The number one program most people that I deal with use as their 'deal breaker' reason for not converting over to a LINUX based OS is
Quickbooks. Both personal and business users have too much of their financial history already invested into these programs, and would have to either re-enter a massive amount of history to bring any other solution up to speed, or they would have to switch over to a new LINUX based software solution but still have to run a Windows machine to access their past data, which is obviously a stupid option as well.
Although at one time there were vague rumors of a LINUX version of Quickbooks in the future, it's obvious that now the preferred 'fix' is to sell everyone their monthly cloud based accounting instead.
If a system programmed by a student in the 80's has worked adequately for this long, it's too bad the Grand Rapids Public School System didn't learn anything from this.
There is no doubt that instead of putting 1.5 -2 million dollars of taxpayer funds into a replacement, they could instead replace this system with some additional student programming effort and some Raspberry PI units, at a minuscule fraction of that kind of expense.
I'm glad I am no longer a taxpayer in the Grand Rapids area, this kind of spending of taxpayers' funding used to make me insane.
Here's what Comcast said in their official press release-
“Today, we move on. Of course, we would have liked to bring our great products to new cities, but we structured this deal so that if the government didn’t agree, we could walk away,"
Here's what Comcast didn't say in their official press release, but should have-
Now that we no longer have to 'play nice' to help get the merger approved, you can all expect big price increases in our monopolistic markets, reinstated data caps with BIG upcharges for those of you that stream the bulk of your video content instead of paying us for cable access, and further obfuscation of that silly agreement we made to provide low cost internet access for low income families!
We are still the 6000 lb gorilla of the industry and we will do anything we please. Just try to stop us!
We went to local HD programming with an OTA antenna and MythTV setup a few years ago and it has worked out just fine. Sure there were a few cable shows that were sacrificed. Guess what? Many could be viewed with various online options, and those that couldn't were gradually replaced by new 'favorites' from the available OTA signals. Not that it's entirely as much as a money saver as it should be. Comcrap in my market charges a PREMIUM RATE for internet only service (about 70-80 % of the rate for the basic Internet/TV bundles). They can see the writing on the walls, cable TV is doomed as a revenue stream, so they are shifting their pricing structures so that Internet access will be their primary cash cow in the future.
We actually added a very "limited basic" cable TV/Internet bundle back into our service this past year because the bundle saves $30 a month over Internet Only service. I did not let them reconnect all of the internal house wiring back to cable, which I had completely converted over to use the OTA antenna system. I only let them add the one outlet in the living room for cable. The cable service is provided from a deliberately crippled digital box that will only output in SD resolution unless we pay for additional upgraded service. But to be honest, since our OTA setup provides excellent HD programming, we don't care. The toddler happily watches SD cartoons on the cable box some times, and the rest of the time, we watch great HD programming on our own antenna system in every room in the house.
The MythTV setup allows TONS more HD recording capacity than any cable company provided DVR, with viewing options in every room in the house, plus the ability to start watching in one room and resume watching in another, multiple viewings of the same recordings in different rooms at the same time, and a whole host of other features. The cost of the OTA antenna setup, the MythTV backend, the hard drives for 3-5TB of storage, and muliple MythTV frontend machines was not inconsquential. But MythTV can use older hardware effectively enough that the entire cost of this switch over has been entirely recovered from the reduced cable bills. And it can be done in stages. The old cable system did not have access to DVR functions in every room, but evolution/expansion of the MytHTV system provides all of the functions that the previous cable company DVR system offered and much, much more, in every room in the house.
If/when they try to bump the rate on the Limited Basic cable/Internet bundle, we'll happily ditch the cable to go back to Internet only service. But as long as we can save money with the bundle ($300-400/yr) we'll keep signing up for a service we barely use. And the cable company gets to doctor their numbers to make it look like they are not losing as many cable tv subscribers as they really are losing to their stockholders
My eyesight would never accept trying to read on a screen this small.
