Slashdot Mirror


Volvo Says It Will Only Make Electric and Hybrid Cars Starting in 2019 (npr.org)

Volvo has announced that starting in 2019, all of the new models it produces will be electric or hybrid. From a report: "This announcement marks the end of the solely combustion engine-powered car," said Hakan Samuelsson, Volvo president and chief executive, in a statement. "Volvo Cars has stated that it plans to have sold a total of 1 million electrified cars by 2025. When we said it we meant it. This is how we are going to do it." The move makes Volvo the first traditional automaker to set a date to phase out cars powered only by internal combustion engines, Reuters reports. The company said it will launch five fully electric cars between 2019 and 2021. Three of these will be Volvos, and two will be sold under the company's Polestar "electrified performance brand."

240 comments

  1. Vulvas like battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So this announcement makes sense

    1. Re:Vulvas like battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panties Stink!
      They really, really stink!
      Sometimes they're red, sometimes they're green,
      Sometimes they're white or black or pink
      Sometimes they're satin, sometimes they're lace
      Sometimes they're cotton and soak up stains
      But at the end of the day, it really makes you think
      Wooooooo-wheeeee! Panties stink!

      Sometimes they're on the bathroom floor
      Your girlfriend- what a whore!
      Sometimes they're warm and wet and raw
      From beneath the skirt of your mother-in-law
      Brownish stains from daily wear
      A gusset full of pubic hair
      Just make sure your nose is ready
      For the tang of a sweat-soaked wedgie
      In your hand a pair of drawers
      With a funky feminine discharge
      Give your nose a rest, fix yourself a drink
      cause wooooooo-wheeeeeee! panties stink!

      Awesome post - thanks!

    2. Re:Vulvas like battery power by Gay+Boner+Sex · · Score: 1

      On this note, I just mentioned to one of my lezzie gfs this article. I don't know if she was joking, but she said she'd have to switch to Subaru. She and her mate (her choice of words) both drive Volvos.

      Unintended consequences?

    3. Re:Vulvas like battery power by shmlco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regarding Subaru: "In an interview published Sunday by Bloomberg, the company's CEO Yasuyuki Yoshinaga said that it plans to make all-electric versions of existing models rather than develop new vehicle lines for the new powertrains."

      Tesla is selling the S and X and soon the M3. Fischer is pushing forward. Chevrolet is selling the Volt and Bolt. Toyota, of course, is selling the Prius Prime PHEV plus several other hybrids. Honda has the Clarity plus hybrids. Nissan Leaf. BMW is selling the i3 and teasing the i8. Kia Soul EV and Niro. Fiat 500e. Hyundai Ioniq.

      Tell your gf that they're coming, like it or not.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    4. Re: Vulvas like battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of those vehicles segments are profitable for any manufacturer. They are losing money making those vehicles. They only make them to meet fleet mpg averages. SUVs and trucks are the profit segments. As long as oil is this cheap they don't stand a chance.

    5. Re: Vulvas like battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "teasing the i8"? I see more i8s here in the U.K. Than I do i3s.

    6. Re: Vulvas like battery power by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      You're lying to yourself, but the real question is, why?

    7. Re: Vulvas like battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "teasing the i8"? I see more i8s here in the U.K. Than I do i3s.

      I saw an i8 in Chicago this time last year, they're rare but they've been available for a while in the USA.

    8. Re:Vulvas like battery power by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Hybrids bring one advantage to the table, especially as congestion gets worse: At idle, the IC engine can be turned off so the vehicle takes zero power, other than to handle the HVAC and electronics. This means less pollution overall.

      Of course, a hybrid with an inverter is useful if one has a house or condo and power goes out. It is a lot quieter and likely more fuel efficient than a generator.

    9. Re: Vulvas like battery power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Must be an American car company paid shill...

      How many times with US car companies dig in and fight adequate safety restraints, emissions compliance, fuel efficiency, computer security, etc... and then loose ever-larger segments of the market while competitors rush and and take their customers away?

      The big push right now is to get investors to short Tesla stock and destroy the company before the public realizes that electric cars are the future... probably will not work now that China-owned Volvo is joining the all-electric faction

    10. Re: Vulvas like battery power by b0bby · · Score: 2

      I'm planning to buy a Leaf this fall, so I'm in favor of electric cars and I do think that they are the future. However, at this point, very few of them are profitable for the manufacturers. The CEO of Fiat told people not to buy the 500e, the Soul EV is very limited in availability. Just last month the Leaf was available with a $10k rebate. It seems like GM loses ~$7k on each Bolt right now. Tesla seems like one of the few which would be making money if they weren't reinvesting.

      One problem with the rapid advances in batteries (which are usually ~50% of the cost) is that older EVs lose their value horrifically. Even after you account for the tax credits, an older Leaf for example (which might have only a 50 mile usable range at this point) is around $5-6k. I expect that when the new Teslas start rolling out that will drop even more. But at some point, probably not to long from now, the battery prices will mean that the cost for a reasonable range will be competitive with ICEs. But if you think that time is right now, I think you're mistaken.

    11. Re:Vulvas like battery power by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On this note, I just mentioned to one of my lezzie gfs this article. I don't know if she was joking, but she said she'd have to switch to Subaru. She and her mate (her choice of words) both drive Volvos.

      Bullshit. You and she and I all know that she's going to switch to a tacoma with a camper shell.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re: Vulvas like battery power by torkus · · Score: 1

      I don't see the Tesla cars losing their value 'horrifically' by any means. In fact the 7+ year old roadsters sell for 60-70% of their original value which is astounding. Unlike some cars which claim to be an 'instant classic' these just about achieved that.

      Nor do you hear any of the doomsday predictions about batteries dying coming true either. The biggest risk seems to be if you let a pack fully discharge, then it's 'bricked' and the car won't charge it anymore.

      Maybe the Leaf is selling for peanuts, but it wasn't in the same class to begin with.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    13. Re: Vulvas like battery power by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Too bad you're not in charge, you could tell all of those companies just what they're doing wrong....

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  2. Meanwhile... by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somewhere in the world right now, Jeremy Clarkson is banging his head against a dashboard.

    --
    Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jeremy Clarkson liked the BMW i8 hybrid. I don't think he has a problem with hybrids so long as they are good hybrids;

      "What we have here, then, is a car that runs silently on electric power when you just have to go to work. But that becomes a Porsche 911 when you are in the mood. This is a sport hybrid, but unlike other sport hybrids — the McLaren P1 and the Porsche 918 Spyder, for example — it does not cost eleven hundred and seventy thirteen million pounds."
      [...]
      Toyota had just about convinced the world that if you wanted a hybrid you could pretty much kiss goodbye to the concept of fun. But with the i8 BMW has shown this ain’t necessarily so.

      I still believe that with hybrids we are going down the wrong road. But with an i8, going in completely the wrong direction is at least wonderfully enjoyable.

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This right here about him...

      He hates crap cars. He can also pull your leg and be dead serious about it. He is currently gushing on and on about the car that nearly killed his co-host. Thought that may be just to save face somehow for the show. He is an opinionated car reviewer. He has a very well created personality of the crumengon that hates those electric car things. That may or may not be totally different than his real self.

      His disdain for the Prius is well deserved. It is a mediocre mass produced car that costs more than it should and looks like plastic junk. All to sell you a feeling of 'im helping'.

    3. Re:Meanwhile... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      That's a "good" hybrid, just like the Mitsubishis and Volvos being sold over here. Good in the sense that they got a decent petrol engine and have a lot of of extra torque thanks to the additional electric motors, so you get very spiffy acceleration and no range issues, while still qualifying for the significant tax break. Environment? The hybrid part is just a power boost.

      I do agree that hybrids are a temporary solution at best. It's a lot of extra complexity and weight for a slight environmental benefit and a bit of extra power.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the same guy just plain LIED in his show about the tesla ... why ? what is his motivation ?

    5. Re:Meanwhile... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      He didn't actually lie - Tesla sued TopGear for libel and defamation, the outcome of the case was that the judge found that top gear had been truthful, and that Tesla defamed TopGear, and were liable for £100,000 damages against TopGear.

    6. Re:Meanwhile... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Let us also not forget the holy trinity... Porsche 918, McLaren P1, and the Ferrari TheFerrari.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is true that Tesla's case was tossed. However, do you have a citation for your claim about Tesla being liable to Top Gear for damages?

    8. Re:Meanwhile... by Rei · · Score: 2

      Or, you could, you know, actually present facts, such as a summary of the lower court rulings and the full appeals ruling. The judge did not find that "Tesla defamed TopGear" and was liable for "£100,000 damages". In Europe, if you lose a court case, you generally bear all of the cost of proceedings. The short of the case: The lower court judge argued (and the appeals judge concurred) that viewers should recognize that the show is an entertainment program and that reasonable buyers should understand that range is relative to how you drive a vehicle; that Tesla couldn't show that the statements were "calculated" to cause damage; and that Tesla failed to put forth a compelling case that they lost sales because of the program.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    9. Re:Meanwhile... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      https://www.theguardian.com/me...

      "The lengthy legal affair is likely to have proved expensive for Tesla, which hired London libel specialists Carter-Ruck and a top QC to fight its case from 2011. In the past year alone, Tesla has been ordered to pay £100,000 in costs on account to the BBC."

    10. Re:Meanwhile... by Trongy · · Score: 1

      Court costs are not damages. Basically, Tesla had to pay the BBC's lawyer fees so the BBC came out even.
      Damages could only have been awarded to the BBC if they had counter-sued Tesla.

    11. Re:Meanwhile... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It depends whether or not the hybrid part is a drive motor or just an electric generator, set to run at a specific revolution range and torque load to run as efficiently as possible, with all drive still produced by the electric motor and the generator just charging the batteries to get them back to say fifty percent (cheaper to complete charge at home or charging station, rather than paying for fuel, likely diesel ie battery drops to 25% load and generator cuts in to get it back to 50%). The hybrid also allows more energy efficient heating of the passenger compartment ie heat as by product of electricity to charge battery, rather than draining the battery for heat (so generator cuts in say at 80% battery load to conserve battery when heat is required). Infernal combustion engines can be designed to be very efficient and very compact at set revolution and load conditions.

      The big advantage Volvo gain is not having to support and infernal combustion range, with required additional parts, at the same time, hugely reducing costs. The mind boggles at how bad resale will be on high end fossil fuellers when the switch over kicks in. Efficiencies in fuel distribution will also collapse, likely killing the majority of petrol stations and forcing up fuel prices make electric even cheaper in comparison especially with the growth in scale of operation.

      There has been a lot of battery development lately and there still seems to be plenty of room for improvement. Hybrids likely for commercial operations only.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Meanwhile... by 4im · · Score: 1

      Toyota had just about convinced the world that if you wanted a hybrid you could pretty much kiss goodbye to the concept of fun.

      Well, early 2009 I was in the market for a station wagon, after the birth of my first child and finding out that a small car or a coupé aren't exactly optimal in that context. I did try the Toyota Avensis with the biggest diesel engine, no hybrid. No fun. Whatsoever. It was like sleeping at the wheel, the thing wouldn't move even when pushed. I didn't expect anything sporty, just... for it to move when it should. The next car tested was a VW Passat. The test vehicle also had a diesel engine, less power than the Toyota (and yes, most probably one of the emission cheaters). Wow, that thing just drove. Fun driving. On a straight line, it wasn't that far even from my E46 BMW 330Ci. Needless to say, I ended up buying a Passat... gas engine though.

      Based on hat, I'm sorely tempted to say that Toyota makes boring cars (not just hybrids), with the possible exception of the GT.

