Slashdot Mirror


User: CompressedAir

CompressedAir's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
127
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 127

  1. Why did they not wait for 4.0? on iPad Progress Report · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sure seems strange to me that Apple, who sell themselves as the "complete" and "it just works" experience would release the iPad before the next version of iPhoneOS comes out. This sounds like the kind of giant pay-to-beta-test sort of thing that Apple is known for NOT doing.

    As someone who uses an iPhone and would like an iPad, Thursday will be very interesting.

    Is anyone else reminded of the 10.0 release of OSX?

  2. LOTR on Amazon Reviewers Take on the Classics · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why does it take three books for some guys to walk to a volcano?!?

  3. Bluetooth keyboard on iPad Review · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone tried it with a bluetooth keyboard? Does that integrate well?

    Interesting that it gets the iPhone web pages... that would be irritating.

    Also, any reports on how that second-monitor app works on it?

  4. Re:Tether to iPhone on iPad Jailbroken · · Score: 1

    Sweet, thanks.

  5. Tether to iPhone on iPad Jailbroken · · Score: 1

    Well, that didn't take long!

    When I can tether the $499 iPad with my iPhone, I'll probably get one to replace my Acer Aspire One.

    I have the money for the 3g version, but the idea of paying for two unlimited data plans is just offensive to me.

  6. Re:Why would nerds want this? on Next iPhone — Front-Facing Camera, A4 Processor · · Score: 1

    I dunno, I'm a pretty big nerd and I love my iPhone. There's plenty of fun to be had with it with the serial tx/rx on the dock connector. I'm getting close to getting it to work with a Picaxe, and once that works the sky is the limit.

  7. Best vision in years on Senators Blast NASA For Lacking Vision · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Disclaimer: I work for the space program, but I'm not high enough to make these decisions.

    Some people will never be happy. All the dreams of the last 50 years are about to come true, and all people can do is bitch!

    Look, chemical powered rockets have not changed much since the development of the SSME. So why are we only now getting private space launch? Because there was nowhere reasonable to go! ISS cargo is an easy enough mission for non-cutting edge rocketry, and since it is manned there is a long term need for supply flights that won't go away.

    The future looks like this:
    1. NASA guarantees it be buy x flights at y price from now until 2020.
    2. Multiple vendors (currently SpaceX, Orbital, Lockheed, Boeing, and others) use this promise to secure capital to develop launchers.
    3. Several years of regular supply flights gives ample qualification of the new boosters.
    4. Once confidence is gained, NASA transitions from buying human flights from Russians to buying flights from Americans. Lots of politicians get reelected.
    5. All the tech for better than chemical rocket launch now has a concrete mission to design for. Someone perfects laser ablative launch of cargo to ISS and does it much cheaper. Someone else gets an even cheaper launch option going.
    6. NASA works on designs for solar system manned exploration craft. Design is steady and largely free from political pressure.
    7. Private cargo launch matures, and one day both it and the NASA designs are ready.
    8. ISS, which is now a largely private operation, is sold off or deorbited at its end of life.
    9. NASA (and hell, maybe even private spacecraft) launch on commercial boosters and usher in a new era.

    Look, promises smomishes. Unfunded mandates scmuded fandates. This is the ONLY way to get beyond LEO in a sustained manner by the 2050s ( when I will retire). You all should be overjoyed.

  8. Home automation on IdeaPad U1, What We Wanted the iPad To Be · · Score: 1

    I know it isn't a huge market, but the iPad is huge news in the home automation touchscreen market. Official solutions sell for over $1k, and you'd be hard pressed to make your own (ebay'd touchscreen, plus a fanless computer mounted in the wall) for less than the cheapest iPad.

    Make a wall cradle for it with speakers, and you have control, audio, pictures (for when not in use), not to mention if you can make it show you a weather report in the morning or something.

    Indigo Touch is impressive enough that I had long planned to buy iPod touches and wall-mount them, the iPad just makes that idea even better.

  9. Sign me up for 10 on Directed Energy Weapon Downs Mosquitos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Knowing this can be done, I bet this would be pretty easy to make.

    You'd take a pan and tilt servo controlled laser, and put sound sensors around the laser. Move the laser towards the loudest noise, fire when the noise is equal on the sensors. Bingo, dead mosquito. Just like a sun tracker!

    Everything else is software, like knowing what frequency to listen to mosquitos on.

    Does anyone know:
    1. How much laser power do you need to kill a mosquito?
    2. What frequency noise do you target?
    3. Is it shark-mountable?

