Just for reference, by saying this, you've made it clear you don't have much experience.
The problem you kids have as developers is that you think using package managers to download and do the dirty work automatically for you is a good thing.
Its not until you cost a business a bunch of money because your package manager did a bunch of stupid crap, or they deleted the version you're using and dependent on that you learn why the rest of us don't. Occasionally a developer will figure it out after they realize they spend 80% of their time updating their project to match changes to the constantly updating packages they depend on rather than using one thats known to work reliably and sticking with it.
I won't even go into the fact that you think code completion makes you a better developer while ignoring that you don't actually know what the methods you use do because you never bothered to look at the documentation for them... you just happened to notice a name that looked like what you wanted. God, dealing with developers like that has cost me ridiculous amounts of time in my career, and while code completion can be useful to a skilled developer, for the other 99.999999% of developers, its way more of a problem than any benefit that comes out of it.
In short, your post just shows that you're a newb.
Compared to chemical propellants? I don't think so.
Unless they get the efficiency up then the fuel might take up more space. That said, being liquid,
I'm fairly certain the nuclear reactor that powers the guns and the ship won't be that big of a problem. They don't do it on diesel.
Armor is more or less worthless against that sort of attack.
Thats why the strengthen the keel... 40 years ago.
I'd keep going, but I'm just blown away by how you got to +5 on this. You don't seem to know anything at all about you're talking about. You're mixing and matching things in ways that makes them all simply completely false statements.
It doesn't apply. If you pay closer attention to what he said, he's going to let them get by with so many things that this is effectively toothless.
Breaking bundling and separating content provider from data provider are a must if you actually want fair play.
All that'll happen now is that Comcast will manage their network equally. Low rates outside their network so Netflix sucks, but their cable service on the internal network will function most of the time. And of course you'll have to buy that and phone service as well.
There really is no good in these statements, it's just lip service to shut the public up.
advance the idea that it HAS this authority in the first place (which it arguably does not)
Just shut up. You're so unbelievable wrong that its mind numbing you continued the rest of your diatribe. The FAA has had, since its inception, mandate BY LAW OF CONGRESS to control ALL airspace, from the ground up. You and people like you need to get through your thick skulls that just because you read from some random guy on some random website that they don't doesn't make it magically true.
A toy helicopter hovering 50ft above your home or business is NOT in the "navigable airspace"
At no point does the FAA ever refer to anything as 'navigable airspace'. You're showing exactly how little you know on the subject matter. Again, just shut up.
it's perfectly safe as a hobby but requires fees and licenses and oversight if the exact same person operates the exact same toy in the exact same way and uses it to take the exact same photos for profit
It is NOT perfectly safe as a hobby, but as a hobby there will be a limited number of people doing it so the damage is likely to be little, few and far between. As SOON AS THERE iS FINANCIAL MOTIVATION, a metric fuckton of people trying to get in on the ground floor without having the slightest idea what they are doing will jump on it, and do stupid shit, and behave in utterly stupid ways, trying to get money for it.
Commercial use doesn't make quads or any other RC aircraft less safe. Commercial use makes the owners/pilots/drivers fucking morons, thats a fact you can see in every other industry on the planet. Its the same reason we regulate taxis and companies like Uber should be beaten down with a large stick.
Commercial aviation can be adequately protected from bot "professional" and amateur drone use by simply banning drones from operating within a fixed distance of any airport or above 10K feet MSL (or by any similarly easy simple basic method).
Sigh, just for reference, most of the air traffic in the USA occurs below 10k feet. Pretty much all commercial airlines travel above 10k feet, all jets do since you have to stay below 250 knots below 10k feet, but the majority of the aircraft in the air are small private aircraft flying out of countless uncontrolled airports without using ATC all over the nation.
The community of droneusers/hobbyists/geeks/propellerheads/whatever NEED to get after their members of congress on this stuff NOW or the FAA will get in bed with big business and make sure that only big businesses will be able to make drones and operate them for profit.