      As for the BMW i8 - well, fun to drive is their motto. It would be an extreme disappointment if one of their (expensive) flagships were boring. Even then, I wouldn't be surprised if their mass-market (and ugly as hell) i3 were much less interesting.

  3. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title is directly contradicted by the first line of the summary. Great job!

    1. Re: wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it didn't contradict. It said only electric and hybrid models will be made. Then it said all new models will be electric or hybrid. No contradiction.

      ICE-only vehicles will no longer be made.

  4. Correct headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Failed automaker puts final nail in their coffin.

    1. Re:Correct headline by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      When you buy Volvo you really need to do your homework. Some production years are crap while the next year sees great cars roll off the line. My C70 with the regular 2.4 5 cylinder engine is a great car. Best part is: I bought it second hand 6 years ago, and it's still worth about the same today, due to it being of the "right" year. With the more popular models like the estates, which people buy as work horses, I've seen almost a factor 2 difference between models only 1 year apart. Because one will be crap, and the other great.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Correct headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yea all that was before the Chinese bought them so every year is crap year from here on out

    3. Re:Correct headline by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people who aren't anonymous idiots on /. have tried the Geely Volvos, and discovered they're quite good. I have a Geely Volvo (2015 XC70 T6, purchased in mid-2014) and it's been great so far. Pretty much ideal for my purposes, comfortable for the 1300-mile drives I do a few times a year, and has hardly required any maintenance. It was relatively cheap, too (under $40K).

      We'll see how it's doing when it's more than a decade old and into the six digits - our old V70 went 18 years and around 200K miles before we got rid of it - but so far I'm cautiously optimistic.

  5. Ha! by Badlight · · Score: 0

    I wasn't going to buy one of those pieces of crap, anyway, and now they won't even make the type of car that I would consider buying.

    1. Re:Ha! by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1, Informative

      > I wasn't going to buy one of those pieces of crap, anyway

      You took time out of your day to tell us what you don't do so you could complain about it.

      Wow.

    2. Re:Ha! by shmlco · · Score: 4, Funny

      "... and now they won't even make the type of car that I would consider buying."

      Sounds like the bus and a lot of walking is in your future.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    3. Re:Ha! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      What is the problem about having a hybrid car?
      Do you just like the idea of polluting the environment more and paying more for Gasoline every month?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One that runs on clean American coal?

      A man can dream, can't he?

    5. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want an ICE then fuck you

      Fixed that for you.

    6. Re: Ha! by shmlco · · Score: 4, Informative

      You realize that there are Prius autos out there that are hitting 500,000 miles on their original batteries, yes? Or that electrics have about 2,000 fewer parts to wear out and break as opposed to ICEs?

      And I just saw an article recently that ran down the top 20 most common repairs needed by modern ICE-powered cars... and none of them apply to EVs.

      If you're wanting reliability, a simple electric motor beats an ICE hands down, and twice on Sunday.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    7. Re:Ha! by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wasn't going to buy one of those pieces of crap, anyway, and now they won't even make the type of car that I would consider buying.

      That's exactly why this is the right move for the kind of customer that Volvo is pursuing. Whether pursuing that kind of customer is a good idea or not is another issue. As far as I can tell, it's the middle class, and the middle class is shrinking. At least they finally figured out that they have to make their cars tall if they want to sell them.

      Volvo is already selling a highly fancy-pants twincharged (super+turbo) engine with all the bells and whistles. They're fairly well-committed to taking the high-tech solution. But what do you have against hybrids? The Germans and the Koreans alike are now using it to make cars better first, and more efficient second. They still achieve significant efficiency gains, while also improving performance — sometimes by quite a lot, because the electric motor ideally complements the gasoline engine. The electric motor makes peak torque near stall, while the gasoline engine makes it much higher, especially if it is not turbocharged.

      But let's say you have a tiny little engine, a big but cheap turbo, and a 48 volt lithium ion mild hybrid system. Your electric motor fills in down low to make up for the lack of torque in the engine, and for the long spool-up time on the turbocharger. The turbo comes on in the mid-range and continues to let the itty bitty engine make more power well into the high rpm/load range, as the electric motor fades away. How can that be a bad thing? The only reason you might [reasonably] complain is if it's mated to a CVT, but you can as easily use a DCT and get almost the same efficiency. Because you're doing torque fill with the electric motor, the clutches in the DCT will last essentially forever.

      Automakers have to achieve mileage improvements both in specific segments, and also across their range. For the big guys who make vehicles in multiple segments, there's low-hanging fruit that they're already picking in weight reduction, Ford with Aluminum and GM with ultra high-strength steel. Dodge doesn't sell anywhere near as many pickups, and I'm not sure if FCA even has a plan there. For someone like Volvo, who only sells cars and unrelated heavy trucks into the USA, they have to literally get those mileage improvements across their range — that is, in all of their vehicles.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re: Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can I load up the kids and go camping and pull my trailer?

    9. Re: Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      Why the fuck not? Does it have some DRM dongle that makes it impossible to tow unless it's by the right manufacturer of petrol engined cars?

      Indeed electric cars are probably better for towing since there's more consistent torque, usually more torque, and the only cap is the energy output which limits top speed not towing grunt.

    10. Re: Ha! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Ha! by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Damn that electric card! ;)

      Meanwhile, in the real world, multiple studies have reached the same conclusion: on the US's current grid, a complete switchover to EVs:

        * PM increases.
        * You would see more SOx, except that grid operators are largely capped; in order to sell more power, they have to improve their sulfur scrubbing (and it's well worth them in order to sell more power). In short there's little change.
        * NOx is relatively unchanged.
        * VOCs go way down
        * CO goes way down
        * CO2 gets about a 30% reduction

      Also:

        * All regions of the US grid have enough generation capacity for a complete EV switchover with no new construciton needed except for the hydro-rich Pacific Northwest.
        * Local grids however need to be upgraded in many places.
        * That said, nobody is talking about a magic fairy coming along and converting all cars to EVs overnight; even the most rushed production pace would be far slower than the pace of grid maintenance and upgrades.

      Lastly:

        * Gasoline is getting dirtier, as producers increasingly switch to deeper reservoirs, bitumen, tight oil, deepwater crude, etc, which involve more emissions in their production.
        * Electricity is getting cleaner, and surprisingly fast, with most new power being gas, wind, and increasingly, solar.
        * EVs continue to get cleaner over time as the grid does.

      On to your other claims:

      And the batteries are made of rare materials

      No, they don't. The two rarest elements involved in lithium ion batteries are lithium and cobalt, which rank only after nitrogen in Earth's crustal abundance. Their raw material prices of 1-2 dozen dollars per kilogram give a good clue that they're not exactly hard to come by. Li-ion batteries don't even use all that much lithium anyway. By contrast, while gasoline cars don't use a tremendous amount of it, they require platinum or other metals in their catalytic converters and some times spark plugs, which most definitely are rare.

      that require strip-mining to retrieve

      Most cobalt is not directly mined. It's a byproduct of mining the copper used for things like powering the computer you're typing on. Lithium is rarely "strip mined"; it's one of the most environmentally-friendly means of production you can get. It involves pumping brine from under the surface of a playa and drying it in the sun on the surface. Most such playas flood annually, wiping out the evidence that the mine ever was there.

      (Note that while all li-ion batteries use lithium, not all use cobalt. Some for example, use iron phosphate, spinels, etc.)

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    12. Re:Ha! by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, I forgot to mention: grid emissions are largely emitted in less densely populated areas, at altitude. Vehicle emissions are largely emitted at street level, predominantly in more densely populated areas. This amplifies the health effects significantly, particularly for short-lived pollutants.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    13. Re:Ha! by Ferretman · · Score: 1

      That seems a bit of an overreaction.

      Ferret

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    14. Re: Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you list which electric car/truck has the ability to fit 4 kids and hall a 4,000lb trailer?

    15. Re:Ha! by hyades1 · · Score: 2

      I hope you realize your parents aren't going to drive you around forever.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    16. Re: Ha! by Stealthey · · Score: 2

      My car is 11 years old and there are no design constraints in it preventing me from hoping it will last five more years without major expenses. You can't say that about a hybrid or an electric. It WILL need an expensive new battery long before it is 16 years old.

      Hmm,
      How many times did you have to do an Oil/Filter/Spark Plug etc. Change. How much GAS cost for 100KMs vs. Cost of Electricity to charge it for 100KM. So on and so forth.

      I don't foresee the batteries as a long term issue. What will eventually happen, once there are enough EVs on the road, you will see batteries becomming a standard and battery stations will start cropping up.
      Essentially Gas stations will start carrying these standard batteries, you will pay monthly/yearly fee for the service. Once you are running low, you pull into these battery stations and someone or robotically, your battery will be replaced with a fully charged one. You will be in/out in less than 5 minutes. Then you will never have to worry about old battery, cause the cost of maintaining the battery will be handled by the battery charging station. Obviously they will work out a metric for the cost of the doing that, add 1000% profit and then pass over the bill to you. Even at that price, you will be happy cause it is still cheaper than GAS. Even more competition will drive the cost down.

      Needless to say, Electricity manufacturers will be the new overlords.

      --
      I am at loss with words...
    17. Re: Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is only one pure EV on the market legally allowed to tow a trailer: Tesla Model X. Most other cars are not allowed to because they overheat the battery (they would handle lower speeds/durations just fine but need to handle hours in highway speeds).

      Some Hybrids (the ones with an ICE powering the drive train) may tow though.

    18. Re: Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you list which electric car/truck has the ability to fit 4 kids and hall a 4,000lb trailer?

      You didn't list the ages / car seat needs, but a quick google search shows the Tesla Model X has 5, 6, and 7 seat configurations and has a 5,000lb tow rating.

    19. Re: Ha! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Nissan Leaf batteries have been proven over 200k miles, and that's the old chemistry. Some Tesla cars have double that, again with no issues.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re: Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ib-02b2ooLY&t=270s does that answer your question ?

    21. Re: Ha! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      How much GAS cost for 100KMs

      Gas is getting cheaper and cheaper....especially as oil prices drop per barrel.

      Hell, gas is less than $1.99/gallon in most of the US today...its cheap to drive a IC car these days.

      Why are you and others harping on gasoline costs, when they have been dropping for years now?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could also note that

      1. Internal Combustion Engines in cars get about 20% thermal efficiency, while the efficiency of thermal steam turbines are gt 60%
      2. Coal plants are getting phased out for gas and solar, so their argument is diminishing even as we quibble

      All of this BS being thrown by the incumbent US car makers is solely to support their sunk costs in manufacturing equipment for ICE's, and has nothing to do with the value of what people are purchasing

    23. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gasoline is getting dirtier, as producers increasingly switch to deeper reservoirs, bitumen, tight oil, deepwater crude, etc, which involve more emissions in their production."

      You're right for bitumen, but there is zero correlation between how "dirty" an oil is and it either being in a tight reservoir or from deepwater except in a broader sense of energy cost. The oil from the latter two is the same as ever, and the quality of the oil from some deposits is exceptionally good in terms of sulphur content and other parameters. Alternatively you're right if you merely mean it takes more energy and capital costs to extract the oil. That's one of the main reasons why the costs go up those three sources compared to conventional oil, but that's already reflected in the price paid at the pump anyway.

      >> And the batteries are made of rare materials

      >No, they don't. The two rarest elements involved in lithium ion batteries are lithium and cobalt, which rank only after nitrogen in Earth's crustal abundance.

