Speculative execution has been a mainstay of both RISC and CISC cpu designs since the 80â(TM)s. Intel were one of the last CPU producers to implement speculative execution. IBM power chips, sun sparc chips, Motorola 16k chips, they all had speculative execution 10-20 years before intel introduced it in the pentium pro.
Seriously? RISC was supposed to be simple originally. It used to be pipelined, but speculated? Pentium Pro came out in 1995. You're claiming that POWER, SPARC and 68k had this in 1985 at the latest? Well, let's check the facts: SPARC was first released in 1987, POWER1 came out in 1990, in 1985, Motorola had the 68020. Only the 88110 introduced speculation in 1991
and have you eve considered how many more additional opcodes are required to run to emulate one single opcode for different architecture
That greatly depends on the similarity of the two architectures and the cleverness of the dynamic translator, so it's impossible to make a blanket statement.
My phone has a Snapdragon 850 with 4x1.5GHz + 4x2GHz cores, 3 gigs of RAM, and 128 gigs of eMMC SSD. Frankly, Acrobat Viewer runs faster on an ancient, creaky 15 year old Compaq Armada m700 with 500mhz Pentium III, 512mb, and a noname PATA SSD from China (that probabiy has microSD cards hand-soldered to an ASIC inside) than it does on my phone.
And your phone and the PC are otherwise running the same OS?
Not necessarily. True, a high quality implementation is going to be large because quality emulators are compilers, but there might be great demand for x86-on-ARM emulators and therefore a correspondingly large funding for those efforts.
Years before Tesla was an idea, there were already small networks of hydrogen fuel stations in some places in Europe and in United States.
And they still are...small, that is. Mostly because hydrogen is either an either failed or at least very premature technological bet from the investors. Picking the right stuff to do is very important.
But there's no technical need to do any of those in a night time camera. Those are artifacts of cheap designs, not limitations on the light capturing technology.
Slashdot Mirror
Speculative execution has been a mainstay of both RISC and CISC cpu designs since the 80â(TM)s. Intel were one of the last CPU producers to implement speculative execution. IBM power chips, sun sparc chips, Motorola 16k chips, they all had speculative execution 10-20 years before intel introduced it in the pentium pro.
Seriously? RISC was supposed to be simple originally. It used to be pipelined, but speculated? Pentium Pro came out in 1995. You're claiming that POWER, SPARC and 68k had this in 1985 at the latest? Well, let's check the facts: SPARC was first released in 1987, POWER1 came out in 1990, in 1985, Motorola had the 68020. Only the 88110 introduced speculation in 1991
Stop. Lying.
Wrong, 100 GW of solar power at about 20% capacity factor is about 6.3e17 joules of annual output, which is about 2% of 775 Mtoe = ~3.25e19 joules.
and have you eve considered how many more additional opcodes are required to run to emulate one single opcode for different architecture
That greatly depends on the similarity of the two architectures and the cleverness of the dynamic translator, so it's impossible to make a blanket statement.
Because you're comparing two different programs at that point, not one program on two CPU architectures.
That depends. Are you from Indonesia?
This will get interesting when computers get sentient and start claiming that they believe to have bugs inside them.
My phone has a Snapdragon 850 with 4x1.5GHz + 4x2GHz cores, 3 gigs of RAM, and 128 gigs of eMMC SSD. Frankly, Acrobat Viewer runs faster on an ancient, creaky 15 year old Compaq Armada m700 with 500mhz Pentium III, 512mb, and a noname PATA SSD from China (that probabiy has microSD cards hand-soldered to an ASIC inside) than it does on my phone.
And your phone and the PC are otherwise running the same OS?
I didn't know the books had imagery.
Not necessarily. True, a high quality implementation is going to be large because quality emulators are compilers, but there might be great demand for x86-on-ARM emulators and therefore a correspondingly large funding for those efforts.
I suspect your fembot might be a robosexual.
No they are limitations of display.
But there's no "display" in self-driving car's "brain". Only an FP framebuffer which doesn't have these limitations.
Also you want to capture realtime video in HDR with almost no compression?
You're *not* trying to store it so it's irrelevant what a dashcam can or cannot do. (Your brain is not trying to store it either after all.)
What's a "living LOL" and why wouldn't a dead one suffice?
Uh, you can't detect irony?
It's like looking into the Sun. You get blind and you won't see anything afterwards ever again. 110010001000 is the sun of irony.
Fake news!
Years before Tesla was an idea, there were already small networks of hydrogen fuel stations in some places in Europe and in United States.
And they still are...small, that is. Mostly because hydrogen is either an either failed or at least very premature technological bet from the investors. Picking the right stuff to do is very important.
But there's no technical need to do any of those in a night time camera. Those are artifacts of cheap designs, not limitations on the light capturing technology.
Yes, I'm wrong about CCDs being much more sensitive than human eyes and that's apparently why astronomers switched back to human eyes. Oh, wait...
You're an idiot and a blind Uber defender
I'm saying that Uber uses shit cameras and therefore I'm a Uber defender? You should have your head checked.
In a Beowulf cluster of Soviet Russias
Also known as the Comonwealth of Independent States.
I don't "assume" it. I know it is because we can measure it.
You have no clue how poor the human eye is and how good a digital replica is, do you?
That teleporters are perfect for gingers?
Human eye works way better
It shouldn't. Silicon devices should be much more sensitive than human eyes. Someone cheaped out?
I think there's a missing algebraic term for non-isosceles triangles.
PVWatts is my argument. What is yours?