Slashdot Mirror


iPad Progress Report

Now that the 300,000 early adopters have had a few days to play and work with their iPads, we're moving beyond the "first impressions" articles (but here's a video of a 2-1/2-year-old's first encounter with the device). The detailed reviews aren't out yet. The largest source of early complaints is a complex of problems with Wi-Fi reception. Apple has posted a technical support note implicitly acknowledging the problems and suggesting some work-arounds — specifically, changing SSIDs or encryption methods on base stations that offer both 2.4-GHz and 5.8-GHz signals. Finally, here's a detailed look at the gratuitous pain Apple imposes on those desiring to get iWork files transferred from and to the iPad.

374 comments

  1. The baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She really smashes that poor iPad :(

    1. Re:The baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Re:The baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why smash when it will blend?

    3. Re:The baby by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      I know that's the question that's been on My mind!

    4. Re:The baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:The baby by moonbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Literally nobody who's interested in buying an iPad will be surprised that the other side does not contain a second screen (or a second iPad) -- don't be ridiculous. And saying that it's designed to "look like" some MS vaporware product that nobody has ever heard of so far is just as silly. I'd say the case looks a bit odd to me, plasticky; but I've never been one for protective cases, anyway.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:The baby by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      There goes any possible fear of lithium batteries

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    7. Re:The baby by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is selling ~300,000 units in one day disappointing?

    8. Re:The baby by reidconti · · Score: 1

      I hope you're shorting Apple stock, because otherwise you look like a total moron for having such a vested interest in a product failing.

    9. Re:The baby by exomondo · · Score: 1

      That's the life of an 'analyst', it doesn't matter if you're wrong, just so long as you predict something other than what it is expected.

    10. Re:The baby by pastafazou · · Score: 1, Insightful

      300,000 units is a significant quantity for an initial release. Comparing it to the release of the iPhone or the iPod, the numbers are much larger for the iPad. Now look at the numbers the iPod and iPhone are doing years later, and you can guess that the iPad is going to be a pretty successful platform.

    11. Re:The baby by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They didn't sell 300,000 units in one day, or even one weekend. They sold 300,000 on 4 months of constant hype and reporting, and finally completed those sales in one weekend.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re:The baby by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      I've dropped my Iphone a million times, no screen protection... its a trooper. They can take a beating. No scratches either.

      A couple dings on the side bezel though ;)

    13. Re:The baby by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      some MS vaporware product that nobody has ever heard of so far

      Vaporware? The Apple tablet/Istale was rumoured and pre-announced and announced for years before it was finally released. And the only reason people have heard about it is because of all the free hype they got given.

      Sure, if you only read Slashdot, you'll only hear about Apple products, but just because you haven't heard about it doesn't mean anything.

      (I see Apple moderation is back on form: -1 for anyone who dares to criticise, and insightful for anyone who supports them. Who's getting all the mod points these days? They're the only stories I browse at -1, because the system's broken.)

    14. Re:The baby by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The Ipad got months of overwhelming amounts of media coverage. This isn't one day's worth, it several months' worth of sales. Honestly, with all that free advertising they got, it would be shocking if they didn't sell some. Pretty much anyone who would want one already knew about it long ago. You also have to factor in that for Apple fans, they haven't had the option of a netbook, so you've got all the people waiting since around 2007 (it's the same idea as people queuing up to by the Iphone 3G - it's hardly surprising they're queuing up, if they had to wait years after 3G became mainstream in other phones).

      I don't know what the early sales of the Ipod were like, but did it get anywhere near the same amount of publicity?

      Now look at the numbers the iPod and iPhone are doing years later

      Which? Those are two products, one of which is market leader, the other isn't anywhere near market leader.

    15. Re:The baby by English+French+Man · · Score: 1

      MS vaporware product that nobody has ever heard of so far.

      Oh my... I'm classified as nobody then... as are a number of the people I know! Seriously, I'm not even interested in notebook-like devices and I heard of it.

      The fact that Apple likes to communicate three months before launching something they have been working on for years and that Microsoft prefers to communicate a short time after they just began to work on something doesn't say anything about the "vaporware" status. Who knows about the deadlines of Apple's iPad when the project wasn't known to the public?

      Your point is still perfectly valid though, the iPad case is not made to look like a Courier Tablet, anyone vaguely interested in the iPad, or living in an industrialized country would know it was a one-sided tablet.

      --
      If I'm wrong, please correct me ; learning is better than being right.
    16. Re:The baby by English+French+Man · · Score: 1

      And that would also be because the iPhone had made a lot more sales on its first weekend too.

      --
      If I'm wrong, please correct me ; learning is better than being right.
    17. Re:The baby by English+French+Man · · Score: 1

      This is not entirely true. iPad would benefit from the iPhone and iPod Touch popularity, because it is something relatively similar.

      On the other hand, lots of early adopters doesn't necessarily mean success of a platform. Lots of early adopters is a sign that the hype is working well. It could fail later. I'm waiting too see how the iPad will sale on the long run.

      --
      If I'm wrong, please correct me ; learning is better than being right.
    18. Re:The baby by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Who's getting all the mod points these days?

      Probably me. But I don't always bother, so I tend to lose at least as many points as I use. Oh, and although I am a part-time Apple user (when not on Linux), I'm not a fanboy. Contary to popular belief, some of us are actually capable of exercising our brains.

    19. Re:The baby by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Note that after smashing it on the base a couple of times, you can still see the virtual keyboard popping up on the screen. Very fragile build, ehh?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  2. early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF is that?

    1. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      An early adopter or lighthouse customer is an early customer of a given company, product, or technology; in politics, fashion, art, and other fields, this person would be referred to as a trendsetter. The term originates from Everett M. Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations (1962)[1].

      Typically this will be a customer that, in addition to using the vendor's product or technology, will also provide considerable and candid feedback to help the vendor refine its future product releases, as well as the associated means of distribution, service, and support.

      The relationship is synergistic, with the customer having early (and sometimes unique, or at least uniquely early) access to an advantageous new product or technology.

      In exchange for being an early adopter, and thus being exposed to the problems, risks, and annoyances common to early-stage product testing and deployment, the lighthouse customer is given especially attentive vendor assistance and support, even to the point of having personnel at the customer's work site to assist with implementation. The customer is often given preferential pricing, terms, and conditions.

      The vendor, on the other hand, benefits from receiving early revenues, and also from a lighthouse customer's endorsement and assistance in further developing the product and its go-to-market mechanisms. Acquiring lighthouse customers is a common step in new product development and implementation. The real-world focus that this type of relationship can bring to a vendor can be extremely valuable.

      Early adoption does come with pitfalls: early versions of products may be buggy and/or prone to malfunction (such as the Commodore 64 or Xbox 360) or prematurely obsolete (8 track tapes, Betamax, HD DVD). Furthermore, more efficient, less expensive versions of the product usually appear a few months after the initial release.[1] The trend of new technology costing more at release is colloquially referred to as the "early adopter tax".

      Or shortly, a fanboi.

    2. Re:early adaptor? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the grandparent post was commenting on kdawson using "early adapter" instead of "early adopter" in the post. Presumably, an early adapter is someone who is among the first to adapt to the revolutionary new world that the Jesus Tablet brings us.

    3. Re:early adaptor? by cstdenis · · Score: 1

      Even for kdawson that is bad.

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    4. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      desiring toget iWork....

      wtf does he do? Really, wtf does he do?

    5. Re:early adaptor? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      See, I figured an early adapter was someone who started hacking an Apple product as soon as it went on sale, even before anyone had figured out what it was good for.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    6. Re:early adaptor? by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:early adaptor? by cabjf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that 2 1/2 year old would be both an early adopter and an early adapter.

    8. Re:early adaptor? by MoFoQ · · Score: 1, Interesting

      at first I thought it was a typo too....but then realized that "adapter" is more fitting that "adopter"....as ppl who do buy 'em will have to "adapt" to using it (and later deciding not to use it)

    9. Re:early adaptor? by alphax45 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You sir have made me LOL at the end of my day and for that I thank you.

      --
      K Man
    10. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that is great, but has nothing to do with the question, which was "What is an early adaptor"

      The grandparent was pointing out the typographical error in the blurb. "Now that the 300,000 early adaptors have had a few days to play and work with their iPads..."

    11. Re:early adaptor? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Early Adapter: (n.) Someone who can actually bend his mind around why this thing might be useful, and then buy one, and then show how useful it is to those who can adapt to the Apple Way (taking whatever it is they put out and making it the most useful piece of one's collection. Yes, every Apple iProduct is the most useful one to an early adapter). Anyone else will be unable to see what good can come of this, and they will continue to make whatever jokes they can about the iProduct (in the case of the iPad, perhaps a bunch of one-liner puns about menstruation).

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    12. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the early adaptor was the "2-1/2-year-old".

    13. Re:early adaptor? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      It's for when I take my iPad to the UK and Germany. I get one of those three way AC adapters so it works no matter which country I'm in.

    14. Re:early adaptor? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Come now. It's been years since the MacOS was single tasking. They had that whole takeover of Apple by NeXT that fixed that problem. (the native Apple developers couldn't code their way out of a cardboard box when it comes to a multi-user multitasking OS- they spent millions proving that in the 90's)

    15. Re:early adaptor? by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's apple. You have to change to fit its model of the interface between a human and a computer. Losing 40 lbs and putting on a turtleneck sweater wouldn't hurt.

    16. Re:early adaptor? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to the fact that the iPhone and the iPad don't let the user run more than one app at once.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:early adaptor? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Anyone else will be unable to see what good can come of this, and they will continue to make whatever jokes they can about the iProduct (in the case of the iPad, perhaps a bunch of one-liner puns about menstruation).

      Psht. We're all gentlemen here. Nobody on Slashdot would ever sink to such lows. That's the end of it. Argument over. Period.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Early Adapter is the process of releasing a product prior to a USB, camera, and flash implementation.

    19. Re:early adaptor? by justinb26 · · Score: 1

      Judging by your username, I'm going to guess you're a developer. If so, you understand how fiercely users will cling to the status quo, however inefficient or obsolete it may be.

      Are you saying that technology should be first and foremost about keeping users in their comfort zone? Because I think we're muddying the line between "familiar" and "intuitive". Apple will gladly torpedo one to achieve the other.

    20. Re:early adaptor? by macs4all · · Score: 0, Troll

      (the native Apple developers couldn't code their way out of a cardboard box when it comes to a multi-user multitasking OS- they spent millions proving that in the 90's)

      BZZZT! Wrong!

      It was more like the scope of the project (Pink, Taligent, Copland, Gershwin, Rhapsody) kept growing and being re-defined. But I'm sure that is a concept that is completely foreign to most devs. that read /. And BTW, did you know about the other big names that failed on the way to OS X?

      Here's some info on that.

      So, I guess Apple, IBM, Sun, HP and Microsoft ALL suck at multi-user programming, right?

    21. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooooosh. That went completely over your head, huh?

    22. Re:early adaptor? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Yup. he is going to adopt the technology and adapt to the closed nature of the device. Imagine growing up thinking its normal to not have full control of any computing device you own and also tolerate content censoring or filtering. Its a corporate wet dream and our worst nightmare.

    23. Re:early adaptor? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Intuitive does not exist. Everything on a computer is either a metaphor for something already learned, or a convention unique to computers that must be learned.

    24. Re:early adaptor? by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Losing 40 lbs and putting on a turtleneck sweater wouldn't hurt.

      Won't somebody think of the turtles?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    25. Re:early adaptor? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It's for when I take my iPad to the UK and Germany. I get one of those three way AC adapters so it works no matter which country I'm in.

      It's for when I take my iPad to the UK and Germany. I get one of those three way AC adapters so it burns the house to the ground no matter which country I'm in.
      FTFY

      (I think there was a scare a few years ago with the iSomething getting recalled for burning cables, but WTF, I could probalby make the same joke about batteries if I could be bothered.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    26. Re:early adaptor? by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      a whoosh is the rushing sound of air that may or may not be heard as the sole point of the parent post goes flying past overhead.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    27. Re:early adaptor? by caerwyn · · Score: 1

      This is disingenuous. At the time when someone begins using a new device, they can be expected to have a certain set of knowledge and familiarity with certain other devices. Within that context, the new device could very well be "intuitive" in that the functions are naturally discovered and do not require that the user "re-think" the processes in order to accomplish a goal.

      --
      The ringing of the division bell has begun... -PF
    28. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still use those!

    29. Re:early adaptor? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      they can be expected to have a certain set of knowledge and familiarity

      Which is exactly the point I was making in opposition to the person I replied to. As I have said elsewhere, people find the iPad "intuitive" because they've been using an iPhone for three years. They found the iPhone "intuitive" because they've been using smartphones for ten yeas. They found smartphones "intuitive" because they've been using computers for twenty years.

    30. Re:early adaptor? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Me too, I love my Sansa Clip. I love how anything non-Apple even in comments gets modded down - why worry about debating which product is best, when they can just pretend competition doesn't even exist?

      I wouldn't have heard about this product by reading Slashdot though. Instead I had to look in mainstream consumer sites. I remember when Slashdot used to be a site to learn about tech products, including the alternative ones that were less well known about. Now it seems to be the reverse.

    31. Re:early adaptor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's children all the way down

  3. Other solutions to the wifi problem by adeelarshad82 · · Score: 4, Informative

    other solutions to the wi-fi problems.

    1. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Informative

      From your link Apple suggests:
      1. update your router's firmware
      2. change your router's location
      3. set your router to operate on one 802.11 standard
      4. change your router's security
      5. rename your networks

      In the reported cases only the newly released iPad is having problems, but according to Apple the problem is with your router.

    2. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Aww... it was funnier when I thought his link was a disguised recommendation to “buy a PC”.

      (Yes, I know that “Macs are PCs too”. No need to tell me...)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the reported cases only the newly released iPad is having problems, but according to Apple the problem is with your router.

      Well, obviously. If you have two devices, one of which is perfect, and a problem, obviously the device that is not perfect is the problem.

      What do they teach you kids in logic these days?

    4. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's apple alright. The fact you might have ten different devices from various manufacturers successfully working with the router already doesn't count. The Job's reality distortion field removes everything without an apple logo.

    5. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by clone53421 · · Score: 0

      Yes, Macs are “closed” (you are contractually required to run an Apple OS on them), but what part of “personal computer” implies that it can’t be “closed” in this way?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by clone53421 · · Score: 0

      Crap. Got that backward.

      You are contractually required to run Apple OSs on Apple hardware. No restriction that I know of exists in the other direction: You are free to run a Windows OS on Apple hardware.

      I’m not familiar with what you call “proprietary hoops”, i.e. BootCamp, so I really can’t comment on that. Never mind.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    7. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by RJHelms · · Score: 5, Informative

      At the very least, step 1 is not so absurd.

      A while back, the girlfriend bought a Macbook, which was the first Apple device that ever tried to connect to my router over WiFi. Even 6" away from the router, the Macbook would not connect; any PC we tried would work all (15 feet) across the apartment.