      Abundance in the crust does not necessarily reflect extractability of deposits. The form in which the mineral occurs matters greatly. If it were merely about elemental abundance then pure billets of silicon wouldn't be so expensive. Lithium is largely extracted from igneous sources (mostly pegmatites), or from brines in saline lakes. The latter source has come to dominate because it is generally cheaper, but is still quite energy intensive and both of them involve mining or evaporation pond operations that disturb the surface terrain over large areas. The fact the natural playa floods, typically annually, doesn't make the surface disturbance go away. Once you disturb the playa surface it's obvious for a very long time. Then again, same for any other major extraction process. You can spend energy to restore things back to something similar to the way they were, but you'll always be able to tell. Having things perfectly restored is an unrealistic expectation.

      The really nice thing about lithium is the way it can be recycled, so as challenging as it is to meet demand in a responsible way, at least the resource will get recovered and used again and again.

      Your point about platinum (or other platinum group metals) amounts to the same issue: while very rare and expensive metals, they get enthusiastically recycled for the same reasons. There's also only a tiny amount in a typical catalytic converter. A few grams (3-7g according to this).

      With regards to material, no personal vehicle is going to have zero footprint on the environment when it comes to either the energy supplied or the material going into the vehicle itself. It's pretty hard to make the case that EV leave a bigger impact over the long term as that other AC claims. There's more up-front cost because of the batteries, but you make it back on efficiency and much lower maintenance compared to an internal combustion engine. You can switch the grid to whatever alternative energy source you want if coal-derived electricity is a problem (e.g,. even natural gas is better than coal in terms of impact). The real obstacles are needing to increase total electric generation capacity as you slowly replace oil, and of the course range and time to charge for EVs, which are still mediocre.

    24. Re: Ha! by losfromla · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you're right. And everyone knows there is infinite, endless petroleum underground. Price of oil doesn't wildly fluctuate with political, economic, and butterfly flapping effects so whatever the price is now is what it will continue to be until the rapture, right?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    25. Re:Ha! by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Great info, wish I had mod points to give.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    26. Re:Ha! by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Look pal, no one is going to come and take away your 1971 Maverick Grabber. You can drive that baby into the ground, or wrap it around a tree, whatever, no one cares. Eventually, it will go off the driveable list one way or another. Or gasoline will become so rare that it will be affordable only for wealthy douches or by special permit only. Parts will become harder and harder to get, if you can afford it you'll have to buy a few extra whole cars to keep as donors, etc.
      So enjoy your thoughtless pursuits while you can, you are a dying breed. Lucky for the rest of us YOLO!

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    27. Re: Ha! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      You realize that there are Prius autos out there that are hitting 500,000 miles on their original batteries, yes? Or that electrics have about 2,000 fewer parts to wear out and break as opposed to ICEs?

      And I just saw an article recently that ran down the top 20 most common repairs needed by modern ICE-powered cars... and none of them apply to EVs.

      If you're wanting reliability, a simple electric motor beats an ICE hands down, and twice on Sunday.

      Agreed on the batteries. People still act as if Hybrid technology is so new as to not be proven yet. The Prius has been available in North America and Europe since 2000. Seventeen years. If there was a massive problem with premature battery failure we'd have heard about it by now. It's no more statistically significant than major powertrain issues on an ICE vehicle.

      On repairs, in my experience, a lot of repairs done to ICE cars could easily be applicable to Hybrid or Electric cars. Tires still wear out, tierod ends, shocks still fail, body panels will still corrode in the saltbelt. I will agree on scheduled maintenance (oil change, brakes, etc), but a lot of the same parts could breakdown. Major powertrain problems aren't that common in ICE vehicles.

    28. Re: Ha! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      What will eventually happen, once there are enough EVs on the road, you will see batteries becomming a standard and battery stations will start cropping up.
      Essentially Gas stations will start carrying these standard batteries, you will pay monthly/yearly fee for the service. Once you are running low, you pull into these battery stations and someone or robotically, your battery will be replaced with a fully charged one.

      The problem is battery packs in electric cars are normally designed to maximize dimensions of the car model since they struggle to get the range they get. Someone (Tesla? Nissan?) tried swappable battery packs, but I think they withdrew from the market.

      What may be doable is an addon. For normal driving the built-in batteries are sufficient. For extended range rent either a standard format swappable battery pack, or an ICE Genset that mounts on the roof, trunk, or in a trailer.

    29. Re:Ha! by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're right for bitumen, but there is zero correlation between how "dirty" an oil is and it either being in a tight reservoir or from deepwater except in a broader sense of energy cost.

      Energy cost is precisely the issue. Energy in oil production almost always corresponds directly to CO2 emissions.

      Abundance in the crust does not necessarily reflect extractability of deposits

      No, but as I mentioned, price does. And neither lithium carbonate nor cobalt oxide (aka the raw materials) are particularly expensive. Furthermore, the person said "rare", which does mean abundance.

      The latter source has come to dominate because it is generally cheaper, but is still quite energy intensive and both of them involve mining or evaporation pond operations that disturb the surface terrain over large areas. he fact the natural playa floods, typically annually, doesn't make the surface disturbance go away.

      Dominate overwhelmingly at present (although pegmatites might make a comeback due to booming demand). No, it's not particularly energy intensive, and I'm going to dispute the statement that the evaporation ponds stick around through flood (unless you have something to back that up); production cost reports regularly note that the annual loss of the evaporation ponds makes flooding salars more expensive to produce from (but they represent some of the largest and richest resources). They're made of salt. You don't flood something made of salt, with water, and then have it stick around.

      The GP was trying to make the produditon of lithium sound like some scar-gouging strip mine. Here's what it actually looks like. It's hard to think of a means of mining that has less impact on the landscape.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    30. Re:Ha! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The real obstacles are needing to increase total electric generation capacity as you slowly replace oil. . .

      Electrical utilities have an issue of trying to balance out peak demand vs supply. Demand usually goes up and down during the day, with peaks early in the morning and at dinner time, and lows overnight. On the supply side large nuke plants can't spool up and down quickly, and the wind may blow windmills at random. Currently utilities use concepts such as interruptable industrial customers that can be shutdown if the utility needs the capacity. There is also customers charged time of day billing. With a large install base of electric cars, imagine the utility being able to control charge rates to ensure an even supply-demand balance. If you want a rapid charge, you can pay a premium. If you don't care when between now and 8:00AM tomorrow your car gets charged, you get a discount.

    31. Re: Ha! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Of course, and it will outperform any petrol car on the market while doing so.

      I don't know how far down the road you'll get, but you'll get there fast.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    32. Re:Ha! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Your electric motor fills in down low to make up for the lack of torque in the engine, and for the long spool-up time on the turbocharger.

      Would not an electric driven supercharger fix the problem of spool up time for an exhaust driven turbocharger?

      If you have an electric motor assisting the ICE after the transmission then does one need a dual clutch transmission for smooth shifting and constant torque to the wheels?

      Thinking about this some I consider that a clutch is not even needed to switch gears if the engine and gearing can be synchronized. People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it, and not trash the transmission either. Get a computer control to match the electric motor, gear shifting, and engine throttle and I'd think you'd get a rocket on wheels and do it with pretty cheap hardware. An electric motor and a small (-ish) battery would give you great acceleration in stop and go traffic and then once the car is cruising the computer can switch the motor to generator mode and top off the battery. Put something like this in a heavy truck and a slug of a big rig will get a bit peppier and not annoy so many drivers stuck behind in traffic.

      I like where you are going with this. I'm just thinking that there might be ways to improve on the idea.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    33. Re:Ha! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Use nuclear power and all this pollution goes away.

      To the haters that think nuclear waste is an impossible problem to solve I counter with fourth generation reactors that don't produce waste like the old ones did. Far preferable to the waste produced with coal, solar, or wind.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    34. Re: Ha! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I remember having a conversation about drilling in ANWR and the argument against it was that any wells started there today would not produce for 5 years, so it would do nothing for today's prices. Sure enough prices did drop, and about 5 years after that conversation prices spiked. Supply and demand bit us in the ass. If we had more supply then prices would not have spiked like that.

      Sure would have been nice if we started drilling 10 years ago when I had that conversation.

      The amount of oil in the ground may not be infinite but there is a lot of it. Estimates I've heard on how long we can keep pumping oil out of the ground has varied between 4 decades and 4 centuries. If we can split that down the middle and say we can go as we are now for 200 years then the oil in the ground may as well be infinite as far as anyone alive today is concerned.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    35. Re: Ha! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      can I load up the kids and go camping and pull my trailer?

      Not just a trailer, there was a hybrid (Bergepanzer Tiger) that was used to tow tiger tanks!
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VK_4501_(P)

    36. Re: Ha! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Gas is getting cheaper and cheaper....especially as oil prices drop per barrel

      We are in the middle of a price war between the state owned Saudi oil company and the smaller US oil shale producers that the Saudis want to drive out of business. Once that's done they'll raise their prices again.

    37. Re: Ha! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Only the oil that is easy enough to get to be worth getting is what matters.

    38. Re:Ha! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Thinking about this some I consider that a clutch is not even needed to switch gears if the engine and gearing can be synchronized. People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it

      Maybe you should think a little more about what the clutch actually is instead of confusing it with the pedal.

    39. Re:Ha! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Would not an electric driven supercharger fix the problem of spool up time for an exhaust driven turbocharger?

      It would, and there is nothing particularly wrong with them except that they are vastly more expensive than a turbocharger since they couple half of a turbocharger with an electric motor and a control system, and yet they are less efficient because they are driven by the electrical system instead of exhaust gas pressure whose energy would otherwise be wasted. Meanwhile, they wouldn't give you regen. If you want the mild hybrid system in there anyway to get regen and start-stop, then you might as well use it for torque fill.

      One does not need the DCT for anything other than driving impressions. It has the fastest shifts. In full hybrid vehicles, one can use an automatic transmission and replace the torque converter with an electric motor, which is the approach Subaru has used thus far. But that requires a fairly sizable motor, and then you're going to want more battery. I'm focusing on mild hybrids here, because they are the low-hanging fruit. You basically get mild hybridization for free if you do 48V and stop-start, both of which are generally considered to be coming soon (tm) to basically all vehicles. The only additional component you need is the speed controller for the starter/generator. That's not literally free, nor does it have zero mass, but it's not very expensive and it doesn't weigh much.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:Ha! by blindseer · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you could explain where I am mistaken?

      I'll elaborate further. Consider a drive train with ICE -> transmission -> electric motor -> differential -> wheels. The transmission is capable of park, neutral, and at least two forward gear ratios.

      Process to move car from standstill:
      With ICE running and transmission in neutral the driver pushes accelerator and electric motor propels the vehicle. When transmission input to output ratio matches first gear shift engage first gear.

      Up shift:
      As car accelerates disengage gearing, throttle down ICE until input to output ratio matches next highest gear, increase motor power, engage higher gear, throttle up ICE to continue accelerating with ICE and motor sharing load.

      Down shift:
      As vehicle slows increase motor power and disengage gear, throttle up engine until input and output transmission ratios match next lower gear, engage lower gear, throttle up ICE to allow electric motor to reduce power.

      Slow speed or come to stop:
      Increase motor power to allow transmission to disengage, reduce motor power, when/if driver engages brakes then cut motor power.

      Reverse:
      Disengage transmission, use electric motor alone to propel vehicle. Once at a stop the process to park the vehicle is the transmission engages park (by engaging multiple ratio gearing to lock up transmission). Going forward from stop is as above.

      The drive train is simplified, lighter, at the cost of more advanced transmission control computer connected to the ICE throttle. The accelerator would simply be a "volume control" where the user can indicate to the drive train computer the desired speed.