I've been flying RC aircraft for almost 30 years now, I've been flying fully autonomous quads for about the last 8. I FULLY SUPPORT the FAA regulating this. We were able to deal with the FAA just fine before flight controllers made it so any moron with 0 skill could keep an aircraft in the air, which means all the morons who do things like fly above crowds of people, into buildings and over the white house lawn are now able to do so. Before these people had RC aircraft, we got along just fine because there was a barrier to entry.
Along with that, RC aircraft HAVE ALWAYS BEEN REGULATED WHEN FLYING FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Its been a regulation since before I was born, they aren't doing anything new, you're just clueless and don't know about the existing regulation.
People like you are the problem the FAA is trying to deal with. Utter ignorance causes a whole bunch of problems because you don't realize all the stupid shit you do.
And lets add, to 'avoid maintenance' you just add a bunch of extra spares from the start. Thats just stupid, you over build ridiculously in order to not have to spend 10 minutes swapping a drive out. Totally cost effective... if you're sending a probe out into space. In which case, you're going to want better than fives 9s, so try again.
I worry a lot less about losing data than I do corrupting data and not knowing it.
But hey, congratulations, you've learned about RAID mirrors with lots of copies and learned how to apply basic, well understood engineering principals to it.
Guess what, some of us were aware of this years ago, some others aware of it longer than you've probably been alive. Its been known my entire life, thats for sure, so thats at least 40 years.
That would be negative pressure, since you're sucking air out.
Also, related to the summary (not your comment):
The leading theory points to the country's primitive ATM cards. Along with Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, and not many other countries, the U.S. doesn't require its plastic to contain an encryption chip, so stealing cards remains an effective, nonviolent way to get at the cash in an ATM.
The theory is flat out wrong. If you still the ATM card, you have the encryption chip. So adding a chip to the card doesn't change this.
The encryption chip prevents CLONING the card, and has absolutely no effect what so ever on stealing the card. In fact, with the encryption chip, you must steal it to use it rather than whats done currently which is just cloning the card without the owner knowing.
difference between a quality DVD upscale and a Bluray
You lost all credibility when you said upscale. You just showed that you don't understand that you've been caught in a marketing gimmick.
And... pretty much everyone can tell difference if you put them side by side, its just that most people will never see them side by side because they have far better things to do than sit around jerking off about the video quality... like actually watching the video.
Only if it saves 30-40 percent more than before the vacs was used.
Instead what happens is you create drug resistant virus that are 50-60 more likely to infect, so cutting it down by 30-40 percent is still higher than it was before you started. Net Loss.
Considering recent studies show that cancer is more likely to be caused by genetics than smoking... you might want to adjust your ignorant holier than thou attitude and learn how science actually works rather than blindly believing shit you've been indoctrinated with and being too stupid to think for yourself.
Hint: Science is the opposite of what you think it is. Science is actually questioning what you think you know, not believing what someone told you in D.A.R.E.
First off, when did Google start asking permission BEFORE it just did privacy invading shit?
Second, how many times have you (Schmidt) basically said you didn't give a fuck about peoples privacy or their wishes and that you were going to get your way eventually anyway?
Lets be realistic here Schmidt, you don't mean a word of what you just said. What you mean is that you want devices in every room analyzing everything everyone does in an attempt to figure out how to sell them to advertisers for a higher rate. THAT IS WHAT YOU MEAN.
If it was, it wouldn't be about UFS, it'd be about ZFS.
UFS is still fine for small installations on embedded systems, but for any thing of any size, you should be using ZFS. Its superior in every way other than memory usage.
Android is the antithesis of privacy. You might as well be looking for GNU/OS X.
Androids entire existence is to gather your private info for Google. There is literally no other reason ite exists. If your not ok with that, you should probably start looking for alternatives.
You'll be more likely to use lava to chill your drinks than get privacy from Android.