      I was prepared to chalk it up to shoddy Apple networking hardware, but on a whim tried a firmware upgrade. Lo and behold, after the router rebooted the Macbook immediately recognized it and connected without issue.

      I have no idea what/where the actually problem was, but if Apple had suggested the exact same list of steps to me they would've been right on the money.

    8. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by yali · · Score: 1

      And here's one for when all else fails.

    9. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nonsense.

      There is very little barrier to running whatever OS you want to on your Mac. The fact that the "BIOS" allows for this is not different from the fact that the BIOS on any other PC supports booting up Windows, Linux, FreeBSD or Solaris.

      A Mac comes with what you need to get it running something other than MacOS.

      That's a bit different from needing to hack the device in some way to achieve this (ipod, appletv).

      Although once you hack an AppleTV you will see that it too is pretty much just a PC.

      The only reason I don't have more Macs running Linux is that the PC market in general caught up and now the price and feature advantages of a mini aren't there anymore. This will happen with tablets too soon enough. Although the ipad will gain a lot more traction by that time when compared to minis.

      It's not really accurate to call Apple a computer company anymore...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Altus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There were some problems with older routers dealing with 802.11g devices when those first came out. I ran into that myself. The entire network would lock up shortly after a G device was connected to it. Since my router was pretty old (802.11 b I think) I just picked up a new one anyway.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    11. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by stewbacca · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If you have two devices, one of which is perfect, and a problem, obviously the device that is not perfect is the problem.

      Not so simple, I'm afraid. What if, say, both devices can link to a wireless router, but the wireless router can only communicate to the first one that connects. That would be the fault of the router's design, not the second device that can't connect.

    12. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      It's not really accurate to call Apple a computer company anymore...

      Absolute rubbish. Total tosh of the highest quality.

      Of course Apple are a computer company. Everything they do has its roots in computing.

      I can understand the anti-Apple stance taken by a lot of /. posters, but you're starting to wander into total fantasy now.

    13. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You deserve to be modded down for that tripe.

      Bootcamp exists only to help Windows play nicely with an installed OS X. You can simply erase the hard drive and install either Windows or Linux as a fresh install and never touch Apple software again.

      The rest of your post is just inane trolling, and not worth commenting.

    14. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you are contractually obligated to run Apple OSes on 'Apple Branded hardware.'

      When I bought my iPod Touch, it came with several Apple stickers in the box that solve that problem. Apple has been putting those Apple Stickers in the box with their products for decades. I think I have some from the 90's Mac era.

      Slap the label on your clone box. You're set!

    15. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what/where the actually problem was, but if Apple had suggested the exact same list of steps to me they would've been right on the money.

      I have no idea what the problem actually was either, but lets assume its a defect of the router software. Even if that's the case the fault is still on the macbook, in my opinion. The windows PCs worked. The Mac could have been programmed so that it worked too.

      Even if the actual defect was the router software, the Mac should have coped with it.

      I don't have the luxury of upgrading the router firmware everywhere I go, and if the router firmware works fine with all the Windows PCs that attach to it, then the Mac is doing something DIFFERENT.

      While that 'different' may, strictly speaking, be ok according to the standards, that doesn't really matter. What matters is that it just works when I arrive somewhere with wifi that I need to connect to.

    16. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by macs4all · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have no idea what the problem actually was either, but lets assume its a defect of the router software. Even if that's the case the fault is still on the macbook, in my opinion. The windows PCs worked. The Mac could have been programmed so that it worked too.

      Even if the actual defect was the router software, the Mac should have coped with it.

      You do realize, of course, that many peripheral manufacturers not only test against Windows ONLY; but also silently program around bugs in Microsoft's implementations of standards in general.

      Apple is absolutely correct to follow the published standard to the letter. Afterall, isn't that why it's called a STANDARD?

    17. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      This is the rationale Microsoft uses for maintaining cruft in IE's rendering engine.
      Why should apple put extra code into their firmware because someone else's firmware doesn't follow standards?

    18. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by reidconti · · Score: 1

      Apply this same logic to sites that work in IE but not Firefox.

    19. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I'm no fanboi, but I would hazard a guess that the issues you encountered were because the Mac followed the spec more precisely than the Windows boxes. Hell, web developers have to code around M$ bugs, why would you think firmware developers don't suffer the same abuse ? It is far easier to mangle your $30 gadget until it works, than to brow-beat Microsoft and all its OEMs until they release non-retarded drivers.

      I wouldn't even be surprised to find such workarounds in Apple Airport routers, to accomodate the quirks in cheap WiFi hardware found in older PC laptops. Think of it this way: if it's a challenge for Linux to support the fucked up NDIS drivers, then it has to be a real puzzle trying to make sense of mangled WiFi packets over the air.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    20. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realize, of course, that many peripheral manufacturers not only test against Windows ONLY; but also silently program around bugs in Microsoft's implementations of standards in general.

      Quite aware.

      Apple is absolutely correct to follow the published standard to the letter.

      In most situations yes, I would agree. However in any situation where one (e.g. Apple) is deploying your minority of hardware into an established environment, the onus falls on them to ensure their hardware works in that environment.

      Afterall, isn't that why it's called a STANDARD?

      In an ideal world sure. In the world in which I live I can update the firmware in my Mac so that it copes with a flawed router at starbucks or my hotel or a clients office, I can't update the firmware at starbucks, the hotel, or a clients office.

      My laptop is only valuable and useful if it works in these places. And so far, its been pretty hit and miss. So far, I've had to replace my home router to satisfy my newest mac; I had to downgrade a friends mac from snow leopard back to leopard so that it would work on an office network he did not control, and I've had to suffer through unbearable internet at a hotel on multiple occasions, while my wifes pc worked flawlessly.

      Finally, all this assumes Apple actually followed the standard and its all these vendors with horrific buggy systems. Quite bluntly, Apple is not perfect, and it would be absurd to presume they got everything right, and its all these other vendors who keep getting it wrong. Some of the technical blame lies at apples feet.

      And some of the blame that genuinely lies at the feet of other vendors COULD be resolved by Apple if it were so inclined. And it SHOULD take ownership of solving these issues when it can. Customers want laptops that 'just work'; that's what they keep promising.

      And above all, in my experience, a lot of the problems could be resolved within a subset of the standard. Often a standard specifies behavior X, and a device doesn't implement this properly, and windows isn't affected because it never requests behavior X. If that's the case, Apple could make their software work too with all these devices, by simply avoiding feature X. Note that by doing this Apple would STILL be following the standard to the letter.

    21. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This is the rationale Microsoft uses for maintaining cruft in IE's rendering engine.

      And its a real legitimate issue for them. They can't just go break millions of websites for millions of people, particularly enterprise apps.

      Why should apple put extra code into their firmware because someone else's firmware doesn't follow standards?

      So that when I visit a site with someone elses firmware my laptop is more than an $1800 paperweight.

      Let me turn the question around. What EXACTLY is the value to me, the customer, in Apple NOT putting extra code into their firmware to ensure it works even when the access point/router/gateway/whatever doesn't?

    22. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by indiechild · · Score: 1

      I find it weird that with all these standards in place, that incompatibilities still exist.

      I've been running a Linksys WRT54G for many years and I've never had any connection problems with any of my Macs or Windows PCs. I'm going to stick with Linksys if I ever upgrade and get a faster router.

    23. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by ekhben · · Score: 1

      I have a Billion ADSL WiFi router that my ISP supplied me.

      I have, right beside it, a WRT54G running the dd-wrt firmware, because the Billion router and the Mac Mini disagree somewhere, somehow, and stop sharing broadcast packets, which breaks ARP and mDNS.

      The Billion is also running a wifi network, because the Windows XP devices in the house can't handle WPA2PSK.

      Technology. Is awesome.

    24. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      What I find curious about this is that Apple doesn't reallly "roll their own" in terms of wireless networking hardware. Virtually any Apple product of fairly recent vintage is just running whatever Broadcom silicon happens to be current(the really old, first-gen "airport" stuff was Lucent; but all the recent stuff has been Broadcom).

      Broadcom is a huge supplier of wireless silicon to the PC industry generally. Your average cheap wintel laptop also has a Broadcom wifi chip in it(not all do; but a decent chunk). More than a few routers are based on Broadcom SoiCs, as well.

      Since this is so, Broadcom obviously knows how to (mostly) make their wifi gear work with other wifi gear. They do it all the time. Since Apple is a pretty good Broadcom customer, I'm assuming that they either get driver code from Broadcom, or get plenty of information(though almost certainly under NDA, judging by the fun that team Linux has had dealing with Broadcom) on how to implement their own driver code for Broadcom's stuff.

      Unless Mac wifi drivers are broken at the OS interface level(which seems highly unlikely, since Apple is otherwise reasonably competent at writing drivers for its own OS), it is something of a mystery what the issue would be. They are using commodity silicon, exactly the same as many PC vendors, and one would assume that a lot of the wifi-specific complexity is done in firmware by Broadcom.

    25. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I had to downgrade a friends mac from snow leopard back to leopard so that it would work on an office network he did not control

      Do you have specific info about what the problem is/was? Did you upgrade to the latest software update?

      If none of that worked, did you write up a bug at bugreport.apple.com?

    26. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by SETIGuy · · Score: 0

      The obvious solution....

      6. Don't buy a new product on the first day it's available and expect it to be bug free.

    27. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Whoosh crew - Humor cleanup on isle 2.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    28. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm no fanboi, but I would hazard a guess that the issues you encountered were because the Mac followed the spec more precisely than the Windows boxes.

      Look, I'm a /. reader. The router I had to replace to satisfy my new Macbook Pro worked fine for years. It was fine with my XP box, my fathers dell laptop with Vista, my toshiba laptop running ubuntu, and the unit I was running the Windows 7 beta on. It also ran fine with my Nintendo Wii and my wife's blackberry. (I have an iphone, but I don't use its wifi since I have far more data via 3G than I need, so I have wifi off.)

      But no, your probably right, the reason the Mac choked up and constantly lost connection was that it "followed the spec more closely" than all these other units, several of which are not even based on windows. ;)

      I honestly believe you when you say your no fanboi, but when you have a set of disparate devices that all work together fine, and then you add a new device in and the new device doesn't work, frankly its absurd to presume as your default starting point that the new device "must follow the specs better".

    29. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Unless Mac wifi drivers are broken at the OS interface level(which seems highly unlikely, since Apple is otherwise reasonably competent at writing drivers for its own OS), it is something of a mystery what the issue would be.

      Agreed. And to really drive the point home. The macbook pro booted to Windows 7 in bootcamp copes with the wireless network on that router just fine, so its not the Apple (Broadcom) hardware. Its ridiculous.

    30. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Do you have specific info about what the problem is/was?

      Unit was one of the first 17" MacBook Pro's. 2GB of RAM.

      After upgrading from Leopard to Snow Leopard the internet was 'slow'. Pages would take several seconds to load. Some pages failed to load. Ping times were all over the map, packets were dropped. Various forum searches seemed to indicate we were not alone. This affected both wifi AND wired access, on multiple networks.

      Wiped the unit installed snow leopard clean. Performed all updates. Internet was still absurdly slow.
      Performed various 'tips' such as rebooting, deleting various prefs, setting up a 2nd location, etc. No improvement.
      Some tips we didn't bother with... static ip, manual duplex settings etc ... even if they worked would not be a solution, the laptop is used all over the place. It needs to just work when it gets there, I can't have the guy futzing around with custom settings for each network he connects to. He's just not 'that guy'.

      Wiped the unit installed leopard clean. Performed all updates for leopard. Internet blistered along as it always had everywhere we tried it.

      Did you upgrade to the latest software update?

      Yes.

      If none of that worked, did you write up a bug at bugreport.apple.com

      No. It needed to work now. Not 'eventually'. If it was my laptop I'd have done so... but I'm not likely to see his unit again anytime soon, to further troubleshoot, or to try snow leopard again, etc.

    31. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, it will be interesting to see if Apple updates the iPad, or if we get a dozen router manufacturers all offering "fixes" for their products via firmware updates.

      From the GP's linked article:
      "most users on the forum who are running completely Apple-based networks are not having the same issue"

      I'll bet they're not. Well done Apple. I wonder where they learnt that tactic from...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    32. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Slap the label on your clone box. You're set!

      And watch your hackentosh break when it gets update patches from Apple.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    33. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      There is very little barrier to running whatever OS you want to on your Mac. The fact that the "BIOS" allows for this is not different from the fact that the BIOS on any other PC supports booting up Windows, Linux, FreeBSD or Solaris.

      A Mac comes with what you need to get it running something other than MacOS.

      That's a bit different from needing to hack the device in some way to achieve this (ipod, appletv).

      Although once you hack an AppleTV you will see that it too is pretty much just a PC.

      The only reason I don't have more Macs running Linux is that the PC market in general caught up and now the price and feature advantages of a mini aren't there anymore. This will happen with tablets too soon enough. Although the ipad will gain a lot more traction by that time when compared to minis.

      It's not really accurate to call Apple a computer company anymore...

      I feel stating that if the BIOS supports it, then it's a PC isn't right since my PS3 allows (at the moment) the ability to install another OS (Linux). My PS3 doesn't suddenly become a PC just because I was able to introduce a new OS onto it, it's still a gaming console lacking the ability to add/remove hardware from other sources. I feel it's like stating a Sega Dreamcast is a PC because it can run Linux wihtout needing to bypass a security lock (all the orignal DC's didn't have security checks.). Just because people are able to do these things doesn't mean that the device itself becomes a PC or then just about any device that can read code can pretty much be declared a PC since with the desire and will you can get some OS to run on it. A PC is more then just a device that can run an OS, its beyond what something that isn't a PC can emulate, like declaring a AL program like the Sims is real life since everyone there can eat, sleep, play, work, feel emotions, reproduce just like real life. My 2 cents all in all

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    34. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      The world is just not *ready* for the ipad ...

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    35. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by dynamo52 · · Score: 1

      You haven't installed SP2 yet?

      --
      Like this comment? I accept Bitcoin! - 153sc8UUBXyp12ofQqfAWDmJrzyiKCYC1x
    36. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by ekhben · · Score: 1

      In one case, no, the machine was on its last legs (and has since died) and I really didn't care about updating something used once a month. In the other case, yes, but the hardware itself doesn't support WPA.

      I really want to wire the house for GE, but time and money are scarce resources.

    37. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh crew - Humor cleanup on isle 2.

      Aisle.

    38. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Apple is absolutely correct to follow the published standard to the letter. Afterall, isn't that why it's called a STANDARD?

      Problem is, most may be 802.11n, which has only recently been ratified. A lot of users have pre-ratified firmware (and perhaps hardware if pre draft 1), also the majority of consumers either do not know how to update their firmware, or do not know their AP was pre-ratification for the standard.

      My Netgear DG834N v1 used to be buggy on 'n', both on my Macs and Sony laptops. Firmware update fixed the Sony, but the Macs did not want to stay stable, and it was I was only getting 2-4Mb/s, so I fell back on to 'g' which was maximum strength and speed. It was only until last month I decided to take my Netgear apart, to find there was no third antenna, so I installed a third one. I'm currently on the other side of my house to the router, and enjoying 108Mb/s on my Mac.

