The battery is tiny. It can power a 60W light bulb for 2.5 hours and that's it. This blurb is straight from the beagle2 site FAQ:
How much power does Beagle 2 have?
Beagle 2's battery supplies enough power to run a 60W lightbulb for about 2.5 hours. Before it runs down, the battery will be replenished using solar energy collected by the 4 solar panels.
I wonder why they couldn't make it more powerful.
There is still hope. Mars Express will be in low Mars orbit on 4 Jan, and at the same time Beagle2 will go into emergency transponder mode, a contingency I was not aware of. With Beagle2 squawking continuously there is a much better chance for the search and rescue. Mars Express was specifically designed to communicate with the Lander unlike all other assets that have tried to communicate with it. Also, Mars Express has a camera and will be looking for the spent parachutes and airbags (needle in a haystack). After a thorough search by Mars Express if it's not found, it probably won't be for a while.
We have a spare Apollo ship sitting in moth balls, there is some chatter about sending it to the moon again. There is no reason why we couldn't pull this off. It would be great to kick off our moon base with a (retro) Apollo mission.
I agree with you, but there is NO WAY we will let the Columbia mission be the final Space Shuttle mission. I for one would vote for at least one more successful mission, then they can retire the fleet. It's a matter of national pride.
Whenever we fail we learn. This is how a person, or a nation gains experience. We have identified the cause of the problem, and will attempt to correct it. We will move forward thanks to the failures and the astronauts that sacrificed their lives. The Beagle2 may have failed, but the UK has learned. They to will correct their deficiencies and move forward. The steps that NASA are taking is welcomed progress. I am looking forward to the next successful shuttle flight, because it will be a major advancement for the program and a major advancement for our continued goal of space exploration.
Many lives were sacrificed to get the United States to the moon. Your claim is not justified and very offensive. The Apollo program was/is an engineering marvel that should be embraced by all mankind. Here are some rebuttals to your feeble claim of a moon hoax.
I'm assuming the Beagle2 made it to the surface but was unlucky in where it landed. If the Beagle had landed at an akward angle, unable to open it's solar array- wouldn't the Martian wind eventually move it around? It only weighs 160 pounds or so, and the avg winds on Mars is about 20mph but gets up to 60 often and in the 100's during storms. I'm sure a fail-safe was included in the plan in the event the Lander couldn't open-RIGHT?? Are the batteries required to open the panels.. or do they spring? If they spring open the mission can be started then! On another note... I bet NASA is considering changing the landing position of one of the US rovers to rendezvous with the Beagle2. That would be awesome! Don't give up!
I'm suprised the ESA came up with such a good name. Based on the names of the Royal Navy fleet, I would've expected names for the Mars lander to use the same theme. Something like...
"HMS I'll Slap Mars in the Ass"
EDL is the most complex part of the journey, I'm keeping my fingers crossed for all 3 landers. The Beagle2 landing sequence and technique looks very similar to the NASA Mars Rover landing a few years ago. I wonder where that technology came from...
The Seagull and Arctic Ice Fish can both produce an "anti freeze" compound in their bloodstream. I guess the squirrel can do similar. The big question is; Can humans tolerate this toxin? also, what are the by products from this toxin?
I hope we find answers because this is required for future space travel.
http://www.solcomhouse.com/Antarctica.htm
Since there is > 98% commonality between 'our' genes, I have read, and you can assume that there has been a baby borne between the two. There has been no documented proof, but you have to wonder...
The chinese has two major advantages. Firstly, a lot of the theory about how to do all those kind of stuff is already public knowledge.
That's a mouthful! Yes, indeed they will learn from our (USA) mistakes. Many men have lost their lives getting to the moon. The pioneers had the most difficult task; learning from only thier own mistakes. China will capitalize on this "public knowledge". However, I ask you this: How much of the data do you believe is public knowledge? The programs that run the shuttle? The architecture of the spacecraft? We have been in this business awhile. Everyone knows it's a very dangerous proposition. I wish them well, but fear they to, must learn from their own mistakes. Their is no cheating on this exam. It's all about experience. We have decades of experience and knowledge that is not available to the public, at least not all. When they finally do get there, I would like to be the first to order some Egg Foo Young for take off...err, I mean take out.
Slashdot Mirror
OOPS I stand corrected.. I read all about it here > here. Nice concept LOL.
In the scientific community GMT (universal time)is used as a standard, as well as the metric system. There is no such thing as metric time.
What the hell is metric time? No such animal.
