The correct analogy would be if Comcast were Exxon, they would be the gas station who has run out of gas because Exxon hired a trucking company that couldn't supply enough trucks to keep all the gas stations full.
Netflix does now pay Comcast $99.99/month for internet access like consumers do. They have to pay for their uplinks like all major websites do. So Netflix goes to the dirt cheapest ISP which is Cognet. Why is Cognet the cheapest? Because they skimp on their connections. So while Cognet sells Netflix all the uplinks they need, Cognet does not have adequate link agreements with Comcast/Verizon/etc. A dumbed down example would be Cognet is trying to push 1GB per second through 500MB per second connections. Packets get dropped.
The whole internet is playing right into the hands of Netflix who is trying to act like a victim. They wanted to try and pay the least, so they setup this whole scheme about throttling when the one who is actually the bad guy here is Cognet for selling service they can''t provide. They are basically acting like a webhost who sticks 10,000 website on one server.
I went to one of the game sites and Indiana Jones Adventure World says it has 570,000 have played it. How can you have hundreds of thousands of people that have played your game? Unless this counts the people who signed up and spent less than 10 minutes on it. I would really like to know how much some of these games bombed.
How can many have court orders but most do not? Shouldn't it be some and most?
I went to read the article to find the answer and was not shocked to find out the summery is misleading. Of the 700 requests per day, 230 were without court order or about 33%. A lot less than "most".
Someone should start copying all Zynga mobile titles. They already have done the research and figured out what are the best games to copy. You copy their games, make what you think are the best improvements, and reap all the profits. Call it Dream Tower.
Calculators are appropriate at a certain level of math when you have the basics down. Being able to use calculators in anything lower than Calculus is just not right in my opinion. I've seen them used at the elementary level, the excuse the teacher used was they "finished learning" addition and subtraction, so they can now use a shortcut. Is it any wonder why math scores are so low in some regions?
And what is wrong with memorization? You have to memorize dates in history, punctuation in writing, and elements in science. Suddenly it is wrong for students to be forced to memorize the formula to find the area of a circle.
However, a company's name mistakingly placed on a list of entities for or against any bill shouldn't equate to slander.
It isn't about someone mistakenly putting a name on the list, it is about someone purposefully putting a name on the list. Slander is when you say something you know is not true. Someone could spend all day putting Slashdot on that list and X amount of people are going to see it. Some will eventually learn the truth, but there will always be those who forever think Slashdot supported SOPA.
Re:How did you manged to not compare it to BF3?
on
Modern Warfare 3 Released
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
2 very different games, I don't understand why people compare them in the first place.
Yeah, it would be like comparing Apples and Microsofts.
"Seriously officer, this guy had a knife and he forced me to steal this big screen TV that is in my living room. I was going to return it after the riots were over!"
People riot after their favorite team wins a championship. It is not always touched off by something violent.
To create a mob you need a lot of people. Social media is definitely making it much easier to do things as a mob. At first it was used for good(?) with those flash mobs of people performing musical numbers. Now it is being used to rob stores. Without Twitter and Facebook, it would be next to impossible to coordinate what is going on currently in Britain. So, unfortunately, technology is to blame.
This could absolutely compromise the investigations. If the emails are leaked the defense could possibly get them suppressed and made unusable in court.
Speech recognition for purposes of translating words into text still has some way to go. There are hundreds of thousands of common words used in different ways and programming for all those possibilities is impractical. But if you have a specific word or phrase you want to pick out, it is hugely reliable and has been for decades. Haven't you ever called customer support before? So if the China wants to filter the word protest, it is trivial with the right equipment.
Of course there are other complaints about the iPhone. The point is the #1 reason people either don't like the iPhone or have not purchased it is because it is only available through AT&T. When the iPhone is offered through other carriers, AT&T will likely lose many customers. But overall Apple would gain the people waiting for it to go multi-carrier, plus the people who hate Android, and the people who don't get good AT&T coverage in their area. Google is already maxed out their customer base, Apple has tons of room for growth in the US.
