So, not a mandatory vote place. If you want to go through the motions of voting, but not cast a valid vote, they won't stop you. And a guy with a hidden pen can spoil all the votes for the "other guy" when the box is opened.
Where are you? It's common in the US to have your ballot pass through a vote-counter before being put in the ballot. If the ballot is spoiled, it rejects it and you must re-vote. No person checks.
That you don't know, but assume the worst indicates you are here to argue, not discuss.
The ways the rules work, the person on the ballot nominates their electors before the election. If you aren't on the ballot, then you have no electors, despite vote law requiring it. I expect there will be years of lawsuits if a 3rd party were to ever win an electoral vote, as there's no mechanism for someone to appoint electors after the election. Or is there?
I just went and marked both candidates, making the ballot invalid.
I've lived in two mandatory voting places. One required you cast a valid ballot. The other required you sign the voter roll on vote day. So your tactic would have been illegal in one, but for the other, you could sign in, and then walk away without ever picking up a ballot or voting.
OEM is not tied to anything. You can buy an OEM copy with a Hard drive (I think that's the minimum to define a computer, if not now, then once upon a time). It won't be pre-installed or "tied" to anything. You can then take that OEM and install it as an "illegal" upgrade on a different system. I've done that myself, so I know it works.
And when trying to stop things like that, MS has blocked actual legal use according to their license terms.
Those examples are about someone talking about an actual crime. Suicide isn't a crime, so my example is mentioning a non-crime and being arrested for it. And I think that telling the police you are planning on taking a dump in the middle of the golden gate bridge would get you ignored. Throwing a rock isn't legal. It's vandalism or assault. Your logic is so absurd you are arguing that murder is legal because shooting a gun at a range is legal, so shooting a person is legal.
You are a bad person. You don't discuss, you argue because you like attention. I like the truth, and discussion. Fuck off.
United States: In the past, many states had laws that regarded the act of suicide as a felony, but these laws were seldom enforced. In the 1980s, 30 out of 50 United States has no laws opposing suicide or attempting suicide. With that said, all 50 states had laws stating that assisted suicide is a felony. Currently there is no law against the act of committing suicide in the United States.
Yes, there's no law against it, but mentioning it gets you arrested and detained. Perfectly legal.
In Europe, hailing a cab is easy, and at least as safe as the US (at least for the western part).
Uber/Lyft are perhaps a bit safer concerning the people involved, but there ARE risks. Drivers are NOT trained or licensed, equipment is NOT inspected and you don't know if that driver that picks you up isn't some serial killer looking for the next victim, just drank a 5th, or just is out looking for a few bucks.
You don't know any of that with the licensed taxis either. You are asserting that a barrier to entry will drive off the bad ones. Yes, I've seen that asserted many times, but I've never seen protectionism of a industry be a good thing for the users. With the apps, you get reviews and ratings. When you call in for a taxi pickup, you have *fewer* protections.
So it should be illegal to plan or attempt suicide, but legal to succeed? After all, nobody has been prosecuted for successfully committing suicide, have they?
Everything they have that's home-oriented is unsupported. What do you get with a full-retail license purchase? One call, but only so long as it's within 90 days?
The enterprise market is unaffected. They mostly are on subscription contracts with free upgrades anyway.
I have a full-XP license copied off a retail box. It's installed on one computer in the world. While that computer was dead, I tried to use it on a different computer. It came up as "not valid". an hour on the phone, and they still hadn't offered me a new key. How long must one yell at them to get a new key when they report a valid one as invalid?
And lifetime licenses expire. I have an XP license I "stole" from an old computer being thrown away. It wasn't OEM, but was a full license. I tried activating it with MS for a new install, and the activation failed. I called MS and they said that the license was not valid. And when they expire them, there's no discussion. It's just dead. Forever. And no, it wasn't from a licensing contract or such that expires. It was a full-retail purchase, expired by MS, for reasons unknown.
A lot of those built on a budget use something like Squid as the reverse proxy/load balancer. SSL on that will destroy your performance. Sure, if you bought $1,000,000 of F5 for your RP/LB, you could turn on SSL and not lose much. But then you probably way over-paid when you bought them in the first place. And hope you didn't buy an actual load balancer. Brocade ServerIron (or whatever they are calling their acquisitions from Foundry) is the best bang for the buck for performance for load balancing. About 1/100th the price of F5, but no features. You can't turn on SSL on the Brocade.
So yes, you could turn on SSL on your RP/LB, but only if you bought the wrong thing or way overpaid.
They have a careers subpage. I would be willing to bet its got a form or two, and that's *very* personal info.
http://www.nhtsa.gov/Jobs has no login at all I could see. Most sites like that will deep-link to https://www.usajobs.gov/ which is secured-only. Seems to do pretty well at it today, but no reason to not turn on SSL for the sites with no personal information.
There's almost no reason to not default to HTTP for everything. There's no reason to not just encrypt it, even for static pages.
