Slashdot Mirror


Statistically Optimal Music

ShinyPlasticBag writes "'Eigenradio makes its optimal music by analyzing in real time dozens of radio stations at once. When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it. Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on and always live. What you hear on Eigenradio is the best of the New Music, distilled and de-correlated. One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.' Listen up here or here (SHOUTcast)."

296 comments

  1. Hello darkness, my old friend by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I quickly checked out the site and hit the #1 "Listen" link. At first, it was an interesting mix... in fact, it sounded very much like tuning an AM radio between stations, except that the overlapping songs were in clearly-defined hi-fi.

    It was jarring at first, but then I got into a groove. They're right, the beat and the ambient voices have a strange but familiar variance.

    Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be able to keep up the experience. After about a minute, the rhythms stopped, replaced by a metallic, toneless hum.

    Cool... I've seen the Slashdot effect before, but now I'm getting to hear it!

    Footnote: the rhythm has returned, but there's a lot more buzz than before. Will be interesting to hear what happens when the non-subscriber flood hits.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by turg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

      I heard the same thing that you did, but as I understand it, the only input that goes into the music is the content of the radio stations to which the server is listening. I don't see how the number of listeners to eigenradio would have cause the effect you're describing.

      --
      <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    2. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

      I guess it would depend on how they've configured their systems. If they have one box processing the incoming signals, and another box uploading the result to their Windows Media Server, then we might overload the second box but the sound would be unchanged.

      But if the box that does the processing is the same as the one that's attempting to service all the requests from Slashdotters, it seems like it would eat up CPU cycles. That would make it more difficult to do the real-time synthesis of 20 incoming signals. I suspect that's the cause of the toneless drone I was hearing.

      Add to that the bandwidth -- do they have one pipe that's receiving 20 signals, outputting (however many) Eigenradio streams, *and* serving up the strangely-formatted web page?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but recieving the signals isn't the problem, they're being pulled out of the FM spectrum. 20 radio stations. You're probably onto something with the CPU usage tho. Interesting...

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    4. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by turg · · Score: 1

      So you're assuming that there's only a few seconds between when eigenradio "hears" something and when that sound gets used in eigenradio's own composition. My guess would be that there is actually a longer lag in between these two events.

      --
      <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    5. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by matt-fu · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be able to keep up the experience. After about a minute, the rhythms stopped, replaced by a metallic, toneless hum.

      Actually that's not uncommon even when the site isn't getting its ass handed to it. I've hit up the stream a few times before and I always get the toneless hum.

    6. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Gettin'_Fatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only we could do this to actions movies...one hummin' explode-fest!

      --

      Surely, we don't need instructions on shampoo bottles, do we?.

    7. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      I don't know if shoutcast degrades the audio when the available bandwidth decreases (like realplayer, for instance), but if so that could explain how slashdotting could influence the audio, not as it is generated, but as it is heard...

    8. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Nope, it just starts skipping (buffering, playing, buffering, playing). However, Shoutcast servers have hard max listener counts to prevent them from running out of bandwidth. Which is why nobody can connect to the stream right now, it's full.

    9. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1, Troll

      What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

      It wouldn't necessarily change the music itself.

      But if enough people hit it to cause major packet drop in the path from the server to the listener, the listener's player will try to fill in the gaps.

      A common way to do this is to replay the last buffer. If the outage is long this tends to generate a metallic buzz if the buffer is short and a "Max Headroom"-style stutter if the buffer is long.

      You could also get a metallic buzz out of a voder if the updates stopped coming in.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    10. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Jonner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rarely is the need for mulitcast felt more than when a music stream is slashdotted.

    11. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...commercials...

    12. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 0, Troll
      We GAVE peace a chance. Boycott the ANTI-war machine.

      w00t w00t!!

    13. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So maybe we were hearing the lag from when the original story was posted days ago.

      What? This isn't a dupe? ok nevermind then.

    14. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by rrrrrick · · Score: 1
      • If the server locks up, the tune could freeze on one wavelet packet, hence the buzz.
      --
      aiai aaia aiai aaia aiai aaia aii i iai iai iai iai iai ii aiai aia
    15. Re:Hello darkness, my old friend by FloridaSage · · Score: 1

      Runs in MP3!?!?! My RH9 boxen objects!!! So much for the Open in OSS! But, I had no trouble with the horizontal scrolling! Need to do it in OggVorbis! DUH!

  2. The RIAA? by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What does the RIAA have to say about you using their copyrighted material to generate music - music which is arguably not unique, but rather derivatives of their property?

    1. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Negativland.

    2. Re:The RIAA? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah...
      What do they have to say about using the very algorithm that they apparently use to generate much of their own music, judging from the songs being released the past decade or so?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:The RIAA? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I don't think Bad Boy Records will have anything bad to say about it.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    4. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what RIAA thinks, this is MIT we are talking about. If the RIAA decides to sue, the school will send a hungry pack of rabid beavers after the music industry's lawyers.

    5. Re:The RIAA? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't there a minimum amount of copyrighted material that has to be sampled before it requires compensating the artist? So far, I haven't heard more than a ~2sec snippet of recognizable voice, so maybe it falls below the threshhold.

      Not that that would keep the RIAA's goons from filing suit. But that's alright... if they try to listen now, they'll hear a metallic buzz (if they can connect at all).

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    6. Re:The RIAA? by noname3 · · Score: 1

      They'll treat every snippet as a song, claim that it's a new piracy technique, and since the average song length is 3 minutes and these listeners will hear about 10 clips per minute.. Then one user is the equivalent to 30 listeners, isn't it? The same RIAA math that brought us equivalent burners will take the amount of current connections, multiply by 30, and then use the $0.0007 per connection per song webcaster fee to suck every last penny out of the broadcasters.

    7. Re:The RIAA? by Sphere1952 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They'll probably subpoena the entire MIT student body via the D.C. court.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    8. Re:The RIAA? by piznut · · Score: 1

      Does most of the new stuff that falls under the RIAA's control qualify as "arguably unique"?

      To me it's just one long blur of pseudo-musical masturbation.

    9. Re:The RIAA? by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it can be argued that the algorithm that has created this music has, in a sense, encrypted the popular music it was derived from. If the RIAA can detect their copyrighted music in the newly generated music, it must mean they have circumvented that music's encryption. Say hello to the DMCA, Hillary.

      But if you don't want to go with the fire w/ fire method, you could also call the newly generated music a parody of popular music -- it is, as you said, derivatives of their property -- and protect it that way.
      .

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    10. Re:The RIAA? by El · · Score: 1

      Come now, I'm sure this music is no more derivative of RIAA music than say, Linux is derivative of SCO Unix... eh, wait, these are lawyers, aren't they? Er... never mind!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    11. Re:The RIAA? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      That's an urban legend. Any usage of samples violates copyright law if not approved ahead of time by the copyright holder.

      Either way, this isn't something that will be commercially viable in the near future, so I doubt the RIAA will take much notice.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    12. Re:The RIAA? by clambake · · Score: 1

      What does the RIAA have to say about you using their copyrighted material to generate music - music which is arguably not unique, but rather derivatives of their property?

      Not much unless they want to start paying me for breathing in the air my plants expel... Just because you make something doesn't mean somone else can't use it if you are just giving it away for free... or at least one woul dhope for society's sake.

    13. Re:The RIAA? by moncyb · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's an urban legend. Any usage of samples violates copyright law if not approved ahead of time by the copyright holder.

      IANAL, but I'm sure this is wrong. While it is probably true you can't use samples in the way mentioned in the article without permission, there is such a thing as fair use. You can have a small sample for the purposes of commenting on something. Say you were writing an article about reverse speech, and you swear you hear "Ah babe, as I make love" in a song called Foolish Beat by some singer named Debbie Gibson, it would probably be okay to include the specific part of the song as a sample, though the law doesn't seem to be specific here, and the RIAA might try to sue you anyway. (Just because they're legally wrong doesn't stop the RIAA.)

      Commenting is one of the major purposes of fair use: to enable fair speech and help uphold the "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" clause in the Constitution. The government isn't promoting science if scientists are restricted on how they write papers on a certain subject just because something they're illustrating is copyrighted. Similar clauses about encryption research were in the DMCA, but as usual, the RIAA ignored them. Copyright was intended to allow people to make money off their works, not restrict others from talking about those works.

      The real FUD about fair use is spread by the "all music is free" crowd and the RIAA. The "all music is free" crowd insist it's fair use to just give away the entire song as long as you don't charge for it. Obviously false. Part of the test for fair use is the economic impact of the copying. At least some of the people would have bought the work but didn't because they got it for free. (Though the RIAA tries to overbloat this and say every copy adversely affects their sales. Even "RAM buffer copies", copies which just sit on a hard drive and never get listened too, even copies downloaded by some teenager who couldn't afford a single CD, even other songs which have a similar name to an RIAA one.) The RIAA says there is no such thing as fair use. Obviously false too. If it were true, there wouldn't be a section in Federal Law about fair use at all.

    14. Re:The RIAA? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      While it is probably true you can't use samples in the way mentioned in the article without permission

      That is exactly the point of my post. You are arguing apples vs. oranges. The topic was not the composition of an article to analyze modern music, it was the composition of new music using already existing, commercial music.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    15. Re:The RIAA? by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Then why did you say "Any usage" if you knew it was wrong? If you said something like "this type of sample usage...", then I wouldn't have a problem, but by writing your post that way, you are perpetuating another "urban legend."

    16. Re:The RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if i deconstruct the music into four note progressions, add it to a huge table of similar deconstructions, then i apply a pseudo-random constructor that (p-)randomly takes the segments and combines them with other random pieces that have overlapping notes at the end. I am "composing new music from already existing, commercial music". This has already been done by researches and has been non-actionable with regard to copyright. (sorry, no links)

  3. Suicide by neonstz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow I don't think posting a link to a shoutcast-stream on slashdot is the smartest thing to do...

  4. I can't help thinking by rritterson · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been listening to the stream for 5 minutes or so now. I can't help thinking that this is what a band of R2D2's would sound like, with C3P0 in random memory access as lead vocalist.

    It's so very electronic and unnatural sounding, like nothing of this world.

