Slashdot Mirror


Chicago To Make Future Plans a Graduation Requirement (thehill.com)

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanual's recently approved plan will require high school students show their plans for the future before obtaining their diploma. "Students will soon have to show that they've secured a job or received a letter of acceptance to college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military in order to graduate," reports The Hill. From the report: "We are going to help kids have a plan, because they're going to need it to succeed," Emanuel told the Post. "You cannot have kids think that 12th grade is done." But critics say the district may not be able to provide mentoring to help needy students when the rule takes effect in 2020. "It sounds good on paper, but the problem is that when you've cut the number of counselors in schools, when you've cut the kind of services that kids need, who is going to do this work?" Karen Lewis, president of the Chicago Teachers Union, told the Post. "If you've done the work to earn a diploma, then you should get a diploma. Because if you don't, you are forcing kids into more poverty."

399 comments

  1. Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Not Stuff that Matters

    1. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm done with this site. The moderators are children.

    2. Re:Not News for Nerds by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      Education is a nerdy matter.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So many -1's yet no comments defending you. You don't even try to hide how pathetic you are for downmodding people that point out how sad you are.

    4. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This site was nice while it lasted, I'm out.

    5. Re:Not News for Nerds by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 2

      I disagree. It matters because it's adding an unnecessary stipulation that really shouldn't be implemented.

    6. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What defines "unnecessary"?

      It seems to make common sense that if you want an education to actually mean something, it has to manifest into something in the future. At least the basic education parts of education, like high school. I suppose people could just go to college for personal fulfillment. No one goes to high school to feel fulfilled. You go to high school to at least give you the basic preparations for life - basic math and science and literature skills. Life skills should be a part. Planning for your future is part of life's skills.

      The problem I see with the plan is, what happens to the kids that can't get into an approved "plan"? If they can't find a job? If the military won't take them (and technically you need a diploma to get in, soo...)? A gap year program? Wtf is that, we don't even do that in the US like in Europe.

      Now, if it's just a loose requirement, like "The kid said they plan on doing this, so technically, they planned," then it's a useless errand, except for maybe incentivizing aimless kids to do something by planning appropriate and talking to someone about the steps they will need to take next.

      Sounds good on paper, questionable to implement if its a hard requirement.

    7. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a constructive comment!

      we should construct a scenario where beauhd can positively, and constructively, suck on my DAMN balls

    8. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lol u dumbass millenial

    9. Re:Not News for Nerds by nnet · · Score: 2

      presuming again? Instead of behaving child-like, just don't respond. You're an editor here, behave like one, and not like some thinskinned leader of an alleged free country.

    10. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *I* decide if I want my education to mean something. No one else. This isn't Soviet 'Meristan, but its getting there.

    11. Re:Not News for Nerds by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Constructive comments only.

      Constructive comments for nerds.
      Constructive comments that matter.

      Fucking snowflake.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    12. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You need to go. You're killing this site.

    13. Re:Not News for Nerds by vtcodger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Education is important, but it's not clear this has anything much to do with education. This is about a probably nutty idea that punishes 17-18 year olds for not having a clear idea what they want to do with their lives. Or maybe it punishes them for having such an idea if it isn't conventional.

      My opinion. The kids did the school work. Give them their damn diploma.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    14. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Extending the reach and size of Chicago's government.

    15. Re:Not News for Nerds by jopsen · · Score: 1

      When I graduated HTX, akin to technical high school, in Denmark, my average-grade was multiplied by 1.02 in the application to University.. This was a tiny bump given to students who applied for an education within 2 years... Intended to encourage people to move on quick.

      I don't recall if it was on my diploma or if it only affected my application... In practice it has little effect, but encourages people to move on, because everybody is talking about it :)

      I went to study CS which has so few applicants that anyone who graduates high school is guaranteed admission, so it made no difference to me (In Denmark most University slots are allocated by average-grades; with some ~25% allocated by an interview process -- money buys you nothing)

    16. Re:Not News for Nerds by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You might want to read the username before you feed the trolls next time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know people in their 60s who don't know what they wanna do when they grow up.

      This is just a power grab to keep people in the shit house longer.

    18. Re: Not News for Nerds by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, a lot of them will settle for being a dishwasher or janitor. our neighbor has a son who is in the 7th grade and does calculus in his head and wants to be a pilot. his mother is a housekeeper and father is a local truck driver. go figure.

    19. Re:Not News for Nerds by yobjob · · Score: 2

      The punishment is potentially catastrophic. Imagine not being able to afford a college degree for your chosen career because 3 years earlier you were forced to go to college and do any old course to earn your damn high school certificate.

    20. Re:Not News for Nerds by RabidReindeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd say that this lines up perfectly with the current trend of withholding benefits to people unless they work for them.

      If a graduate doesn't have a plan to "hit the ground running", then he/she is more likely to be a drain on the public coffers and we wouldn't want to see our hard-earned tax dollars wasted by some muzzy-minded HS graduate would we? Come to think of it, why don't we demand a drug test too? Our local Republican legislature is really big on thing like this.

      Speaking from real life, however, I can say that having a goal and actually being able to move towards that goal at age 18 aren't the same thing. I'm afraid that neither educational, home or community environments left me with any clue on how to advance to the next stage. I just muddled through until eventually I managed to sort of fall into a track that led ultimately to a career as a happy taxpayer.

    21. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously didn't read the proposal. Nobody is forced to do anything other than have a plan. Executing it is not required.

    22. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be easier to just reinstate the draft? Or require 2 years of military enlistment?

      That's not flame bait, by the way. Many countries are successful with this type of program. It was a big part of my parent's (likely many of your grand parent's) shared sense of purpose and responsibility as US citizens.

      I think it is a larger issue than just Chicago or Illinois though. Like limiting the size of soft drink in you city, it won't work on a local level.

    23. Re: Not News for Nerds by bobschmagogee · · Score: 1

      "Students will soon have to show that they've secured a job or received a letter of acceptance to college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military in order to graduate," - sounds like you have to a least begin to execute the plan by showing proof. That's more than just a plan.

    24. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because in your eyes, it only affects the "colored" people, right

      Go fuck yourself with a red hot iron dildo

    25. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta have that F-35 warplane money! Fuck the poor, infact fuck everybody! There are people to kill on the other side of the world!

    26. Re:Not News for Nerds by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2

      Education is important, but it's not clear this has anything much to do with education. This is about a probably nutty idea that punishes 17-18 year olds for not having a clear idea what they want to do with their lives. Or maybe it punishes them for having such an idea if it isn't conventional.

      My opinion. The kids did the school work. Give them their damn diploma.

      I figure that if they live in Chicago they've been punished enough already. If you live in Chicago your plan should be to find a job elsewhere and leave before it craters completely.

    27. Re:Not News for Nerds by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Add to your observation, a society that is winding down opportunities to participate, other than the upper spectrum of the professional classes.

      This Rahm move is the first stage of a grift. There will be introduced a whole new opportunity for private, post-academic life counseling "services" - similar to the "math training centers" for the aspirational.

      The rest will be more effectively bound to a school-to-prison scheme, which will swell in volume and record commensurate record shareholder gains. "They didn't even want to graduate" after all. Now they are assembling small electronics for 5 to 10.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    28. Re:Not News for Nerds by mydn · · Score: 2

      It punishes them for not wanting to tell the government about their plans.

    29. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not the real BeauHD.

    30. Re:Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I plan to be a gangsta rappa

    31. Re:Not News for Nerds by WhiplashII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Um, Chicago is 200% Democrat, not Republican.

      200% because all the dead people vote Democrat too.

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    32. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. If your going to somehow legislate 18 year olds have to have plans just to graduate, when graduating in the shithole of chicongo is hard enough, might as well draft them into either military or civil service. Rahm can go fuck himself.

    33. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just applying to colleges costs money which not everyone can afford to waste just to get the paper

    34. Re: Not News for Nerds by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I don't even fix my own home.

    35. Re: Not News for Nerds by aliquis · · Score: 1

      There's really just two choices.
      A cuck or a Nazi.

    36. Re: Not News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did BeauHD acquire his stellar reputation, such that anyone would fall for this?

    37. Re:Not News for Nerds by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      And if Democrats weren't willing to adopt Republican concepts on occasion, we wouldn't have Obamacare.

      Florida's Republican legislature wanted all welfare recipients to be drug-tested so our tax dollars wouldn't be "wasted". But the legislators also receive our tax dollars, and while stoned poor people may lie around doing nothing all day, stoned legislators are likely to pass laws!

  2. Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanual's recently approved plan will require high school students show their plans for the future before obtaining their diploma.

    One of those "means well" but it's not going to work as well as he thinks. I remember even I straight out of high school wasn't absolutely sure what I was going to do.

    1. Re: Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/chicago-wont-allow-high-school-students-to-graduate-without-a-plan-for-the-future/2017/07/03/ac197222-5111-11e7-91eb-9611861a988f_story.html

    2. Re:Means well, but... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Need a high school diploma to get a decent job, but can't get the diploma until you have a job. How to make more burger flippers.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell, I finished high school 23 years ago and I still am not sure what I want to do. I've had wildly varying and interesting jobs that have taken me all over the world and I wouldn't trade that for anything.

    4. Re:Means well, but... by Darinbob · · Score: 3

      I knew a lot of people in high school whose plan was to get married. Honest. Then there were those who stayed home to help care for ailing family.

      If they only needed to articulate a plan this would be ok, but to actually have secured a job, training, college, etc, that's suddenly very difficult. The economy sucks right now, and it may very well suck even more in the future if employment rates fall. What do you do if all of your job applications are rejected? You can't even get going on a job while still actively studying in high school, no one's going to let you skip class to go to a job interview, and if you start job hunting early who's going to want to hire someone who can't start until summer?

      Then the catch-22 of not being able to get a job without diploma in hand, and can't get a diploma without the job offer in writing.

      Maybe best bet if grades are decent is get a spot at a junior college as tuition is still cheap and you don't have to actually attend once you get the high school diploma. But if the grades are good enough to normally graduate from high school, but not good enough to get in a JC (a C- average) then what?

      I never heard of a gap year program. Everyone I know who did gap year just did it with no plan and certainly no formal program, and they did the gap year precisely because they had no plan.

      Maybe what this requirement will do is increase the number of people taking the GED test.

    5. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rahm Emanual isn't exactly known for thinking these kinds of things through. This is why Chicago has turned into a complete shithole. When a crowd of people hear shots fired there, they scream and hit the deck, but then after a few seconds they just get back up and resume what they were doing like nothing happened. Why? Because eventually you just get used to random gunfire happening all the time.

    6. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the too-obvious-for-you-to-see solution to this is a) schools work with employers, especially ones filling apprentice type jobs with on-the-job training (i.e. not the stereotypical fast food or retail jobs) -- employers with legit advancement and career opportunities for those who start at the 'bottom', and b) 'employment offer contingent upon graduating high school' (and staying out of 'trouble').

      the less-obvious requirement a curriculum requirement like this needs is lower-cost, ideally fully and publicly funded, jobs training tech schools and 2 year community colleges. i.e. two year training or community colleges becomes a right, for those academically qualified, not a privilege for those who can afford it.

    7. Re:Means well, but... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      schools work with employers, especially ones filling apprentice type jobs with on-the-job training

      Oh you mean unpaid internships? Yeah sure, if you're going to give me some slaves for 6 months or a year I'm sure I can find work for them. Do you think employers will "work with schools" out of the kindness of their hearts? Where's the profit in that? There are hundreds if not thousands of candidates for any job opening. It's not hard for an employer to find employees. Why should I even take the time to set up some sort of "program"? Unless of course, you're going to promise me suckers who are told that their "experience" is their salary.

      Amazing how the US is behind absolutely everyone else in terms of laws that actually protect workers.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /pol/ has nightly threads where everyone just listens to the Chicago police scanner all night long.

      Here's the current one.

    9. Re:Means well, but... by blindseer · · Score: 2

      No, a high school diploma is worthless. And I don't mean that people are looking for a college degree to get a job.

      I've found there are quite a number of means to prove your value to an employer. There's a lot of high school equivalency tests out there. Places offer what is essentially an IQ test for showing reading, 'riting, 'rithmatic to potential employers. A lot of these tests are "free" in that the state will pay for it for anyone that qualifies for welfare or unemployment insurance. There's the SAT and ACT for college entrance. Colleges don't care that you have a high school diploma, if you score well enough on an entrance test then you can get in. This is especially true if you've done some high school, even if you didn't graduate, give them a transcript showing decent grades in math, sciences, and such. The high school might withhold your diploma but I'm pretty sure they have to show you your grades.

      Colleges and employers know what high schools actually teach their students. A diploma from a shit school isn't worth the paper it's printed on. I'm pretty sure that the Chicago public school system is full of shit schools.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    10. Re:Means well, but... by Calydor · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about? It's a perfect plan!

      If you get a job you get a high school diploma.
      If you don't get a job you enter the High School Dropout statistic instead.

      This way statistics can more easily point to the fact that getting an education (which can be really expensive with student loans etc.) is the only way to get a job. Stay in school, kids!

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    11. Re:Means well, but... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      > How to make more burger flippers.

      Robots are getting passed over for diplomas now? Seriously, there aren't gonna *be* burger flipping jobs in the near future...

    12. Re:Means well, but... by dwillden · · Score: 2

      Great points, personally I'd bet that this rule results in the local community colleges see a jump in the number of HS Seniors who come in and pay their $25 enrollment fee, just so they can show that they have been accepted to a college. But who then don't actually enroll in any classes.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    13. Re: Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some kids will cheat on tests. That doesn't mean its not a useful tool.

    14. Re:Means well, but... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Plans can be somewhat small-scale. "I am going to college". Not sure where, not sure what I'll study, etc. Or possibly, "I'm going to get a job as a waiter." Something besides, "I'm going to spend a lot more time playing video games now that I don't have to go to school anymore."

    15. Re: Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it will be a return to the automat but this time with a robot sticking
      store-bought burgers into a microwave and placing it into the coin-operated cubbyhole.

      Whats old is new again!

    16. Re: Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how come they don't stick the retard in an out of the way broom closet office or something, where he can't do any real damage? Yes, he is likely the local government's special little snowflake, so they can't outright
      fire/impeach him, but why not try to contain this destructive force as much
      as possible?

    17. Re:Means well, but... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know who did gap year just did it with no plan and certainly no formal program, and they did the gap year precisely because they had no plan.

      It's called a deferment, that is the entire extent of the "gap year program", you ask for your admission to be deferred to the following year for whatever reason.

      --
      Ken
    18. Re:Means well, but... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Amazing how the US is behind absolutely everyone else in terms of laws that actually protect workers.

      Brush up on US employment law, it's become very, very hard for employers to offer unpaid internships anymore, no smart employer even considers such an option - the legal risk and penalties are too great under current employment law.

      --
      Ken
    19. Re:Means well, but... by kenh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the Chicago public school system is full of shit schools.

      You forget, before becoming President, Barrack Obama worked to improve the Chicago Public School System, along with his neighborhood domestic terrorist Bill Ayers - they should be palaces of higher learning!

      --
      Ken
    20. Re:Means well, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burger flipper here, pardon me for trying to keep my bank account in the black while I study construction.

  3. School sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck getting a diploma. I'll just smoke weed smoke in the face of the principal as I arrive in a t-shirt and shorts with sandals to the ceremony.

  4. Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems ass-backwards. Let's hold students back because we don't want to hold them back. Isn't the point to successfully get out of "school" (not drop out) as soon as possible? Won't this just lead to more dropouts?

    1. Re:Ass-backwards? by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The goal is to keep more cattle in the academia industrial complex because the massive debt they accumulate, and the years they waste not entering the workforce, help the corporate masters strengthen their grip.

    2. Re:Ass-backwards? by DogDude · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dude, this isn't Infowars. The whole "corporate masters" conspiracy thing doesn't go over real well here.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Ass-backwards? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Probably depends on a bunch of variables. Like how much value a diploma actually adds over a dropout for one. I'm revealing my privilege, but I have no idea whether these days graduating high school actually gets you any better job than not having one does.

      If out of a hundred students, ten more students drop out with this rule, but ten more have a next step lined up, that depends on the value of a diploma. If it's "nothing" then that's a great trade. If dropout is absolutely unemployable forever while a diploma is middle class, then that's an awful trade. Probably somewhere between.

    4. Re: Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you want to work minimum wage, you need a diploma. Almost any decent job will throw out any application which lacks a diploma, and many look at a GED with disdain.
      I had a buddy who dropped out of high school a year early and got a GED, he couldn't find work until after he got his Associate's degree a year later.

    5. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And these "cattle" end up knowing more than you and can hold a good job better than you, mister im-still-stuck-at-9.75-in-walmart.

