There were definitely tropical storms this year that either never would have been noticed or classified as such in 1933.
To point out a few:
The signs of the formation of the tropical depression that became TS Bret was noticed on satellite, and a hurricane hunter (WC-130, IIRC)just happened to be in the air to be sent out to verify it.
TS Gert was very similar; a short-lived Bay of Campeche storm.
Lee was a tropical storm for only one advisory cycle (six hours). The upgrade to tropical storm was based off satellite imagery, see the discussion
and so on...
Also compare the 1933 chart to the 2005 chart Note how nothing was noticed east of 45 West. While it is possible that '33 was just a 'close in' season, I wouldn't bet the house that there were no tropical storms out in the mid to eastern atlantic
Oh, and to clear up something that seems to be confusing some people... The practice of naming storms did not start until 1953 (1950, if you consider the phonetic alphabet to be names). However, meteorolgists tend to not be too literal when they talk about 'named storms'. That is, they will talk about how many named storms there were in 1933 even though storms weren't being named back then. In such cases, what is being referred to is the number of storms that attained tropical storm strength (storms that would have received a name had that been the practice).
Zeta is the latest a tropical cyclone was formed in the Atlantic, forming around 11 AM ET; this dethrones Hurricane Alice of 1954, which formed December 30th around 2 AM ET.
THE HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS THAT ALICE OFFICIALLY BECAME A TROPICAL
STORM AT 1200 UTC 30 DECEMBER 1954. MY WORKING BEST TRACK FOR ZETA
CURRENTLY SHOWS STORM STATUS BEGINNING AT 1200 UTC THIS MORNING...
WHICH TENTATIVELY ALLOWS ZETA TO TIE ALICE FOR THE LATEST FORMING
TROPICAL STORM IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN. HOWEVER...A CASE CAN BE MADE
FOR CONSIDERING ZETA A TROPICAL STORM AS EARLY AS 0600 UTC THIS
MORNING. WE'LL HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE FINAL ANALYSIS OF ZETA'S TRACK
TO SEE EXACTLY WHERE ITS FORMATION FALLS RELATIVE TO ALICE'S.
What is on a sixth grade standardized test standardized test that requires the functions on a TI-30? Why wouldn't a four function calculator (at half the cost)suffice?
It wasn't until Algebra I (seventh and eighth grade, ugh) that I needed something like it.
What I'm wondering is whether or not this includes the recent security fixes that brought about the release of 1.0.4. Would be pretty foolish of AOL to not include these since they are considered critical.
Oh, I dunno, pretty much every blogger out there will do so at some time another, while a non-trivial amount of them do so often each day.
I witnessed the phenomena described in the article a few days ago when I was drafting a post reviewing what has happened in Florida's US Senate race up to this point. All of my links to news articles referring to things that had occurred more than a month ago were St Petersburg Times articles. Why? Because they don't hide their old articles behind a pay-to-view archive.
If I have a choice between citing an article from a publication that keeps its articles free to view and one that does not, I will link to the free one every time (assuming of course there is reasonable similarity between the content and quality of the articles in question).
I am active in politics (volunter for campaigns, member of campus political organization, etc.)
I've never received unsolicited e-mail directly from any campaign, political committee, think tank, etc.
I do, however, receive at least a forward a day from my other politically active friends from one of the lists their subscribed to. And yes the incoming rate has increased substantially since the presidential campaign has started.
Like the article says "Sent out as links in e-mails, Web videos can easily be forwarded by the original recipients to scores of people, unlike direct mail that may end up in the trash."
The campaigns do not need to spam people directly, so they won't. It will be the campaigns followers who will do the spamming.
That's more than twice the number of ships currently in service.
Also, these are not precise locations. Yeah, you can find that the USS Roosevelt (DDG-80) is homeported in Mayport, Florida but you're not going to find the precise pier number.
As for ships on deployment, one can find their general locations just by looking at the latest issue of the Navy Times and by reading the newspaper of the town that the ship and its battlegroup are from.
