Thats going to be a pretty long wait, considering the amount of crap these assholes are able to shell out every 2 days.
There's got to be something we can all do to kick those asses -without getting into contact with they're personal robocops-. we need IDEAS!!!
We've got to mount a popular counter attack. M$, SO, hell, EVERY company can get a great load of media contact. Linux just has very big books in bookstores and lots of webpages rambling about source-code (nothing the normal computer user wants to deal with). Here again, need IDEAS!
There's a major lack of communication, and SO are taking advantage of that. They fling watever shit they want to the media, who eat it up and spit it out shiny.
We can't let this mad man go around threatening lawsuits to people who dont comply with an obviously crooked License.
The fact that the behaviour of a limiting sequence doesn't determine a particular behaviour of a limit is really interesting! But does it apply to limiting eveything over 0?
It's a question about survival of values. They can't dissapear just because they are drowned in a large string of numbers which don't seem to have an end.
Yes, the imaging with infinity is a bit flawed, but here's a logical run thru...
1/10 = 0? no
1/90909 = 0? no
1//(10^infinity) = 0? no
but it's pretty close...
why would the inverse, 0.99999 = 1 if it just isn't. there's that really smally thingy that isn't there.
Does 1/infinity = 0? no. It's allmost non-existant, but there's something happening. something keeps getting divided.
the same with 0.9999.. it doesn't equal 1 because there's a little something missing, the same value as 1/infinity.
Slashdot Mirror
Thats going to be a pretty long wait, considering the amount of crap these assholes are able to shell out every 2 days.
There's got to be something we can all do to kick those asses -without getting into contact with they're personal robocops-. we need IDEAS!!!
We've got to mount a popular counter attack. M$, SO, hell, EVERY company can get a great load of media contact. Linux just has very big books in bookstores and lots of webpages rambling about source-code (nothing the normal computer user wants to deal with). Here again, need IDEAS!
There's a major lack of communication, and SO are taking advantage of that. They fling watever shit they want to the media, who eat it up and spit it out shiny.
We can't let this mad man go around threatening lawsuits to people who dont comply with an obviously crooked License.
What can we do until march??
I leave reality distortion fields to steve.
1. Attack everybody you know .. . .. p p p .rrr. . .
.. ..... PRISON!!!!!
2. Claim you're doing what you got to do (voices?)
3. P
3. .
3.
The fact that the behaviour of a limiting sequence doesn't determine a particular behaviour of a limit is really interesting! But does it apply to limiting eveything over 0?
Is that .9 repeating? If so, there's a 100% possibility of 1 + 1 = 1.9999...
should read this:
Is that .9 repeating? If so, there's a 99.999...% possibility of 1 + 1 = 1.9999...
1/90909 = 0? no
1/(10^infinity) = 0? no
but it's pretty close...
why would the inverse, 0.99999 = 1 if it just isn't. there's that really smally thingy that isn't there.
Yes, the imaging with infinity is a bit flawed, but here's a logical run thru...
1/10 = 0? no
1/90909 = 0? no
1//(10^infinity) = 0? no
but it's pretty close...
why would the inverse, 0.99999 = 1 if it just isn't. there's that really smally thingy that isn't there.
Does 1/infinity = 0? no. It's allmost non-existant, but there's something happening. something keeps getting divided. the same with 0.9999.. it doesn't equal 1 because there's a little something missing, the same value as 1/infinity.