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
  5. American Bandstand rating: 2 out of 10 by turg · · Score: 1

    Not quite something you can dance to, is it? I'd be interested in hearing the original music that's "just like" the Eigenradio (though I think I might prefer the Eigenradio).

    --
    <sig>Guvf vf abg n frperg zrffntr
    1. Re:American Bandstand rating: 2 out of 10 by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Funny
      Not quite something you can dance to, is it?

      No, but it's great for epileptic spasms...

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:American Bandstand rating: 2 out of 10 by murr · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in hearing the original music that's "just like" the Eigenradio

      Lou Reed, "Metal Machine Music"

  6. Worst designed web site ever... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Horizontal scrolling required
    2. Tiny
    3. Virtually no links to anything
    4. Very small amount of information

    John.

    1. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by hey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree.

      How shocking a site where you have to
      pan instead of scroll!!!
      Why not?

      It was easy to understand how to use it.

      It used html and not (yuck) Flash.

    2. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rather liked the horizontal scrolling. It's neat if you have absolutely no vertical scrolling. The rest I agree with, though. Definately needs more detail, and I doubt the horizontal format would hold up as well if it was a dynamic or more content-filled site.

    3. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by reidbold · · Score: 1

      how shocking?
      how poorly designed.
      how unnatural.
      and my mouse wheel doesn't work.

      all of the paragraphs are clearly aligned in columns, so why not just line it up.

      --
      -Reid
    4. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Well, that's fine if you are writing a web page for a language that is written vertically, but english is a right to left language, which mean horizontal scrolling is usually very very bad.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      .right to left read normally is English that sworn have could I

    6. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by LineNoiz · · Score: 1

      but english is a right to left language ...thgir ot tfel stI

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    7. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by rbullo · · Score: 1

      Actually, I find pannng quite inconvinient, especially when you are trying to read. Moving the screen back and forth to get the full story is not the best thing for your eyes... at least on a 14" CRT.

      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    8. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you've hit upon the essence of the Media Lab itself!

    9. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Shenkerian · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, that's fine if you are writing a web page for a language that is written vertically, but english is a right to left language, which mean horizontal scrolling is usually very very bad.

      You must read and write a dialect of English with which I'm unfamiliar.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    10. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by BuckshotJones · · Score: 1

      Totally. What the heck is Eigenradio anyways? The website has a Qbert-inspired picture with letters and arrows flying everywhere that doesn't help explain "What it is".

      So can anyone who has listened to the stream tell us what it sounds like?

    11. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an imagination.

    12. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by 11223 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ."s'ti" si rof gnikool er'uoy drow ehT ."sti" fo mrof evissesop eht si "stI"

    13. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by loucura! · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ."mrof" si rof gnikool er'ouy drow eht eveileb ,nam good yM ?"morF"<"yug koob cimoc"=eciov>

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    14. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by kovarg · · Score: 1

      Damn you unique design!!! 1. originality sucks 2. be a mindless follower 3. profit

      --
      blame me!
    15. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      and my mouse wheel doesn't work.
      Maybe that's because the mouse wheel should really be a mouse trackball (think about it - it would be damn cool).
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    16. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .right to left read normally is English that sworn have could I


      Until I looked at the parent I figured you were making some lame Jar-Jar reference.

    17. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .ris ,setouq eht ni desolcne eb dluohs karm noitseuq tahT

      gis. on

    18. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by SYFer · · Score: 1

      I take it then that you also prefer scrolls to books?

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    19. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by yarisbandit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, it is cool - i have one.

      It's called the Typhoon magic ball mouse or the 8D scroll ball mouse, and I picked it up for a tenner or so (euro) in Lidl.

      Usb too (not 2, i mean aswell...) There's bound to be others, but this one is the finest cheapest one money can buy :)

    20. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by yarisbandit · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and it handles the horizontal scrolling like nipples on a brass chick cutting glass after the first dip of the new year on a cold frosty january 1st. Whew.

    21. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by loucura! · · Score: 1

      .nam doog ,ton m'I hcihw ,erutcurts citammarg hsilgnE naciremA gnisu er'ouy fi ylnO

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    22. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by stickyc · · Score: 4, Funny
      How shocking a site where you have to
      pan instead of scroll!!!
      Why not?

      Because my mousewheel (as I'd estimate are 90% of the mousehweels out there) is mounted vertically. And yes, I tried rotating the mouse, that did not help.

    23. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Since you're so well acquainted with the English language, perhaps you'll be surprised to discover that "whilst" is simply British, not pretentious. Just because there are more of us Yanks doesn't mean we control the language.

    24. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by cryms0n · · Score: 1

      Uhh, sphincter says what?

    25. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by yarisbandit · · Score: 1

      Uhhh huh like, you said sphincter. huuuuuhhhh huh.

    26. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, and it handles the horizontal scrolling like nipples on a brass chick cutting glass after the first dip of the new year on a cold frosty january 1st.
      Forgive my ignorance, but does that mean you can horizontal scroll with it or not??
      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    27. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by yarisbandit · · Score: 1

      yep, you can. the above was meant to be similar to "hot knife through butter", only less cliched :)

    28. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, left to right read is English!

      *ducks*

    29. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by 11223 · · Score: 1

      .)ecneuqes fo dnik rehto yna ro( sgnirts ruoy esrever ot "esrever" noitcnuf LC nitliub eht esu dna )/gro.lcbs.www//:ptth ta ,LCBS esu I( noitatnemelpmi psiL nommoC ISNA doog a pu flesruoy kcip uoy taht tseggus I ."form" ti lleps deedni did I

    30. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      .sdrowkcab si gis ruoY

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    31. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try to click (and unclick) the mouse wheel when you're with the arrow onto the horizontal scrool bar then you will be able to scrool left right just moving the mouse left - right

    32. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Avakado · · Score: 1

      How shocking a site where you have to pan instead of scroll!!! Why not?

      Principle of least astonishment: a user interface should behave in the way that least astonishes the user.

      --
      The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
    33. Re:Worst designed web site ever... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      1. Horizontal scrolling required

      Just wait for Microsoft to introduce their horizontal scroll wheel and make it ok to design websites on the width as well. :-P

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  7. Please... by phraktyl · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the love of god, we will give your our women and our money, but make it stop!

    --
    Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    1. Re:Please... by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      I can see money, if you're one of the few who made it past the bust with his job intact? But your women?

      The parent's promises are worse vaporware than Duke Nukem'...

    2. Re:Please... by phraktyl · · Score: 1

      It's a fair statement. This is Slashdot, comprised of IT workers and teenage geeks. Neither of which are known for their abilities to attract and keep women.

      I can promise to give you all the money in my bank account, but that doesn't mean you'll get rich off of it.

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    3. Re: Please... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > For the love of god, we will give your our women and our money, but make it stop!

      I notice you didn't offer your sheep.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Please... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Except of course us married ones. We have the amazing ability to never have a moment of peace to ourselves due to the wife. You single geeks go and hang out at Fry's or at the NetCafe while we do dishes and watch some Hugh Grant flick.

      (unfortunately not joking:\)

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    5. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Except of course us married ones. We have the amazing ability to never have a moment of peace to ourselves due to the wife. You single geeks go and hang out at Fry's or at the NetCafe while we do dishes and watch some Hugh Grant flick.

      (unfortunately not joking:\)


      Shit. I thought it was just me.

    6. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. The first song I heard sounded like the worst combination of a fax machine and modem. Then it started grooving (sped up country lyrics) that got cut-off every 20 seconds to hiss and crackle. Now it sounds like what I would imagine as the hum of the ID4 mothership.

      Perhaps they should concentrate on one generate (say, techno) and sample from that to eliminate the fax-machine effect.

    7. Re:Please... by Man+of+E · · Score: 1

      I don't give away my money!!! What is women?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    8. Re: Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recognize that but can't recall what it's from. Anyone care to share?

    9. Re: Please... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Probably Australian. Everyone has priorities.

      --
      -Styopa
    10. Re:Please... by mink · · Score: 1

      Mine wants to go see Jason vs. Freddy not Hugh Grant.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  8. scanning radio stations? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So, they scan bunchies of stations to make new music.

    Now, if there was anything worth listening to on the radio, I'd say they'd have something, but hey don't because "Garbage In = Garbage Out".

    While hacking up pig snouts and horse hooves might make for an interesting, ummmm... "sausage", it's still nasty dead stuff...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:scanning radio stations? by Hayzeus · · Score: 1
      While hacking up pig snouts and horse hooves might make for an interesting, ummmm... "sausage", it's still nasty dead stuff..

      Someone's obviously never had Uncle Billy's World Famous Hawg's Head Cheese!

  9. Easy answer by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow I don't think posting a link to a shoutcast-stream on slashdot is the smartest thing to do...

    Don't worry, it doesn't have long to live

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  10. Where are the details? by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I wish they had spent as much time documenting what this actually did as they spent making the website pretty, the one remotely technical diagram on the website has no explanation whatsoever as to what it is about.

    IMHO this is yet another example of how academic projects are judged by the amount of attention they attract, rather than on whether they advance the state of the art. This is the reason why people like Kevin Warrick can stick a dog tag in their arm and go around claiming they are the world's first cyborg - all while being lavished with attention by the mainstream media.

    All of this leads to an academic system that increasingly rewards self pubicity at the expense of real reasearch.

    Oh, BTW - I listened to the radio station, it sounds like a garbled mess - I certainly couldn't determine the point of this from listening to it, but then I could say the same thing about rap.

    1. Re:Where are the details? by LineNoiz · · Score: 1

      That was the new Cristina Aguillera album, you insensitive clod...

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Where are the details? by loadquo · · Score: 2, Funny

      About your sig.
      "I named my cat Script."

      Is this a security feature to confuse crackers when they break into your system?
      You should know security by obfuscation never works in the long run. Also it would break other people scripts.

    3. Re:Where are the details? by LineNoiz · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, he's my Script Kitty... Duh...

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Where are the details? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMHO this is yet another example of how academic projects are judged by the amount of attention they attract, rather than on whether they advance the state of the art.

