Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
(*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) All you did was copy text from the linked article
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
( ) You utterly failed to comprehend the article or article blurb and made entirely irrelevant comments
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
(*) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
(*) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) All you did was copy text from the linked article
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
( ) You utterly failed to comprehend the article or article blurb and made entirely irrelevant comments
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
(*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) All you did was copy text from the linked article
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
( ) You utterly failed to comprehend the article or article blurb and made entirely irrelevant comments
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[ ] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[*] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) All you did was copy text from the linked article
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
(*) You utterly failed to comprehend the article or article blurb and made entirely irrelevant comments
[*] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
(*) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
(*) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) All you did was copy text from the linked article
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
(*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) All you did was copy text from the linked article
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[ ] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[*] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
(*) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[*] Additional comments:
Sir Haxalot is a cheap karma whore. Moderators, please reconsider moderating him up in the future.:)
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made an MPAA/RIAA joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
(*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[*] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
(*) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
#include #include <winsock2.h> #include <windows.h> #include <process.h> #include <string.h> #include <winbase.h>...so how exactly are we supposed to "compile under Linux"?
No. It's funny how you think you are right when you are in fact painfully wrong.
"It's" is shorthand for "it is". You say "It's John's dog. Its eyes are blue." The possessive -- that's with ss as in "possess," mind you -- you will notice the correct use of a possessive in the second part of the sentence.
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
(*) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[ ] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[*] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
(*) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[*] Additional comments:
Copying and pasting a sentence from the linked article does not make for an informative post.
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
(*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
( ) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
(*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is neither of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.1
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
(*) You made a tired SCO joke
( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
( ) Other (please comment here: )
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it
is neither of the three. This is because:
( ) You stated the obvious
( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time!:)
( This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome. )
Slashdot Mirror
PoorPost Form v. 0.24
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.24
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.24
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.24
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[ ] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[*] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[*] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.23
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.23
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.22
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[ ] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[*] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[*] Additional comments: :)
Sir Haxalot is a cheap karma whore. Moderators, please reconsider moderating him up in the future.
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.22
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[*] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
#include ...so how exactly are we supposed to "compile under Linux"?
#include <winsock2.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <process.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <winbase.h>
No. It's funny how you think you are right when you are in fact painfully wrong.
"It's" is shorthand for "it is". You say "It's John's dog. Its eyes are blue." The possessive -- that's with ss as in "possess," mind you -- you will notice the correct use of a possessive in the second part of the sentence.
Educate yourself
Your post is officially a Poor one. Thank you for trying, better luck next time!
You wrote "it's" where you should've written "its."
PoorPost Form v. 0.21
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
TWAIN - Technology Without An Interesting Name
That sound you hear is his joke swooshing past way above your head!
So what, exactly, does Opera, being proprietary and commercial in every way, have to to with the "Open Source Community?"
PoorPost Form v. 0.21
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[ ] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[*] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[*] Additional comments:
Copying and pasting a sentence from the linked article does not make for an informative post.
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.21
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.2
Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.
[*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:
[ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is neither of the three. This is because:
[ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:
[ ] Additional comments:
Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
(This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)
PoorPost Form v. 0.1 Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future. [*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because: ( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS ( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse (*) You made a tired SCO joke ( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?) ( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant) ( ) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.) ( ) Other (please comment here: ) [ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is neither of the three. This is because: ( ) You stated the obvious ( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words ( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll ( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's ( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny ( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap ( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner) ( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer) [ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons: ( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early ( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed ( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you ( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated" [ ] Additional comments: Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)
( This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome. )
5 dollars per carot. Damn.
"Damn" as in "damn, that's one expensive carrot?"