It's been that way since the federal government decided that it's powers superceded the states, in spite of the obvious contradiction in the Constitution.
Lucy, their three-year-old, has Spina bifida and is confined to a wheelchair.
The family managed to make it through the TSA checkpoint without any problems. But as they prepared to walk to their gate, a TSA agent pulled aside Lucy for additional screening measures.
“They specifically told me that they were singling her out for this special treatment because she’s in a wheelchair,”
Slashdot Mirror
Comparison of 200 calorie serving for lots of different foods.
http://www.ufunk.net/en/food/200-calories/
That's one big plate of broccoli.
Or, he's trying to irritate you people who keep trying to correct an obvious sarcasm.
And he's doing a pretty good job at it.
They thought of it. They just didn't want to pay for it.
I was hoping the big dog would throw one of those chihuahuas from "Beverly Hills Chihuahua".
I would love to see how far it would go.
I don't think that last word means what you think it means.
Who cares about theoreticals?
TWC has lower bandwidth, higher price, AND caps.
Google has higher bandwidth, lower price and NO caps.
I think it's more a matter of price:
TWC top tier cost - 50 Mbps @ $80/mo (introductory price!)
Google Fiber - 1 Gbps @ $70/mo
Now, which one would any reasonable person want?
Yeah, in 1776. And it was 'people', not people. 'people' = white landowners.
Depends on *their* definition of off-topic. Which is the whole problem.
Is date rape drugs in the hacker world off-topic? Not if it's being used to hack into places.
Not quite.
It's been that way since the federal government decided that it's powers superceded the states, in spite of the obvious contradiction in the Constitution.
He scared them because he had information on them doing illegal things, and threatened to release it. Not because of the pea shooters.
It's not the call monitoring that's the problem.
It's that there's no limits and no consequences to monitoring because of 'national security'.
And more than just one administration, or even side of the aisle.
It's more of an un-coordinated play to take away our rights.
And it's working very well. Pretty sure both sides of the aisle would agree with that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx_CIWS#Operation
All it needs is power and cooling water. No human interaction required.
Probably only billionaire citizens.
You want a Bill Gates model?
" with no intentional lost of human life."
Yeah, as long as the wining side chooses not to wipe out the humans on the losing side, since they'll have no robot protection anymore.
I'm sure that'll never happen.
But IS covered in tasty red sauce!
I don't think there has been any correlation between higher cancer rates and the communities around that facility
#ScienceFail
They're drunk AND parasite free?
And apparently, smarter than you.
Can you show me where the Constitution says there can't be limitations on the arms that you have a right to bear?
The right to bear is not being infringed. Only the definition of arms.
Uh, no.
Colorado's proposed legislation is limiting magazines to 15 for rifles, 8 for shotguns.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/us/gun-control-laws-clear-initial-hurdle-in-colorado.html?_r=0
Maybe it's you who needs to stop misrepresenting?
Pretty sure the TSA wins that losers' game.
http://now.msn.com/lucy-forck-three-year-old-with-spina-bifida-singled-out-for-tsa-screening
Lucy, their three-year-old, has Spina bifida and is confined to a wheelchair.
The family managed to make it through the TSA checkpoint without any problems. But as they prepared to walk to their gate, a TSA agent pulled aside Lucy for additional screening measures.
“They specifically told me that they were singling her out for this special treatment because she’s in a wheelchair,”
I don't know what you're saying there.
&$@*â licking %*@& £^#%er
Pretty sure most of the states are going to beat him to it.
Hmm, it's almost like a majority of the population is ok with it.
Damn politicians, bending to their whims.