      Every Spring semester at Michigan State University's Computer Science department, the capstone class (taken by seniors to graduate) did a project and had a "poster competition" to see who did the best project.

      The team that won the year I saw them was the team that wrote a program that graphed a song's FFT over time. That's it. They went on to babble about how you can recognize a song based on how it looks, visual recognition, and it did some ill-conceived 3D stuff that, by making the song data fit into even less space on the screen, was even more impossible to see. (I think you were supposed to eventually pick the song you wanted to hear by looking at this tiny, tiny representations.... at the risk of potentially offending one of the authors, who may conceivably read this, that's stupid! If they just seriously tried it once, they'd have seen how poorly this worked.) (See here for an example of a guy playing around with that kind of graph; note most songs look NOTHING like that in an FFT graph. ;-) )

      The fact is, it's a neat idea but it doesn't work. All songs in a particular pretty much look alike in an FFT graph. The differences are pretty minimal. Making it smaller doesn't help at all. The program looked really cool on a poster, using one song, but use it on six or seven real songs and ask even yourself to distinguish them and you can't; you don't "see" and "hear" that way.

      IIRC a dot-com was founded based on this idea, AFAIK indepedently derived.

      What does this have to do with your post? I thought about half of the other posters deserved the prize over this project, in that they were useful, interesting, or potentially even groundbreaking, in the small way that a semester project can be. But they didn't have a Beatles song graphed out on their poster. They lose.

      Even college professors aren't immune to judging on surface appearences and glitz, rather then real value.

    5. Re:Where are the details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reverse discrimination? Who you calling crackers??!!

    6. Re:Where are the details? by sbillard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...but then I could say the same thing about rap

      I'm OT but...
      Be careful there. You are generalizing - perhaps based on what the RIAA, ClearChannel, et al have "allowed" you to hear.

      Rap started out as one of the purest forms of music. It was all about self expression and making the most of the "instruments" you had available to you (aka turntables).
      Some of the common criticisms about rap "bands" are very similar to the criticisms the baby-boomer's parents had about rock-and-roll bands.
      "It all sounds the same"
      "Who's killing the cat"
      "Turn it down"
      "An electric guitar (or turntable) is not an instrument"
      "That isn't music - its just noise"

      The point i'm trying to make is: like blues, rap is pure. The turntable, while ripping off other artist's tracks, isn't always balant and sometimes is a very creative use of teh medium. When done properly it is more of a compliment to the original artist, than a "copyright infringement" (echoes from the past - as I like to think of good scratching).

      I'll conceed that "popular" rap is a load of crap, but so is "modern" rock radio. So, you just go ahead a piss all over rap - you've been conditioned to think that way.

      For those that care, check out:
      early Public Enemy
      Boogie Down Productions
      Cool Herc
      Eric B and Rakim
      Spoonie Gee
      and the Treacherous Three


      There is also a pretty active turntablist movement underway right now
      Mix Master Mike
      Q Bert
      DJ Shadow
      DJ Spooky

    7. Re:Where are the details? by GeoGreg · · Score: 1

      I suspect that this is just a spinoff of some research. Poke around on the MIT Media website, and you find various projects on music recognition and analysis. I'll bet this was some grad student sitting around saying "hey, we could take this thing we did and very easily make an audio stream out of it." Probably not the object of the project, just an amusing spin-off.

    8. Re:Where are the details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      See the publication section at: http://web.media.mit.edu/~bwhitman/

    9. Re:Where are the details? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Years back a former co-worker, when I worked in IT, named their cat Five.

      --
      ...
    10. Re:Where are the details? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO this is yet another example of how academic projects are judged by the amount of attention they attract, rather than on whether they advance the state of the art.


      The vast majority of academic projects on the Web are the exact opposite of this site: usually little more than a bunch of links to publications.
  11. Great by tmark · · Score: 2, Funny

    When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it.

    But what will the RIAA do when there are no more artists ?

    1. Re:Great by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      well, when there are no more real artists who are interested in major label contracts, they're hire britney spears, eminem and 50 cent?

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    2. Re: Great by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > But what will the RIAA do when there are no more artists ?

      That's what they're doing now.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good lord, it's like a minefield of grammatical errors. i need to proofread and post whilst sober.
      -j

    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what will the RIAA do when there are no more artists?
      ---

      Best rhetorical question ever!

    5. Re: Great by Jonner · · Score: 1

      You're right of course. If I were involved in this project, I'd fear an imminent knock on the door from the RIAAstapo on charges of patent infringement or some sort of DMCA violation.

  12. Beezare page by John+Jorsett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Let me just go on record as saying that that's the weirdest web page layout I've encountered in a long time.

    1. Re:Beezare page by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      Let me just go on record as saying that that's the weirdest web page layout I've encountered in a long time.

      Who in hell modded the parent offtopic? It's on topic, and it's accurate.

      That web page rivals the worst corporate web pages: little content, annoying layout that forgets readers may have bigger or smaller monitors than the designer, and painfully small text that does nothing to explain the pretty but meaningless diagrams.

      I can only guess the author is looking for for venture capital.

  13. video by bobtheheadless · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if you can do the same thing with video... hm.

    --
    --- If I had a funny sig too, you might be laughing now.
    1. Re:video by KillerHamster · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could call it "AutoPr0n."

    2. Re:video by copterdoc · · Score: 1

      What if all you watched was porn?

    3. Re:video by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      What if all you watched was porn?

      Then you'd be a stereotypical slashdotter.

      But you'll have to excuse me while I clean "Becky"'s keyboard.

    4. Re:video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect it would end up resembling Picasso's paintings in terms of anatomical accuracy, though.

  14. Re: Statistically Optimal Music by justforaday · · Score: 3, Funny

    One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.

    i'm trying to tune in but i'm not hearing anything...i'd say that makes it better than old radio...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  15. Alright Bastards... by DAQ42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get off those links. Some of us actually listen to this on a regular basis (or rather, all day at work) and it helps us be more productive. Give me back my noise please. I can't get anything done without it...

    --
    Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
  16. whose music is unique? by bodrell · · Score: 1
    What does the RIAA have to say about you using their copyrighted material to generate music - music which is arguably not unique, but rather derivatives of their property?

    Funny you should use the word "derivative." That's exactly the word I'd use to describe 90% of the stuff on radio (especially that ClearChannel (tm) garbage).

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:whose music is unique? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar

      Espabilar? Que significa esa?

  17. MIT everywhere (on slashdot) by hey · · Score: 1

    Its another MIT project on slashdot.
    That makes approximately 25 thousand this week.
    Time for an icon?

    1. Re:MIT everywhere (on slashdot) by 11223 · · Score: 1

      And what /. fails to appreciate is the fact that in the "real world" (defined as everywhere else, including other universities), nobody cares that much about the BS that MIT's putting out. Especially things like this.

      Putting the name "MIT" on it gets funding, but that doesn't make it useful.

  18. Well.. by Squidgee · · Score: 1
    I really would love to hear it; sounds really neat. However, "The streaming server cannot accept any more connections at this time."

    D'oh! And it sounded so cool, too!

  19. Too many notes by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Funny
    Eigenradio plays only the most important frequencies, only the beats with the highest entropy ... One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.

    Reader's Digest comes to music.

  20. Two suggestions... by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beat and pitch.

    Make the derivative "music" at least try to keep these consistant, or at least slowly varying. If you can do that, this might work well.

  21. Creativity by worm+eater · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting that a bank of computers replicating human music can be so much more interesting than humans trying to replicate human music. I guess they have have a long way to go before they can make music as boring as most major record labels. "It's a feature, not a bug."

    --
    Maybe partying will help...
  22. wonderful organized noise is good for you. try it! by linuxbaby · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The first time I heard "noise" music like this, I was flipping around radio stations while driving down a highway. It all seemed like the same old 4-minute song with verse, chorus, verse, chorus, songs about love, 4/4 beats, major/minor keys, guitar-keys-bass-drums-vocals.

    And then... hit a college station playing this noise!

    What a refreshment! What a way to cleanse the pallette. No chords. No lyrics. No beats. No guitars. Nothing recognizable at all! Just wonderful organized noise.

    Then after listening to a LOT of it, especially the stuff that you know was actually composed by a human, something new happens:

    You start to listen to the world around you (traffic, nature, conversations) as if it was composed. Imagining a single intention behind the noise of the world. It really is a beautiful mindset. See the restaurant scene in the movie "32 Short Films About Glenn Gould." http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0108328/

    If you haven't spent a lot of time with music like this, try it. If you hate it after 5 minutes, listen for 10. If you hate it after 10, listen for 20. Try to appreciate it.

    --
    Derek Sivers, CD Baby
    http://www.cdbaby.com

  23. Sure you wanted to post that link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a surprise, it's Slashdotted...

  24. Yuck! by acousticiris · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know what radio stations they are sampling, but after a few minutes of listening it sounded like a bunch of "pop-tart" music strewn together being blasted over AM radio...
    I used to always joke that you could take all of the Spear Britney albums and--if mixed properly--you could make one long song that didn't change themes, tones or melody once...I'm thinking this is one step closer to proving that theory.... Maybe it was just the time I tuned in--who knows?
    There is one thing I find curious though, when I pick from 20 stations in my area, they are all playing the same 9 songs... I hope they have a better selection to choose from than I do!

    --
    "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
    "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
  25. NPR? by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 1, Troll

    So how long would this thing need to listen to NPR before it can start spitting out nice, liberal-minded stories with the sweet ring of Nina Totenberg's voice?

    As far as information thoery goes, there can't be too much more real information in your average NPR bit than in a few minutes of dance music.

  26. help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please help me. I am stupid. How do I listen to to these .m3u thingies in Linux?

    1. Re:help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use xmms or mplayer. Right now, the server is overloaded, so you won't be able to hear anything until people stop hitting the server so hard.

    2. Re:help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open them in XMMS. It handles them just fine.

    3. Re:help by sillydragon · · Score: 1

      Click on the link and select 'Open' from the options it gives you. Open it with /usr/bin/xmms (or wherever XMMS hides on your machine).

    4. Re:help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Open it with /usr/bin/xmms (or wherever XMMS hides on your machine).


