France, or any nation, cannot be "carbon neutral" without nuclear power
Not having a good day are you. France has a LOT of nuclear power already and unlike the USA, Japan etc they are not just sitting on what they have but are planning to add significant amounts more.
You've just been attempting to distract from your stupid statement where you seemed to forget that the pedal is not actually the clutch - here it is again:
People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it, and not trash the transmission either
The clutch is still obviously operating in those situations, it just is not disengaged during the change.
It worked for the Romans so why not for us. Also why not - just because almost nobody else offering jobs to a major chunk of the population doesn't mean the military should abandon them as well instead of looking for people with potential. The answer IMHO is to have orgs other than the military and sports looking for talent outside of a narrow class range.
There is an incredibly major difference between calling on a service to start as the proper user via a thing running as root and actually running the service as root like the systemD design fault does. I've got no idea why you are defending this newbie mistake of not checking inputs. Even Lennart pointed out that it's not a good thing to happen - I quoted him in another thread where he was annoyed that a user creation "tool" was allowing such a name.
Get your Dad to tell you about it before trying to teach something you have no fucking clue about to people who knew about it before you were born.
Oliver North was a US Government employee and working on the deal. It was legal
Just like embezzling the money was legal? If it was legal why all the efforts to destroy evidence by spending days deleting emails one by one? Go get someone with a clue to tell you about it before trying to shove North's own lying version down our throats. He's not just a thief, he's a liar as well - and he's rebuilt the NRA in his image.
What's with clueless people delivering lectures on topics they know very little about after an obvious fuckup? If you had been studying engineering in the late 1990s I could have been one of your "professors" that you are using as your appeal to authority. The pedal is a different thing to the plate!
Just look it up! Take a look at the model T transmission and brake bands while you are at it since that is simple enough that it will add to your understanding of what you were trying to describe above with your shifted goalposts.
Consider a drive train with ICE -> transmission -> electric motor -> differential -> wheels
Not what you were describing above as you well know when you wrote " People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it". What's with the utterly shameless desire to "win" all the time? It's just like when you were trying to tell people earlier that plutonium is some harmless thing that doesn't need to be treated with respect.
I did answer explicitly, and the answer was, and I quote, Nope. Then I went on explaining that this position was not set in stone and if there is good evidence to do so, this position should be reconsidered.
See, that wasn't so hard, and is vastly superior to your attack on the USA and your attack on me via my posting history.
to order you where they want not the other way around, potentially to a warzone
Well yes - one of the reasons I didn't do it (I'm crap at following orders) and one of the reasons I have utter contempt for a nearby politician who did sign on and weaseled out via political connections when he was ordered to serve overseas (yet he still makes a lot of noise about being in the army). If you are not willing you don't sign up IMHO. If you are willing it's a better deal than many.
Instead of sniping and missing by half the planet how about considering the following question I posed earlier:
So would you suggesting banning all of that because it's "alters the persons intuition of what is ok"?
Saying you don't want to answer is far better than some sort of ridiculous attack.
Why are you afraid of discussing issues that might possibly lead to banning stuff?
WTF? I am discussing it and was asking for your opinion. You are the one that attacked an entire culture instead of discussing.
seems you tent do insult in a condescending tone
There have been a few children here lately who have seen fit to "lecture" me on what they see as history despite it being relatively recent - plus coders posting stupid shit about very simple science that they are out of their depth with. Politeness is worth it for a while but doesn't really work if the misinformation is persistent over multiple threads. You are not spreading misinformation so if I insult you I have zero excuse.
which would be stupid _before_ acquiring the high school finishing papers
I'd argue the opposite. It seems these days that the military are just about the only ones actually training people. If you want to be a mechanic, electrician or a pile of other trades including aviation ones it's the choice that's most likely to actually get you there instead of having to wait for a lucky break. Friends and relatives that took the military path had a far smoother career track than I did.
Thinking about this some I consider that a clutch is not even needed to switch gears if the engine and gearing can be synchronized. People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it
Maybe you should think a little more about what the clutch actually is instead of confusing it with the pedal.
Gas is getting cheaper and cheaper....especially as oil prices drop per barrel
We are in the middle of a price war between the state owned Saudi oil company and the smaller US oil shale producers that the Saudis want to drive out of business. Once that's done they'll raise their prices again.