    6. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which website are you reading? Slashdot has always and always will be full of conspiracy loons.

    7. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I for one welcome our new corporate overlords! -- Been a Meme since the 90's on slashdot bub.

      BTW, go look up a guy by the name of John Taylor Gatto; he's got a really heady 5hr long interview up on youtube, one of the best read people you'll ever find. The point of public schooling is to constrain creativity by prolonging childhood for as long as possible. Why do you need a 6 year masters degree to teach kindergarden? The only possible explanation is intentional indocrination by teachers unions looking to further enrich themselves at everyone elses expense. This entire article has the smell of a Rahm, the master of povery traps, having a tantrum over how badly his running of his city is going. Chicago's the only City in the US where population is dropping and people are trying to escape.

    8. Re:Ass-backwards? by Ogive17 · · Score: 0

      Most people don't pay anything for public K-12 education outside a registration fee and sometimes to play a sport or join a club.

      I'm not sure about the idea.. on the fence right now.. I'm 38 and still don't know what I want to do but I did go to university immediately after graduating high school.

      This plan will require many more guidance councilors to help kids know the options out there. If it gets more of them into trade schools, that's good. Severe shortage of young machinists right now.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    9. Re:Ass-backwards? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you.

    10. Re:Ass-backwards? by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately "they" in this "corporate masters" case are lots of different entities each with their plans and motivations. That is distinctly not a conspiracy.

      This is my take:

      If the Democrats were good people, they wouldnt have to pretend so hard to be good people, and thus wouldnt suggest such a stupid asinine thing as withholding someones diploma from them for obviously fucked up virtue-signaling reasons. This guys plan is actively harmful. He is punching the citizens while pretending that its a good thing.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Ass-backwards? by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most people don't pay anything for public K-12 education outside a registration fee and sometimes to play a sport or join a club.

      Yeah, its never been funded out of most peoples property taxes... oh wait... its almost entirely funded from most peoples property taxes.

      Local property tax rates are always highly dependent on the ratio of people to schools within the township or county.

      Now its time to shut the fuck up about shit you dont know anything about. K? TX.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    12. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a degree. I have as much debt as 1 year of employment. I am sure it will inflate to something like 3 years of employment adding in interest over the long haul.

      I get paid twice as much as I did before I had the degree. I should move to another company and position this year and get a 50% pay raise due to the transition to a more business/leadership focused role.

      So let's see here. Let's normalize this thing.

      Per HS diploma employment year I would normally have, I will make 3x as much. My debt is a 2x amount of my high school-only wage, which inflate to 6x over time due to interest.

      Let's say I would just put 20 years in at each wage, and I don't factor in wage growth. 20 years at 1x = 20. 20 years at 3x = 60 - 6 = 54.

      So for every 20 high school-level wage years, I could have 54 for getting my degree. What a terrible deal for me right?!

      If you then chose to factor in wage growth over time for each scenario, that makes it even more lucrative for me. But please do stay out of school, you really lucked out avoiding that huge burden of debt you can pay off if you don't get a degree in art history.

      Relevant captcha: retail

    13. Re:Ass-backwards? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      BTW, he's full of crap.

    14. Re:Ass-backwards? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      BTW, go look up a guy by the name of John Taylor Gatto; he's got a really heady 5hr long interview up on youtube, one of the best read people you'll ever find.

      You are not allowed to cite John Taylor Gatto. Why not? Because he says in so many words that "citations are a game that academics play". That's what you get (from his assistant) when you ask him for some citations so that you can cite what he says with a clear conscience. Well, that means that citing his shit-show is invalid. Sorry-not-sorry. You clearly didn't check up on your citation there, because it's not peer reviewed. It's anti-peer review.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Ass-backwards? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      as much as I dislike corporate conspiracy loonies, in this case he does have a point: 1) you either have to enroll into a "gap program" which I guess is more counseling or some shit like that or work practice for free etc bullshit, 2) enroll in the military. 3) get a job 4) get admitted to an university(not entirely sure if you have to pay for it as well).

      like it is not that far off from starting to have mandatory work practice in walmart and mcd (or just straight up pay mit for extra courses) in order to graduate.

      look.. it all just sounds stupid. you fucking need to have graduated your high school to get a good shot at any of them! and I really can see some guy thinking they should "steer" people into these options, without thinking that people might have to, you know, graduated high school and seen their diploma/grades before getting on with it.

      HOW THE FUCK DO YOU GET ADMITTED TO UNIVERSITY WITHOUT GRADUATING HIGH SCHOOL ANYWAYS!?!? seriously, throw me a bone here. with 30 000 of cash? yes I realize that you can apply probably during the last spring of your high school, but that's with the expectation that you graduate and your final grades(in my country anyways) that are in the paper you graduate with affect admittance...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-peer review, boy that's a mouthful, but I like it and now have to go check it out. In other words, he's advocating for you to think for yourself? Great, because if you listen to Rahm Emmanual, then don't be surprised if another Chicago Independence day shooting record is broken next year. Obviously, his policies and ideals DON'T work! But what do I know, except for, well FACTS....

    17. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you're a teacher and probably in Illinois too.

      This is a state with declining tax revenue's due to a fleeing population, a junk credit rating, that can't run its own lottery. Heck, they sold their tollway system to the Canadians as an investment for the Canadians to, get this, pay their own pensions. That last bit means they have no assets to sell. Desperation has a smell to it; manditory 401k contributions and forcing kids into the labor force via these shenanigans or into more academics sounds an awful lot like desperation. "Either you're gonna use it now or we !@$!@#uck you."

      Decision pretty soon is going to be between cutting pay, benefits, tax exemptions, and pensions for government employee's, or shutting down government services. Since the teachers unions are all screaming "obligations obligations obligations" like a bad re-telling of Animal Farm, I can only see them making a fool of themselves, and their college degree's becoming a stigma that relegates them to Burger Flipping jobs becuase hey, who wants to hire a con artist?

      I really do hope the government employee's help themselves to a great big serving of humble pie. All those angry kids thinking they've been bilked by their government servants out of any kind of reasonable future, sold up the road, figuring out they have absolutely nothing to lose. My, we've already seen them rob malls and convenience stores en masse because hey, no future, might as well steal an X-Box and some games. Right? What ever will they do. I guess it really sucks most munincipalities require government servants to live within the munincipality they work in, eh?

      Really a sad state of affairs you have to worry about that.

      I'd say a lot more REALLY mean and not-so-nice things, but I realize it's late, and my vitrol is leaking all over the internet.

    18. Re:Ass-backwards? by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

      If the Democrats were good people, they wouldnt have to pretend so hard to be good people, and thus wouldnt suggest such a stupid asinine thing as withholding someones diploma from them for obviously fucked up virtue-signaling reasons. This guys plan is actively harmful. He is punching the citizens while pretending that its a good thing.

      Students: "Your 'schools' are educationally-meaningless daycare and indoctrination centers filled with chaos, political-correctness, and violence, we don't care whether we 'graduate' from such shitholes."

      Rahm Emanual: "You're making us look bad! Beatings will continue until morale improves!"

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    19. Re:Ass-backwards? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      And these "cattle" end up knowing more than you and can hold a good job better than you, mister im-still-stuck-at-9.75-in-walmart.

      I don't work at WalMart. I also don't make that little.

    20. Re:Ass-backwards? by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      That is distinctly not a conspiracy.

      You're right. It's not. But it's a bad thing nonetheless.

    21. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, was slavery in America a conspiracy? Conspire means to join or act together (not always in secret...) I'd and any other thinking person would say yes! What about serfdom, was it a conspiracy? Most certainly! Hence, so is corporate propaganda and promotion DISTINCTLY a conspiracy... unfortunately it's that there are a lot of different entities that makes it such, for you can't conspire by yourself!

      Some of you reading this are going to have a "son of a..." moment when you consider just how many meetings are held among companies with or without politicians every year, just in this country, never mind globally. Work for yourself, it is actually NOT selfish, because you have a immediate vested interest in your local community, unlike say, Google, Facebook, and several other companies that told Ireland they'd move if they had to pay their fair share of taxes. Ireland should have called their bluff, and neccesity being the mother of invention the job market their would have recovered.

      Now as for your take, on it's face it is true. But that's just the surface, yes Democrats are largely mask wearing pretending hypocrits virtue signaling for selfish reasons on an individual voter level. They have to be given something to vote for...

      lol something to these captchas, mine was swamped!

    22. Re:Ass-backwards? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible plan. Fortunately it's probably not true either.

      First, TFA is just a shell that is repeating the original WaPo source with a right-wing spin on it. I suggest reading that link instead.

      Second, all it appears to be is that they need a "plan". No requirements for what that plan will be, how realistic it is etc. So to get out of it, just write "I'm going to become an astronaut" on the form and you are good to graduate. Really, the bar seems to be so incredibly low that the only rational conclusion is that it isn't a bar at all, at least not for the students, it's just to make the schools dedicate some resources to helping the students decide what to do.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Quality education at kindergarten helps you develop better than at any other stage.

      2) Best teaching is found in countries where teachers are best qualified.

      3) You're a useful idiot, supporting the very people that are abusing you.

    24. Re:Ass-backwards? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      In other words, he's advocating for you to think for yourself?

      No, he's advocating for you to ignore the entire wealth of human knowledge and history.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left school at 15 with one 'O' level (I'm from the UK) I'm 57 now and make over 150, 000 UK pounds a year (after tax) I didn't go into further ediucation and didn't go into University as I thought school was boring and a waste of time. So how te hell do I make such good money ?

      By 17 I was running my own business. I'm self taught in quite a number of disciplines and will keep learning until the day I die.

      Anyone going into the education industrial complex is a complete fool. They'll end up with massive debt, outdated or only academically useful skills, no work ethic and no common sense.

      If you want to get ahead start your own business, teach yourself and put in the effort. The lucky kids today have got unlimited amounts of information available by the internet ! We used to have to go to libraries or ask about in the pub until we found someone who was prepared to give you enough pointers so you could work out what you had to teach yourself.

      Modern education *is* simply a very expensive kindergarten which teaches you to do what you're told and work for someone else's benefit.

    26. Re:Ass-backwards? by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Right... so I suppose the folks who run the school are being bribed by... someone?

      Or, you know, maybe you're just spouting conspiratorial nonsense.

    27. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all a simulation so it's worthless. The only things that matter are individual perception and having as much fun as possible.

    28. Re:Ass-backwards? by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2

      declining tax revenue's
      manditory 401k contributions
      government employee's
      college degree's
      government employee's
      live within the munincipality

      I'm sorry to see the education system has failed you, but if you can't get simple spelling and punctuation right do you expect people to take your analysis of a complex issue seriously?

      --

      Enigma

    29. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the perfect catch-22. Show us your plan and assignment to graduate. Show us your graduation to get an assignment.

      It's the natural progression of holding kids back and then blaming them, even though their generation outperforms every previous generation and then some.

    30. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA is just a shell that is repeating the original WaPo source [washingtonpost.com] with a right-wing spin on it.

      Right-wing spin? The article stripped out some details from WaPo, but the blurbs that remain are taken almost word for word.

      One part they took out was an interview with a student. That is more left-wing spin (focusing on one individual case instead of whether the policy is good for the whole) and isn't necessary to convey information about the proposed change to the system.

      Another detail is that instead of saying "Experts" say such and such, they just simply state the such and such. That's not so much a right wing spin as it is a lack of left-wing spin See, whether it's an expert saying it or not, doesn't change whether the such and such after it is true. Appealing to experts is a very typical left-wing spin, such that if anybody questions their claims, the left can be all "oh so you don't agree the experts you stupid science denier"

      And they did link back to WaPo if people want to read the whole thing. It's not like they're hiding what was left out.

      This is one reason the left is getting beaten so badly, and the mob is cheering for it. People like you insist that any source that isn't directly coming from the left's approved sources has a right wing spin, or is somehow sexist/racist/homophobic, or is fake news. This is gaslighting, and the people don't appreciate it, so even when some crazy 70 old grandpa goes off the rails on twitter like the recent CNN getting beat up by Trump thing, the public have little sympathy for you while the usual politicians pretend to be outraged to score political points.

    31. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just embarrassing. Those are like second grade level mistakes.

    32. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm revealing my privilege, but I have no idea whether these days graduating high school actually gets you any better job than not having one does.

      Not really. Any W2 job that actually pays a live-able wage requires at least a 4-year degree (with very, very few exceptions). The $8-$10/hr jobs that are left don't care if you've got a diploma, GED, or two year degree. Of course you can do very well for yourself without the degree in the trades and/or by opening your own business, but you'll have to learn about handling your own taxes and insurances instead of relying on your employer for that.

      I don't think this makes a big difference either way. It's basically just adding one more minor paperwork hurdle to graduation. "Secured a job" can be very easy to show if they're accepting self-employment. The college requirement is an acceptance letter, which any decent college-bound candidate should have at least one of (and it's not enrollment or commitment to attend, only showing you could). The ones who are going to graduate aren't suddenly going to stop because of one extra requirement. The ones who failed this requirement also probably failed some other, or were probably just drop-out bound either way.

      Really, you have two types of people in high school. Those who want to be there to succeed, and those who are just forced to be there. All this does is thicken the line between the two, it doesn't shift members of one group to the other.

    33. Re:Ass-backwards? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Really? I pay a 1.1% property tax, that money is factored into my mortgage. I didn't purchase a property that would have payments more than I could afford.

      I could have been more clear and said most students pay almost nothing for K-12 education. That was in response to the GP talking about students amassing huge debt going to school, which is not the case until post-secondary degrees are sought.

      I'm sorry you couldn't comprehend that and that you're some bitter hermit that lashes out at others. So how about you take your right hand, reach around to your bum, and yank that stick out.
      K thx bye.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    34. Re: Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some schools in Indiana also make parents rent textbooks and pay activity fees. The school systems which force this say that the state cut funding. I thinj, in some cases, the teachers are only worried about their starting levels and pay raises and don't give a darn about the kids. My daughter would come home and mention a teacher handed out photocopies of materials and just sat there on her phone (not actually teach). I hate that--show some pride and do your damn job, teachers!

    35. Re: Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn fat fingers... (Typographical errors in my post.)

      Apologies to all.

    36. Re:Ass-backwards? by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Just say you plan to graduate and then protest for liberal causes. You might graduate with honors.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    37. Re: Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly everyone I know, including myself, was accepted into college long before HS graduation. Dont be obtuse. This shit is dumb enough on its own.

    38. Re:Ass-backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goal is to keep more cattle in the academia industrial complex because the massive debt they accumulate, and the years they waste not entering the workforce, help the corporate masters strengthen their grip.

      Strengthen with what exactly? Young adults with zero work experience saddled with decades of crippling debt? What the fuck do the corporate masters intend to get out of that shit? Even if prostitution were legal, the obesity epidemic hasn't exactly make the average person desirable enough to generate a profit.

      Talk about worthless fodder to bolster a pointless goal.

    39. Re:Ass-backwards? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You give them debt, age, and desperation.
      Then they'll beg to work for minimum wage, part time, with no benefits. Hell, some of them will fight to the death for an unpaid internship.

    40. Re:Ass-backwards? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Good people can make bad decisions, particularly in some sort of bureaucracy or other organization. This looks like a bad idea to me, but there's at least a germ of a good idea in there.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    41. Re:Ass-backwards? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I assume that an acceptance conditional on getting the high school diploma would work to get the diploma issued. Where I live, you generally apply to colleges (if you're going to) in your senior year of high school, so you can start college in the same year you finish high school, and so colleges don't need your last semester's grades and will issue conditional acceptances. This isn't a problem here.

      I don't know about Chicago apprenticeship programs, but I doubt all that many students go directly into one of those, and they may want the diploma first. Getting a job is going to be easier with a diploma. Getting a job when the employers think you're going to quit immediately after getting the diploma is going to be harder. I don't know what the Armed Forces are looking for nowadays, or what a "gap year" is.

      It's still a stupid idea, just not quite as stupid as you said.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    42. Re:Ass-backwards? by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      You need to do more research into why the world is so fucked up DD. There ARE way-too-powerful people out there who want us, and our children, enslaved to their desires whether by soft or hard mechanisms.
        "The love of money is the root of all evil."

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  5. Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its funny how the detractors of this scheme have identified that there will be problems, the thing about having a process is that you can identify the problems and address them appropriately, which will be substantially better than the status quo.

    1. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the thing about having a process is that you can identify the problems and address them appropriately which will be substantially better than the status quo.

      Spoken like a middle manager.

    2. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of like illegal immigration: pretend there is no way to fix the problem, so don't even bother trying.

    3. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is people wanting to impose their processes on everything without figuring out the problems in advance. It makes the world fat, slow and bureaucratic.