But I have used this same approach for creating a dedicated device to assist with tracking my diabetes.
A used $20 phablet + android diabetes tracking app = great diabetes tracking device
One possible reason why this is not offered is because it is a service that already IS offered by various cable TV providers.
I suspect that the studios probably don't want Netflix and other similar providers to cut into those profits, nor deal with any possible backlash from the all-to-powerful cable giants.
I just completed a migration of 3 machines for a client.
1 XP machine was replaced with a different machine running Vista Home Premium.Their UPS shipping data was migrated to the new machine, as well as updating the software.
1 XP machine was upgraded to a fresh install of Windows 7 Professional.This machine also had to have a 'forced upgrade' from Quickbooks
1 XP machine was replaced with a re-certified Dell running Windows 7 Professional.
And since they had a certain piece of software they could not do without on that last machine, software that would not run/install on Windows 7, I set up a fresh XP install, fully patched and updated, on a SFF machine dedicated to that one task, which has no Internet or network access.
In the process of the migration, I also discovered torrent software installed on one machine by an as yet unidentified employee. All machines are now locked down to prevent unauthorized installation of any type of software.
Not to mention that this type of merger would give Comcast a roughly 30% revenue boost.
Revenue they have already shown us all that they are quite capable of using to bribe government employees at all levels to promote their own financial interests over the rights and protections those same government employees are charged with protecting!
Plain and simply the easiest distro for those migrating to Linux for the first time
Use 13 because it is a Long Term Release model, and choose either the 32 or 64 bit version according to your needs
Although not new to Linux, I've been using Mint for years as my primary desktop, and it does 99% of everything I need to do. For the remaining 1%, I use Crossover or Virtualbox
I've recently installed it for my fiance on her laptop, which previously ran Vista, and not only does it run BETTER than Vista ever did, she's completely happy, and has never used Linux previously
I've used Knoppix, Puppy, SUSE, Centos, Ubuntu, Mepis, Arch, Vector, and even DSL, but for migrating to Linux with little or no previous Linux experience, you simply cannot beat Linux Mint.
The only other word of advice is to check up on how to set up your/home directory on a separate partition during the initial install. This way you have the option to completely re-install or upgrade your OS without losing your user data at some point in the future.
Using MythTV (the Mythbuntu variant) and an OTA antenna with a pair of HDHomerun dual tuners was my own answer to getting rid of a massively bloated cable bill.The most surprising result, six months later, is that those 'cable' shows that were going to be sacrificed, and sorely missed, simply turned out not to be so important after all. Let's face it, most folks have a finite amount of viewing time available, and as it turns out, shows that were scrapped were quickly replaced by other shows, and became replacement 'favorites' instead. Shows that had not been watched previously, due to the amount of available viewing time, turned out to be just as enjoyable as the ones they replaced. Let's face it, none of the stuff aired on ANY network or cable lineup is all that exceptional in the first place, it's not really all that hard to find something that can be an equally mindless diversion.
The biggest surprise in our particular household was how large the percentage of viewing shifted to PBS, for both adult and children's programming, as well as discovering that the OTA antenna could also (in my location) receive a couple of Canadian signals which have excellent programming, that had never been offered through the local Comcast cable feed. Sure, there's always the option of online streaming for some programming now and again, but far, far less that we initially expected.
On the technical side, I now have the ability to actually record up to five signals at once, more if I use the multiplexing feature of HDTV broadcasts. The old DVR could handle two, and no multiplexing capability. Storage is limited to what *I* decide it will be. Instead of being stuck with 60-120 hours of non-HD programming, and no option to expand beyond that because I'm stuck with a DVR that actually supports expandable storage but is locked out of doing so by a cable provider. With 3.5TB of storage online, I can handle 500 hours of HD programming easily, and I can expand that to the limits of what I want to invest in HD space. Last but not least, all of my recorded media is available on every TV in the house, using either dedicated frontend machines, Laptops running XBMC, and in the case of my toddler, a Raspberry Pi based frontend to service his own viewing requirements of his favorite shows, plus ripped versions of his DVD collection, all on demand, (with a little assistance from Mom and Dad).
