I don't believe Kylo. There is a story behind Rey's origins.
Obviously. And Since Snoke was re-writing Kylo and Rey's minds at will from light-years away, there's no reason that the vision Kylo had wasn't a lie planted by Snoke.
Sometimes, it feels like the time between movies is to let the creators read all the fan theories, then pick the ones they like, use those, then drop hints that the others are true, as red herrings.
The movie, as a stand-alone movie, is absolutely unwatchable. The Empire, as the second, was very watchable as a standalone movie, even if some things meant more if you had the background. But Last Jedi was a mess. Too long. Inconsistent style and tempo. Suspense through stupidity (the admiral not telling Poe the plan, so he would almost get his friends killed), and the entire dead-end infiltration plotline seemed like, after the script was written, someone demanded a mini-Rogue One inserted into the middle.
The direction wasn't bad, but the director was. He should have told the Producers to fuck themselves when they came in with those stupid suggestions and additions.
So 2003, isn't "modern"? The dictionary defines it as "relating to the present or recent times as opposed to the remote past." and that's the definition I was using.
You are completely missing the point. Earth panels an only generate power when in sunlight. Space panels are outside the shadow of Earth, so they generate power almost all the time, and effectively increase the radius of the Earth, for power collection. Yes, put lots of panels on Earth, but in the 200 years that'll take, we'll solve the problems with space panels.
You are assuming we shadow the earth with LEO panels pointed away from Earth. That's the opposite of the reasonable discussions on it. If you collect power from the photons that have already missed the Earth, you have a massive net gain. I can't tell if you are an idiot, or deliberately obstructionist Luddite.
They are getting paid to tell you that you are inadequate. The monetization of everyhing is the problem. Before the printing press, you only got paid for physical work you did or the physical result of that physical work. Now every idiot with 2 followers can sell advertising.
Also, I've known some self-help people. Most don't drink their own kool-aid.
You are claiming that the sun is not predictable? What's the chance that it will go out between now and tomorrow morning? That rounds to 0%, which makes it 100% predictable.
If you are talking a battery-powered device, like a home UPS or the Tesla power station that this relates to, yes. You'd lose voltage, but not frequency.
With coal generators, they are big spinners locked to the frequency of the grid. If you draw more power, you increase the load on the generator, and they slow down. But the voltage isn't as greatly effected. If the grid every went 100% DC, then you'd see the effect as a drop of voltage. As there is no frequency, and probably no spinners in regular use, by the time we go all-DC.
That's what the Energy cabal fears. If everyone had rooftop solar and a battery (The size of a Tesla battery is fine, and that's much much smaller than a dunny), then there would be no need for central generation of base load.
Electricity grids are stacks of eggs balanced on their point. A single snow event taking out a single line in the US took out millions of people for days, in a very populated and "modern" area.
The Australian grid may have failed. The current was out of spec. If protection circuits activate, they'd shut down the grid. Tesla didn't fill all the missing need, but injected enough power in an "our of spec" event to ensure the grid couldn't fail from that event.
That small boost may have saved a major catastrophe. We may never know. But that it could is a great proof of concept. Battery-based storage can react faster than anything else on the grid, to smooth grid failures to prevent cascades. Now we know, we need them all over the US, before the next snowstorm in the North East.
If you inject 7.3MW at 49.8 Hz, the 49.8 goes to 50.
You have physical generators. Big spinners. As the current draw increases, they slow down from the load. So if you give more power at the frequency the big spinners are actually moving at at that moment, then you'll speed them back up to the desired 50 Hz.
1. The story wasn't a lie. 2. Retractions of true stories are given all the time, and are the reason nobody listens to them. 3. The presence of absence of this particular story is irrelevant. It didn't change a single person's mind. Those that hate Donnie John will do so without the story, and those who believes his poo is solid gold won't change their minds either.
So all the fake outrage is fake. The story is real.
The real problem is that real news is called fake.
There is a real memo from (arguably) "the Trump Administration" that lists those words to "avoid". The Right Wing Media re-writes the story to "Donald Trump personally band 7 words at CDC" then spreads the news. Anyone who picks up the fake news by the Far Right is slammed for reporting real news with a political slant.
The truth is that the CDC was requested to adjust wording in budget reports. That's real. That's verified. That's been lost in the Fake News spread by the Right Wing biased Conservative Media. We aren't even allowed to discuss that, as the Nazi Apologists claim it's spreading False News to discuss the truth that the Nazi Apologists doesn't like.
That article is 4 years old. Where I work, the CEO wanted a CEO spot, but no CEO before him had ever allowed for reserved spots, except for building visitors, and inconvenient spots for fleet vehicles. So he put in two EV stations. For nearly 1/10th of your outdated article's numbers. Yes, the exact numbers were published. It was in the shareholder report, as part of the "sustainable practices" they do. He's the only one that ever uses the spot. Parks there all day. I imagine he doesn't even need to plug in at home.
It'll be free. They "give away" a table inside for free, with water, light and such. So just do the same with the spots outside. If they want business, they'll provide charging ports.