What a pointless post - instead of actually exhibiting some sort of thought you've gone and attacked a strawman under the assumption that I dwell on the opposite side of the world to where I do. Surely you can do much better than such stupidity?
So would you suggesting banning all of that because it's "alters the persons intuition of what is ok"? Do you see what I'm trying to point out about making thoughts a crime yet?
Experimental research? Using that pair? Very unfortunate phrasing given the subject matter.
I know it's the way the kidz tork now but it kind of ticks me off that "research" is the impressive word of choice now for looking up wikipedia, and the go-to insult in disagreements where one party wants to suggest the other lacks the shallow understand they have. Even reading real research on such a shallow level as is implied is nothing like research. If you are a "creative working on optics" or similar, carry on, but if not, it's kind of annoying and some will think less of you especially on science topics (even social science ones).
We've all just been baited by Sharkey who is trying to stir up some fuss in a search for relevance with his "Foundation for Responsible Robotics". It's a non-issue but he's got us attempting to connect real issues to it that are so many steps removed that it's irrelevant. The appearance of the thing is not the thing. The photograph is not taking the soul away from anybody.
Are you saying that Oliver North sold weapons outside his capacity in the government
The court said it, as did Hezbolla. Israel wasn't very happy either, especially about the classified anti-tank weapons we wouldn't give to them but North sold to Hezbolla. He also embezzled a lot of the cash from those deals. The guy who built North a fence after knowingly getting paid with North's pilfered cash was the only one that went to jail over the deal with terrorists. Nice hero you've got. Pity he was putting an enemy ahead of the USA. There is a word for people like that.
what "dump on the second amendment" are you referring to
Twisting it's meaning into ridiculousness for it's own ends.
So - what do you feel about depictions of crime in media then? Gateway to crime? Violent computer games? Novels? Music? It's a pretty major can of worms once you start going after thoughtcrime.
Personally I'd be more worried about the people confecting outrage on issues like this and what agenda they are trying to push with it than some imaginary person who may someday purchase these products that DO NOT EXIST. It's looking like someone is trying to pull a fast one on us.
Maybe allow them so long as they come with a tube of superglue mislabeled "lube".
How about we get outraged about abuse of real kids instead of objects. Going after thoughtcrime can be a bit of a slippery slope once it gets into victimless territory.
Slashdot Mirror
OK well that's new and a total change in policy that I very much doubt is going to be implemented beyond being described in a plan.
Well spotted.
Not having a good day are you. France has a LOT of nuclear power already and unlike the USA, Japan etc they are not just sitting on what they have but are planning to add significant amounts more.
Where you wrote as if a direct drive was in use instead of a clutch slipping enough to allow people to change gears without disengaging.
You've just been attempting to distract from your stupid statement where you seemed to forget that the pedal is not actually the clutch - here it is again:
The clutch is still obviously operating in those situations, it just is not disengaged during the change.
It worked for the Romans so why not for us.
Also why not - just because almost nobody else offering jobs to a major chunk of the population doesn't mean the military should abandon them as well instead of looking for people with potential. The answer IMHO is to have orgs other than the military and sports looking for talent outside of a narrow class range.
There is an incredibly major difference between calling on a service to start as the proper user via a thing running as root and actually running the service as root like the systemD design fault does.
I've got no idea why you are defending this newbie mistake of not checking inputs. Even Lennart pointed out that it's not a good thing to happen - I quoted him in another thread where he was annoyed that a user creation "tool" was allowing such a name.
Just like embezzling the money was legal? If it was legal why all the efforts to destroy evidence by spending days deleting emails one by one?
Go get someone with a clue to tell you about it before trying to shove North's own lying version down our throats. He's not just a thief, he's a liar as well - and he's rebuilt the NRA in his image.
What's with clueless people delivering lectures on topics they know very little about after an obvious fuckup? If you had been studying engineering in the late 1990s I could have been one of your "professors" that you are using as your appeal to authority.
The pedal is a different thing to the plate!
Just look it up! Take a look at the model T transmission and brake bands while you are at it since that is simple enough that it will add to your understanding of what you were trying to describe above with your shifted goalposts.
Not what you were describing above as you well know when you wrote " People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it".