Not to say that there were no hurdles to overcome, and to set up a fully networked MythTV setp does require an investment in equipment and time, as well as some routine maintenance, but now all five TVs in my house have full access to 30 OTA channels, any and all scheduled recordings, an extensive music collection, online photo viewing, weather reporting, selected online news feeds, as well as an extensive DVD collection. No cable company that I am aware of offers this type of all in one media solution, and based on what I was paying for the paltry level of service I was previously subscribed to, with constant price increases looming in the future, I'm one very happy cable cutter these days!
Actually Google appears not to be thinking too clearly at all lately in regards to Chrome and Linux.
Earlier last year a Chrome update on Linux Mint 13 was so unusable that I, as well as others I am sure, had no choice but to switch to Firefox if they wanted a usable browser. It took well over a month before this was resolved, but ultimately one of the updates to Chrome magically solved the problem.
Just a few weeks ago, another Chrome update resulted in the resurrection of a previously 'fixed' full screen bug, that once again, renders Chrome unusable with Linux Mint 13. At least one update, possibly two, since then still have not fixed the problem, and once again, if you want a functional browser, Firefox is the logical choice.
If Chrome was breaking an obscure Linux derivative this could probably be understandable, but breaking a popular Ubuntu based distro like Mint proves that there is not near enough attention to detail being given to Chrome on Linux these days. Twice in less than a year, no choice but to find an alternate browser means I am faced with the possibility that, although I have been a devoted Chrome supporter right from the start, I'm starting to think that a permanent migration away from Chrome might be less problematic if this is what is going to become the 'norm' for Chrome and Linux.
Google's approach with RHEL just seems to be a further indication of a lessening of how important Google thinks Chrome and Linux are for the future.
I'm certain that come August I won't be getting a permanent 1/6th reduction of the junk mail that has to be carted off to the local landfill every week...
The idea of everyone sharing their wifi with everyone else is nothing less than delusional.
For all of the legal issues brought up already, and numerous others.
Short of state sponsored free wifi for anyone and everyone, it's just not going to happen.
And I'm pretty sure that most folks would be highly skeptical of how much data the 'state' was collecting on any such endeavor anyway.
It's no secret that the politicians here in the U.S. are the best that money can buy....
Now if the citizens that voted them into office could only figure out a way to get legislation passed that forces them to represent the interests of their constituents, instead of serving the interests of their campaign contributors in order to take advantage of their constituents, we'd be making some much needed progress towards what the original 'Congress' intended.
The Beta doesn't work on Linux Mint 13, due to all sorts of issues with needing a specific version of Flash, or messages about vendor drivers.
And then there's the fubar that clicking the Steam launcher that was put on my desktop by the beta opens in Chrome, and Steam only seems to want to work properly with Firefox, which is installed on my system, but was not selected by the installer.
If you get past all of those hurdles, and get steam running under Firefox, you quickly discover that almost all "Free" games (for trying out Steam Beta on LInux) are "not available for your platform".
Did get one Free game to agree to install, but Steam indicated there would be a download time of over 3-1/2 hours for the installation (on cable internet mind you!)
Uhhhhh... No thanks....
Maybe a few more betas later this will be a workable platform.
First Impressions? Not ready for even sub-prime time...
Slashdot Mirror
The number one program most people that I deal with use as their 'deal breaker' reason for not converting over to a LINUX based OS is Quickbooks. Both personal and business users have too much of their financial history already invested into these programs, and would have to either re-enter a massive amount of history to bring any other solution up to speed, or they would have to switch over to a new LINUX based software solution but still have to run a Windows machine to access their past data, which is obviously a stupid option as well. Although at one time there were vague rumors of a LINUX version of Quickbooks in the future, it's obvious that now the preferred 'fix' is to sell everyone their monthly cloud based accounting instead.
