Who the fu... Sh! There is noth... Sh! It is th... Sh! Not only... Sh! I don't... Sh! it ha... Sh! Your F... Sh! They... Sh! Gue... Sh! You are to bla... "Let me tell you a little story about a man named Sh! Sh! even before you start. That was a pre-emptive "sh!" Now, I have a whole bag of "sh!" with your name on it."
...and the judge will say "Did you willfully destroy this evidence?" and you might say "Yeah man, I have no obligation to help them to make their case!"
No, I would never say anything like that to the judge. I might say, "What evidence?" Or it might be best not to say anything at all. The burden is on them.
That's like saying doctors have good penmanship. I'm not exactly sure how many corrections are made to a story before it goes to print, but I believe it's more than one.
Though I will grant that majority rule is "working", there certainly was no turning point. It just more of the same. The ruling party is still...ruling, and business is good. What's this "turning point" you speak of?
I repeat, A private individual has no obligation to assist any investigation by any authority. It is too easy to declare anything as evidence to be confiscated for any reason. I might not feel so strongly if I thought the law was not being abused. Under the present circumstances, I see no need to cooperate. It appears some resistance is needed to regain our authority over government servants.
No, let Google and all the other private sites go nuts, and then insure that the FTC and FDA and USGA, you name it, become trustworthy sources of information, that aren't in the hands of the people they regulate, by electing politicians who will turn them around. I don't care how many phonies are out there. The only part of the net we have a right to regulate is that run by government with taxpayer dollars. In other words,.gov and.mil are under public control.
Enron is(was?) a publicly traded entity. It's documentation should exist under different rules. A private individual should not be obligated to answer to anyone.
Not since NAFTA passed. Now it's just a police state with nice weather. And since the whole world is becoming a police state, just base your decision on where to live on the climate.
Let burn down some more rain forest to grow more cane to feed this monster. What's wrong with using algae that requires one fifth the space as corn or sugar and probably less maintenance? If it can be made into bio-diesel, then I'm sure it will make great battery "acid" too. Obviously all biomass will provide some kind of energy, but for the best bang for the buck and highest energy density, algae is it. Check out the yields here to see why we should NOT use corn.
And it makes sense, too: when someone isn't old enough to vote, drive a car, drink a beer, smoke a cigarette or have sex with their girl-/boyfriend, why should they be old enough to be put on trial?
For the simple reason that there's money to be made. You're not looking for any moral basis, are you?
So let's put them in jail, support them for a large part of their lives, give criminals an easy way to make money, ruin millions of lives in a bogus war, loose the tax on consumption...
What is being overlooked here are the huge profits generated by prohibition on both sides of the law and on and off the books. The purpose behind all prohibitions of goods of any kind is purely economic. And with drugs in the US, race played a part. Unlike alcohol and tobacco, marijuana requires very little infrastructure to produce and consume. When it's so easy to "grow yer own", it will never be the big money maker that alcohol and tobacco and other drugs are. Prohibition is the answer to that little problem. Profitability is up in all the "right" sectors, law enforcement, government "services", the prison industry is doing great. Corruption in government is up, respect for the law is down, but we're talking about 20% of the world's economy at least. Accountants wield more power than lawyers. Heh, actually they're the two ends of this parasite. A symbiotic relationship if there ever was one. The funny thing is that after hours, it's easier to score a bag of weed than a six pack. Easier still to get coke...for all the obvious reasons. Prohibition is very logical in a certain business sense, and in a world run by pirates, that the only sense there is. This all only goes to show that, despite all our chrome covered gadgets, we are still as primitive as we ever were.
The second amendment does not apply to normal citizens. It applies to organized militias.
Just in case people actually believe that. It is necessary to say that you are incorrect. Note the commas. Very important. Also the word "the", as in THE people. Not necessarily of the militia.
It is quite simply a system of interconnected electronic devices that has, quite predictably, acquired a life of its own, a mere extension of the biological units that created it. As long as we chase that illusive pot of gold, this is going to continue. The easy money is just too tempting. The net is just another tool in this thousands of years old pursuit. The spammers are the symptom. You need to go to the source of their power. That might be the greed of their customers trying to make a quick buck, just like the spammers.
Slashdot Mirror
Who the fu...
Sh!
There is noth...
Sh!
It is th...
Sh!
Not only...
Sh!
I don't...
Sh!
it ha...
Sh!
Your F...
Sh!
They...
Sh!
Gue...
Sh!
You are to bla...
"Let me tell you a little story about a man named Sh! Sh! even before you start. That was a pre-emptive "sh!" Now, I have a whole bag of "sh!" with your name on it."
...and the judge will say "Did you willfully destroy this evidence?" and you might say "Yeah man, I have no obligation to help them to make their case!"
