You won't find a more vibrant, active, and a fair democracy any where else. America should start getting used to the fact that democracy has evolved a bit in two hundred years.
JFK, terminal 4 ( site of Singapore, Kuwait, Pakistan, Egypt, Israel national airlines, among others ) had been displaying an iris scanning machine for the past year or so. It is about 12 feet high and looks sexy.
Gut reaction: 1) Oh, my god, this is awful!
2) Probably won't work
Of course, there might be a not so subtle message being sent here. Why terminal 4?
Perhaps it is the general preference for the printed page that gives the electronic release its power. It may tease the reader into buying the whole book later on. Also, it can't hurt the buzz.
Of course some say print is dead. But if print is dead then so too is the novel. No one wants to read 300 plus pages on a screen. And more importantly, no one wants to re-read a novel on screen. Very little interaction with the object there. No sense of "consumption."
Literary theory is an approach to textuality. If you posit that all knowledge that enters public sphere exists as text, then a study of the manipulation of meaning, knowledge, and interpretation is as politically necessary a venture as any I know.
And while one may complain that excessive jargon corrupts scholarship, we live in a world of jargon, coded language uttered by people with AUTHORity. It is the job of discourse theory to puncture the very heart of such authority. Thus, there are real world implications here. In fact, the whole project is being imported to secondary schools precisely because the goal of schools is to make questioning thinkers, not believers. Literary theory is a marvelous way to exercise such faculties.
Deconstruction is the most famous (and misused) reference to literary theory. It is the one most often used as an illustration of diffuse, pointless inquiry. If every person who studies theory hasn't heard this said a thousand times, then we have never heard it once. Frankly, this article it is just an immature attempt to contribute to field with an already substantial knowledge base.
Of course, as a newbie who has wrestled with the install process for Debian quite a few times, screwing up and freaking out, it has been the REAL education I always wanted.
And it is the dumbing down of windows that drove me away. What kind of opinion can one have of human beings if you believe that you must always make it easier for them. Some people are smart. Some liked to be challenged, so long as it is not fruitless.
My machine is humming in a way I always dreamed it would. It took me a little over a year to go from totally uninformed (not even knowing what Linux was) to basically informed. When I look at windows with all their pictures and random names for the system functions, I can see the low opinion developers must have for the non-technical masses.
The world of convenience is not unquestionably better for all. Sometimes it just makes us weak.
Slashdot Mirror
1) It is not a run-on. It is a complex sentence with three subordinate clauses and one independent clause. The independent clause is a question.
2) There is no such thing as a"little" run-on
3) correcting someone's grammar is rude.
4) I am rude
here, here!
You won't find a more vibrant, active, and a fair democracy any where else. America should start getting used to the fact that democracy has evolved a bit in two hundred years.
JFK, terminal 4 ( site of Singapore, Kuwait, Pakistan, Egypt, Israel national airlines, among others ) had been displaying an iris scanning machine for the past year or so. It is about 12 feet high and looks sexy.
Gut reaction:
1) Oh, my god, this is awful!
2) Probably won't work
Of course, there might be a not so subtle message being sent here. Why terminal 4?
Perhaps it is the general preference for the printed page that gives the electronic release its power. It may tease the reader into buying the whole book later on. Also, it can't hurt the buzz.
Of course some say print is dead. But if print is dead then so too is the novel. No one wants to read 300 plus pages on a screen. And more importantly, no one wants to re-read a novel on screen. Very little interaction with the object there. No sense of "consumption."
This article simplifies a much larger issue.
Literary theory is an approach to textuality. If you posit that all knowledge that enters public sphere exists as text, then a study of the manipulation of meaning, knowledge, and interpretation is as politically necessary a venture as any I know.
And while one may complain that excessive jargon corrupts scholarship, we live in a world of jargon, coded language uttered by people with AUTHORity. It is the job of discourse theory to puncture the very heart of such authority. Thus, there are real world implications here. In fact, the whole project is being imported to secondary schools precisely because the goal of schools is to make questioning thinkers, not believers. Literary theory is a marvelous way to exercise such faculties.
Deconstruction is the most famous (and misused) reference to literary theory. It is the one most often used as an illustration of diffuse, pointless inquiry. If every person who studies theory hasn't heard this said a thousand times, then we have never heard it once. Frankly, this article it is just an immature attempt to contribute to field with an already substantial knowledge base.
This article adds nothing to it.
Of course, as a newbie who has wrestled with the install process for Debian quite a few times, screwing up and freaking out, it has been the REAL education I always wanted.
And it is the dumbing down of windows that drove me away. What kind of opinion can one have of human beings if you believe that you must always make it easier for them. Some people are smart. Some liked to be challenged, so long as it is not fruitless.
My machine is humming in a way I always dreamed it would. It took me a little over a year to go from totally uninformed (not even knowing what Linux was) to basically informed. When I look at windows with all their pictures and random names for the system functions, I can see the low opinion developers must have for the non-technical masses. The world of convenience is not unquestionably better for all. Sometimes it just makes us weak.