The battery is tiny. It can power a 60W light bulb for 2.5 hours and that's it. This blurb is straight from the beagle2 site FAQ: How much power does Beagle 2 have? Beagle 2's battery supplies enough power to run a 60W lightbulb for about 2.5 hours. Before it runs down, the battery will be replenished using solar energy collected by the 4 solar panels. I wonder why they couldn't make it more powerful.
There is still hope. Mars Express will be in low Mars orbit on 4 Jan, and at the same time Beagle2 will go into emergency transponder mode, a contingency I was not aware of. With Beagle2 squawking continuously there is a much better chance for the search and rescue. Mars Express was specifically designed to communicate with the Lander unlike all other assets that have tried to communicate with it. Also, Mars Express has a camera and will be looking for the spent parachutes and airbags (needle in a haystack). After a thorough search by Mars Express if it's not found, it probably won't be for a while.
We have a spare Apollo ship sitting in moth balls, there is some chatter about sending it to the moon again. There is no reason why we couldn't pull this off. It would be great to kick off our moon base with a (retro) Apollo mission.
I agree with you, but there is NO WAY we will let the Columbia mission be the final Space Shuttle mission. I for one would vote for at least one more successful mission, then they can retire the fleet. It's a matter of national pride.
Whenever we fail we learn. This is how a person, or a nation gains experience. We have identified the cause of the problem, and will attempt to correct it. We will move forward thanks to the failures and the astronauts that sacrificed their lives. The Beagle2 may have failed, but the UK has learned. They to will correct their deficiencies and move forward. The steps that NASA are taking is welcomed progress. I am looking forward to the next successful shuttle flight, because it will be a major advancement for the program and a major advancement for our continued goal of space exploration.
Grow up! you sound like a bunch of babies. My country is better than your country nah-nah-na-na-nahh-na... Pull-eeze
Many lives were sacrificed to get the United States to the moon. Your claim is not justified and very offensive. The Apollo program was/is an engineering marvel that should be embraced by all mankind. Here are some rebuttals to your feeble claim of a moon hoax.
I'm assuming the Beagle2 made it to the surface but was unlucky in where it landed. If the Beagle had landed at an akward angle, unable to open it's solar array- wouldn't the Martian wind eventually move it around? It only weighs 160 pounds or so, and the avg winds on Mars is about 20mph but gets up to 60 often and in the 100's during storms. I'm sure a fail-safe was included in the plan in the event the Lander couldn't open-RIGHT?? Are the batteries required to open the panels.. or do they spring? If they spring open the mission can be started then! On another note ... I bet NASA is considering changing the landing position of one of the US rovers to rendezvous with the Beagle2. That would be awesome! Don't give up!
I think they should clone Seka.. and lots of them!
I'm suprised the ESA came up with such a good name. Based on the names of the Royal Navy fleet, I would've expected names for the Mars lander to use the same theme. Something like... "HMS I'll Slap Mars in the Ass"
EDL is the most complex part of the journey, I'm keeping my fingers crossed for all 3 landers. The Beagle2 landing sequence and technique looks very similar to the NASA Mars Rover landing a few years ago. I wonder where that technology came from...
So, when were you diagnosed?
The Seagull and Arctic Ice Fish can both produce an "anti freeze" compound in their bloodstream. I guess the squirrel can do similar. The big question is; Can humans tolerate this toxin? also, what are the by products from this toxin? I hope we find answers because this is required for future space travel. http://www.solcomhouse.com/Antarctica.htm
Since there is > 98% commonality between 'our' genes, I have read, and you can assume that there has been a baby borne between the two. There has been no documented proof, but you have to wonder...
It wont be very expensive to refurbish the SaturnV thats sitting in mothballs. We know it works, so there is a possibility we will use it.
The chinese has two major advantages. Firstly, a lot of the theory about how to do all those kind of stuff is already public knowledge. That's a mouthful! Yes, indeed they will learn from our (USA) mistakes. Many men have lost their lives getting to the moon. The pioneers had the most difficult task; learning from only thier own mistakes. China will capitalize on this "public knowledge". However, I ask you this: How much of the data do you believe is public knowledge? The programs that run the shuttle? The architecture of the spacecraft? We have been in this business awhile. Everyone knows it's a very dangerous proposition. I wish them well, but fear they to, must learn from their own mistakes. Their is no cheating on this exam. It's all about experience. We have decades of experience and knowledge that is not available to the public, at least not all. When they finally do get there, I would like to be the first to order some Egg Foo Young for take off...err, I mean take out.