      Anyone who has had experience with government bureaucracies knows that process gets put in place, causes horrible problems and most of those problems are never addressed. Why? The people who impose the processes don't give a shit about the problems they are causing. The imposers are on a crusade and only care about the kudos they will receive for the good things their process does. The bad things get covered up or ignored. The people dealing with the problems have to expend extra effort to comply with the process and work around the problems. Over time this compounds until it's hard to get anything done.

      What are the post-graduation plans of Chicago high school students? None of Rahm Emanual's fucking business.

    4. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you are saying is:

      Lets create a bunch of problems. Then we get to solve those problems.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Its funny how the detractors by mOzone · · Score: 1

      the thing about having a process is that you can identify the problems and address them appropriately

      Cuz you know Chicago is full of great ideas and process's .. like murder rate -- drop out rate -- rape rates -- teamsters controlling half the city -- police force that doesn't show up unless bodily harm -- mass job loss -- leading all city's in most people shot in the ass for 2017 -- aaah yes they see the error and change course lol

    6. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well ya, it's the thinking that comes from entrepreneurs: come up with a good idea then get other people to make it a reality. So here it's coming up with a process and then letting others figure out how to make the stupid idea work.

    7. Re: Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the most part this is all of humanity. You make problems for other people to solve and get to money grubbing while they're off trying to fix it. When they fail you can point them out as failures, grab your golden parachute and sail off to the next gig with your "credentials".

      This is how corporate bureaucracy works. This is why your manager complains how he did 10x the work you do while not realizing he's the one that crippled the system with review processes.

      It's the same way elections work. Get everyone talking about bathrooms and transgender rights and transgendered-bathroom-rights while you build your nuclear bunker.

      These might be honest mistakes, deliberate distractions, who knows... When you can't play the game you change the rules of the game. When you really can't play the game you start stealing candy from kids, or stealing diplomas.

    8. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the post-graduation plans of Chicago high school students? None of Rahm Emanual's fucking business.

      Oh but he's making it his business because he thinks it's a good idea and he has the power to make it so. He doesn't want to hear about the consequences of making these poor students jump through more bureaucratic hoops because the idea makes him feel good about himself. That in a nutshell is the template for a Progressive with an idea who has access to the levers of government power.

    9. Re:Its funny how the detractors by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If the process has serious problems (and I'm convinced it will), and they perform a bureaucratic and political miracle and fix them in a year, that's one year of students that get screwed. I'd expect more.

      I'm also not convinced it will wind up being substantially better for the students. Most will want to do something after high school, like college or getting a job or something like that, so it seems to me more of an impediment than an incentive.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:Its funny how the detractors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ya, it's the thinking that comes from entrepreneurs: come up with a good idea then get other people to make it a reality. So here it's coming up with a process and then letting others figure out how to make the stupid idea work.

      Most stupid ideas, including this one, deserve to be led on and then shot in the back of the head before any taxes can be levied without taxpayers' consent.

  6. I plan to be a gangsta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's if I don't become a rapper or basketball player.

    Word to ya mother.

  7. This is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strip the diplomas from "those" people. This will work wonders at reducing rape on college campuses!

  8. Thanks Nanny State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes a village.

    Thank the lord Slashdot posts this great stuff to the front page!

  9. Well, gee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not the move of a fascistic authoritarian *at all*...

  10. Excellent by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really an excellent thing to do. If they have the resources in counselors to handle it, it's really a great idea, and it could be a real help to the US education system at large. So many of the country's political, social, environmental, and economic problems come from people not thinking ahead. I'd love to see this go into place. I think this would help knock some sense into a lot of people who've never stopped to think for a few minutes about the future. I think something this simple could really nudge a generation of kids into some basic thoughtfulness.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an ideal world yes. In reality it probably just creates a market for employment letters.

    2. Re:Excellent by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      will just funnel more kids into becoming college dropouts

    3. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a good idea, and it's not the first one that Chicago has had. Their rate of school improvement has been outpacing the rest of the nation over the past decade or so. Especially high school graduation rates. One big thing they have done is to embrace a University of Chicago project that aims to rate schools based upon how empowered the various stakeholders in that school (teachers, parents and students) are to effect positive change in that school. Another really big thing they did was to abandon any hope of regulating teachers and instead focus on recruiting and hiring great people to run the schools, then giving them the training and support that they need. And holding them accountable for their school and their teachers.

      So obviously, I live in Chicago and have school-aged kids. It has now gotten to the point where principals have a somewhat celebrity status in the parenting circles. If a "good one" gets moved from school A to school B, people know about it and house prices around school B instantly start to rise. And of course there is the debate on whether the new hire at school A is capable of filling the role. It is fairly surreal. Then again, just about everything in Chicago and Illinois is surreal these days.

      Now as for Karen Lewis and the critics... Well, you'll notice that they didn't say that the schools "can't" provide the support, only that they "may not be able to" provide the support. The thing is, the public position of these people is maybe 5% based on the plan they are talking about, and 95% negotiation on some unrelated thing that has yet to be released to the public. They have left themselves plenty of room to support or reject the plan in the future based upon "having their concerns addressed".

    4. Re:Excellent by somenickname · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is really an excellent thing to do. If they have the resources in counselors to handle it, it's really a great idea,

      Well, it should be fairly easy to gauge whether or not they have enough counselors to handle it. Just watch the stats on high school graduation rate. My guess is that, in a place like Chicago, they are just about to plummet. It's kind of shocking to think that they are going to gamble the future of a generation of children based on whether or not they have enough competent councilors. But, sure, if they do have enough, it'll be glorious!

    5. Re:Excellent by MtHuurne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having kids think about the future is a good idea. Making it a requirement for graduation is not, in my opinion.

      Graduation is supposed to mark that the student has sufficiently mastered what they were supposed to learn. Maybe you could argue that "thinking about the future" is a skill that schools should be teaching, but then the way to test that would be to for example let them write an essay about it, not to require letters of acceptance.

      What rubs me in the wrong way is that the school would have criteria for what are considered acceptable plans for the future. They would not only be judging whether the student has thought about the future, but also the decision itself.

    6. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on - do you really think they're going to not graduate seniors that don't have a plan? People here are being ridiculous attacking a 2-line summary of a policy statement.

      Right now, the school has no easy way to identify students who are struggling to come up with a post-high school plan, as there's no official way to track what students are doing going forward. Making this policy makes it very easy - if you're going to college / trade school / whatever, you provide that info in 30 seconds and know they don't have to worry about you. If you don't have a plan, then they can force you to at least meet with a guidance counselor a couple times and get you onto the right path. If it's not an official policy, kids won't bother doing it, and you need 90%+ response rates in order to get the #s down to a manageable point that you can track individual students who are currently lacking a plan.

      This 'assume people in charge are all functionally retarded, whereas I as a random person on the internet who read a three sentence summary of a plan am very smart and can attack it' attitude is silly.

    7. Re:Excellent by fermion · · Score: 2
      It is worthless. Anyone can register for community college. You can probably pay on a plan where you pay 10%, get a note, and graduate, and then drop all the courses. That would likely be under $100, and that is if you don't get financial aid or a loan. Every public school I knows makes everyone fill ou a FASFA. Now the kid has $500 of debt they can't get rid of without paying, acruiing at high interest rates.

      Enlistment in the military is the simplest option. Send a certified retraction letter so it arrives before your DEP. if enough kids do this the military will be pissed off enough to either get the policy stopped, stop recruited students from Chicago schools, or reverse the policy of not bringing up AWOL recruits to a court martial. In all cases a huge amount of time will be wasted, though not taxpayer money because we have to pay recruiters anyway.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only college dropouts, but up to their eyeballs in debt!

    9. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a horrible idea and you can only see that if you're thinking ahead, so I'll agree with you that too many people can't think! Have a semi-wealthy family whose kids want to spend a year traveling abroad? Well, no high school degree for you. Parents are sick and you'll be taking care of them while they receive disability checks or are on sick leave? No degree for you. Getting married? Sorry, that's not a job nor further education. Born at the right time of the year or smart enough to skip a year thus graduating before 18? Limited job options, not even taking into account increased automation, more retirees entering the workforce, and all the other students fighting for the same jobs. No high school diploma means no HR rep will ever call you back even if there are openings. Forget about ever getting a non-minimum wage job unless you had the grades and $$ to get into college. Even community colleges have standards.

      A 'life skills' class would be far, far more useful. Basic accounting, doing taxes, self-management skills, speaking and listening skills, basic household repairs, etc...

    10. Re:Excellent by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      How this will probably get implemented is that the students have to write an essay about their future plans. Anything that is written legibly and doesn't say "I wan b a dope dilla" will get a passing grade.

    11. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you really think they're going to not graduate seniors that don't have a plan?

      Well that's literally the main thrust of the plan according to the summary, the linked article, and the other article the linked article was based on, so...yes?

    12. Re:Excellent by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      Just pointing out that planning to be a drug dealer meets the criterion for having a future plan.

    13. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pointing out that planning to be a drug dealer meets the criterion for having a future plan.

      Having a future plan is not the same thing as having a plan with a future.

    14. Re:Excellent by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      This is really an excellent thing to do.

      No it's not. It forced people to make rash decisions to get a diploma which can lock them into something they don't want to do.

      I didn't know what to do highschool, so I defaulted to the "I have no fucking idea" degree and did business management. It wasn't until I was in my mid 20s that I realised engineering is tickles my fancy.

      Yay wasted degree, more education debt, and all those other good things.

    15. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nudge a generation of kids into some basic thoughtfulness.

      I can see how you've fallen into this thought trap, most of the people here find that approach valuable, my self included. The reality is that once you have reached this age, your brain has developed the machinery to work a certain way, for some people its slow but considered decisions, and for other people it is quick and more relevant to the immediate situation. If you really wanted more people to be slow and considered this is too little too late.

    16. Re:Excellent by swb · · Score: 2

      And it would actually be a legitimate entrepreneurial path in Colorado and several other states, perhaps even Illinois some day.

    17. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it should be fairly easy to gauge whether or not they have enough counselors to handle it. Just watch the stats on high school graduation rate. My guess is that, in a place like Chicago, they are just about to plummet. It's kind of shocking to think that they are going to gamble the future of a generation of children based on whether or not they have enough competent councilors. But, sure, if they do have enough, it'll be glorious!

      So you like the status quo? Its not good enough to hand a kid a diploma and let him walk out the door these days. That does not help success. If a kid is not capable of coming up with a plan, then he or she is destined for trouble and needs help. This is a way to help those kids before they are released to the cruel world.

      The flat out refusal by many folks to consider this is a great example of why we can't really move the ball forward. This is exactly the type of thing we should try at select schools and evaluate the impacts. It not only makes the kid think, but maybe engages their parents with some direction as well.

    18. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having kids think about the future is a good idea. Making it a requirement for graduation is not, in my opinion.

      Graduation is supposed to mark that the student has sufficiently mastered what they were supposed to learn. Maybe you could argue that "thinking about the future" is a skill that schools should be teaching, but then the way to test that would be to for example let them write an essay about it, not to require letters of acceptance.

      What rubs me in the wrong way is that the school would have criteria for what are considered acceptable plans for the future. They would not only be judging whether the student has thought about the future, but also the decision itself.

      Teachers already decide what is acceptable in every subject they teach, its part of their job. Its really not that hard to come up with a set of criteria that requires very little in terms of decision making, you have a plan or you don't, and if you don't you get help developing one.. There is all the incentive in the world to graduate every kid, not to hold anyone back, so I think your fears are completely unfounded.

      Then again, we should be afraid to try anything new.

    19. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How this will probably get implemented is that the students have to write an essay about their future plans. Anything that is written legibly and doesn't say "I wan b a dope dilla" will get a passing grade.

      But that's too hard, too much to ask. Some kids that refuse to do it, or can't do it, will be held back in life entirely because they don't have that diploma, and there is nothing they can do about it. Its completely unfair to expect a kid to have a plan or be able to articulate a plan. Diplomas shouldn't require something so difficult. Let kids learn that stuff later on their own.

    20. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fail was obviously due to bad grammar and spelling.

    21. Re:Excellent by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Every public school I knows makes everyone fill ou a FASFA. Now the kid has $500 of debt they can't get rid of without paying, acruiing at high interest rates.

      Being approved for a loan doesn't disburse it to a school nor even require you to take it.

    22. Re:Excellent by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's not even quite true. The brain continues in development from 18 to about 25 or so. A lot of the development centers on handling emotion correctly. This is why teenagers tend to make different decisions than adults - emotions takes over thought processes more easily because they tend to overwhelm (think Romeo and Juliet).

    23. Re:Excellent by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      This is really an excellent thing to do. If they have the resources in counselors to handle it, it's really a great idea, and it could be a real help to the US education system at large. So many of the country's political, social, environmental, and economic problems come from people not thinking ahead. I'd love to see this go into place. I think this would help knock some sense into a lot of people who've never stopped to think for a few minutes about the future. I think something this simple could really nudge a generation of kids into some basic thoughtfulness.

      I agree this is an interesting and well intentioned idea but this the wrong way to go about it. Yes, I completely agree that kids not having a clear idea of what to do after highschool is a big problem. So let's force them to come up with an idea in order to graduate? Yeah, that's not going to work... it's a top down solution to a bottom up problem. Why kids aren't *already* planning about life after highschool is the real problem. Kids not having plans after graduation is merely a symptom.

      Trying to litigate your way to improving social behavior just isn't very effective. Improving highschool education and improving parenting is the better (but much harder) route.

    24. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enlistment in the military is the simplest option.

      While their intimate familiarity with firearms is a plus, I'm guessing that submitting to authority will be an issue.

    25. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZT! Rejected. Next!

    26. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I told you that you won't get your next paycheck unless you can show me that you'll only spend it on things that I approve of? Do you like that? Does that feel right to you?

      That's what they're doing here. "Sure, you can have this diploma, as long as you're going to do things with it that we approve of."

    27. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's less for the kids, and more for the educational institutions themselves.
      So they can tout that they're "doing something more" than other states.

      Chicago has a problem, and this is a launch-ramp to change that. The ramp's trajectory may be off, and it's plastered over with stickers of corporate, local gov, and state tax logos... but the ramp is there for photo ops and press conferences. And that first step is what's important.

    28. Re:Excellent by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      What rubs me in the wrong way is that the school would have criteria for what are considered acceptable plans for the future. They would not only be judging whether the student has thought about the future, but also the decision itself.

      That's really scary. Where we have historically seen fuzzy criteria like this in places like crime sentencing, prosecutorial discretion, and voting literacy requirements, they have almost always resulted in higher standards being applied to minorities (particularly African Americans).

      Lest you think your skin color makes you immune to this problem, this is just the fairly easily quantifiable effect. Black Americans are the canary in the coalmine for locating an unfair subjective system. If you or your kid manages to get a bad rep, or has a weird hairstyle/color, or heaven forbid, actually ticks off the school administration, that could be you too.

    29. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Progressive counselors in charge of "approving" these plans will be very subjective on what they deem is "a plan with a future." Student A: I'm going to volunteer for the Bernie Sanders campaign then maybe go into politics - plan approved. Student B: I'm going to volunteer for the Ted Cruz campaign then maybe go into politics - plan rejected, try again.

    30. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would not only be judging whether the student has thought about the future, but also the decision itself.

      Agreed. I had a couple classes with a girl who had done a lot of thinking about the future. She wanted to go into porn, then move into directing and producing when she got too old to star. She knew it might take her a while to really establish herself in the industry, so she planned on stripping to pay the bills while she chased her dream of pornstardom.

      In the very conservative midwest town we were from, that probably would have been considered unacceptable. But you can't say she wasn't thinking about her future...

    31. Re:Excellent by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly not sure if you are being serious or snarky.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    32. Re:Excellent by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I kinda stumbled from high school into a mathematics degree, and it seemed that the choices were actuary and programmer. I took programmer, and it turned out to be one of the best decisions I ever drifted into.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  11. Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need diploma to get college acceptance.
    Need college acceptance to get diploma.
    Rinse.
    Repeat.

    1. Re:Vicious circle by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Need diploma to get college acceptance..

      Spoken like someone who never got a college acceptance. Most college applications are due well before the end of the last year of high school.

    2. Re:Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two university degrees.

      How the hell do your colleges know which students should be accepted if they haven't got their diploma yet?

    3. Re:Vicious circle by shellster_dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So every college student without a plan is going to go to their mailbox, pull out the latest "acceptance letter" from the nearest vampire college that takes anyone with a pulse, and submit it to get their diploma. Meanwhile, the idiots that wrote this law can do a press conference and talk about how he's thinking of the children.