    39. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no. You don't have the authority to brand something as Apple, so that (often repeated) suggestion is totally false.

    40. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs, iRouter please

    41. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by RJHelms · · Score: 1

      I've been running a Linksys WRT54G for many years and I've never had any connection problems with any of my Macs or Windows PCs. I'm going to stick with Linksys if I ever upgrade and get a faster router.

      Interesting... the router I had to do the firmware upgrade on was also a WRT54G.

    42. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by harl · · Score: 1

      Example documenting your claim please.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    43. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      No, you are contractually obligated to run Apple OSes on 'Apple Branded hardware.'

      IANAL, but I understand contract law and licensing law are separate animals, and licenses are not as binding as contracts. Despite pressing "I agree" you don't actually sign anything; the thing you're agreeing to is just a license, and unreasonable license requirements are sometimes judged invalid by the courts. If you bought a valid copy of OS X and ran it on a non-Mac I doubt anything bad would happen to you (aside from finding out your OS has stopped working after installing an update designed to deliberately sabotage your type of installation from your friends in Cupertino).

      None of which contradicts the core idea of your statement, of course. The Psystar lawsuit was about this specific license requirement and Psystar argued that it's not valid. They lost this argument and are appealing.

    44. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      You'll what?

    45. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      It's not really accurate to call Apple a computer company anymore...

      Absolute rubbish. Total tosh of the highest quality.

      Of course Apple are a computer company. Everything they do has its roots in computing.

      I can understand the anti-Apple stance taken by a lot of /. posters, but you're starting to wander into total fantasy now.

      Especially since he bases his whole argument on "everything Apple builds is a PC really".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    46. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      You do realize, of course, that many peripheral manufacturers not only test against Windows ONLY; but also silently program around bugs in Microsoft's implementations of standards in general.

      Quite aware.

      Apple is absolutely correct to follow the published standard to the letter.

      um you do know that thers a lot of parts of wifi where the "standard" is silent and left to the implimentator.

      Apple do seem to have history when it comes to wifi - so I suspect that apple is more at fault here.

    47. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight: when Microsoft breaks a standard and a router manufacturer also breaks the standard to get around the flaw in MS's implementation and Linux breaks the standard to get around the flaw in the implementation of the router manufacturer - Apple is evil for sticking to the standard, even when all you have to do is update the router firmware so that it follows the standard again while still working with Windows. And that logic is fucking insightful.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    48. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      I agree with the practicality of making something work regardless, but I think the distinction here is the pure volume.

      Everyone makes their device work with Windows, because Windows has such a humongous marketshare that there's no choice but to work around Microsoft's flaws in implementing the standard.

      Do you really expect Apple to test every router ever released at every firmware level? The volume of released routers multiplied by their firmware revisions makes that pretty much impossible.

      I'm assuming those routers with flaws in implementating the standard fail to work with many other devices too (game consoles, phones, etc.) even if they manage to work with Windows. So yes, in this case I don't think it's realistic to blame Apple for not working in every possible environment where the standard is implemented incorrectly. The onus is on the router manufacturer (and ultimately, unfortunately, the end user) to update the router firmware to work correctly.

    49. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      even when all you have to do is update the router firmware so that it follows the standard again while still working with Windows.

      "all you have to do is" ??

      Let ME get this straight. All I have to do is update the router firm ware at the airport / hotel / starbucks / client site / friends house / etc...? Easy as pie right, I'm sure they'll all just let me update the firmware on their equipment to get my obviously 'perfect mac' working. Easy as pie. In fact, I'm surprised I still have issues... you'd think the last guy to visit any of these places with a mac would have already fixed it...

      Did you read what I wrote before posting? Did you read what YOU wrote before posting?

    50. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Do you really expect Apple to test every router ever released at every firmware level? The volume of released routers multiplied by their firmware revisions makes that pretty much impossible.

      No I don't expect them to test with every possible device. I recognize the hopelessness of it. I -do- expect them to be MUCH better at taking ownership of issues though, and making an effort to fix them. Its not like I'm an isolated case. And its utter b.s. for them to simply claim 'its their faulty implementation. we followed the spec perfectly'.

      As another poster noted some areas of the spec are vague. Other areas of the spec have been implemented by Microsoft a certain way and the industry has followed along. Apple doesn't get to just pick up the spec and do there own thing, and make there own clarifications up where the spec is vague. That just breaks their devices ability to interoperate with the rest of the world, and doesn't serve anyone's interests.

      I'm assuming those routers with flaws in implementating the standard fail to work with many other devices too (game consoles, phones, etc.) even if they manage to work with Windows.

      That's the rub. The router I had to replace to satisfy my newest mac worked fine with Windows XP, Vista and 7 (even though Vista and 7 came out after the router firmware), it worked with my Nintendo Wii, Ubuntu, and my wife's blackberry too... but Snow Leopard on the Macbook pro lost connectivity every minute or so... and even the mac worked fine when booted to Win7 in bootcamp.

    51. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      And its utter b.s. for them to simply claim 'its their faulty implementation. we followed the spec perfectly

      It can be a lame excuse, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it utter BS. Both parties (router and Apple) have arguably made a faulty device, and I do think the one not meeting standards is responsible for updating. (if thats really the case, versus ambiguity in the standards)

      But yeah, if the spec is ambiguous or if every other device under the sun seems to work with a router, I'd file that under "Apple should make itself compatible" pretty much regardless. Odds are that incompatibility exists in a lot of other routers too, if no other device have problems with it.

    52. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh sorry, I should have said "the one in charge of the router" instead of "you" - that would make "the one in charge of the router" the asshole.

      But you are of course missing my point: admit that it is Apple's "fault" if everybody else does it wrong - that's all I wanted to hear from you.

    53. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by macs4all · · Score: 1

      It was only until last month I decided to take my Netgear apart, to find there was no third antenna, so I installed a third one. I'm currently on the other side of my house to the router, and enjoying 108Mb/s on my Mac.

      Hmmm. So it seems that the problem:

      1. Wasn't a "firmware" issue.

      2. Was a hardware problem with the router, that the Mac seemed to be less tolerant of (so what?)

      3. Was not a problem with the Mac at all.

    54. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by macs4all · · Score: 1

      In an ideal world sure. In the world in which I live I can update the firmware in my Mac so that it copes with a flawed router at starbucks or my hotel or a clients office, I can't update the firmware at starbucks, the hotel, or a clients office.

      So, just how many different buggy products must Apple provide workarounds for?

      Finally, all this assumes Apple actually followed the standard and its all these vendors with horrific buggy systems. Quite bluntly, Apple is not perfect, and it would be absurd to presume they got everything right, and its all these other vendors who keep getting it wrong. Some of the technical blame lies at apples feet.

      Apple historically has a pretty damn stellar track record as far as implementing standards as written. Please provide a citation that shows that Apple's firmware has actually not implemented WiFi protocols correctly (not just that it won't work with router X).

      And some of the blame that genuinely lies at the feet of other vendors COULD be resolved by Apple if it were so inclined. And it SHOULD take ownership of solving these issues when it can. Customers want laptops that 'just work'; that's what they keep promising.

      Sorry. Programming around other people's inability to implement a standard is a no-win situation. It becomes a never-ending cycle of break/fix/break/fix/break... between the various peripheral manufacturers and Apple.

      And above all, in my experience, a lot of the problems could be resolved within a subset of the standard. Often a standard specifies behavior X, and a device doesn't implement this properly, and windows isn't affected because it never requests behavior X. If that's the case, Apple could make their software work too with all these devices, by simply avoiding feature X. Note that by doing this Apple would STILL be following the standard to the letter.

      I repeat: If the standard specifies that a behavior is allowable, then the onus is not on the person that expected to be able to use that behavior. Oh, and btw, if just one or two (or even 3 or 4) peripheral manufacturers fail to implement the standard, then do you disallow the behavior? So, when does it end?

      Now the problem with 802.11n is unique; in that, products were already on the market with various and sundry attempts to implement a "standard" that really wasn't cooked yet. So, Apple implements the draft standard, then updates it to the final standard; but is everyone else as diligent? How about the users? How many of them even know that you can update the firmware in their WiFi router, let alone know how to do it? And speaking of which, there are LEGIONS of devices out there that simply don't PROVIDE a way for a MAC user to update the firmware in their product. The updaters are nearly ALWAYS Windows-only.

      Of course, the consumer never knows that until long after they've bought the piece of shit. I've been burnt with that a few times, myself. So again, that's Apple's fault?

      Note that people report that, in an environment with Apple (Airport Extreme) WiFi routers, that ALL devices (not just Apple's) work GREAT. So, maybe, just maybe, it IS the third-party routers with their buggy firmware afterall, eh?

      Think about it.

    55. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Apple do seem to have history when it comes to wifi - so I suspect that apple is more at fault here.

      Actually, Apple's "history" when it comes to WiFi is a LOT better than nearly every other device manufacturer.

      Or have you never tried to use a Windows system with WiFi?

    56. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Programming around other people's inability to implement a standard is a no-win situation.

      A laptop that doesn't work well on a significant fraction of the existing wireless hotspots around is a no-win situation too.

      Please provide a citation that shows that Apple's firmware has actually not implemented WiFi protocols correctly (not just that it won't work with router X).

      I'll go one better. I'll provide citations that apple's own routers have had significant firmware bugs:

      http://support.apple.com/kb/DL965
      firmware 7.5.1 fixes:
              * An issue with wireless performance in the 5GHz band
              * An issue with creating a Guest Network in the 5GHz band

      http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3466
      firmware 7.4.1
              * Resolves an issue in which a client computer may be disconnected when waking from sleep
              * Addresses an issue in which redirecting SMTP port services may disable IP-layer networking

      It was really just silly to presume there wouldn't have been issues with networking on macs. And this is mac-to-mac networking, no 3rd parties at all.

      Now the problem with 802.11n is unique...

      So automatically fall back to 802.11g or b gracefully if it can't maintain a reliable connection in n for whatever reason.

      And speaking of which, there are LEGIONS of devices out there that simply don't PROVIDE a way for a MAC user to update the firmware in their product. The updaters are nearly ALWAYS Windows-only.

      Who cares whether I can update it with a mac or not? I can't update them period: because THEY AREN'T MINE.

      People who only own macs and buy 3rd party routers that can't be updated from macs are a very small part of the problem. I'm sure they can find someone with a windows box if they spend 3 minutes trying to find a friend or friends kid with a PC. Absolute worst case they can drag their box into best buy and pay geeksquad to do it for them.

      Note that people report that, in an environment with Apple (Airport Extreme) WiFi routers, that ALL devices (not just Apple's) work GREAT. So, maybe, just maybe, it IS the third-party routers with their buggy firmware afterall, eh?

      There has been a sequence of firmware updates for their Airport extreme wifi routers to fix bugs... you know because not all devices (including Apples) were working great. So, maybe, just maybe, Apple makes buggy software/firmware too, eh?

    57. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      yes I have. I also I did the Cisco wireless certification course(efectivly the Wifi CCNA/CCDA) which is for professionals and in cosiderably more depth. The average wifi user has a vague idea that the wifi faries do it all in the night.

      This isn't the first time that apple have had problems with WiFi.

      though in fairness the wifi spec is a bit roapy in parts which means you do need to do interoperability testing.

    58. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by billcopc · · Score: 1

      As someone who's laid hands on more diverse hardware than all of Dell's assembly techs combined, I stand firm. PC-style hardware is universally sloppy. It is thrown together by the lowest bidder, QA typically consists of a 5-minute "does it boot" test in XP SP2, and driver development is a fire-and-forget task. The fact that anything works with anything else is an everyday miracle.

      What, did you honestly believe your $40 router was lovingly engineered by the brightest minds in the industry ? No, it was prototyped by some kid in Japan, the board laid out by an integration shop in India, and the actual product manufactured by laymen in Malaysia. Anything other chain would drive the costs up tenfold.

      Now, that said, would it have been reasonable for Apple to loosen up the tolerances on their WiFi chipset ? Of course. If they want to play nice with PC hardware, they need to accommodate the entire range of 3rd party gear from best to worst.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    59. Re:Other solutions to the wifi problem by vux984 · · Score: 1

      What, did you honestly believe your $40 router was lovingly engineered by the brightest minds in the industry ? No, it was prototyped by some kid in Japan, the board laid out by an integration shop in India, and the actual product manufactured by laymen in Malaysia. Anything other chain would drive the costs up tenfold.

      You assume too much. I'm sorry to derail your rant, but my last few routers have each cost more than the airport extreme does.

      So what am I supposed to take away from this? That an airport extreme was lovingly sculpted by American engineers ( no actually American designers with engineering degrees) with an HCI team computing just what the diameter of the single indicator led should be, while busy little genius coders fed only the highest quality organic American produce wrote flawless firmware... (numerous firmware updates to fix serious bugs notwithstanding).

      And all that effort still resulted in a box in the same price range as a comparable linksys, dlink, or netgear.

  4. Wi-Fi problems by Pojut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Our neighbor picked up an iPad on launch day, and he has definitely experienced the Wi-Fi problem. His Acer Aspire One in his basement can connect to his wireless G Linksys router on his top floor with a good, strong signal. His iPad can BARELY connect while he is on his ground floor, and in his basement you can forget about it. His Aspire One can also see our wireless network as well as the network belonging to folks on the other side of him, but even if he shoves his iPad against the wall dividing our town homes, he still can't even see our router, much less connect to it.

    1. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Casca · · Score: 5, Funny

      How exactly is this a problem? Just buy an apple airport wireless extender and problem solved.

      --
      Casca
    2. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Anonymusing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah yes, the great Apple solution: buy more stuff from Apple!

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    3. Re:Wi-Fi problems by alphax45 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that you shouldn't have to buy another device so that your iPad works with a router that everything else works with. It really seems like something is wrong with the Wi Fi in the iPad..

      --
      K Man
    4. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL
      just.. LOL

      How is this NOT a problem? Why can't it work like a normal wifi device?

      Only a hardcore apple fanboi could even come up with the logic you displayed.

    5. Re:Wi-Fi problems by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Troll

      > How exactly is this a problem? Just buy an apple airport wireless extender and problem solved.

      The ipad is inferior.

      He is expected by the cult to buy yet some other doo-dad as a kludgey work around to make up for the fact that the ipad is inferior.

      Yes: pisspoor wifi reception is a genuine reason to knock a product.

      Having cart full of kludgeware workaround wigdets is not terribly mobile or convenient.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 0, Troll

      QA: The wireless capabilities seem to be crippled to the point where its only about as useful as a wired device. But we don't have a standard ethernet adapter.

      Jobs: Hmmm. Could this be a problem?

      Muffled Yell from the window: ITS NOT A BUG ITS A FEATURE!

      Jobs: Ballmer is peering in through our windows again. Someone go tell him to get on that Windows 7 SP 2 or it'll never sell.

    7. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And only a AC would not recognize a whoosh moment.

      Um, wait..

