The study doesn't look at false positives either. Throw in a picture of a brown paper bag, and the human will declare it an eye, while the computer will (correctly) not find it among the stated possibilities. Same with a squirrel called a horse. The human brain is really good at coming up with an answer, even if there isn't enough information for an answer. Computers are more likely to reject all answers, rather than settle on the wrong one because it seems more probable (at least the ones used in these types of games). So focusing on false negatives without allowing for the possibility of false positives seems like a poor experimental setup. Perhaps someone will look at the study and make a more useful and complete study based on it that will give more useful results.
Yes, if you hop in an oven at 600F, you'll burn lots of calories, and come out much lighter. But for the large middle section, where 99% of the population lives, metabolism and other poorly understood mechanisms dominate over the limits imposed by thermodynamics.
There's no court for parking fines, they aren't criminal acts, so they keep down costs by eliminating court. You can contest a ticket for free by filing the correct form. Though, I've done it in multiple cities in multiple countries, never for London, where this is aimed (or any of the UK).
And even in the strict sense, you can't count lawyers, like you can't count cockroaches. There are too many of them, and nobody wants the job of counting them. So less would be correct by all rules.
The costs are often because they confiscate large amounts of private land to make the facilities. It should be a rule that any new facility to host the olympics must be made from previously public land, not displacing a single person or business. You can't even make it voluntary, as there are different standards to that as well. Everyone displaced in China for Beijing olympics went willingly. Though the implied alternative was death, so the level of voluntary is debatable, hence why it shouldn't be allowed.
Instead, the games are used as an excuse to displace the greatest number of people possible. China used the olympics as an excuse to clear slums around Tienan Men Square (older 2-story barracks holding families, that didn't have running water, and only barely electricity). There were better places to put things, but it was an excuse to bulldoze unwanted neighborhoods without public outcry.
Sometimes it isn't the management, but the funding. You can't get blood from a stone. And you can't do good management without funding to carry out the necessary work.
So who walked to the Solomon Islands? Why have domesticated animals been depicted back as long as records have existed? Because humans have *not* walked everywhere.
Yes, and they walked with food and support provided by the UN and others. They didn't pack for a month long walk self-contained. When that's been done historically it results in mass death. Go read up on the Trail of Tears.
And the refugees that went to Germany, many made the last leg on a train. They walked to refugee camps, but once assigned resettlement destinations, traveled as you would have (except you'd have paid extra for first class on the train, so you wouldn't have to sit with them).
Thermodynamics is never violated, but the "common sense" interpretation of it is false. That's not a thermodynamics violation, but a logic fail by everyone who uses a simple rule they don't even understand to try to understand a complex issue. Fewer calories drops a body into "starvation mode", and you gain weight by eating less (a violation of "thermodynamics" as understood by the idiots). And you gain weight by burning more calories (another violation from the "thermodynamics" idiots).
The laws of thermodynamics are never violated, they are just beyond the understanding of anyone who cites thermodynamics in their fat shaming.
Nope. If you further reduce their caloric intake, their body will go into a starvation mode that will cause even more weight gain.
Thermodynamics is never violated, but there isn't a practical way to measure the calories out of a person. Metabolic rates are different enough, and waste isn't easily measured.
This experiment proved that if you burn more calories, you gain weight. Others have proven that if you eat fewer calories, you gain weight. So your statement has been proven false many times.
And if it's revealed that Apple keeps secret backdoors to all their stuff, the corporations that are just now warming up to iPhones would stop spending money with Apple, after they provable hack their own phones, regardless of how trivial that is.
I'm not saying they can or can't do it. I'm saying that regardless of whether they can, they'll do all they can to not do it.
Egregious Unconstitutional Overreach Subpoena: Prove that P=NP, provide working code that breaks AES-256 on a Timex Sinclair ZX-81, derive 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 from first principles, or go to jail.
That's not what this particulat subpoena was for, so you are apparently in agreement with me. "Show up in court with your medical bills for the last year" is a perfectly valid subpoena, right? So why isn't "show up in court with the password to Bob's phone"? Apple has multiple backdoors built in, they just don't want to disclose them and appear insecure. They are just starting to crack the enterprise market and don't want anyone to know how trivially they can break into a phone.
Then it's simple fraud, not an ACA overreach. Blaming Obama for everything is insane. Obama killed Scalia, yet none of the Republicans calling for an investigation want to look into the illegal bribe Scalia was accepting while he died.
The wikileaks handover was to release it to the public when the government had him killed in custody. I guess I could have named other ways to hold/hide the documents to be released only if the whistle blowing was a failure by Congress not following the law.
And I don't have to make as many such suggestions here, as the corruption index is much lower.
No, there is not a $20 medical tax on your new fishing pole. Odds are you are lying. That was a seller error applied to a few errors that went viral. You are lying when you said it happened to you. You heard about it on some conservative talk show that does no fact checking, and repeat the lies.
Given the poor treatment and lack of protection for legal whistleblowers, do you honestly think that would have been the best course?
