Maybe we should drop the whole deal and vote on the back office people... put some term limits on staffers perhaps? Or find some way to make them do more than know the summary...
I know I wouldn't get too far if someone only gave me summaries of the projects I work on...
you're missing the point still... I live in WI, and the whole big deal isn't about kids having sex because they were told how to.
It's about that this would either say you can't teach ANYTHING (which would be legal) or if you teach abstinence, you MUST teach safe sex. If a teacher KNOWS that someone under 18 years old is having sex, it is a crime in WI and they are legally compelled to report it. If they do not, then they are in violation of the current law.
That is what the big deal is about, what is the new law of the day?
statutory rape WILL label you as a sex offender. If you are 18, and your girlfriend is 1 week from 18 and you get caught, if her parents want to press charges, even if she does not, then you are then a sex offender.
using the condom isn't the part he's talking about. He is talking about a teacher KNOWING that one or two people under 18 are having sex. THAT is statutory rape in WI, and the teacher knowing it and not reporting it IS a crime.
Telling them how to is contributing the the delinquency of a minor. That is what he is talking about. He wants the laws to be straightened out, and to NOT conflict.
hypothetically could it have been the Human Rights groups in China?
Yes it would be an odd move as it could put themselves and their friends in quite a bit of danger, but it could also be high reward, if other countries fall for it and do something about it (if they could)
I know it's bad to think about the victim as possible being the one who set things up, but from time to time we need to at least explore the idea, or you will get played repeatedly.
The criminals are the ones who will carry WITHOUT the permit...
Your friend's dad was obviously trying to follow the law by not carrying, and the guys upset with him have no concern about the law... which goes back to the whole idea that banning these readers makes no sense, because if a criminal is trying to steal your ID, they know that is already illegal, so why not just throw an illegal reader and an illegal gun on top of it?
Um no... the gun totin trigger happy people aren't the problem...
do you think criminals CARE if they are breaking the law? Do you think having a nationwide concealed carry law would make all gang members and others suddenly stop carrying until they got a permit?
If you do you are sadly mistaken... the ones who are regulated and don't carry are the law abiding people... Typically not the people you need to be worrying about. Typically.
Interesting... how could I integrate this with the bridge I just bought to bring synergy about to all of our team members in a way to allow our company to realize the opportunities we perceive in web 2.0??
but if he would have had the funding he needed... THEN, he probably would have still been crushed, but netscape could have died slower... (My parents still have it on their PC...)
I picked up an I-Pass but for purely financial reasons. I go to Chicago and Indianapolis, sometimes St Louis now and then, and Illinois made it half price for all I-pass users compared to cash, so between that and not haivng to stop is the only reason I got one.
The Tri state tollway has high fees and is constantly under construction...
They did the figures and in many states if you are a single mother with 3+ kids, you are better off not working at all. you make more than $20-$25 an hour this way, plus you don't have the stress of work.
We need to be responsible for taking care of ourselves, we need to have winners and losers in kids games, we need to have a benefit for working, we DESPERATELY need ways for someone to "get ahead" otherwise why work hard if it doesn't change what you walk away with?
You could be in Wisconsin... a few years back our genius governor raided our highway funds to pay for something that he raided their funds for, and now we are raiding other funds to make up for what should have been in the highway funds...
but "we must not, we can not, and I WILL NOT raise taxes." - Gov Jim Doyle just before raising every fee and tax he could think of.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe we should drop the whole deal and vote on the back office people... put some term limits on staffers perhaps? Or find some way to make them do more than know the summary...
I know I wouldn't get too far if someone only gave me summaries of the projects I work on...
unless he's an independent (and not just a democrat or republican who ran as an independent), I would say yes.
I wouldn't call them cities per say... savage nomads grouping together to brave the coming storm is probably more appropriate.
welcome to Wisconsin. If you are under 18, it IS statutory rape.
you're missing the point still... I live in WI, and the whole big deal isn't about kids having sex because they were told how to.
It's about that this would either say you can't teach ANYTHING (which would be legal) or if you teach abstinence, you MUST teach safe sex. If a teacher KNOWS that someone under 18 years old is having sex, it is a crime in WI and they are legally compelled to report it. If they do not, then they are in violation of the current law.
