Slashdot Mirror


User: 110010001000

110010001000's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,610
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,610

  1. I'm so confused.

  2. About time on Google Subpoenaed Over Data Privacy, Antitrust in Missouri (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Google and their ilk are data collectors and trackers. They are not your friend. Go Missouri!

  3. Re:I'm Shocked, Shocked I Tell You! on Munich Council: To Hell With Linux, We're Going Full Windows in 2020 (theregister.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    You must be kidding. With everything moving to the cloud, the desktop OS becomes more irrelevant every year. You will start seeing other OS making inroads over Windows as this continues. This is more about some sales people bribing ("lobbying") the right people.

  4. Does this mean WWIII is coming? Don't mention the War.

  5. Re:Why is this even possible? on Huddle's 'Highly Secure' Work Tool Exposed KPMG And BBC Files (bbc.com) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    +1 Insightful. They "sprinted" right off the cliff and fell through the Clouds.

  6. Re:Why is this even possible? on Huddle's 'Highly Secure' Work Tool Exposed KPMG And BBC Files (bbc.com) · · Score: 0

    Software like this is usually designed by Millennials who have no concept of doing things right.

  7. Re:What happens when.. on Hackers Say They've Broken Face ID a Week After iPhone X Release (wired.com) · · Score: 5, Funny

    You use your passcode and stop dating NFL players.

  8. The reason FaceID exists it to collect biometric data for Apple. It isn't to improve end user security. Silly people.

  9. No computer running a general purpose OS is secure. None. Security is the antithesis of general purpose computers.

  10. Re:The Smithsonian, brought to you by Exxon on Magazine For Museums Publishes Its 2040 Issue -- 23 Years Early (aam-us.org) · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Most people who run museums have no clue about science for technology. Neither do the people who claim we are going to be living in the clouds of Venus.

  11. Re:Should YT Kids require YT Red? on YouTube Says It Will Crack Down On Bizarre Videos Targeting Children (theverge.com) · · Score: 2

    You must be kidding. Google is making billions off of ads and selling your (and your kids) data. It is already fully "funded"

  12. Re:Google, our saviour on Google Working To Remove MINIX-Based ME From Intel Platforms (tomshardware.com) · · Score: 1

    Well digital technology progress has stopped, so there is no holding anything back. The computer you use 10, 20, 50 years from now will be very similar to the one you are using right now. Because, physics.

  13. Re:Queuing for food is for fools on Google To Add Restaurant Wait Times To Google Search, Maps (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    Um no. A restaurant that isn't busy is *usually* inferior to a busy restaurant. The reason you see queues in American restaurants is that some restaurants don't take reservations, or people show up without reservations and are willing to wait.

  14. Re:Anyone familiar with the technology on Alphabet Is Finally Taking the Driver Out of Some of Its Driverless Cars (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    No there aren't. Hype. You probably think "AI" is right around the corner too, along with a Mars rocket.

  15. Re:This is coming a lot faster than most think on Alphabet Is Finally Taking the Driver Out of Some of Its Driverless Cars (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    "the most they are going to be able to do is hit a button for emergency stop" Says who? The hypesters.

  16. Re:The real danger of so-called 'AI': on Hawking: AI Could Be 'Worst Event in the History of Our Civilization' (usatoday.com) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    THIS is finally an insightful post. He is right: the current approach is a dead end and Moores Law ending will kill it even faster.

  17. Re:Fails to mention... on Alphabet Is Finally Taking the Driver Out of Some of Its Driverless Cars (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    "At first, those passengers will be accompanied in the back seat by a Waymo employee, but eventually they will travel alone, although they will be able to hit a button to stop the car."

    Um yeah.

  18. Re:This is coming a lot faster than most think on Alphabet Is Finally Taking the Driver Out of Some of Its Driverless Cars (recode.net) · · Score: 1

    Who says the technology has advanced at a rapid clip? The hypesters that run these companies. These cars will still have employees in them.

  19. Fails to mention... on Alphabet Is Finally Taking the Driver Out of Some of Its Driverless Cars (recode.net) · · Score: 0

    ...there will be at least ONE employee in the vehicle at all times. More hype.

  20. So basically we are calling any algorithm "AI" now. Cool.

  21. So they are holding it wrong?

  22. That is 1/50th of my annual salary working in IT In Silicon Valley!

  23. Correct. They are both alcoholics.

  24. "Yes" is positive. Do it!

  25. Your TV and Roku are both closed source. You have no idea what either one are doing, so you might as well let etiher one do whatever they want.