      Lessee now, that would be c:\Program Files\xmms\xmms.exe right? ;-)

  27. Familiar... by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kinda reminds me of that "Super Recipe" generator I engineered in my lair beneath the Pacific Ocean a few weeks ago. It makes super recipes based on good recipes that you input into it. I like ice cream and filet mignon, so the generator created a filet cream recipe that was supposed to be super but was terrible.
    Blast!

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:Familiar... by jat850 · · Score: 1

      Did you forget to bacon-wrap the filet cream?? That's the best part!!

      --
      the blood has stopped pumping, and he's left to decay
      the me that you know is now made up of wires
  28. Wow! by Squidgee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, this really cleared up how this works for me! Thanks for such a clear, informative diagram!

    1. Re:Wow! by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      They missed the essential step that makes it work. I'm probably violating the DMCA by revealing it, but here goes:

      "And then, magic happens. Some math may be involved as well."

      Catch me if you can!

    2. Re:Wow! by hyfe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually..

      PCA = Principal Component Analyses.. in essence it draws reduces the number of variables in a dataset by making up totally new ones... so in essence its just a simplification of their input.

      As to what the others are, I'm sure there are somebody here with more than my extremely meager signal processing knowledge:

      ACB = No clue
      DTW = Dynamic Time Warping
      NMF = Non-negative Matrix Factorization

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  29. Mirror - server's full by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

    100101011 010110101 000101010 1110010101
    100010101 010001010 101011010 1001010001
    001010101 101010001 010110001 0101010010....

    1. Re:Mirror - server's full by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      I detected a checksum error in your stream. I think this is the last sequence of bits sent by the server:

      01101111 01101000 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100111 01110011 00100000 01110011 01101100 01100001 01110011 01101000 01100100 01101111 01110100 00100001

      This link may be helpful.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:Mirror - server's full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      01101111 01101000 00100000 01101101
      01111001 00100000 01100111 01101111
      01100100 00100000 01111001 01101111
      01110101 00100111 01110010 01100101
      00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101
      01101111 01101110 01101011 01100101
      01111001
    3. Re:Mirror - server's full by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      01010111011010000110000101110100001000000110101101 10100101101110011001000010000001101111011001100010 00000110011001101111011011110110110000100000011101 11011100100110100101110100011001010111001100100000 01101001011011100010000001100010011010010110111001 100001011100100111100100111111

  30. why scroll instead of pan by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What an interesting comment, I had to think about that one for a second. Generally Indo-European text reads across rather than up and down, so if a paragraph is horizontally larger than your window you have to pan twice to read each line, which is very annoying. However if a paragraph extends vertically a single scroll is sufficient for each page of text.

    1. Re:why scroll instead of pan by zabieru · · Score: 1

      But on the other hand, the site in question is arranged so you only have to pan once for each page of text... Granted, it's not smooth like scrolling, but if you wanted discrete pages rather than the more fluid scrolling arrangement, you might consider that an advantage... I actually liked it, the only downside I see is that the mousewheel won't wor, and that's fixable...

  31. Marketing has already done this... by repressitol · · Score: 1

    Seems to me marketing has been trying for years to create "optimal music" by homogenizing the sounds of every genre of music out there. Take the "packaged anger" bands, for example.

  32. No connection needed to listen! by soulsteal · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you listen carefully, you can hear the server whimper as it slowly melts under a slashdotting.

    1. Re:No connection needed to listen! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      If you listen carefully, you can hear the server whimper

      Listen carefully?? WHIMPER?!?!?
      It is screamming in horror and agony.

      as it slowly melts under a slashdotting.

      Mere melting would be a welcome relief, euthanasia an act of mercy.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:No connection needed to listen! by PoorPost+Troll · · Score: 1

      PoorPost Form v. 0.21

      Your post has been moderated positively but that moderation must have been in jest or error. Your post sucks. Please review this form to understand the weaknesses in your post and how to produce higher quality posts in the future.

      [*] Your post was modded funny but is not really funny. This is because:

      • ( ) You post simply used M$ instead of MS
      • ( ) You went back to beating the Windows security dead horse
      • ( ) You made a tired SCO joke
      • ( ) You made a Jon Katz joke (who?)
      • ( ) MS blowz, linux rules (or a variant)
      • (*) You made an unoriginal joke about Slashdotting (servers turning to powder, melting, etc.)
      • ( ) Other (please comment here: )

      [ ] Your post is modded insightful, informative, or interesting. In fact it is none of the three. This is because:

      • ( ) You stated the obvious
      • ( ) You simply tossed out lots of five-dollar words
      • ( ) It was in response to a poorly-written post or troll
      • ( ) You copied text from a previous post that really might have been one of the three I's
      • ( ) You simply criticized Microsoft without making it funny
      • ( ) It is bloated with unnecessary technical claptrap
      • ( ) All you did was pose questions (like a stoner)
      • ( ) All you did was pose questions (like a lawyer)

      [ ] Your post may be rated too highly in general for the following reasons:

      • ( ) You are an asterisk who has, knowing the story's release time in advance, pounceposted to get first p0st and get modded up early
      • ( ) You are one of the editors and are getting your ass kissed
      • ( ) One of your fans has weighed in for you
      • ( ) One of the editors has blessed it with an "underrated"

      [ ] Additional comments:

      Thanks for posting! Better luck next time! :)

      (This form is currently in alpha and suggestions for its improvement are always welcome.)

  33. YOU LIKEWISE FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your grammar for the "YOU FAIL IT" post is not statistically optimal.

  34. You have no idea. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    If that is all it takes for you to call a site 'bad' or even 'worst site ever' you haven't seen websites man.
    I've seen websites so bad they violate the SALT 2 treaty against tactical nuclear weapons.
    This one is an original Micheangelo compared to those.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  35. Funny quote from the web site... by voxel · · Score: 1

    "Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on and always live."

    And now officially "always Slashdotted"...

    We should make sure they add that to the end of that scentence :)

    - Voxel

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  36. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by DrEasy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You start to listen to the world around you (traffic, nature, conversations) as if it was composed.
    Yes, that's John Cage's premise to his "music" as well.
    --
    "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  37. Replaced by a metallic toneless hum you say? by azav · · Score: 1

    That was the sound of the slashdotting of a shoutcast stream.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  38. John Cage by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those of you enjoying these ideas might want to check out John Cage's wonderful video, I have nothing to say and I am saying it.

    John Cage was a revolutionary philosopher-artist-composer with some good ideas on how to be happy :-) In many ways he has incorporated Eastern thinking into Western arts.

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  39. Sounds like a tuning session by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a garage band tuning their instruments while their was some strange feedback being picked up in the background. It's horrid, it should filter out high pitched buzz noises and other things like that. And it should make some system of rythem, it's like random chunks of crap mixed into one big random chunk of crap.

  40. Funny quote from the web site... by voxel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on and always live."

    This should be now officially changed to:

    "Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on, always live and always Slashdotted!"...

    - Voxel

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  41. Interesting name... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1

    I wonder why they chose to name it "Eigenradio"? Eigen being a German word, it seems that the primary meaning is "to own." Really makes me wonder what kind of statement they are trying to make. Of course it seems obvious to me that the main point of this project (outside of the technical challenge presented) is to make some sort of statement regarding the music industry.

    --
    Do not read this sig.
    1. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever heard of an Eigenvector?

      eigenvector

      A vector which, when acted on by a particular
      linear transformation, produces a scalar multiple of the
      original vector. The scalar in question is called the
      eigenvalue corresponding to this eigenvector.

      It should be noted that "vector" here means "element of a
      vector space" which can include many mathematical entities.
      Ordinary vectors are elements of a vector space, and
      multiplication by a matrix is a linear transformation on
      them; smooth functions "are vectors", and many partial
      differential operators are linear transformations on the space
      of such functions; quantum-mechanical states "are vectors",
      and observables are linear transformations on the state
      space.

      An important theorem says, roughly, that certain linear
      transformations have enough eigenvectors that they form a
      basis of the whole vector states. This is why Fourier
      analysis works, and why in quantum mechanics every state is a
      superposition of eigenstates of observables.

      An eigenvector is a (representative member of a) fixed point
      of the map on the projective plane induced by a linear
      map.

    2. Re:Interesting name... by Yonzie · · Score: 1

      IIRC, `Eigen' can also mean something along the lines of `one of a kind'.
      Alas, it's a one-of-a-kind radio station, which is simultaneously true and a pun.
      Great naming.

    3. Re:Interesting name... by BengalsUF · · Score: 1

      Best brush up on your higher math and check out eigenvalues.

    4. Re:Interesting name... by chaboud · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the creator is playing on every state in quantum mechanics being a superposition of eigenstates of observables.

      Or he is attempting to make some play on eigenvectors, but I don't think that this music is composed by some sort of linear transform in the space of the musical components. I'm not sure. Go check out Mathworld's writeup on Eigenvectors if you want to pursue that path of marketing madness. Maybe it would make more sense if the stream wasn't completely slashdotted.

    5. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eigenvalues

      Probably how they find what parts are associated. I don't understand them, but I'm pretty sure that's what they're referring to.

    6. Re:Interesting name... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Eigen is a fairly well-established prefix in quantum mechanics (eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenstates etc.) An eigenstate is one of an infinite set of orthogonal solutions to a set of equations, an eigenvalue is a unique value (often energy) corresponding to a particular eigenstate. Thus I suspect in this case the term is supposed to mean something like "unique radio", which seems at least reasonably appropriate, if rather skewed. I suspect you're wrong about it being a comment on the state of the music industry, at least primarily. It seems like they're just using radio stations as a source of material 'cos it happens to be readily available. 'Course, the fact that it can't be much /worse/ than commercial radio is pretty ironic ;-)

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    7. Re:Interesting name... by GeoGreg · · Score: 1

      In line with what others have said in reply to this comment, they have probably done something akin to eigenvalue analysis. This math is stuff that's on the edge of my comprehension, but I bet they are taking a bunch of songs and extracting the time series that "best represents" all of the songs. Umm... basis functions... err principal components... something like that. I need to go study now...