    4. Re: Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a current high school student they give you acceptance conditional on you graduating. They may also give look at your transcripts as of finishing junior year or include in the offer a condition of graduating with a certain gpa.

      Most really selective schools are full before the end of senior year and have a wait list in case people don't make the required gpa or don't graduate.

    5. Re: Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They look at GPA, and lots of other criteria. A student does NOT need a diploma as a prerequisite to be accepted. That is total bullshit.

    6. Re:Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better: they're increasing measurably 'college-bound' students. Doesn't matter if they actually plan to go or if it's actually the right choice for them.

    7. Re:Vicious circle by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How the hell do your colleges know which students should be accepted if they haven't got their diploma yet?

      If it's a community college, they guarantee you entry with a high school diploma, if that. If it's a university, then entry is based upon the combination of your SAT or ACT score and your application letter. It has nothing to do with high school.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell do your colleges know which students should be accepted if they haven't got their diploma yet?

      Their first 3.5 years of high school performance?

    9. Re:Vicious circle by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Or they go to their local community college, pay the small Enrollment fee. And they are accepted to a college. Then once they graduate they do what ever they want. That community college will likely see the 'student' take a single class. But hey they were still accepted.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    10. Re:Vicious circle by rfunches · · Score: 1

      If it's a university, then entry is based upon the combination of your SAT or ACT score and your application letter. It has nothing to do with high school.

      Incorrect. Some schools stopped requiring standardized test scores (SAT/ACT) years ago for undergraduate admissions. And I don't know of a U.S. university that will admit an undergraduate student who doesn't have a high school diploma, GED, or proof of secondary education. Three examples, one private, two public (not including my alma mater, which also had the same requirements):

      Carnegie Mellon University

      University of Virginia

      University of Maryland/University College (UMUC) -- also doesn't require the SAT/ACT for "most" degree programs

    11. Re:Vicious circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or some will simply register a business so that they can hire themself ... and then close the business the day after graduation.

    12. Re:Vicious circle by kenh · · Score: 1

      Most college applications are due well before the end of the last year of high school.

      Applications are due around December/January, and acceptance letters (which seems to be what you are talking about) are contingent on your successful graduation from High School.

      --
      Ken
    13. Re:Vicious circle by tsqr · · Score: 1

      No kidding? You actually need to graduate high school to get into college? Color me shocked.

      The original poster posited a "vicious circle" in which you need to get college acceptance to get the HS diploma you need to get college acceptance. Since in the Chicago case you just have to demonstrate that you have a plan, I'm sure a conditional acceptance would fill the need.

    14. Re:Vicious circle by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      When I applied to college (back when Nixon was President), I got one acceptance letter conditional on my graduation from high school, and one without a condition (College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota). Of course, the U did know I'd been in high school.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  12. Corrupt Rahm is up to something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rahm Emanuel is probably on his last term because he covered up the police murder of 17 year old Laquan McDonald. He'd be impeached or recalled if a legal framework for that existed in Illinois.

    He is one the most corrupt politicians in the country and he barely pretends to give a fuck about regular people.

    This odd graduation requirement must be a way to force students to pay money to one of his rich buddies in order to graduate.

  13. What a complete load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The educational system should not withhold a diploma because a person is not sure what they are going to do next. The diploma represents the progress made so far, not how far a person is planning ahead. This is sending a horrible message. The nanny state must be stopped.

  14. This is fucking stupid by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It took me a couple years after high school to figure out what I wanted to do. Started out EE, then computer science, finally got a degree in Math.

    If, at 18, I'd had to lay out my future plans they would have been somewhere along the lines of "smoke a lot of dope. Get laid. Find money to pay for weed and women".

    1. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It took me a couple years after high school to figure out what I wanted to do. Started out EE, then computer science, finally got a degree in Math.

      Did you do all of that in a place called "college"? Because that's ok, according to this plan.

    2. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is moronically shortsighted and obviously not thought out. This is kind of like the TSA. Lets do something that looks good even if it accomplishes nothing so we can say that we did something with our time as bureaucrats.

      Problem 1. I barely knew what I wanted to do half way through university. Now you will get the poor saps that don't have strong personalities committing to some crap they don't really want or maybe even understand and then feeling they need to follow through with it. They then end up in a place they hate.

      Problem 2. If they are Alphas then they will just make some crap up. I have it all mapped out. I will backpack through Somalia handing out medical supplies and then will be applying to MIT, Harvard, and Miami Dade College as a backup. In other words, say whatever.

    3. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And yet, you went to college and probably have a stable job or are in graduate school. RTFA, they aren't asking for a detailed plan of everything you will do with your life, just if you've got one next step in the bag--i.e. college acceptance, trade school acceptance, etc. This is much better than sending kids home at age 18 with no job, no prospects, no college acceptance, nothing. If you had had that, you might still be smoking weed in the basement chasing women, but because you had a plan (i.e. college), you aren't.

    4. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If some kid says: "I plan to sell sea shells by the sea shore". Can they still say they don't have a "plan" and deny them their earned diploma?

    5. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me a couple years after high school to figure out what I wanted to do. Started out EE, then computer science, finally got a degree in Math.

      The education system in your country is nicely flexible. If I wanted to change the way like that I'd have had to apply for and get in to a different university, study maybe twice to quadruple amount of basic math courses which are not at all equivalent or interchangeable with those studied during a EE of CompEng degrees, which by the way have different basic math courses in some schools as well.
        The options don't seem so nice for the poor students that have no connections: gap year program equals minimum wage employment which becomes the career choice without the choice eventually. Or the military, which is service without much choice. To make things more equal, the US might as well organize a draft twice a year, like my country does, with the idea that nobody can pay their way from the service.

    6. Re:This is fucking stupid by antdude · · Score: 1

      For me, it was entomology and then I decided to go to CS.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    7. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is much better than sending kids home at age 18 with no job, no prospects, no college acceptance, nothing.

      So instead send them home without all that and even without a high school diploma?

    8. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... Squashing bugs either way. Good crossover.

    9. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      It doesn't say you have to do your plan, just that you have to have a plan. If in senior year of high school you thought you'd end up an EE and put that down as your plan, but then switched to CS and then math along the way, you met the requirements just fine.

      This is such a ridiculously low bar. Basically any answer besides your "smoke a lot of dope" joke gets a passing grade. It's little more than asking "what do you want to be when you grow up" (with the additional part being "and how do you think you're going to become that?"). You don't have to actually do that "when you grow up", just show that you have some idea for what you're going to do next. If the plans change along the way, no problem, just so long as you have somewhere or another in mind at the start.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    10. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't say you have to do your plan, just that you have to have a plan. If in senior year of high school you thought you'd end up an EE and put that down as your plan, but then switched to CS and then math along the way, you met the requirements just fine.

      You clearly didn't read the requirements. They most certainly would not meet any requirements following your advice. In fact you frame things around "their plan" which as written has nothing to do with the requirements.

      "Students will soon have to show that they've secured a job or received a letter of acceptance to college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military in order to graduate,"

      If you put down you thought you'd be an EE, but later decided you wanted to be a CS, as you state, then you will not graduate high school as nether stating your own plan nor executing your own plan will qualify you to receive a diploma.

      If you write down you plan to be an EE, then in order to graduate high school and gain a diploma, you must show evidence you are now hired as an EE, or accepted into a college as well!

      The student having a plan doesn't matter.
      The student executing their own plan doesn't matter.
      You following the plan dictated by this law is all that matters, no matter what the student wanted for their future.

      If the student wanted to be an EE, and changed their mind that they wanted to be a CS after, then without a job or the grades to be accepted into college, your plan means fuck all and doesn't count.

    11. Re:This is fucking stupid by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's like just an anecdote man.

      Unfortunately I have the same anecdote (get laid, business management, then engineering), and my partner has the same anecdote (biochemical scientists, now teacher, and now masters of maths), and her sister has the same anecdote (gap year, then marketing, then well she's not old enough to have made a decision yet).

      Eventually the anecdotes pile into data. A lot of people have no idea what they are doing well into their 20s. But I guess it's important that they keep paying university fees for something they won't finish or need.

    12. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      If the student's plan is "I'm going to be an EE, and here's the acceptance letter from the college I'm going to go to to do that", then they pass.

      After that, if they decide to do CS instead, that's fine. The diploma doesn't get retroactively withdrawn if you don't follow through with the plan.

      Can't get into a good school? Can't get a good job? That's fine: "I'm going to go to crappy local community college and try to transfer to a better school from there" is an acceptable plan too. CCC will accept anybody so anybody can say they're going to do that. "I'm going to flip burgers part time at the local burger shack who'll hire anyone until I can figure out what the fuck else to do for a living" is an acceptable plan too.

      You're going to do something after you graduate high school. This new law basically just adds a mandatory assignment to senior year: show us what you're going to do after you graduate. It can be basically anything. Go to any school. Get any job. They can be shitty ones if you can't find better ones. You're going to end up doing one of those things or another eventually (or you're going to starve to death in the street), so just pick one and you pass. And then you can change your mind later if you figure out that a better option than those is actually available.

      All this assignment does is force to you figure out which, of the options immediately available to you, is the best one you can actually start doing now, and then show that you're going to start doing that. After that you can change direction all you want, so no opportunity is lost. It just makes you think about your future, and that's not a bad thing.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    13. Re:This is fucking stupid by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Question: Is "I'm going to veg for a couple years on my very well to do daddy's dime then decide what I want to do with my life." an acceptable plan?

      What if said enabler of a father then provides a notarized letter that he is fully supportive of that plan?

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    14. Re:This is fucking stupid by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Aaaaand that's the difference. The summary mentions they need to have SECURED a job or gap year program or college or whatever.

      I would be in favour of having them to have a PLAN for the future, but requiring them to have signed contracts is ridiculous. And that plan, while it should have been seen and reviewed by a counselor, it should not be judged.

      It#s a good thing to force them to think about the future, but a diploma still is earned with their previous achievements, not the future.

      --
      bickerdyke
    15. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't say you have to do your plan, just that you have to have a plan.

      did you read the same article I did?

      "Students will soon have to show that they've secured a job or received a letter of acceptance to college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military in order to graduate,"

      Kind of sounds like they have to DO their plan to be able to graduate.

    16. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And WTF is a "gap year program"? What if they've banked enough cash to go hike around wherever for a year or so?

    17. Re:This is fucking stupid by aicrules · · Score: 1

      If you live in Illinois, they'll take good care of that banked cash real soon now.

    18. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Receiving an acceptance letter to start doing a program doesn't mean you have to follow through on the program.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    19. Re:This is fucking stupid by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain what a "gap year plan" is, but what you describe is what I picture when I hear that phrase, and it's included in their list of acceptable plans.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    20. Re:This is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like the thing you needed was exactly what this was proposing. Getting your shit together when you essentially should have instead of waiting 2 years to do it.

    21. Re:This is fucking stupid by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If, at 18, I'd had to lay out my future plans they would have been somewhere along the lines of "smoke a lot of dope. Get laid. Find money to pay for weed and women".

      Some of us didn't have the social skills to pull that off at 18. Other than that, it has its attractions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  15. where does this end by esarjeant · · Score: 2

    So will it be acceptable if your college of choice now requires that you secure a job or post-graduate program before you can graduate there too? Imagine the awkward conversations you could have with the hiring manager; "So do you have a college degree?"... "Um, sortof"

    Rather than a graduation requirement for high school, maybe high school seniors could use this kind of preparation to boost their grade. If you are able to secure work, vocational training or some other post-high school education then you are entitled to an additional 0.5 points added directly to your GPA.

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

    1. Re:where does this end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post reeks of privilege. This is aimed at kids that could care less if their GPA is 2.2 or 2.7.

    2. Re:where does this end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not arguing with the thrust of your argument here, but it might be pointed out that recruiters actually hire college seniors before they have finished, knowing that they will have a degree come May (or whatever). It's downright stupid to graduate and _then_ go looking for a job when most seniors have a job lined up by January (at least our students do--I'm a professor).

    3. Re:where does this end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And once a child gets into a post high school academic program, how then is an increase to their GPA helping them? I see this playing out in a multi stage college application process for anyone who actually cares about college...

      Stage 1: Apply to schools with earned GPA.
      Stage 2: Once accepted, show high school acceptance letter to get additional 0.5 GPA points.
      Stage 3: Reapply to better colleges with new, improved GPA.

      I like it. Make it so.

    4. Re:where does this end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privilege or not, they SHOULD be concerned. My son was rejected from MTSU this year because his GPA was a 2.4 and they required a 2.5. Tennessee is evidently having a high college enrollment rate due to the TN Lottery scholarships. The universities are getting picky.

    5. Re:where does this end by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      People get bread only for specific purposes in test tubes. We destroy our planet with global warming in the next 200 years. One dude has sex and his missus gives birth the conventional way. Just as the planet implodes he fires this abomination into another solar system where the baby grows up in a strange atmosphere with a strange sun.

      The baby destroys half a city while having a fight with batman and pretends to die while an irrelevant movie comes out without him.

    6. Re:where does this end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I was rejected from an Engineering position at Sandia National Labs because my undergraduate GPA was 3.4 and they required a 3.5. Never mind I graduated more than 20 years prior. Obviously I didn't plan well enough.

  16. I planned to be a coder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I planned to be a coder, so I studied AP calculus in high school and I spent all my free time at the library reading programming language reference manuals. Then I majored in computer science in college where I spent all my free time in the computer lab studying networking and writing socket programs. After graduation I went on to earn a masters degree in computer science and I contributed to open source projects. Have I ever found a job in the tech industry? Absolutely not! I only wasted my life studying tech for zero return on investment. Education is worthless. Future plans are for losers.

    1. Re:I planned to be a coder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Found the LUDDITE who didn't app apps!

      Only app coders code apps not LUDDITE sockets.

      Apps!

    2. Re:I planned to be a coder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But he did apply himself. Surely that was an appropriate action to take.

    3. Re:I planned to be a coder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure go ahead and apply yourself, if you want a wasted life.

  17. Bad. Bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LeRoy Brown.

    Dis ain't gonna fly none ifin you be from the South Side of Chicago.

    1. Re:Bad. Bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LeRoy Brown was from the south side of Chicago, true. Didn't the 'badest man in the whole damn town' wind up on his ass with a few pieces missing after messing with the wrong dude? It think you may have missed the moral behind the song's lyrics.

  18. Better goal by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Chicago would be better to put these resources towards making sure all of its children survive to graduation before spending more money the city doesn't have forcing them to make plans for what comes next.

  19. Not Consonant with a Free People by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those 18 year olds are free men and women. Neither Chicago, nor the State of Illinois, nor the Federal government own them. This proposal, however, presumes too much. One must have a diploma at minimum to participate in much of society. But now this paternalistic body speaks to these young men and women as if to say, "Before you can receive this academic certification, you must prove your willingness to offer years of your life to a corporate master (i.e. find an employer who will deign to accept you), a military hierarchy (with the concomitant possibility of losing your life), or to a bank (in the form of bankruptcy-proof student loans). The wealthy, of course, will be excepted by means of gap-year programs but you, peasant, you must swear fealty."

    I cannot deny the practical value of a proposal like this. It's certainly there. But I do deny the right of the state to gainsay an adults freedom to choose either to work or not work, to go to college or to spend a few years mooching off his willing parents, to take on debt or hang out in the basement writing or inventing or starting a business or playing video games.

    1. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, then that just might mean that we AREN'T a free people. Who knew?

      Also, it's pretty simple: secure a job at the local Burger Lord, get the pretty piece of paper that says you wasted 12 years of taxpayer money, and then quit a week later.

    2. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would be better if there was a policy (with funding) that required schools to provide sufficient guidance services to all graduates who request them to help them find that first job, apprenticeship program, or post-secondary institution that will take them. Guidance services that should probably start in their freshman high school year.

      "Do this difficult adult thing, kid, or we will hobble your future" is nasty. "Here, let me help you do this difficult thing because that piece of paper alone won't cut it" isn't.

    3. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One must have a diploma at minimum to participate in much of society.

      Last I knew the government is not the one enforcing that. If businesses want to require someone complete high school then that's their right.

      But now this paternalistic body speaks to these young men and women as if to say, "Before you can receive this academic certification, you must prove your willingness to offer years of your life to a corporate master (i.e. find an employer who will deign to accept you), a military hierarchy (with the concomitant possibility of losing your life), or to a bank (in the form of bankruptcy-proof student loans). The wealthy, of course, will be excepted by means of gap-year programs but you, peasant, you must swear fealty."

      Hyperbole aside, how is this any different from what it already does? "Before you can receive this academic certification, you must have proven your willingness to offer years of your life to an educational master (ie, the school system). The wealthy, of course, could be excepted by means of private tutors but you, peasant, you must have sworn loyalty."