No, I would never say anything like that to the judge. I might say, "What evidence?" Or it might be best not to say anything at all. The burden is on them.
Chris Matthews
Who?
He knows at least how to spell.
That's like saying doctors have good penmanship. I'm not exactly sure how many corrections are made to a story before it goes to print, but I believe it's more than one.
Though I will grant that majority rule is "working", there certainly was no turning point. It just more of the same. The ruling party is still...ruling, and business is good. What's this "turning point" you speak of?
I repeat, A private individual has no obligation to assist any investigation by any authority. It is too easy to declare anything as evidence to be confiscated for any reason. I might not feel so strongly if I thought the law was not being abused. Under the present circumstances, I see no need to cooperate. It appears some resistance is needed to regain our authority over government servants.
No, let Google and all the other private sites go nuts, and then insure that the FTC and FDA and USGA, you name it, become trustworthy sources of information, that aren't in the hands of the people they regulate, by electing politicians who will turn them around. I don't care how many phonies are out there. The only part of the net we have a right to regulate is that run by government with taxpayer dollars. In other words, .gov and .mil are under public control.
Enron is(was?) a publicly traded entity. It's documentation should exist under different rules. A private individual should not be obligated to answer to anyone.
Then it became a shopping mall. But now, it's a war zone.
Why just settle for one when you can have both?
Not since NAFTA passed. Now it's just a police state with nice weather. And since the whole world is becoming a police state, just base your decision on where to live on the climate.
Well I see a compound subject, at least if they weren't into conjunctions in those days. At this point I'm satisfied with the comma.
Let burn down some more rain forest to grow more cane to feed this monster. What's wrong with using algae that requires one fifth the space as corn or sugar and probably less maintenance? If it can be made into bio-diesel, then I'm sure it will make great battery "acid" too. Obviously all biomass will provide some kind of energy, but for the best bang for the buck and highest energy density, algae is it. Check out the yields here to see why we should NOT use corn.
Don't know where you get your figures from...it would actually be $999,301
...a dedicated key marked "Ctrl Alt Del
It also has a dedicated "any" key.
to 1972 , Sherman.
And it makes sense, too: when someone isn't old enough to vote, drive a car, drink a beer, smoke a cigarette or have sex with their girl-/boyfriend, why should they be old enough to be put on trial?
For the simple reason that there's money to be made. You're not looking for any moral basis, are you?
It would put an end to the other type of suit that Google continually faces.
And it would put a bunch of lawyers out of work. What are you? Some kind of commie?
Every time a lawsuit is dismissed, a lawyer's secretary breaks a nail.
1) Yes, but how are they going to know if they're on the right one?
2) Let's see 'em build one. Well, since we're essentially a collection of microbes, I guess they already have.
HEY! Don't go knockin' solitaire! I thought I had seen my last Windows upgrade until I saw the new version. This Bill Gates guy is pure genius.
Can too! And a lot faster than some stupid bird.
So let's put them in jail, support them for a large part of their lives, give criminals an easy way to make money, ruin millions of lives in a bogus war, loose the tax on consumption...
What is being overlooked here are the huge profits generated by prohibition on both sides of the law and on and off the books. The purpose behind all prohibitions of goods of any kind is purely economic. And with drugs in the US, race played a part. Unlike alcohol and tobacco, marijuana requires very little infrastructure to produce and consume. When it's so easy to "grow yer own", it will never be the big money maker that alcohol and tobacco and other drugs are. Prohibition is the answer to that little problem. Profitability is up in all the "right" sectors, law enforcement, government "services", the prison industry is doing great. Corruption in government is up, respect for the law is down, but we're talking about 20% of the world's economy at least. Accountants wield more power than lawyers. Heh, actually they're the two ends of this parasite. A symbiotic relationship if there ever was one. The funny thing is that after hours, it's easier to score a bag of weed than a six pack. Easier still to get coke...for all the obvious reasons. Prohibition is very logical in a certain business sense, and in a world run by pirates, that the only sense there is. This all only goes to show that, despite all our chrome covered gadgets, we are still as primitive as we ever were.
The second amendment does not apply to normal citizens. It applies to organized militias.
Just in case people actually believe that. It is necessary to say that you are incorrect. Note the commas. Very important. Also the word "the", as in THE people. Not necessarily of the militia.
...what the net really is.
It is quite simply a system of interconnected electronic devices that has, quite predictably, acquired a life of its own, a mere extension of the biological units that created it. As long as we chase that illusive pot of gold, this is going to continue. The easy money is just too tempting. The net is just another tool in this thousands of years old pursuit. The spammers are the symptom. You need to go to the source of their power. That might be the greed of their customers trying to make a quick buck, just like the spammers.
Oops, I did it again.
So very sorry...