You don't need to market drugs if you're planning on selling to national health services. You bring your drugs to them, show them how good they are, and if they're better than the current drugs, they'll be bought in bulk, covering your costs. You only need to market drugs which don't sell themselves, or if you're marketing to people who don't care about efficacy (like to end-patients on TV in the US and NZ), or buying off doctors (US).
It might look good on the surface but there are still dangerous areas, and the wildlife isn't faring as good as you seem to think it does. The exclusion zone is demonstrably necessary.
OK - I've looked, and they seem fine to me. Want to try making a more substantive argument? Maybe with examples and evidence your examples are not outliers?
I bet that sounded awesome in your head! The problem is that any change requires effort from people involved, and people won't want to spend that effort until the very last moment, when they have no chance but to.
Who does this? Seriously? It sounds like whoever is copying and pasting IP addresses has already screwed something larger up before getting to this point...
The fact you consume media which is copyrighted, and rely on people who likewise are informed by copyrighted material, it seems you are simply unaware of the importance of copyright in your life, and have assumed that if you don't know something that something doesn't matter.
What is wrong in your head? You're a mess. SJWs? That term used by people who want to be racist/misogynist but who don't want to be called racist/misogynist? Wonderful.
You're showing your ingorance now - Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program before the Iran Deal. Their leaders had issued a fatwa banning nuclear weapons in Islamic countries. The international community, including intelligence services such as the CIA, Mossad, and MI6, all agreed that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons.
His history of bankruptcies shows that's not the case. His lack of understanding of basic economic ideas also shows he's not great at this. All he's good at is saying he's great at stuff - actually being great at anything applicable to being a president seems beyond him.
It's not biologically correct, either, as that will destroy them, turning them into a monoculture devoid of all the interesting and useful life discovered inside it. Not to mention the people who live there might not be too happy about it.
I love the idea of dollar stores in places like that - walk in with a dollar and can't afford anything. It's insanity!
No, they'll go up because they can simply raise the prices because the US hasn't figured this out yet.
You don't need to market drugs if you're planning on selling to national health services. You bring your drugs to them, show them how good they are, and if they're better than the current drugs, they'll be bought in bulk, covering your costs. You only need to market drugs which don't sell themselves, or if you're marketing to people who don't care about efficacy (like to end-patients on TV in the US and NZ), or buying off doctors (US).
Your information is about 10 years out of date.
It might look good on the surface but there are still dangerous areas, and the wildlife isn't faring as good as you seem to think it does. The exclusion zone is demonstrably necessary.
That is about being still, not being cloudy. The OP stated both happening at the same time, you stated one happening.
"sizeable". Exactly. Lucrative just means making a non-trivial amount (not necessarily lots) of money.
Unfortunately none of that is evidence, so there is nothing to dismiss.
Followed, very quickly, by a full military attack, at which point popping down the shops for some haribos and milk is probably off the cards.
How do you manage to keep safe from these imaginary brown people?? You poor snowflake!
Apart from the rampant, rampant fraud the cards were brought in to mitigate, they were perfect!
Or maybe people recognise this approach uses less concrete, and so is indeed an improvement.
It's more "dung" or "faeces" than "shit".
OK - I've looked, and they seem fine to me. Want to try making a more substantive argument? Maybe with examples and evidence your examples are not outliers?
Did you mean to have a discussion with yourself?
I bet that sounded awesome in your head! The problem is that any change requires effort from people involved, and people won't want to spend that effort until the very last moment, when they have no chance but to.
It's quite the opposite, actually. IPv6 can do wonders for privacy.
Who does this? Seriously? It sounds like whoever is copying and pasting IP addresses has already screwed something larger up before getting to this point...
You are making a bunch of mistakes in your description of IPv6. You might want to stop.
The fact you consume media which is copyrighted, and rely on people who likewise are informed by copyrighted material, it seems you are simply unaware of the importance of copyright in your life, and have assumed that if you don't know something that something doesn't matter.
What is wrong in your head? You're a mess. SJWs? That term used by people who want to be racist/misogynist but who don't want to be called racist/misogynist? Wonderful.
Arguing your incredulity is not a very wise thing. Something can be true even if you don't think it is.
You're showing your ingorance now - Iran didn't have a nuclear weapons program before the Iran Deal. Their leaders had issued a fatwa banning nuclear weapons in Islamic countries. The international community, including intelligence services such as the CIA, Mossad, and MI6, all agreed that Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons.
Please stop lying.
His history of bankruptcies shows that's not the case. His lack of understanding of basic economic ideas also shows he's not great at this. All he's good at is saying he's great at stuff - actually being great at anything applicable to being a president seems beyond him.
It's not biologically correct, either, as that will destroy them, turning them into a monoculture devoid of all the interesting and useful life discovered inside it. Not to mention the people who live there might not be too happy about it.