You realise your conduct on slashdot makes your product look like it was developed by someone unhinged, right? Probably not, as you keep doing it. "Buy my software! Fund my delusions! I might even call you a cocksucker!"
Just do what countries with decent internet service do: separate the infrastructure from the provider. If access to the infrastructure is guaranteed to any ISP, you get a shit tonne of ISPs and infrastructure removed from the business pressures of being an ISP/media conglomerate. Like how different courier services don't need their own roads.
Yes - you're moving the pollution to the power station, where it is far more easily dealt with, and not in the middle of towns and cities. Then, when those power stations are replaced by something greener, the electric cars don't have to be changed, and the pollution decreases.
That's demonstrably not true, though. If it was the case, European ISPs and communications would be as crippled as they are in the US, which is not the case.
Your competitors' products can ban your spammy posts, and hosts files can't. You're advertising for your competitors with every single post you make here.
It increases the temperature which increases the amount of water vapour the air can hold, which in turn increases the amount of clouds when the air cools.
He spent the money on rehabilitating himself, and will pay taxes with his job. Or would you rather the government lock him up, not receive those taxes, and instead spend even more money on his custody?
Thanks for showing just how little you value being correct, and just how much you value stereotyping. You really shot yourself in the foot with that comment, but I'm sure you'll limp on as if you meant to do that.
Seeing as your explanation of the issue is incorrect (it's not "things people don't like" which are being banned, but "demonstrably dangerous or illegal things"), it's safe to assume you might have made some other mistakes in your argument.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe you should mention how mentioning virtue signalling or SJWs is virtue signalling...
There's a difference between being physically able to use a service and being allowed to use a service, unfortunately...
You realise your conduct on slashdot makes your product look like it was developed by someone unhinged, right? Probably not, as you keep doing it. "Buy my software! Fund my delusions! I might even call you a cocksucker!"
You might want to check out journalctl, as apparently you're doing it incredibly wrong.
Just do what countries with decent internet service do: separate the infrastructure from the provider. If access to the infrastructure is guaranteed to any ISP, you get a shit tonne of ISPs and infrastructure removed from the business pressures of being an ISP/media conglomerate. Like how different courier services don't need their own roads.
Yes - you're moving the pollution to the power station, where it is far more easily dealt with, and not in the middle of towns and cities. Then, when those power stations are replaced by something greener, the electric cars don't have to be changed, and the pollution decreases.
They were found entirely innocent. Like, entirely. You want to try this again, sparky?
You don't seem to understand what net neutrality is. Ouch.
BitTorrent wasn't designed to kill.
You're cute.
That's demonstrably not true, though. If it was the case, European ISPs and communications would be as crippled as they are in the US, which is not the case.
These Muslims are writing the laws now? Eh?
It doesn't stand for anything.
Your competitors' products can ban your spammy posts, and hosts files can't. You're advertising for your competitors with every single post you make here.
Yes, people have tested it, hence web assembly being made.
It increases the temperature which increases the amount of water vapour the air can hold, which in turn increases the amount of clouds when the air cools.
Except this "insurgency" only exists in the minds of the nationalists, just as the hatred for the minority you mentioned.
Maybe she's immune because the trumped-up accusations against her are just that - trumped up?
He spent the money on rehabilitating himself, and will pay taxes with his job. Or would you rather the government lock him up, not receive those taxes, and instead spend even more money on his custody?
Thanks for showing just how little you value being correct, and just how much you value stereotyping. You really shot yourself in the foot with that comment, but I'm sure you'll limp on as if you meant to do that.
It looks like someone threw up on a time-travelling toaster.
So you are apathetic to the suffering of others; suffering you are indirectly responsible for by your lack of action. Gotcha.
Seeing as your explanation of the issue is incorrect (it's not "things people don't like" which are being banned, but "demonstrably dangerous or illegal things"), it's safe to assume you might have made some other mistakes in your argument.
Here comes Chrisq again to show just how little he understands of the things he decided to hate. Jog on, Oswald.