There is absolutely no reason to use HTTP for anything. Encrypting the connection costs very little, prevents you from having stupid mistakes by not encrypting things that need to be, and provides enhanced privacy to things you may not realize that person is sensitive on. There's no reason NOT to make HTTPS everywhere.
Yup, that's what I said. The only reason not to is if you have a very popular web site with only static content. SSL on that will drain resources for minimal gain.
Script kiddie can easily break your HTTP with a MITM. DNS hijacking, and other means, essentially undetectable when you are unencrypted. But encrypted, redirecting you won't help, unless you perform bad user actions. HTTPS will (in nearly all cases) report a problem if someone were to hijack your DNS or perform common MITM attacks.
I couldn't find a login there, though it doesn't have any personal information or data on it. Just statistics and articles. But putting in your email to subscribe is in plaintext.
There's almost no reason to not default to HTTP for everything. There's no reason to not just encrypt it, even for static pages. No real benefit, but no real loss either.
Except it is. Because if you never play a game, why are you buying a gaming card? And games that care about FPS are more alike than the artificial tests that measure the pipeline bandwidth, or refresh speed in a way that doesn't correlate with actual game play. Whether you are playing CS or something else doesn't matter that it's a useful standard. And I've not seen any tests that correlate better with actual gameplay across cards, makers, and different games than FoC.
The person who told the state trooper who responded "Yeah, I saw him and changed lanes into him, he should have gotten out of my way." No ticket, despite a confession to assault (among other things).
Isn't the point of the fine, to enforce the concept of SAFETY?
When the penalty for a "crime" is so small as to not cause harm, why would anyone bother to follow the law? So yes, the point of a fine is safety, which is why it needs to be indexed to wealth/income to have any effect.
So you'll want to test a number of prospective egg donors for the most/best mitochondria, and use that. So there'll still be some "breeding" in cloning.
And yes, we are at the point where males are no longer "required" for reproducing. But not to the point where women aren't required. For all larger mammalian species I'm aware of.
Nut the thoroughbred rules don't allow cloning, or "other" artificial methods. Some of this is to stop some early practices like banking lots of sperm, then turn him into a gelding, and race him. If he's popular, you can breed him from the banked sperm.
Slashdot Mirror
So, not a mandatory vote place. If you want to go through the motions of voting, but not cast a valid vote, they won't stop you. And a guy with a hidden pen can spoil all the votes for the "other guy" when the box is opened.
Where are you? It's common in the US to have your ballot pass through a vote-counter before being put in the ballot. If the ballot is spoiled, it rejects it and you must re-vote. No person checks.
That you don't know, but assume the worst indicates you are here to argue, not discuss.
The ways the rules work, the person on the ballot nominates their electors before the election. If you aren't on the ballot, then you have no electors, despite vote law requiring it. I expect there will be years of lawsuits if a 3rd party were to ever win an electoral vote, as there's no mechanism for someone to appoint electors after the election. Or is there?
I just went and marked both candidates, making the ballot invalid.
I've lived in two mandatory voting places. One required you cast a valid ballot. The other required you sign the voter roll on vote day. So your tactic would have been illegal in one, but for the other, you could sign in, and then walk away without ever picking up a ballot or voting.
OEM is not tied to anything. You can buy an OEM copy with a Hard drive (I think that's the minimum to define a computer, if not now, then once upon a time). It won't be pre-installed or "tied" to anything. You can then take that OEM and install it as an "illegal" upgrade on a different system. I've done that myself, so I know it works.
And when trying to stop things like that, MS has blocked actual legal use according to their license terms.
Those examples are about someone talking about an actual crime. Suicide isn't a crime, so my example is mentioning a non-crime and being arrested for it. And I think that telling the police you are planning on taking a dump in the middle of the golden gate bridge would get you ignored. Throwing a rock isn't legal. It's vandalism or assault. Your logic is so absurd you are arguing that murder is legal because shooting a gun at a range is legal, so shooting a person is legal.
You are a bad person. You don't discuss, you argue because you like attention. I like the truth, and discussion. Fuck off.
United States: In the past, many states had laws that regarded the act of suicide as a felony, but these laws were seldom enforced. In the 1980s, 30 out of 50 United States has no laws opposing suicide or attempting suicide. With that said, all 50 states had laws stating that assisted suicide is a felony. Currently there is no law against the act of committing suicide in the United States.
Yes, there's no law against it, but mentioning it gets you arrested and detained. Perfectly legal.
Uber/Lyft are perhaps a bit safer concerning the people involved, but there ARE risks. Drivers are NOT trained or licensed, equipment is NOT inspected and you don't know if that driver that picks you up isn't some serial killer looking for the next victim, just drank a 5th, or just is out looking for a few bucks.
You don't know any of that with the licensed taxis either. You are asserting that a barrier to entry will drive off the bad ones. Yes, I've seen that asserted many times, but I've never seen protectionism of a industry be a good thing for the users. With the apps, you get reviews and ratings. When you call in for a taxi pickup, you have *fewer* protections.
