They have developed an IP-based method of communicating with the TV hardware itself. That will be open-sourced, along with the rest of it, in 2011. It combines internet media with traditional TV channels, seamlessly. I watched the stream, and it looked pretty interesting. How many adverts they can throw at you, however, remains to be seen.
No, they reckon it costs over $700k to check each and every individual computer Gary had access to, to make sure he didn't leave anything on them or change anything. You'd have to be off your nut to just change the passwords after a massive breach, however idiotic the initial breach was.
It only seems to do that when you have configured it to send usage statistics back to Google. It must be for tracking, as the server sends nothing back (even going so far as sending a 204 instead of 200).
The actual users of it think it's fantastically serious. Lots of people, though, laugh their asses off at it. As you can see from merely visiting it, editing it is a much harder endeavour, and all changes are watched very closely. It's retarded.
Why not just get a second SIM from your mobile phone provider, then put that in your notebook/netbook/whatever. The only difference is you don't get instant access to the data on your phone from your computer, but then you can still copy it across using USB, Bluetooth, or WiFi, and take calls while using your data connection.
All the best to them, but god-damned that looks like some generic pap right there. "Gate-keepers"? Never heard that one before! A spaulder on a single shoulder? Original! It seems rather obvious that there's no decent F/OSS script creator:-P
Win + # where # is the number of the icon in the task bar. Seems to work perfectly in Windows 7. You can also add your own customised shortcuts to the task bar, negating your whine entirely;)
It depends on the country. Many have laws requiring firearm owners have suitable secure storage for their weapons. So yeah, if you screw up, you get in trouble.
No scientist assumes all we can see is all there is, only that all we can see is all we can see. The age of the universe, and the things in it, are not being constantly adjusted by large amounts, but are being gradually refined as measurements become more accurate.
There was one physicist who claimed that the big bang was intrinsically-connected to a large, sudden change in the speed of light. I saw a programme on the BBC about it a few years back.
You only use the document markup language to create the layout. Everything else is scripted. The script itself defines which HTML is used, not the other way round. Also, h.264 works fine on my Pre.
Christ. Give it a rest. No one blames GWB for the hurricane, but some definitely blame him for his complete lack of action after the hurricane hit, causing deaths and massive loss.
The Queen can only call for a do-over, and that hasn't happened for centuries. She's not riding in and bossing people around, just calling out the politicians' inability to get their shit together. Why does that get you all scared? Weird.
1. Adobe are constantly making it faster. They've been doing that with every release. Whether people actually code it correctly is another thing. They've been constantly updating the GPU acceleration, memory footprint, etc. 2. I can't tell when a site is using flash - it has no visible performance hit on any of my PCs. 3. So is HTML in general...
That's bullshit. Plenty of people give money to those without just because they have money, and those without, don't. Not to feel good, but because they see something they can do to help, and choose to help.
The cellphone in question needs service in order to send. As does the satellite phone. But satellite phones, by their very nature, do not need ground-based infrastructure relatively close to the user in order to send data. Cellphones do. You can't go out into the middle of the jungle, or as Tesla says, in the middle of the sea, and expect to communicate with your Ericsson PCS phone;)
That's a lot of ass-delving you did there. Very impressive. You should write comics.
They have developed an IP-based method of communicating with the TV hardware itself. That will be open-sourced, along with the rest of it, in 2011. It combines internet media with traditional TV channels, seamlessly. I watched the stream, and it looked pretty interesting. How many adverts they can throw at you, however, remains to be seen.
It also didn't become popular because it's terrible when compared to more modern codecs.
No, they reckon it costs over $700k to check each and every individual computer Gary had access to, to make sure he didn't leave anything on them or change anything. You'd have to be off your nut to just change the passwords after a massive breach, however idiotic the initial breach was.
Paranoid much? If you are that far gone, you might as well simply unplug your computer and spend all your savings on tin foil.
It only seems to do that when you have configured it to send usage statistics back to Google. It must be for tracking, as the server sends nothing back (even going so far as sending a 204 instead of 200).
I didn't think TPB was running a tracker - I thought they turned that off ages ago.
The actual users of it think it's fantastically serious. Lots of people, though, laugh their asses off at it. As you can see from merely visiting it, editing it is a much harder endeavour, and all changes are watched very closely. It's retarded.
Why not just get a second SIM from your mobile phone provider, then put that in your notebook/netbook/whatever. The only difference is you don't get instant access to the data on your phone from your computer, but then you can still copy it across using USB, Bluetooth, or WiFi, and take calls while using your data connection.
The marketing.
All the best to them, but god-damned that looks like some generic pap right there. "Gate-keepers"? Never heard that one before! A spaulder on a single shoulder? Original! It seems rather obvious that there's no decent F/OSS script creator :-P
You should read the posts above that show why the transmission in a Prius isn't anything like this. Just having two inputs doesn't make it similar.
Win + # where # is the number of the icon in the task bar. Seems to work perfectly in Windows 7. You can also add your own customised shortcuts to the task bar, negating your whine entirely ;)
It depends on the country. Many have laws requiring firearm owners have suitable secure storage for their weapons. So yeah, if you screw up, you get in trouble.
No scientist assumes all we can see is all there is, only that all we can see is all we can see. The age of the universe, and the things in it, are not being constantly adjusted by large amounts, but are being gradually refined as measurements become more accurate.
There was one physicist who claimed that the big bang was intrinsically-connected to a large, sudden change in the speed of light. I saw a programme on the BBC about it a few years back.
You only use the document markup language to create the layout. Everything else is scripted. The script itself defines which HTML is used, not the other way round. Also, h.264 works fine on my Pre.
Christ. Give it a rest. No one blames GWB for the hurricane, but some definitely blame him for his complete lack of action after the hurricane hit, causing deaths and massive loss.
The Queen can only call for a do-over, and that hasn't happened for centuries. She's not riding in and bossing people around, just calling out the politicians' inability to get their shit together. Why does that get you all scared? Weird.
1. Adobe are constantly making it faster. They've been doing that with every release. Whether people actually code it correctly is another thing. They've been constantly updating the GPU acceleration, memory footprint, etc.
2. I can't tell when a site is using flash - it has no visible performance hit on any of my PCs.
3. So is HTML in general...
That's bullshit. Plenty of people give money to those without just because they have money, and those without, don't. Not to feel good, but because they see something they can do to help, and choose to help.
Exactly - you have to have at least one lossy conversion, so why insist on more as if it won't hurt the final listening?
The cellphone in question needs service in order to send. As does the satellite phone. But satellite phones, by their very nature, do not need ground-based infrastructure relatively close to the user in order to send data. Cellphones do. You can't go out into the middle of the jungle, or as Tesla says, in the middle of the sea, and expect to communicate with your Ericsson PCS phone ;)
He didn't mention Theora ONCE! The bastard!
Replace 'technically' with 'pedantically', and you're spot on :)