      So, not much different than many other hybrids. Also, not much different than what one of my professors mention as his proposal for a hybrid vehicle.

      How does this not work?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    41. Re:Ha! by Rei · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Utilities have been salivating over the prospect of electric cars for quite some time; they've been early adopters, even when the tech wasn't up to snuff, and provided significant support for some of the early cross-country EV road trips. They don't just mean more sales, they mean more sales predominantly at times when demand is low, meaning they can use their existing infrastructure to make them more money. The fact that it's at worst a steady draw, and at best a draw which they can adjust within user-set bounds, makes it a dream come true. Fast charging is undesirable to them, but if 5% of charging is fast charging from people on road trips and the other 95% is predominantly overnight home charging, that's a tradeoff they'll gladly take.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    42. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish electric utilities were as greedily enlightened as you say. I've talked to several, trying to convince them to support putting more Level 3 (50kw or more) chargers in the field as a way to show their customers that EVs are viable. In most cases the idea of doing something proactive seems to be completely beyond their comprehension. For the past 100 years, their process is that they don't build anything until someone asks & pays for it, AND the local utilities commission tells them they have to do it. Arguably, it's not their fault: Their mission and legal edict is to provide reliable, predictable power. Innovation is not part of the requirements.

      Eventually, they'll get it. But I've been astounded at how little interest they have in doing something outside of their routine even when means they could make a lot more money.

    43. Re: Ha! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      The oil worth getting is what I was referring to. That oil will last centuries. While seeking alternatives is always a good idea there should be no concern of running out of easy to get oil in anyone's lifetime.

      We'll switch to something else when/if oil gets too expensive. That will happen when oil prices go up enough, alternatives get cheap enough, or they meet somewhere in the middle.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    44. Re:Ha! by Ferretman · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely accurate.....this is perhaps a better analysis of the various metals used in the batteries:

      https://electrek.co/2016/11/01...

      Ferret

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    45. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two rarest elements involved in lithium ion batteries are lithium and cobalt, which rank only after nitrogen in Earth's crustal abundance.

      Not even close: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth%27s_crust

  6. Lots of Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they are planning to produce mostly Hybrids, with a few all electric niche models. Hybrids are a good step.

    1. Re: Lots of Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hybrids work for most people who live in houses and have charging options. But, even without that, they'll still run just fine on gasoline. The advantage with the electric hybrid is being able to charge through the night when there is excess electricity (and cheaper if Time of Use billing is available). Those with 20-30 mile commutes (or 40-50 if they have charging at work) use zero fuel unless they go on an extended trip, and then they just act like a regular gasoline car for fueling (with the possibility of destination charging).

      I am not a "buy green to save the earth" type. I am a conservative in both financial and non-financial politics. The hybrids just make sense to me, and I am currently shopping for a just-off-lease 2014 model. With California adding yet another gas tax ($0.12/gallon more), it seems like the right time to move. I am hoping to be like one reviewer, who after 1 year of ownership has purchased 27 gallons of gas and only changed the oil once on the rarely used combustion engine (per the maintenance schedule). For those of us that drive paying attention, the brakes last way longer as well as most of the stopping can be done with the electric motor in regenerative mode.

      I was looking at all-electric after the news of the Tesla 3. Battery anxiety and the need to get away to the mountains keeps me from the lighter cars without a gasoline engine and gas tank.

    2. Re: Lots of Hybrids by Rei · · Score: 1

      It seems you're confusing "hybrids" and "plug-in hybrids". Hybrids do not plug in at all.

      Out of curiosity, what sort of "getting away to the mountains" route are you concerned about?

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    3. Re: Lots of Hybrids by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I'm not the OP, but I regularly (3 or more times a year) "get away to the mountains" by driving 250 miles with 4-6 people plus skis, an elevation change of ~5k feet, and often 6 inches of fresh snow on the road when I'm nearing the resort. Maybe a Model X would let me do that, but I think I'll keep an ICE for that type of stuff for a while. But 95% of my driving is not that, and we have 3 drivers in the house, so I'll be getting an electric car soon.

    4. Re: Lots of Hybrids by Rei · · Score: 1

      I was asking the OP, not a general "can anyone present an example (without any route specifics that could be crossreferenced with charger locations) which might be difficult for some of the shorter-range Teslas".

      The only detail you actually gave of utility concerning your route is the altitude change. A net gain in 5000 feet corresponds to roughly 50km (31mi) of range loss for a Model S. If you're talking a heavier vehicle, it'd be more. I have no clue what percentage of your "250 miles" is covered in snow (all 250 miles???), so I can't comment on how that changes the total trip's range; I can't comment on how the slopes you take will affect your efficiency because I don't know your route; I can't comment on charging opportunities because I don't know your route; etc.

      When one asks about a route, they're looking for... well, a route.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    5. Re: Lots of Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only detail you actually gave of utility concerning your route is the altitude change

      Did you even read what the guy wrote? Here are the other details you seemed to miss.
      - Its cold enough for snow. Unless you want to drive in a cold car, you're going to have the heat on as well and that is going to suck your battery down and reduce your range further.

      - He's got 4 to 6 people in it with ski equipment
      Sounds like the car is going to be pretty full of people and gear, reducing the useful range even further.

      So, we've got the guy going up a mountain, in the cold and his car fully loaded. Pretty much a worse case scenario for an EV.

    6. Re: Lots of Hybrids by Rei · · Score: 1

      Did you even read what the guy wrote?

      What on Earth do you think I was replying to? How do you expect me to estimate the ability of a vehicle to reach a destination without any clue what route they're talking about and what's along that route? Simply knowing the temperature (which, by the way, they didn't give - and I'm not a moron who doesn't know that "snow means cold") and "how many passengers" are in some undisclosed vehicle, is not nearly enough. The number of passengers is far less important than the type of vehicle (you're talking a small fractional change to rolling resistance, which in turn is not dominant at highway speeds). Temperature furthermore depends on the route profile, as it has an altitude correlation.

      This is all meaningless without knowing the route. The thing that I specifically asked for (and have now done so three times). I can't even begin to determine how well an EV would do for their trip without that. Everything else can be rolled up into error bars.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    7. Re: Lots of Hybrids by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Couple of points:
      - I'm not in the market for a Model X or any other car which costs more than ~$40k, so this is just an academic exercise
      - The GP stated an interest in lighter cars a la Model 3
      - I am interested in an electric car, but I will not be looking for one which can meet all my needs for a good few years
      - My example was just one of many, any of which could potentially be a dealbreaker for someone. But if you'd like to see what would possibly work for the case I'm thinking of, here's the route I use to go skiing:

      Start in DC, 20016, end at Snowshoe WV. Leaving on a Friday at 3pm to try to beat some of the traffic. In January the temperatures are worst case -10 degrees F or so by the time you get up there. Usually no snow to worry about until the last 1/3 of the drive, the bigger roads are plowed. But the last 15 miles (the steepest) are often really hairy, with 4 wheel drive SUVs who don't think snow tires are needed getting stuck. I can usually do that in 5 1/2 hours of actual driving, but I'll stop for an hour or so for dinner (usually in Harrisonburg VA) so that could be time spent charging.

      I walk or bike to work, so I don't really drive a lot. Like I said, maybe a Model X could do it, but I don't want a $100k car. For these types of situations you can't just rent, since you won't get a roof rack or snow tires. In 10 years I expect it will be fairly easy to find something fully electric which can do this for a reasonable cost.

  7. just another Saab Story by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    sorry

  8. Polestar? Really? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > Polestar "electrified performance brand."

    Uhhh, should we tell them that's not a great brand name in north america?

    1. Re:Polestar? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Poledancer?

    2. Re:Polestar? Really? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Their name is already Volvo.

    3. Re:Polestar? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't Polestar be a great brand name in North America? It's been Volvo's race/tuning company for years.

    4. Re:Polestar? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, why not? You can even say like "I'm riding a pole star right now!"

    5. Re:Polestar? Really? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      It's either a direct allusion to a pole dancer, or indirect one to porn star. I guess in european motorsports pole is associated with finishing first, but a lot of things don't translate well across the pond.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    6. Re:Polestar? Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't Polestar be a great brand name in North America? It's been Volvo's race/tuning company for years.

      You got it in one!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Polestar? Really? by Knightman · · Score: 1

      It translates just fine if you have an adequate education.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    8. Re:Polestar? Really? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      To reiterate on the original poster's point, this is a poor choice of name for use in north america. Most Americans might recognize the name North Star but would find it difficult to draw the connection between that and what Pole Star means in that context.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  9. As a strategy, it may not be bad... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    Volvo now has every incentive to make quicker progress on hybrid engines and electric motors than their otherwise ICE-involved competitors might. Of course, it may just be their board's latest brain fart as interpreted by their CEO, too. Time will tell. All I know is that it's a gutsy move.

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:As a strategy, it may not be bad... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also a gutsy move not to. Emissions and mileage regulations are tightening. There's a crackdown against emissions cheaters. Consumers meanwhile expect better and better performance. Electric motors are really the only practical way to deliver high performance in the current regulatory regime - whether you're talking pure electric or hybrid. Electric motors actually become more efficient as they become more powerful, not less (upping the peak power requires lower resistance wiring, which wastes less energy when the vehicle is cruising)

      There's also a serious danger for any automaker being behind the curve on electrification. Tesla's Model 3 production lines are finally going online for what will initially be several hundred thousand vehicles per year, with long-term plans aimed many times larger. Tesla could of course be completely wrong and the market could disappoint in the long-run. But for other manufacturers, the cost of letting your ability to mass-produce reliable electric vehicles stagnate would be a death knell if Tesla is right. Volvo can always go back to making pure gasoline cars if they're wrong, but they can't just suddenly jump to making hundreds of thousands or millions of EVs per year if they haven't built up to that point.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    2. Re:As a strategy, it may not be bad... by phayes · · Score: 1

      The announcement is meaningless as far as all battery cars are concerned. Before making announcements on building a significant number of all electric cars, Volvo needs to figure out where they will be buying these batteries as supply is just too short to just wave their hands and hope to buy them on a barely existent open market.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    3. Re:As a strategy, it may not be bad... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Right, because I'm totally sure that thought never occurred to them. Because they've totally stayed in business all this time by simply guessing that supply chains for all of their parts will be present.

      --
      Dear Diary...today I was pompous and my sister was crazy.
    4. Re:As a strategy, it may not be bad... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      "by simply guessing that supply chains for all of their parts will be present."

      I'm sure it has occurred to them, but that doesn't mean there is no risk. In most cases, a given part for traditional ICE vehicles could be made by many different suppliers. Lose a supplier, for whatever reason, and you can pretty much guarantee that another will be able to fill the void. There are considerably fewer players in the market for the kind of batteries these cars require, and a disruption could leave them with incomplete cars that they can't sell. It would be like Ford being unable to get engine blocks at any price. Remember the flooding in SE Asia a few years back that took a big bite out of hard disk production? Drive prices soared for at least a year until production got back to normal. Now flood out a major battery supplier. I think most hybrid/EV cars are priced at just about the most they can get away with. Will companies like Volvo be laying in a surplus of batteries to mitigate a loss of supply or will they stick to JIT and be screwed?

      Volvo's experiment will be closely watched by rest of the auto industry I suspect.

    5. Re:As a strategy, it may not be bad... by phayes · · Score: 1

      The battery shortage is a well known choke point in the large scale production of electric vehicles that you cannot remove by waving your hands and saying "they're serious people, these guys from Volvo, I'm sure they've thought about the problem".

