I already do this, but it's compressed down to about 15 GB, which works just fine for the screens in a car/van. And it's on my ipod, plugged into the A/V port in the van.
I'm in a similar situation. My real name is that of a country singer. Thus very little online is attributable to me. Even if you narrow down searches, it's still hard not to have the singer overwhelm the results.
It may be security through obscurity, but it is one level of protection.
The base OS for both Lion and Lion Server are exactly the same, so Server is built on the base OS. Identical systems across the entire platform, one has a few extras. What about that DOESN'T seem IT friendly? And it costs $50. If you need to request funding for that, then there's no helping you.
Needs to have some kind of hardware / software road map
Why? What use it that? Current desktop systems will suffice, plan for three years of use. Why do you NEED to know what else is coming?
Budgets. And PHBs - The people who control how the money is spent. If you don't understand this, you've never worked in a business that's hesitant about Macs.
Let MAC OS server run on ANY VM
That would be good, not sure what the license is like on that now... it would make a lot of sense since they don't have the XServe anymore.
Only licensed, supported VM is VMware 5 which says it requires host OS *and* guest OSes to be running on Xserves. Which flat out sucks.
Except the actual hardware that a certified, supported VM can run on is no longer sold. What now? I really want to know, because I want OSXS virtualized AND moveable between various VM boxes.
You really don't understand Apple's business model at all.
1. Mobile business is profitable because of hardware. You can't just apply that to desktops.
2. Apple makes their decisions pretty much independent of their customers, especially corporate users. See xServe demise.
3. Mobile will always be profitable for Apple because they'll always be moving forward, staying in the profitable end of the development envelope. They leave the low end, commoditized market for others to have - HTC, Dell, etc.
Slashdot Mirror
I already do this, but it's compressed down to about 15 GB, which works just fine for the screens in a car/van. And it's on my ipod, plugged into the A/V port in the van.
I have, many times.
Granted, they weren't my kids, or in my car, but still...
Does a crudely drawn circle mean goatse?
Now updated:
Why do Chinese gamers do it doggy-style? So they can have kids to sell while both playing games.
I see you haven't heard the Canadian/doggy style joke.
How can you miss using Abby Normal?
I'm in a similar situation. My real name is that of a country singer. Thus very little online is attributable to me. Even if you narrow down searches, it's still hard not to have the singer overwhelm the results.
It may be security through obscurity, but it is one level of protection.
Species, yes. Individuals, no.
Or leaning over??
That's unpossible! It could literally NEVER happen!!
" IT doesn't care about share price and earnings, as long as they're both positive numbers and not trending downward"
You might want to go look at any other vendor's numbers then...
The base OS for both Lion and Lion Server are exactly the same, so Server is built on the base OS. Identical systems across the entire platform, one has a few extras. What about that DOESN'T seem IT friendly? And it costs $50. If you need to request funding for that, then there's no helping you.
Go educate yourself:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/server/
Didn't see that on your list of requirements.
But thanks for showing your ignorance about Macs once more.
Those numbers seem a bit low. But you have a good argument!
Perhaps you should run for Congress.
*This post does not follow your rule.*
Needs to have some kind of hardware / software road map
Why? What use it that? Current desktop systems will suffice, plan for three years of use. Why do you NEED to know what else is coming?
Budgets. And PHBs - The people who control how the money is spent. If you don't understand this, you've never worked in a business that's hesitant about Macs.
Let MAC OS server run on ANY VM
That would be good, not sure what the license is like on that now... it would make a lot of sense since they don't have the XServe anymore.
Only licensed, supported VM is VMware 5 which says it requires host OS *and* guest OSes to be running on Xserves. Which flat out sucks.
Except the actual hardware that a certified, supported VM can run on is no longer sold. What now? I really want to know, because I want OSXS virtualized AND moveable between various VM boxes.
They already have all that, you ignorant ass-hat.
And have for at least 5 years now.
Want to not be ignorant? Try reading the docs on Mac OS X Server.
You really don't understand Apple's business model at all.
1. Mobile business is profitable because of hardware. You can't just apply that to desktops.
2. Apple makes their decisions pretty much independent of their customers, especially corporate users. See xServe demise.
3. Mobile will always be profitable for Apple because they'll always be moving forward, staying in the profitable end of the development envelope. They leave the low end, commoditized market for others to have - HTC, Dell, etc.
Texas?
If it works for Apple, it's a moof rock.
If it's black, it's a Moor rock.
And if it has black & white spots, it's a moo rock?
why don't they just hold her in jail while they brute force the password?
You don't think that's what she's already been threatened with?
LANL says you're wrong.
http://www.lanl.gov/science/weapons_journal/index.shtml
Anthony Weiner is up for it!