Not that I'm arguing with the principle of what they're saying, but when your argument says: "And most people who remain in their right mind would have no problem doing a "whois" on the Domain Name..." don't really understand who 'most people' really are. Or why Ford (or anyone) might at least have a problem with what they did.
LOL, apparently you missed that I didn't include iPod touch. I didn't bother finding numbers, as they're mixed in with plain iPods. Still, more than enough to put Apple over Nintendo. In half the time.
Lets see how many ways you're wrong. First off, try using numbers from 2013. Seriously, you missed by 50M iPhones and 25M iPads in the Christmas quarter alone.
iPad - 120 M sold iPhone - 318M sold
Just those two alone are ~450M. In the last 5 years
Slashdot Mirror
Goodbye your privacy, goodbye open source. Now every component needs to be verified that it is "trusted".
Only if you want to watch their movies.
Step 0 - never do anything that's put on the wayback machine.
http://archive.org/web/web.php
Also, a better name might be:
ForDevil.com
Could also be capitalized like:
FordEvil.com
What legal standing do you think he has in order to go to any court with?
He doesn't get to force anything. He has no legal standing for this website.
He didn't register it. He didn't create it. He didn't update it. He didn't do anything for it.
It doesn't matter if it's a pro-Ron Paul website, a farcical Ron Paul website, or pointing out all of his errors.
It's not his.
Really? Do you even know what the term cybersquatter means? Cause you might want to go look it up.
Just because his name is Ron Paul does not mean he gets to force ronpaul.com to be handed over to him. REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE WEBSITE IS ABOUT.
It doesn't matter if it's a pro-Ron Paul website, a farcical Ron Paul website, or pointing out all of his errors.
He didn't register it. He didn't create it. He didn't update it. He didn't do anything for it.
It's not his.
Really?
Just because his name is Ron Paul does not mean he gets to force ronpaul.com to be handed over to him. REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE WEBSITE IS ABOUT.
Not that I'm arguing with the principle of what they're saying, but when your argument says:
"And most people who remain in their right mind would have no problem doing a "whois" on the Domain Name..."
don't really understand who 'most people' really are. Or why Ford (or anyone) might at least have a problem with what they did.
He doesn't have a legal right to deal with it.
That's the hypocrisy of it all.
Is that worse than ignoring the cost and focusing only on the measurable good of government programs?
Sounds like every politician, on both sides of the aisle.
It's kind of a might makes right vs possession is 9/10ths of the law argument.
Also, these aren't domain squatters. They're actively using it ... to promote Ron Paul.
the domain name is his name, which is presumably his property
What kind of stupid logic is that?
Does everyone named Antonio own all the Antonio's pizzerias?
My name is the same as a semi-famous musician. Do I get all his royalties since I'm about 6 months older than him?
Where will that kind of 'logic' end!?!?
Especially if you're a sysadmin who has to mange installation & updates.
http://www.bynkii.com/archives/2013/02/wtf_flash.html
LOL, apparently you missed that I didn't include iPod touch. I didn't bother finding numbers, as they're mixed in with plain iPods. Still, more than enough to put Apple over Nintendo. In half the time.
The key word in my comment? "IS"
Meaning it's current run rate is > 100M ipads per year. Meaning it's ramping upwards. Here's a graph of it for you.
http://twitter.yfrog.com/g0781qp
And here's one for cumulative growth.
http://twitter.yfrog.com/mn3oebp
As of Dec 31, 2012, total sales were 121 M. So lets see where they are on Dec 31, 2013.
All versions of Playstation (in 15 years) ~ All versions of JUST the iPhone (in 5 years)
All versions of the Xbox (in 12 years) http://aaplinvestors.net/stats/iphonevsipod/
But, yeah, my comments are stupid.
Lets see how many ways you're wrong. First off, try using numbers from 2013. Seriously, you missed by 50M iPhones and 25M iPads in the Christmas quarter alone.
iPad - 120 M sold
iPhone - 318M sold
Just those two alone are ~450M. In the last 5 years
http://aaplinvestors.net/stats/iphonevsipod/
Then you have a shitty dog.
My lab can carry half of my camping gear most of the day.
Uptake being higher WAS EXACTLY MY POINT you gamerloser. Apple sold 23M iPads last quarter. Did Nintendo ever sell that many devices in any one year?
http://twitter.yfrog.com/mn3oebp
Exactly how long until iOS (if you want to compare all devices) reaches 760M?
A year at most.
But, yeah, headshot or something. Spend another hour 'researching' more numbers.
So what?
Compare all time vs all time.
I don't know. Go look it up.
But I'm pretty sure that that won't make up that much volume.
No, China has the #1 market share. But not the #1 quarterly sales share. See the 1 child law.
Lol. So clueless.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/autocad-ws/id393149734?mt=8
LOL. The Wii has sold less than 100M units. All time. The iPad is doing more than that, per year.
Why does the study need to offer a mechanism?
Why can't they just present facts?
We fed the same amount of calories of both HFCS and sucrose to two groups of rats.
The HCFS rats were much fatter, with worse health problems.
That's enough of a point to produce a paper.