      Both Tesla & Daimler have addressed the problem by revealing their plans for procuring the necessary batteries. Why not Volvo?

      Volvo could make an announcement claiming that they would be powering their future vehicles with antimatter and I would be just as skeptical. Until you or Volvo come up with a plausible source for all the batteries they will be needing their announcement their plan to build a significant number of electric vehicles cannot be taken seriously.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    6. Re:As a strategy, it may not be bad... by epine · · Score: 1

      Electric motors actually become more efficient as they become more powerful, not less (upping the peak power requires lower resistance wiring, which wastes less energy when the vehicle is cruising).

      Ah, yes, the modern "overdrive" is a handy-dandy burly conduit demassifier.

      Only I'm not sure whether this cancels out drag effects once your heavy windings become so large as to erupt, steampunk style, from the hood, like giant copperhead engine minions. Can't have everything, I guess. Still, the efficiency with a stiff tail wind would be unrivalled. Up svelte periscope, and away!

  10. Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All automakers are going to more or less follow suit soon enough. The benefits of a mild hybrid system far outweigh the essentially nonexistent drawbacks, and if you actually convert the whole car to 48V, then there really are no drawbacks.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, basically just a bolt-on and then you get to drive solo in the carpool lane!

    2. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it more like a couple hundred volts? To minimize I*R losses between the battery packs/motor controller/charge-discharge controller/motors? So you don't have to have cables the size of what holds up the Golden Gate Bridge?

    3. Re:Mild Hybrids by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      You are mostly correct. Consider the strongest Tesla at 581kW. Assuming we do the same in one 48VDC motor we are talking more than 12kA !! Even more on the AC motor side. Even ignoring the massive wires (well bus bars) and converter costs, I don`t think this would be any safer than any higher voltage system, which is the general reason for going 48V.

      I`ve tested short circuits with 24V systems with 100A capability, and the arc is scary as fuck without a contactor to do the contact. I did it once by hand thinking it was safe, got a huge fireball as plus hit ground, bounced it slightly before reconnecting and the wire caught fire and welded stuck surprisingly quickly. With 12kA nominal capability I can`t even imagine. And the di/dt effects of parastic inductance could make all kinds of interesting effects

      That said, for a low end hybrid I can see it work. For instance a 16kW system with 400A could be doable.

    4. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW I'm not pulling 'a couple hundred volts' out of thin air: https://www.toyota-tech.eu/HYB...

    5. Re:Mild Hybrids by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I hope they just do range extenders, basically generators to top up the battery. Hybrids are a waste of time, so many drawbacks compared to EVs.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Isn't it more like a couple hundred volts? [...] So you don't have to have cables the size of what holds up the Golden Gate Bridge?

      It isn't. Think about your starter motor. The wire that feeds that is probably somewhere between 00 and 2 gauge, and that has to operate at typically somewhere 11-12 volts, and sometimes as low at 10 volts in order to meet expectations. In addition, we're talking here about a mild hybrid, with a small battery. It's not going to have long electric range, nor operate at full speed on electric-only. The benefit is that it's going to provide some regeneration, and allow you to use a smaller ICE because it doesn't have to do all the work of acceleration. You also get stop-start in the bargain, because you're upgrading the starter motor. All of this is going to significantly improve the city mileage, while still slightly improving the highway mileage. It won't reduce the system weight due to the smaller engine because of the larger electric motor (larger than the normal starter, anyway) and the battery, but it will improve the system efficiency. And if you still have to have a 12V system in the car, which is going to be the case for many if not most vehicles for the foreseeable future, if it even needs a 12V battery (it reasonably might if your ABS is still 12V) then the lead-acid battery is at least much smaller, and has smaller battery leads.

      Remember, this is not a system that is driving the vehicle around on electric power, or if it is, it's only doing it at very low speeds and for short periods. And it is a done deal that the mild hybrid systems that are coming to market now are 48V Li-Ion.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hybrids are a waste of time, so many drawbacks compared to EVs.

      The basic fundamental problem with EVs is just how many people cannot reasonably charge them at home at this time. Eventually, this will change, and they will become suitable for a larger percentage of the market. As it is, they suit the needs of many people, and by all means, I believe those people should purchase EVs ASAP. But they certainly do not suit the needs of enough people to justify the ICE going away, or even the EV taking the majority of the market share today.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Mild Hybrids by Solandri · · Score: 1

      My fear is that the move towards mild hybrids will de-emphasize the importance of good traffic management in cities (e.g. synchronized lights to reduce the number of red lights you'll hit). Most of the fuel savings for hybrids comes in city driving, where they can recoup about 1/3 of the kinetic energy whenever the car brakes. So they decrease the fuel wasted from poor traffic management.

      The problem with focusing solely on improving MPG is that it ignores other external losses. Adopting hybrids but ignoring traffic management means the cars will save fuel, but people's time will still be wasted needlessly at pointless red lights. Near my house there's a trio of lights which for some baffling reason are timed so if you get caught by the first red light, the next two lights are guaranteed to be red when you reach them. It can take well over 3 minutes to travel approximately 1000 feet, and the entire area is a parking lot during rush hour even though there's no backup leading to or away from it. In another spot, a light gives a 20 second green to the exit from a small shopping center parking lot every single cycle (light is red in the other three directions). I've driven past it every day for 2 years, and I've only seen someone exiting that shopping center three times, yet everyone has to wait 20 seconds every cycle as if there were cars exiting it all the time. Its green light badly needs to be regulated by a vehicle sensor.

    9. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is going to say "well, hybrids mean we're still saving energy even if the lights are mistimed, so we will just ignore all the accidents and lost sales due to inefficiency which lead to lost tax revenues. But making all the vehicles hybrids will still save energy lost in towns where they deliberately make the light patterns suck in order to keep you downtown longer to increase the chance that you'll stop and buy something just to get out of the damned car, or more to the point, in the far more numerous towns where they're just incompetent and couldn't get traffic to flow properly with another dimension to work with.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Mild Hybrids by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      No, straight up hybrids are not allowed in the car pool lane any more. Only full on EVs, and plug in hybrids, and they'll only be allowed in until jan 1st 2019.

    11. Re:Mild Hybrids by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      My fear is that the move towards mild hybrids will de-emphasize the importance of good traffic management in cities (e.g. synchronized lights to reduce the number of red lights you'll hit). Most of the fuel savings for hybrids comes in city driving, where they can recoup about 1/3 of the kinetic energy whenever the car brakes. So they decrease the fuel wasted from poor traffic management.

      Not a problem in Europe where Volvo mostly sells their cars - Europe doesn't use giant light controlled junctions in 99% of cases.

    12. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..no, you're completely and totally wrong, as is very often the case for you. Read this: https://www.toyota-tech.eu/HYB...
      It's a couple hundred volts. So you don't have massive line-loss due to the inherent resistance of copper wiring. ALL modern electric vehicles are going to have high-voltage motors so you don't waste precious battery power heating copper wiring to the motors. For the same reasons we don't string power transmission lines across hundreds of miles with only 220V running in them.

    13. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basic fundamental problem with EVs is just how many people cannot reasonably charge them at home at this time.

      you don't pump gas into your car in your driveway either

    14. Re:Mild Hybrids by blindseer · · Score: 1

      The only reason people demand that they be able to charge an EV at home is because it takes so long. It's terribly inconvenient to wait an hour to charge up a car at a public charging station. It's generally inconsequential to have it charge up while at home, where you can take off your shoes and have a beer while supper is in the oven.

      If an EV could be charged to 100% in 5, or even 15, minutes regularly and not be concerned about battery damage then we would not even bother with home charging systems. As it is we'll read about how an EV can be charged to 80% of max capacity in 30 minutes, and in the fine print is a disclaimer that this should not be done regularly since it can shorten the life of the battery.

      The issue of 80% charge might also not be such a big deal if the range was closer to that of a petroleum fueled car. Getting 400 or maybe even 500 miles on a tank with a piece of shit car is not unusual. Doing that in an EV means getting top of the line with the extra cost option of a high density battery. It also means an even longer charge time, where with a petroleum car it means a few more seconds at the pump.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    15. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ..no, you're completely and totally wrong, as is very often the case for you. Read this: https://www.toyota-tech.eu/HYB...

      Sorry, dumbshit coward, the Prius is not a mild hybrid. It's too bad you don't know what we're talking about, because maybe then you could have made a contribution. Unfortunately, you wouldn't have done so anyway, because that would be scary and you are a coward.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      you don't pump gas into your car in your driveway either

      That's because I can pump gas into my car and be off down the road in just a couple of minutes. It doesn't take best-case over an hour to refill it. Got any relevant objections?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Mild Hybrids by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Its green light badly needs to be regulated by a vehicle sensor.

      No, they don't need a sensor.

      In college I remember a stretch of road like you describe where if you hit one light you hit them all. Then I ran an experiment, I drove faster and faster until I didn't hit a red light any more. The posted limit was 35 mph but if I drove at 40 mph I would hit only one light. That's just fucked up, the city timed the lights to ENCOURAGE speeding.

      Where I live now many lights are run by sensors when in the past they were timed. Being that the roads are pretty flat and straight I could see the lights well in advance of reaching them and usually adjust my speed to catch the lights as they flipped and not have to stop. Now I have to stop. Every. Fucking, Time.

      In the past if I was in a hurry I knew I could adjust my speed just so to minimize traffic stops, I might not get there any faster really but I'd never have to stop and wait for a light. Now if I'm in a hurry the sensors encourage me to be a hotdog and stomp on the gas to get up to the light, and then lay on the brakes hard to stop. I've calmed some in time so I don't do that nearly as often as I used to, now I just scream at the windshield. I'm not sure the other drivers on the road have lost their hotdogging ways like I have.

      I've driven past it every day for 2 years, and I've only seen someone exiting that shopping center three times, yet everyone has to wait 20 seconds every cycle as if there were cars exiting it all the time.

      I've seen several cases of roads having a problem with speeding until a stop sign or stop light is installed. The stop forces people to moderate their speed. People learn to moderate their speed to the lights like I did, and as my college classmates did, so that stopping is minimized. Sure, it sucks to have to wait for that first light but if they are timed right, and you drive a reasonable speed, then you should hit just one red light on your way in or out of town.

      I've seen it both ways and I think that properly timed lights are much better at managing traffic than sensors at the intersections.

      That's in my humble opinion of course.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    18. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, straight up hybrids are not allowed in the car pool lane any more. Only full on EVs, and plug in hybrids, and they'll only be allowed in until jan 1st 2019.

      And of course, hydrogen vehicles. Non-plugins don't even get a tax credit any more, neither from CA nor the USA. But the systems are cheap enough and save enough fuel for the average driver such that it is worth it to pay the small premium for the system. Automakers are already beginning their conversions to 48V in order to save weight, and there is a significant push to convert all the assorted hardware in the car to 48V so that they don't need a parallel 12V system, which is why the mild hybrid systems are 48V. One battery, one starter/generator, one voltage. You get a battery of about the same size and weight as the battery you're taking out, but it does a lot more, and you pay basically no weight penalty for the starter/generator since it replaces... the starter and the generator :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Mild Hybrids by jensend · · Score: 1

      It often seems that denigrating mild hybrids is one of the few things fans of EVs and PHEVs and their detractors agree on. All the drawbacks and none of the benefits, fanboys on both sides often claim. But the facts simply don't back them up.

