Seeing as the actual lamb which did all the shit (again and again and again and again) is as venerated as Jesus for [insert weird reasons here], that's the best anyone can hope for. Remember: when something is intrinsically irrational, any attempts to curtail it will appear irrational from its perspective. You seem to have figured out the latter part, but not yet the former.
And if you read what "jihad" means, you'd know it doesn't automatically mean violence, just a concerted effort to improve something. But yeah I know - scary scary brown people terrrrist words, so must be bad.
Apart from when Russia hacked the DNC and released the emails to stir up controversy (even though eventually nothing damning was found in them), which Trump apparently knew of before the emails were released.
And as for the CIA, two wrongs don't make a right.
Seeing as there is an inverse relationship between disliking of refugees and exposure to refugees, I'd say your guess is almost entirely incorrect. Evidence suggests that the more refugees people meet the less they dislike them. I've spent plenty of time visiting refugee centres here in Germany and have no problem with refugees. Some are assholes, but that's humanity for you.
It would help your argument if you didn't use massive generalisations, and realise that limits to speech must always exist, if even just to protect freedom of speech. Popper wrote a fair bit on this.
You might want to learn what hate speech is before proudly telling everyone you have no idea yet disapprove of it anyway. It's perplexing. Complaining about a company delivering poor service or products is not hate speech. I guess it would be great for your argument if it was, but that really isn't the case.
The money on ads wasn't the entire problem, though. The grass-roots campaigns funded by and coordinated out of Russia were the real threat. It's weird you don't seem to care about foreign governments controlling your own. I guess if they're not libs it's fine, right?
As the drowned were not from Africa, mentioning that seems rather bizarre. You might as well mention the new flavours of Haribo, as that has just as much to do with it. Of course you won't, as racists gonna racist. "Fugitives" - grow up. You sound incredibly scared.
You would sooner leap to some racist conclusion completely at odds with the official statistics? Maybe that's why the MSM isn't discussing it in Europe - it's racist nonsense.
It absolutely is, as it is paid for by everyone who can afford it, regardless of whether they use it or not, as it benefits society as a whole. The same goes for the armed forces, too.
One can correct trade imbalances through negotiation, not scorched earth policies. Trump might mean well, but this is killing jobs when it doesn't need to.
Hardly - do you know how difficult it would be to swing a vote through this method, compared to silently flipping some bits or simply coercing the electorate through emotive social media campaigns?
True, but seeing as the US is in spot #31 on that list and spends more tax-payers money on health per capita than any country above it, you can see something is inherently wrong with healthcare in the US.
This is not a question of technology, and the EU has a long history of protecting consumers. The last sentence shows you don't understand how the EU works, which makes your desire to criticise it baffling.
Slashdot Mirror
Seeing as the actual lamb which did all the shit (again and again and again and again) is as venerated as Jesus for [insert weird reasons here], that's the best anyone can hope for. Remember: when something is intrinsically irrational, any attempts to curtail it will appear irrational from its perspective. You seem to have figured out the latter part, but not yet the former.
And if you read what "jihad" means, you'd know it doesn't automatically mean violence, just a concerted effort to improve something. But yeah I know - scary scary brown people terrrrist words, so must be bad.
Engaging in breathless whataboutism does not reflect particularly well on you or your argument.
Apart from when Russia hacked the DNC and released the emails to stir up controversy (even though eventually nothing damning was found in them), which Trump apparently knew of before the emails were released.
And as for the CIA, two wrongs don't make a right.
Seeing as there is an inverse relationship between disliking of refugees and exposure to refugees, I'd say your guess is almost entirely incorrect. Evidence suggests that the more refugees people meet the less they dislike them. I've spent plenty of time visiting refugee centres here in Germany and have no problem with refugees. Some are assholes, but that's humanity for you.
It would help your argument if you didn't use massive generalisations, and realise that limits to speech must always exist, if even just to protect freedom of speech. Popper wrote a fair bit on this.
You might want to learn what hate speech is before proudly telling everyone you have no idea yet disapprove of it anyway. It's perplexing. Complaining about a company delivering poor service or products is not hate speech. I guess it would be great for your argument if it was, but that really isn't the case.
The money on ads wasn't the entire problem, though. The grass-roots campaigns funded by and coordinated out of Russia were the real threat. It's weird you don't seem to care about foreign governments controlling your own. I guess if they're not libs it's fine, right?
The desperation, lies, misleading and just plain false claims in this thread are truly entertaining at this point.
If they're really upsetting you, stop posting them.
You seem confused.
You're like a sad little stuck record. Your life must be hell.
As the drowned were not from Africa, mentioning that seems rather bizarre. You might as well mention the new flavours of Haribo, as that has just as much to do with it. Of course you won't, as racists gonna racist. "Fugitives" - grow up. You sound incredibly scared.
Two points:
1. Germany received far less migrants than that
2. These weren't immigrants.
Your racism is especially lazy.
You would sooner leap to some racist conclusion completely at odds with the official statistics? Maybe that's why the MSM isn't discussing it in Europe - it's racist nonsense.
It absolutely is, as it is paid for by everyone who can afford it, regardless of whether they use it or not, as it benefits society as a whole. The same goes for the armed forces, too.
That's what happens when the government is in the pocket of business. If it isn't, then that doesn't happen.
One can correct trade imbalances through negotiation, not scorched earth policies. Trump might mean well, but this is killing jobs when it doesn't need to.
Hardly - do you know how difficult it would be to swing a vote through this method, compared to silently flipping some bits or simply coercing the electorate through emotive social media campaigns?
As you say, they just need to target swing states, so it's more a question of a handful of systems, not 50.
You seem confused by how insurance works. You might want to figure that out before getting angry at the wrong thing.
True, but seeing as the US is in spot #31 on that list and spends more tax-payers money on health per capita than any country above it, you can see something is inherently wrong with healthcare in the US.
That's not Libertarian in the slightest. "Fuck you I've got mine" is more like it.
That the way Trump wishes to do it is indistinguishable from someone who is compromised and being used. That's the scary part.
Yes - people misunderstanding what the EU is and what it is doing.
Like you seem to be doing.
This is not a question of technology, and the EU has a long history of protecting consumers. The last sentence shows you don't understand how the EU works, which makes your desire to criticise it baffling.