That is what the big deal is about, what is the new law of the day?
statutory rape WILL label you as a sex offender. If you are 18, and your girlfriend is 1 week from 18 and you get caught, if her parents want to press charges, even if she does not, then you are then a sex offender.
using the condom isn't the part he's talking about. He is talking about a teacher KNOWING that one or two people under 18 are having sex. THAT is statutory rape in WI, and the teacher knowing it and not reporting it IS a crime.
Telling them how to is contributing the the delinquency of a minor. That is what he is talking about. He wants the laws to be straightened out, and to NOT conflict.
So... Throwing this out there...
hypothetically could it have been the Human Rights groups in China?
Yes it would be an odd move as it could put themselves and their friends in quite a bit of danger, but it could also be high reward, if other countries fall for it and do something about it (if they could)
I know it's bad to think about the victim as possible being the one who set things up, but from time to time we need to at least explore the idea, or you will get played repeatedly.
I want to synergize!
Where can I pick one of these up to maximize the opportunities to leverage shiny things?
I really need to "Do the needful."
Hm... great idea... probably already taken though... an app that whenever you need someone to blame, it tells you who to blame...
probably would be blocked from the app store if Apple was one of the possible "to blames".
Wait... you gave Palm your SSN?!?
Why would a phone maker need that... I understand Sprint would ask because of credit, but Palm?
I remember the blisters my brother and I would get from the corners of those controllers... the rounded sides were SO much better...
oh yes, it DID happen. here's the link.
opencarry.org/wi.html
Better yet, move to WI!!!
at the current time, we allow unlicensed OPEN carry.
It's the way we are get around the pesky no concealed carry law...
it may not last long, and if a Milwaukee cop sees you, they will take you down first, then make sure you are ok to carry it, but it's legal for now...
The criminals are the ones who will carry WITHOUT the permit...
Your friend's dad was obviously trying to follow the law by not carrying, and the guys upset with him have no concern about the law... which goes back to the whole idea that banning these readers makes no sense, because if a criminal is trying to steal your ID, they know that is already illegal, so why not just throw an illegal reader and an illegal gun on top of it?
Um no... the gun totin trigger happy people aren't the problem...
do you think criminals CARE if they are breaking the law? Do you think having a nationwide concealed carry law would make all gang members and others suddenly stop carrying until they got a permit?
If you do you are sadly mistaken... the ones who are regulated and don't carry are the law abiding people... Typically not the people you need to be worrying about. Typically.
Surely we are smarter now than nature... we could just take over everything and tweek things as we need.
What could possibly go wrong?
So you see the problem... if he PREVENTS the next Katrina, was it REALLY the next Katrina? or will the one he DOESN'T prevent be the next one?
little full of yourself are we?
Interesting... how could I integrate this with the bridge I just bought to bring synergy about to all of our team members in a way to allow our company to realize the opportunities we perceive in web 2.0??
even though AOL wasn't really interested in the browser as much as the name...
This would be the bandwagon approach. Wait for something to happen, and jump on the next wagon, who cares if the wheels are about to fall off...
but if he would have had the funding he needed... THEN, he probably would have still been crushed, but netscape could have died slower... (My parents still have it on their PC...)
I picked up an I-Pass but for purely financial reasons. I go to Chicago and Indianapolis, sometimes St Louis now and then, and Illinois made it half price for all I-pass users compared to cash, so between that and not haivng to stop is the only reason I got one.
The Tri state tollway has high fees and is constantly under construction...
YES!
They did the figures and in many states if you are a single mother with 3+ kids, you are better off not working at all. you make more than $20-$25 an hour this way, plus you don't have the stress of work.
We need to be responsible for taking care of ourselves, we need to have winners and losers in kids games, we need to have a benefit for working, we DESPERATELY need ways for someone to "get ahead" otherwise why work hard if it doesn't change what you walk away with?
You could be in Wisconsin... a few years back our genius governor raided our highway funds to pay for something that he raided their funds for, and now we are raiding other funds to make up for what should have been in the highway funds...
but "we must not, we can not, and I WILL NOT raise taxes." - Gov Jim Doyle just before raising every fee and tax he could think of.