      If we can actually modernize vehicle electrical systems and move beyond legacy cruft, an automaker would be nuts not to use mild hybrid tech throughout its fleet. It really is a lot simpler than a full parallel hybrid, and a lot less of a total overhaul of the automotive world than depending on a series hybrid or range extender and huge batteries. Getting sizeable benefits in everyone's hands will do more for the environment than getting EVs in the hands of a select few.

      While it's true that most trips driven in the US could easily fit in any EV's range, it's also true that ~85% of trips are taken with only one occupant, yet single-seat cars haven't taken off. People will continue to buy cars for the uses they think they might have, not just their primary everyday use, and plenty of people will think of backcountry or cross-country trips they might take. It will take revolutionary changes before those kinds of trips are as easy in an EV as with gas.

    20. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you left a zero out, you meant 480v right?

    21. Re:Mild Hybrids by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think you left a zero out, you meant 480v right?

      Here kid, try this: go to google, and type "48v hybrid" and tell me what your top autocomplete is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oi. I own an electric. It's plugged in to a Level 2 charger right now. I wired it in the garage myself. It takes around four hours to charge all the way up. It's awesome. You don't know what you're talking about.

    23. Re:Mild Hybrids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that your use case favors filling up the tank. Many people don't drive more than 40 miles per day in the US. Most popular EVs can drive that distance per day without any problems. So, many of them can drive home and plug in over night while they are asleep, no problem. I realize that this use case probably won't work well, for now, with apartment dwellers and other living situations. As time goes on, employers could offer charging stations in their parking lots covered by solar panels over head. These would be providing shade for the vehicles and some protection from the weather as well, but that is something that we shall wait and see about. I'm thinking that their would need to be some kind of incentive for such a massive investment? ;-)

  11. New Model Lines Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the actual article what is meant is that starting in 2019 5 new model lines will be electric only, not that they will be changing all their existing models to electric. Given their model cycle it'll be a decade past that before all of their cars are electric or hybrid.

    1. Re:New Model Lines Only by shmlco · · Score: 1

      From the Volvo PR: "This means that there will in future be no Volvo cars without an electric motor, as pure ICE cars are gradually phased out and replaced by ICE cars that are enhanced with electrified options."

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  12. This marks the end of Volvo... by bobbied · · Score: 0

    The internal combustion powered engine and the automobiles they live in are far from becoming a thing of the past.

    This announcement is either a PR ploy which isn't serious or represents a self inflicted wound that will kill them.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:This marks the end of Volvo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is YOU that is about to go the way of the Dodo not Volvo.
      I run a PHEV and I didn't put any Gas in it during June. All my driving (350+ miles)was Electric and that Electricity came from my own PV system.
      Zero Co2.
      Some of us are doing our bit to combat Global Warming.

  13. Re:not market forces - govt regulation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that there are serious problems with PM2.5 and NOx pollution in many european cities.
    It has a cost on health and Diesel engines are a significant part of the problem.
    Oil based heating also contributes, but not in summer.

  14. Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people prefer to buy fast cars (like my corvette.) Until we can expect the same performance and range, there will always be a market for internet combustion engines.

    1. Re:Need for speed? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The worlds fastest supercar is fully electric. All modern supercars use electric turbines, which accelerate from a standing start and recover energy on braking and turns faster than fossil fuel only cars do.

      Adapt. It's 2017, not 1967.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Need for speed? by shmlco · · Score: 5, Informative

      2017 Chevy Corvette 0-60 in 3.6 sec. 1/4 mile in 12.3 sec. 296 mile range.

      2017 Tesla model S (sedan): 0-60 in 2.28 sec. 1/4 mile in 10.5 sec. 310 mile range.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    3. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worlds fastest supercar is fully electric.

      Statement not supported by facts. The bugatti chiron is not fully electric.

    4. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Number of times Tesla had won lemans. Zero

    5. Re:Need for speed? by IMightB · · Score: 1

      So, like, what's the time it takes each car to go 800 miles?

    6. Re: Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many people need to do endurance races like LeMans?

      Fact is the generation of electric cars are the worst this new tech will be, how much innovation do you think is happening with ICE technology, how much range versus performance (efficiency) will we see from ICE versus electric? Battery technology will improve in the short-term.

      The electric motor design is simple and will offer longer lifespan (and easier serviceability/replacement). Can't say the same for ICE (too many points of failure).

    7. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Le mans is endurance racing. So, you like your endurance Corvette, while he likes quick Tesla.

    8. Re:Need for speed? by Narcocide · · Score: 2, Informative

      That number is also 0 for the Corvette. What's your point again here?

    9. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, like, what's the time it takes each car to go 800 miles?

      so, like, what's the time it takes for each car to get to its next oil change?

      my stupid meme is just as stupid as your stupid meme

    10. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla range has gone from 140 miles to 335 miles (140% increase) in the last 5 years while charging time dropped from 5 hours at L2 charger to 1 hour at Supercharger.

    11. Re: Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also not the fastest supercar.

    12. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      2017 Tesla Model S 0-60 in 5.0, 1/4 mile in 13.6.
      Numbers quoted by above poster are for P100D variant (modified), a car which starts at $135,000.
      2017 Corvette starts at $55,000.

      Yes, if you have limitless money, electric cars are pretty cool.

    13. Re:Need for speed? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      Some people prefer to buy fast cars (like my corvette.) Until we can expect the same performance and range, there will always be a market for internet combustion engines.

      No problem, as long as you pay for the very high pollution cost associated with your choice.
      Currently, you do not. The market for internal combustion engines will be much smaller when the pollution cost is not externalized to the rest of the world.

    14. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corvette has 8 wins at Lemans. Tesla and every other piece of shit electric will have zero because they take to long to recharge.

    15. Re:Need for speed? by Ferretman · · Score: 0

      > Adapt. It's 2017, not 1967. When their price tags got down to rational levels, sure.

      Until then ICE SUVs are my only real option.

      Ferret

      --
      Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
    16. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is bull. The numbers for 0-60 on a base Model S 75 is 5.5, 5.2 ro a 75D, and 2.3 on a 100D with ludicrous model. you started the comparison with a 'vette, he did not. neither is a model S a middle class car and nor is a corvette a commuter car. So we may as well cut the bullshit out.
      A model 3 has a range of 215 miles and a 0-60 of 6-6.5 seconds per Tesla's claims. Very good numbers for a commuter car. It costs around 27K with zero frills and 7.5K in tax rebates (could be higher in certain states). This car is not for one with limitless money. Most folks who buy a low end BMW can afford this car. A majority of folks who buy a new full size car will be able to afford this car (though it does not claim to be full size - there's that).

    17. Re:Need for speed? by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      "2017 Tesla Model S 0-60 in 5.0, 1/4 mile in 13.6."

      Your numbers are out of date. Tesla just updated the car and even the base Model S 75 without dual motors can now hit 60 in 4.3 seconds and costs $69,500 but you also get a $7500 tax credit bringing it down to $62,000. For that you get a car that needs very little servicing and you can get free supercharging for the life of the car with a referral. I know which one I would prefer.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    18. Re:Need for speed? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So the Tesla only has to sit idle during the 'speed competition' for two or maybe three hours, whereas the 'vette has three or maybe four 5 minute refueling stops.

    19. Re: Need for speed? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Tell China that.

      It's 2017, not 2007.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    20. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that you get a car that needs very little servicing

      This is a lie. Tesla's are one of cars with the highest maintainer costs due to their shitty build quality.

    21. Re: Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also is the fastest supercar.

      Fixed that for you. 0-60 times isn't what makes a car fastest.

    22. Re:Need for speed? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Don't know which Corvette you have but Teslas are faster than your Corvette.
      Fastest Corvette is 3.8 0-60
      Fastest Tesla is 3..2
      Even my "non-performance" Tesla is 4.2 which is faster than most Corvettes.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    23. Re:Need for speed? by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      2017 Chevy Corvette 0-60 in 3.6 sec. 1/4 mile in 12.3 sec. 296 mile range. About USD 50,000

      2017 Tesla model S (sedan): 0-60 in 2.28 sec. 1/4 mile in 10.5 sec. 310 mile range. About USD 100,000

      Heck of a difference, but it looks like we are getting there. (Read this and weep, Jeremy Clarkson)

      Cleaner air. Quieter. And what will we do with all those petrol station ("gas" stations)?

      Of course the next step, moving away from private vehicle to shared ones will give an interesting opportunity for garage conversions - man cave? Gym? Model railway layout ... or maybe a space for yet more junk. Yeah, that.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    24. Re:Need for speed? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Relevance the Le Mans endurance race has to the real world: Zero.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    25. Re:Need for speed? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I can buy a second hand Leaf *from a dealer* for less than USD $13,000

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    26. Re:Need for speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla: Seats up to 7...

    27. Re:Need for speed? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That number is also 0 for the Corvette. What's your point again here?

      He's just upset that his Corvette doesn't qualify for racing in the Formula E

  15. Re: not market forces - govt regulation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In summer mopeds are the primary problem.

  16. you left out the other half of their announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hybrid? Who said anything about hybrid? These cars will be self-driving cars but will have the Swiss eject when the automobile detects a human in the driver seat trying to give verbal commands.

  17. Re:not market forces - govt regulation... by shmlco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Says someone who obviously wasn't around CA in the '70s. Thing is, "consumers" also want air they can breath, and water they can drink....

    Sulfates and other pollutants are directly related to acidification of rainfall and as such our streams, rivers, lakes, and groundwater; directly contribute to asthma and lung cancer and other health related issues; and, of course, to our carbon footprint.

    And, like coal, if an older technology can no longer do its job from both an economic and environmental standpoint, then, like horses and steam engines, it's time for it to go.

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  18. Re:Volvo sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German cars suck. They have some of the lowest reliability ratings in the world.

    Don't equate "cost" with "good car".

  19. Slashdot get the headline wrong... surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA: "While all of its new car lines will be "electrified" starting in 2019, for a few years Volvo will continue production of existing models that don't have electric motors."

  20. Electric vehicles cheaper than fossil fuels by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All automobile manufacturers project the cost to buy a fossil fuel vehicle will be more than for an all electric vehicle starting next model year.

    (yes, I invest in automobile firms, sorry if you never read the internal news)

    Adapt. Nobody cares for your failed fossil fuel religion.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Electric vehicles cheaper than fossil fuels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's total BS. SUV and Truck segments are what car companies are heavily invested in and where the profits are at.

    2. Re:Electric vehicles cheaper than fossil fuels by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      All automobile manufacturers project the cost to buy a fossil fuel vehicle will be more than for an all electric vehicle starting next model year.

      Could you clarify what you mean by that?

    3. Re:Electric vehicles cheaper than fossil fuels by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I said nothing about profits. I'm talking about consumer and fleet pricing.

      Adapt. The market owes you nothing for your failed fossil fuel religion.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Electric vehicles cheaper than fossil fuels by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I am referencing the cost to the consumer, or the purchaser of fleet vehicles.

      Not the profit factor for the manufacturer or distributor.

      In fact, the markup on the soon to be too expensive fossil fuel trucks and SUVs is much higher for dealers and manufacturers, but the market cares nothing for their profit motives, only that the end price be balanced between supply and demand. The invisible hand has no religion, and doesn't care if those slow (or too fast) to adapt go bankrupt. That's what capitalism is.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  21. Re:not market forces - govt regulation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "So - the govt is pressuring the markets, not the consumers"

    Hey, sometimes its necessary. I think someone was relating a story in an interview a while back (Bill Nye maybe) about how when he was younger his family rented a cabin somewhere, all of the homes in the area had to keep a pan of gasoline/turpentine at their doors to clean their feet because the oil slick on the beach from tankers purging their tanks. I'm sure that the tanker companies were fine with dumping excess crude oil into the ocean as it saved them and their customers money, it also was one heck of a headache for the people living anywhere near the logistics chain and was wreaking havoc on the environment.