    8. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to own...
      • all your radio are belongs to us
      • in Soviet Russia, the radio owns YOU!
    9. Re:Interesting name... by phliar · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Eigen" in german means "essence of", "characteristic", "similar" etc. The term comes from linear algebra, not quantum mechanics. If x is a vector and A is an operator, and A x (A applied to x) has the same direction as x, then x is an eigenvector of A. For example, if the operation is "reflect in the xy plane", then any vector parallel to the z-axis is an eigenvector of the operator. The scalar that x gets scaled by is called its eigenvalue. For the reflection operator, -1 is the eigenvalue for any eigenvector. QM extended this concept to other objects like states.

      So the term eigenmusic could be used to describe the underlying defining characteristic of a music. You could say that all Britney Spears' music has the same eigenmusic.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    10. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it is a math concept but an application from physics is more revealing

      solving for nth order harmonics is an eigenfunction-eigenvalue problem. that is likely the meaning of eigenmusic.

      (d^2)x/(dt^2)=cx applied to appropriate boundary conditions. where x is displacement(pressure works too)

      sincerely,

      physics, math, and computer geek

    11. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah smartass, and eigen in Dutch means "own".

    12. Re:Interesting name... by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      The name is quite poorly chosen, as millions of german native speakers without a doctorate will spontaneously connect "eigen" to "Eigentum", which means "property". So you have "Owned music" as the primarily perceived meaning, which is as fitting as anything. Sad...

    13. Re:Interesting name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For the reflection operator, -1 is the eigenvalue for
      > any eigenvector.

      Uh yeah, whatever. Asshole.

    14. Re:Interesting name... by Eigenray · · Score: 1

      >> For the reflection operator, -1 is the eigenvalue
      >> for any eigenvector.

      > Uh yeah, whatever. Asshole.

      Yeah, we'll just ignore the smeggin' nontrivial space of bleedin' fixed points bloody lying in the sodding plane of ruddy reflection with bloomin' eigenvalue 1.

      Twit.

      -Eigenray

    15. Re:Interesting name... by Bookem+Danno · · Score: 1

      when you use eigenvalues as a coding/compression scheme in signal processing, the result to the human senses is that you have a base "eigensignal" so to speak, and all signals are defined in how they are different from the base

      example: eigenfaces

      the name is from either using eigenvectors/values in the signal processing, or the guy who named it knows about eigenvalue encoding's effect on signals

  42. Re: Statistically Optimal Music by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    One song on Eigenradio is worth at least twenty songs on old radio.

    But how many songs is it worth on a 56x burner?

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  43. kittens with mittens? by mystik · · Score: 4, Funny
    <meta name="keywords" content="eigenradio, eigen, radio, non-negative matrix factorization, pca, ica, dwt, singular values, machine listening, whitman, brian, media, lab, kittens with mittens">

    anyone look at the page source?

    I bet this is how they Really make the music ...

    --
    Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    1. Re:kittens with mittens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kittens wearing mittens and playing harps and steel drums and theramin...

    2. Re:kittens with mittens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kittens with mittens and perverts with servers,
      hackers and slackers and crackers accessing
      Musical radio, transmitted on strings,
      We've now slashdotted my favorite things...

      [with apologies]

      -T

  44. Sounds like errors... by tha_mink · · Score: 1

    "The requested server is full."

    --
    You'll have that sometimes...
  45. Peercast to avoid the Slashdotting? by Kaimelar · · Score: 3, Informative

    This idea has sparked my interest, but the streams are most definately Slashdotted. Would it be possible for someone who has the stream to use Peercast to help take some of the burden off the server?

  46. Why do I get the notion by John+Zebedee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... that this site is a wonderfully clever troll? Once you get past the notion that anyone could possibly be serious about Eigenmusic, satire is all that makes sense. A tip of the hat to the creators!

    --
    The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. -- William Gibson
    1. Re:Why do I get the notion by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually this is a serious concept that goes back to John Cage's piece Imaginary Landscape #4, which was scored for 12 radios tuned at random.

      Of course that doesn't necessarily preclude it's being satire as well. The mind is fully capable of holding two contradictory ideas at once. Religious fundamentalists do it all the time.

      KFG

    2. Re:Why do I get the notion by writertype · · Score: 1

      Add me to your list. I thought it was satire from the intro blurb on the Slashdot home page.

  47. Specific Sample Data by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be interesting to hear the differences in "statistically optimal" music produced as a result of correlating different genres of music.

    E.g., would people who only listened to Rock be more inclined to like the output of this program if its input was limited to Rock music? Could it create an "optimal" song?

  48. Re:more crap, just like the old crap by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm going way off topic here, but has anyone else heard what's going in Northern Califorina with the college radio stations being scrambled by christian fund-raising stations? I have no problems with any religious station, even if it's for questionable practices, but they're screwing with the public college stations because of an FCC loophole. Below is a copy/paste of the situation

    The Problem: A few years ago a station from Stockton, California, known as "Your Christian Companion" (KYCC) set up a translator in the eastern suburbs of Sacramento. They licensed a translator on 90.1FM (translator number K211DF), and since then, the once listenable signal of KDVS has been knocked off the spectrum there. Since then, KCJH/KYCC, the station that preaches God's word, has been expanding, setting up stations to cause interference with other stations like non-profit student stations similar to KDVS. In the East Bay area near Livermore, you can hear KYCC on 2 to 4 different frequencies, covering up many Bay Area college radio stations. The station is a fundraising tool for itself, collecting money to go toward buying new translators to feed their programming via automated procedure via satellite. This conservative entity is using non-commercial educational frequencies as a loophole to rebroadcast satellite programming in effort to gain more money for their own causes. Because of this, listeners in some parts of Sacramento cannot tune into KDVS. You can help try to get the FCC to move their translator from 90.1 FM to another frequency by making your voice heard to the FCC. Here's how you can help. Write an email stating you listen to KDVS radio, the only college/student run station in the area. State that KDVS 90.3FM is a Sacramento area station at 9200 watts, but it cannot be heard in some parts of Sacramento because 90.1 FM interferes with it. The station used to be heard in all of Sacramento, but since 90.1 FM came on the air, it causes so much interference that it essentially blocks the signal in some areas. (You may add other comments).

    Give Your First and Last Name
    Your Address
    Email Address

    Email your statement to todd@kdvs.org. with "INTERFERECE COMPLAINT" in the subject heading It will then be compiled with other letters and sent to the FCC jointly.

    You may also reach the FCC at their web site: www.fcc.gov. and make comments there

    KYCC's growing station list
    90.1 Stockton
    89.1 Livington
    89.7 Antioch/Pittburg
    90.5 Livermore
    91.1 Chico
    90.3 Dublin
    93.5 Vacaville
    87.7 Benicia
    90.1 Sacramento
    99.5 Elk Grove
    91.3 Provo Utah
    89.9 Alamogordo, NM
    89.1 El Paso, Texas
    88.3 Reno, NV

  49. GIGO by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What you hear on Eigenradio is the best of the New Music, distilled and de-correlated.
    One important thing I learned in my statistics classes was "Garbage In, Garbage Out", essentially that any system which is fed garbage will produce garbage as its result... Given that most new music is garbage, won't this merely produce garbage as its output?
  50. Peas, Mashed Potatoes, Gravy, Roast Beef by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    Taking all this, mixing it together in a big bowl, does not make something resembling the components, or even anything very appealing.

    Well, neither does this.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:Peas, Mashed Potatoes, Gravy, Roast Beef by volsung · · Score: 1

      Actually, that sounds pretty good.

    2. Re:Peas, Mashed Potatoes, Gravy, Roast Beef by Planx_Constant · · Score: 1

      Mmmm... Shepherd's pie.

      --
      Heisenberg might have been here.
    3. Re:Peas, Mashed Potatoes, Gravy, Roast Beef by klang · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's actually a nice dish, if you bake it in the oven.

      Anyway, if you take all the items of a menu at a restaurant, I am quite sure that you could create a new dish (or a few thousand). Getting the right balance is not something that can be done statistically. It's part of the creative process.

      The music industry, has already written the creativity out of the process by copying itself to an extend where you can't hear the difference between one band and the other. Kind of like tv-dinners .. They are not good for you but people buy it anyway because they don't know better..

  51. patient alternative by hitchhacker · · Score: 1, Informative

    For others unable to listen to eigenradio because of the slashdot effect. I recommend groove salad until things calm down:

    www.somafm.com
    128k
    56k
    24k

    The DJ, Rusty Hodge, had an interview with slashdot a while back.
    enjoy

    -metric

    1. Re:patient alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd recommend ravetrax. Being a sys admin, I must apologize as I'm way to lazy to actually post a link, but you can find it on shoutcast or ravetrax.com

  52. Hrm by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    I think from the dead webserver they are now playing a very literal version of Simon and Garfunkel's The Sounds of Silence - because I can't hear a damn thing!

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  53. eigen by fred+ugly · · Score: 1

    It also means "proper." Hence its use in linear algebra (eigenvalue, eigenvector, eigenspace...) So eigenradio is "proper radio."

  54. I don't understand... by stephenry · · Score: 1

    I find this drive for computer generated artificial music unnecessary. Why bother, when we have airwaves full of _equally_ uninspired, artifical music such as Justin Timberlake and Christina Aguilera.

    Besides, it seems like this process of Musical distillation, of which the story speaks, has brought us these "talents" in the first place!

  55. M3U by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    M3U is a text file containing a newline-delimited list of resource identifiers from which to stream audio or video. They can be URIs or local paths. XMMS, Winamp, and many other popular media players can handle M3U files; some save their playlists in this format.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:M3U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, .m3u's don't do shit for me. .mp3 please? I don't want streams, I want 5 to 8 minutes of the stuff and if I like it, I'll listen to it over and over.

  56. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because 20 radio stations play this music doesn't mean I like it. actually, there is only one radio station(fm, not internet) that I listen to.

  57. Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noise.

    There is actually SOME music in it, but there is also a lot of blatant chaos...

    It's fun to listen to, though.

  58. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by esper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you haven't spent a lot of time with music like this, try it. If you hate it after 5 minutes, listen for 10. If you hate it after 10, listen for 20. Try to appreciate it.

