with measurements using other divisors than exponents of 10.
Anyway the value could easily be expressed as 144 mm.
But there will be plenty of SJWs we can recycle for energy.
So, the reason this country I'm living in (Sweden) and so many others signed it is because we'll get paid?
That's highly unlikely. The most likely scenario if anything is that we'll be among the ones who pay others the most to help them do it too, while also doing it ourselves.
I guess there's some way to see how much money Sweden vs USA grant shit-hole countries in support.
Thankfully they don't have much money period so they don't drive around as much and don't buy as much items so ..
I didn't blamed the US. I blamed Trump on this one. Since he's chosen to be a denier of man made climate change, don't know whatever he believe the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere are man-made or not either.
Just like our Swedish government, the EU parliament or Juncker represent me, the Swedes or the Europeans I won't say Trumps idea about this is that of all of the Americans or even the majority of them. I know a guy who live here who also don't believe in it but he's stupid in general and for instance don't believe that Nazi-Germans gased Jews either.
A bunch of people are stupid. I don't think Trump are stupid though. I just think he's being dishonest because of either direct gains for himself by supporting those who have an economic gains from continued usage of fossil fuels or at-least because of that's where some of the voters and support for the republicans are. Maybe a priority of American economy / growth now vs world cost / impact later. The impact are global after all while the gains are national or even private.
I don't think politicians will make the greatest choices and solutions but on the other hand as the situation is at the moment you can't expect the market to fix stuff like pollution, natural resource usage or destruction of the environment and climate simply because a price haven't been put on those things. I assume it's economically stupid to destroy the climate but as long as destroying it doesn't have a cost for doing so and others / something else will have to go in and pay for fixing it / pay the consequences the system won't solve it by itself. The problem is the lack of fee on releasing fossil CO2 into the atmosphere for instance. Similarly AFAIK the fee for mining minerals here in Sweden is 0.1% of the value of them which is pretty low and hence you don't really need to be able to gain much from doing so for actually wanting to do so. If all such property was privately owned maybe one would ask for more in return and hence it wouldn't happen but I also don't expect private ownership of something like a stone quarry to really protect the stone because while the damage will last for thousands - many millions of years the person living there may not plan in those time scales and not really care because that person will be dead since very long then. Anyway with a high enough fee on CO2 release it would no longer be interesting to release it and the market would find some other solution. The problem is that it's free to destroy it. I've read about gold mining in the jungle in south America too where those doing so may use mercury to gather the gold because that's cheap for them and work but if you really try to clean up mercury you spend more money than what the gold will be worth anyway. The problem there is that that person will never have to pay for cleaning it up. It's free to pour it out into the environment. So the price on the market is wrong and hence the market doesn't fix the problem by itself. In a world where everything was privately owned if you could sue / demand money from the person who released CO2 and actually be compensated then the system might had worked. As that's not the case there just need to be a high enough price on releasing it so that it's not done, or at-least as high / higher than the cost would be of capturing it and storing it away one way or the other again. But the market likely would have better solutions than random politician had the price actually been correct.