Not needed. If they disconnect automatically, you just need an auto-disconnect and retractable hose, both are solved problems. That you think of Rube Goldberg for any problem doesn't indicate it's a reasonable solution.
This is a solved problem with laundry. If you need a drier, and all are taken, but some have completed the cycle, it's acceptable to take the clothes out and put them in the hamper on the drier, and put yours in.
Having a single charging station serve two spots, when one is done, someone can pull into the other slot, then move the charger themselves. When the first driver gets back he's charged and ready to go.
If you don't want anyone touching your car, don't be a douche, move your car when done.
There is empirical evidence that deflation is destructive to a modern economy. So inflation isn't there to cause all the destruction you claim it does, but to be a buffer for swings not landing into "deflation" range.
If you get deflation, Bob will sell his stocks and put the money under his mattress, when he does that, the stock price will drop, so everyone else will see that stocks are worse than selling and putting the cash under their mattress. Repeat until the stock market is $0, then we have a recession that would make the Great Depression look like a stock boom.
But yes, inflation is a tax on those who don't have massive debt. I'm surprised Donnie John hasn't tried to make inflation take off. If you buy a building for $1B, financing 150% of it, you are $500M in the red. If inflation makes that building worth $10B, then you are $8.5B in the black. Since most "rich" people have as much or more debt as assets, inflation does disproportionately benefit them. But it doesn't seem to be a target because not only does it benefit you for past purchases, it eliminates future ones, until the inflation comes back down.
horribly centralized is a good thing. The reason "cryptocurrency" will never take off is that it can't be easily controlled. Nation states require monetary policy. Also, 1% inflation is "good" for the economy. If the main currency were deflationary, as bitcoin is, the economy would crash. Also, bitcoin burns electricity like a small country. A small country would need 100% of power generation going into a crypto currency to ensure it was stable.
There are thousands of reasons why bitcoin will never be used as a currency replacement. And even more ACs who will complain when any of those massive failures are addressed.
Congress is the DC government. They just delegate to subordinates with a structure and titles similar to regular cities, so I can see how you are confused, but you need to go read the Constitution about DC again.
Having each state regulate the airspace differently would be absurd.
Yeah, it's not like there are different traffic laws for road users in each state. And a drone is inherently intrastate, so shouldn't be subject to interstate regulations.
Slashdot Mirror
No. Do you think Hillary's failings negates foreign influence over US elections?
There will be another election. Why do you want an election system dominated by foreign interests?
When so much advertising is pay per view, it's silly that the statistics still only count clicks.
I don't believe Kylo. There is a story behind Rey's origins.
Obviously. And Since Snoke was re-writing Kylo and Rey's minds at will from light-years away, there's no reason that the vision Kylo had wasn't a lie planted by Snoke.
Sometimes, it feels like the time between movies is to let the creators read all the fan theories, then pick the ones they like, use those, then drop hints that the others are true, as red herrings.
The movie, as a stand-alone movie, is absolutely unwatchable. The Empire, as the second, was very watchable as a standalone movie, even if some things meant more if you had the background. But Last Jedi was a mess. Too long. Inconsistent style and tempo. Suspense through stupidity (the admiral not telling Poe the plan, so he would almost get his friends killed), and the entire dead-end infiltration plotline seemed like, after the script was written, someone demanded a mini-Rogue One inserted into the middle.
The direction wasn't bad, but the director was. He should have told the Producers to fuck themselves when they came in with those stupid suggestions and additions.
So 2003, isn't "modern"? The dictionary defines it as "relating to the present or recent times as opposed to the remote past." and that's the definition I was using.
You are completely missing the point. Earth panels an only generate power when in sunlight. Space panels are outside the shadow of Earth, so they generate power almost all the time, and effectively increase the radius of the Earth, for power collection. Yes, put lots of panels on Earth, but in the 200 years that'll take, we'll solve the problems with space panels.
You are assuming we shadow the earth with LEO panels pointed away from Earth. That's the opposite of the reasonable discussions on it. If you collect power from the photons that have already missed the Earth, you have a massive net gain. I can't tell if you are an idiot, or deliberately obstructionist Luddite.
Lean 1st grade grammar. "and" is the word to pay attention to.
They are getting paid to tell you that you are inadequate. The monetization of everyhing is the problem. Before the printing press, you only got paid for physical work you did or the physical result of that physical work. Now every idiot with 2 followers can sell advertising.
Also, I've known some self-help people. Most don't drink their own kool-aid.
You are claiming that the sun is not predictable? What's the chance that it will go out between now and tomorrow morning? That rounds to 0%, which makes it 100% predictable.
If you are talking a battery-powered device, like a home UPS or the Tesla power station that this relates to, yes. You'd lose voltage, but not frequency.
With coal generators, they are big spinners locked to the frequency of the grid. If you draw more power, you increase the load on the generator, and they slow down. But the voltage isn't as greatly effected. If the grid every went 100% DC, then you'd see the effect as a drop of voltage. As there is no frequency, and probably no spinners in regular use, by the time we go all-DC.