If I am so ignorant, what does that say about you, that keeps this dialog going?
And somebody else apparently needs to get laid more frequently....
Imagine that. All that diatribe, and yet my comment still got a response from you anyway.
If a system programmed by a student in the 80's has worked adequately for this long, it's too bad the Grand Rapids Public School System didn't learn anything from this. There is no doubt that instead of putting 1.5 -2 million dollars of taxpayer funds into a replacement, they could instead replace this system with some additional student programming effort and some Raspberry PI units, at a minuscule fraction of that kind of expense. I'm glad I am no longer a taxpayer in the Grand Rapids area, this kind of spending of taxpayers' funding used to make me insane.
Here's what Comcast said in their official press release-
“Today, we move on. Of course, we would have liked to bring our great products to new cities, but we structured this deal so that if the government didn’t agree, we could walk away,"
Here's what Comcast didn't say in their official press release, but should have-
Now that we no longer have to 'play nice' to help get the merger approved, you can all expect big price increases in our monopolistic markets, reinstated data caps with BIG upcharges for those of you that stream the bulk of your video content instead of paying us for cable access, and further obfuscation of that silly agreement we made to provide low cost internet access for low income families!
We are still the 6000 lb gorilla of the industry and we will do anything we please. Just try to stop us!
We went to local HD programming with an OTA antenna and MythTV setup a few years ago and it has worked out just fine. Sure there were a few cable shows that were sacrificed. Guess what? Many could be viewed with various online options, and those that couldn't were gradually replaced by new 'favorites' from the available OTA signals. Not that it's entirely as much as a money saver as it should be. Comcrap in my market charges a PREMIUM RATE for internet only service (about 70-80 % of the rate for the basic Internet/TV bundles). They can see the writing on the walls, cable TV is doomed as a revenue stream, so they are shifting their pricing structures so that Internet access will be their primary cash cow in the future.
We actually added a very "limited basic" cable TV/Internet bundle back into our service this past year because the bundle saves $30 a month over Internet Only service. I did not let them reconnect all of the internal house wiring back to cable, which I had completely converted over to use the OTA antenna system. I only let them add the one outlet in the living room for cable. The cable service is provided from a deliberately crippled digital box that will only output in SD resolution unless we pay for additional upgraded service. But to be honest, since our OTA setup provides excellent HD programming, we don't care. The toddler happily watches SD cartoons on the cable box some times, and the rest of the time, we watch great HD programming on our own antenna system in every room in the house.
The MythTV setup allows TONS more HD recording capacity than any cable company provided DVR, with viewing options in every room in the house, plus the ability to start watching in one room and resume watching in another, multiple viewings of the same recordings in different rooms at the same time, and a whole host of other features. The cost of the OTA antenna setup, the MythTV backend, the hard drives for 3-5TB of storage, and muliple MythTV frontend machines was not inconsquential. But MythTV can use older hardware effectively enough that the entire cost of this switch over has been entirely recovered from the reduced cable bills. And it can be done in stages. The old cable system did not have access to DVR functions in every room, but evolution/expansion of the MytHTV system provides all of the functions that the previous cable company DVR system offered and much, much more, in every room in the house.
If/when they try to bump the rate on the Limited Basic cable/Internet bundle, we'll happily ditch the cable to go back to Internet only service. But as long as we can save money with the bundle ($300-400/yr) we'll keep signing up for a service we barely use. And the cable company gets to doctor their numbers to make it look like they are not losing as many cable tv subscribers as they really are losing to their stockholders
My eyesight would never accept trying to read on a screen this small.
But I have used this same approach for creating a dedicated device to assist with tracking my diabetes.
A used $20 phablet + android diabetes tracking app = great diabetes tracking device
One possible reason why this is not offered is because it is a service that already IS offered by various cable TV providers.
I suspect that the studios probably don't want Netflix and other similar providers to cut into those profits, nor deal with any possible backlash from the all-to-powerful cable giants.