When you have 100+ handsets sold by every carrier under the sun, of course you will sell more. Microsoft just dropped the ball and Google swooped in to take advantage of Apple's contract with AT&T. If it ended a couple years ago who knows if Android would even exist today. When it expires and Apple is allowed to sell the iPhone with whoever they want, Google is going to be hurting. The only complaint about the iPhone is you can only use it on AT&T. Compare that to all the criticisms of Android phones (bad user interface, slow upgrades, no upgrades, poor support, etc.)
Do you want the government who has it anyway or do you want Facebook who will sell it. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages. I personally would prefer the government to be in charge of my identification because they already handle it will passports, social security and driver's license. It only hurts me to give all this information to a company like Facebook.
Credit card companies are certainly not happy with the amount of internet fraud they have to deal with. If the US had a standardized system for online identification, you can bet it would be required by all websites who want to continue to accept credit card transactions. It would be nice to ship packages once again to somewhere other than my billing address.
How awful is it that detectives were able to discover that her husband searched for information on the exact thing that killed her shortly before her death, along with other methods of killing someone. On top of that he attempted to delete traces of it. This is an invasion of piracy.
Every 2-3 years Apple has been releasing a product into a brand new space now. People are currently focused on the iPad. But the question every investor wants answered is what comes next and how successful could it be? Apple is already over the iPad while other companies are still trying to copy it.
Resurrecting an animated show is a whole lot easier and cheaper than rebuilding sets, getting back actors, etc. Everything about an animated show can be replaced, even voice actors.
It must be by some miracle that Slashdot and every other website out there, makes money on advertisements. Or maybe not everyone uses advertisement blockers. I would guess Wikipedia could still make double or triple their operation cost, despite all the people blocking advertisements.
Slashdot Mirror
The correct analogy would be if Comcast were Exxon, they would be the gas station who has run out of gas because Exxon hired a trucking company that couldn't supply enough trucks to keep all the gas stations full.
Netflix does now pay Comcast $99.99/month for internet access like consumers do. They have to pay for their uplinks like all major websites do. So Netflix goes to the dirt cheapest ISP which is Cognet. Why is Cognet the cheapest? Because they skimp on their connections. So while Cognet sells Netflix all the uplinks they need, Cognet does not have adequate link agreements with Comcast/Verizon/etc. A dumbed down example would be Cognet is trying to push 1GB per second through 500MB per second connections. Packets get dropped.
The whole internet is playing right into the hands of Netflix who is trying to act like a victim. They wanted to try and pay the least, so they setup this whole scheme about throttling when the one who is actually the bad guy here is Cognet for selling service they can''t provide. They are basically acting like a webhost who sticks 10,000 website on one server.
I went to one of the game sites and Indiana Jones Adventure World says it has 570,000 have played it. How can you have hundreds of thousands of people that have played your game? Unless this counts the people who signed up and spent less than 10 minutes on it. I would really like to know how much some of these games bombed.
How can many have court orders but most do not? Shouldn't it be some and most? I went to read the article to find the answer and was not shocked to find out the summery is misleading. Of the 700 requests per day, 230 were without court order or about 33%. A lot less than "most".
Someone should start copying all Zynga mobile titles. They already have done the research and figured out what are the best games to copy. You copy their games, make what you think are the best improvements, and reap all the profits. Call it Dream Tower.
Calculators are appropriate at a certain level of math when you have the basics down. Being able to use calculators in anything lower than Calculus is just not right in my opinion. I've seen them used at the elementary level, the excuse the teacher used was they "finished learning" addition and subtraction, so they can now use a shortcut. Is it any wonder why math scores are so low in some regions?
And what is wrong with memorization? You have to memorize dates in history, punctuation in writing, and elements in science. Suddenly it is wrong for students to be forced to memorize the formula to find the area of a circle.