    8. Re:Wi-Fi problems by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely true.

      If you take a look at the iPad Teardown, you'll see the WiFi antenna (step 24, bottom), which can only peer out of the Apple logo. There's no use thinking otherwise - it's just that one antenna out the spot in the back. The rest of the case is metal, and the screen probably has a metal backing on it, making the only place for signals to escape is that little patch of plastic.

      I'm surprised you get any signal at all without having to "aim" the back of the iPad at the AP.

    9. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be willing to bet a dumptruck full of Gnutella that the reason why this design decision was made was to maintain the overall look of the device.

      Huzzah for form over function!

    10. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Casca · · Score: 1

      :)

      --
      Casca
    11. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in his basement...

      I take it he is a slashdot regular as well?

    12. Re:Wi-Fi problems by waitwonder · · Score: 1

      Just as Wozniak commented:

      Interviewer: What's your favorite phone?

      Wozniak: The iPhone, because of the apps. By the way, I solved the problem of battery life and [the lack of] multitasking on the iPhone.

      Interviewer: Really?

      Wozniak: Yeah. I just have two iPhones, so if the battery runs down on the first one, I can use the other. And if I'm talking on one, I can use the other one to look something up. You would not believe how much use I get out of that.

    13. Re:Wi-Fi problems by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an iPad and I've been sitting in the opposite corner of my 2,000 sq. foot house, through 6 walls, an elevator shaft, and numerous electronic devices, and have had no problems with wifi whatsoever. In fact, I downloaded 1GB of music and it was fast, easily maxing out my 20 megabit cable Internet connection, while sitting in the opposite corner of the house from my wifi router.

      I'm using an Airport Extreme base station (the original, not improved new version), with WPA2, wireless-N enabled, so YMMV. My anecdotal experience is that the iPad actually got a strong, usable signal, sitting in the same spot of the house where my Windows 7 gaming laptop drops due to a weak signal and too many walls.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    14. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is Gnutella like a free Nutella?

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    15. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that you shouldn't have to buy another device so that your iPad works with a router that everything else works with. It really seems like something is wrong with the Wi Fi in the iPad..

      WHOOSH! (Coincidentally, something you hear a lot at an airport.)

    16. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

      Here is where I pull my hair out discussing the differences between Windows and MAC... Windows 7 (Microsoft) didn't produce the hardware you are running, only the OS. The most likely cause of a poor signal is hardware related which is not 'Windows 7s' fault. At the very least it is a driver issue which again is the fault of the hardware manufacturer, not 'Windows 7'. You can't compare the two this way and it is explanations like this that confuse and misguide people.

      I will also add that Using a Linksys router with 4 year old firmware in a basement (game room) on the other end of the house, my iPhone, iPod touch, Droid Eris, 'Windows XP' laptop and iPad all work without issue.

      --
      ~ Ron Fitzgerald
    17. Re:Wi-Fi problems by reidconti · · Score: 1

      ... except the 3G model will have a plastic patch for the cell radio.

    18. Re:Wi-Fi problems by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      But of course something's wrong with the router: it must be disrupting the Reality Distortion Field!

    19. Re:Wi-Fi problems by blankinthefill · · Score: 1

      This is one case where credit not being passed on might not be such a bad thing...

    20. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Ewann · · Score: 1

      You have an elevator in your house?

    21. Re:Wi-Fi problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the iPhone the only phone that (due to gsm) that lets you multitask while talking on the phone? They've even had commercials bragging about it. Meanwhile any Verizon/CDMA phone is incapable of using (maybe just networked?) apps while talking on the phone.

  5. Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    with a Jailbreak.

    Yours In Kuybyshev,
    Kilgore Trout

    1. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Or just use one of the many Linux tablets soon to appear.

    2. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by slim · · Score: 1

      with a Jailbreak.

      Yay! Give Apple a big chunk of your money, then immediately invalidate the warranty.

    3. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Exactly! These devices have a great potential, but as a Linux fan, I'd love to get a (preferably atom) tablet with a Wacom touchscreen. While I will be using KDE >4.4.0 on the sucker (it needs some processing juice), Xournal and Inkscape will be perfectly epic :) ... and a hell of a lot cheaper ^^,

      --
      Here be signatures
    4. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by 1729 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Soon? My first Linux tablet was in the mid 80s.

      That's impressive. Especially since Linux was created in 1991.

    5. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by copponex · · Score: 0, Troll

      The warranty? You mean the multi-day wait at the "Genius Bar" or the automatic refusal to cover warranty parts because you accidentally used the product for work?

      But hey man, Garage Band clinics are free!

    6. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by godrik · · Score: 2, Funny

      In ten years, linux will have a support for the kernel operation time_travel which allowed someone to bring a penguiny-tablet to 1985. Hence GP's comment!

    7. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      You homo sapiens and your time.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    8. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by aardwolf64 · · Score: 0

      He meant the mid- 2080s. You see, he's sending that post from in the future where Linux rules the world and runs with proper driver support on all devices.

    9. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by Asclepius99 · · Score: 1

      Hot Tub Time Machine?

    10. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      Moses had a Linux Tablet centuries ago.

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    11. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by Wovel · · Score: 1

      But it broke in two.

    12. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by Kenja · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bah, the 8's so close the the 9. I of course meant the 90s. Was a Dauphin 486 tablet.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    13. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have we skipped straight over "The year of the Linux Desktop" and we're now going for "The year of the Linux tablet"?

      2010 will be the year of the Linux Tablet.
      2011 will be the year of the Linux Tablet.
      2012 will be the year of the Linux Tablet.

      Hey kids - you know what 2013 is? That's right, you guessed it! 2013 will definitely be the year of the Linux Tablet. I predict it will run a particularly stunning new version of Ubuntu, which will probably be nicknamed "Zesty Zygote." And I expect it will have the sophisticated charm of a Fisher Price toy as sketched by a mildly retarded child with severe myopia. These are bold predictions. But Linux deserves nothing less!

    14. Re:Free The iPad Of Apple Domination by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      The year of the Linux Phone was last year.

      And if this crazy tablet idea works for Apple, you can bet it will work for Android.

  6. iWork Files are corupted to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The file synch is nothing compared to the way iWork mangles files http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=7935&tag=content;col1

  7. Wait, what? by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    No one's hacked it yet?

    Come on people, get on the ball...

    1. Re:Wait, what? by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      It would be hacked by now if it wasn't for those WiFi problems. Either that or hackers stopped caring about Apple products.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Informative
  8. Document work sounds just awful by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doing anything with documents on an iPad sounds awful. You apparently have to "sync" with a Mac using iTunes. In any business environment, you'd want to talk to some server.

    Apparently the iPad is incompatible with Google Docs, although this may just be a bug.

    1. Re:Document work sounds just awful by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    2. Re:Document work sounds just awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can read but not edit. Bug my ass.

    3. Re:Document work sounds just awful by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Apparently the iPad is incompatible with Google Docs, although this may just be a bug.

      I think Apple would call it a feature...

    4. Re:Document work sounds just awful by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I bought QuickOffice for my iPod Touch just last weekend. I bought the cheap $9.99 version. It connects to my desktop over Wi-Fi through what I think is a pretty neat method. The QuickOffice app runs a small web server. When you enable it, it gives you a URL that you connect to the iPod with any web browser, with an HTML form set up so you can upload or download to the iPod.

      That said, I didn't buy the $14.99 version, which is set up for connecting to Google Docs and the other 'cloud' stuff.

    5. Re:Document work sounds just awful by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. There are numerous wifi transfer apps for the iPad that turn your iPad into a shared hard drive on the network, making it just another networked computer that you can drag and drop files to. Some of them support every protocol imaginable, including WebDAV, Google Docs, and other cloud providers.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    6. Re:Document work sounds just awful by ross.w · · Score: 1

      You have to remember, it's not designed for content creation, it's designed for content consumption. that's why all the magazine publishers are salivating over this hoping to be able to charge for content again and save their outdated business models.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    7. Re:Document work sounds just awful by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Apple should just buy Dropbox and shoot all of it's MobileMe developers. On second thought, let's just keep Dropbox private and still shoot the MobileMe developers.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Document work sounds just awful by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Mobile Safari is missing some features that are useful for a document editor like contentEditable.

  9. No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly is this a problem? Just buy an apple airport wireless extender and problem solved.

    I see. So Apple's wimpy receiver needs a boost and the solution is to buy more hardware from Apple - sound like IBM's business model - it's a good one, btw.

    It's too bad that Apple didn't use the same superior Wi-Fi receivers like those low-end laptops and netbooks.

    1. Re:No problem. by cabjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must not have dealt with IBM in a business setting much. They practically invented vendor lock in.

    2. Re:No problem. by Kitkoan · · Score: 4, Informative

      You cant just buy your own graphics card, more hardware, or even a damn battery for iPhone. You have to buy everything from Apple, from an Apple store, with high Apple prices. This just follows the same lead.

      Buying RAM for a Mac: http://www.newerram.com/

      Buying a new graphics card for a Mac (Mac edition of graphics cards): http://www.nextag.com/mac-graphics-card/compare-html

      Pretty much everything you need to upgrade the hardware of a Mac: http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/site-map/

      These aren't Apple sites, but you can upgrade your Mac with their parts. Just because its harder to do, doesn't mean it can't be done.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    3. Re:No problem. by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except how many Macs these days have user replacable graphics cards for example?

    4. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can upgrade your graphics card...if your Mac isn't more than two years old. I've you have a pre-2008 Mac Pro it will physically support any card out now, but too bad nobody bothers to write the firmware to work with it. If you have a Mac Pro that's really not that old, you have to use hacked firmware to upgrade your video card to anything recent.

    5. Re:No problem. by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Giving the "no true Scotsman" line a run, eh?

      Good trolling there.

    6. Re:No problem. by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is such a tired, untrue, cliched argument. Granted, you can't easily go to Best Buy and purchase a battery for the iPhone, but I assure you I can find one online in about 1 minute.

      Apple doesn't even make graphic cards, so yes, you actually can go buy a third party graphic card and put it in a Mac (granted, only the Pro is expandable these days, but my G4 has had all kinds of 3rd party stuff inside).

      "More hardware"? What does that mean? I've purchased all kinds of non-Apple hardware over the years: USB and wireless mice, keyboards, hard drives, wireless routers, wireless USB adapters, USB hubs, monitors, printers, and so on.

      The only Apple hardware I own other than the computers is Airport Extreme and a video adapter. Yeah, the Extreme costs $100 more than some random junk at Best Buy, but Time Machine worked instantly out-of-the-box, which was well worth the extra $100 I spent.

      Next argument.

    7. Re:No problem. by TyFoN · · Score: 1

      More hardware usually refer to stuff like raid cards, sound cards, gfx cards etc.
      As in, you can't just go and buy a high-end sound card like Asus Xonar D2X or a graphics card like GeForce 295 (not that the mac supports multi gpu anyway) and expect it to work in the mac.
      And the only mac to support add-in cards at all is the mac pro.

    8. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree, just because it is harder, and less functional, doesn't mean you shouldn't pay more to try to.

    9. Re:No problem. by BlueWaterBaboonFarm · · Score: 1

      ... Yeah, the Extreme costs $100 more than some random junk at Best Buy, but Time Machine worked instantly out-of-the-box, which was well worth the extra $100 I spent.

      Next argument.

      Wait, Apple almost beats the insanely good deals that can be found and Best Buy? I guess newegg and and ncix are gonna go bankrupt pretty soon.

    10. Re:No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The whole industry is moving towards integrated graphics for low end desktops and power efficient notebooks. Of the five macs apple sells, three of them have user upgradable graphics. The other two use integrated graphics for cost and power savings (in fact, apple's high end notebook has *two* graphics cards, one is user upgradable, the other is not. The user can choose the integrated gfx card to add significant battery life).

      It's not just apple following this trend, everyone is doing it.

    11. Re:No problem. by kainewynd2 · · Score: 1

      Good point; only the Mac Pros and Xserves (yes, the Xserves).

      --
      I just don't get... eh, ugh... never mind. This post wasn't worth the research I put into it.
    12. Re:No problem. by billcopc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only reason it's "harder to do" is because Macs don't really advertise their internal specs. When you buy a PC, they go around boasting "DDR3 this, Quickpath that". PC marketing is atrocious, but at least you have a list of jargon that says what's inside the plastic box.

      It certainly doesn't help that Apple often revises the hardware without changing the name. They've been selling Mac Pros for nearly four years, but the earliest ones were Socket 771 with DDR2 FB-DIMM memory, while current models are Socket 1366 with DDR3 ECC Unbuffered memory. To many Mac users, these models are referred as "the fast Mac Pro" and "the faster Mac Pro". As a non-Apple tech, you really have to crack the thing open to figure out what goes in it.

      In the end, once you know which parts will fit, it's just a computer like any other. This is also true of their consumer devices... so what if Apple doesn't sell a battery for your iPhone ? Check a message board, you'll find a bunch of unreputable accessory manufacturers in Asia selling replacement parts. You might have to work a bit harder to install them yourself, or find a local geek to do it for you, but the gear is out there. Up where I live, we have these repugnant little shops that sell all manner of junk like XS Cargo, Factory Direct, and surely others : refurbished and unlocked cell phones, no-name gadgets, gaming accessories... it's like a pawn shop minus all the bad 80's cassettes and unloved guitars. Those guys tend to have all the gray-market modding and repair stuff you could ever want, and they often have an EE flunkie on-site to do the labor rather cheaply. The stuff Apple won't do, those sketchy guys will happily do for a few bucks - that's their business model.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    13. Re:No problem. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      And you can buy all of the pieces for a Mac at Newegg jus tlike most /.s would for a PC.

    14. Re:No problem. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      All of the Mac Pros, the only model with the form factor that supports a replaceable graphics card?

    15. Re:No problem. by kaka.mala.vachva · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. You can't argue with this sort of logic - its worth the $100 more because it worked instantly out of the box. Most PC hardware does work out of the box, even with Linux nowadays, and I don't have to shell out a premium for it. Saying its worth the extra money because it works out of the box is a rubbish argument.

    16. Re:No problem. by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      And the cheapest Mac Pro is $2,500.

    17. Re:No problem. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How many PCs in typical Mac form factors have replaceable video cards? Precious few, that's how many. Even where you have an MXM slot in a notebook, most of the time the cooling arrangements are enough to prevent swapping a substantially different card; netbooks and nettops universally lack replaceable video cards, though some do have more upgradability than a Mini. The Macs which come in form factors which in PCs typically have replaceable video cards do in fact typically have them also.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:No problem. by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      The latest generation of iMacs have removable graphics cards.

      http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iMac-Intel-27-Inch-Teardown/1236/3#s6693

    19. Re:No problem. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      You are right, you can't argue with my logic because there's nothing to argue about. It's my money, and it's my time. If I think unboxing a router, plugging it into the wall, plugging it into the modem, and then clicking through a couple screens is worth $100 to me, then it is worth $100...TO ME.

    20. Re:No problem. by harl · · Score: 1

      This is the core of the matter. I became interested in getting a Mac when Apple stopped writing OSes and started using UNIX but every time I revisit buying one I always get stuck on the same problem.

