Slashdot Mirror


User: dolphinling

dolphinling's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
260
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 260

  1. Re:Quality not Quantity on Is The Firefox Honeymoon Over? · · Score: 3, Informative

    And look at the most recent Firefox fix - it's a temp fix which only disables the insecure feature.

    There are a couple reasons for this. First, that patch was easy to make and test, and could be pushed out in, if my research is right, exactly 6 hours from the time it was on Full Disclosure to the time the patch was publicly available. The actual patch needed more than six hours to be made, tested, etc.

    Also, several other security fixes are being put in to 1.0.7, which will be the patch for this.

  2. Re:Let's be honest here on Making Ice Without Electricity · · Score: 1

    No, because they lack the fossil fuels.

  3. Re:Dang. on Google's Summer of Code Over · · Score: 1

    you need a class for A+? and you're posting on slashdot? pfft.

    I know, what's he talking about? I give myself A+s all the time, and put gold stars next to them!

  4. Re:Patent infringement on Unpatched Firefox Flaw May Expose Users · · Score: 1

    Well getting automatic updates for windows would require that Microsoft actually ever patched their security bugs. ;-)

  5. Re:1.5 safe? on Unpatched Firefox Flaw May Expose Users · · Score: 1

    You didn't download 1.5, you dowloaded the 1.5 beta 1 release candidate . That's triply qualified as not 1.5.

    It's not fixed yet, but when it is, you'll get it automatically when firefox updates itself (the new update system is awesome).

  6. Re:Patent infringement on Unpatched Firefox Flaw May Expose Users · · Score: 1

    They do. Everyone else's flaws are automagically patched the instant they're found. Since 12 hours have gone by, you can be sure that not only has this been patched already, but your version of firefox updated itself and you're now safe.

    </sarcasm>Actually, if you're using a nightly, that probably will happen in a few hours. The new patching system is awesome. Binary diffs, so no downloading huge files, it downloads in the background so it doesn't disturb you, and installs when you restart firefox. It's amazingly convienient.

  7. Re:Top Ten on Das Keyboard: Hit Any Key · · Score: 1

    1. It's much cooler and geekier to make your own like my buddy did.

    I should try this with a real Model M. I seem to remember one in the house from years ago, it's probably up in the attic...

  8. Re:Best Security: 1st Amendment on What is Responsible Disclosure for Security Flaws? · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's perfectly legitimate, as any high school student who's gone through the torture called "sig figs" can tell you.

    The fixed number of digits after the decimal point implies that it's rounded, and is accurate to that level of precision. 100.000 is more precise than 100.00.

  9. Re:Online banking on Firefox Moving On From SSL 2.0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Go to about:config, right click and make a new boolean, name it wallet.crypto.autocompleteoverride, and set its value to 1 (or true).

    The banks don't let it be the default, or even have it be a normal preference, but it's okay to have it be hidden like that.

  10. Re:That's nice and all on Firefox Moving On From SSL 2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a troll, but I'll bite and see if I can get a free worm.

    This is just wrong. A bit of research (http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/, http://planet.mozilla.org/ shows that the developers, including Asa, routinely listen to users and often ask for comments. And from the point of view of an insider (bugs I've reported: 55), developers respond quickly and helpfully to anyone who isn't wasting their time, and even those who are but do it in a curteous way.

    A few other specific points: the Mozilla Corporation is not for-profit. Nothing about a corporation says it has to be. It merely falls under business laws, making it easier for other businesses to interact with Mozilla.

    And with respect to bug 18574, it's the one about MNG support. To quote a few things from the bug:

    However, MNG inclusion won't even be considered until there is true reason to include it. According to some numbers I believe I saw at libmng or png.org/pub/mng, the number of MNG/JNG images ranges in the hundreds or the low thousands. Period. Worldwide. Ever. Almost all of these images are also set up as testcases, not as practical media on sites.

    Its not something that'll likely change going forward, unless MNG support is really low cost (i.e. not 200-300k). At 50-80k the case becomes stronger, of course. The "if you support it, they will come" argument is weak, since we did support this for three years and the content didn't come.

  11. Re:Confused? on Linux For Supervillains · · Score: 1

    Careful, they modded me "troll" for saying the exact same thing. (Even used the same word "ironic".)