  22. Re: Volvo sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a pretty bold statement. Got any links to back that up?

    I have one that shows Porsche, Mercedes, and BMW near the top in reliability:
    http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2017-vehicle-dependability-study

    Besides that, my personal experience leads me to believe you are full of crap...

    Prove me wrong.

    J

  23. An Interesting Move by Ferretman · · Score: 1

    Hopefully it's going to work for them. I'm a bit surprised they have (or are projected to have) that much market demand but good on them!

    I'd love to have an electric SUV, once they shave a zero off the pricetag. That'll be a bit.

    Ferret

    --
    Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
  24. Re: Volvo sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Made in Alabama or Tennessee.

  25. Waiting for plug-in electric light pickup truck by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    That and subsidized home high voltage charger installation. You want this technology adopted quicker? Give people an incentive rather than putting roadblocks in their way.

    1. Re:Waiting for plug-in electric light pickup truck by enjar · · Score: 1

      My power company is giving away Level 2 chargers. The trick is that they are wifi controlled so they can drop them to Level 1 chargers during certain hours. Given that Volt can charge completely on Level 1 overnight, this is a no-brainer for me. I agree on the pickup, too. They are by far the vehicle the American public votes for most as their favorite, and an electric motor with full torque available at 0 RPM could be very useful for towing things, among many other positives.

    2. Re:Waiting for plug-in electric light pickup truck by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Electric motors are very good at having low-end torque, which is why locomotives are diesel-electric instead of the diesel engine directly connecting to the drive wheels (not a train fan, so I'm guessing that's the reason why). Electric motors can be designed specifically with that in mind.

      Would a WiFi jammer keep it at Level 2 charging for you? ;-)

    3. Re:Waiting for plug-in electric light pickup truck by enjar · · Score: 1

      As it works out, only two of the hours would have any impact on my life so it's probably not worth the time/hassle. If I wanted full control I could always just pony up the bucks for my own EVSE. The one they are offering for free is not my first choice, but there's approximately 500 reasons why it's a better choice.

    4. Re:Waiting for plug-in electric light pickup truck by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      That and subsidized home high voltage charger installation.

      There was a 30% tax credit, that included things like electric vehicle charging equipment, that was around for many years that expired at the end of 2015 or 2016.

  26. What market segments? by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    Is this an announcement that Volvo is getting out of the heavy truck market? They make some of the best equipment in that market.

    1. Re:What market segments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would a switch to EV/Hybrid force them out of the heavy truck market? Plenty of manufactures are going that way. Can you imagine the regenerative brake energy recovery of a fully loaded 18 wheeler or the weight savings from decreasing the size of those gargantuan diesel engines & tanks?

    2. Re:What market segments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a different Volvo. While they share the name, and used to be part of the same group, the the Volvo group actually sold Volvo Car Company to Ford back in 1999.

    3. Re:What market segments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two completely different companies.

    4. Re: What market segments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Volvo CE and Volvo Cars are two different companies. Volvo Cars is a Chinese subsidiary and Volvo CE is a Swedish company traded on a public stock market.

    5. Re:What market segments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While this has nothing to do with the other (heavy truck) Volvo, the heavy truck market is also looking at various hybrid/EV technologies. For short runs it is possible today in some cases, and for long haul perhaps the swappable battery concept will pop up again (stop at the truck stop, have the batteries exchanged while you do your business). And while the "Tesla Semi" may be the most hyped variant, all the major truck manufacturers are looking into how to make it viable.

  27. A drop in the bucket by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Volvo is a high-end, low-volume manufacturer. Worldwide sales are about half a million out of total worldwide sales of nearly 90 million.

    Whether this is a smart move in their chosen market segment remains to be seen. But it's not going to noticeably move the needle in the overall market.

  28. Not really supprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What surprises me is that all major manufactures didn't start towards this years ago. IC Engines are dreadfully inefficient, difficult to engineer/manufacture & can be a pain to integrate into different frames. I think the only thing that has kept ICs in the game is that the logistics chain is already there and perhaps partly the limitations of batteries. But with Hybrids (non idiotic ones anyways) most of those issues go away, just use an electric drivetrain, a small battery/capacitor pack and a very small IC/Turbine generator to keep the system in the green. You get a major efficiency boost from regenerative braking, limited idle time, an efficient generator design due to the lack of RPM range, decreased weight due to the lack of a heavy IC engine (and heavy battery pack), etc and a much more simple design and manufacturing chain.

  29. The roar of the internal combustion engine. by spoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember when I was a kid, growing up in Miami. We would go to the unlimited hydroplane races at Marine Stadium on Key Biscayne. Back then, all the Unlimited Hydro's were powered by Rolls Royce Merlin engines. Yea, surplus engines from P-51's and Spitfires. There was/is nothing like the sound of that Merlin engine screaming by. If you've never heard it, I can't explain it. Fast forward a few years into the future, and I attend the Hydro races in Detroit, and all the unlimited Hydro's are using jet engines. The go by and it's just a "whoosh" sound. All the fun and excitement were gone. Last Hydro race I ever went to. Or take a dragster or funny car burning Nitro, that sound, that smell. Yea, the electrics and jet powered race vehicles may be faster, but they're just boring. This may sound silly, but soon there will be a generation that never knows the sound of a tightly tuned internal combustion engine on a Formula 1 or even a Ducati. We won't even get behind the wheel, we will just whoosh along in boring electric vehicles. I think Jeff Beck said about self driving cars, who the hell would want that. What's the fun in that. Hell, I even miss the sound of a raspy old Bultaco, Husky or CZ 2-Stroke. I'll go back to yelling at the clouds now.

    1. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If enough people truly care they will make "classic" races with ICE engines. Quit yer bellyaching.

    2. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I even miss the sound of a raspy old Bultaco, Husky or CZ 2-Stroke. I'll go back to yelling at the clouds now.

      Those old onion-in-the-belt engines were awesome to behold, but they also spewed unburned fuel out of their arseholes like an angry fat man who hit every buffet in Vegas in one day. Now we can make electric dirt bikes that have fantastic performance, don't shake your hindquarters into puzzle pieces, and which will still have juice left when you're all tired out. They might be less interesting to watch, but manufacturers don't make the big bucks selling bikes to racers. They make 'em selling them to customers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by ledow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Boring electric vehicles that have almost no "top speed" and can accelerate faster than just about anything on the planet.

      I have always suspected, and it's now being borne out, that being "into" fast cars was nothing to do with performance, or handling, or engineering. It was about making loud noises and getting dirty and feeling manly.

      Now that every car on the road can do 130mph, nobody cares. Now that electric cars/bikes out-accelerate everything else, nobody cares. Now that even Harley Davidson have electric models, nobody cares.

      It was never about the engineering. It was about making noise, and being seen to make noise.

      Formula One is as boring as fuck, since they keep making silly rules to dial everything back to "safety". Noisy cars are boring as fuck, since every decent car is whisper silent and can out-perform all the others. Even convertibles - why on EARTH is it at all fashionable to show the world that you can't afford air-con and would rather have every bug smacking you in the face?

      Fact is, the ICE's days are numbered. Environmental factors, cost, wear on parts, etc. Almost every car on the road is technically better than a Formula One car from my parent's generation. You can't really speed anyway because of the cameras, and even when you do, they are designed so that it doesn't actually feel fast at all (a dangerous combination).

      How about we get over "WOAH! CARS ARE BIG AND LOUD AND NOISY AND LOOK AT ME COMING!", finally? Most kids these days have zero interest in cars, for the same reason they have zero interest in computers - the point are which they were "amazing" was in the previous generation. Now everything's a Formula 1, and you can't do anything with it.

      My technician bought himself a brand new car last year. Was telling me all about specs, sporty wheels, such-and-such-a-limited-edition, etc. Spent a fortune. Turned out that, when we checked the specs, the car I had bought a few years before outperformed every spec he gave but didn't look like a terrible boy-racer tricked-out car from the 80's, could carry 5 and a ton of luggage, and was whisper-quiet internally.

      Cars are no longer the must-have teenager item. They have Uber if they want to go somewhere. As such, those still clinging to that idea are clinging to a childhood, not to a fascination with engineering. We've been using sub-standard engines for decades because nobody "wanted" an electric car. Now that they do, they win on almost every metric.

      P.S. I don't like electric cars, but because of practicality - purchase cost, replacement cost, range. My father was also a motor engineer for decades, built all his own tricked-out cars, did all kinds of stuff in his youth, massive garage dedicated to the hobby, etc. He bought a second-hand Volvo last year.

      Cars are just utility vehicles now. And so the sporty ones make no sense. And a battery-powered Harley will beat just about anything away at the lights. Fact is, nobody really cares any more except the guy who bought the Harley because of the Harley name.

    4. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This may sound silly, but soon there will be a generation that never knows the sound of a tightly tuned internal combustion engine on a Formula 1 or even a Ducati."

      I too will miss the days of cranky, difficult-to-maintain, high performance engines the same way I miss the clatter of computers reading punch tape and Hollerith cards.

      Don't worry. People will still roll out their old jallopies from time-to-time and show the young-uns how it all used to work.

      Now excuse me, because I too have a few clouds to yell at.

    5. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by bluegutang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      self driving cars, who the hell would want that

      A commuter driving the same route to work every day. Or a parent dropping off the kids and doing shopping.

      In other words, the vast majority of drivers.

    6. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      It was never about the engineering. It was about making noise, and being seen to make noise.

      You hit around it, but you really missed the point. It was about more than the noise. It was about engineering. But mostly, it was about challenging your mates and building a better "it" than they build. It was about making you car do more than what the other guys could get their cars to do. It was about building a computer that would play the latest games smoother than the other guys in your group. The noise was just a side-effect that showcased your accomplishment. The liquid cooling setup and LEDs just showcased your accomplishment.

      Those things used to be hard to come by. That's why your father had a shop dedicated to it. Now, the run of the mill electric car or PC runs circles around what the most knowledgeable hand tuning could do a generation ago. But, the desire to "outperform" the competition is a part of the human experience. I look forward to what the next great challenge will be.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi dumbass,

      Formula One cars are faster than they have ever been. This, with a 1.6 liter turbocharged V6. They don't make much noise compared to yesteryear. Fans attending races are unhappy because the thundering noise was part of the "wow" factor. But, they are faster. As to why they are not even faster. Well, it's bad for business if the drivers' abilities should be exceeded by the performance of the cars. Can you grasp that?

    8. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      This. 327 times this.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      If it was about engineering then that Miami guy wouldn't complain about jet engines. They are marvels of engineering compared to piston engines.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How about we get over "WOAH! CARS ARE BIG AND LOUD AND NOISY AND LOOK AT ME COMING!", finally?

      I give a shit what my car sounds or looks like to anyone else. What I care about is what it sounds like to me, and what it looks like to me. Someone once said that if you don't turn around to look at your car at least once as you walk away, you've got the wrong car. I want my car's styling to say something positive to me. Oddly, the styling of my 1998 A8 is for me (all the style is on the inside, what there is of it) but the exhaust note is for everyone else, you can only hear it inside the car when you totally mat it because of the hundreds of pounds of insulation in the vehicle.

      It's just more fun to drive when the engine makes exciting noises. Even my 1982 300SD makes this great little snarling sound when the downshift occurs under full power. And since it's totally gutless, you get to hear that sound fairly often :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re: The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you haven't been to a NASCAR race

    12. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I have always suspected, and it's now being borne out, that being "into" fast cars was nothing to do with performance, or handling, or engineering. It was about making loud noises and getting dirty and feeling manly.