      But I do deny the right of the state to gainsay an adults freedom to choose either to work or not work, to go to college or to spend a few years mooching off his willing parents, to take on debt or hang out in the basement writing or inventing or starting a business or playing video games.

      And they're free to do that. Without a diploma. But you better be ready to live with their decisions because, after all, they're adults now: once they turned 18 they suddenly transformed into intelligent, well-reasoned individuals that are totally capable of living their own lives without oversight or supervision.

    4. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      You like formality, don'tcha? Regardless, I think your point is moot as the plan doesn't seem to be at all what you're describing. The actual description sounds a lot more reasonable: you need to have something, anything more concrete than "I dunno, chill with my crew, I guess" lined up after graduation. That doesn't seem like a bad thing.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it stinks when people come us with requirements to get things. They should just hand out diplomas to anyone. No requirements.

    6. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a student is going to look for work after high school. . . they're usually looking *after* high school.

      Maybe taking the summer off, with their parent's okay.
      Maybe doing a little traveling or visiting friends before taking the plunge into the workforce, even if it is just a retail job.

      If they want something a bit better than retail, usually they have to have the diploma in hand, which they won't be given to go look for said better job until they have said better job. . .

    7. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea it is a bad thing. The high school diploma is nominally something earned for completing high school. Holding something earned hostage for something in the future is just wrong. How many college graduates don't have concrete plans when they graduate in May/June? My guess is a lot, should we hold their diploma's hostage as well?

    8. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 2

      You like formality, don'tcha?

      Nah. That's just the way I talk when something aggravates me. Remember, the root of the word 'expletive' is 'to fill out'. I just use different filler.

      That doesn't seem like a bad thing.

      Again, I don't deny that it makes some practical sense. It's when we get to the principles of the thing that I object. Let's consider this case as a thought experiment:

      An 18 year old girl is preparing to graduate from a Chicago school. She's a diligent, straight-A student. She has a 20 year old boyfriend who is gainfully employed by his family's construction company. The couple plan to wed upon her graduation and, due to her love of children and the influence of their Mormon faith, she would like nothing better than to start a family and avoid the workforce.

      Now, the couple in this example have a very clear notion of what they want to do with their lives. It happens this doesn't involve subordinating oneself to some state-approved entity or having money enough to take a one-year state-approved vacation. But it's meaningful to them. It's what they wish to do. Who are we to deny them this? Who are we to tell them what objects they really ought to pursue in life? Even if there's some practical value to the state, should there be no sphere in life where the state's interests are weighed little in comparison to the private values of individuals and families? For I can say this much with certainty: "I wish to stay home and raise children" will sound exactly like, "I dunno, chill with my crew, I guess" to any state-approved professional. It may even sound worse, because even wealthy kids are known to chill with their crews, but having children while still young sounds like just the kind of behavior the proles need to be weened of.

      One might well say that she can do all this and just not get the diploma if it's so important to her. This is true. But supposing he bites it in some construction accident three years hence? We've now handicapped her ability to go and earn what she can for her family, when she most needs it, and for what? She met all her academic requirements; she only failed to have goals the state recognized as worthy. (And I have, in fact, known intelligent, lower-middle class girls loosely fitting the above description.)

      One might disapprove of her goals, but this would be most telling of all. For this reveals just how much we think our neighbor's business is our own. Yeah, maybe she wants to have kids rather than work 40 hours a week at the behest of some supervisor, but that's the wrong thing to want. Maybe she thinks family is more worthwhile than getting a business degree, but she's wrong. If she won't choose the right things, perhaps she can be made to do so. It's for her own good.

      In short, by what principle do we presume to dictate to this girl that her choice of something, anything lined up after graduation is wrong?

    9. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      TL;DR tell me where you found the evidence that they wouldn't allow your stay-at-home mom example. I saw a non-detailed news story that listed examples of future plans (school, work, military, etc.) but nothing that claimed to be exhaustive.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    10. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those 18 year olds are free men and women.

      And they are free to live without their high school diploma.

    11. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Has there ever been a counselor at a school worth anything? No counselor in any school I ever went to seemed all that interested in my academic or, later, financial life. It was all about how gifted (but troubled) I was and how concerned they were about me. They never mentioned anything concrete, there were no actionable lines of wisdom or advice, it was all feel-good bullshit.

      These schools need men -- yes, men -- in guidance roles who will be frank, but supportive. "I don't like this D. Why do you have a D in this subject? ... Okay, so let's work on it then. I'll set you up with a tutor. Let's talk to your parents about a solution so you can do well and find something meaningful to do with your life." Maybe that's too nice. Tone can be changed, but the core message these kids need is "I'm going to watch how you do, and I want you to succeed. I want to see you walk to the stage in X years and see you graduate. I'm in if you're in."

      Schools don't have any of that. Nobody's willing to look at a kid and say, "This isn't acceptable," *AND* legitimately help them get better. There's too much focus on "sink or swim", when these kids need concrete, stern advice and a little motivation. Their brains are literally less-developed, and it's our job to make them better people.

    12. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      Agreed, not in my experience either. Mine was not just worthless, but detrimental. My sister's too. A few years later one Christmas I got to hear one of the neighbor moms complaining about her kid's counselor. Based on the bad behavior described I asked if it was the same one I had and sure enough it was.

    13. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by eddeye · · Score: 1

      But I do deny the right of the state to gainsay an adults freedom to choose either to work or not work, to go to college or to spend a few years mooching off his willing parents, to take on debt or hang out in the basement writing or inventing or starting a business or playing video games.

      That same state paid for the kids education. 12-13 years of public schools paid with state tax dollars to reach graduation. Requiring the kid to do something in return for that massive gift isn't unreasonable. Some schools require kids perform a certain number of hours of public service to graduate. Same basic principle.

      Now this idea stinks for many reasons. It's paternalistic, it's classist, it hurts the most disadvantaged. But the govt's right to do it isn't one them.

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
    14. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by blindseer · · Score: 1

      The wealthy, of course, will be excepted by means of gap-year programs but you, peasant, you must swear fealty.

      I'm pretty sure the wealthy will be exempt by the nature of going to a private school, not public school.

      Also, "have a plan" is pretty vague, especially if it allows for a gap year. Tell the counselor that you are going to work for your uncle in his corner store, even if there is no job. Or corner store. Or uncle. Does the mayor think that schools won't find an "out" on this to avoid raising dropout rates? I think that the high schools will start doing summer programs for those that don't have a "plan" where they sign up for it but the school doesn't actually care if the students show up for it. In fact I'm sure they prefer they are a no show, less work for them then. At that point the students have their diploma, no obligations to the school (they'd be legally adults by then), and the school gets to tick the box for "graduated" so their numbers look good.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    15. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      One might well say that she can do all this and just not get the diploma if it's so important to her.

      Anyone saying that would be a capital A asshole. A straight-A student has earned her graduation certificate. That her future plans didn't align with those encouraged by the state isn't relevant.

      (I know we agree .. just saying)

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    16. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      That same state paid for the kids education. 12-13 years of public schools paid with state tax dollars to reach graduation.

      No, the State did not pay for the kid's public education.

      Property taxes paid by local property owners, likely including that kid's parents, paid for his public schooling, possibly with additional funds from taxes and lottery programs at the State level, which also all come from the citizens/taxpayers. Government has no money of it's own, only what it takes from the population.

      So, Chicago wants to withhold an educational diploma that this kid of yours has already earned with his educational achievements, and that his parents and community already paid for.

      Sounds legit.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    17. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately I can't mod you to 6.

    18. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lay off the thesaurus already, dude.

    19. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by AmericaRunsOnDunkin · · Score: 1

      The govt is the people. Did you sleep through civics class?

      Those local tax payers who paid for the kids education elected those city officials. The officials represent those citizens and serve their needs. They are implementing this policy on behalf of those taxpayers. It is the taxpayers who implementing this requirement, via their duly elected officials.

      If it turns out the local tax payers don't like this policy, they can vote in new officials and overturn it. That's how govt works. The govt IS the people. What, you want every taxpayer showing up at graduation placing their own unique demand on every graduate because they paid for part of his education? It doesn't work that way dude. The taxpayers' collective rights to do this sort of thing are vested in their elected officials.

    20. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      The officials represent those citizens and serve their needs.

      In theory, yes. In practice, not so much, and as government size, scope, and power grows, it becomes even less until a tipping-point is reached, and then that is no longer even theoretically true.

      Also, locals only have so much choice how their education taxes are spent, as most things that truly matter are controlled by the Federal government. A county school system would not be allowed to determine the curricula taught outside a narrow range of choices, mostly in subjects not required for graduation.

      Of course, regardless of anything else that might be done to improve US public education or how much money is spent, it will all be wasted and for naught until the teacher's unions are banned and the Federal Dept. of Education is eliminated or at minimum seriously reduced in power & scope. (Public-sector unions are a criminal abomination and should be banned in any case.)

      "All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations..." -- FDR

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    21. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Requiring the kid to do something in return for that massive gift isn't unreasonable.

      You mean like paying for the next generation's education through taxes? That already happens.

    22. Re:Not Consonant with a Free People by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      she wants to have kids rather than work 40 hours a week at the behest of some supervisor

      In other words, she wants to work 60 hours a week at the behest of an inarticulate immature erratic supervisor. It has its attractions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  20. I find this horrifying by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and it's the kind of thing that makes me think there's something genuinely evil behind it. There's no benefit here. If a kid doesn't have problems in life they'll be college bound. But a kid who does just got a whole new set of problems to worry about. More friction at home. More fights.

    As for 'counselors' my kid just graduated. Her counselors were worse than useless. Overworked. Under trained and under resourced. They knew most of the kids were boned and made no secret of it. And this was in one of the best schools in the city. What I'm saying is any kid that doesn't have amazing parents (or at least rich ones) is screwed. Oh, and speaking of rich parents if you're the kind of rich brat that gets to travel for a year you can easily get exempted from this.

    My guess is this is the local businesses looking to get cheap labor from desperate kids who now must have a job to graduate. We'll probably see more 'internships' where you're working full time for little or no pay. I can't think of another reason to push something this awful and this obviously unpopular. If anyone else knows what evil thing is behind this let me know.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I find this horrifying by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's one of many baby steps towards neo-feudalism.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:I find this horrifying by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Look, as a community-college educator in a different part of the country (and who participates in academic conferences on this sort of thing): it's none of that. It's a desperate cry for help at the fact that most students sit glassy-eyed through the entirety of their K-12 and now community college years, having no idea why they should bother trying at any of it. No one fails classes anymore. Effectively no one fails to get a high school diploma. No one is denied placement at a community college ("open admissions"). And yet 80% of the people who get into community college are basically illiterate and innumerate, and can't pass even 6th-grade arithmetic or language tests. High school diplomas are pretty much worthless today. I have students who are sincerely astounded that the answer to "Is it possible to fail a class even when I have perfect attendance?" is "Yes".

      The people who lobby for this kind of thing want people to not starve to death because they can't support themselves. They want high school to mean something, so they go grasping for something like this. They want more people to graduate community college because that's correlated with higher income for those people (yes, there's a whole slew of criticisms to be made around that).

      You can legitimately think that this is a bad idea. I do. But the 5-score conspiracy theories about it here in this Slashdot thread are truly faked-Moon-landing, anti-vaxer quality.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:I find this horrifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...most students sit glassy-eyed through the entirety of their K-12 and now community college years, having no idea why they should bother trying at any of it.

      If they have no reason to care, you can't expect them to care, nor can you force them to care.

    4. Re:I find this horrifying by swb · · Score: 1

      Did "counselors" ever do anything? In the early 1980s they did nothing at my high school, which at the time was possibly the best in the city.

      I still remember meeting my counselor at one of the few mandatory meetings and walking away wondering what the guy got paid for. All he did was tell me I was taking the right classes for college and that I should apply.

    5. Re:I find this horrifying by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      and it's the kind of thing that makes me think there's something genuinely evil behind it.

      You'd be amazed at the amount of harm that can happen because of well-meaning people working with policies that were intended to help people out. That's why the policies need to be thrashed out well, and subject to more scrutiny than they usually get.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. Maybe living to graduation a plus by JohnScott1514 · · Score: 1

    How about this Mr. Mayor. Let's just get more to live to graduate and not drop out and join gangs you idiot. Understanding the problem is the first step to solving it Mr. Mayor

  22. Our high school guidance counselor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our high school
    guidance counselor...
    used to ask us what you would do
    if you had a million dollars...
    didn't have to work...
    and whatever you'd say
    was supposed to be your career.
    So if you wanted
    to fix old cars...
    then you're supposed
    to be an auto mechanic.
    So what did you say?
    I never had an answer.
    I guess that's why
    I'm working at Initech.
    No. You're working at Initech...
    'cause that question
    is bullshit to begin with.
    If everyone listened to her,
    there'd be no janitors...
    because no one would clean shit
    if they had a million dollars.
    You know what I would do
    if I had a million dollars?
    I would invest half of it
    in glorious mutual funds...
    and then take the other half
    to my friend Asadulah...
    who works in securities...
    Samir. Samir,
    you're missing the point.
    The point of the exercise is
    you're supposed to figure out...
    what you would want to do if...
    "PC load letter"?
    What the fuck does that mean?

  23. Conscription by dohzer · · Score: 1

    So this is basically conscription in disguise, right?

    1. Re: Conscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to need niggaz in uniforms in North Korea.

    2. Re: Conscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That practice was certainly honed to a fine art in Vietnam. -PCP

    3. Re:Conscription by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      If this was book or movie script about how a gov would do this?
      Feed the diploma mills offering loans for the students with academic skills. Take the loan for the freedom to select a course or the gov gets to decide on a job.
      A back door draft as a last resort to get the papers you qualified for released by the gov.
      That accredited trade apprenticeship or a gap year program won't be free so someone is making some money looking after the "students".

      Take a loan or accept a free gov grant?
      Go to war. Stop loss keeps that person stuck in that war for many years. Very few legal ways back home from endless wars.
      Or get a loan or have the wealth to pay for an approved apprenticeship?
      If the government pays for your apprenticeship does the government get your skills for a few years of work in their city? Some fine print about years of service back to the gov or city to help the USA for that "free" apprenticeship?
      Or find something the government accepts as been a gap year program?
      Just for a government to release school paperwork that been studied for in full?
      In debt for life or sent to some distant endless war or the risks of domestic duty?

      Be the first to try that government approved "program"?
      Have to sign up for the next year too or your papers are revoked.
      Been driven out to do hairdressing or digging ditches in some random "community" and been collected again late at night?
      A nice new gov loan for the shovel or a set of scissors. Wanted to learn to work with computers? Too late, should have joined the mil or taken a loan for that kind of academic request.
      The gov says poor people need care or the drains need cleaning. Thats freedom in a gov approved "program".
      Cant look after the gov issued shovel or scissors? A more sheltered workshop environment can be arranged for people who don't want to look after government property.
      Drop out or escape? Remember who did the cosigning.
      That family or kin gets that loan passed to them in full with extra payments due to the cost of trying to find the person.
      Sounds like some history text book about governments people have to escape from.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Conscription by uncle+slacky · · Score: 1

      Service Guarantees Citizenship! Would you like to know more?

      --
      Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it.
    5. Re:Conscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      came here to say this, I hate -or maybe love- you

  24. Great fscking idea by mysidia · · Score: 1

    "High school: To get your diploma, you have to show us your job offer first."

    "Prospective employer: Sorry, to apply for this job, you have to show us your diploma first."

    1. Re:Great fscking idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Prospective Employer: "Y'know, if you don't take this unpaid internship you won't graduate. Just saying."

    2. Re:Great fscking idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God the rahmifications of this are getting worse and worse.

    3. Re:Great fscking idea by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Prospective Employer: "You're going to work, sorta, up to the day you get your diploma, then you're going to never show up here again. Right?"

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  25. Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by TheCowSaysMoo · · Score: 1

    According to WaPo article: "High school graduates are guaranteed admission to one of the city’s community colleges, if they apply, and about 40percent of the Class of 2015 enrolled in a four-year college, approaching the national average (44 percent) that year."

    Want your diploma and don't have any real plans for the future? Just apply to one of the city's (soon-to-be-extremely-overcrowded) community colleges, get your acceptance letter, show your acceptance letter, get your diploma in May/June, then go do whatever you feel like doing and never show up for community college in August/September.

    Given how obvious the loophole is, it makes you wonder if increased community college applications is the real end goal they're wanting...

    1. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      According to WaPo article: "High school graduates are guaranteed admission to one of the city’s community colleges, if they apply, and about 40percent of the Class of 2015 enrolled in a four-year college, approaching the national average (44 percent) that year."