    Uh, why? I checked eigenradio out a week or two back and, in addition to being boring as hell, it was physically painful to listen to. But I made myself stick with it for a bit, in an attempt to see what was so wonderful about it. I failed miserably.

    So, would you care to go beyond your admonition to "try to appreciate it" and tell us just what you think is there to appreciate? Is it just your "beautiful mindset" of believing the world to be overarchingly ordered or is there some other reason you're telling us to continue listening to something we hate?

  59. Too Late by cheesee · · Score: 2, Funny

    When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it. Too late Eigenradio. The music industry has been doing this for years.

    --
    Got Shadowrun? Awakened Worlds
  60. What the fuck is up with Spamarrest?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there should be a story about spamarrest? I can't get my god damned mail! Did they go under?

  61. The radio = optimal music? by Smokinn · · Score: 1

    I'm going to have to stick with The Ataris on this one:

    Every now and then
    I turn it on again
    But it's plain to see
    That the radio still sucks

    --
    "We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal."
  62. Radio? Other interesting input sets include: by Atario · · Score: 1
    • Simon & Garfunkel + James Taylor + Bob Dylan
    • Marylin Manson + Tool + Nirvana
    • A bunch of Christmas carols + Dead Kennedys
    • TV theme songs + Gregorian chant
    • Eigenradion + itself
    Guys, give us a copy of the software to feed stuff into!
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  63. Dude, wrong window! by Captain+Entendre · · Score: 1

    Winamp isn't a web site at all. But if you don't like the UI, there's about a billion skins available.

  64. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by skintigh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you just defined ambient music.

    John Cage

  65. There really aren't any details by siskbc · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    IMHO this is yet another example of how academic projects are judged by the amount of attention they attract, rather than on whether they advance the state of the art. This is the reason why people like Kevin Warrick [sundayherald.com] can stick a dog tag in their arm and go around claiming they are the world's first cyborg - all while being lavished with attention by the mainstream media.

    Step 1: Invent retarted station based on an alphabet's soup of statistical techniques that have no relevance to anything

    Step 2: Publish this crap wherever will accept the junk

    Step 3: Pay Taco for a link on slashdot

    Step 4: Put out press release of your shitty project

    Step 5: Hope this helps your tenure outlook

    Step 6: Cut workload down to 10 hours/week. This is pretty close to profit.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  66. statistically optimal?? by Alpha_Nerd · · Score: 1

    I highly doubt that you can derive optimal music from music that is played on the radio...

  67. Re:"Sustainable"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    After listening to the station I must say this sounds like an alien transmission. We must notify SETI at once and prepare to welcome our new alien overlords.

  68. symphony? by Mr+Coffee+Cup · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'makes its optimal music by analyzing in real time dozens of radio stations at once. When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it. Since we listen to so much music all the time, Eigenradio is always on and always live.'

    That's all well and good, but what if more than half of those stations happen to be playing music that sucks? (even good stations use filler too..)

    1. Re:symphony? by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1
      That's all well and good, but what if more than half of those stations happen to be playing music that sucks?

      Thought there aren't a lot of details on the web site, I'm guessing that this is kind of the point. The first paragraph sounds like a subtle dig at musical conformity (however one wishes to define that) in a way that suggests that if you want to produce "optimal" product, you can go about it in a purely statistical manner.

      Or something.

      In some ways, this is similar to the "cut-up" technique used by Burroughs, et al, in the late '50s to come up with novel work using found sounds and words. It also reminds me a bit of Negativeland.

      I'm pretty sure these guys are having fun. Serious fun, but fun nonetheless. I mean, check out the titles of the tracks they've created!

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    2. Re:symphony? by Mr+Coffee+Cup · · Score: 1

      In a way that suggests that if you want to produce "optimal" product, you can go about it in a purely statistical manner.

      Very interesting idea, yes. I wonder what the result would be if the 'standards' of the various genres were used as weighted samples.

      Art is I guess, art. You bring your own preconceptions.. though it's anybody's guess how this accounts for similarities in taste. Perhaps it is that music is often a shared experience.. not just listening alone in the car on the way home from work. I find that my interests are similar to a lot of others, even across many genres. I guess the quality would then depend on the individual radio stations ability to guess those tastes.

    3. Re:symphony? by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 1
      I wonder what the result would be if the 'standards' of the various genres were used as weighted samples.

      I wondered about this, as well. It would be interesting to hear what the result set(s) would be if they analyzed streams of data from other sources. Like shortwave broadcasts from the middle-east or Africa. I mean, the stream currently produced is still somewhat recognizable as 4/4. The voices have an English flavour. There is an overall major-scale feel. What happens if you introduce odd (to western music) time signatures and scales? I wonder what a selection of modal free-jazz would end up sounding like? More free-form modal jazz?

      I think it would interesting to mix it up a little. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's had this idea. I expect we'll be hearing more from this Eigen-experiment over time.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  69. Re:more crap, just like the old crap by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    They are indeed a first-adjacent to you, but is your city of license Sacramento, or Davis? If it's Davis, you might not have much of a case, particularly if your protected 60 dBu contour doesn't include Sacramento. If it does, however, or if your COL is Sacramento, you have a good case to get them shut down.

    Incidentally, why didn't your chief engineer fight their application for a translator?

    -T

  70. Um.. It's a joke. Get it? by monk · · Score: 2, Informative

    The diagrams aren't intended to say anything, they're eye-noise just like the music is ear-noise. You're critiquing the ketchup stains on the table.

    If you need anymore clues we're here for ya, buddy.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  71. Mirror by Moonwick · · Score: 1

    I've managed to get a mirror up; http://64.5.58.149:81/ in your music player of choice should work, as long as I don't lose my connection to the main stream...

    Enjoy!

    --
    Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. But that begs the question is it the original or the reproduction that is making that god-awful noise.

    2. Re:Mirror by Moonwick · · Score: 1

      Heh, I was wondering that myself, but the original sounds just like the mirror...

      --
      Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
    3. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks dood u rock!

    4. Re:Mirror by Moonwick · · Score: 1

      Sorry, guys... lost my connection, and haven't been able to get back in.

      --
      Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
  72. How to download an M3U stream by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If you download the .m3u and rename it to text, you'll usually see an HTTP URI pointing to a .mp3 file. Wget that URI and then click stop after you've downloaded enough. Rumor has it that those few .ram files that include an HTTP stream (in addition to the proprietary PNM and Real's embraced-and-extended version of RTSP) can be downloaded in much the same way.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  73. calling it mine by bongobongo · · Score: 1

    i've actually sampled some of this before to use in my own electronic music. it feels very good to put the incoherently blended sounds of a bunch of annoying top 40 songs into a different (less obnoxious) context and call it my own. it's a constructive form of revenge for the pain they inflict on me via radios everywhere :)

  74. Optimal? by El · · Score: 1

    If you're listening to ClearChannel stations, then isn't it statistically mediocre music?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  75. Statistically optimal by El · · Score: 1

    Statistically, I'd say there's about a 100% probability that the site is slashdotted...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  76. Name of the station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It could be even cooler if they would write a name blender program to blend most popular station names together and then name their station after that result.

  77. I think you misunderstood. by zCyl · · Score: 3, Funny

    What makes you think that the slashdot effect changes the content of the music?

    Actually, I think what he was trying to say was something along the lines of:

    In Soviet Russia, music slashdots you.

  78. What limit do they have? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

    100? 500? 2500? Not enough for a gang of slashdot geeks anyway. I wish I could listen to it in a week.

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
  79. This is obviously a hoax by pmather · · Score: 1

    Come on you guys, look more closely...

    "All those stations, playing all that music, all the time! There's at least 40 different songs being played every week on most radio stations!"

    Yes, there are well over 40 songs out there. I think this is more of a prank than some sort of serious scientific thingie.

  80. Re:The RIAA/SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theyre contacting Darl to get pointers..

    zeke

  81. may I also suggest? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Blackalicious and KRS One.

    Also, the older Busta Rhymes (before he got to full of himself)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:may I also suggest? by sbillard · · Score: 1

      KRS One (aka Chris Parker) is the front man for Boogie Down Productions -
      Thanks for the reply - I'll check out Blackalicious

  82. Before you start naming things after him... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1


    maybe you should ask autopr0n first.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  83. Have you ever eaten in a dining hall or cafeteria by Gay+Nigger · · Score: 1
    ...and gotten bored with your food, so you start mixing together the melted ice cream with the ketchup, gravy and chunks of meatloaf to make a big, squishy mess?

    Now, think of the aural equivalent. Oh, real great.

  84. It might help if you knew how it worked... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    it doesn't really extract "musical themes" per se. It is a purely statistical engine, using simple filterbanks (FFT) to partition and quantify the sound. It then picks the "most statistically important" pieces back together in a semi-intelligent manner.

    This is sort of like taking a bunch of photos, taking all the common/important parts out, and stitching them into a new photo. I guarantee you it would look sort of like a person (cobbled together from different people) standing in front of a mixmash of backgrounds. Unless you like non-human subjects, in which case it looks like a cat.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:It might help if you knew how it worked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is sort of like taking a bunch of photos, taking all the common/important parts out, and stitching them into a new photo. I guarantee you it would look sort of like a person (cobbled together from different people) standing in front of a mixmash of backgrounds.
      Awesome! Do you know of anyone who's done this?
    2. Re:It might help if you knew how it worked... by pla · · Score: 1

      It is a purely statistical engine, using simple filterbanks (FFT) to partition and quantify the sound. It then picks the "most statistically important" pieces back together in a semi-intelligent manner.

      Fair enough...

      So might I change my suggestion to "Try using decaying weights for each bin it considers important"?

      Unless you really want that level of abrupt change, that would give you the same basic result, with somewhat smoother transitions.

      Cool idea, anyway. Wish I'd thought of it. :-)

  85. Eigenmoderators? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Sure, it looks like it might be insightful, but if you actually COMPREHENDED what he was saying, it was +1 Funny.

    m2 M-TWOOO!!!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  86. Glimpse of the future? by Kassiopeia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm slightly scared. This is a technological curiosity of its own might, granted, but this prompts me to envision a rather gloom future. Originally I've thought that the rise of networking would eliminate the entire corporate structure involved in music-making and be replaced with system where everyone can give a go at composing, publish their work online and where the best artists could probably managed to make quite a fortune with voluntary donations.

