You just disable JavaScript using something like NoScript
And then watch sites start requiring JavaScript to view any articles. Googlebot runs scripts nowadays, and I'm told other general-purpose web search engines like Bing and Yandex are collateral damage.
Apple actually tried to sell a set of amplified speakers back in the heyday of the iPod, and it was a dismal failure. Not because they sucked (they didn't); but because it just wasn't the right product for Apple.
Apple has since bought Beats. What does that change?
Even if the (noninteractive) video is delayed by exactly the number of frames to compensate for a particular Bluetooth audio device's lag? That'd affect pause and seek controls, but not the majority of playback.
If I go into a grocery store, music is playing over the PA system when associates aren't making announcements. Part of my grocery bill goes toward the royalty for this music. So how can I practically avoid listening and avoid paying?
That's what we actually need. A browser that actually lies to the ad networks and content providers about what's displayed.
That kills the cap avoidance use case of ad blocking, unless the "lying" is done on some proxy server in a datacenter like with Opera Mini. Then Facebook can just block said proxies' IPs.
I was suggesting that the person running the app on their LAN register a domain name and get an SSL cert for it.
So if an app gets a million users, each of these users would have to think of a domain name that doesn't already exist and then pay $15 to register it plus the cost of hosting public dynamic DNS for that domain so that Let's Encrypt can verify it. A lot of the DNS hosting plans that popular registrars bundle <cough>GoDaddy</cough> do not support dynamic DNS; instead, the domain owner is expected to log in with a name and password and use a web form to edit records in the zone file.
That means the domain would have to be publicly accessible for the Let's Encrypt registration process, but wouldn't need to stick around indefinitely
The domain and the public dynamic DNS would need to stick around as long as the user continues to use the app, as Let's Encrypt certificates expire after 90 days.
FOUO is a DoD dissemination control applied to unclassified information when disclosure to the public of that particular record, or portion thereof, would reasonably be expected to cause a foreseeable harm to an interest protected by one or more of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Exemptions (DoDM 5200.01-V4, February 24, 2012, DoD Information Security Program: Controlled Unclassified Information).
For Official Use Only is part of Controlled Unclassified Information, which is above public but below Confidential. CUI would probably be censored out of any FOIA response in the same way as someone else's health records.
Believe it or not, LTE doesn't meet the 4G requirements.
Am I the only person who read "4G LTE" as "4G Lite" and saw it as a subtle admission that LTE doesn't meet the IMT Advanced requirements? (LTE Advanced and WiMAX Release 2 are expected to meet them.)
WiMax deployment would be a step up.
Then why did Sprint switch away from Mobile WiMAX?
Holy krap 30+ gb a month, what the hell is she doing to use that much?
I use 60 GB/mo on my cable at home, much of it from updating my devices' operating systems and applications and watching short videos in SD. If cellular and satellite ISPs want subscribers to drop their cable for wireless, they're going to have to increase the data cap dramatically.
RECORDING PROTECTED HD CONTENT WITH A SPLITTER IS PROHIBITED BY LAW.
Because video games are audiovisual works, their output is protected by copyright. Nintendo used copyright against MLG in 2010, and other publishers have the right to use it again in the future. Even with publishers that are willing to license their games for streaming, such as Nintendo nowadays, a royalty for the game itself is a cost that esport leagues have and physical sport leagues do not.
Further down on the page is
* LGP does not support viewing/recording/streaming of HDCP protected signals
Do the major video game consoles use HDCP on their output? I know OUYA does, and in my opinion, inability to share gameplay videos was a significant part of what caused OUYA to fizzle out.
These numbers exclude satellite, which is available nearly everywhere but has high latency and often low data caps.
I think its a viable option.
Satellite Internet has monthly caps comparable to cellular. Would you want to drop your wired Internet and switch solely to mobile broadband, and then just eat the overage on each of your PCs when Microsoft or Canonical pushes the big six-month upgrade? Just because others are doesn't mean it's a good idea.
(a) could show you had sufficient financial backing to be a viable concern
What are the common ways for startups to show (a)?
(b) agreed to cover at least a large portion of the city, if not all, and weren't just going to cherry-pick affluent neighborhoods
Is a franchisee allowed to propose a multi-year plan to cover "a large portion of the city", using revenue from one neighborhood to fund expansion into adjacent neighborhoods, or does it have to be at least borough-wide from day one?
Some DSL connections use PPPoE. Others use a proprietary variant of PPPoE, which requires a connect program that's often not available for Linux PCs or for the stripped down operating systems in game consoles.
One problem with gaming on a tablet is that compared to a joystick and buttons that gives tactile feedback when an action is input, a flat sheet of glass gives far less feedback. Thus many genres need to have their control schemes completely rethought for a flat sheet of glass. Do your kids use an external Bluetooth controller with their tablets? If not, do they stick to point-and-click games or 1- or 2-button continuous runners?
Then what's the practical solution for a small developer, without the staff to support its app(s) on five different platforms simultaneously, to reach users?
Open data protocols/services/formats published and controlled by an international organization is the answer.
That'd make sense if the Web Bluetooth Community Group didn't plan to eventually submit Web Bluetooth to W3C after the Chrome team finds and fixes any practical problems discovered during this field trial. As far as I can tell, a new technology has to be implemented in at least two browsers before W3C will consider it for inclusion in the HTML standard.
You just disable JavaScript using something like NoScript
And then watch sites start requiring JavaScript to view any articles. Googlebot runs scripts nowadays, and I'm told other general-purpose web search engines like Bing and Yandex are collateral damage.
How do you make this work on an unrooted phone, other than by selling it and buying a rootable phone?