      Want your diploma and don't have any real plans for the future? Just apply to one of the city's (soon-to-be-extremely-overcrowded) community colleges, get your acceptance letter, show your acceptance letter, get your diploma in May/June, then go do whatever you feel like doing and never show up for community college in August/September.

      Given how obvious the loophole is, it makes you wonder if increased community college applications is the real end goal they're wanting...

      A diploma is more than a piece of paper. Most future employers, colleges, etc. don't care at all about the piece of paper. They want an official transcript from your high school showing you've graduated. Don't show up to the college you've said you're going to attend? The high school "cancels" your diploma and any future transcripts issued will show you have not graduated.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it's all part of a clever plan to make an Associate's degree the minimum. Just ask creimer; he has like three Associate's degrees, and he's a winner in life.

    3. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you not know how community colleges work? Because this is fundamentally how they already work everywhere. It's called open admissions.

    4. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy an Amazon Dot. In black, of course, to match my awesome Black MacBook.

    5. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by mentil · · Score: 1

      I doubt that. Considering how many people drop out of college after 1 semester, it's unlikely they'd revoke diplomas for all of those people; in practice, the diploma wouldn't be revoked, they'd just refuse to issue a transcript. Or what if you have a job lined up and it falls through/you get laid off/startup collapses etc.?
      That said, I've never been to a job interview or seen a job application where 'high school diploma transcript' was mentioned; graduation rates are high enough that you'll be taken at your word at any job willing to hire you.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    6. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A diploma is more than a piece of paper. Most future employers, colleges, etc. don't care at all about the piece of paper. They want an official transcript from your high school showing you've graduated.

      No employer gives a shit about your high school transcript. They just want you to check a box that says that you graduated high school because for one reason or another they have it as a requirement of employment. At that level all they really care is whether you have a pulse and whether they can look like they're doing their job. No employer I've had has ever asked for any proof of my educational history whatsoever.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Ridiculously Obvious Loophole by kenh · · Score: 1

      Most future employers, colleges, etc. don't care at all about the piece of paper.

      A high school education isn't about securing a piece of paper, anyone that thinks that has no understading of the world.

      They want an official transcript from your high school showing you've graduated.

      Colleges want "official Transcripts", employers want workers that can peform the job they are hiring for, and certainly have no interest in revieing your third year high school English grades or other such nonsense on your transcript.

      I've had several employers that require a background check (consulting firms that want to verify the resume they are presenting to a potential client, school districts) that includes a confirmation of my HS education, nothing more.

      --
      Ken
  26. Better yet - educate! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about just focusing on making sure they can read the newspaper, write at an equivalent level, perform basic math as needed to balance a checkbook, do basic geometry, learn about US history (at the very least - ideally world history as well), and have two years of science classes - biology, chemistry, physics? Oh - and can actually PASS the course without having "adjustments" made for life experiences. In essence - make sure they EARNED their degree, proving a minimal level of educational achievement. What they do with the degree after that is none of your concern, Rahm...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Better yet - educate! by swell · · Score: 1

      "perform basic math as needed to balance a checkbook..."

      Cute; I remember checkbooks. I used one as recently as last year. Geometry? I can't recall using that in recent decades. History yes. Most of those subjects will continue to be important.

      But none are a substitute for TFA. Young people need to learn what opportunities will be available to them and how to take advantage of them. It will be difficult because few teachers or school administrators know trends as well as we here do. Someone from Slashdot will have to sacrifice her $165K salary and show high school kids how the future is shaping up and how they can be part of it.

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
    2. Re:Better yet - educate! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Balance a checkbook: be able to do more than 2 math operations in a row. Turns out it is helpful in lots of situations, including just estimating how much money you're spending at the grocery store, how long your chore list will take to do, and yes - how much money you probably have left in your bank account. As far as geometry: it's a great foundation in basic logic (all those theorems are basic logic). Learn geometry, and you have an excellent grounding in basic logic.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    3. Re:Better yet - educate! by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      So when the cashier rings you up you just assume it's correct?

      The other month I took 30 1st graders to a park and when they rung us up they didn't give us the group package rate the website said we should have gotten. And no - it wasn't a simple "receipt says $X per person not $Y". It was $X for item A, $Y for item B, and $Z for item C because their POS system itemized each part of the package with an adult and child rate instead of just saying "Package" and then printed "X Child Items " instead of listing the per-person rate. (Literally the dumbest, most convoluted receipt I have ever seen).

      Simple arithmetic is how you notice that stuff and are able to tell the manager what they did wrong so they can fix it and refund you the overage. In the middle of a hoard of 1st graders who all just want to go inside and the cashier telling you that she rung you up right and the POS system is infallible.

    4. Re:Better yet - educate! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      "Geometry? I can't recall using that in recent decades."

      I find that difficult to believe. You never had to buy paint to repaint a room? How do you know how much to buy? Compute the area of the walls of the room perhaps? Same for buying grass seed or fertilizer for a lawn. Or carpet or tile for a floor. Thinking of how long of a ladder you need to get on your roof. If you had to do any kind of home maintenance you need some concept of geometry.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    5. Re:Better yet - educate! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      "perform basic math as needed to balance a checkbook..."

      Cute; I remember checkbooks.

      What's the shorthand term for a computerized accounting system? Logging into your bank account and checking your balance before buying something is not the same as taking control of your finances. If you write a check for local utilities (because that's all they take) and that check doesn't post for 20 days or so, you need to know that money is gone. If someone else's check / transaction posts to your account, you have to be able to spot the discrepancy (this has happened to me).

      The only difference between the 80's and now is that it's easier for anyone to download transactions from their bank to reconcile against. You still have to be able to spot the discrepancies if you care to find your missing money.

    6. Re:Better yet - educate! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's software for that now.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Better yet - educate! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      There's software for that now.

      Isn't that what I'm talking about?

      What's the shorthand term for a computerized accounting system?

      There's just no generic two-syllable nickname for it - "checkbook" is close enough is what I'm saying. I enter every purchase into a digital accounting system and I reconcile it against an OFX file. That is no different than balancing a checkbook in anything but convenient name and convenient time savings.

      But the point I was responding to is that tracking your own finances is not outdated. People are just lazy.

    8. Re:Better yet - educate! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm lazy, but I used to keep track of what money I had available at all times. Then I got to the point that my wife and I were making more money than we needed for our lifestyle, and so there's plenty of reserve money for odd expenses. Probably after retirement I'll have to start being more careful.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Better yet - educate! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That was how lots of people did it during the checkbook era too. I tend not to keep extra money in my primary account outside of what I'll need for expenses during that period. Everything else is put away elsewhere. And yeah, it is a little more work - but I know about mistakes right away.

  27. Great plan to keep the poor, poor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ignorance and arrogance of how the ruling class treats the poor knows no bounds. This plan will decrease the number of students that graduate, including those who have taken the classes and gotten the grades.

  28. Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Campaign for UBI so I can indulge a lifetime of online gaming.

    1. Re: Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish you luck! A future with only online wars would be great!

  29. Stupid bureaucracy creation scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the kids will ask each other what their plans are, and they'll come up with similar sounding bullshit like "I'm going to be a mechanic for Valvoline, then I'll go to Detroit and work for Ford or GM". And they'll promptly forget about what they "wrote".

    I know this, because we had mandatory "vocational counseling" back in the day too. You had to complete a multiple choice survey with questions like: "Filling bags with cement and carrying them across a work site" would be (choose one) 1) Not at all interesting; 2) Not very interesting; 3) Neither interesting nor uninteresting; 4) Somewhat interesting; 5) Extremely interesting.

  30. Sing it, mr. Cooper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't get a girl 'cause I ain't got a car
    I can't get a car 'cause I ain't got a job
    I can't get a job 'cause I ain't got a car
    So I'm looking for a girl with a job and a car

    1. Re:Sing it, mr. Cooper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't get a job 'cause I ain't got a job

  31. Democrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More loony crap out of one of our most depraved (D) hellholes. Par for the course too: you're a ward of the state and we'll order your life for you.

    1. Re:Democrats by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      This stupidity will die in court. The first class that has >1 student denied a diploma will form the basis of a class action; Chicago is filled to the brim with the sort of lawyers that will not hesitate to argue that this policy is discriminatory due to the minority demographics of the district. They'll be climbing over each other to get the case. If you are a Chicago student that may graduate under this policy and do not otherwise have plans you could win a nice settlement by setting yourself up to have your diploma denied; the lawyers will be looking for a poster child. Groom yourself and practice some lines about how your "future is in jeopardy" because you can't get your diploma. This stuff writes itself.

      The whole thing is so obviously infeasible that all the possible explanations one is left with for how Chicago's leadership thought it was a good idea to float this trial balloon are cynical. Maybe they really are that profoundly naive... Maybe they think the citizens are dumb enough to give them credit for trying... Maybe it's a scheme to embiggen student financing. Which of these is the worst?

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  32. Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US public education can't even compete compared to other countries. US students are stunted right out the gate in global job market. Unless your family is wealthy success is the exception.

    At least Chicago can feel good about knowing it was their student's lack of a plan that caused their failure. Not the shitty excuse for a public education system.

    The scantrons must flow!

  33. The rest of your life to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a teacher years ago who said that we shouldn't work while in school because we had the rest of our lives to work.

    I did anyway. Went to state and nothing.

    His son went backbacking on the Appalachian trail, bummed around Europe, I think did some charity work and got into Yale or something because he had such an interesting gap year.l

    I'm a nothing and he's an executive something somewhere.

    I learned how to show up and be cog in the wheel. He became an interesting person, saw the World and was able to contribute something that was more than his school learning and being a corporate cog.

    There's no "right way" anymore because even if you do everything "right", it can still end up being the wrong decision.

    I don't envy his career. I envy that he lived before he joined the grind.

    1. Re:The rest of your life to work. by Pascoea · · Score: 0

      Sounds like "rich daddy syndrome" to me. You don't "bum around Europe", go backpacking, and volunteer for a year for free. Neither is Yale.

    2. Re:The rest of your life to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean my parents paid for my college? LMFAO. No. Not even close. My dad never graduated high school. My mom barely graduated. They never impressed upon me that I should go to school after high school. They believe it's a liberal brainwashing camp. They also vote Trump. They also struggle with finances despite both owning their one small businesses.

      No, as an adult I realized I needed a degree, and didn't have the ability to live and go to school as a broke high school grad, so I joined the military for 3 years because I realized that having a degree was worth it when you look at the numbers and the minor chance I could be maimed or killed. Life is full of risks. Quit being a pussy. Safe is no better than sorry, to quote the ever-present 80s pop classic.

      And lo and behold, it was worth it.

      I went to a fairly expensive public research university. I had to take out loans above and beyond what the military provided me. I could have went to a cheaper school, but I liked the school a lot and felt it was worth it once I factored everything in. Students can come out of school with the same amount of debt as me (50k). They can then make a living wage while paying it down, and come WAY out in the lead in the long run.

      But given our high school education system, they'll never figure that math out on their own, unless they're already comfortable with it. And most aren't, which is sad.

    3. Re:The rest of your life to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a teacher years ago who said that we shouldn't work while in school because we had the rest of our lives to work.

      I did anyway. Went to state and nothing.

      His son went backbacking on the Appalachian trail, bummed around Europe, I think did some charity work and got into Yale or something because he had such an interesting gap year.l

      I'm a nothing and he's an executive something somewhere.

      I learned how to show up and be cog in the wheel. He became an interesting person, saw the World and was able to contribute something that was more than his school learning and being a corporate cog.

      There's no "right way" anymore because even if you do everything "right", it can still end up being the wrong decision.

      I don't envy his career. I envy that he lived before he joined the grind.

      Sounds like he was just smarter and more confident than you. He would likely have succeeded no matter how he went about things, you less likely. There are plenty of those who take the backpack route that never succeed, and there are plenty of 'cogs' that eventually do.

    4. Re: The rest of your life to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That fact that you didnt understand he was talking about the other guy makes it pretty obvious your education wasnt worth shit. You may have shown up for the right activities, but you definitely didnt play ball.

  34. "program"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a gap year program "?

    program? ...what?

  35. US Charter schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we should privatize education and let the free market sort it out.

    1. Re: US Charter schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately most charter schools must comply with State issued standardized tests. Influencing education standards that share similarities with US plublic education. Consequently most US students only do well on multiple choice exams rather than written.

  36. 50000 kids write down "astronaut" by rpresser · · Score: 1

    and overworked Chicago paper shufflers roll their eyes, stamp them "complete" and move on.

    Nothing changes.

  37. I wish they did that for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead, our senior year, the teachers were completely hands off and leaving everything up to us, seeking out the info, deciding our major, etc. Said they were preparing us for the college experience where nobody would hold our hand. When I went to my parents they said about the same, saying I should figure it out soon because I'll have to figure out how to get a job and move out as well.

    My core competencies were in designing video games, as I had done as a hobby and taught myself programming, but was failing in advanced math so I couldn't get into comp sci. Anyway teachers and parents convinced me video games was not a future but a mind numbing passtime so I got shamed out of pursuing that as a career.

    I didn't know wtf to do, took friends' advice, ended up kind of aimless really, pressure to get a job and move out so I dropped out taking whatever jobs sucker in people like me who don't have much guidance and made shit money. Now with a family I can't easily go back to school and have to try to hold on to what I have.

    So yeah this would have helped me a lot actually.

  38. Unconstitutional by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    That's an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Good luck. No wonder Chicago is such a shit-hole.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  39. Gap Year Program by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    So doing nothing with your life if OK, as long as you spend oodles of money doing it?
    Bumming around Europe getting tens of thousands of dollars into debt is fine, but exploring America or just hanging around is not acceptable. God forbid these children be allowed to exist for a single moment without someone telling them what to do.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  40. That's the most dumbassed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard in a long time.

  41. Ass-backwards-building complexes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    college, a trade apprenticeship, a gap year program or the military

    So which "complex" is that one's supporting? Also the GI bill as a "massive debt"? Interesting.

  42. Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is a great idea. What skill will young people consistently need more than any other? The ability to get around idiotic bureaucracy, of course. This law will give them a headstart. They'll be able to practice clever skills like applying to college for no reason or lying to a company they have no interest in working for, to secure a promise to that they'll be hired. With that skill they can then go into law or politics.

  43. Why not college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you need a job or school lined up to graduate from HS, why not extend that requirement to college? No job/internship/grad school, no college diploma? How many of you had a job lined up when you graduated from college?

  44. start in 8th grade by swell · · Score: 1

    Or earlier. Each year review the economic realities, employment trends and future forecasts with the students. Each student must balance

    Interests,
    Abilities and
    Future Potential.

    Certain young people, for instance may have great Interest in a sports career. They may even have some Ability. But they need to be told about the reality that only one in a million will make those million$ that they dream of. Almost no Future Potential.

    I used to date a hot girl who worked in a strip joint. She understood that her looks & skills would not last forever, so she went to college and studied Sanitation Engineering (sewer management). I'm confident that she has had a rewarding life since then. Lots of Potential, little competition.

    When I went to college in the 60s I wanted to study psychology, but I kept getting turned down when I requested psych classes. One day I discovered that 30% of our students were psych majors ... and it was the same across the US. Thank doG I had sense to realise that Future Potential was not there (although it may be good now).

    It's all about balance and awareness and young people tend to be weak in that area. Schools can help.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:start in 8th grade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stripper with a degree in sewerology... There's a good joke somewhere in there.

  45. Great business opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Plan mill". Really, how do you live in Chicago and not see that coming a mile away?

  46. That's just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd be even better if they focused on making sure students could actually read upon graduation instead of asking "so what now?"

    1. Re:That's just great... by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's probably a huge part of the motivation for this bullshit. Distracting the public from the abject incompetence of the Chicago schools administration is a bonus.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  47. Yea right by mhkohne · · Score: 1

    The thought that Chicago (part of a state that hasn't had a budget in 2 years) will have enough guidance people to make this work is laughable. There is something deeply sinister about holding the diplomas hostage to the state's view of what you should be doing with your life.

    Offering the students help with college or job finding? Definitely should be doing. Making them take classes on relevant things like resume writing? Probably a good idea.

    Forcing them to go down a path approved by politicians? NOT OK.

    I'd love to see a real lawyer's take on this. Given that the government does insist rather firmly on children attending school (Wisconsin v. Yoder ended up in the Supreme Court), I think you've got a bit of a conflict here.

    I wonder if lack of guidance assistance (which should be easy to prove - the guidance people will be overwhelmed in short order) could be used to litigate against this stupidity? Though, if you can show that minorities are getting less guidance assistance than whites (a thing that is almost certain to happen), I bet you could get the ACLU involved.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  48. Starting a business is not on this list. by generic_screenname · · Score: 1

    Why is that? Why are we training people to wait idly for jobs that may not come? Why are we not teaching them how to make more jobs?