      I simply can't get past the fact that for the same money I can buy more boxen with better hardware for less money.

      I just can't subscribe to this idea that computers are a lifestyle choice that defines me. They're tools. You can get a better tool for less money.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    21. Re:No problem. by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      How many laptops have user replaceable graphics cards? After all, the Mac Mini and the iMac are basically laptops in elaborate cases.

    22. Re:No problem. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The only reason it's "harder to do" is because Macs don't really advertise their internal specs.

      OTOH, try to find the actual tech specs of a computer on HP.com, dell.com or lenovo.com - then try on apple.com Heck, on the Dell site I once found two (slightly) different specs for the same computer when going a different path.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  10. Why did they not wait for 4.0? by CompressedAir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It sure seems strange to me that Apple, who sell themselves as the "complete" and "it just works" experience would release the iPad before the next version of iPhoneOS comes out. This sounds like the kind of giant pay-to-beta-test sort of thing that Apple is known for NOT doing.

    As someone who uses an iPhone and would like an iPad, Thursday will be very interesting.

    Is anyone else reminded of the 10.0 release of OSX?

    1. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      This sounds like the kind of giant pay-to-beta-test sort of thing that Apple is known for NOT doing.

      I HOPE this was meant as sarcasm...

    2. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by CompressedAir · · Score: 1

      No, not sarcasm. What examples are you thinking of?

    3. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      This sounds like the kind of giant pay-to-beta-test sort of thing that Apple is known for NOT doing

      Actually this is par for the course. iPhone 1.0, OSX 10.0, iPod 1.0, etc. They all were beta sold as release.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    4. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It sure seems strange to me that Apple, who sell themselves as the "complete" and "it just works" experience would release the iPad before the next version of iPhoneOS comes out. This sounds like the kind of giant pay-to-beta-test sort of thing that Apple is known for NOT doing.

      Think about that. Apple released a new product on an older but proven OS. iPhone OS 3.2 is a version of iPhone OS specifically modified for iPad. It was released in beta back in Jan 2010. You're advocating that they should have released a brand new product on a new, unproven OS (4.0 which hasn't been released outside of Apple yet). Sounds like Apple is trying to avoid the beta-testing you're accusing them of doing.

      Also this week they will announce/release the beta version of 4.0 to developers. It will be at least a few months after release before the OS moves from beta to final. That would have to delay the launch of iPad for a few more months.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Didn't the iPhone have reception issues?

      I believe it had an entirely metal case that interfered with the antenna. This sounds a lot like something Apple would do.

      Also, have you used OSX prior to 10.2? it was full of stupid little annoyances.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else reminded of the 10.0 release of OSX?

      That's a little harsh.

    7. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, duh, the new iPhone is just an iPad with phone functionality. And who would have bought an iPad if they'd known they could get exactly the same thing, plus a phone?

      And it will sell like hotcakes. With that 24oz bad boy held up to your ear, everyone will know just how cool you are.

    8. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      It sure seems strange to me that Apple, who sell themselves as the "complete" and "it just works" experience would release the iPad before the next version of iPhoneOS comes out.

      Its actually really not that strange that Apple, or any other company, would do something substantive that is at odds with its carefully constructed PR image.

      Of course, their PR folks will be working overtime to make sure that this is forgotten as soon as possible, because that's what a carefully constructed PR image is all about -- working hard to make people see the things that are consistent with it, and forget those that aren't.

    9. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by Altus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus this will give them a chance to see what other things might be missing from the iPad OS and fix those issues in version 4.0 of the OS.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    10. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by CompressedAir · · Score: 1

      Heh, well said.

    11. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This gives them time to patch all the holes in 4.0 before final release and pass on those to all ipads locking them back down.

    12. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by mini+me · · Score: 1

      The aluminum Powerbooks had this problem. They later moved the antenna for the Macbook Pros.

    13. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by tresstatus · · Score: 1

      No, not sarcasm. What examples are you thinking of?

      if you PAY for a developer acct, you get access to the beta versions of the iphone OS early.

      --
      stephen
    14. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      iPhone 1.0 was pretty much a beta test...

    15. Re:Why did they not wait for 4.0? by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      I thought most of their PR people were posting on this thread as a means of damage control.

  11. Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't it "just work"

  12. Arbitrary eBook reading? by ShadyG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm really interested to know is will the iPad allow me to write a book, save in unencrypted ePub format, and upload it to my own device, to be read by iBooks? I happen to be in the market for an e-reader, but not one that won't allow me to read self-authored content.

    1. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang on a second there sparky. You want to write a book on the ipad? You do realize you'll be typing thousands of characters on a glass screen right? Just because you can do something doesn't mean it's a good idea.

    2. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by Shadis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, yes you can. Check out the section of the IPad user guide for ibooks ( http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iPad_User_Guide.pdf ). You can import any non-DRM epub formatted file into ITunes and then Sync that with the ipad.

    3. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by joh · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I'm really interested to know is will the iPad allow me to write a book, save in unencrypted ePub format, and upload it to my own device, to be read by iBooks?

      Yes. Drag your ePub file into iTunes, sync with the iPad, done. Or publish your book via smashwords (free), get it into the iBooks store this way and install it right from the iPad ;-)

    4. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by SidIncognito · · Score: 1

      I've tried this and it works well. I have a bunch of plaintext files (that I typically convert to PDF using LaTeX). I pasted the text into some XHTML files, created an ePub by hand, and imported it to iTunes. It synced just fine to the iPad and looks very nice in iBooks.

      I'm now working on putting together a little Perl script to automate this so I can generate an ePub every time I generate the PDF.

    5. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe Pages will save to ePub, but iBooks can read third-party non-DRM ePub files. So, you can always type it up as a Pages file, export it to your computer as a Doc, and use some other program to convert it to ePub, and then move it back to your iPad, but ugh.

      As for getting your book onto the iBookstore for others to buy, currently only Amazon allows individuals to self-publish ebooks for their store.

      However, you can publish with SmashWords, who offers none of the editing/marketing assistance of a big publishing house, but they have negotiated publishing agreements with the big ebook vendors. Just upload your work, and they will in turn publish your book on iBooks, Amazon, B&N, Sony, and Kobo, or any subset thereof, in return for a cut of your cut. (http://www.smashwords.com/)

    6. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What kind of pinko communist are you? Writing your own content is communist, and no better than stealing from all the people working hard to provide you good corporate-produced content.

    7. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I got the impression from his post that he wanted to write it on a computer, save it to ePub, *then* upload it to his iPad.

    8. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by mini+me · · Score: 1

      You can add a bluetooth external keyboard.

    9. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by anarche · · Score: 1

      Last time I saved my book at ePub, i wound up with my eGoogles on and woke up married to my Wifi.

      She forced me to get a job and the publishan stole my iDea and printed it...

      --
      Wait! Whats a sig?
    10. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the Entourage Edge. www.entourageedge.com My preorder arrived last week and it's been pretty hot. Android-based tablet/ebook reader.

    11. Re:Arbitrary eBook reading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'm really interested to know is will the iPad allow me to write a book, save in unencrypted ePub format, and upload it to my own device, to be read by iBooks? I happen to be in the market for an e-reader, but not one that won't allow me to read self-authored content.

      Really? Google Calibre. It will convert anything to ePub format and it's open source. I have been a happy user for a while now on 3 different e-book readers.

  13. On the 2.5 YO by Swanktastic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The little girl had obviously spent a lot of time playing with an iPhone or iPod Touch. While cute, I don't think it really qualifies as much of a First-Encounter-type UI experiment.

    1. Re:On the 2.5 YO by alen · · Score: 2, Informative

      my son is the same age and he can get around my iphone pretty well. i have 2 pages of apps just for him. i've noticed that if i change their position or the page they are on, he can still find the app he's looking for. his current favorite is a Thomas the Train puzzle game.

      and thanks to video download helper on firefox, i can download train videos for him from youtube. and sometimes he just likes to explore, try playing the music i have, change the position of my apps, etc

    2. Re:On the 2.5 YO by stimpleton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is slashdot so you are forgiven....so I'll paste the first sentence for you:

      "My iPhone-savvy 2.5 year-old daughter held an iPad for the very first time last night, and it turned out to be an interesting user-interface experiment."

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    3. Re:On the 2.5 YO by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      UI aren't really that hard to use though. Click and touch. Hell I was pretty good using a Macintosh with Apple OS version 1 at 3 and a half years old in 1984. Thats why companies make UI's instead of stuff like DOS. Because they are easy to use.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    4. Re:On the 2.5 YO by h4rr4r · · Score: 0, Troll

      This proves it, the anticipated user IQ is right around that of a 30month old child.

    5. Re:On the 2.5 YO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP said the little girl had used the iPhone/iPod Touch interface before, not the iPad interface. There's nothing in the sentence you pasted that contradicts that.

    6. Re:On the 2.5 YO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the 1st comment:
      "This is amazing! When my mother first saw the iPad she immediately thought of my youngest brother who is developmentally disabled".

    7. Re:On the 2.5 YO by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      He also said "While cute, I don't think it really qualifies as much of a First-Encounter-type UI experiment." That's the bit that was contradicted: no one claimed that it did.

  14. Probably not 300k by Luthair · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to PCWorld, the Apple press release citing 300k units is including those sold to Bestbuy, which is of course entirely different from the number of units sold by Bestbuy.

    1. Re:Probably not 300k by ProppaT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not really bothered by the 300k number. I'm sure there's nearly that many Apple zealots waiting to get their hands on one to begin with. What I'm curious about is how many of those 300k people are people who are just going to buy the next Apple gadget on launch day vs. those who bought it out of genuine interest. Also, I'm curious if this will drive up the sales of iPod Touches when people go out to get an iPad but realize they can save a few hundred dollars and basically have the same functionality + portability. Personally, I hope it flops...we don't need Apple dictating, shaping, and propriatizing yet another format...but that's just an off topic rant.

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    2. Re:Probably not 300k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also doesn't include the 3G iPads that have been pre-ordered (but won't ship until the end of April) and also the WiFi-only iPads that have yet to ship (the original orders arrived April 3rd and after a certain point, the online orders had a ship date of April 12th).

    3. Re:Probably not 300k by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      I was at the Palo Alto store at 6am. I wanted to get hands on an actual device for our app, which was going on sale by the grand opening. Surely enough, about 1/3 of the people in line were other developers in the same situation, and another 1/3 were marketing consultants doing the rounds for attention and clients. I bet the number of typical Apple fans was higher in other stores, though.

    4. Re:Probably not 300k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude your waiting at a store at 6am for the device, you are not just a developer, you are a zealot. I am a developer as is the company I work for, we expect to grab a few next week for testing. Once you decide to queue up in your own time before the store is even open you need to slap yourself in the face and realise you have gone past just being a developer.

    5. Re:Probably not 300k by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1
      I thought about getting an iPod Touch, then I heard the iPad was coming out, so I decided it would be a better device for me. I wont buy one until the next gen comes out, but I am wondering if the iPad will cause Amazon to cut the price of Kindle. If a Kindle was $100, I might be interested, but both the iPad and Kindle are too high priced for me at this time. A reasonably priced iPad that runs Kindle software would be of considerable interest.

      Of course I would also like to see a USB port on the iPad - I don't want to be constrained by Apple with regard to files.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    6. Re:Probably not 300k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious about is how many of those 300k people are people who are just going to buy the next Apple gadget on launch day vs. those who bought it out of genuine interest.

      False dichotomy much?

      I know Slashdotters believe passionately in the brainwashed-zombie Apple customer who buys anything Steve Jobs points at, but isn't it possible that Apple's engenders genuine interest in its products?

      Also, I'm curious if this will drive up the sales of iPod Touches when people go out to get an iPad but realize they can save a few hundred dollars and basically have the same functionality + portability

      Yeah, or a Netbook, for that matter. Heck, when will those brainwashed zombie Mac owners realize that the can check email and Facebook on a $500 PC instead of a $1200 iMac? Losers...

      Personally, I hope it flops...we don't need Apple dictating, shaping, and propriatizing yet another format...but that's just an off topic rant.

      No, it's quite a revealing rant.

    7. Re:Probably not 300k by Altus · · Score: 1

      Maybe he is the head of engineering at a small tech firm. Sometimes people at startups have to do things themselves that are done by a procurement department in larger companies.

      Still, I do think it was odd that I didn't hear about any way for developers to get their hands on them a day or 2 early for testing. Not that I keep up with the Apple developer connection.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    8. Re:Probably not 300k by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I bought my first 'new retail' Apple product about a month ago. An iPod Touch. It's nice, though there are constraints. I find most of what I want to use with it for free in the Apps Store, and it's got new enough firmware that it's not jailbreakable yet. The multimeda features are integrated enough that I can use it as a carry-around here at home to listen to Web Radio with no additional apps needed, though there are hucksters in the App Store ready to provide fancy apps to make it, supposedly, easier. Last night I walked out to the backyard and the only interruption to my web radio listening was when my access point connection dropped out and I had to reconnect to the neighbor's instead. I probably can set it up to automatically roam to theirs if I want, somehow.

    9. Re:Probably not 300k by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      I'm one of 3 in a pretty informal project with friends. We woke up, got some coffee, got in line and spent time chatting with a bunch of interesting people, some of them useful connections for the future. All in all, it was time well spent, fun and productive. Sure, I could have waited till the afternoon, but if your first developed app was going live and you hadn't seen it on the device, you would probably be excited to try it out ASAP.

    10. Re:Probably not 300k by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      Pretty close. We don't even qualify as startup, just a bunch of friends with hopes and some spare time. I believe some major developers had access to the machines a few days before, but not us the little guys.

    11. Re:Probably not 300k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, or a Netbook, for that matter. Heck, when will those brainwashed zombie Mac owners realize that the can check email and Facebook on a $500 PC instead of a $1200 iMac? Losers...

      Losers? Or maybe just people with different views? I've got a friend who recently purchased an iMac. His reason? To avoid viruses. Considering he's got a couple of teens I'm not surprised.

      Also a $500 PC is not going to perform anywhere near as close as a $1200 iMac. Even if you build it yourself you won't probably manage the same level of quality. You certainly won't be getting a 21.5-inch screen capable of 1920 by 1080 in the mix. A quick check at HP's offers shows their sub $500 PC is still using a single-core processor.

      I tried customizing one of HP's all-in-one systems. If it wasn't for the free addons they gave you would end up spending more for an HP than for an iMac.

    12. Re:Probably not 300k by indiechild · · Score: 1

      What format exactly are you referring to? ePub?

    13. Re:Probably not 300k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many of them would buy without the millions of dollars of free advertising apple receive under the guise of 'journalism'?

    14. Re:Probably not 300k by node+3 · · Score: 1

      What I'm curious about is how many of those 300k people are people who are just going to buy the next Apple gadget on launch day vs. those who bought it out of genuine interest.

      What makes you think that people buying Apple products on launch day aren't genuinely interested in them? It's actually a rather absurd stance you are taking by implying people would buy the iPad without actually wanting one.

