You said "citation", you didn't specify which thing you wanted specified.
I gave a dismissive and irrelevant answer because if you are too stupid to know reality, you are too stupid to accept it were I to present a 500 page research paper with 500 proper citations. So "citations needed" is proof of the citation requestor's idiocy, not any deficiency in the original poster.
I agree that most rich CEOs weren't in the military, Silver Spoon upper class like Donald Trump were draft dodgers, and didn't serve, sending others to die for their Right for Profit. But some did actually serve.
"Do you have any bias against testimony by police officers?" was one of the explicit questions asked when I last served. It was one of the few they asked everyone in the court room, before the indicidual selection started. But each area does their selection differently
Oh, because I've seen some complaints (here and elsewhere) about the reparations for concentration camps in WWII for funny looking US citizens, at least some of whom are still alive. http://allegiancemusical.com/ one of which is currently starring in an autobiographical story about it.
When you can cheat for so long with nobody finding out that you can ruin hundreds of thousands of lives, then the system is also broken.
She should have had to serve the time of all of her victims x 3. She got off way too easily.
And what "punishment" for a system that has allowed a single person to screw up 50,000 or so cases? The system is fine. It fucks the poor. It fucks the minorities. It fucks the people we don't like. So keep the system the way it is, and replace the broken cog in the broken machine, and let the broken machine still pump out bad results.
And 3x the time of the victims is a silly sentence. Let's say every conviction (some wrongly, some rightly) were 1 year (some shorter, some longer), that's 34,000 (current estimate, could be more) years in prison. That's purely symbolic and does nothing to prevent this from happening again, nor make any of the tainted convictions right.
But righting a wrong after it happens is called "reparations" and isn't allowed in the US. Or is it only hated so strongly because we end up owing them primarily to non-white people?
The people of the US don't hate China. The people of the US can't even find it on a map. The people of the US only hate because the few zealots claim the Jews are the source of all their country's problems, and a vote for the National Socialist Worker's Party is the only way to stay safe and keep the American Way of life.
I love how having a veteran at the top who is a member of a political party makes them a government stooges in China, but the US asserts the same in a US company shouldn't be held against it on the international stage.
Such things are easier if you copy an existing standard. DCS (Domain Certificate Service), modeled after DNSSEC with certs handed out, rather then DNS resolution. Then all you need is to get BIND or Infoblox or someone to buy in, and you'll get a large organization pushing it for you. A for-profit company like Infoblox or Men and Mice may jump at the opportunity to be the "first and only" at a new security feature. And once you have them pushing for you, it's easier.
The vast majority of the natives (or, if you prefer, land bridge immigrants, since nobody was actually native to North America)
By that definition of native and immigrant, there are no natives, except a few Africans. If you got there before anyone else, it's not immigration, it's settlement. Though that word is misused when people settle in inhabited areas.
A quick look of the Our Lady of Mercy and I must know nothing about maritime law. It was a wreck lost in Portuguese water sailing from South America to Spain. Why wouldn't the look be kept by those who found it? That's what generally happens.
It's so wrong you refuse to address any reason given. The US Libertarians are punitive, and have no problem spending on socialist prisons and military. US Libertarians are spiteful socialists, which is "conservative" in US speak.
#2, so Texas, who joined the US in 1846, after being the Republic of Texas from 1836 to 1846, joined the Confederacy in 1861 without ever having been in the US?
Yes, they want to eliminate government interference in our lives, yet the last time I looked the LP was officially anti-choice and supported oppression by corporations. We don't have rights, we just have limitations on government.
A hybrid system, with a self-signed everything, but with 3rd party verification. Preferably by an organization that's not financially dependent on the issuance of certificates. An ICANN/IANA like group, one per country, to certify the certificates come from the self-signer they come from. If the root DNS servers held certificates as well, like a DNSSEC setup for certs per domain, we could distribute, yet mostly trust the whole thing, right?
The 1896 realignment mostly switched the parties. Yes, the Republicans were the left party in the 1800s, but they were the right party in the 1900s. So mentions of the Republicans prior to 1896 is a little silly. You may as well be talking about the Whigs
Slashdot Mirror
So the death threats and threats of rape and such are "criticism"?
Yes, you believe only what supports your personal opinion, regardless of what the truth is. But that doesn't change reality. It only makes you wrong.
Nope, we care about all of them, but the US double standard is the only one applicable in this thread.
You said "citation", you didn't specify which thing you wanted specified.