It isn't about someone mistakenly putting a name on the list, it is about someone purposefully putting a name on the list. Slander is when you say something you know is not true. Someone could spend all day putting Slashdot on that list and X amount of people are going to see it. Some will eventually learn the truth, but there will always be those who forever think Slashdot supported SOPA.
Yeah, it would be like comparing Apples and Microsofts.
Or maybe they exist because big corporations refuse to sell their goods for a 100% discount.
This is the type of summary we can expect now that Cmdr Taco is gone.
"Seriously officer, this guy had a knife and he forced me to steal this big screen TV that is in my living room. I was going to return it after the riots were over!"
People riot after their favorite team wins a championship. It is not always touched off by something violent.
To create a mob you need a lot of people. Social media is definitely making it much easier to do things as a mob. At first it was used for good(?) with those flash mobs of people performing musical numbers. Now it is being used to rob stores. Without Twitter and Facebook, it would be next to impossible to coordinate what is going on currently in Britain. So, unfortunately, technology is to blame.
This could absolutely compromise the investigations. If the emails are leaked the defense could possibly get them suppressed and made unusable in court.
Speech recognition for purposes of translating words into text still has some way to go. There are hundreds of thousands of common words used in different ways and programming for all those possibilities is impractical. But if you have a specific word or phrase you want to pick out, it is hugely reliable and has been for decades. Haven't you ever called customer support before? So if the China wants to filter the word protest, it is trivial with the right equipment.
Should have been article title.
Their entire advertising campaign could be: we are not AT&T. They would still get more iPhone users in 1 year than AT&T managed in ~3 years.
Of course there are other complaints about the iPhone. The point is the #1 reason people either don't like the iPhone or have not purchased it is because it is only available through AT&T. When the iPhone is offered through other carriers, AT&T will likely lose many customers. But overall Apple would gain the people waiting for it to go multi-carrier, plus the people who hate Android, and the people who don't get good AT&T coverage in their area. Google is already maxed out their customer base, Apple has tons of room for growth in the US.
When you have 100+ handsets sold by every carrier under the sun, of course you will sell more. Microsoft just dropped the ball and Google swooped in to take advantage of Apple's contract with AT&T. If it ended a couple years ago who knows if Android would even exist today. When it expires and Apple is allowed to sell the iPhone with whoever they want, Google is going to be hurting. The only complaint about the iPhone is you can only use it on AT&T. Compare that to all the criticisms of Android phones (bad user interface, slow upgrades, no upgrades, poor support, etc.)
Do you want the government who has it anyway or do you want Facebook who will sell it. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages. I personally would prefer the government to be in charge of my identification because they already handle it will passports, social security and driver's license. It only hurts me to give all this information to a company like Facebook.
Credit card companies are certainly not happy with the amount of internet fraud they have to deal with. If the US had a standardized system for online identification, you can bet it would be required by all websites who want to continue to accept credit card transactions. It would be nice to ship packages once again to somewhere other than my billing address.
If you brought in billions in revenue to the state, you too could have special laws enacted for your benefit.
How awful is it that detectives were able to discover that her husband searched for information on the exact thing that killed her shortly before her death, along with other methods of killing someone. On top of that he attempted to delete traces of it. This is an invasion of piracy.
Every 2-3 years Apple has been releasing a product into a brand new space now. People are currently focused on the iPad. But the question every investor wants answered is what comes next and how successful could it be? Apple is already over the iPad while other companies are still trying to copy it.
Resurrecting an animated show is a whole lot easier and cheaper than rebuilding sets, getting back actors, etc. Everything about an animated show can be replaced, even voice actors.
It must be by some miracle that Slashdot and every other website out there, makes money on advertisements. Or maybe not everyone uses advertisement blockers. I would guess Wikipedia could still make double or triple their operation cost, despite all the people blocking advertisements.