      Also, I'm curious if this will drive up the sales of iPod Touches when people go out to get an iPad but realize they can save a few hundred dollars and basically have the same functionality + portability.

      No, the iPod touch is not equivalent to the iPad. Someone else made the point that the iPad is no more simply a big iPod than a swimming pool is just a large bathtub.

      The iPad is a device unique unto itself. It's not a MacBook replacement, nor is it an iPod or iPhone replacement.

      we don't need Apple dictating, shaping, and propriatizing yet another format...

      What are you talking about?

    15. Re:Probably not 300k by harl · · Score: 1

      The nytimes article clearly states in the first line that the 300K number includes preorders.

      So they shipped 300K on the first day. They took months to sell 300K.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    16. Re:Probably not 300k by harl · · Score: 1

      The article states on the first line that the 300K number includes preorders. So in reality it took them months to sell 300K.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
  15. Re:they didnt "sell" 300K by microcars · · Score: 1

    that figure includes those that WorstBuy bought and has sitting on their shelves. Are they sold to end losers yet?

    look on Craigslist or eBay to see all the "end losers" that bought them thinking they could flip them.
    I wonder what percentage of sales were made up by those?

    --
    I like microcars
  16. The Real test. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Is after 1 month after purchase. When the Gee Wiz is out... The back has a few scratches... Do they put it on a shelf and forget about it or will they use it in their daily lives. I remember back in the 90's when I got myself a Palm III I when I first go it I was playing with it and it was all cool and I downloaded apps for it and everything else... But after a month I kept on forgetting to use it, leaving it at home and not really using it for anything useful. I didn't get myself an iPad not because I didn't think it was cool but because as far as I could tell it would just be fun for a month then I would have it on a shelf not used.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:The Real test. by Pojut · · Score: 1

      For myself, getting a Palm Pilot (m100, represent!) in high school was a freakin' life saver. My hand writing has always been horrible, and the easy-to-learn recognition alphabet it used made my note taking actually worth while.

      I know a lot of people that got PDAs that didn't really use them for much, but note taking and keeping track of my homework alone made mine indispensable for me.

    2. Re:The Real test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Error in your .sig: terminating parenthesis expected.

      eg. DoItFaster(DoWhatIWant()>

    3. Re:The Real test. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If you’d just do what he wants, you wouldn’t be standing here complaining about terminating parentheses.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:The Real test. by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, yes I remember the old Pilot 1000 days, and later the m100 and Treo 600 series. They did so much so well for such a long time. Their attention to usability was spot-on... it was the later years where they seemed to have the same old products without real improvements that made me switch to an iPod Touch, and later an iPhone.

      I wish Palm had the heart to keep up the good fight, but lately it doesn't seem to be there. We need multiple companies constantly stirring the pot to keep ideas flowing. We all benefit from real competition.

    5. Re:The Real test. by citylivin · · Score: 1

      The palm had starcharts based on long/lat and tetris, probably pirated but still, chicks LOVE tetris! It was a hit at many parties in my late high school years.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  17. Re:they didnt "sell" 300K by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Well, considering Apple stopped taking advanced orders, those who wanted one but didn't pre-order would have to get one at an Apple store. If the Apple store was out, they'd have to hope BestBuy had one. BestBuy however carried far fewer per store than an Apple store would have.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  18. Why buy this junk? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Before I become modded down to an oblivion, I would like to point out that on an Asus AEEE or even on a XO I can run abiword or openoffice and have a FULL OS with REAL software that is used by the rest of the world on desktops. Not a DRMed cell phone os with large amounts of resources being used to lock me into a jail with specifically designed office apps that have been made crippled.

    I was hoping to run MacOSX when I heard Apple was going to make a sub netbook. Instead it reminds me of WinCE where Microsoft got together to purposedly cripple as much possible.

    The tabled is not a computer but a device ... a big IPhone with the phone part disabled.

    I am waiting for HPs tablet. I hope it runs Windows and I can put any app I want on it.

    1. Re:Why buy this junk? by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, actually, I do want a device and not yet another computer. Why? Well, less maintenance for one. Also, being instant on is nice (on computers you just don't get a weeks worth of standby on a battery). And without a keyboard, it is a better ereader. I like the whole concept.

      You make it sound like a bad thing that Apple didn't come out with another netbook like the rest. I understand the desire for something cheaper than their current models, but I have to think the whole anticipation of Apple slaughtering it's own higher-end models in the race towards the bottom was naive. Plus there are plenty of subnotebooks (not netbooks, but close) which you can turn into a hackintosh. Otherwise Apple's 13" has to do.

      This doesn't excuse the design flaws of the current iPad. I'll wait till the second or third generation myself.

    2. Re:Why buy this junk? by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Maintenance? What "maintenance"?

      If not for the fact that my Macs like to restart for system updates, I would never need to know they happen.

      A proper OS doesn't need constant babying. The same principles that apply to the iphones in this regard also apply to any general purpose machine.

      Another case of: "must denigrate the mac in order to elevate the ipad".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Why buy this junk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am waiting for HPs tablet. I hope it runs Windows and I can put any app I want on it.

      Riiiight ... Because Microsoft is sooo well regarded for having everything working perfectly in their 1.0 versions of anything they do, from day zero!

      I understand you might not like iPads, I even understand you are willing to put with the crap that is Abiword in *any* environment in exchange for not having to pay for proper software, but citing OO in a netbook (it's barely usable in a full laptop) or pining your hopes on, of all combinations, Windows and HP, it's really sinking very low to try to make (fake?) a point.

      Nah, I already have hardware more than good enough to do everything an HP tablet could do, no waiting, no hoping on vapor-features, no Windows. I'd rather get me a virus-free platform available NOW that offers me things I don't have already (24/7 access to my entire collection of music, books and games in an unbeatable form factor).

    4. Re:Why buy this junk? by harl · · Score: 1

      Maintenance? What maintenance are you doing?

      I don't want to sound all uphill both ways in the snow but personal computers don't require maintenance any more. They just work. The says of editing your boot files to squeak out that last couple K so the memory resident portion of your new program has space to run are long gone.

      Short of a major OS update every year or so what maintenance is there?

      How much time and effort is involved in having to synch up your device since it's not a computer and can't do everything?

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
  19. Poor wifi isn't the only major issue. by bmecoli · · Score: 0

    Apparently, the iPads have a tendency to easily overheat in the sun.

  20. man'kind' progress report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're dropping 'features' at an alarming rate. we've never been very user friendly. we are definitely now peddling ourselves under the hypenosys lowgo. isn't 'progress' grand?

    never a better time to consult with/trust in your creators.

    1. Re:man'kind' progress report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story bro

  21. Sp..... by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    Adopters. Early Adapters? WTF??

    1. Re:Sp..... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Abviously it is an Opple early Adaptor.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  22. strange brew that's also good for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be Kombucha.

  23. Wait for Service Pack 1 by Animats · · Score: 1

    This is looking like a "wait for Service Pack 1" or "wait for version 2" situation.

    This could be a nice little device in a year, when the software is debugged, the cellular interface is in and works, the cellular networks have provisioned enough capacity to serve video to the thing, there's decent support for business documents, and the price has dropped by 50% or so.

  24. Wait for the 2nd gen... by benwiggy · · Score: 1

    Apple make a great product. But never first time round. If I did want one of these, I would wait for the next revision at least.

    1. Re:Wait for the 2nd gen... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, definitely; I kind of have been thinking of getting an ipad but I'm not going for it at LEAST until the second revision.

    2. Re:Wait for the 2nd gen... by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      An example, please? You must be thinking of Windows releases and Service Packs.

      I bought the 1.0 version of the iPod shuffle and it was indeed my gateway drug into more iPods.

    3. Re:Wait for the 2nd gen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X initial release?

  25. First of all... by Azureflare · · Score: 1

    I did buy an iPad. I had a gift certificate so the cost was significantly reduced, and I thought it would be fun. haven't had much time to play with it since work has been crazy since I bought it.

    BUT it is a really nice media consumption device. I haven't bought the iWork suite yet (and i'm not sure I will).

    It seems to me that using this device for creating word documents is not really that a good idea; it reminds me of the monty python skit where they ask someone to cut down a tree with a herring.

    Personally I word process on my desktop when I have REAL work to do. If I want to write leisurely I could see that working on the iPad, but it's definitely not what I envision myself doing.

    I'm going to be reading, watching movies, listening to music and playing games. It does those all pretty well IMO, and the OLED screen is gorgeous indoors (kind of reflective outside). Still wish it had a pixelqi screen but, ah well. Such is the fate of an early adopter.

    1. Re:First of all... by exomondo · · Score: 1

      and the OLED screen is gorgeous indoors (kind of reflective outside). Still wish it had a pixelqi screen but, ah well. Such is the fate of an early adopter.

      What OLED display? I wasn't aware it had one, AFAIK it has a backlit LCD.

  26. My rant by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

    Are developers out of their freaking minds? Do they seriously thing that Things is worth paying $19.99? I mean, I can see the utility, but given all the alternatives, do they seriously believe that people are going to pay that much?

    1. Re:My rant by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would pay $19.99 for it.

      Not a whole lot more than that, though... my current laptop services me fine and doesn’t impose as many silly rules about what I can and can’t install on it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:My rant by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      I guess they must have done their market research, also accounting for the initial excitement of new buyers. But if you see their reviews, most of them complain about the price, and I agree. I guess it's overall a good thing that the can pull it. It leaves some room for the rest of us to undercut them.

    3. Re:My rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clone you sit around here all day and night on this website and obviously do not have a job. How are you going to afford that $19.99 if you don't even have it?

  27. Coming in iPhone OS 5.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Next year Apple will announce iPhone OS 5.0 with an innovative new idea that they're calling "iFile". With this new service all of your applications can share documents by storing them in a common location. iFile will include an innovative system of organization called "Folders". Folders will allow you to group related documents together in a single location. You will even be able to create Folders within Folders.

    And coming in iPhone OS 6.0, "iFile Share". Share your iFiles over any network connection.

    1. Re:Coming in iPhone OS 5.0... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      They're just waiting for their next invitation to visit Xerox PARC. Shortly thereafter they'll come out with that stuff you mentioned.

    2. Re:Coming in iPhone OS 5.0... by selven · · Score: 1

      And in version 7 they'll implement ls.

      And they'patent it.

    3. Re:Coming in iPhone OS 5.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next year Apple will announce iPhone OS 5.0 with an innovative new idea that they're calling "iFile". With this new service all of your applications can share documents by storing them in a common location. iFile will include an innovative system of organization called "Folders". Folders will allow you to group related documents together in a single location. You will even be able to create Folders within Folders.

      In the meantime, Microsoft has announced further UI simplifications in Windows Phone, for the sake of more streamlined user experience.

      The announcement comes in the vein of restrictions in Windows Phone 7 Series, where copy/paste and multitasking were removed altogether, and file access was limited to a self-contained sandbox per application with no ability to have local files shared between several applications.

      (I wish this part was only a joke. Sadly, it's not.)

      Apparently, to even further reduce the strain on user's brain, Windows Phone 8 will just display a picture of Hitler immediately upon boot. "We have performed extensive usability studies", explained the Microsoft product manager, "and users have shown a strong preference for the new approach."

  28. Sucks outside in bright light by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    especially sunlight. Sorry but with this type of device I was really hoping I could use it outdoors without fearing the light. No go. Sorry its abysmal. It also has the problem of not being viewable in page format with polarized lenses, landscape was fine. When I borrowed my friends Kindle I found I could read outside just fine. Let alone the weight, sorry but it really amazes me how much it gets to you over time.

    I don't need another device that is trapped indoors. Summer is almost upon us and I don't want something I fear leaving in the sun, let alone using with the sun out. I guess I can sit under the umbrella but really, my marine GPS is beautiful in sunlight, why can't we have an iPad for the outdoors instead of basement dwellers?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      The reason the iPad looks so poor outdoors is because it uses your typical LCD screen. The Kindle, on the other hand, uses the e-ink screens which have a much higher contrast ratio (and, I have noticed, reduce glare) which makes it much easier to view them. Of course, the Kindle's screen gives up a lot as well, so there is a bit of a trade-off depending on what you're looking for.

    2. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by mortonda · · Score: 1

      How'd that kindle do outside at night?

    3. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you can use it somewhere besides when sipping skim soy lattes at starbucks?

    4. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by neurocutie · · Score: 1

      perfectly well, for DAYS, under a reading lamp that you would normally use to read a magazine or book, which is the paradigm the Kindle fits into...

    5. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by node+3 · · Score: 1, Informative

      The reason the iPad looks so poor outdoors is because it uses your typical LCD screen.

      No it doesn't. It has an LED backlit IPS display. LED is becoming a bit more common these days, but IPS is still quite rare. The iPad's LCD is anything but typical.

      The Kindle, on the other hand, uses the e-ink screens which have a much higher contrast ratio

      Are you kidding? The Kindle has a dark grey font on a light grey background. The iPad's display has much greater contrast.

    6. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by aloktherocker · · Score: 1

      Just wait for the notion ink's adam tablet. It works perfectly even in the brightest sunlight.

    7. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Kindle, on the other hand, uses the e-ink screens which have a much higher contrast ratio

      Are you kidding? The Kindle has a dark grey font on a light grey background. The iPad's display has much greater contrast.

      No he is not kidding. In the sun, the Kindle still has the 1:8 contrast ratio of a newspaper, whereas the iPad's contrast falls from 1:100 (?) to something close to zero (even apart from the glare problems of the shiny glossy screen). Don't take my word for it, go on Youtube and search for a comparison.

    8. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Whatever. IPS makes it a typical high quality display -- though it would have been almost scandalous to use a TN panel in the iPad. Having high quality panels in a mobile device is sort of rare, but IPS and other high quality displays are far from rare in "real" display devices; I'm looking at two. The main advantage of LED lighting seems to be the lower power draw, I haven't really found any evidence that it's higher quality (really high end displays mostly still use CCFL) or longer life (other things tend to break before the backlighting). So in most contexts and particularly in the context of visual quality in direct sunlight, the iPad's display can accurately be described as a typical LCD. Untypical displays include eInk and the Nexus One's OLED display; though I'm not sure how well OLED does in bright sunlight and it certainly has it's own downsides.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by node+3 · · Score: 1

      No he is not kidding. In the sun, the Kindle still has the 1:8 contrast ratio of a newspaper, whereas the iPad's contrast falls from 1:100 (?) to something close to zero (even apart from the glare problems of the shiny glossy screen). Don't take my word for it, go on Youtube and search for a comparison.

      You're full of shit. The iPad's screen is not 1:100 indoors, and does not get "close to zero" in direct sunlight. I have an iPad and I *have* tested this myself, and iBooks is perfectly readable in full sunlight.

      And, just to see what you were talking about, I *DID* do a YouTube search, and found the first video I could find showing iBooks on a sunny beach, and it perfectly matches my own experience.

    10. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Having high quality panels in a mobile device is sort of rare, but IPS and other high quality displays are far from rare in "real" display devices; I'm looking at two.