    1. Re:Starting a business is not on this list. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great point! I started my first business when I was 16 to help my parents -- doing networking and writing code for customers. A program like this only discourages the people with drive even further.

      Then again, it is Chicago. Maybe "gangbanger" is on the approved list. "We be shootin' dem, feel me?"

  49. The nine most terrifying words in the English lang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
    -Ronald Reagan

  50. Thinking About One's Future by mentil · · Score: 1

    I think I understand the reasoning for this. Last I read on the subject, the only indicator significantly correlated with academic success was "parents talking to their children about their future". So, they make 'thinking about your future' mandatory, in an attempt to improve grades/standardized test scores/higher education rates.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  51. The real question here is... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What colleges will they push you towards, and what kickbacks do the schools and/or government get for dong so.

    Lots of kids starting to wake up to how much pointless debt most of them are wracking up in college, but the colleges will not go down quietly... you'll see more deals like this to herd the cattle into the slaughterhouse (metaphorically speaking for the slow among you).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  52. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only in 'murika.

  53. Fuck you too Rahm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fucking asshole. People like Republican Emanuel shit up the economy, shit up the schools, and then just shit some more on kids whose only "crime" is to be stuck in the middle of all of their shitting.

    1. Re:Fuck you too Rahm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to rain on your f-bomb parade, but Mayor Emanuel is a proud Democrat.

    2. Re:Fuck you too Rahm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because DINOs don't exist, AMIRITE?

  54. You're probably not from Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of you reading this article and posting are probably not from Chicago.

    Take a look at this map of murders; http://homicides.suntimes.com/homicides/map/2017/

    It's a terrible, horrific, and overall sad situation.
    Over 700 people were murdered in Chicago in 2016
    Thousands more shot, stabbed, assaulted EVERY YEAR!

    Pray these young people can make their graduation plan to leave Chicago and never go back
    Maybe they won't have stellar careers, but at least they'll be alive!

    1. Re:You're probably not from Chicago by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Over 700 people were murdered in Chicago in 2016

      1994 saw 931 murdered. 970 in 1974. The ~760 of 2016 is only remarkable in that it is a recent spike: the previous 3 years were all <500.

      The spike is the Ferguson effect. Black inner cities around the US have all seen the same spike since Ferguson; the police have withdrawn and the gangs are running wild. The worm will turn at some point; we've reached peak BLM and in places like Baltimore the citizens are clamoring for a crackdown. A few years from now, once the police inculcate the fact that the DOJ isn't spending all it's resources persecuting them, the numbers will improve.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  55. It will be ok by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Everyone's mind has matured by this stage of life - they've also had that flash of insight on how to carve a niche so "tout ira bien."

  56. Make money. Fuck bitches. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds legit to me.

  57. Maybe Illinois Could Pass a Budget Plan First... by Tulsa_Time · · Score: 1

    Before they pass this law.

    --
    5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
  58. Oh come on. Easy A. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Plan:

    1. Graduate
    2. Invent time machine.
    -------

    As if our broken education system needs anymore reach into the lives of our young people.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  59. it's stupid and only serves local colleges and mil by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    it's stupid and only serves local colleges, mcjobs and military.

    also. they should be able to get the diploma as just as the paperwork from pretty much any accredited high school if they have achieved all the necessary student credits to finish high school, shouldn't they?

    they left the loophole in there though: "I am having a gap year tending to my sick grandma and listening to old timey stories".

    never mind that you can cancel any of those plans (apart from military, maybe, if they require that you have already drafted yourself, which would be stupid _before_ acquiring the high school finishing papers).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  60. District cannot afford this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a school district that is so broke it had to take out a huge loan just to get to the end of the school year and not close early. There are no extra counselors to help with this. Since the kids who are not getting jobs or college acceptances are from the predominantly minority part of town, you can be sure that the denied diplomas will show a huge racial bias. Queue lawsuit that just takes more money away from education.

  61. Re:The nine most terrifying words in the English l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only one worse is "I'm from and I'm here to help."

  62. Terrible by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    This is really an excellent thing to do.

    It's a terrible thing to do. The reason school kids don't think ahead is that they never need to: there are close to zero consequences for not thinking ahead throughout school. We had a school in Alberta fire a physics teacher for giving zeros when students did not hand in assignments even after cajoling and extensions because it was school policy never to give zeros. So there is no need to plan your time to get homework done because there are no consequences when you don't.

    Requiring students to present their plans does nothing if you have spent the previous decade showing them that forward thinking is irrelevant. On top of that, it is grossly unfair because it is no business of the school what their students will choose, or not choose, to do with their qualifications. Universities do not revoke the degrees of graduates who commit crimes because, even if they chose to misuse it, they still have the education.

  63. with student loans just about any one can go to 4 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    with student loans just about any one can go to 4 years ones and community colleges does really have seamless transfer
      so should be 2 + 2 = 4 ends up being 2 + 2.5-3 = 4.5-5

  64. Rahm can go fuck himself. by jcr · · Score: 1

    At a time when the city and state are in dire financial straits, this asshole decides to pull a stunt that's going to waste millions in litigation before the court gets around to telling him that social engineering is not his fucking job.

    If a kid earns a diploma, you fucking give it to him. Their plans after they get it are none of Rahm's goddamned business.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  65. And let's not forget... by jcr · · Score: 1

    Rahm advocates slavery. That motherfucker has been beating the drum for "national service" since his days as Obama's chief lackey.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  66. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by dbIII · · Score: 1

    which would be stupid _before_ acquiring the high school finishing papers

    I'd argue the opposite. It seems these days that the military are just about the only ones actually training people. If you want to be a mechanic, electrician or a pile of other trades including aviation ones it's the choice that's most likely to actually get you there instead of having to wait for a lucky break. Friends and relatives that took the military path had a far smoother career track than I did.

  67. Jesus, what a fucking asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already hard enough for some kids, now they have to map out their brilliant future before they can receive the minimally useful high school diploma they already earned? Fuck that.

  68. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    I'd argue the opposite. It seems these days that the military are just about the only ones actually training people. If you want to be a mechanic, electrician or a pile of other trades including aviation ones it's the choice that's most likely to actually get you there instead of having to wait for a lucky break. Friends and relatives that took the military path had a far smoother career track than I did.

    before acquiring hs papers? I mean, you actually get a better crack at getting into such training in usa military?

    anyways, in my country(not usa) the military is just a thing everyone(man) gets drafted for 6-12 months and.. well, the military decides where you go, though you have more oppurtunities if you have your highschool papers already or better yet are already in the university. the point being that it's better to move the enrollment beyond you having finished high school.

    that and.. well the thing about military(usa too afaik) having the ability to order you where they want not the other way around, potentially to a warzone. potentially to get shot.

    still, any one of those post-highschool options you would be better off (and some requiring) you to have actually finished high school so it does sound a bit of a chicken and egg thing. I would understand if they were to use it to withheld some social security benefits or shit like that instead of the piece of paper.

    like, I am not totally opposite the idea - just the thing of using the diploma of what you did for past 3 years as the ransom - it doesn't make any sense, unless there is some connection to local universities, mcjobs etc. which actually let you gain admittance without presenting proof of passing high school(due to getting the _information_ that you passed high school through some state system). ..like, if you get admitted to university, wtf do you need the diploma for more anyways?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  69. What's wrong with national service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got independence and won WWW II on the backs of our forefathers. Now, we see that our bigger challenges are schools and infrastructure, and we want to recruit people to do that instead of fighting wars, that's slavery? You don't have a frigging clue what slavery is.

    1. Re:What's wrong with national service? by jcr · · Score: 2

      Fuck off, slaver. The people are not the property of the state, to be commanded by politicians.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  70. Curious by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    Does "I plan to travel the world for three years, scrounging to survive, before settling somewhere and seeking employment" count as a life plan?

    How about "I'd like to keep my options open; no plan as of yet?"

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  71. what about taking a year off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took a year off after high school. Under this plan, you can't do that. Ultimately, I got a B.S. in CS and work in IT. Perhaps, as some other posts have said, the plan will do more good than harm, but I can't see how they have the right to do it. Although you could get accepted to a college or university and choose not to go, I suppose, although if you actually wanted to go to that school, it'd be a bit strange to explain you had to have a letter to graduate but always planned to take some time off after high school when you reapply.

  72. Bullshit by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    lots of kids fail. I just put a kid through high school and it was brutal. And if you're not a) well-to-do b) a sports kid or c) rocking a 4.0+top 10 percentile SAT you're not going to college. You won't be able to raise the funds. My kid is doing it because we borrowed a shit load of money _and_ we're devoting just about every spare penny to the costs those loans don't cover. And yes, we got Pell Grants, a scholarship and some tutition wavers. Ever since Regan/Clinton defunded the universities college _devours_ money.

    You're a Community College professor? How can you not know this? Are you not listening to a damn thing your students say? And you wonder why they sit glassy eyed? Maybe it's become you're not teaching, you're preaching.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  73. Standard in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Students select which brand of high school to go in to. College planning with help doesn't seem like such a bad idea.

  74. Supreme court challenge by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    This will undoubtedly end up in a supreme court challenge, to the taxpayers' great expense. Bravo.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  75. GED, here we come! by Badlight · · Score: 1

    Basically, he's going to make it harder to graduate high school.

    What an asshole.

  76. Who's paying for it again? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    "You cannot have kids think that 12th grade is done."

    If a high school education isn't enough to be considered having met the base level for training required for "the real world", the free public education children are guaranteed needs to include post-secondary education.

    1. Re:Who's paying for it again? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      An extra 3 years of free university education or been in the mil and a few wars will correct everything.
      People will always return to their old communities with good credit, be ready for work and be working.
      They will have real credit to buy cars and take out huge home loans.
      New homes or renovated homes will all need to be filled with products and services. Thats new jobs too.
      Fast networks will be built as the new professionals can afford good internet.
      A new generation of lawyers, doctors, engineers, nurses and electricians living together in areas that have undergone full gentrification.
      The next generation will have fast internet and really good local school given all the new wealth. Just like all the other normal communities all over the USA that always did so well in testing every decade.

      Just the lack of fast internet and good schools spending per generation was all that was holding back some cities.
      3 years of free university, fast internet and good schools will fix everything in a generation. Some good nutrition too? Some spending on attracting jobs to the state? Rail links? Road repair? Clean water? How about some power company credits so the lights stay on for homework? Free medical too? Dental? Parks and new bicycle paths?
      Just free university, a few extra things to make study more fun and the state will get it all back in taxes soon.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Who's paying for it again? by whoda · · Score: 1

      The 12th grade means that next year they can start collecting their own public assistance and move into their own Section 8 crib.
      That's their future.

  77. Stupid by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 0

    Misguided like Chicago's other asinine statutes. Restore vocational / technical education in high schools, stop selling the bullshit notion that higher education is required and will bestow income and employment.

  78. What a moron ... typical shallow politician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kids need is honest leadership and honest opportunities, which isn't going to happen in this corrupt society based on selfishness and irresponsibility, that our leaders are so busy building up to even more catastrophic heights. The new tower of Babel is being built with boundless ambition and greed.

  79. Agreed, this is insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama disconnecting from Emanual was one of the better decisions of his presidency.

  80. Just point and laugh. by Chas · · Score: 1

    CPS has trouble graduating kids ALREADY. Less than 75% actually graduate.
    Over half of the graduates are simply not able to survive in college.
    And about 1/3rd of the remainder require extensive remedial courses before moving on to actual collegiate level classes.

    This is CPS's way of using a trebuchet to fire the cart WAYYY out in front of a very sickly, spavined old horse.

    All they're doing is setting these kids up for failure.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Just point and laugh. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And about 1/3rd of the remainder require extensive remedial courses before moving on to actual collegiate level classes.

      I used to work in a downstate university. This is absolutely true. In fact, there are late summer classes just for people with conditional admissions to acclimate them to college. And there is more assistance for first year freshmen there than I bet there ever was in the whole CPS system.

  81. Make it illegal to be dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved!

    1. Re:Make it illegal to be dumb by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Make it illegal to be dumb

      Problem solved!

      Seriously, can you see Trump passing that one?

  82. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by dbIII · · Score: 1

    to order you where they want not the other way around, potentially to a warzone

    Well yes - one of the reasons I didn't do it (I'm crap at following orders) and one of the reasons I have utter contempt for a nearby politician who did sign on and weaseled out via political connections when he was ordered to serve overseas (yet he still makes a lot of noise about being in the army). If you are not willing you don't sign up IMHO. If you are willing it's a better deal than many.

  83. Awful PR/Rollout, Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who make plans for their future have better outcomes. It is an invaluable life skill. A better way to roll out this out would be to add "life skills" or something similar to the curriculum for graduation. All high school students have one semester per year of life skills. Budgeting, healthy cooking, and planning/goal setting (freshman and senior years). The final project of the senior planning/goal setting class can be to develop a plan for their lives after high school. It's a huge change in their lives, a notoriously difficult adjustment. I think it would help a lot.

    The people here arguing about kids being trapped in the education industrial complex, give me a break. It's poor framing, but a great idea backed with lots of research, e.g. http://www.sehity.com/uploads/4/2/2/4/42243697/locke_-_1996_-_motivation_through_conscious_goal_setting.pdf.

  84. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by CaptQuark · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Spending about four years in the military gets you great training - college level training that transfers to most colleges. You also get tuition assistance while in the military and the GI bill to pay for college when you get out. Many folks can finish their bachelors degree and most masters degree programs without needing to acquire a huge student loan burden.

    Folks getting ready to enter the military take an aptitude test to determine what skills they already possess. Depending on your score you have a list of jobs to choose from. Mechanic, heavy equipment, avioinics, supply, culinary specialist, administration, biomedical equipment technician, security training, etc are all college certified training courses.

    Your four years also gets you other veterans benefits like VA home loans, transition assistance (similar to job placement), some hiring preference, group life insurance, and a mental discipline that most employers seek out.

    OK, this starts to sound like a recruitment pitch, but so many people equate military service with what they see on TV regarding Army Infantry service. The Navy and Air Force have completely different training programs and job series. The military isn't just rucksacks and M-16s.

    --
    (Disclaimer. Yes, I'm a retired veteran with a bias toward military service being good for most people. But I also realize it isn't for everyone.)

  85. Re: it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the extensive battery of tests, determining your aptitudes, and considering current military needs, the military has decided to assign you to:

    FRONT LINE INFANTRY!

  86. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmm so what about a woman who has studied hard and has gotten good grades, she then falls pregnant shortly before graduation. She can no longer do any of the required things due to the pending maternity but will seek employment etc after. Does this person not deserve her qualification she has earned academically? Sure this is an edge case but there are others.

    What about someone who again before graduation ends up having to be a full time carer for a terminally ill family member? Its not one of the required future plans does this caring person also not deserve their qualification?

    Stupid rules if you ask me, a qualification should be be earned by the results of their studies not of some future plans which at that age most of the students would not have a firm idea on. Sure provide more guidance and help for students to move on that should be done, but don't deny people who don't fit a limited criteria for their future plans.

  87. What a horrific idea... by Timothy2.0 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like just another way to shoehorn kids into some "socially acceptable" stream of behaviour.

    It's already *grossly* inappropriate to demand that 17/18 year olds choose an academic/career path that will shape the next decades of their lives. It denies them the very important maturing process of figuring that kind of thing out. How many people on this site, alone, changed majors in college? Dropped out to do something "fun"? Backpacked through Europe or Asia or South America or Africa trying to "find themselves"? How many work in fields unrelated to their education?

    Want a better plan to promote direction in youth? Do an economic assessment of your state, determine the jobs that will be needed 5 years down the road, and give preferential financial aid to those streams. Invest in the future, don't punish it.

  88. racist/classist down to the core by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is like schools now requiring a number of volunteer hours to graduate. Also the way school dress codes are enforced (and frequently work dress codes for that matter). They're all things that sound great on paper to the average white bread and for the average white bread is something that is easy for him/her to pull off, but for people that come from low income backgrounds they frequently are major hassles.

    It's also likely another way to force poor and minority youngsters into the military.

  89. Service Guarentees Citizenship by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    Would you like to know more?_

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  90. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    On the one hand, I'm glad your military looks after ex-service personnel to some extent, but I am concerned that it disproportionately incentivises poor people to put their lives on the line as the only way out of the intergenerational poverty trap....

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  91. STUDENT 100-28738 MY PLAN upon graduation by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    IN TOTAL BLISSFUL COMPLIANCE with the new directive that states that Chicago, praised be its name, will hold diplomas to students at any academic achievement level until they smear on this one last layer of dogmatic bullshit... I HUMBLY SUBMIT my action packed BUSINESS PLAN for the future.

