So you've not read the IPCC reports. That is a rather large condemnation of your position, as you are railing against something that exists only in your mind. Your argument is extremely childish.
You might want to spend your time reading about this as opposed to posting your ignorance on slashdot... If you really cared to know the answers to your questions, you would have answered them yourself.
There you go again giving us a glimpse into your bleak, depressed, scared little life. Run along now and play with the other xenophobes - the grown-ups are talking.
Was that supposed to be an argument? It sounds like poorly-informed, reactionary, childish logic to me. After all, if the wives and daughters you mention get attacked, with your wonderful logic their attackers also have guns. Yay for reactionary thinking! Boo logic!
I thought the mantra was that gun owners are responsible. If they forget they have a loaded gun on them, they are clearly not responsible, by the very definition of the word.
Comparing those taxis to modern electric vehicles is ridiculous. Yes, they both are "electric", have wheels, and carry people for money, but that's pretty much where the similarity ends. Your feigned indignation is very transparent.
If it's heavily-mapped, the car will know where the line markings are a lot better than a human, even if they are invisible under the snow. You can't have this argument both ways...
But there has been warming for the last 19 years. If you can't even get that basic fact right, why should anyone listen to you on this subject? You clearly are not arguing from expertise and experience, just hubris and emotion. Yay you.
Because people could figure out how to get an automated vehicle driving around streets, and an automated vehicle flying from the first vehicle to various properties and delivering packages, but they couldn't figure out how to automate the changing of batteries. Really?
1. It's better to have the pollution at the power station than being released all over cities & towns 2. People can charge their cars wherever there is electricity. If enough people drive electric cars, charging stations will appear everywhere, including at your work. 3. When your country gets its act together and gets cleaner electricity, no upgrade to the electric cars is required to reduce pollution.
It might just be that the people you call SJWs are just normal, reasonable people who point out your glaring mistakes in reason and knowledge. A good example is you complaining that some people you made up are going to complain that a continent is not represented in a showcase of countries.
Hint: labelling people you don't like with some throwaway, nebulous term doesn't make you look particularly intellectually honest. It makes you look lazy, and relegates your argument to the same level of the people you appear to despise... Strange, huh? Your desire to despise "them" has turned you into one.
Slashdot Mirror
So you've not read the IPCC reports. That is a rather large condemnation of your position, as you are railing against something that exists only in your mind. Your argument is extremely childish.
The Antarctic sea ice is growing, which can be a sign of melting land ice.
In the time it took you to write that you could have answered all your questions.
You might want to spend your time reading about this as opposed to posting your ignorance on slashdot... If you really cared to know the answers to your questions, you would have answered them yourself.
It was probably created by an adult.
There you go again giving us a glimpse into your bleak, depressed, scared little life. Run along now and play with the other xenophobes - the grown-ups are talking.
Was that supposed to be an argument? It sounds like poorly-informed, reactionary, childish logic to me. After all, if the wives and daughters you mention get attacked, with your wonderful logic their attackers also have guns. Yay for reactionary thinking! Boo logic!
That's the extent of your argument? Really? That's the best you could do?
Knives and cars are not designed solely to kill things. That's the difference. With that newly-found knowledge, go back and re-make your argument.
It's not irresponsible to have a gun on your person you don't know about? Or to take said gun to an airport? Really?
I thought the mantra was that gun owners are responsible. If they forget they have a loaded gun on them, they are clearly not responsible, by the very definition of the word.
Comparing those taxis to modern electric vehicles is ridiculous. Yes, they both are "electric", have wheels, and carry people for money, but that's pretty much where the similarity ends. Your feigned indignation is very transparent.
If it's heavily-mapped, the car will know where the line markings are a lot better than a human, even if they are invisible under the snow. You can't have this argument both ways...
But there has been warming for the last 19 years. If you can't even get that basic fact right, why should anyone listen to you on this subject? You clearly are not arguing from expertise and experience, just hubris and emotion. Yay you.
Not even close.
There you go - terrorists, drug cartel founders, dictators. Take your pick.
It is supported under Windows 10 - I know because my little media PC at home has the E450 APU with the 6320, and it runs Windows 10 just fine.
You should ask your educators for a refund.
You added "immediately" to that. It doesn't make you look particularly mature if you have to butcher the statement you are responding to. Good jerb!
Because people could figure out how to get an automated vehicle driving around streets, and an automated vehicle flying from the first vehicle to various properties and delivering packages, but they couldn't figure out how to automate the changing of batteries. Really?
No, not everyone does that. That you would assume that to be the case is incredibly telling...
1. It's better to have the pollution at the power station than being released all over cities & towns
2. People can charge their cars wherever there is electricity. If enough people drive electric cars, charging stations will appear everywhere, including at your work.
3. When your country gets its act together and gets cleaner electricity, no upgrade to the electric cars is required to reduce pollution.
What does that have to do with Trump? Is that the entirety of your argument? I bet you don't even realise you are making the OP's point...
It might just be that the people you call SJWs are just normal, reasonable people who point out your glaring mistakes in reason and knowledge. A good example is you complaining that some people you made up are going to complain that a continent is not represented in a showcase of countries.
Hint: labelling people you don't like with some throwaway, nebulous term doesn't make you look particularly intellectually honest. It makes you look lazy, and relegates your argument to the same level of the people you appear to despise... Strange, huh? Your desire to despise "them" has turned you into one.
The irony - someone complaining about "dumb" "dickheads" and screwing it up in the process. Good jerrrrrb!