  12. Re:Confused? on Linux For Supervillains · · Score: 1

    To clarify, though it's already been done, the animation you saw is a Flash animation. Flash does and always has run fine on Linux, though the releases are somewhat behind the windows and mac releases. Shockwave is an entirely different thing (by the same company), and there is no linux player. Last I checked (which was over a year ago) it worked with CrossOver, but that put up ads in the middle of what you were doing.

    Since you asked, I use Gentoo, and it was about a day old (gotta love emerge --sync && emerge -Dtau world). Every once in a while, I report a bug to Macromedia about there not being a player. You should too.

  13. Re:Confused? on Linux For Supervillains · · Score: -1, Redundant

    And rather ironic, isn't it, seeing as Shockwave doesn't even run on Linux.

  14. Re:Libre, *not* gratis. on Reconciling Information Privacy and Liberty? · · Score: 1

    An intelligent alien is not a member of the human species. An embryo is. Does that make it worse to kill that alien than the embryo? For that matter, a cat, dog, or mouse is not a memeber of the human species, but the embryo is. Yet the mouse, to all our observations, has a more developed emotional system than the embryo. Which is it worse to kill?

  15. Re:Wow! What a question to ask on Slashdot... on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 1

    Oops, yeah.

  16. Re:Am I missing something? on Perl's Chip Salzenberg Sued, Home Raided · · Score: 1

    Eeeh.. Slashdotted. What's it say?

  17. Re:Am I missing something? on Perl's Chip Salzenberg Sued, Home Raided · · Score: 1

    For the more than two years that I worked at HMS,...

    That's in the past tense, so I'd expect he was already gone from the company when this happened.

  18. Re:Revenge of the Spelling Nazi and Grammar Troll on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 1

    Vowel sound, not vowel. It makes it easier to pronounce. That's why you see "an honorary degree", but not "an hospital" (unless the person has a really weird accent and pronounces it "an 'ospital").

  19. Re:Wow! What a question to ask on Slashdot... on Hackers, Spelling, and Grammar? · · Score: 1

    In "You have got mail", "have got" is the verb; the sentence is in the past perfect. (One could argue about whether or not "got" is correct, though.) In "You have mail" "have" is the verb; the sentence is in the present.

    They're both correct, but have subtly different meanings.

  20. Re:Thanks Opera! on Opera: Firefox User Figures 'Inflated' · · Score: 1

    At least you could have picked up a F/OSS browser to masquerade [as] Opera...

    Actually, that's a really good idea... Seeing as Opera's rendering is correct most of the time, it's actually closer to Firefox's (which is also correct most of the time) than IE's (which isn't). And since more and more pages are learning about Firefox, chances are the user experience would be as good as or better if Opera masqueraded as Firefox.

    I'm gonna go file a bug on that...

  21. Re:Any recommendations for a hosting service? on Best Web Authoring Application? · · Score: 1

    I've gone with DreamHost* and I absolutely love it. 120GB/month for only $8**, with PHP, MYSQL, easy installs of wordpress and various other things I don't use, email, Jabber, etc.

    Unless you absolutely need to pay under $8 a month, I've looked around quite a bit and it seems to be the cheapest and also one of the best out there.

    *(disclaimer: link gets me money if you sign up with it :-)

    ** Can you say "overkill"? I use about 100MB of that, so I split with a friend and we each pay $4 a month.

  22. Re:What's worse on Mozilla Uncooperative With OSS Groups on Security? · · Score: 1

    It's tri-licensed under the MPL, GPL, and LGPL. That means you can release code based on Mozilla under any one, two, or all three.

    (Of course, it won't be accepted into the mozilla.org codebase unless it's also tri-licensed)

  23. Re:Phantom Console on Phantom Console May Never Materialize · · Score: 0

    +1, First non "well duh" comment

  24. Exponential Growth... on Firefox Growth Slowing? · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or it could mean that firefox's growth just isn't exponential, 'cause that would be pretty hard to keep up for very long...

  25. Re:80 Million Downloads... on Firefox Growth Slowing? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simple version: if you used the Firefox upgrade mechanism, they don't.

    IIRC, it's slightly more complicated than that. Even so, the number is incredibly hard to guess: lots of people download more than once, and lots of people (think office rollouts or the like) download only once fore many machines. It's a guesstimate, and even if it were a good guesstimate it still is pretty meaningless, since it doesn't take into account how much people actually use the browser.

    One of the people on http://planet.mozilla.org/ had a good post on this recently (that I can't find right now), what I've said here is pretty much a ripoff of my memory of what they said.