    However, could record companies do the ultimate thing, a la Nineteen Eighty-Four, and create a computer program that produces the music most of us want to hear? Would that mean the end of human creativity on that level of play, or would this algorithm be doomed to failure? It might only take a few years to adjust, and you'd end up liking it.

    Of course, a prudent question is, if music can be replicated so easily, what's the point in appreaciating it any longer, as it's clearly something even machines can do well...

    Next up: television series writing machines. But, oh wait, we already have reality tv...

    1. Re:Glimpse of the future? by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Well it may be possible to create computer programs to generate Britney Spears Pop Trash or weird instrumental "music." People might listen to it casually, perhaps teenyboppers may like it, but these programs won't be creating anything insightful, or anything artisic. At least not any time soon...

    2. Re:Glimpse of the future? by leery · · Score: 1

      listen to the thing and be reassured. the result in my opinion can only be loosely described as music, and is not only unpleasant, but to my ear sounds nothing like the music it purportedly replicates (unless maybe there's lots of static and noise and talk on some of those 20 stations).

      on the other hand, be reassured in another way: this noise is actually more interesting than much of the cookie-cutter product being generated by the industry today.

      --
      "This is not a sig." -- R.
  87. Eh, in a sense, they are... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    just pick some "feature", maybe filterbanked sets of coefficients from the time series, and call that a vector. Collect them over the sources, and evolve a set of eigenvectors that pick out the prinicple components of that space. Use relative eigenvalues from each source to pick a "dominant" represent set for the output.

    Transform back, and what do you have... weird shit!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  88. SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION!!! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    figures. Anyone want to guess that the vectors of the state space are coefficients of a very common filterbank over the radio's time series, and there are as many as there are input stations?

    Yeagh for MATLAB!!!!!!!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  89. Like the infamous potato salad by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    in Wayside School is falling down.

    How was she?

    Delicious!

    So can I join the GNAA now?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  90. common base for musical taste? by ratfynk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So if you listen to modern Turkish in 7/4 and a 4 beat rock. Though in a little Jamaica and you will get Garth Brooks? Whenever you try to quantify music to find the ultimate groove you will get the ultimate in mediocre shlock. I once really tried to listen to an ultra post modern new music concert. The host stated that the music was written in a post modern a-tonal non serial fashion and was a-rythmic generated chance. The composer had then orchestrated some of the results. After really giving the music full attention and every chance to do something for me, I came to the conclusion that the result was decidedly A MUSICAL. I also came to the conclusion that the school of music that this composer was associated with was filled with air heads behind desks that most likely gave up actually playing real musical instruments after graduating from where ever. The musicians in the Orchestra gave it their best shot, which was rather sad. The applause was perfunctory so the lack of an encore was very much appreciated. If the composer/conductor had prepared one it will just have to wait.

    Statistical analysis is just not the way to write music, except perhaps for tone deaf nerds, and record execs. You have every right to play whatever form of music you choose. I have every right to listen to something else! If it got groove I do not care. I have never heard any computer generated music that can even come close to a great composer or musician, the differences are obvious. What appeals to the audiance is never the way to write music. It is how to please record companies, but is artless garbage that is as quickly forgotten as fast as it is created.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  91. ObLousyHumor: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    1. Collect radio stations
    2. ?
    3. Profit!
    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  92. Clear Channel is actually playing Autechre! by Quazi · · Score: 1

    I'm listening to it right now and it sounds like I'm between stations on an AM radio. I used to be intrigued by trying to tune into AM radio stations at night to see if I could hear one that was hundreds of miles away, but now I listen to Autechre to get the same effect. There's no discernible melody, but there is 'musical' structure.

    This radio station gets me to thinking: since Clear Channel runs the music selection on most radio stations, and by playing the most popular frequencies of 40+ stations you end up with no discernible melody but 'musical' structure, could this be the only way Autechre makes it to the radio?

    1. Re:Clear Channel is actually playing Autechre! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I find eigenradio more listenable than autechre. I've been listening to it for an hour now, and I'm pretty sure I've never managed to listen to autechre for an hour beefore.

  93. /. effect on music by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Too bad the /. effect is not permanent.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  94. Shake... that... thing... by OwlBoy · · Score: 1

    I was listening for quite some time, maybe 10 mins or more, and all of a sudden that song came on, and took over for a good 2 mins! What maddness

  95. Uhm ... yeah! by jstockdale · · Score: 1

    We'll give you our women ...

    (looks around and realizes this is /.) ... nevermind

    But we will give you our money!!!

    (looks around and sees gooey reminants of IT bubble) ... why do I even try anymore ... (mopes away)

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  96. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    he's clearly trying to make you suffer.

  97. No, but here's what I was thinking of... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    http://home.cvc.org/acc/ugly/jw.jpg

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  98. Right.... by billybob · · Score: 1

    A common way to do this is to replay the last buffer. If the outage is long this tends to generate a metallic buzz if the buffer is short and a "Max Headroom"-style stutter if the buffer is long.

    I dont know what player *YOU* use, but I've never had a player that replays the last buffer. All I've ever used just completely stops, waiting for the data to come in... Of course, I'm not uber l33t lunix hax0r that you sound to be.

    ^_^

    --
    Joseph?
  99. Three main questions: by Lord+Custos · · Score: 1

    Three main questions:
    1) Whua!?
    2) Sucks or Rocks?
    3) Copyright ramifications? I'm sure the RIAA will blow a gasket if these MIT people get this thing to work.

  100. Blipverts! by JasonMaggini · · Score: 1

    Brought to you by Network 23!

    *BOOM*

  101. cute, but trivial application of PCA by mooface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who takes an intermediate signal processing class learns about Princ. Component Analysis (PCA). Loosely, it attempts to represent a set of signals as weighted, linear combinations of sub-signals..... The technique allows you to find the pieces of signal that are common to the overall set. In this case I'm sure they are lining up some radio feeds, performing PCA, doing a little trivial stuff to it, and synthesizing their own "music" based on some transformation of the PCA weights and computed vectors. Not a big deal -- more like a one afternoon project for a grad student, or maybe a class project for a few undergrads...

  102. They are clever... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Usually you use an pick_region->apply_weighted_window->transform->man ipulate->untransform->overlap->add->move_half_wind ow_width
    procedure. This prevents discontinuity across block boundaries, and prevents aliasing (high frequencies -> low frequencies and vice versa during transform).

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  103. wonderful organized noise is good, try Aphex Twin by gasgesgos · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aphex Twin's music has done this for me. At first it just sounds like crappy noise randomly generated, but then you just "get it"...

    Aphex Twin's music spans all forms of electronic music, Selected Ambient Works Vol. 2 is an incredibly WONDERFUL bedtime album, while Drukqs is a great album while working... There's something about the almost chaotic aspect of it that keeps my mind focused.

    It's tough to go back to listening to mainstream radio after experiencing music that changes a person's perspective.

    To anyone who ignores/avoids ambient music, or music like most of the Aphex Twin library, I give the same advice, just keep listening, and wait... Eventually, it'll just click, and you win.

  104. Bit Torrent Mirror Up by arctan1701 · · Score: 2, Informative

    here are two sample mp3's from when i could access the servers. i'll keep the torrents up for a couple of hours or until the server dies...

    .zip of two .torrent files

  105. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by pj737 · · Score: 1
    Then after listening to a LOT of it, especially the stuff that you know was actually composed by a human, something new happens: You start to listen to the world around you (traffic, nature, conversations) as if it was composed. Imagining a single intention behind the noise of the world. It really is a beautiful mindset. See the restaurant scene in the movie "32 Short Films About Glenn Gould." http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0108328/ [imdb.com]

    Whooahhh! Can I ask what you're smoking?

  106. Random rant about this kind of music analysis by Daniel_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computers writing music will never happen. At some level, it will always be people using computers as tools to write music. But we have that already (ie Mixing of music).

    First off, this is a single aleotoric (sp?) composition that is extremely similar to John Cage's 'radio symphony' produced a while ago (I don't remember the date or the exact title, but I'm sure someone will correct (or flame) me about it :-)) What classifies this as a music composition? It makes a number of algorithmic choices to create a new sound.

    Even with the lack of posted details about the algorithm, there are a number of assumptions in the algorithm that explain some of the impressions reported on Slashdot.

    "Eigenradio plays only the most important frequencies..." - right off the bat, we're assuming that frequencies are important to how we listen to music. Research in psychoacoustics suggests that this isn't the case - we stream music into 'parts' organized by the start and stop points of frequency bands. These streams are then processed for whether the pitch/timbre/rhythm patterns are recognized or not. This is partially demonstrated by the way we talk of 'voices' or 'instruments' having pitch and color (timbre) and of particular songs having 'a good groove'. Any diagram describing this kind of process would have feedback accross the whole diagram, so I doubt its a part of the algorithm used.

    "...only the beats with the highest entropy..." Repetition is a feature of all music everywhere - the only musical universal known. Similarly, the 'ideal' degree of entropy in music (how much it repeats) tends to be suprisingly high - music with the highest entropy is actually 'bad'. This differs from culture to culture, but low entropy in good music is the norm, not the exception. Music that has 'high entropy' as a feature already have two strikes against it.

    "If you took a bunch of music and asked it, 'Music, what are you, really?' you'd hear Eigenradio singing back at you." This assumes that all music is uniform and can be summaraized into a single source. Contrary to this assumption, there are significant differences between genre types - they exploit different mechanisms for producing pleasure in their listeners. This doesn't even begin to touch non-Western music (even non western pop music). Some of these mechanisms are mutually exclusive (polyphonic music versus homophonic music). An 'average' or 'distilled' reproduction ends up activating no psychological hooks very well and ends up sounding boring.

    "They know what you really want to hear. " This assumes that the creator can know what "music" is for you. Each culture hears music differently - with different qualifications for what makes music 'good'. Brain scans of trained classical musicians and their untrained counterparts conducted both in Japan and in the US demonstrated differences in the way these sounds were processed among the four groups. The differences between trained and untrained listeners was radical. Not only do tastes differ, but the music you hear is not the same music I hear - even if the same sound is presented. No single piece of music can legitimately make this claim.