Perhaps, or it could have been there for protection during the landing sequence.
And its likely that without the solar panels extended, there wasn't going to be much use of having the antenna available due to a rapidly depleting power source.
Not everyone wants to follow you're ridiculous upgrade cycle. Example: I like Google Chrome, I won't use it because its a pain in the ass to stop it from auto-updating, and if you stop it once, a month later it randomly starts upgrading itself again.
Why does Google think what its doing is any better than the people who sell exploits on the black market? They aren't asking for cash directly for them, but they are trying to hurt the competition.
Issue #128 might not even be a bug depending on your perspective, as noted in the report! The one that is 'the more serious of the two', WTF? And its not like MS hasn't patched it... they've created a patch, that caused some compatibility issues so they delayed the patch so the compat issues can be resolved... So Google publishes the exploit code just to be dicks about it.
The less serious... lets a user view another users power control settings... Seriously?
This is just Google mud slinging. Its starting to look more like Google is a politician running for elected office than being a good citizen.
Google: You're starting to look like an even bigger douche than Microsoft.
Slashdot Mirror
better package architecture (Nuget)
Just for reference, by saying this, you've made it clear you don't have much experience.
The problem you kids have as developers is that you think using package managers to download and do the dirty work automatically for you is a good thing.
Its not until you cost a business a bunch of money because your package manager did a bunch of stupid crap, or they deleted the version you're using and dependent on that you learn why the rest of us don't. Occasionally a developer will figure it out after they realize they spend 80% of their time updating their project to match changes to the constantly updating packages they depend on rather than using one thats known to work reliably and sticking with it.
I won't even go into the fact that you think code completion makes you a better developer while ignoring that you don't actually know what the methods you use do because you never bothered to look at the documentation for them ... you just happened to notice a name that looked like what you wanted. God, dealing with developers like that has cost me ridiculous amounts of time in my career, and while code completion can be useful to a skilled developer, for the other 99.999999% of developers, its way more of a problem than any benefit that comes out of it.
In short, your post just shows that you're a newb.
Everyone knows if you have money you can buy power.
So then we'll just make the UK the 52 state.
but railguns are fearfully inefficient.
Compared to chemical propellants? I don't think so.
Unless they get the efficiency up then the fuel might take up more space. That said, being liquid,
I'm fairly certain the nuclear reactor that powers the guns and the ship won't be that big of a problem. They don't do it on diesel.
Armor is more or less worthless against that sort of attack.
Thats why the strengthen the keel ... 40 years ago.
I'd keep going, but I'm just blown away by how you got to +5 on this. You don't seem to know anything at all about you're talking about. You're mixing and matching things in ways that makes them all simply completely false statements.
It doesn't apply. If you pay closer attention to what he said, he's going to let them get by with so many things that this is effectively toothless.
Breaking bundling and separating content provider from data provider are a must if you actually want fair play.
All that'll happen now is that Comcast will manage their network equally. Low rates outside their network so Netflix sucks, but their cable service on the internal network will function most of the time. And of course you'll have to buy that and phone service as well.
There really is no good in these statements, it's just lip service to shut the public up.
Sigh, another idiot.
advance the idea that it HAS this authority in the first place (which it arguably does not)
Just shut up. You're so unbelievable wrong that its mind numbing you continued the rest of your diatribe. The FAA has had, since its inception, mandate BY LAW OF CONGRESS to control ALL airspace, from the ground up. You and people like you need to get through your thick skulls that just because you read from some random guy on some random website that they don't doesn't make it magically true.