That's what the Energy cabal fears. If everyone had rooftop solar and a battery (The size of a Tesla battery is fine, and that's much much smaller than a dunny), then there would be no need for central generation of base load.
Electricity grids are stacks of eggs balanced on their point. A single snow event taking out a single line in the US took out millions of people for days, in a very populated and "modern" area.
The Australian grid may have failed. The current was out of spec. If protection circuits activate, they'd shut down the grid. Tesla didn't fill all the missing need, but injected enough power in an "our of spec" event to ensure the grid couldn't fail from that event.
That small boost may have saved a major catastrophe. We may never know. But that it could is a great proof of concept. Battery-based storage can react faster than anything else on the grid, to smooth grid failures to prevent cascades. Now we know, we need them all over the US, before the next snowstorm in the North East.
If you inject 7.3MW at 49.8 Hz, the 49.8 goes to 50.
You have physical generators. Big spinners. As the current draw increases, they slow down from the load. So if you give more power at the frequency the big spinners are actually moving at at that moment, then you'll speed them back up to the desired 50 Hz.
Space Array:
No night, no clouds. 100% predictable.
1. The story wasn't a lie.
2. Retractions of true stories are given all the time, and are the reason nobody listens to them.
3. The presence of absence of this particular story is irrelevant. It didn't change a single person's mind. Those that hate Donnie John will do so without the story, and those who believes his poo is solid gold won't change their minds either.
So all the fake outrage is fake. The story is real.
The real problem is that real news is called fake.
There is a real memo from (arguably) "the Trump Administration" that lists those words to "avoid". The Right Wing Media re-writes the story to "Donald Trump personally band 7 words at CDC" then spreads the news. Anyone who picks up the fake news by the Far Right is slammed for reporting real news with a political slant.
The truth is that the CDC was requested to adjust wording in budget reports. That's real. That's verified. That's been lost in the Fake News spread by the Right Wing biased Conservative Media. We aren't even allowed to discuss that, as the Nazi Apologists claim it's spreading False News to discuss the truth that the Nazi Apologists doesn't like.
That article is 4 years old. Where I work, the CEO wanted a CEO spot, but no CEO before him had ever allowed for reserved spots, except for building visitors, and inconvenient spots for fleet vehicles. So he put in two EV stations. For nearly 1/10th of your outdated article's numbers. Yes, the exact numbers were published. It was in the shareholder report, as part of the "sustainable practices" they do. He's the only one that ever uses the spot. Parks there all day. I imagine he doesn't even need to plug in at home.
It'll be free. They "give away" a table inside for free, with water, light and such. So just do the same with the spots outside. If they want business, they'll provide charging ports.
Have they perfected the robot snake yet?
Not needed. If they disconnect automatically, you just need an auto-disconnect and retractable hose, both are solved problems. That you think of Rube Goldberg for any problem doesn't indicate it's a reasonable solution.
This is a solved problem with laundry. If you need a drier, and all are taken, but some have completed the cycle, it's acceptable to take the clothes out and put them in the hamper on the drier, and put yours in.
Having a single charging station serve two spots, when one is done, someone can pull into the other slot, then move the charger themselves. When the first driver gets back he's charged and ready to go.
If you don't want anyone touching your car, don't be a douche, move your car when done.
So My 4% fixed 30 year mortgage far exceeds 10% inflation? Your math is poor, and your logic non-existent.
There is empirical evidence that deflation is destructive to a modern economy. So inflation isn't there to cause all the destruction you claim it does, but to be a buffer for swings not landing into "deflation" range.
If you get deflation, Bob will sell his stocks and put the money under his mattress, when he does that, the stock price will drop, so everyone else will see that stocks are worse than selling and putting the cash under their mattress. Repeat until the stock market is $0, then we have a recession that would make the Great Depression look like a stock boom.
But yes, inflation is a tax on those who don't have massive debt. I'm surprised Donnie John hasn't tried to make inflation take off. If you buy a building for $1B, financing 150% of it, you are $500M in the red. If inflation makes that building worth $10B, then you are $8.5B in the black. Since most "rich" people have as much or more debt as assets, inflation does disproportionately benefit them. But it doesn't seem to be a target because not only does it benefit you for past purchases, it eliminates future ones, until the inflation comes back down.
horribly centralized is a good thing. The reason "cryptocurrency" will never take off is that it can't be easily controlled. Nation states require monetary policy. Also, 1% inflation is "good" for the economy. If the main currency were deflationary, as bitcoin is, the economy would crash. Also, bitcoin burns electricity like a small country. A small country would need 100% of power generation going into a crypto currency to ensure it was stable.
There are thousands of reasons why bitcoin will never be used as a currency replacement. And even more ACs who will complain when any of those massive failures are addressed.
Sar-chasm. The gap between you and the joke.
Congress is the DC government. They just delegate to subordinates with a structure and titles similar to regular cities, so I can see how you are confused, but you need to go read the Constitution about DC again.
Having each state regulate the airspace differently would be absurd.
Yeah, it's not like there are different traffic laws for road users in each state. And a drone is inherently intrastate, so shouldn't be subject to interstate regulations.