Though, in hind sight, he should have sent the entire leak to Wikileaks, with the condition that they hold it until the congressional hearing, then blown the whistle officially. He'd have died in prison before any hearings, and then the package would be published by Wikileaks. But Snowden put his life over following the whims of the freedom-haters wanted.
And your argument is wrong. The fault isn't the adminsitration's, but that of those who fought it all the way up. They picked a bad test case for "tax as a means of force". That's why so many cases go uncontested. Roe vs Wade was the test case because Roe was raped, so it was a question of can you abort a rape baby. Rosa Parks was a good case to focus on because it was a Black woman sitting in the Black section who didn't get up when the driver ordered her to. The white man who the bus driver was clearing the space in the Black section didn't even want her seat, though I have no idea if that's because he didn't want to displace a tired person already settled in for a long bus trip, or he objected to sitting in the Blacks section.
Those that funded the attack on ACA, if they really were constitutional purists, should have picked a better test case, ACA is effectively a head tax levied by the state and paid to the feds (explicitly legal, and how much of the taxes went for many years). The only "new" thing was having people pay the insurance "tax" to the private company directly, or the federal government. Worded right, it's not a problem.
But the feds ordering Apple to make something or get taxed is different, and would likely fail. And ACA isn't a precedent making that legal, but the legal hurdles for it may be harder now because the incompetent and trigger happy ACA haters have a similar case where an arguably similar thing was legal. Blame the ACA haters for bringing a poor suit and losing it. That's what set the precedent. ACA didn't set a precedent at all.
Gear will be laundered at a high enough temperature to kill microbes.
Does nobody know the definition of "cleaned" "sanitized" and "sterilized" anymore? Gear will be sanitized. It's not that hard when there's already a word dedicated to that meaning.
Sadly, if you want a horrible album by an egotistic weirdo, Good Times is easier to listen to, so long as you skip the tracks where Kim Dotcom is actually singing.
Nope. Was under power, I was driving it. Driving along, accelerating slightly to get ahead in traffic, then dead. And your example is about the worst you can get. And they are what, $30 each for the more expensive valves? Ends up about $1000 in parts for a broken timing belt. What's the cost on a clutch for a 928? $2000 for a clutch kit? $1000 isn't much for a repair, compared to the regular running costs.
Slashdot Mirror
The study doesn't look at false positives either. Throw in a picture of a brown paper bag, and the human will declare it an eye, while the computer will (correctly) not find it among the stated possibilities. Same with a squirrel called a horse. The human brain is really good at coming up with an answer, even if there isn't enough information for an answer. Computers are more likely to reject all answers, rather than settle on the wrong one because it seems more probable (at least the ones used in these types of games). So focusing on false negatives without allowing for the possibility of false positives seems like a poor experimental setup. Perhaps someone will look at the study and make a more useful and complete study based on it that will give more useful results.
Yes, if you hop in an oven at 600F, you'll burn lots of calories, and come out much lighter. But for the large middle section, where 99% of the population lives, metabolism and other poorly understood mechanisms dominate over the limits imposed by thermodynamics.
There's no court for parking fines, they aren't criminal acts, so they keep down costs by eliminating court. You can contest a ticket for free by filing the correct form. Though, I've done it in multiple cities in multiple countries, never for London, where this is aimed (or any of the UK).
And even in the strict sense, you can't count lawyers, like you can't count cockroaches. There are too many of them, and nobody wants the job of counting them. So less would be correct by all rules.
The IOC claims that the games are a net benefit to the hosting country, so can Greece afford not to host them?
The costs are often because they confiscate large amounts of private land to make the facilities. It should be a rule that any new facility to host the olympics must be made from previously public land, not displacing a single person or business. You can't even make it voluntary, as there are different standards to that as well. Everyone displaced in China for Beijing olympics went willingly. Though the implied alternative was death, so the level of voluntary is debatable, hence why it shouldn't be allowed.
Instead, the games are used as an excuse to displace the greatest number of people possible. China used the olympics as an excuse to clear slums around Tienan Men Square (older 2-story barracks holding families, that didn't have running water, and only barely electricity). There were better places to put things, but it was an excuse to bulldoze unwanted neighborhoods without public outcry.
Sometimes it isn't the management, but the funding. You can't get blood from a stone. And you can't do good management without funding to carry out the necessary work.
So who walked to the Solomon Islands? Why have domesticated animals been depicted back as long as records have existed? Because humans have *not* walked everywhere.
Yes, and they walked with food and support provided by the UN and others. They didn't pack for a month long walk self-contained. When that's been done historically it results in mass death. Go read up on the Trail of Tears.
And the refugees that went to Germany, many made the last leg on a train. They walked to refugee camps, but once assigned resettlement destinations, traveled as you would have (except you'd have paid extra for first class on the train, so you wouldn't have to sit with them).
And die of starvation on your walk? When you assume you can eat for a year while "poor" you don't understand what that means.
Gravity is just a theory.