  10. Re:Why Firefly? on What SciFi Should Get the Reboot Treatment Next? · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, you are way off. Firefly was primarily a story about a really cool guy who wore Hawaiian shirts, played with plastic dinosaurs, married a total badass wife, made funny (ding!) informative (ding!) and insightful comments (ding!), and occasionally flew the ship.

    It is no wonder that a show without the main character would lose some appeal.

  11. The first two points on NASA and Space Station Alliance On Shaky Ground · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first two points in the article cancel each other out. To paraphrase, they are:

    1. It costs too much, so no one flies experiments, and
    2. There are too many experiments for the crew to handle.

    No one goes there anymore, it is too busy. -- Yogi Berra

    If the ISS is kept running for 5 years, we will get more out of the fifth year than we did the first year. If it is kept running 10 years, we will get more out of the 10th year than the 5th year. Launch cost will be dropping regardless of the fate of Ares, and as current research opens up new research the demand for space launch capabilities will increase. Remember, in the absolutely most boring future, the Russians could build a second Progress assembly line. The probable success of SpaceX just makes that better (notably in the "return of material" area.

    Now, is any of this worth it? That's more of a policy decision than a technical one. I think it is, half for the science and half for the global cooperation required. Remember, this International Space Station represents the efforts of 2/3 of the planet (land area-wise, heh, not population). When is the last time that has happened without there being a war in progress?

  12. Great, but... on Building a 32-Bit, One-Instruction Computer · · Score: 1

    ... is it pronounced "O-knee-der" or "O-ned-der"?

    You know, every time it does that thing it does.

  13. Re:$2000 in and counting on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 1

    Geez man, how long does that take you? You might want to look into a back-up hobby for when the little guy finally gets it.

  14. Re:Welcome to my money pit! on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 1

    Forgot to ask: What do you use for the car RFID transmitter? I use cell phone bluetooth to tell who is home, and I'm not a big fan. Detecting cars in the garage would be much more useful to me.

    Thanks.

  15. Re:Welcome to my money pit! on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 1

    Rock on, I use those same Harbor Freight mats hooked up to X10 DS10As. Ah, the DS10A, the swiss army knife of HA.

  16. Re:$2000 in and counting on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 1

    Well, we all need hobbies. What do you do with your time when the Internet is not letting you judge complete strangers?

  17. Re:$2000 in and counting on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 1

    By all means! The basics are here: http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-A-Motorized-Window-Blinds-Controller-For-Les/

    Biochemtronics is the man for posting that. My notes on modifications are in the comments.

    Good hunting!

  18. Re:$2000 in and counting on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's expensive, no question. The $2k includes the Cube ($400), the IR emitter/receiver (an iRed, $120), and what, $400 for two iPhones? Something like that. So that leaves $1k for the switches and software.

    Sounds like a lot, but it's not bad when you spread it over a few years.

  19. $2000 in and counting on What is the Current State of Home Automation? · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been automating my home for some time now, and I hope I can give you some perspective on the process.

    Modern (as in, not X10) home automation hardware comes with a steep cost of entry. For my chosen flavor (Insteon), you have to buy $60 worth of phase couplers / wireless receivers and a $80 powerline - computer interface before you can even start adding wall switches. So, unless you are just wildly flush with cash, there usually has to be a need as well as the want to get started.

    For me, my house is wired to that the driveway light switch are out in the detached garage. This was very irritating. By replacing the switch in the garage and the switch by the back door of the house with Insteon switches, I can now turn on the driveway lights from within the house. Cheaper than hiring an electrician to re-wire the switches.

    Once the initial hurdle is passed, you can do all sorts of things quickly and easily. Such as:

    1. I added a wireless switch at knee level so my 2-year old can turn on the light in her room. She LOVES this. A motion sensor turns the light off 15 minutes after she leaves. When she's older I'll set it up so she turns the light off, but I didn't want her flashing the lights on/off/on/off for an hour.
    2. The wall switch in the living room can also start/stop music playing, as well as control the volume and change songs.
    3. Using some ir-controlled home made window blind controllers I built, the blinds on the first floor of the house are controlled by the computer. Most notably, it shuts them when the sun goes down, so I don't have to worry about people seeing into the house after dark. I got real used to that real fast, let me tell ya.
    4. I've put together a "Baby Monitor of the Gods" that sends video (with sound) from an old DV camcorder to any screen in the house (mostly old laptops running Damn Small Linux loaded into RAM, but also either of the TVs). In the workout room the video comes up on the picture-in-picture, so my wife can see the baby sleeping while she exercises. Very popular feature, that.
    5. The library did not have a wall switch. Now it does. (It turns on the lamps.)
    6. I'm leaving out the basic stuff, such as being able to control a light across the house from the bedroom. Very nice when you are getting ready for bed.
    7. Everything is also controllable from our iPhones.
    8. Next up is door locks, and after that probably HVAC. Part of me really wants to do computer controlled zoned HVAC, but the other part hates working in the attic. Choices, choices.