    It has been a long while since high school completion status had any direct bearing on functional intelligence. Traditional employers knew this at one time and routinely conducted interviews of job applicants, and used their super-duper powers of personal judgement to decide, during a brief conversation, whether an applicant's failure to complete high school would have been for academic reasons but far more important, to spot strengths in the individual that transcend academic ability. But today they lack the courage to conduct interviews and wish to sort people by their simple answers on computerized forms. Corporations wish to eliminate 'undesirables' from their applicant pools and exclude non-graduates routinely without any idea of whether those people would have performed the same or better. In this lack of empirical experimentation the HS flag has actually become a more theological construct than an actual measure of fitness.

    If you doubt this consider modern use of the GED flag. Corporate applications require one to divulge whether their HS mark was derived from GED. Why? To further subsort applicants in sterile HR process and cast out more, of course. In a sense whether GED was used to complete HS is every bit as personal as asking directly what is the gender preference. 50 years ago GED was actually a mark of distinction, it identified the bearer as accelerated student or at the least, one who had taken extra time and effort to voluntarily obtain this mark into adulthood. But as employers devalued "the interview" and started grading on simple presence of the HS mark, masses of people obtained GED solely for the purpose of compliance, or so it is perceived. And so the GED is devalued today.

    IT IS THIS THEOLOGICAL BIAS that I will, upon graduation, begin to exploit to my great personal advantage. MY BUDS IN THE HOOD know that THE MAN is out to REAM THEIR ASS, and they know that many cases they cannot be truthful and direct about their personal ambitions. They also know THE MAN IS READY TO TIP THE FBI should their revealing personal essays trip some SORRY-ASS PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE today or even in future years, since THE MAN KEEPS RECORDS FOREVER ON COMPUTERS TO KEEP THE BROTHERS DOWN. Therefore, in addition to being stellar students and completely ready to take on the responsibilities of society they know they must BULLSHIT THE MAN AND LAY DOWN ONE MORE PIECE OF CRAP INTO THE SYSTEM. They know it's gonna COST THEM to do it 'right'. As my principal mode of business I will be the one to do it for them and COLLECT.

    I will open a number of "life coaching" centers that are uniquely streamlined to get through the process and FOOL THE MAN. My business will succeed because it will not be weighed down with real coaching, which would be an insult to their natural intelligence anyway. Since many will go on to make more money than I anyway. I will create underground literature that helps to make them paranoid about the process, even cast it into political terms. I will have race-based campaigns and blue-collar campaigns tailored to exploit the anxieties of each individual, to convince them that Chicago wants to get something from them to keep on file.

    THEREFORE, my value-added "ambitions for the future" content sold by subscription and through HOOD franchises and COLLECTION 'AGENCIES', will supply these fine young men and women with a variety of quality custom life scenarios. They'll pick their future from a hat and I'll load the hat. My representatives will sit with them to describe their future profiles, develop a convincing presentation and ace the HS requirement.

    I'll use computers too so it'll be great. I'm the MAN!

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  92. Future plan: "Go to prison." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chimpcago... LOL.

  93. no job? have to stay in high school? by lpq · · Score: 1

    So, if you have no plans because you haven't found a job ... that didn't seem to be on their list. Or can you say your plan is to "take some time off to think about what you want to do"?

    My bet is as 2020 approaches and they actually try to implement this -- they'll realize all the holes the new plan has.

    For the person thinking this would increase poverty -- if this law went into effect, some court will order the school to give out a diploma equivalency document for someone who didn't want to disclose their future plans at graduation.

  94. entomology and CS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me, it was entomology and then I decided to go to CS.

    Aren't these the same thing? (study of bugs?)

  95. Would we expect the same from higher education? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Would this be acceptable policy at a college or university? How would you feel if after completing your coursework the university withheld your diploma simply because you decided not to do anything else afterwards?

    Who enforces the planning outcome anyway? What happens when a high school senior simply walks away from a minimum wage job offer obtained only to fulfill a graduation requirement?

    Congratulations Rahm - you've just created yet another system to be gamed.

  96. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you hop in the recruiter's van and take the ASVAB, score a 98, then have the recruiter tell you they don't really have anything to offer you that would beat what you can accomplish in the private sector. So you go off and be successful instead of becoming a drone. In the meantime he's trying to console a couple of guys who traveled there with you that if they can just make a 40...

  97. Lets model America after Chicago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is yet another aspect of Chicago that we should model America after.

  98. It's Chicago by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    The best future plans they could make would be: " I'm leaving asap so I don't get gunned down by gang violence in a city that has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. "

    or

    " I'm leaving for Germany where I can get a full education without being a debt slave for the rest of my life. Is why I took German as my secondary language requirement. "

  99. What choices? by ai4px · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about a girl completing high school who just wants to marry and have some kids? Being a homemaker doesnt seem to be one of the prescribed choices! This is the central planner way of micromanaging everyone's life. If the kids show competency required to finish high school, give them their diploma. Not everyone knows what they want to be, nor does everyone actually become what they profess to want to be. I remember as a kid hearing about communist Russia dictating who would be what when they grew up. Seems we are moving in that direction - for the betterment of the dear citizens of course.

    1. Re:What choices? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Is the groom going to call off the wedding unless the bride has a high school certificate?

      I'm not saying a stay at home mom (or husband) should not have a high school education, they should. I'm saying that no one is going to check for a piece of paper for that lifestyle choice.

      Once the kids are grown the housewife/househusband might decide to enter the workforce and supplement a single earner income for retirement. Having a piece of paper that shows a high school education might be important then. There's plenty of low cost alternatives to that though.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:What choices? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      What about a girl completing high school who just wants to marry and have some kids? Being a homemaker doesnt seem to be one of the prescribed choices!

      I also don't see "lottery winner" as one of the prescribed choices, and for the same reason; your chances of success are slim to none.

      Gone are the days of surviving on only one income. Not only are both parents working these days, but they likely have more than one job each.

      The "gig" economy was born from necessity, not because it was deemed the hipster cool thing to do by millennials.

      And yes, it is sad that homemaker has almost become a financial impossibility, given the true value of spending quality time raising children.

    3. Re:What choices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ding ding without a wedding ring.

    4. Re:What choices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does a girl who's just going to marry and have kids (and presumably not work) need a diploma? Does the diploma actually help when raising kids?

    5. Re:What choices? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And yes, it is sad that homemaker has almost become a financial impossibility

      And so has childcare. If you're not well-qualified to make better than minimum wage, it may just about break even.

    6. Re:What choices? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I don't like the idea of "plenty of low-cost alternatives" here. She earned a diploma, and I consider it unacceptable to deny it because she chose a potentially reasonable alternative that wasn't covered. There are people who can make a reasonable income, enough to support a family (I'd suggest that the US median household income of $56K has got to be more than enough), and marrying one of those right out of high school with intent to stay home and raise a family sounds like a plan to me. I'd strongly advocate having a backup plan if the marriage goes sour, and a high school diploma is useful in that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:What choices? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The obvious solution to that is to make marriage a requirement for that path, and have them present their wedding license as "proof". (I kid!)

      The other thing that would be missing is entrepreneurship. Looks like working for the man is okay, but saying you're going to start your own business doesn't seem like it's going to be accepted.

    8. Re:What choices? by ai4px · · Score: 1

      I second your backup plan as well. Here's another upshot.... Say the stay home mom wants to homeschool their kids in the future and the State decides that since she doesn't have a high school diploma she cannot educate her own kids. It could happen the way society is going. After all, they aren't /our/ kids, they are The State's kids.

  100. Not regular plans, *future* plans by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    This grinds on me. Plans are inherently for the future.

    High School should teach economy of language.

    --
    -Dave
  101. Just make sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it's multiple choice that 'drug dealer' 'gang member' and 'career criminal' are on there as well. How many of the morons who write this law actually doing what they planned at 18?

  102. Other plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drug dealer, bang banger, hip hop wannabe, crack addict, single parent.

  103. Could they deny Porn Stars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm going to be a porn star, here's my audition tape for proof, Rahm. "

  104. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I am concerned that it disproportionately incentivises poor people to put their lives on the line as the only way out of the intergenerational poverty trap....

    So, you'd rather not give them that option, for their own good of course.

  105. Won't anyone think of the trust fund children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if a trust fund child wants to spend the next ten years travelling the world? Will no one give this kid a diploma?

  106. Sounds fine by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

    They need to make sure that "I'm gonna be a Baller" and "I'm gonna be a Gansgtah" qualify as acceptable answers since most kids in the Inner City - or anywhere else for that matter - have no fucking clue beyond what they see around them or in the media or by dreams of making it our of the hood. This is frankly a white man assuming that everyone has a defined plan for their lives.

  107. Typical Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to tell you how to raise your children and control every aspect of your life. Wake up and realize that Democrats are trying to keep you slaves to the wealthy. Support Trump to save America.

  108. More paperwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. This is like OKR (Objectives Key Results) stuff that allows people in big companies to make it look like they are doing their job and "moving forward". Because doing your job is just not enough, you have to tell them your plans for the future. Having a backlog of tickets is not enough if it's not also duplicated in three other places in different forms.

  109. Plan? Yeah right by jediborg · · Score: 1

    Chicago's "Plan" already ruined most of these kids lives by giving them terrible education. Illinois's "Plan" has the whole state on the edge of bankruptcy, unable to pay its current bills and having to call an emergency session of congress. Yes, these people should TOTALLY be making a "Plan" for our kids to plan their future. OR they can shut the f up and let the kids dig the state out of the hole the planners created.

  110. Unconstitutional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our constitution prohibits involuntary servituide.

    Requiring people to have a job sounds involuntary to me.
    Our prohibition on involuntary servituide not only prohibits slavery, but other forms of involuntary servituide (except, for some reason, the draft), such as peonage and indentured servituide.

    If anyone from this program is listening, scrap it before you geg dragged into an expensive lawsuit only to lose and have the program invalidated and struck down by a federal judge.

  111. Employer to student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you need a job to graduate, huh?
    Look we don't pay for non graduates but you can work here for just $100/month. So you get to graduate just fine.

  112. Parents? by kenh · · Score: 1

    Why can't parents take on this responsibility? Can't they encourage their children to have a plan for post-high school?

    Let me guess, parents don't have time to turn to their 15 year-old and ask them "what do you want to be when you grow up?" The Chicago Public Schools have all but eliminated career counseling (according to the article, I have no first-hand experience with CPS), and now they want to make it mandatory that all seniors get career counseling?!?! Their commitment to this idea seems like a hastily slapped-together response to distract from a failing public school system.

    Honestly this seems like something that would make more sense after they eliminate "social promotion", enforce strict graduation requirements that has High School graduates performing at a high school level in things like math and reading, and have gotten their drop out rate under control.

    Just curious, can the Chicago community colleges absorb all the high school graduates that fail to either find a job or secure admission to a four year college? Because that is where they are going to head, in all likelyhood.

    --
    Ken
  113. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

    As long as they still have the option to sell me their organs I'm not seeing the problem.

  114. Re: it's stupid and only serves local colleges an by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in the infantry. I scored a 95 ASVAB overall. 131 GT. Over 115 on every metric.

    Recruiter said, "What do you want to do? You're qualified to do anything."

    He looked on in horror when I chose infantry. "You know what that is right?" Yeah dipshit, I'm smart, please see my scores.

    I was an ROT (basic wireless encrypted communications stuff), a grunt, a team leader, and a vehicle commander before my 3 years was done.

    Just because you carry a gun and shoot stuff and get shot at doesn't mean you gain no skills.

  115. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Hell even if you don't want to go and get trained in one of those skilled positions the military is a really good way to get ahead. While I did not do the military I had a lot of friends and relatives who did and there are ways to really game the system. Not only the tuition assistance and GI bill but a bunch of other stuff. From what I can gather the best way to get ahead is to:

    1. Become an Eagle Scout, give you a an initial rank boost, I gather that being fairly high up in the civil air patrol also does this
    2. Join the national guard reserves when you turn 17 and you do your basic training the summer between your junior and senior year
    3. Apply to a college that has an ROTC program and get in it
    4. Inform your reserve unit leader that you are doing ROTC in college, this usually gets you another bump in rank and the additional pay
    5. Because you are in the reserves and ROTC you 4 year degree is fully paid for as well as everything else for college plus spending money
    6. After completing college if there is a commission available you get to serve out your ROTC debt and there will very likely be a spot for you given how much has already been invested
    7. At this point you have between 5 and 5.5 years of service and remember that Eagle scout you earned, so instead of going in as second lieutenant you will be at least a first lieutenant with a likely rapid promotion or even start as a captain.
    8. While serving out your officer duty continue taking advantage of the military for additional courses and continued education
    9. At the end of your mandatory service, I think it is now 6 years, you now have at least 11 years in total, so you can continue for another 9 and get an officers pension at age 37, go into the private sector as someone with lots of schooling and experience, go work for a government contractor, or decide to ladder climb and see if you can become an general or admiral.

    Once done you will have a debt free college education, training in a useful skill (you enlisted job training), have clear leadership skills (you were an officer), maybe a pension, additional classes beyond a bachelors degree, and provided you didn't drink your paycheck or do other really dumb things with it a good amount of savings. This assumes that everything works out perfectly and you get things sorted out early which is usually the hard part for most people as those first 3 steps are the hard ones to take. I know people who have done one or more from 1, 2 and 3 but never all and in each case they do have a leg up over those who didn't do any. This also assumes that you did fairly well in high school and got a reasonable ASVAB score that doesn't limit you.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  116. Re: it's stupid and only serves local colleges a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoops. RTO not ROT.

  117. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you know, some countries offer free education to everyone, which is a lot better a deal than free education as the grand prize in The Running Man.

  118. LMAO! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that one surviving the ACLU, NAACP et al.

  119. So, no college or military without a JOB first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that that in this day in age people can't get into a college or the military without already having a diploma FIRST. And if they won't be given a diploma unless they've secured one of these mentioned prerequisites first, that eliminates those two as options because they cancel each other out. That only leaves the job or trade apprenticeship. But even that might be difficult because last time I checked, there were fewer younger folks working at McDonalds. So they gotta really compete with the older generation to get a job or apprenticeship first in their teen years first, then the diploma, then college or the military.

  120. Seriously how many people know at that age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for future planning and consideration but there's very few students who really know what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Most have barely experienced anything at all of the real world so how can you really ask them to plan the next 50 years of their life? Implementing a program to open their eyes to different routes is great, making it a requirement to pick a road is just silly

  121. is it slavery if you get to choose your master? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Are we living in some sort of dystopia where the purpose of life is to be a productive little citizen and go straight to work for your corporate/military masters in your government-approved plan? You work not so much to make money, but to avoid becoming excommunicated and forced into destitution. Obey and you'll get enough to survive.

  122. Re: it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're in medicine or dentistry or something that's not really military you get into a high rank based on your civilian credentials.

    Otherwise, you start as a lieutenant because you actually need to know shit to become a captain.

  123. Re: it's stupid and only serves local colleges an by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Also related, OCS is quite difficult, at least in the Marines. I can't speak for the other services, but I was stationed with the sorry bastards that were doing OCS. I was not an officer.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  124. Re:it's stupid and only serves local colleges and by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It worked for the Romans so why not for us.
    Also why not - just because almost nobody else offering jobs to a major chunk of the population doesn't mean the military should abandon them as well instead of looking for people with potential. The answer IMHO is to have orgs other than the military and sports looking for talent outside of a narrow class range.

  125. You forget, it's Chicago.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You all forget, this is Chicago Public Schools we're talking about. They already have an overall dismal graduation rate of only 57%, and can't even accurately count their own students, and "somehow" keep mislabeling dropouts as transfers or branched to homeschooling. They're banking on their flagging enrollment rates to help boost their grad rate numbers.

    Also remember, this is Chicago... if you have any kind of money at all, you don't put your kid in Chicago Public Schools, you put them in a private school.

  126. Elephant by printwithstyle · · Score: 1

    Nobody is addressing the elephant in the room here, the fact that 'future plans' is an oxymoron! amiright?!

  127. No, nobody is this stupid by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the phrase "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" was popularized by right wing think tanks trying to demonize help from the government. There is no teacher alive that wouldn't tell the mayor to go pound sand if asked if this was a good idea. If they wanted to help they could spend more on consoling services.

    No, this is pure evil. The question is what, specific evil prompted it? I'd genuinely like to know. And I hop the folks in Chicago figure it out so they can shut it down and maybe vote the clown out that suggested this.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  128. Armed Forces Recruiting by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

    This will be a good way to railroad the poor who aren't sure what they want to do yet in life into the Armed Forces.