Thermodynamics is never violated, but the "common sense" interpretation of it is false. That's not a thermodynamics violation, but a logic fail by everyone who uses a simple rule they don't even understand to try to understand a complex issue. Fewer calories drops a body into "starvation mode", and you gain weight by eating less (a violation of "thermodynamics" as understood by the idiots). And you gain weight by burning more calories (another violation from the "thermodynamics" idiots).
The laws of thermodynamics are never violated, they are just beyond the understanding of anyone who cites thermodynamics in their fat shaming.
Nope. If you further reduce their caloric intake, their body will go into a starvation mode that will cause even more weight gain.
Thermodynamics is never violated, but there isn't a practical way to measure the calories out of a person. Metabolic rates are different enough, and waste isn't easily measured.
This experiment proved that if you burn more calories, you gain weight. Others have proven that if you eat fewer calories, you gain weight. So your statement has been proven false many times.
And if it's revealed that Apple keeps secret backdoors to all their stuff, the corporations that are just now warming up to iPhones would stop spending money with Apple, after they provable hack their own phones, regardless of how trivial that is.
I'm not saying they can or can't do it. I'm saying that regardless of whether they can, they'll do all they can to not do it.
Egregious Unconstitutional Overreach Subpoena: Prove that P=NP, provide working code that breaks AES-256 on a Timex Sinclair ZX-81, derive 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 from first principles, or go to jail.
That's not what this particulat subpoena was for, so you are apparently in agreement with me. "Show up in court with your medical bills for the last year" is a perfectly valid subpoena, right? So why isn't "show up in court with the password to Bob's phone"? Apple has multiple backdoors built in, they just don't want to disclose them and appear insecure. They are just starting to crack the enterprise market and don't want anyone to know how trivially they can break into a phone.
Then it's simple fraud, not an ACA overreach. Blaming Obama for everything is insane. Obama killed Scalia, yet none of the Republicans calling for an investigation want to look into the illegal bribe Scalia was accepting while he died.
The wikileaks handover was to release it to the public when the government had him killed in custody. I guess I could have named other ways to hold/hide the documents to be released only if the whistle blowing was a failure by Congress not following the law.
And I don't have to make as many such suggestions here, as the corruption index is much lower.
The conclusion is, burning more calories increases weight. All the "it's thermodynamics" assholes are wrong.
http://www.factcheck.org/2013/...
http://www.snopes.com/politics...
No, there is not a $20 medical tax on your new fishing pole. Odds are you are lying. That was a seller error applied to a few errors that went viral. You are lying when you said it happened to you. You heard about it on some conservative talk show that does no fact checking, and repeat the lies.
Pick a more believable lie next time.
Given the poor treatment and lack of protection for legal whistleblowers, do you honestly think that would have been the best course?
Though, in hind sight, he should have sent the entire leak to Wikileaks, with the condition that they hold it until the congressional hearing, then blown the whistle officially. He'd have died in prison before any hearings, and then the package would be published by Wikileaks. But Snowden put his life over following the whims of the freedom-haters wanted.
And your argument is wrong. The fault isn't the adminsitration's, but that of those who fought it all the way up. They picked a bad test case for "tax as a means of force". That's why so many cases go uncontested. Roe vs Wade was the test case because Roe was raped, so it was a question of can you abort a rape baby. Rosa Parks was a good case to focus on because it was a Black woman sitting in the Black section who didn't get up when the driver ordered her to. The white man who the bus driver was clearing the space in the Black section didn't even want her seat, though I have no idea if that's because he didn't want to displace a tired person already settled in for a long bus trip, or he objected to sitting in the Blacks section.
Those that funded the attack on ACA, if they really were constitutional purists, should have picked a better test case, ACA is effectively a head tax levied by the state and paid to the feds (explicitly legal, and how much of the taxes went for many years). The only "new" thing was having people pay the insurance "tax" to the private company directly, or the federal government. Worded right, it's not a problem.
But the feds ordering Apple to make something or get taxed is different, and would likely fail. And ACA isn't a precedent making that legal, but the legal hurdles for it may be harder now because the incompetent and trigger happy ACA haters have a similar case where an arguably similar thing was legal. Blame the ACA haters for bringing a poor suit and losing it. That's what set the precedent. ACA didn't set a precedent at all.
So you don't know what a subpoena is, and are complaining that one of the more settled parts of law is invalid because you don't understand it?
It's hard to take the US seriously when he's freer in that horrible country than the USA.
Gear will be laundered at a high enough temperature to kill microbes.
Does nobody know the definition of "cleaned" "sanitized" and "sterilized" anymore? Gear will be sanitized. It's not that hard when there's already a word dedicated to that meaning.
Sadly, if you want a horrible album by an egotistic weirdo, Good Times is easier to listen to, so long as you skip the tracks where Kim Dotcom is actually singing.
Nope. Was under power, I was driving it. Driving along, accelerating slightly to get ahead in traffic, then dead. And your example is about the worst you can get. And they are what, $30 each for the more expensive valves? Ends up about $1000 in parts for a broken timing belt. What's the cost on a clutch for a 928? $2000 for a clutch kit? $1000 isn't much for a repair, compared to the regular running costs.