Apple actually tried to sell a set of amplified speakers back in the heyday of the iPod, and it was a dismal failure. Not because they sucked (they didn't); but because it just wasn't the right product for Apple.
Apple has since bought Beats. What does that change?
How much longer before Android devices start appearing without the jack?
For the near future, the royalty for a sound card with a USB C plug will probably be far less than the royalty for a sound card with a Lightning plug.
Ever watch a video with BT lag? It's unbearable.
Even if the (noninteractive) video is delayed by exactly the number of frames to compensate for a particular Bluetooth audio device's lag? That'd affect pause and seek controls, but not the majority of playback.
When the speaker/headphone that accepts digital input only is sealed by the manufacturer
Which manufacturer has announced plans to manufacture such a sealed speaker/headphone?
There will be phones with headphone jacks out there because people want them.
That's what they said about QWERTY keyboards on phones, and now look where we are.
If I go into a grocery store, music is playing over the PA system when associates aren't making announcements. Part of my grocery bill goes toward the royalty for this music. So how can I practically avoid listening and avoid paying?
How long until video game publishers start flooding ocremix.org with takedowns for unauthorized use of their copyrighted musical compositions?
That's what we actually need. A browser that actually lies to the ad networks and content providers about what's displayed.
That kills the cap avoidance use case of ad blocking, unless the "lying" is done on some proxy server in a datacenter like with Opera Mini. Then Facebook can just block said proxies' IPs.
I was suggesting that the person running the app on their LAN register a domain name and get an SSL cert for it.
So if an app gets a million users, each of these users would have to think of a domain name that doesn't already exist and then pay $15 to register it plus the cost of hosting public dynamic DNS for that domain so that Let's Encrypt can verify it. A lot of the DNS hosting plans that popular registrars bundle <cough>GoDaddy</cough> do not support dynamic DNS; instead, the domain owner is expected to log in with a name and password and use a web form to edit records in the zone file.
That means the domain would have to be publicly accessible for the Let's Encrypt registration process, but wouldn't need to stick around indefinitely
The domain and the public dynamic DNS would need to stick around as long as the user continues to use the app, as Let's Encrypt certificates expire after 90 days.
So does SIGINT send a SIGINT (Ctrl+C) to the private sector's privacy throughout the English-speaking world?
From the Army's FOUO fact sheet:
For Official Use Only is part of Controlled Unclassified Information, which is above public but below Confidential. CUI would probably be censored out of any FOIA response in the same way as someone else's health records.
Believe it or not, LTE doesn't meet the 4G requirements.
Am I the only person who read "4G LTE" as "4G Lite" and saw it as a subtle admission that LTE doesn't meet the IMT Advanced requirements? (LTE Advanced and WiMAX Release 2 are expected to meet them.)
WiMax deployment would be a step up.
Then why did Sprint switch away from Mobile WiMAX?
Holy krap 30+ gb a month, what the hell is she doing to use that much?
I use 60 GB/mo on my cable at home, much of it from updating my devices' operating systems and applications and watching short videos in SD. If cellular and satellite ISPs want subscribers to drop their cable for wireless, they're going to have to increase the data cap dramatically.
Radio waves wobble but the networks don't fall down.
In the 5G future, Weebles deliver your mail.
In-app streaming is garbage, get an AVerMedia Gamer Portable
The first thing on the product description page is a boxed, all-caps notice:
Because video games are audiovisual works, their output is protected by copyright. Nintendo used copyright against MLG in 2010, and other publishers have the right to use it again in the future. Even with publishers that are willing to license their games for streaming, such as Nintendo nowadays, a royalty for the game itself is a cost that esport leagues have and physical sport leagues do not.
Further down on the page is
Do the major video game consoles use HDCP on their output? I know OUYA does, and in my opinion, inability to share gameplay videos was a significant part of what caused OUYA to fizzle out.
You are correct that Unity used its own plug-in instead of Flash. But browser publishers are already breaking the Unity plug-in and all other plug-ins other than Flash Player.
These numbers exclude satellite, which is available nearly everywhere but has high latency and often low data caps.
I think its a viable option.
Satellite Internet has monthly caps comparable to cellular. Would you want to drop your wired Internet and switch solely to mobile broadband, and then just eat the overage on each of your PCs when Microsoft or Canonical pushes the big six-month upgrade? Just because others are doesn't mean it's a good idea.
(a) could show you had sufficient financial backing to be a viable concern
What are the common ways for startups to show (a)?
(b) agreed to cover at least a large portion of the city, if not all, and weren't just going to cherry-pick affluent neighborhoods
Is a franchisee allowed to propose a multi-year plan to cover "a large portion of the city", using revenue from one neighborhood to fund expansion into adjacent neighborhoods, or does it have to be at least borough-wide from day one?
Some DSL connections use PPPoE. Others use a proprietary variant of PPPoE, which requires a connect program that's often not available for Linux PCs or for the stripped down operating systems in game consoles.
Will I actually get to watch some dogs in the next Watch Dogs?
One problem with gaming on a tablet is that compared to a joystick and buttons that gives tactile feedback when an action is input, a flat sheet of glass gives far less feedback. Thus many genres need to have their control schemes completely rethought for a flat sheet of glass. Do your kids use an external Bluetooth controller with their tablets? If not, do they stick to point-and-click games or 1- or 2-button continuous runners?
Then what's the practical solution for a small developer, without the staff to support its app(s) on five different platforms simultaneously, to reach users?
Open data protocols/services/formats published and controlled by an international organization is the answer.
That'd make sense if the Web Bluetooth Community Group didn't plan to eventually submit Web Bluetooth to W3C after the Chrome team finds and fixes any practical problems discovered during this field trial. As far as I can tell, a new technology has to be implemented in at least two browsers before W3C will consider it for inclusion in the HTML standard.