You've been told to stop involving me and others in your criminal activities. You are in direct violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Slashdot is not a platform your illegal spam and illegal comments. Your activities have only caused Slashdot to tighten filters to the point that insightful commentary is now difficult to try to deal with you.
You have previously violated on Slashdot privacy rights, promoted offers without the express written consent of Slashdot Media, your content is destructive due to what has happened with Slashdot filters and embedding advertising without the express written consent of Slashdot media. All of these are against the Slashdot's "Terms of Use" and in turn you have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Your criminal activities are unacceptable and your continued persistence after being advised of such means you willfully and intentionally violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Slashdot's "Terms of Use" to further propogate your spam without a care that you are responsibile for further ruining discourse on Slashdot.
You've been asked to stop, you've been told to stop, you've even been banned and you continue. Your persistance in unethical and criminal behaviour is disgusting.
You've been told to stop involving me and others in your criminal activities. You are in direct violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Slashdot is not a platform your illegal spam and illegal comments. Your activities have only caused Slashdot to tighten filters to the point that insightful commentary is now difficult to try to deal with you.
You have spammed this article so many times, it's ridiculous!
You have previously violated on Slashdot privacy rights, promoted offers without the express written consent of Slashdot Media, your content is destructive due to what has happened with Slashdot filters and embedding advertising without the express written consent of Slashdot media. All of these are against the Slashdot's "Terms of Use" and in turn you have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Your criminal activities are unacceptable and your continued persistence after being advised of such means you willfully and intentionally violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Slashdot's "Terms of Use" to further propogate your spam without a care that you are responsibile for further ruining discourse on Slashdot.
You've been asked to stop, you've been told to stop, you've even been banned and you continue. Your persistance in unethical and criminal behaviour is disgusting.
Do not trust APK's software, APK is a criminal, he is blatantly violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by posting here as he is banned from Slashdot.
APK's ban evasion has lead to more restrictive filters being placed on Slashdot that hinder good discussions.
I pointed out your browser addons CANNOT MANIPULATE HOSTS BY THEMSELVES (or build hosts) due to OS security on hosts.
Sure they can, they can request a security context from the operating system (it's addressable via WS_SECURITY_CONTEXT_MESSAGE_SECURITY_BINDING), they can use a helper, they can even in your favourite scenario, relaunch the browser requesting administrative rights - which is not unlike what your application requires to run properly.
After you moved the goal posts by crying about asking for alternatives to making it administrator, of which I provided numerous. Including changing the security context, which you keep ignoring because you think it's file permissions, like a dumbass.
I really don't care about what other goal posts you try to create. You said addons couldn't do it and I told you what alternate methods you could use. You have lost this one, Agent Smith.
I could write code already reasonably well in m68k assembler, x86 assembler, c, c++, c#, java etc. and it brought me nothing to build upon my prior knowledge. No new concepts, nothing.
So displaying a context sensitive UI to the user based on the current actions of the user is not predictive?
Oh I see what you mean here. Not really if the only purpose is to display a hidden tab that contains all the tools for that particular option that otherwise completely doesn't work. When I was talking about predictive, I was speaking of what was in Office 97 and higher until Office 2007 where they were grading most used items in a menu and rearranging the toolbar on the fly automatically based on that while enforcing persistance of order others.
Having a different set of tools visible and available depending on the current tasks the user is doing e.g. clicking on an image vs clicking on a table?
Indeed, it's a legacy from the previous toolbar GUI too and you can disable it in Word Options if you don't like it though and even unhide it so these tabs are visible always, even when they're unusable. so I'm not understanding what the issue is with that? They have given the user the ultimate choice.
Wow, you don't know what a troll is either.
It seemed pretty troll like to me? Posting as little as possible in order to get someone to type out a lot of text. I still question it since you never bothered even answering all the previous points raised, even though I answered all of yours nor did you again even reply to the piece I specifically mentioned you didn't answer.
My response was regarding the justification because that's what you said, nothing else. My comment in my opinion is still correct.
The same UI pushed to all users, ever changing because of what the software THINKS the user is trying to do.
But, that's not what the Ribbon does?
The Ribbon always has a consistent arrangement of where items are and tabs, regardless of screen size by auto resizing elements etc. to fit, regardless of screen resolution or DPI, you can customize things only on user added tabs (or the QAT), but that's it. There is no predictive work done at all on the Ribbon (hence no 'thinking' what the user is trying to do).
UX "specialists" literally said the same thing about the ribbon.
Can you be more specific about who exactly said it? Because Jensen Harris (the original lead behind developing the Ribbon UX) certainly didn't.
A UI that respects the user's needs is one that groups everything in common tasks and then lets the users show or hide the set tasks.
But you can do that too with custom tabs and even hide the default tabs...
I for one am grabbing the popcorn.
From your responses, I get the impression you don't even know what the Ribbon is or what features it has. Are you trolling?
The MUFFIN (My User Friendly -- Flexible Interface) represents a new approach to UI design, based on the respect of user needs rather than on the imposition of a single UI to all users
Oh that's right, that was the same justification that brought us the ribbon design.
No, it isn't. The Ribbon UI's justification was litterally where a single UI is applied to all users and all needs are equal. That's the complete opposite justification...