A toy helicopter hovering 50ft above your home or business is NOT in the "navigable airspace"
At no point does the FAA ever refer to anything as 'navigable airspace'. You're showing exactly how little you know on the subject matter. Again, just shut up.
it's perfectly safe as a hobby but requires fees and licenses and oversight if the exact same person operates the exact same toy in the exact same way and uses it to take the exact same photos for profit
It is NOT perfectly safe as a hobby, but as a hobby there will be a limited number of people doing it so the damage is likely to be little, few and far between. As SOON AS THERE iS FINANCIAL MOTIVATION, a metric fuckton of people trying to get in on the ground floor without having the slightest idea what they are doing will jump on it, and do stupid shit, and behave in utterly stupid ways, trying to get money for it.
Commercial use doesn't make quads or any other RC aircraft less safe. Commercial use makes the owners/pilots/drivers fucking morons, thats a fact you can see in every other industry on the planet. Its the same reason we regulate taxis and companies like Uber should be beaten down with a large stick.
Commercial aviation can be adequately protected from bot "professional" and amateur drone use by simply banning drones from operating within a fixed distance of any airport or above 10K feet MSL (or by any similarly easy simple basic method).
Sigh, just for reference, most of the air traffic in the USA occurs below 10k feet. Pretty much all commercial airlines travel above 10k feet, all jets do since you have to stay below 250 knots below 10k feet, but the majority of the aircraft in the air are small private aircraft flying out of countless uncontrolled airports without using ATC all over the nation.
The community of droneusers/hobbyists/geeks/propellerheads/whatever NEED to get after their members of congress on this stuff NOW or the FAA will get in bed with big business and make sure that only big businesses will be able to make drones and operate them for profit.
I've been flying RC aircraft for almost 30 years now, I've been flying fully autonomous quads for about the last 8. I FULLY SUPPORT the FAA regulating this. We were able to deal with the FAA just fine before flight controllers made it so any moron with 0 skill could keep an aircraft in the air, which means all the morons who do things like fly above crowds of people, into buildings and over the white house lawn are now able to do so. Before these people had RC aircraft, we got along just fine because there was a barrier to entry.
Along with that, RC aircraft HAVE ALWAYS BEEN REGULATED WHEN FLYING FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. Its been a regulation since before I was born, they aren't doing anything new, you're just clueless and don't know about the existing regulation.
People like you are the problem the FAA is trying to deal with. Utter ignorance causes a whole bunch of problems because you don't realize all the stupid shit you do.
And lets add, to 'avoid maintenance' you just add a bunch of extra spares from the start. Thats just stupid, you over build ridiculously in order to not have to spend 10 minutes swapping a drive out. Totally cost effective ... if you're sending a probe out into space. In which case, you're going to want better than fives 9s, so try again.
I worry a lot less about losing data than I do corrupting data and not knowing it.
But hey, congratulations, you've learned about RAID mirrors with lots of copies and learned how to apply basic, well understood engineering principals to it.
Guess what, some of us were aware of this years ago, some others aware of it longer than you've probably been alive. Its been known my entire life, thats for sure, so thats at least 40 years.
heh: s/still the ATM/steal the ATM/
That would be negative pressure, since you're sucking air out.
Also, related to the summary (not your comment):
The leading theory points to the country's primitive ATM cards. Along with Mongolia, Papua New Guinea, and not many other countries, the U.S. doesn't require its plastic to contain an encryption chip, so stealing cards remains an effective, nonviolent way to get at the cash in an ATM.
The theory is flat out wrong. If you still the ATM card, you have the encryption chip. So adding a chip to the card doesn't change this.
The encryption chip prevents CLONING the card, and has absolutely no effect what so ever on stealing the card. In fact, with the encryption chip, you must steal it to use it rather than whats done currently which is just cloning the card without the owner knowing.
Way to totally misunderstand the problem guys.
What porn site uses Flash still? The biggest ones all switched to HTML5 compatible some time ago.
difference between a quality DVD upscale and a Bluray
You lost all credibility when you said upscale. You just showed that you don't understand that you've been caught in a marketing gimmick.
And ... pretty much everyone can tell difference if you put them side by side, its just that most people will never see them side by side because they have far better things to do than sit around jerking off about the video quality ... like actually watching the video.
