It might be good to score each one of those paths and discard the worst ones. It is similar to how evolution works. Maybe we could call it "evolutionary genetic algorithms"? I should write a paper about that.
Wow, so computers are really bad at calculating individual decision trees that are all dependent on each other? But if they weren't they would be AI. Because that is what organic-style intelligence is: massively parallel decision trees.
Total BS. What you are calling "weak AI" would just mean "computer programs". We are talking about AI, DEEP learning Neural Nets. They are learning. Deep. And they can play Chess and Go. We are talking about different things.
Of course I watch science fiction. That his how I know that AI is real and we will have a colony on Mars soon. It doesn't require any effort either: just sit back and wait. Progress is inevitable!
AI is here now. How many Chess and Grandmaster Go players are out of a job because of AI? All of them. The number of job applications for those positions have plummeted. I did a quick search on Dice and I couldn't find a single job listing for either Chess or Go players.
Why not "test" them on something else than life-support machines? Why the endless examples of playing Go and Chess and recipes and playing video games?
If AI systems really worked, why would you apply them to creating recipes, playing Go, and playing Chess? I mean, these morons inputted 40,000 recipes in some form and trained a NN against it. Why? Is there no practical use?
There are no legitimate concerns. The longs have an incentive to do the same to hype a stock up. Ridiculous. Short sellers can be easily disproved, unless their concerns are valid.
Um, yes it does. Tesla is a bubble stock. So is Apple as are Amazon. Their stocks would be ever more overvalued if shorts didn't exist. Tech is currently in a bubble right now, but that bubble is popping. The bubble would be much larger. The price of Apple products has nothing to do with stocks. You don't know what you are talking about.
Throw in some simulated annealing and you will be totally cutting edge in AI.
That is the great thing about Moore's Law: because it exists all things will be possible in the future. We just need to sit back and wait.
I'll take 300 trips a year with tourists and then retire and live near a beach in Cebu and take tourists on trips to see whale sharks in my free time.
So true. I just read about one yesterday that could suggest recipes based on leftovers.
I think they can. I have a ton of old computers in the attic.
It might be good to score each one of those paths and discard the worst ones. It is similar to how evolution works. Maybe we could call it "evolutionary genetic algorithms"? I should write a paper about that.
Genetic Algorithms are so 1990s. We have moved on to "deep learning" now. Get with the times!
Exactly. fMRI. That is a real thing too. Totally not a scam.
Wow, so computers are really bad at calculating individual decision trees that are all dependent on each other? But if they weren't they would be AI. Because that is what organic-style intelligence is: massively parallel decision trees.
Total BS. What you are calling "weak AI" would just mean "computer programs". We are talking about AI, DEEP learning Neural Nets. They are learning. Deep. And they can play Chess and Go. We are talking about different things.
Wow. Genius. So all we need to do is threaten to turn off the computer an exponential number of times and it will eventually become AI?
Of course I watch science fiction. That his how I know that AI is real and we will have a colony on Mars soon. It doesn't require any effort either: just sit back and wait. Progress is inevitable!
No need for that. We will have Tesla's in Hyper Tunnels instead. Why go up, when you can just go underground?
AI is here now. How many Chess and Grandmaster Go players are out of a job because of AI? All of them. The number of job applications for those positions have plummeted. I did a quick search on Dice and I couldn't find a single job listing for either Chess or Go players.
So restrict the whale sharks from visiting except for one month when there are a few swimmers?
All the locals have to live off of whale sharks?
So they should sell the whale sharks to get money?
Kill all the whale sharks?
Why not "test" them on something else than life-support machines? Why the endless examples of playing Go and Chess and recipes and playing video games?
If AI systems really worked, why would you apply them to creating recipes, playing Go, and playing Chess? I mean, these morons inputted 40,000 recipes in some form and trained a NN against it. Why? Is there no practical use?
Just shut up. The AI bubble needs to pop soon. This is ridiculous.
There are no legitimate concerns. The longs have an incentive to do the same to hype a stock up. Ridiculous. Short sellers can be easily disproved, unless their concerns are valid.
Um, yes it does. Tesla is a bubble stock. So is Apple as are Amazon. Their stocks would be ever more overvalued if shorts didn't exist. Tech is currently in a bubble right now, but that bubble is popping. The bubble would be much larger. The price of Apple products has nothing to do with stocks. You don't know what you are talking about.
We have AI now, so this kind of thing isn't possible because computers are intelligent. Must be user error.
The taxpayers don't want it either. If Musk wants to go, he can spend his Paypal money to do it.