Recidivism is often caused by the conditions in (and after) prison. The better the conditions in prison, and lower prison sentences, the lower the recidivism rates. So the "tough on crime" people are making crime worse.
The supporters of the death penalty want the suffering as well, thus, both sides are against inert gas. Both want the suffering. One to watch the suffering, and the other to complain about it.
Because CO2 levels never rise, you never feel out of breadth or anything.
Sure you will. As you metabolize the O2 already in your blood, you'll build up CO2 in your lungs. As you die, the time to build up enough CO2 to generate the "need air" reflex will increase, but it will still build up, however slowly, until you are dead.
The paralytic is because they know the person is suffering, and would thrash/object if they could. An N2 OD is more painless. Asphyxia without high CO2 is surprisingly painless and simple. Morphine OD is a common assisted suicide method. Take off the caps on morphine, and let the person self-medicate to death. Most "assisted suicide" are just that. They help/allow suicide. What you are talking about is legalized euthanasia, which is different.
Why the need to kill them early? Leave them in prison until dead. Same result, except for the death penalty causing an early and painful death, purely for revenge. They are not shown to decrease crime,
At cruising altitude, a plane is hard to bring down. You generally need an air to air missile, or a bomb. Most Egyptian bombings happen leaving, not entering, because it's easier to breach security in Cairo than Paris. So if it is a bomb, it would be alarming that they were so successful. There would be almost nowhere that would be safe.
It's not that there's a brightness filter, but that the "light" side is labeled "beautiful" and the other side is "dirty Nigger". The slider is fine. The labels are overtly racist.
Suicide nets for a suicide rate less than the general population of the US.
I thought that you shouldn't prevent suicide by restricting access to the suicide methods. The NRA says that if you make suicide hard, it won't affect suicide rates.
There has only been one candidate to poll as 'hated' more than Hillary, and that was Donald. Neither is any good, but at least Hillary has held public office before, and is more qualified than Trump, even if more hated here because of her far-right leanings (as opposed to the general conservatives here that are ultra-far-right leanings).
If the issue is that the school system tells Blacks and Latinos that they should go into manual labor because they are too dumb to work a computer. Is that a problem? Should it be addressed? Does it matter if the person telling the minorities that they are inferior is private, not government.
There were millions of hits for my google search, so I just grabbed the top two. How many would you like, and why are you unable to use Google yourself?
Yeah, and that's why Christians are pushing for laws to force others to do what they want. Force against "undesirables" is the core tenet of American Christianity. So the primary difference between US Christianity and ISIS is definition of "undesirables".
Kidnapping and brainwashing is fine, so long at it's in the betterment of the lives of the "savages". By your logic, nothing ISIS does is wrong, so long as you claim their opponents are "savages".
I grew up in Texas, and gays weren't thrown off buildings. They were dragged behind pickups until dead. Something common until a provably straight guy was killed in that manner after being grabbed outside a gay bar in a misunderstanding. Then people became outraged and the practice was condemned and declined in use. How are "we" so much better for having done the same thing? Oh yeah, the standard answer to that is "no true Christian" when a Christian does it, and "all Muslim" when a Muslim does it.
Christians make up the KKK and lynch people they don't like. Christians killed millions in the Crusades. What, the problem is that they did it to us, which is wrong, but when we did it to them, it's not an issue? Yes, I know the standard "The massive pile of violence in Christian's history is long enough ago, I'll dismiss it" argument. I saw someone do a body count, and the Christians still hold the title of largest kills in the name of God (or some organization claiming allegiance to God). The modern ones are just the ones claiming nothing else matters, earlier than 9/11, or some other modern arbitrary date.
They did more damage to the US economy by using airplanes to take down the Twin Towers, than the damage done to the Twin Towers. This just proves it was an accident they were successful.
If they wanted to collapse the US economy, they should bomb 5 airports with bombs inside luggage that goes off in the scanner line. All 5 within 1 minute of each other spread around. Then, two weeks later, set off 5 more in the ticketing lines. Then, presuming the response is greater curb-side inspections, wait another few weeks and set off car bombs.
Attacking the security perimeter shows that the idea of a perimeter is the failure, and nobody will ever feel safe again. Random acts of terrorism that attacks the common person will do more. Hijack a pizza delivery guy and deliver a bomb instead. Nobody will order delivery food again, if they fear getting a bomb instead. The terror will cripple the US economy.
I re-checked the requirements. You are required to "have" ID and "present" ID when asked, but nobody is required to check it. As opposed to the US where I recall being checked for ID when checking in, when going through security, and inconsistently at the gate. So I must have ID on me, and may be asked to present it, but outside the US, I've never been asked to present it for domestic travel.
Slashdot Mirror
Recidivism is often caused by the conditions in (and after) prison. The better the conditions in prison, and lower prison sentences, the lower the recidivism rates. So the "tough on crime" people are making crime worse.
The supporters of the death penalty want the suffering as well, thus, both sides are against inert gas. Both want the suffering. One to watch the suffering, and the other to complain about it.
Because CO2 levels never rise, you never feel out of breadth or anything.