I gave a dismissive and irrelevant answer because if you are too stupid to know reality, you are too stupid to accept it were I to present a 500 page research paper with 500 proper citations. So "citations needed" is proof of the citation requestor's idiocy, not any deficiency in the original poster.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I agree that most rich CEOs weren't in the military, Silver Spoon upper class like Donald Trump were draft dodgers, and didn't serve, sending others to die for their Right for Profit. But some did actually serve.
"Do you have any bias against testimony by police officers?" was one of the explicit questions asked when I last served. It was one of the few they asked everyone in the court room, before the indicidual selection started. But each area does their selection differently
"Do you have any bias against testimony by police officers?" was one of the explicit questions asked when I last served.
Oh, because I've seen some complaints (here and elsewhere) about the reparations for concentration camps in WWII for funny looking US citizens, at least some of whom are still alive. http://allegiancemusical.com/ one of which is currently starring in an autobiographical story about it.
She should have had to serve the time of all of her victims x 3. She got off way too easily.
And what "punishment" for a system that has allowed a single person to screw up 50,000 or so cases? The system is fine. It fucks the poor. It fucks the minorities. It fucks the people we don't like. So keep the system the way it is, and replace the broken cog in the broken machine, and let the broken machine still pump out bad results.
And 3x the time of the victims is a silly sentence. Let's say every conviction (some wrongly, some rightly) were 1 year (some shorter, some longer), that's 34,000 (current estimate, could be more) years in prison. That's purely symbolic and does nothing to prevent this from happening again, nor make any of the tainted convictions right.
What would you do with the victims of her crimes?
But righting a wrong after it happens is called "reparations" and isn't allowed in the US. Or is it only hated so strongly because we end up owing them primarily to non-white people?
And the rest should be there.
And you'd have to commit perjury to get on a jury, with beliefs like that.
The people of the US don't hate China. The people of the US can't even find it on a map. The people of the US only hate because the few zealots claim the Jews are the source of all their country's problems, and a vote for the National Socialist Worker's Party is the only way to stay safe and keep the American Way of life.
I love how having a veteran at the top who is a member of a political party makes them a government stooges in China, but the US asserts the same in a US company shouldn't be held against it on the international stage.
The US, home of double standards.
Such things are easier if you copy an existing standard. DCS (Domain Certificate Service), modeled after DNSSEC with certs handed out, rather then DNS resolution. Then all you need is to get BIND or Infoblox or someone to buy in, and you'll get a large organization pushing it for you. A for-profit company like Infoblox or Men and Mice may jump at the opportunity to be the "first and only" at a new security feature. And once you have them pushing for you, it's easier.
The vast majority of the natives (or, if you prefer, land bridge immigrants, since nobody was actually native to North America)
By that definition of native and immigrant, there are no natives, except a few Africans. If you got there before anyone else, it's not immigration, it's settlement. Though that word is misused when people settle in inhabited areas.
A quick look of the Our Lady of Mercy and I must know nothing about maritime law. It was a wreck lost in Portuguese water sailing from South America to Spain. Why wouldn't the look be kept by those who found it? That's what generally happens.
You are looking at the wrong numbers. A black adult with no criminal record is no more likely to commit a crime than a white person.
If you put all convicted criminals in prison for life, what would the crime rate be?
It's so wrong you refuse to address any reason given. The US Libertarians are punitive, and have no problem spending on socialist prisons and military. US Libertarians are spiteful socialists, which is "conservative" in US speak.
#2, so Texas, who joined the US in 1846, after being the Republic of Texas from 1836 to 1846, joined the Confederacy in 1861 without ever having been in the US?
Yes, they want to eliminate government interference in our lives, yet the last time I looked the LP was officially anti-choice and supported oppression by corporations. We don't have rights, we just have limitations on government.
A hybrid system, with a self-signed everything, but with 3rd party verification. Preferably by an organization that's not financially dependent on the issuance of certificates. An ICANN/IANA like group, one per country, to certify the certificates come from the self-signer they come from. If the root DNS servers held certificates as well, like a DNSSEC setup for certs per domain, we could distribute, yet mostly trust the whole thing, right?
Well, the discussion was between central CAs and self-signing.
What do you see the choices as?
The irony is that terms like "rape apologist" are then used to justify harassing the person that stated it.
And that's why you should never apologize for rape.
The 1896 realignment mostly switched the parties. Yes, the Republicans were the left party in the 1800s, but they were the right party in the 1900s. So mentions of the Republicans prior to 1896 is a little silly. You may as well be talking about the Whigs
Except that the center in the US is the hard right everywhere else.