    --
    The number you have dialed is imaginary, please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
  107. ... reve etis bew dengised tsroW:eR by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    !thgir ot tfel nettirw SI hsilngE; thgir er'uoY

    ... llew sa sdrawkcab sgat LMTH eseht etirw dluoc ylno fi, woN

  108. The acronyms from the image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PCA-box in the image is for probably Principal Component Analysis. This is statistical method using, among other things, eigenvalues.

    What could the other boxes be?

  109. Oh yummy! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    "When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it."

    I heard all this SHIT on the radio today, so it must be good.

    I mean, four billion flies like shit, so who am I to argue?

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  110. That reminds me of hand dancing. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    When we're in a restaurant, and they're playing the music too loud, and the waitress is taking forever to get there, I don't get mad.

    I just start hand dancing. That is, I choreograph my hands, maybe my head/eye motions, to the music, with only the most subtle motions. That drives my wife crazy, but amuses me. Actually, it amuses her too; she starts laughing, and then says "stop it." But it passes the time.

    But it gave me an idea for a music video, in which they play the music, and the band is there, playing, and the people are there, frozen in time, just standing around, but then as you look more closely, you see that they actually are dancing in a rather complicated, interesting dance.

    Then, at the end, you finish up with something like a bit of sheet music falling down, or a lady's ring dropping, or maybe with everybody stopping, and stretching, talking, and going out afterwards.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  111. MIT hackers jump the shark by js7a · · Score: 1

    I remember the days when MIT hackers would do interesting things and explain them well.

  112. espabila Fidel, que llega Raquel by bodrell · · Score: 1
    Espabilar means several things--

    The best translation I can give is "to get with it," although it also means apurar (hurry up), and sometimes "wake up" also. "Espabilado" means "on the ball," "street smart," and "brilliant" (like a source of light). Si usted quiere saber por que la palavra parece muy rara, es porque no se usa mucho en mexico o espana--pero es comun en otras partes del mundo latino, especialmente centroamerica.

    But I think what you want to know is where that confounded quote came from. It's from a song by Mano Negra (fronted by Manu Chao), called "La Vida"(sorry about the backdround image). They have songs in Spanish, English, French, and Farsi. Manu Chao has a couple songs in Portuguese, too.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:espabila Fidel, que llega Raquel by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Gracias. He vivido en Costa Rica hace tres anos, y siempre quiero mejorar mi espanol. Nunca he escuchado (o por lo menos, notado) esa palabra.

      (Hmm. I can't convince slashdot to include tildes and accents.)

  113. Sorry, folks, but it has to be said... by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1
    1. Horizontal scrolling required
    2. Tiny
    3. Virtually no links to anything
    4. Very small amount of information

    5. Profit!

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  114. Isn't there a point to being unique? by forgoil · · Score: 1

    All the great ones has done something new. Maybe not something completely new (all the notes has been hit before;)), but never the less not what the rest was doing. We have the king, beatles, and then all the waves, such as rap, punk, grunge, NWBHM (let's see if anyone knows that one), etc.

    This reminds me of what happened when Beatles hit it big and all of a sudden if you showed up with two guitars the labels hired you...

    But then again, not much of the new music comming out is worth listening to, horrible mixes (my ears tire, and I don't have good music ears), bland, homogenus. I don't want to be bored nor shocked, I want to be entertained.

  115. i laughed... by kendoka · · Score: 1

    the 'music' actually sounds pretty shitty. I agree it's an exciting project - it's just funny that the end result of MIT brilliance is a song not on par with Vanilla Ice...

  116. Eigenradio is to music as... by leftie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Cmdr. Data is to stand-up comedy. ("Take my Worf, please.") Technically, this is not an original concept, as Data basically was doing almost exactly this in one scene in an episode. He had like 7 different pieces of music playing cranked at the same time that he was listening to/analysing when LeForge entered the scene and screamed at him to make it stop (or at least just play one... or something like that). 1) I agree with LeForge on this. Make it stop. 2) Does this mean Universal has a copyright for Eigenradio already?

  117. Re:wonderful organized noise is good, try Aphex Tw by Briareos · · Score: 1
    Aphex Twin's music has done this for me. At first it just sounds like crappy noise randomly generated, but then you just "get it"...

    I dunno, but most of Aphex's stuff doesn't sound that strange. Autechre's latest albums, on the other hand, do - especially since most phrases were algorithmically generated and then hand-selected by Sean and Rob.

    Or take almost anything made by Fennesz. Or T.Raumschmiere.

    (Disclaimer: I own almost anything by Aphex Twin [except for the really obscure and hard-to-get stuff, but only rarely listen to any of it anymore... and lately, I much prefer to play dubby, ambient stuff like Basic Channel, Gas, Pole, Deadbeat while I'm doing something...)

    np: Thomas Fehlmenn - Decke (Visions Of Blah)

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  118. By Eigen do they mean summation by lob5ter · · Score: 1

    It is indeed like listening to 20 radio stations - all through the same set of speakers :o(

    Inflamatory - Yes!
    Funny - Hopefully!

  119. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by krilli · · Score: 1

    Totally.

    After really trying to like Autechre's Confield album and failing, I started noticing really interesting things.

    For example, once when I was driving around in a loaner Hyundai on a gravel road. The car had only minimal noise insulation and the pinging, metallic bursts of the fine gravel hitting the wheel arches was sort of like waves, but I could listen to it as a whole sound or many small sounds. Or try both at the same time. In stereo, of course.

    Then I noticed the bass of the wind - at the limits of my hearing. The lowest of the low, gigantic, sounding with the most effortless immense force and unfocused. Really rather scary.

    Then the engine, which I decided would be the melody in this case. It took a little coercing of my brain, but it worked out. It's not that much different than some weird far-away-indigenous music i've heard.

    And it was nice. The real world is pretty god damn hi-fi, too.

    Note: I drive sober.

    --
    Jag pratar lite svenska.
  120. I think I've come to a conclusion.... by popmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Humans can make music using computers.
    Computers can't make music using computers.

    Or even radio stations.

    The very idea is disgusting. Has people forgot how
    good real and sincere music, played live by people
    playing it for the love of it sounds like?
    This only reminds how disgutingly consumer-based
    our society is.

    1. Re:I think I've come to a conclusion.... by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1


      #@&(#%&@#($%@&#$(@&#!!!!!

  121. Ring Mod? by gidds · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else find that sort of metallic noise familiar? It sounds uncannily like the effect of an audio processor called a ring modulator - also known as a multiplier. What's the betting they're just multiplying together all the inputs?

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  122. Re: Copyright Violation by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
    In addition to fair use, mentioned in an older sibling post to this one, there are several types of use which are legal and thus not infringement.

    One is non-originality. When part of a song is not original to the artist, the copyright on the song does not cover the non-original part. Of course, someone else might have a copyright on it.

    Another is de minimus use. Some samples, if they are very short, are simply too short for the law to pay attention - "the law does not concern itself with trifles" is the usual quote. But in music, this might be a very short time-length sample, probably less than a second. Eigenradio makes its optimal music by analyzing in real time dozens of radio stations at once. When our bank of computers has heard enough music, it will go to work on making more just like it.

    This quote from their site seems to indicate that they synthesize their broadcast based on an analysis of various other broadcasts. But, now that I am listiening to the station, it seems to be made at least partly of sampling (at least the voices).

    If the music is originally synthesized, even if based on an analysis of actual music, I don't see how this would be an infringement - I mean, surely one could analyze multiple paintings from various artists and then compose a composition based on the results (most common hues, subjects, etc.).

    But if any parts are reused, even if transformed, I am pretty sure infringement could be found. The courts would likely apply the usual "substantial similarity" tests.

  123. What's up with the song titles? :-) by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    - Haddock 0011 Pea Gallows
    - Beer Cube

    lol

    The titles are even more weird than the music. I wonder what they're based on. OK, now I need to listen to "Insurance Century". See ya!

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:What's up with the song titles? :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      http://web.media.mit.edu/~bwhitman/10000.html

      they seem to be using many from this list, according to the PPS

  124. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like he hate some magic mushrooms to me.

  125. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this one time I was taking this magic carpet ride, and all of the pixies started signing for me, fun stuff.

  126. Re:wonderful organized noise is good for you. try by mrtrumbe · · Score: 1
    The poster wan't talking about Eigenradio specifically. Rather, as he said, music that was actually composed by a human.

    Not that I'm saying you would like ambient music composed by a human any more than you liked Eigenradio. But it is different.

    FWIW, I didn't like ambient music (or avant garde music, depending on who you ask) the first time I heard it. I bought a few CDs, hated it, and put it down for a few months. But then I started to listen to other groups that include elements of ambient music. Bands like Gastr Del Sol, Godspeed You Black Emperor, Sigur Ros (hell, even Radiohead and Wilco to some degree) have all pushed the boundaries of what has been considered music. They all employ unique sounds and noises to create something different than what your used to listening to. And they are all far more accessible than purely ambient music.

    These bands also brought to a point where I could "get" ambient music. Now I can listen to a Jim O'Rourke or Fenno'berg album and actually enjoy it.

    Not that I'm recommending everyone should try this. I like it, but that doesn't make it better than your music.

    Taft

  127. Re:You are a d-less wondor by FxChiP · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ, I love those ISR jokes :)

  128. Re:You are a d-less wondor by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, ISR jokes love YOU!

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  129. but have you gotSheep? by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    http://www.gotSheep.com
    Yup, I collect them. And the reside quite happily out in the front yard :)

  130. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but does it work in Linux?!

  131. Clearwater on more channels? by svzurich · · Score: 1

    Just what I need, a program listening to Clearwater channels and making more pop crap just like they play! No thanks, sticking to rock, preferably classic rock. I want music worth listening to, and that I am able to enjoy.

  132. Similar by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Shirley & Spinoza without the skits.

    MjM

    Groovy. Gear. Mod.

  133. AutoPr0n by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 0

    Sounds like masturbating to erotic pictures of yourself.