They will. In fact, Elon stated that all the difficult problems were surpassed, another test launch probably won't be needed, and the next launch will have actual payload.
But doesn't that just mean that the formal driving sim was seen more as a game, instead of a sim? I.e. the "it's only a game" though bleeds into the normally serious situation. They should do real-life driving for comparison instead.
Not to mention that 2880x659 pixel 826KB jpeg hogging bandwidth at the top of the page, and that the javascript terms acceptance click-through accepts "Cancel" as well as "OK".
Not every country has the same special characters, making these very nation-specific. Add to the fact that unless you have a special keyboard, entering these characters is annoying, at best.
Did you know that it's possible to embed links to other pages in HTML? It's actually fairly popular these days!
Like I've said elsewhere, it does solve the problem for timestamps, but not calendering apps, since they need to specify future dates. It seems that the issue with calendering apps is not about actual time at all, however, but instead entirely about local time. I.e. we want the meeting to be at 9:00 am, no matter what that really means in terms of universal time. This creates problems. I suggest that calender apps should make a difference between events that need to stay local, and times that need to be fixed wrt. UTC.
Note especially the better details in the baby's collar, and faint wisps of hair on the right forehead, which are distorted or gone in the GREYCstoration. Note also the colored noise which is completely removed by Neat Image. In short: better details throughout.
This is not to say that GREYC can't do better, though. That depends on how much it can be tweaked.
Nope, the noise that's left after subtracting a dark frame is still not random. The noise will have certain properties across the entire picture, depending on shutter speed. So you analyse one part of the picture that has as few subject details as possible, and then you can remove that same noise over the whole picture.
Mine is working without problems. Have you contacted support again? Looking at your forum post and the bug tracker, I can't find your issue there at all...
Slashdot Mirror
They will. In fact, Elon stated that all the difficult problems were surpassed, another test launch probably won't be needed, and the next launch will have actual payload.
No, they forgot.
It has some advantages: it's portable, and it has plausible deniability (hidden partitions).
Astalavista compels you.
But doesn't that just mean that the formal driving sim was seen more as a game, instead of a sim? I.e. the "it's only a game" though bleeds into the normally serious situation. They should do real-life driving for comparison instead.
In the future, they will be semicolons; properly used.
Not to mention that 2880x659 pixel 826KB jpeg hogging bandwidth at the top of the page, and that the javascript terms acceptance click-through accepts "Cancel" as well as "OK".
I won't Allow that.
Such mail clients deserve to die already, IMHO. Not that I want to pressure anyone, but really, life and requirements move on.
Really, kimchi? I'd think bosintang is what repulses people.
Having a subject like "MOD PARENT DOWN TROLL" is a blatant troll itself.
Like I've said elsewhere, it does solve the problem for timestamps, but not calendering apps, since they need to specify future dates. It seems that the issue with calendering apps is not about actual time at all, however, but instead entirely about local time. I.e. we want the meeting to be at 9:00 am, no matter what that really means in terms of universal time. This creates problems. I suggest that calender apps should make a difference between events that need to stay local, and times that need to be fixed wrt. UTC.
Don't tell me you're timestamping with local time? Always use UTC and convert to local time on the fly, it avoids all these problems.
In fact, that's not usually what's meant by image stabilisation at all. It's just freezing motion.
Note especially the better details in the baby's collar, and faint wisps of hair on the right forehead, which are distorted or gone in the GREYCstoration. Note also the colored noise which is completely removed by Neat Image. In short: better details throughout.
This is not to say that GREYC can't do better, though. That depends on how much it can be tweaked.
Nope, the noise that's left after subtracting a dark frame is still not random. The noise will have certain properties across the entire picture, depending on shutter speed. So you analyse one part of the picture that has as few subject details as possible, and then you can remove that same noise over the whole picture.
Reading the review, I thought of a school project gone haywire.
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
Mine is working without problems. Have you contacted support again? Looking at your forum post and the bug tracker, I can't find your issue there at all...