      I can only speak for myself, but the only time I could watch a car race is when there was a decent amount of in-car footage. That really gives you a feel for what the drivers are doing and thinking and how much skill is involved. Watching cars on the track, whether in real life or on TV, isn't that exciting.

      If you really want loud and dirty, there's always demolition derbies and skid racing. You don't need massive horsepower for that. :)

    13. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      I remember when I was a kid, growing up in Miami. We would go to the unlimited hydroplane races at Marine Stadium on Key Biscayne. Back then, all the Unlimited Hydro's were powered by Rolls Royce Merlin engines. Yea, surplus engines from P-51's and Spitfires. There was/is nothing like the sound of that Merlin engine screaming by. If you've never heard it, I can't explain it. Fast forward a few years into the future, and I attend the Hydro races in Detroit, and all the unlimited Hydro's are using jet engines. The go by and it's just a "whoosh" sound. All the fun and excitement were gone. Last Hydro race I ever went to. Or take a dragster or funny car burning Nitro, that sound, that smell. Yea, the electrics and jet powered race vehicles may be faster, but they're just boring. This may sound silly, but soon there will be a generation that never knows the sound of a tightly tuned internal combustion engine on a Formula 1 or even a Ducati. We won't even get behind the wheel, we will just whoosh along in boring electric vehicles. I think Jeff Beck said about self driving cars, who the hell would want that. What's the fun in that. Hell, I even miss the sound of a raspy old Bultaco, Husky or CZ 2-Stroke. I'll go back to yelling at the clouds now.

      I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. Despite all the religion-fuelled comments here, the infernal combustion engine isn't going anywhere soon. It's way too cheap and plentiful.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    14. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Even convertibles - why on EARTH is it at all fashionable to show the world that you can't afford air-con and would rather have every bug smacking you in the face?

      I'm with you everywhere except here. Convertibles still have windscreens, never have bug issues, and have nothing to do with aircon and everything to do with feeling the wind in your hair and the sun on your head.

      I would happily drive an electrical convertible despite the reduced mileage that entails.

    15. Re:The roar of the internal combustion engine. by ledow · · Score: 1

      And it's STILL BORING. They all finish within hundreds of a second of each other and spend most of the race sitting waiting for a "legal" overtaking opportunity and gaming the race-order.

      I'd much rather that they said "Ok, you can only use a 1.0 litre engine, whatever you get out of it, and we only have safety restrictions not any particular "type" of engine / fuel / devices". At least then the engineering has some immediate real world relevance, the cars will be within driver's skill to handle, and you might actually win based on expertise rather than carbon-copying every other car out on the track so that you all finish with the blink of an eye of each other.

      Formula One is now one of the dullest "sports" I've ever witnessed, nearly on a par with cricket. Put mute on and tell me that it doesn't just look like someone parading a line of new vehicles around a test track to try to auction them off.

  30. s/only make/make only/ by johnw · · Score: 1

    The summary as it stands does not say what it means to say. Why is it so hard to position the word "only" in the right place in a sentence?

  31. It's not as impressive as it sounds first by thenitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first time you read the title, it seems like Volvo will only sell electric cars in 2 years time and they will become another Tesla.

    Then, if you pay attention, it says that starting 2019, all new models will have an electric engine in them. Yes, this includes mild hybrids, basically energy recovery systems where the electric engine only gives a boost, but it's too small to drive on electric power alone. And yes, they will keep producing the old models for a while.

    This is good news, but by no means earth-shattering. I understand most of the European manufacturers will introduce mild hybrids across their range, due to very strict emission standards coming 2020. A PR coup for Volvo, for making public a decision that everyone in the industry will eventually take, and soon.

  32. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Volvo will be out of business by 2025.

  33. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ford and GM will eat Volvo's "shorts" by selling gasoline engine cars in Europe!

    Time to buy F and GM stock!

  34. Polestar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who saw Polestar and thought "stripper"? Excuse me, "exotic dancer".

  35. Slashdot news alert: Priuses aren't profitable? by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Someone had better tell toyota, they've been making them over a decade now! how the heck are they not bankrupt?

  36. Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Volvo actually announced that all newly designed cars released after 2018 would be partially electric. They did NOT say they would make no more gas-only cars. They have just released the new 2018 XC60 the 2nd version of their largest selling car. They have released several other gas-only cars recently. All of those cars will be in production for many years.

    Also, do the math. They said their goal is to have about 1M e-cars by 2025 - 8 new model years from now. They sell about 500K cars per year and have high hopes for strong increases in total sales with all their recent gas-only models.

  37. Goalpost shift instead of gear shift by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Consider a drive train with ICE -> transmission -> electric motor -> differential -> wheels

    Not what you were describing above as you well know when you wrote " People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it".
    What's with the utterly shameless desire to "win" all the time? It's just like when you were trying to tell people earlier that plutonium is some harmless thing that doesn't need to be treated with respect.

    1. Re:Goalpost shift instead of gear shift by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Not what you were describing above as you well know when you wrote " People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it".

      The process of shifting without using the clutch is analogous to not having a clutch at all. I've seen people drive light trucks where the clutch pedal would break on them. A light truck (and the not too shabby power to weight ration that comes with it) worn tires, an experienced driver, and it's apparently not to difficult to drive. Having to stop on an uphill slope at a stop light can mean some grinding of gears and squealing of tires but it will go. Give the truck a little "boost" with an electric motor, and a little computer to automate the process, and you don't need the clutch. The linkages in the transmission effectively become "the clutch" but there is no "clutch" as people would recognize it. Instead of a large friction clutch that can wear out there could be simple dog clutches that, assuming the motor and computer do their jobs, would not wear any more than any other part of the transmission.

      What's with the utterly shameless desire to "win" all the time?

      Pot. Kettle. Black. I simply do not appreciate having words put in my mouth and/or be called a fool.

      It's just like when you were trying to tell people earlier that plutonium is some harmless thing that doesn't need to be treated with respect.

      I never said that.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Goalpost shift instead of gear shift by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The process of shifting without using the clutch is analogous to not having a clutch at all

      The clutch it still there, doing it's job, whether the pedal to stop it doing it's job is connected or not.

  38. in the meantime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the meantime... countries like Denmark, will continue to depend deeply on gasoline and diesel powered busses, cars, trucks, trains, boats, airplanes etc.... because of extreme taxes!

    I am not yet 40! Still I most likely won't live long enough to see electric vehicles become dominant in Denmark.
    I drive around in an old diesel car without filter, because new cars and especially electric cars are crazy expensive!
    Try justifying buying a Tesla at 3 times its normal cost, because of taxes!

    At this rate, CUBA and the rest of the world, will have electric only cars, long before Denmark!

  39. Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

    What's with clueless people delivering lectures on topics they know very little about after an obvious fuckup? If you had been studying engineering in the late 1990s I could have been one of your "professors" that you are using as your appeal to authority.
    The pedal is a different thing to the plate!

    Just look it up! Take a look at the model T transmission and brake bands while you are at it since that is simple enough that it will add to your understanding of what you were trying to describe above with your shifted goalposts.

    1. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      The pedal is a different thing to the plate!

      I know that. Please explain the flaw in my logic rather than just say I don't know what I'm talking about, professor.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Please explain the flaw in my logic

      You've just been attempting to distract from your stupid statement where you seemed to forget that the pedal is not actually the clutch - here it is again:

      People do clutchless shifting all the time once they learn the proper way to do it, and not trash the transmission either

      The clutch is still obviously operating in those situations, it just is not disengaged during the change.

    3. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I know that. Please explain the flaw in my logic

      Where you wrote as if a direct drive was in use instead of a clutch slipping enough to allow people to change gears without disengaging.

    4. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Was that so hard?

      I'll explain further here on not needing a traditional clutch as I propose. If you have an electric motor, and computer controlling the speed, driving the wheels and the output of the transmission, and an ICE, with the same computer controlling it's speed, then the computer can match the gear ratios exactly with each gear shift. The accelerator is not an engine throttle, it's a "drive by wire" input to the computer telling it how much power should be applied to the wheels. There's no sychros, the computer is the synchro. No squealing of tires, unless the computer allows it and the driver wants it. No slippage in a clutch because the computer is matching the rotational speed of every part of the transmission precisely.

      Computers are cheap, metal is expensive. Make the computer complex and the drive train simple and you can get a lot of performance with little cash.

      Does that make sense now?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    5. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm only making a fuss about it because you did a goalpost shift to pretend your really stupid comment never happened.
      No point trying to "teach" me about something most people on this site are more aware of than yourself.

    6. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      If you have an electric motor, and computer controlling the speed, driving the wheels and the output of the transmission, and an ICE, with the same computer controlling it's speed, then the computer can match the gear ratios exactly with each gear shift

      Close, good idea if not new and you don't need a computer: Scroll down to "Design".
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VK_4501_(P)

    7. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      A failure to comprehend on your part does not equate to a moving of goalposts on my part.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    8. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Right, not a new idea., just not common. The link you gave shows an example of a pretty typical electric drive system for large vehicles. Not a hybrid since there is no means to provide electric power except from the engines on board. I do see how that could be he basis of a series hybrid though.

      What I described would be called a parallel-series mild hybrid. As I propose using a relatively small electric motor it could not operate (for long at least) without the ICE running. Chevy offered something similar in their light trucks to what I proposed for a while but sales weren't great so it did not last long. Shifting the primary driver from the ICE to the electric motor and you have something like the Chevy Volt. I'm having trouble verifying it but as I recall the Volt had a simple single speed transmission, it could engage a direct link from the ICE to the wheels only when cruising. This was to improve efficiency further while not adding significant weight with a full size ICE and multiple speed transmission.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    9. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Right, not a new idea., just not common

      Locomotives.
      Not a good day for you at all is it?

    10. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A failure to comprehend on your part

      Please stop pretending such things. Your comment was stupid.

    11. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I was referring to parallel-series hybrids not being common, not the diesel electric.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    12. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Some of those, and ships (notably submarines) do exactly as you suggest.
      Just give up - the clutch comment was stupid.

    13. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      A submarine is not a car.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    14. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why not powering a goalpost on wheels then since there's so much motion going on? Instead of so much deflection why not move onto something else? All the mistake showed was that it was outside of the field of things you know, nothing worse - just a petty "beige box is the hard drive" sort of trivial misunderstanding - why so much effort to "win" and to try to convince someone like me who has read far too many of your posts to ever respect you?

    15. Re:Just look it up by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I don't even know what you want from me any more.

      I thought we were talking about hybrid cars. You bring up locomotives, tank destroyers, and submarines. None of those are hybrids (all energy comes from the ICE on board). None of them are parallel-series hybrids (all power to move the vehicle comes solely from the electric motor). And, none of them are cars.

      I'm sure now your are just waiting to point out that there are electric hybrid trains because they can operate on a standard track, using diesel power, or with a third rail, using grid power. Or that there are some that use regen braking and batteries. Still not a car. Still no mechanical transmission between the ICE and the wheels. Also, still "not common" transmission type, even among trains.

      It's a nice day so I'm going to go outside for a bit and drive my goalpost around the backyard.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    16. Re:Just look it up by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I don't even know what you want from me any more.

      Yes you do - you just prefer to "win" over honesty even with something so utterly trivial as not knowing a technical detail of something outside of your field.
      So much evasion, distraction and an appeal to authority over something that just does not matter - showing absolute and utter contempt for people unfortunate enough to read your little word games.