      Let's say I offered to pay you $10 for every IPS display in existence, the only condition being that you had to pay me $1 for every non-IPS LCD in existence. We'll limit this to any currently existing time frame of your choosing. The last 10 years. The last year. Yesterday. Your choice.

      Who do you think will come out ahead? What makes you think such a disparity qualifies IPS as "typical"?

      The main advantage of LED lighting seems to be the lower power draw

      Which translates to brighter while still offering superior battery life. Brighter means more viewable outdoors.

      I haven't really found any evidence that it's higher quality (really high end displays mostly still use CCFL) or longer life (other things tend to break before the backlighting

      The most common failure in CCFL LCDs is the backlight system. Additionally, LED displays are thinner, lighter, and are instant-on at full brightness.

    11. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by moonbender · · Score: 1

      You're still missing the point. The typical display these days is an LCD (any kind of LCD). Compared to things like eInk or OLEDs, which have totally different viewing characteristics, any kind of LCD is typical. To make a trite car analogy, when somebody is asking you whether you drove to Kentucket in a solar car or a rocket propelled one, you might answer that you drove in a typical car, even if it's a Delorean.

      And while TN is more frequent (possibly more than 10x more frequent these days), it's not like IPS is some kind of groundbreaking, completely different technology, it's just a different panel that has better viewing angles. Like I said, using a TN panel would have been absurd for a media consumption tablet, particularly one that's supposed to be used in both orientations. Not that that's stopping other companies from doing it, but coming from someone like Apple, who maintains an image of erring on the side of quality rather than price, it would have been absurd.

      And as I said, many very high quality displays (even new models) still seem to come with CCFL backlights last time I checked. But I agree that it does make a lot of sense for mobile usage, which is why many manufacturers use it these days.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    12. Re:Sucks outside in bright light by node+3 · · Score: 1

      No, you're missing the point I was making. An LED-backlit IPS display is not your "typical LCD".

      When someone says, your "typical LCD", they mean, "like the one you are looking at right now", and the iPad's display compares far better against the Kindle's display than the display most people are looking at right now.

      The iPad's display is both brighter, and viewable at greater angles, than most of the displays that are in use today.

      And this is borne out by experience. When someone reads "typical LCD", and they recall how utterly useless their own LCD is outdoors, they will assume that the iPad is the same. It's not. It's very usable outdoors in broad daylight for reading.

      And while TN is more frequent (possibly more than 10x more frequent these days), it's not like IPS is some kind of groundbreaking, completely different technology

      And where did I say it was "groundbreaking, completely different"? I said it was not typical. And it's not. Unless your position is that it *is* typical, what is the point of your responses? No wonder you feel the need to put words into my mouth.

  29. But Apple is known for screwing up from time to ti by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sometimes Apple has a period of greatness and then they have a period of... well, not so greatness. Maybe it is time again?

    Personally, I don't know. The Wifi problems sound odd, but then again, who exactly thought putting an metal shield on an antenna was a good idea? But surely Apple would have tested that.

    I think what we are finding is that a lot of people are putting this device under an intense microscope, determined to find any and all flaws and blow them up out of proportion. High trees catch a lot of wind, especially if they fail to fall in previous gusts of hot air. Anyone remember people scoffing the iPod and iPhone? They must be getting desperate for Apple to have one of its famous screw-ups again.

    I think Apple had a simple reason to launch the iPad now. One of its uses is to go outside and use it. Who is going to go outside in the winter? And soonish they will have to announce a new macbook pro anyway (core 2 duo is getting very long in the tooth) and that makes more sense later in the year, and two must have's should be seperated so the victim eh customer has time to recover from the bloodletting that is called buying an Apple product.

    Frankly, I have seen all this negativity before. I don't put much stock in it. If someone were to introduce fire in this day and age, people would find plenty of stuff wrong with it and claim that nobody really needs it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  30. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by CompressedAir · · Score: 5, Funny

    Requires sticks. Dimmer than the sun. Lame.

  31. root by jDeepbeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a sad day when getting root on my own device is considered 'hacking'

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:root by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      It's the old sense of the word, not the new one.

      What? Slashdotters are now ashamed to be called "hackers?" Have all the neckbeards shaved?

    2. Re:root by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess there was a sad day a couple of decades ago. People have been hacking their remote controls, cars, thermostats, etc. for as long as these things have had microprocessors/controllers.

      Notable device hacks from today include the iPhone, iPad, Android phones, and game consoles.

    3. Re:root by JayWilmont · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Your car, DVD player, HDTV, TiVo, gaming console, Mp3 player, oven, & microwave all require hacking to get root.

    4. Re:root by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Ever have a phone before the new Nokias? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM NEVER GAVE YOU ROOT, on your own device as well. Ever own a SNES, NEW, Megadrive, etc...

    5. Re:root by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Ever have a phone before the new Nokias? EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM NEVER GAVE YOU ROOT, on your own device as well. Ever own a SNES, NEW, Megadrive, etc...

      what he means is that it's a sad day when the device manufacturer explicitly prevents (or tries to prevent) you from getting root access, even going so far as to try and classify it as illegal.

  32. How long, baby, how long? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Will one out of every three stories from every newspaper, magazine, website, radio and TV station for the next 18 months really be about the iPad?

    I need to know right now so I can prepare myself by drinking a large glass of neurotoxin, with a bullet to the brain chaser.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:How long, baby, how long? by melikamp · · Score: 1

      No need to prepare, just wait. With iPad, Apple is building up to its killer product: iStab, a translucent suicide booth with an interface to die for.

    2. Re:How long, baby, how long? by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      Will one out of every three stories from every newspaper, magazine, website, radio and TV station for the next 18 months really be about the iPad?

      I need to know right now so I can prepare myself by drinking a large glass of neurotoxin, with a bullet to the brain chaser.

      Doesn't matter. You obviously weren't in Apple's target market, anyway.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    3. Re:How long, baby, how long? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      iStab, a translucent suicide booth with an interface to die for.

      Cool... think it'll be out in time for Christmas?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:How long, baby, how long? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You obviously weren't in Apple's target market, anyway.

      Doesn't matter. Some of their scattershot spam still managed to hit him.

    5. Re:How long, baby, how long? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 0, Troll

      Doesn't matter. You obviously weren't in Apple's target market, anyway.

      You fanbois really do *NOT* give up, do you?

      Why can you just simply not accept that a lot of people simply do *NOT* want to part with so much money for such a device? We're not all drones that simply buy stuff purely because we believe it's being targetted at us...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  33. Really? That is it, I haven't followed to close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but just in my regular reading of various blogs, I've read more problematic reviews than I've read positive ones.

    http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/05/editorial-ipad-prices-are-out-of-control-and-will-kill-us-all/

    http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/04/i-have-laptop-macbook-pro-and-iphone-so.html

    http://www.livescience.com/technology/13-glaring-ipad-shortcomings-100404.html

    Of course it is a 1G product, and Apple has plenty of time and customer capital to spend tweaking things that people care about to get it right. Likely they will. However the shortcomings right now would be dealkillers for many vendors without the hype and reputation of Apple. Being that it is, they may well overcome these issues, and some of them might not bug average consumers enough to matter, but if competitors get to market quick enough without these sorts of limitations, being first may not be the end of the story.

    As it is, I'm glad they are because they draw a very clear bar others will have to pass to succeed and we know by the time 3G iPads roll around whether they own the space or not we will be dealing with some pretty nice new technology.

    Here is hoping the competition is thick.

  34. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You just missed the memo:
    http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/04/04/2223237/iPad-Jailbroken

    BTW, let me be the first to say:
    "Two year olds, is there nothing they can't do?"

  35. Tell ya what... by cosm · · Score: 1

    iDontCareAnymore

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Tell ya what... by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      iDontGiveARatsAss, and yet here we both are...

  36. No thanks - I'm waiting for the next gen by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Apple To Introduce iPDA

    I don't need to stream scaled-down "used-to-be-hi-definition" video in 1024x576, so I'll get the iPDA instead of the iPad.

    1. Re:No thanks - I'm waiting for the next gen by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Resolution aside (since that seems to be pretty much common knowledge), what was more interesting to me was this somewhat scary sentence in the article:

      The first thing you should know is that the iWork apps have no Save command.

      Auto-saving is OK as far as it goes, but I would have thought it would be a good idea to encourage users to keep a known-good (or at least known-state) version of their work at appropriate points. Relying on the vagaries of auto-save history reminds me of that old adage that "computers are very good at forgetting important things, while remembering things that are best long forgotten".

    2. Re:No thanks - I'm waiting for the next gen by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      That IS scary. There are plenty of times I want to revert to my last save ... whether it's editing text, code, or an image. Depending on everything being auto-saved removes that.

  37. we need the why your antispam won't work list by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    some guy has ths great checklist of reasons your antispam idea won't work we need something like that for first looks at apple hardware Here are reasons why your brand new, expensive apple hardware sucks One or more may apply 1) Its exspensive 2) the warranty sucks 3) the battery, powercable, screen, keyboard or other hardware is cleary defective, as evidenced by a large number of failures,and apple won't honor warrantys, and replacing it is a major pain in the ass, and costly if done thru apple 4) Getting your new toy to work with prev generations of apple software is hard 5) I/O has major glitches, including exspensive and spotty wireless web connection, touch screens that don't work Don't complain; just like those fools who buy a new MS OS before SP2, ou are an early adopter guinea pig for the rest of us. I thank you for your service PS: as a mac hater, I think you are all whackjobs; you buy this overpriced crap that doesn't do anything so you think you are cool. My laptop cost 425 bucks; I could buy two or three for the cost of a mac (and specs don't matter - I only do simple stuff, so it doesn't matter how much ram or hd space or whatever i have) but thats just me Instead of showing off with your mac crap, why don't you buy something cheap, and send the money to haiti or save the children. yo can put a little sticker on your cheap cell phone, I got this cheap cell phone instead of an iphone so 50 kids could have dinner... .....

    1. Re:we need the why your antispam won't work list by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Your post is quite strange, almost like you were just trying to string together a bunch of keywords and promote the link to your blog. Your post does not contain a coherent thought.

      Some of your random disconencted thoughts (bad warranties, fail to honor warranties) ignore the fact that survey after survey shows Apple has the number 1 customer service of any computer manufacturer by a massive margin.

    2. Re:we need the why your antispam won't work list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least I haven't spent a huge amount of money to look "cool"
      I spent 450 bucks on my laptop, and gave 450 to starving kids in haiti, so i figure that puts me way ahead of macfanboys with good grammar, coherent thoughts and polite comments

  38. Yes, hacking. by RulerOf · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I understand your sentiment, but it very likely is hacking, particularly in the purest sense of the word.

    So, in true Slashdot spirit:

    It's a sad day when getting root on my own device requires 'hacking'

    FTFY.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    1. Re:Yes, hacking. by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

      So, in true Slashdot spirit:

      It's a sad day when getting root on my own device requires 'hacking'

      FTFY.

      Indeed, this is closer to what I ought to have typed.

      --
      Reply to That ||
  39. A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer? by VendingMenace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where have I heard about that before?

    The future is now :)

    1. Re:A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer? by jbeach · · Score: 1

      When Apple gets a hot actress to voice a perfect guide for how to live your life including martial arts training, then I'll be *all over* that iPad.
      Oh yeah - no phone or teleconferencing.
      iPad fail, Diamond Age win.

      --
      The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
    2. Re:A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its just hardware. It can't tell shit about your surroundings, nor does it come with software that will raise you with the help of ractor.

  40. Conflicted. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    Not to discount the iPad, but the constant barrage of news on this thing undoubtedly makes a dramatic impact on sales. People inevitably want to get on the bandwagon and find a reason to justify getting an iPad.

    If someone else had introduced a similar tablet computer, with a well-designed interface and not chained to any one service I guarantee little attention would be given to the device. Of course, the key point here is that nobody else even tried. There were those tablet PCs several years ago, but since then nobody even tried to improve on those designs. Apple did it and now the inevitable imitators are going to flock to introduce their own versions.

    So I find myself torn between thinking Apple's products are overrated and being impressed by the fact that they can bring a bit of technology to maturity and really make it work. And they understand integration better than most.

    1. Re:Conflicted. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      There were those tablet PCs several years ago, but since then nobody even tried to improve on those designs. Apple did it and now the inevitable imitators are going to flock to introduce their own versions.

      Normally, I'm not the type to correct a factual error since doing so doesn't really turn me on. But in this instance, the factual error leads into an area where I DO find myself fascinated. . .

      So first of all, tablet computer manufacturers, while they cater to a small market, have never stopped coming out with better, faster, sleeker models. HP is one of the leaders in that pack, but Motion Computing with its focus on no-keyboard machines hasn't been sitting still and today boasts a robust fleet of excellent models. The latest ones look pretty space-age and they're a helluva lot more powerful than the Apple machine.

      The reason, though, that these other brands are not getting the free billion dollar ad push that Apple is getting from all quarters of the media, (and this is the part I'm interested in!), is that none of those other machines are designed with the express purpose of turning all current media into a pay-as-you-go-carnival-of-bullshit which has a chance of succeeding with the mentally-dormant People of Earth.

      Big Media, which has undergone a lot of belt-tightening over the last decade thanks to the internet, believes that Apple will save them. And so they're backing Apple all the way in the hopes that if they can convince enough people to pay for things which are normally free, that everybody will get rich, or at least keep their increasingly redundant jobs. (Bearing in mind, that the artists and actual creative working people will be the very last to receive any pennies trickling down from on high, if at all. But that's another story altogether.)

      So that's my piece. As you were. Or carry on. Or whatever you feel like doing.

      -FL

    2. Re:Conflicted. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      You talk about correcting factual errors and then compare the iPad to a company that does not make any tablets aimed at a computer market. Maybe they do not get the same press coverage because they don't make devices priced or equipped for a mass audience.

    3. Re:Conflicted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $2300 for a tablet? No thanks.

    4. Re:Conflicted. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      You talk about correcting factual errors and then compare the iPad to a company that does not make any tablets aimed at a computer market. Maybe they do not get the same press coverage because they don't make devices priced or equipped for a mass audience.

      We were discussing design, not price. But since you bring it up, price is a function of demand, and no, there is no large scale demand for the tablet PC. That's already been well established. Most people don't actually want them because they're missing basic functionality, ie, no keyboard.

      To deal with this, Motion Computing shifted their focus from the regular market to the medical market because nobody was buying their consumer grade gear. But that just makes more poignant how big a desire for the iPad the media has. Apple has created a device which doesn't need a keyboard because it has one overriding purpose; selling content.

      Don't think, don't create. Just Pay and Shut Up. The iPad surgically removes the single most astonishing and powerful aspect of the new global communications, that of interactive networking, and turns the internet back into a one-way medium. Television capable of displaying static images. Yay. This is perfect for those who crave such a thing; those who wish to go back to sleep.

      -FL

  41. c-c-c-combo zing! by citylivin · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter. You obviously weren't in Apple's target market, anyway.

    I dunno, his username starts with "pope", so there is a good chance that he is infact gay.

