Google seems to have developed a successful advertising model that is a lot harder to block, is not annoying or obtrusive, and is relevent.
I think instead it is the end of doubleclick - and I'm thankful for that!
The link ( http://www.boingboing.net/2004/11/06/alien_v_preda tor_scr.html )
to the info on Peter Briggs has porn ads, for those to whom it matters.
Couldn't you have warned us?
As I said, it is NOT there by default, where as in Mozilla it is. Therefore, it is more complicated.
Regarding your condescencion, I understand how to do the extra steps just fine and don't need to be talked down to.
My simple point was that it was different.
Things Firefox does differently or does not have that Mozilla does (from my experience):
* Bookmarking groups of tabs and then opening them all with a single click - Mozilla yes, Firefox no.
* Opening new blank tabs with a button - Mozilla yes, Firefox no.
To me these are features I use very often and that I can't use in Firefox.
I hope they continue Mozilla.
Thanks for listening.
Here is what I get...
MSN Search is temporarily unable to process your request.
Please try again in a few minutes.
EID: f:2114719238 - 1041:1041:10004:1059
HC: 71d61b16
They probably need to reboot!
"Many of the Microsoft Administrators I work with argued the more user friendly Linux becomes, the more vulnerable it becomes. "
Ummm... what makes a Microsoft Admininstrator the authority on vulernability and usability?
Slashdot Mirror
who cares? Just use a different site!
They already did this once ...
Google seems to have developed a successful advertising model that is a lot harder to block, is not annoying or obtrusive, and is relevent. I think instead it is the end of doubleclick - and I'm thankful for that!
http://www.techweb.com/wire/ebiz/55301475 http://beta.toolbar.msn.com/
The link ( http://www.boingboing.net/2004/11/06/alien_v_preda tor_scr.html )
to the info on Peter Briggs has porn ads, for those to whom it matters.
Couldn't you have warned us?
Because of the open market and competition, we can't end up having just one system. It is a sympton of the very freedom we are voting for!
As I said, it is NOT there by default, where as in Mozilla it is. Therefore, it is more complicated. Regarding your condescencion, I understand how to do the extra steps just fine and don't need to be talked down to. My simple point was that it was different.
Both of those sound much more complicated than how mozilla does it. Why can't it be just as simple?
Things Firefox does differently or does not have that Mozilla does (from my experience): * Bookmarking groups of tabs and then opening them all with a single click - Mozilla yes, Firefox no. * Opening new blank tabs with a button - Mozilla yes, Firefox no. To me these are features I use very often and that I can't use in Firefox. I hope they continue Mozilla. Thanks for listening.
results: Sorry, no results were found containing "Internet Explorer exploits" Of course not!
Here is what I get ...
MSN Search is temporarily unable to process your request.
Please try again in a few minutes.
EID: f:2114719238 - 1041:1041:10004:1059
HC: 71d61b16
They probably need to reboot!
"Many of the Microsoft Administrators I work with argued the more user friendly Linux becomes, the more vulnerable it becomes. " Ummm... what makes a Microsoft Admininstrator the authority on vulernability and usability?
see http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ The resolution is a bit better. For an even better image, see http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030824.html