What's with the utterly shameless desire to "win" all the time? It's just like when you were trying to tell people earlier that plutonium is some harmless thing that doesn't need to be treated with respect.
See, that wasn't so hard, and is vastly superior to your attack on the USA and your attack on me via my posting history.
Well yes - one of the reasons I didn't do it (I'm crap at following orders) and one of the reasons I have utter contempt for a nearby politician who did sign on and weaseled out via political connections when he was ordered to serve overseas (yet he still makes a lot of noise about being in the army). If you are not willing you don't sign up IMHO. If you are willing it's a better deal than many.
Saying you don't want to answer is far better than some sort of ridiculous attack.
WTF? I am discussing it and was asking for your opinion. You are the one that attacked an entire culture instead of discussing.
There have been a few children here lately who have seen fit to "lecture" me on what they see as history despite it being relatively recent - plus coders posting stupid shit about very simple science that they are out of their depth with. Politeness is worth it for a while but doesn't really work if the misinformation is persistent over multiple threads.
You are not spreading misinformation so if I insult you I have zero excuse.
I'd argue the opposite. It seems these days that the military are just about the only ones actually training people. If you want to be a mechanic, electrician or a pile of other trades including aviation ones it's the choice that's most likely to actually get you there instead of having to wait for a lucky break. Friends and relatives that took the military path had a far smoother career track than I did.
Maybe you should think a little more about what the clutch actually is instead of confusing it with the pedal.
Only the oil that is easy enough to get to be worth getting is what matters.
We are in the middle of a price war between the state owned Saudi oil company and the smaller US oil shale producers that the Saudis want to drive out of business. Once that's done they'll raise their prices again.
Not just a trailer, there was a hybrid (Bergepanzer Tiger) that was used to tow tiger tanks!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VK_4501_(P)
What the fuck is wrong with your head? Israel giving weapons to Iran? What fantasy world do you live in?
No wonder North has you fooled.
Go ask someone over 40. That's how easy it is to get the true story.
So? Isn't it better to have DNS or whatever not start than getting 0wned by a script kiddie?
What a pointless post - instead of actually exhibiting some sort of thought you've gone and attacked a strawman under the assumption that I dwell on the opposite side of the world to where I do.
Surely you can do much better than such stupidity?
So would you suggesting banning all of that because it's "alters the persons intuition of what is ok"?
Do you see what I'm trying to point out about making thoughts a crime yet?
Experimental research? Using that pair? Very unfortunate phrasing given the subject matter.
I know it's the way the kidz tork now but it kind of ticks me off that "research" is the impressive word of choice now for looking up wikipedia, and the go-to insult in disagreements where one party wants to suggest the other lacks the shallow understand they have. Even reading real research on such a shallow level as is implied is nothing like research.
If you are a "creative working on optics" or similar, carry on, but if not, it's kind of annoying and some will think less of you especially on science topics (even social science ones).
We've all just been baited by Sharkey who is trying to stir up some fuss in a search for relevance with his "Foundation for Responsible Robotics". It's a non-issue but he's got us attempting to connect real issues to it that are so many steps removed that it's irrelevant. The appearance of the thing is not the thing. The photograph is not taking the soul away from anybody.
The court said it, as did Hezbolla. Israel wasn't very happy either, especially about the classified anti-tank weapons we wouldn't give to them but North sold to Hezbolla. He also embezzled a lot of the cash from those deals. The guy who built North a fence after knowingly getting paid with North's pilfered cash was the only one that went to jail over the deal with terrorists.
Nice hero you've got.
Pity he was putting an enemy ahead of the USA. There is a word for people like that.
Twisting it's meaning into ridiculousness for it's own ends.
So - what do you feel about depictions of crime in media then? Gateway to crime? Violent computer games? Novels? Music?
It's a pretty major can of worms once you start going after thoughtcrime.
Personally I'd be more worried about the people confecting outrage on issues like this and what agenda they are trying to push with it than some imaginary person who may someday purchase these products that DO NOT EXIST. It's looking like someone is trying to pull a fast one on us.
Maybe allow them so long as they come with a tube of superglue mislabeled "lube".
How about we get outraged about abuse of real kids instead of objects. Going after thoughtcrime can be a bit of a slippery slope once it gets into victimless territory.