So it should be illegal to plan or attempt suicide, but legal to succeed? After all, nobody has been prosecuted for successfully committing suicide, have they?
Everything they have that's home-oriented is unsupported. What do you get with a full-retail license purchase? One call, but only so long as it's within 90 days?
The enterprise market is unaffected. They mostly are on subscription contracts with free upgrades anyway.
I have a full-XP license copied off a retail box. It's installed on one computer in the world. While that computer was dead, I tried to use it on a different computer. It came up as "not valid". an hour on the phone, and they still hadn't offered me a new key. How long must one yell at them to get a new key when they report a valid one as invalid?
And lifetime licenses expire. I have an XP license I "stole" from an old computer being thrown away. It wasn't OEM, but was a full license. I tried activating it with MS for a new install, and the activation failed. I called MS and they said that the license was not valid. And when they expire them, there's no discussion. It's just dead. Forever. And no, it wasn't from a licensing contract or such that expires. It was a full-retail purchase, expired by MS, for reasons unknown.
A lot of those built on a budget use something like Squid as the reverse proxy/load balancer. SSL on that will destroy your performance. Sure, if you bought $1,000,000 of F5 for your RP/LB, you could turn on SSL and not lose much. But then you probably way over-paid when you bought them in the first place. And hope you didn't buy an actual load balancer. Brocade ServerIron (or whatever they are calling their acquisitions from Foundry) is the best bang for the buck for performance for load balancing. About 1/100th the price of F5, but no features. You can't turn on SSL on the Brocade.
So yes, you could turn on SSL on your RP/LB, but only if you bought the wrong thing or way overpaid.
They have a careers subpage. I would be willing to bet its got a form or two, and that's *very* personal info.
http://www.nhtsa.gov/Jobs has no login at all I could see. Most sites like that will deep-link to https://www.usajobs.gov/ which is secured-only. Seems to do pretty well at it today, but no reason to not turn on SSL for the sites with no personal information.
There's almost no reason to not default to HTTP for everything. There's no reason to not just encrypt it, even for static pages.
There is absolutely no reason to use HTTP for anything. Encrypting the connection costs very little, prevents you from having stupid mistakes by not encrypting things that need to be, and provides enhanced privacy to things you may not realize that person is sensitive on. There's no reason NOT to make HTTPS everywhere.
Yup, that's what I said. The only reason not to is if you have a very popular web site with only static content. SSL on that will drain resources for minimal gain.
What about Yahoo, isn't that what Palin used as governor? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
Script kiddie can easily break your HTTP with a MITM. DNS hijacking, and other means, essentially undetectable when you are unencrypted. But encrypted, redirecting you won't help, unless you perform bad user actions. HTTPS will (in nearly all cases) report a problem if someone were to hijack your DNS or perform common MITM attacks.
http://www.nhtsa.gov/
I couldn't find a login there, though it doesn't have any personal information or data on it. Just statistics and articles. But putting in your email to subscribe is in plaintext.
There's almost no reason to not default to HTTP for everything. There's no reason to not just encrypt it, even for static pages. No real benefit, but no real loss either.
Except it is. Because if you never play a game, why are you buying a gaming card? And games that care about FPS are more alike than the artificial tests that measure the pipeline bandwidth, or refresh speed in a way that doesn't correlate with actual game play. Whether you are playing CS or something else doesn't matter that it's a useful standard. And I've not seen any tests that correlate better with actual gameplay across cards, makers, and different games than FoC.
Police for profit is worst in the US, so just because the fines are higher elsewhere, doesn't mean the abuses are bad as well.
The guy who rear-ended me, however, did.
The person who told the state trooper who responded "Yeah, I saw him and changed lanes into him, he should have gotten out of my way." No ticket, despite a confession to assault (among other things).
Isn't the point of the fine, to enforce the concept of SAFETY?
When the penalty for a "crime" is so small as to not cause harm, why would anyone bother to follow the law? So yes, the point of a fine is safety, which is why it needs to be indexed to wealth/income to have any effect.
Name one peace-time project in which a 100% death toll was a certainty form the get-go.
Birth. 100% mortality rate.
But does anyone actually call it a mobile phone? I hear the Australians call it a "mow-bile", without saying phone.
So you'll want to test a number of prospective egg donors for the most/best mitochondria, and use that. So there'll still be some "breeding" in cloning.
And yes, we are at the point where males are no longer "required" for reproducing. But not to the point where women aren't required. For all larger mammalian species I'm aware of.
Nut the thoroughbred rules don't allow cloning, or "other" artificial methods. Some of this is to stop some early practices like banking lots of sperm, then turn him into a gelding, and race him. If he's popular, you can breed him from the banked sperm.
I always used different A/V on the servers from the PCs. More than once it caught something on one it didn't on the other.