The Navy really tightened up on what get's posted on official ship's websites after 9/11. If there is sensitive information still out there, Google is not at fault, but rather the unit's webmaster, Commanding Officer, and the Operational Security people who are supposed to be looking out for that sort of thing.
The question is were people stupid, or where they diehard Democrats who have never voted for a Republican in their life and weren't about to start now? (The only canidates in the race were Republicans.)
To this end a 'None of the above option' is going to be added for future elections.
There's another story about the matter in the Miami Herald today.
Slashdot Mirror
The signs of the formation of the tropical depression that became TS Bret was noticed on satellite, and a hurricane hunter (WC-130, IIRC)just happened to be in the air to be sent out to verify it.
TS Gert was very similar; a short-lived Bay of Campeche storm.
Ditto Jose
Lee was a tropical storm for only one advisory cycle (six hours). The upgrade to tropical storm was based off satellite imagery, see the discussion
and so on...
Also compare the 1933 chart to the 2005 chart Note how nothing was noticed east of 45 West. While it is possible that '33 was just a 'close in' season, I wouldn't bet the house that there were no tropical storms out in the mid to eastern atlantic
Oh, and to clear up something that seems to be confusing some people... The practice of naming storms did not start until 1953 (1950, if you consider the phonetic alphabet to be names). However, meteorolgists tend to not be too literal when they talk about 'named storms'. That is, they will talk about how many named storms there were in 1933 even though storms weren't being named back then. In such cases, what is being referred to is the number of storms that attained tropical storm strength (storms that would have received a name had that been the practice).
What is on a sixth grade standardized test standardized test that requires the functions on a TI-30? Why wouldn't a four function calculator (at half the cost)suffice? It wasn't until Algebra I (seventh and eighth grade, ugh) that I needed something like it.
According to Ben Goodger, Netscape 8 exhibits the Cross Site Scripting flaw that was fixed for Firefox 1.0.4.
They signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty before backing out of it in January of 2003. Put simply, signatories to the treaty (that did not already have nuclear weapons)agreed not to produce nuclear weapons.
I witnessed the phenomena described in the article a few days ago when I was drafting a post reviewing what has happened in Florida's US Senate race up to this point. All of my links to news articles referring to things that had occurred more than a month ago were St Petersburg Times articles. Why? Because they don't hide their old articles behind a pay-to-view archive.
If I have a choice between citing an article from a publication that keeps its articles free to view and one that does not, I will link to the free one every time (assuming of course there is reasonable similarity between the content and quality of the articles in question).
I am active in politics (volunter for campaigns, member of campus political organization, etc.)
I've never received unsolicited e-mail directly from any campaign, political committee, think tank, etc.
I do, however, receive at least a forward a day from my other politically active friends from one of the lists their subscribed to. And yes the incoming rate has increased substantially since the presidential campaign has started.
Like the article says "Sent out as links in e-mails, Web videos can easily be forwarded by the original recipients to scores of people, unlike direct mail that may end up in the trash."
The campaigns do not need to spam people directly, so they won't. It will be the campaigns followers who will do the spamming.
Also, these are not precise locations. Yeah, you can find that the USS Roosevelt (DDG-80) is homeported in Mayport, Florida but you're not going to find the precise pier number.
As for ships on deployment, one can find their general locations just by looking at the latest issue of the Navy Times and by reading the newspaper of the town that the ship and its battlegroup are from.
The Navy really tightened up on what get's posted on official ship's websites after 9/11. If there is sensitive information still out there, Google is not at fault, but rather the unit's webmaster, Commanding Officer, and the Operational Security people who are supposed to be looking out for that sort of thing.
The question is were people stupid, or where they diehard Democrats who have never voted for a Republican in their life and weren't about to start now? (The only canidates in the race were Republicans.) To this end a 'None of the above option' is going to be added for future elections. There's another story about the matter in the Miami Herald today.