Not a problem, I moved my free DNS services to No-IP a couple of years ago.
I just completed a migration of 3 machines for a client.
1 XP machine was replaced with a different machine running Vista Home Premium.Their UPS shipping data was migrated to the new machine, as well as updating the software.
1 XP machine was upgraded to a fresh install of Windows 7 Professional.This machine also had to have a 'forced upgrade' from Quickbooks
1 XP machine was replaced with a re-certified Dell running Windows 7 Professional.
And since they had a certain piece of software they could not do without on that last machine, software that would not run/install on Windows 7, I set up a fresh XP install, fully patched and updated, on a SFF machine dedicated to that one task, which has no Internet or network access.
In the process of the migration, I also discovered torrent software installed on one machine by an as yet unidentified employee. All machines are now locked down to prevent unauthorized installation of any type of software.
Just sit tight until these are perfected, and then buy a couple of dozen-
Next-gen “Archival Disc” will squeeze 1TB of data onto optical discs
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets...
Either that, or install a duplicate RAID to back up the first one....
'nuff said!
Not to mention that this type of merger would give Comcast a roughly 30% revenue boost. Revenue they have already shown us all that they are quite capable of using to bribe government employees at all levels to promote their own financial interests over the rights and protections those same government employees are charged with protecting!
The obvious logic fault in this argument is the assumption that local governments are any less corrupt than state or federal ones....
Of course the FCC will let this happen - There are still lots of six and seven figure salary positions open for ex-FCC honchos at Comcast!
Plain and simply the easiest distro for those migrating to Linux for the first time
/home directory on a separate partition during the initial install. This way you have the option to completely re-install or upgrade your OS without losing your user data at some point in the future.
Use 13 because it is a Long Term Release model, and choose either the 32 or 64 bit version according to your needs
Although not new to Linux, I've been using Mint for years as my primary desktop, and it does 99% of everything I need to do. For the remaining 1%, I use Crossover or Virtualbox
I've recently installed it for my fiance on her laptop, which previously ran Vista, and not only does it run BETTER than Vista ever did, she's completely happy, and has never used Linux previously
I've used Knoppix, Puppy, SUSE, Centos, Ubuntu, Mepis, Arch, Vector, and even DSL, but for migrating to Linux with little or no previous Linux experience, you simply cannot beat Linux Mint.
The only other word of advice is to check up on how to set up your
No need to hassle with scraping for your EPG data, when an annual subscription to Schedules Direct is only $25 year.
There's also a 2 month 'tryout' for $6, to test how well it integrates with your media OS.
Their website lists about 4 dozen or so applications their service works with-
http://www.schedulesdirect.org/
Using MythTV (the Mythbuntu variant) and an OTA antenna with a pair of HDHomerun dual tuners was my own answer to getting rid of a massively bloated cable bill.The most surprising result, six months later, is that those 'cable' shows that were going to be sacrificed, and sorely missed, simply turned out not to be so important after all. Let's face it, most folks have a finite amount of viewing time available, and as it turns out, shows that were scrapped were quickly replaced by other shows, and became replacement 'favorites' instead. Shows that had not been watched previously, due to the amount of available viewing time, turned out to be just as enjoyable as the ones they replaced. Let's face it, none of the stuff aired on ANY network or cable lineup is all that exceptional in the first place, it's not really all that hard to find something that can be an equally mindless diversion.
The biggest surprise in our particular household was how large the percentage of viewing shifted to PBS, for both adult and children's programming, as well as discovering that the OTA antenna could also (in my location) receive a couple of Canadian signals which have excellent programming, that had never been offered through the local Comcast cable feed. Sure, there's always the option of online streaming for some programming now and again, but far, far less that we initially expected.