Sure you will. As you metabolize the O2 already in your blood, you'll build up CO2 in your lungs. As you die, the time to build up enough CO2 to generate the "need air" reflex will increase, but it will still build up, however slowly, until you are dead.
The paralytic is because they know the person is suffering, and would thrash/object if they could. An N2 OD is more painless. Asphyxia without high CO2 is surprisingly painless and simple. Morphine OD is a common assisted suicide method. Take off the caps on morphine, and let the person self-medicate to death. Most "assisted suicide" are just that. They help/allow suicide. What you are talking about is legalized euthanasia, which is different.
Why the need to kill them early? Leave them in prison until dead. Same result, except for the death penalty causing an early and painful death, purely for revenge. They are not shown to decrease crime,
Why do you assume it's easier to breach security in Cairo than in Paris?
TFA mentioned the tight security at CDG. Did you read TFA?
How many times over the past few years have we seen reports of "rioting youths" in Paris....
How does "rioting youths" relate to airport security?
At cruising altitude, a plane is hard to bring down. You generally need an air to air missile, or a bomb. Most Egyptian bombings happen leaving, not entering, because it's easier to breach security in Cairo than Paris. So if it is a bomb, it would be alarming that they were so successful. There would be almost nowhere that would be safe.
People have been trained to think lighter is more attractive.
It's not that there's a brightness filter, but that the "light" side is labeled "beautiful" and the other side is "dirty Nigger". The slider is fine. The labels are overtly racist.
If you take a long flight, and weather closes the remote airport, and you land at your takeoff airport, did you "travel" anywhere?
When my dog runs around in circles, people say he's fast, that he's moving, but nobody has yet indicated that he's "traveled" anywhere.
Suicide nets for a suicide rate less than the general population of the US.
I thought that you shouldn't prevent suicide by restricting access to the suicide methods. The NRA says that if you make suicide hard, it won't affect suicide rates.
So in the Fourth Crusade, when the Christians invaded, sieged, and sacked the city, Where were the Muslims?
There has only been one candidate to poll as 'hated' more than Hillary, and that was Donald. Neither is any good, but at least Hillary has held public office before, and is more qualified than Trump, even if more hated here because of her far-right leanings (as opposed to the general conservatives here that are ultra-far-right leanings).
If the issue is that the school system tells Blacks and Latinos that they should go into manual labor because they are too dumb to work a computer. Is that a problem? Should it be addressed? Does it matter if the person telling the minorities that they are inferior is private, not government.
So did you try to google and not find any, or did you not bother to look?
http://www.theguardian.com/wor...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
There were millions of hits for my google search, so I just grabbed the top two. How many would you like, and why are you unable to use Google yourself?
Yeah, and that's why Christians are pushing for laws to force others to do what they want. Force against "undesirables" is the core tenet of American Christianity. So the primary difference between US Christianity and ISIS is definition of "undesirables".
Kidnapping and brainwashing is fine, so long at it's in the betterment of the lives of the "savages". By your logic, nothing ISIS does is wrong, so long as you claim their opponents are "savages".
And the Crusade apologists rarely mention things like the Crusades sieged and sacked Christian cities, like Constantinople.
I grew up in Texas, and gays weren't thrown off buildings. They were dragged behind pickups until dead. Something common until a provably straight guy was killed in that manner after being grabbed outside a gay bar in a misunderstanding. Then people became outraged and the practice was condemned and declined in use. How are "we" so much better for having done the same thing? Oh yeah, the standard answer to that is "no true Christian" when a Christian does it, and "all Muslim" when a Muslim does it.
Christians make up the KKK and lynch people they don't like. Christians killed millions in the Crusades. What, the problem is that they did it to us, which is wrong, but when we did it to them, it's not an issue? Yes, I know the standard "The massive pile of violence in Christian's history is long enough ago, I'll dismiss it" argument. I saw someone do a body count, and the Christians still hold the title of largest kills in the name of God (or some organization claiming allegiance to God). The modern ones are just the ones claiming nothing else matters, earlier than 9/11, or some other modern arbitrary date.
Merit also includes parent's net value at your birth (a better gauge of success than intelligence or education).
They did more damage to the US economy by using airplanes to take down the Twin Towers, than the damage done to the Twin Towers. This just proves it was an accident they were successful.
If they wanted to collapse the US economy, they should bomb 5 airports with bombs inside luggage that goes off in the scanner line. All 5 within 1 minute of each other spread around. Then, two weeks later, set off 5 more in the ticketing lines. Then, presuming the response is greater curb-side inspections, wait another few weeks and set off car bombs.
Attacking the security perimeter shows that the idea of a perimeter is the failure, and nobody will ever feel safe again. Random acts of terrorism that attacks the common person will do more. Hijack a pizza delivery guy and deliver a bomb instead. Nobody will order delivery food again, if they fear getting a bomb instead. The terror will cripple the US economy.
I re-checked the requirements. You are required to "have" ID and "present" ID when asked, but nobody is required to check it. As opposed to the US where I recall being checked for ID when checking in, when going through security, and inconsistently at the gate. So I must have ID on me, and may be asked to present it, but outside the US, I've never been asked to present it for domestic travel.