Slashdot Mirror
You've been told to stop involving me and others in your criminal activities. You are in direct violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Slashdot is not a platform your illegal spam and illegal comments. Your activities have only caused Slashdot to tighten filters to the point that insightful commentary is now difficult to try to deal with you.
You have previously violated on Slashdot privacy rights, promoted offers without the express written consent of Slashdot Media, your content is destructive due to what has happened with Slashdot filters and embedding advertising without the express written consent of Slashdot media. All of these are against the Slashdot's "Terms of Use" and in turn you have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Your criminal activities are unacceptable and your continued persistence after being advised of such means you willfully and intentionally violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Slashdot's "Terms of Use" to further propogate your spam without a care that you are responsibile for further ruining discourse on Slashdot.
You've been asked to stop, you've been told to stop, you've even been banned and you continue. Your persistance in unethical and criminal behaviour is disgusting.
Cease and desist your criminal activities immediately.
No, but that's likely because I tend to avoid Slashdot summaries that meet that criteria typically.
I asked Google if Medium was important and/or notable and it didn't answer sufficiently, actually.
I've never even heard of them before? Are they important?
You've been told to stop involving me and others in your criminal activities. You are in direct violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Slashdot is not a platform your illegal spam and illegal comments. Your activities have only caused Slashdot to tighten filters to the point that insightful commentary is now difficult to try to deal with you.
You have spammed this article so many times, it's ridiculous!
You have previously violated on Slashdot privacy rights, promoted offers without the express written consent of Slashdot Media, your content is destructive due to what has happened with Slashdot filters and embedding advertising without the express written consent of Slashdot media. All of these are against the Slashdot's "Terms of Use" and in turn you have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Your criminal activities are unacceptable and your continued persistence after being advised of such means you willfully and intentionally violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Slashdot's "Terms of Use" to further propogate your spam without a care that you are responsibile for further ruining discourse on Slashdot.
You've been asked to stop, you've been told to stop, you've even been banned and you continue. Your persistance in unethical and criminal behaviour is disgusting.
Respectfully, stop involving me and others in your criminal activities. You're ruining Slashdot with your illegal spam posts and illegal comments.
Stop involving us in your crimes APK. You are violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Stop with your criminal spam. You are violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Do not trust APK's software, APK is a criminal , he is blatantly violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by posting here as he is banned from Slashdot.
APK's ban evasion has lead to more restrictive filters being placed on Slashdot that hinder good discussions.
Sure they can, they can request a security context from the operating system (it's addressable via WS_SECURITY_CONTEXT_MESSAGE_SECURITY_BINDING), they can use a helper, they can even in your favourite scenario, relaunch the browser requesting administrative rights - which is not unlike what your application requires to run properly.
You have lost Agent Smith.
After you moved the goal posts by crying about asking for alternatives to making it administrator, of which I provided numerous. Including changing the security context, which you keep ignoring because you think it's file permissions, like a dumbass.
You have lost, Agent Smith.
I really don't care about what other goal posts you try to create. You said addons couldn't do it and I told you what alternate methods you could use. You have lost this one, Agent Smith.
Sure you can, using a helper.
Silly Agent Smith (Kowalski).
Then use a helper.
I can tell you from experience, no, no it can't.
I could write code already reasonably well in m68k assembler, x86 assembler, c, c++, c#, java etc. and it brought me nothing to build upon my prior knowledge. No new concepts, nothing.
1450.
I know it's cheaper for my partner because he feels he can upgrade less often.
I thought you needed macOS for the latest iOS development kit versions and OS X is being phased out?
You'd think people on Slashdot would know the Windows Update and BITS GPOs...
You'd think people on Slashdot would know how to use applocker...
Oh I see what you mean here. Not really if the only purpose is to display a hidden tab that contains all the tools for that particular option that otherwise completely doesn't work. When I was talking about predictive, I was speaking of what was in Office 97 and higher until Office 2007 where they were grading most used items in a menu and rearranging the toolbar on the fly automatically based on that while enforcing persistance of order others.
Indeed, it's a legacy from the previous toolbar GUI too and you can disable it in Word Options if you don't like it though and even unhide it so these tabs are visible always, even when they're unusable. so I'm not understanding what the issue is with that? They have given the user the ultimate choice.
It seemed pretty troll like to me? Posting as little as possible in order to get someone to type out a lot of text. I still question it since you never bothered even answering all the previous points raised, even though I answered all of yours nor did you again even reply to the piece I specifically mentioned you didn't answer.
My response was regarding the justification because that's what you said, nothing else. My comment in my opinion is still correct.
But, that's not what the Ribbon does?
The Ribbon always has a consistent arrangement of where items are and tabs, regardless of screen size by auto resizing elements etc. to fit, regardless of screen resolution or DPI, you can customize things only on user added tabs (or the QAT), but that's it. There is no predictive work done at all on the Ribbon (hence no 'thinking' what the user is trying to do).
Can you be more specific about who exactly said it? Because Jensen Harris (the original lead behind developing the Ribbon UX) certainly didn't.
But you can do that too with custom tabs and even hide the default tabs...
From your responses, I get the impression you don't even know what the Ribbon is or what features it has. Are you trolling?
No, it isn't. The Ribbon UI's justification was litterally where a single UI is applied to all users and all needs are equal. That's the complete opposite justification...
Have you tried the universal business adapter?