On the technical side, I now have the ability to actually record up to five signals at once, more if I use the multiplexing feature of HDTV broadcasts. The old DVR could handle two, and no multiplexing capability. Storage is limited to what *I* decide it will be. Instead of being stuck with 60-120 hours of non-HD programming, and no option to expand beyond that because I'm stuck with a DVR that actually supports expandable storage but is locked out of doing so by a cable provider. With 3.5TB of storage online, I can handle 500 hours of HD programming easily, and I can expand that to the limits of what I want to invest in HD space. Last but not least, all of my recorded media is available on every TV in the house, using either dedicated frontend machines, Laptops running XBMC, and in the case of my toddler, a Raspberry Pi based frontend to service his own viewing requirements of his favorite shows, plus ripped versions of his DVD collection, all on demand, (with a little assistance from Mom and Dad).
Not to say that there were no hurdles to overcome, and to set up a fully networked MythTV setp does require an investment in equipment and time, as well as some routine maintenance, but now all five TVs in my house have full access to 30 OTA channels, any and all scheduled recordings, an extensive music collection, online photo viewing, weather reporting, selected online news feeds, as well as an extensive DVD collection. No cable company that I am aware of offers this type of all in one media solution, and based on what I was paying for the paltry level of service I was previously subscribed to, with constant price increases looming in the future, I'm one very happy cable cutter these days!
Actually Google appears not to be thinking too clearly at all lately in regards to Chrome and Linux. Earlier last year a Chrome update on Linux Mint 13 was so unusable that I, as well as others I am sure, had no choice but to switch to Firefox if they wanted a usable browser. It took well over a month before this was resolved, but ultimately one of the updates to Chrome magically solved the problem. Just a few weeks ago, another Chrome update resulted in the resurrection of a previously 'fixed' full screen bug, that once again, renders Chrome unusable with Linux Mint 13. At least one update, possibly two, since then still have not fixed the problem, and once again, if you want a functional browser, Firefox is the logical choice. If Chrome was breaking an obscure Linux derivative this could probably be understandable, but breaking a popular Ubuntu based distro like Mint proves that there is not near enough attention to detail being given to Chrome on Linux these days. Twice in less than a year, no choice but to find an alternate browser means I am faced with the possibility that, although I have been a devoted Chrome supporter right from the start, I'm starting to think that a permanent migration away from Chrome might be less problematic if this is what is going to become the 'norm' for Chrome and Linux. Google's approach with RHEL just seems to be a further indication of a lessening of how important Google thinks Chrome and Linux are for the future.
I'm certain that come August I won't be getting a permanent 1/6th reduction of the junk mail that has to be carted off to the local landfill every week...
It also means the government wouldn't need to subpoena records of your internet activity from a third party, since they would already have it.....
The idea of everyone sharing their wifi with everyone else is nothing less than delusional. For all of the legal issues brought up already, and numerous others. Short of state sponsored free wifi for anyone and everyone, it's just not going to happen. And I'm pretty sure that most folks would be highly skeptical of how much data the 'state' was collecting on any such endeavor anyway.
It's no secret that the politicians here in the U.S. are the best that money can buy.... Now if the citizens that voted them into office could only figure out a way to get legislation passed that forces them to represent the interests of their constituents, instead of serving the interests of their campaign contributors in order to take advantage of their constituents, we'd be making some much needed progress towards what the original 'Congress' intended.
The Beta doesn't work on Linux Mint 13, due to all sorts of issues with needing a specific version of Flash, or messages about vendor drivers.
And then there's the fubar that clicking the Steam launcher that was put on my desktop by the beta opens in Chrome, and Steam only seems to want to work properly with Firefox, which is installed on my system, but was not selected by the installer.
If you get past all of those hurdles, and get steam running under Firefox, you quickly discover that almost all "Free" games (for trying out Steam Beta on LInux) are "not available for your platform".
Did get one Free game to agree to install, but Steam indicated there would be a download time of over 3-1/2 hours for the installation (on cable internet mind you!)
Uhhhhh... No thanks....
Maybe a few more betas later this will be a workable platform.
First Impressions? Not ready for even sub-prime time...