At least separate DCs, not necessarily air gaps and then use a less sloppy protocol than SMB to exchange needed information between servers, possibly using gateways that sanitizes any data exchanged.
The problem with many of the Microsoft protocols is that they are a "catch-all" for any operation the user or application may perform.
An AI is only as good as the people that have taught it. Of course it can accumulate experience and never forget, but humans also have a thing called intuition to see things in a different view and capture things that are completely new.
Humans and AI will however supplement each other for improved accuracy.
Almost all my transactions today are with cards, not cash. It can go one or two weeks between each cash transaction I make and then it's for something insignificant.
It's rare to find anything around here that don't take plastic cards.
So not carrying cash, at least in any significant amounts, is more because it's not really useful not because it's dangerous.
The problem is with new episodes and with shows that are less common. Imagine someone playing a fresh Aussie show in the US with a lot of violence on a streaming service.
You can't catch them all. Unless you integrate the monitoring device with the audio system so it can automatically filter out all that sound.
My concern over the technology is that it also can cause a non-deterministic behavior for the platform making it hard to capture elusive bugs. This means that you would need to have a way to be able to load a kernel that's mapped identically to the last time when you perform your test and development.
Bugs that only appears when you have a certain constellation and load order are sometimes wasting weeks of work.
It's also hard to compare different types of waste, and that includes how easy it's to recycle the stuff - and how much any non-recycleable parts of it has to be contained when deposited.
I know it was geostationary, but it's still not a very good idea regardless of which system you use. The Iridium system is alive because if covers corner cases, but satellite broadband is basically the same - good for corner cases. All the rest are better off with optical fibers. It was the spread of broadband like DSL and fibers that took out Astrolink combined with some outrageous budget figures and billing ideas. It did die before the billing system became an issue, but the overall point was that the billing data were to be polled from the terminals frequently - so frequently that it would have eaten up quite a bit of the communication channel capacity. I happen to be aware of that since I was in that project and it was hilarious how crazy and wild it went and then suddenly the balloon did burst - quickly - and we had to sweep up the remains and close shop.
At least I had a feeling of where it was heading pretty soon and it was just to play along at the time and I didn't suffer from the aftermath.
No, it's not overkill. Overkill doesn't exist for the bedbugs.
Notice that to reach the level for killing the bugs and their eggs in the hidden parts of a building you need to exceed the heat needed to kill them in the building and make sure that the whole building gets hot enough.
But all people working in that workplace has to get their homes cleaned as well.
Add the Blue Screen of Death to the list.
Today an OS should be able to cope with driver errors and recover.
If you segment the right way productivity won't suffer. You rarely want HR to share data with software development.
But today many company networks are world-wide monolithic networks.
At least separate DCs, not necessarily air gaps and then use a less sloppy protocol than SMB to exchange needed information between servers, possibly using gateways that sanitizes any data exchanged.
The problem with many of the Microsoft protocols is that they are a "catch-all" for any operation the user or application may perform.
An AI is only as good as the people that have taught it. Of course it can accumulate experience and never forget, but humans also have a thing called intuition to see things in a different view and capture things that are completely new.
Humans and AI will however supplement each other for improved accuracy.
And in addition to this - segment your darn networks in your companies - that will contain any intrusion to a limited number of clients.
Almost all my transactions today are with cards, not cash. It can go one or two weeks between each cash transaction I make and then it's for something insignificant.
It's rare to find anything around here that don't take plastic cards.
So not carrying cash, at least in any significant amounts, is more because it's not really useful not because it's dangerous.
So that's what the Samsung phone problems really were - built in kill feature that got sour.
The problem is with new episodes and with shows that are less common. Imagine someone playing a fresh Aussie show in the US with a lot of violence on a streaming service.
You can't catch them all. Unless you integrate the monitoring device with the audio system so it can automatically filter out all that sound.
You better decide which side you are on in this case.
And keep your lawn deep-frozen all year!
Good. At least then it won't stop Google from implementing the idea in the long run even if they lost a number of patents.
And if not implemented then the idea shall end up in Public Domain.
There are way too many patents for useless and unused crap out there.
My concern over the technology is that it also can cause a non-deterministic behavior for the platform making it hard to capture elusive bugs. This means that you would need to have a way to be able to load a kernel that's mapped identically to the last time when you perform your test and development.
Bugs that only appears when you have a certain constellation and load order are sometimes wasting weeks of work.
Because money talks - even courts can profit from cases they process.
And a start-up optimization could as well have been done using 'make' and makefiles.
Tar and Feathers are so expensive these days, I'd take poison ivy instead.
Then you have Safari and Opera trailing around too.
And here's a list of more browsers: http://www.thewindowsclub.com/...
Anyway - Microsoft browsers are only useful as a last resort if you can't get anything else to work. Mostly on company intranets.
It's also hard to compare different types of waste, and that includes how easy it's to recycle the stuff - and how much any non-recycleable parts of it has to be contained when deposited.
MS-DOS appeared 35 years ago.
In this case it may even be international law and agreements that are at risk.
The stack clash - that's something that I have experienced when I coded in C on MS-DOS.
I know it was geostationary, but it's still not a very good idea regardless of which system you use. The Iridium system is alive because if covers corner cases, but satellite broadband is basically the same - good for corner cases. All the rest are better off with optical fibers. It was the spread of broadband like DSL and fibers that took out Astrolink combined with some outrageous budget figures and billing ideas. It did die before the billing system became an issue, but the overall point was that the billing data were to be polled from the terminals frequently - so frequently that it would have eaten up quite a bit of the communication channel capacity. I happen to be aware of that since I was in that project and it was hilarious how crazy and wild it went and then suddenly the balloon did burst - quickly - and we had to sweep up the remains and close shop.
At least I had a feeling of where it was heading pretty soon and it was just to play along at the time and I didn't suffer from the aftermath.
It's Astrolink all over again.
No, it's not overkill. Overkill doesn't exist for the bedbugs.
Notice that to reach the level for killing the bugs and their eggs in the hidden parts of a building you need to exceed the heat needed to kill them in the building and make sure that the whole building gets hot enough.
But all people working in that workplace has to get their homes cleaned as well.
Not a Governmental Top Secret classification, just a company top secret classification.
Just stating "Classified" doesn't indicate anything about the classification level. It can be classified as "Open" as well.