     

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  42. I'm in Love With My iPad, so says Roger Taylor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The machine of a dream
    Such a clean machine
    With the fingers a squeezin'
    And the bezel caps all gleam

    When I'm holdin' your wheel
    All I hear is your gear
    When my hand's on your screen
    Oh it's like a disease son

    I'm in love with my iPad
    Gotta feel for my ipadmobile
    Get a grip on my boy racer software
    Such a thrill when your voices squeal

    Told my girl I'll have to forget her
    Rather buy me a new iPadburetor
    So she made tracks sayin'
    This is the end now
    iPads don't talk back
    They're just two-finger friends now

    When I'm holdin your wheel
    All I hear is your gear
    When I'm cruisin' in overdrive
    Don't have to listen to no run of the mill talk jive

    I'm in love with my iPad
    Gotta feel for my ipadmobile
    I'm in love with my iPad
    String back gloves in my ipadolove

  43. Progress! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's fantastic that people think the iPad represents progress.

    wow!

  44. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by shaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometimes Apple has a period of greatness and then they have a period of... well, not so greatness. Maybe it is time again?

    Apple sold 300,000 iPads on the first day. Their market cap just passed Wal-Mart making them the 3rd most valuable company traded in US markets, behind only Microsoft and Exxon-Mobil. Regardless of particular views on the merits of the iPhone or the iPad, they are re-defining their markets and forcing competitive innovation just by their very existence. This is almost by definition a "great" period for a company.

  45. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by fermion · · Score: 1
    The WiFi is not surprising. On the first iPhone getting a signal was a problem, at least for me. On my current Apple laptops, the WiFi is sometimes lost and only a shutdown will fix it. That the iPad has flaky wifi was to be expected. That the 3G is, maybe, indefinitely delayed is not a surprise either.

    In terms of the intense inspection, that is absolutely true, but such inspection is valid. Apple sets themselves up as the gold standard in consumer electronics. Not only do competitors analyze every device to see what they can reverse engineer and implement, they also must find flaws to that they can continue to sell their own kit, which is often inferior. For instance, everyone says how closed the Apple laptop is, but no one mentions that even with all the expandability of a PC laptop, one cannot get a trackpad as efficient as the standard apple trackpad. OTOH, when Apple shipped with the dreaded puck mouse, it was easily replaced.

    In fact Apple is in a precarious position, reminiscent of the newton. Most of the sync for the electronics line is through iTunes. iTunes is a program primarily concerned with DRM, and therefore design decision tend to be focused on limited transfer information rather than letting the user get to information. This means that I cannot back up my iPhone on two machines. I am arbitrarily limited because people are afraid I am going to steal music. This was an issue, in a different fashion, on the Newton. The Newton was a very well connected machine, it had full network capability. But there was a sense that it should not be too integrated. The same fear of too integrated seems to be evident on both machines.

    Apple has solved this in terms of PDA. All PDA data is not synched over Mobileme, or other services, and is outside of iTunes. User generated content can be moved through other venues as well. What we see here though is that users are going to create various other content, such as office documents, and we are being thwarted by the iTunes DRM watch. If they do not fix this quickly, then the potential of using the iPad as a content generation platform will be destroyed. At the very least Apple must implement a native bridge between the WebDAV extension that iPhone OS. The MobileMe app is not sufficient. Apps must have the ability to access the filesystem. If the file format for iPhone iWork apps is different from iWork applications, then they have made a grave error indeed, just like they did with Newton.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  46. That's not REALLY why you like it. by weston · · Score: 0, Troll

    See, actually, I do want a device and not yet another computer. Why?

    It doesn't matter why you think you want what Apple's selling -- we know what the real reason is (fanboism/you're a sheeple/you like shiny things/Apple's marketing).

    It's certainly not because you've done any kind of actual analysis of your wants/needs and how the iPad might actually meet them. I know, because I've done a careful detailed analysis based on my totally objective criteria for a tablet-like product, and the iPad comes up short every time. Just like all Apple products do if you're smart enough to see things like I do.

    Sriously, what is the iPad, anyway? Sure, it might be a better e-reader than a laptop or a small mobile device, but it doesn't have e-Ink, so it can't be used as an e-reader. Sure, it might be able to watch video, but it doesn't have a fullsize screen and if your going to have a screen smaller than a laptop you might as well watch it on your open Android phone. Sure, it might have apps for working with documents, but it doesn't have a keyboard or you have to use a bluetooth keyboard or something so it looses to any netbook or laptop for cryin out loud. And of course your limited to just whatever you can find on the App store, and who knows what that is this week what with Apple changing what apps are allowed.

    The only people this would appeal to are those who want something like an e-reader but don't care about e-ink and want it to do media and light computing stuff too. I don't know about you but I already have a laptop, a Nook, and a smartphone for that, I don't want to carry around another device that just does all of that.

    The iPad is clearly for stupid people, and the only way we're going to save them from themselves, is if we stand up to the hordes of fanbois that threaten to drown out us clear-headed thinkers here on slashdot and speak the truth t o power clearly.

    1. Re:That's not REALLY why you like it. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Sriously, what is the iPad, anyway? Sure, it might be a better e-reader than a laptop or a small mobile device, but it doesn't have e-Ink, so it can't be used as an e-reader.

      Well, I did buy a Kindle 2 last year March and returned it after 3 weeks. I thought e-ink was the greatest concept but the contrast leaves much to be desire. It's dark grey text on a medium/light grey screen for christ-sakes.

      And IPS screens are rather nice. Heck, I read a normal LCD screen all day as it is and it doesn't bother me. I have to wonder when the "you can't read on a computer monitor" took over? For me, it's more to do with whether the monitor has light sensor - monitors just tick me off when it doesn't match the ambient brightness and very few people actually adjust it with any frequency - but phones and this tablet has one so it's no problem.

      The iPad is clearly for stupid people, and the only way we're going to save them from themselves, is if we stand up to the hordes of fanbois that threaten to drown out us clear-headed thinkers here on slashdot and speak the truth t o power clearly.

      Is this sarcasm/satire or just a self-fulfilling opinion?

  47. Re:Wiping Away by Ron_Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

    This is certainly not off topic. Crude, perhaps but AC gets the point across.

    --
    ~ Ron Fitzgerald
  48. I hope he fails! by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

    He = Mr iPad

    If we defeat him on this WiFi issue then we Republicans will sweep the next election.

    Long live CHAOS.

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  49. k "QQ" dawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do."
      - Benjamin Franklin

    If you can make a better product, or have a company make one for you, then make one. Alpha models always have some problems and Apple is probably trying to resolve the issues quickly but, stooping to using 2 year olds in your argument is rather poor form. Your animosity for Apple and the iPad is palpable. I would have more respect for you if you would just admit you HATE it rather than using all of these fixable problems to spread your passive-aggressive diatribe.

    1. Re:k "QQ" dawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's problem is ideology and arrogance. That's why he iPad has so many deficiencies.

      And people have already done better: put Android on a tablet.

      Apple optimizes their product for PR, marketing, style, and buzz. The problem with that is that they end up setting the agenda and standards for the rest of us even if we don't like their products or approach. Microsoft is going to copy apple again and then most people are going to be stuck with a bad imitation of an already badly designed system, while the good software keeps languishing,

      That's why it's important to speak up.

  50. The WiFi thing by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    More than likely the antenna. My laptop sees networks that my iPod Touch refuses to even see. Or it could be the Broadcom chip, or even the iPhone OS. Who knows.

  51. Bah, Apple. by jeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wanted a tablet, but wasn't looking to get anything by Apple or something Windows based. Linux's touch support seems pretty dodgy, so I ended up settling on an Entourage Edge. It looks pretty horrible asthetically, but has been incredibly useful/fun. It's an android-based ereader/tablet with two screens, a WACOM-stylus eink on one side, and a typical touch screen LCD on the other. After using it for a about a week now, I definitely recommend it to others. www.entourageedge.com

    --
    If you want to be seen, stand up. If you want to be heard, speak up. If you want to be respected, sit down and shut up.
    1. Re:Bah, Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had been considering this for sometime too. I have a stupid question about this product to which I dont find an answer in their webpage. Do you have the ability to switch off one of the screens, when you dont use them?

      For example when I read a book on e-ink, i would prefer the LCD to be off (and save power)

    2. Re:Bah, Apple. by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Linux's touch support seems pretty dodgy, so I ended up settling on an... android-based ereader/tablet.

      :cough:

  52. My review by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    I've surfed the web on it, I've read my email. I started reading a book. I've watched a few Netflix TV shows and part of a movie on it. Seems to do what it was intended to and by comparison to my iPhone, was a much easier experience on me because of the larger screen. Seems to me like it's a device that does what it's touted to. And I think it can only get better as we have more developers that are actually able to get their hands on it and see their app running on it first hand.

  53. of course it's a problem with your router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Apple product is brand new.
    My router is old and dusty.
    Maybe I should get a new shiny router.
    Maybe Apple could sell me a shiny new router?

  54. Rev. A Apple product has problems! by Rafe_Aguilera · · Score: 1

    News at 11.

    Really, why are people surprised? Just because it's Apple doesn't mean first release is going to be flawless. Shiny maybe, but certainly not flawless.

  55. Re:My status report. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic? Yes. Troll? Yes. Absolutely Hilarious? Yes. Posting anonymously since I spent a mod point fending off the off-topic modders.

  56. Reading, games, little else by pydev · · Score: 1

    The iPad is good for reading and some type of games. But Apple didn't figure out how to make a simple user interface, they just limited the device to only being able to do simple things well. Being simplistic is not the same as being simple.

    Yes, Apple, there is a reason other systems have buttons and UI standards for things like Menu and Cancel; on the iPad, every app does this differently. And although file systems and explorers suck, what sucks even worse is if every application on the machine has to implement it's own file browser and network file system interface because the OS doesn't. And although one can live without multitasking, it really is a pain.

    It's not just iWork that suffers: PDF viewers and annotators, offline web pages, split browser windows, blogging tools, sticky notes, etc. -- all of them have confusing and messy workarounds for the limitations of the iPhone OS and still don't work quite right.

    The iPad is actually a great device for a limited set of functions. But Apple needlessly screwed up usability and the OS. Maybe iPhone OS4 will fix sone of these problems.

  57. Not a solution by pydev · · Score: 1

    Ipads are intended for mobile computing. Are you going to carry an Airport extender... to the airport?

    iPad wifi reception is objectively considerably worse than other systems side by side. Let's hope the can fix that in firmware.

  58. Satire (not troll) by weston · · Score: 1

    Is this sarcasm/satire or just a self-fulfilling opinion?

    Satire.

    However, either I was a little too subtle, or this is genuinely what your run-of-the-mill knee-jerk Apple Hater sounds like, because at least one moderator who marked me a "troll" couldn't tell the difference either.

    1. Re:Satire (not troll) by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      There was a gleam of it here and there, but on balance, it was just a little too close to 'accurate portrayal'.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  59. "Market Cap" Is Virtually worthless... by meehawl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    as a means of ranking one company against another. Or did we learn nothing from Enron and Worldcom? Look instead at sales, at product diversification, licensing and pipelines, and at past performance relative to market performance in terms of alpha/beta. Back in the early 1980s, when Apple launched the Lisa/Mac and Microsoft was launching Windows 1.0, Apple's employee number, market cap *and* sales were literally hundreds of times larger than Microsoft's at that time. Look where they went, and where they are now.

    --

    Da Blog
  60. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by indiechild · · Score: 1

    It's all about momentum. Apple uses a lot of the tactics described by 37signals in their new book "ReWork". You just want to ship a high quality product (and it is high quality, despite what seem like teething problems) and get it out the door. Worry about the more complicated stuff (like 3rd party multi-tasking) later. If you keep delaying the release to perfect your product, you'll end up with a Duke Nukem Forever.

  61. Oblig. MST3K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    early adaptor? WTF is that?

    Are you in early Europe? Do you need an early adaptor?

  62. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by fatwilbur · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, Apple is 'worth' over $210 billion dollars. Reminds me of two years ago when my neighbor said his small bungalow house was 'worth' half a million dollars.

    I'm not going to venture a guess as to what Apple is REALLY worth as a company, but when something is so extremely hyped in the media, it's stock is almost guaranteed to be overvalued.

  63. The problem is the OS by Zevensoft · · Score: 1

    The Wi-Fi issues aren't new, they've been around since the iPhone, it has trouble with throughput dying on 802.11g networks. The fix? Setting the router to 802.11b only mode. Nice job Apple, if only everyone could be as half-arsed as you and still turn a prof- oh wait.

  64. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by Americano · · Score: 1

    Hype is not always a useful indicator of "overvalued". Google was roundly panned as 'not worth the hype,' when it's initial offering @ $85/share happened. And it's now worth nearly $570 a share.

    Considering Apple has few (if any) debts, billions of dollars in cash (as I read it on Yahoo Finance, about 28 billion), a multitude of physical assets (land, office buildings, etc), is one of the (perhaps THE now) largest music retailers in the US, and a physical product line that is the envy of the tech world... I'd say that $210 billion isn't that hard to swallow as a "corporate net worth."

  65. I still don't see the significance... or do I? by nataflux · · Score: 1

    There are already better tablet devices in existence that are more functional and support more types of activity, but why so much attention has been centered on the ipad, i can only assume it is apple hype, generated by its market - casual electronics users. I mean, if I really wanted to, I could pick up a tablet pc, throw linux on it, and sit in an airport terminal streaming shoutcast stations and write a paper about the benefits of having a portable computer, while browsing /. on a cellular or wifi network. I guess the real value in the ipad is that all the hardware and peripherals required that would allow me to do such tasks in the last paragraph are consolidated and compacted into a single device, so the value is not just for the consumer but for the future of portable computing, as this will set a standard for other tablet companies to make such commodities as easy and refined to use (with the proprietariness that Apple forces upon us of course). I'm not implying that arbitrary hype and buying a product purely because of its brand is a good thing, but this situation to me is at least shaping up to be beneficial for the entire concept of a computer.

  66. It's all relative by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Predicted sales 299,999, actual sales 300,000 - result: awesomenitude.

    Predicted sales 300,001, actual sales 300,000 - result: suckage.

      -- Wilkins Micawber

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  67. Re:But Apple is known for screwing up from time to by harl · · Score: 1

    No they shipped 300,000 on the first day.

    They sold those 300,000 over the course of months. This is clearly stated in the first line of the article.

    --
    I find being offended by me offensive.
  68. what's this about you libelling others here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. What's this about you libelling others here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  70. What's this about you libelling others here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  71. What's this about you cyber-stalking and harassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi APK! Adding more fuel to the fire, I see. You must think that this is a bluff?

  72. Please stop B!tching about Apple.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously there is no reason for us to complain about Apple products, they are the only company apart from Google left on this planet which actually tries to Innovate.... Within the past 10 years no other BIG software company has done anything close to revolutionary as to what Apple has done. If we take a look at Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco, SUN.. which were all renowned to their innovative products in the 90's are not operating like Blue Chip companies.. mostly surviving on their landmark products or else buying small companies.....

  73. whatever item,if it is from apple, then it is hot and fashion. http://www.electronicswholesaledistributor.com/