You're doing it completely wrong. You need to get a clue about viewing distance and the ratio between display size and it.
You're one of those guys who thinks he has this kick ass awesome setup because you made it bigger, but really, you just made it shittier.
You should at least get the most basic of clues from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...
At no point should your display be larger than the distance you're viewing it from, thats just retarded.
Only if it saves 30-40 percent more than before the vacs was used.
Instead what happens is you create drug resistant virus that are 50-60 more likely to infect, so cutting it down by 30-40 percent is still higher than it was before you started. Net Loss.
And hint: No one has 'no immunity at all'
Considering recent studies show that cancer is more likely to be caused by genetics than smoking ... you might want to adjust your ignorant holier than thou attitude and learn how science actually works rather than blindly believing shit you've been indoctrinated with and being too stupid to think for yourself.
Hint: Science is the opposite of what you think it is. Science is actually questioning what you think you know, not believing what someone told you in D.A.R.E.
And with your permission and all of that
Could you be more of an asshole?
First off, when did Google start asking permission BEFORE it just did privacy invading shit?
Second, how many times have you (Schmidt) basically said you didn't give a fuck about peoples privacy or their wishes and that you were going to get your way eventually anyway?
Lets be realistic here Schmidt, you don't mean a word of what you just said. What you mean is that you want devices in every room analyzing everything everyone does in an attempt to figure out how to sell them to advertisers for a higher rate. THAT IS WHAT YOU MEAN.
So basically you want Apple and Microsoft to keep supporting your crusty old hardware with new features that it doesn't support anyway?
Both Apple and Microsoft provide 'support' longer than pretty much any other software maker on the planet, including any Linux vendor you can name.
Get a clue fanboy.
Perhaps the problem is that people who use G+ post things when they have something to of value say, not when they took a shit.
My circles are pretty active, no, I don't know what they had for lunch though.
Less than the mess that is otherwise know as FireFox
If it was, it wouldn't be about UFS, it'd be about ZFS.
UFS is still fine for small installations on embedded systems, but for any thing of any size, you should be using ZFS. Its superior in every way other than memory usage.
Android is the antithesis of privacy. You might as well be looking for GNU/OS X.
Androids entire existence is to gather your private info for Google. There is literally no other reason ite exists. If your not ok with that, you should probably start looking for alternatives.
You'll be more likely to use lava to chill your drinks than get privacy from Android.
Yea, but the latest OS X runs on hardware that can hardware emulate yor PowerPC at twice the speed your used to.
I'm sure your Mac can emulate x86 fast enough to run windows 3.1 like a champ to.
But let's stop pretending that your setup is ideal, sustainable or more importantly workable for others.
Does anything else really need to be said?
You've established that you think you don't need actual court approval just like Bush.
Now go fuck yourself and take everyone who thinks like you along to n the sit and spin.
Perhaps, or it could have been there for protection during the landing sequence.
And its likely that without the solar panels extended, there wasn't going to be much use of having the antenna available due to a rapidly depleting power source.
Not everyone wants to follow you're ridiculous upgrade cycle. Example: I like Google Chrome, I won't use it because its a pain in the ass to stop it from auto-updating, and if you stop it once, a month later it randomly starts upgrading itself again.
Why does Google think what its doing is any better than the people who sell exploits on the black market? They aren't asking for cash directly for them, but they are trying to hurt the competition.
Issue #128 might not even be a bug depending on your perspective, as noted in the report! The one that is 'the more serious of the two', WTF? And its not like MS hasn't patched it ... they've created a patch, that caused some compatibility issues so they delayed the patch so the compat issues can be resolved ... So Google publishes the exploit code just to be dicks about it.
The less serious ... lets a user view another users power control settings ... Seriously?
This is just Google mud slinging. Its starting to look more like Google is a politician running for elected office than being a good citizen.
Google: You're starting to look like an even bigger douche than Microsoft.