    All of this runs from a Mac Cube running Indigo. I cannot say enough good things about Indigo, it is one truly great piece of home automation software.

    So to sum up, the state of home automation is fantastic. With the relay control modules, you can control just about anything. Add IR control to that and there's not much left beyond your reach. Blind and drapes control is very expensive to buy off the shelf for some reason, but building your own is easy enough.

    Good luck (and keep count of how many times you mix up the load and line wires)!

    Brian

  20. Re:But what science? on Excalibur Almaz To Offer Commercial Orbital Flights · · Score: 1

    That's a good point.

  21. But what science? on Excalibur Almaz To Offer Commercial Orbital Flights · · Score: 1

    Wow, Almaz. Never thought I'd hear that name again.

    I wonder, what science do they think people will be using this for? I guess it could replace some of the Shuttle-only payloads we used to fly, but for anything else the ISS is a much more capable research laboratory. I should know, keeping them doing science is my job these days.

    I guess it might have better downmass? Usually, though, you only want to bring it home if you think the long term exposure effects are interesting. This won't be very long term.

    All that said, very cool, and the more the merrier!

  22. Without Delay on NASA's Cashflow Problem Puts Moon Trip In Doubt · · Score: 1

    Back when the Bush Vision for Space Exploration was started up, the Congressman for the area around Johnson Space Center was Tom Delay, the Speaker of the House. Now, it is someone with much less clout. I think this is really just a return to not having friends in high places (be those friends ever so scumbagish).

    I think we have to question why, at the precise moment in history when a US commercial space flight company is nearing completion of the first ever non-government rocket AND manned space craft, we want to develop another rocket on government funds. Let SpaceX use any NASA facilities they need, and if they succeed with the Falcon/Dragon then give them a contract. That could be as soon as 2011!

    NASA should aim for the next big leap after rockets. Take all that ARES money and invest in laser propulsion, nuclear propulsion, space fountains, VASIMR derivitives, who knows. THAT is the way to really bust space wide open for the common man. That is the way to make sure that when when our astronauts meet the Chinese astronauts on the moon, they will be offering individual bottles of beer and we will be sharing entire coolers of beer. Even if they got their beer there before us.

    (For those of you worried about the international rammifications of sharing American beer in space, NASA is partnering with the Canadians. The Canadians can be in charge of robotic manipulators and malt beverages.)

  23. Helicopter Pilot on $2 Million NASA Power Beaming Challenge Heating Up · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA: "We'd like you to hover for a few hours dangling a cable."

    Pilot: "Boring!"

    NASA: "Oh, and several teams will be shooting lasers in your direction."

    Pilot: "Now you're talking!"

  24. What a horrible summary! on F-22 Raptor Cancelled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The F-22 is already in service! They just cancelled the next order of planes.

    I agree with this decision. The F-35 is still a better fighter than just about anything else out there, and is also an excellent multi-role attack craft. Not to mention much cheaper per unit than an F-22.

    The value of the F-22 lies in that it is probably the best fighter in the world for many years. Any adversary who intends to fight a conventional war against the US (cricket... cricket... but hey, we do expect our military to be prepared, so I'm not complaining) has to act as if the most badass fighter in the world will be contesting air superiority. That is a healthy kick towards solving things with diplomacy.

  25. Re:Too expensive on ZigBee Pro, the New Home Automation Standard? · · Score: 1

    I'd certainly love the switches to be cheaper, but lets be realistic. My house is worth (in this oh-so-wonderful housing market) $170,000. To automate all switches, computer control, whole house music, all that good stuff, would be about $5000 using a mixture of Insteon, X10, and IR. That's 3% of the house, spread over as many years as needed. That assumes I'd do all the work, of course, but this stuff is so easy you'd be crazy not to.

    So for 3% of the value of my house, not even caring about any added value the automation gives the house, I can fully automate my house. Not $1 a switch, but hardly that bad.