So let's say I roll down to a garage sale and find the band Poison's worst songs of the 1980s on vinyl for two pence (that's two pence more than it's worth). By your logic, is it okay for me to now get online and download that?
Given the first sale doctrine, yes.
And even from a moralistic point of view, yes. I bought a copy of the music (yes a copy, not a license). I can use it in any format I see fit for my personal use.
Or an Xserve RAID that can hold 14TB - rack w/o drives can be had for about $500. 14 slots. Dual power, dual fiber channel, dual battery backup, dual ethernet.
Guess what? Flash doesn't run on Android right now either (beta only, released *maybe* this year). Or BlackberryOS. That makes up about 90% of the smartphone market.
This infection is a windows virus that runs on the windows machine, then tries to identify information being sent from the windows machine to the iPad, disguised as an iTunes update. It's a classic man-in-the-middle attack.
That's hysterical because it's true. An HR person wouldn't see that he breached security protocol and lost a device. They would see he worked on the new shiny!
They haven't even finished the hardware or software for it - according to their own site! No way they're getting this out the door this year. Heck, they even say to get an iPad now.
And really complaining that you have to buy a computer to build software is a REALLY whiny position. You have to buy a computer for Android or MS apps as well. It's just not coming out of your pocket directly. But if you did real development, you'd buy yourself a computer regardless of what platform you chose. And if you develop apps worth paying for, the price you pay for a computer probably is not going to affect you.
You really think that Apple didn't tell Adobe to knock off what they were doing?
You really think that Adobe tried to work with Apple to get their software onto the iPhone?
You really think that large corporations that have products intimately tied together don't talk regularly?
Adobe said 'We want to do this'. Apple said 'No freaking way'. Adobe said 'We're doing it anyway'. Apple changed the rules to make it against the license to do so.
"Because the JavaWS technology is included in the Java Runtime Environment, which is used by all of the major browsers, the vulnerability affects all of these applications, including Firefox, Internet Explorer and Chrome, on all versions of Windows from 2000 through Windows 7, Santamarta said. Browsers running on Apple's Mac OS X are not vulnerable."
Slashdot Mirror
So let's say I roll down to a garage sale and find the band Poison's worst songs of the 1980s on vinyl for two pence (that's two pence more than it's worth). By your logic, is it okay for me to now get online and download that?
Given the first sale doctrine, yes.
And even from a moralistic point of view, yes. I bought a copy of the music (yes a copy, not a license). I can use it in any format I see fit for my personal use.
Or an Xserve RAID that can hold 14TB - rack w/o drives can be had for about $500. 14 slots. Dual power, dual fiber channel, dual battery backup, dual ethernet.
I posted this above, but here's several examples not only of decent games - Pacman, Tetris - but how to build them as well.
http://www.kesiev.com/akihabara/
Unless there's a security issue...
http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20081007/clickjacking-details/
See issue #2a, 2b.
Is this good enough for you?
http://www.kesiev.com/akihabara/
Pacman, Tetris, etc.
Norton would slow the VMs down too much....
Guess what? Flash doesn't run on Android right now either (beta only, released *maybe* this year). Or BlackberryOS. That makes up about 90% of the smartphone market.
Either way, it's byebye Flash.
I know I'm feeding a troll here, but...
So, you're ok with theft, but not ok with Apple saying how to develop for their platform - which you can choose to do or not.
Just like the iPhone right????
Whoops!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IPhone_sales_per_quarter.svg
Yep, and it works great.
This infection is a windows virus that runs on the windows machine, then tries to identify information being sent from the windows machine to the iPad, disguised as an iTunes update. It's a classic man-in-the-middle attack.
That's hysterical because it's true. An HR person wouldn't see that he breached security protocol and lost a device. They would see he worked on the new shiny!
So he sees what people want - better than just about anyone, and he's not a visionary?
No. The hospital super-bugs - staph or strep. Because they show evolution in action.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_bug_(bacteria)
I'm pretty sure you could replace Arab/Muslim with any side/race/country, and be correct.
It's the bad side of the human condition.
Yes, they are being criticized, and rightly so.
If Microsoft can detect the rootkit, they can fix it...BEFORE running the patch. It really can't be that hard.
Destroying them like this?
http://lilysussman.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/im-sorry-but-we-blew-up-your-laptop-welcome-to-israel/
What are the odds they charged her for the 3 bullets?
And every time the company mentions it, they're pushing back the introduction another quarter.
http://www.notionink.in/news.php
They haven't even finished the hardware or software for it - according to their own site! No way they're getting this out the door this year.
Heck, they even say to get an iPad now.
No, not vaporware at all. /sarcasm
Wouldn't that last one be the theyPad??
I think I got her number too!
8675 309
Here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/APPLE-MAC-MINI-INTEL-CORE-DUO-1-66GHz-1GB-80GB-DVD-RW_W0QQitemZ140397511893QQcmdZViewItemQQptZApple_Desktops?hash=item20b05804d5#ht_502wt_1167
I just saved you $900.
And really complaining that you have to buy a computer to build software is a REALLY whiny position. You have to buy a computer for Android or MS apps as well. It's just not coming out of your pocket directly. But if you did real development, you'd buy yourself a computer regardless of what platform you chose. And if you develop apps worth paying for, the price you pay for a computer probably is not going to affect you.
Some marketshare?
More like 1/3 of their revenue.
Adobe would hurt themselves much more than they would ever hurt Apple who has expanded their business to much more than just graphic professionals.
Apple changed the rules without telling Adobe
You really think that Apple didn't tell Adobe to knock off what they were doing?
You really think that Adobe tried to work with Apple to get their software onto the iPhone?
You really think that large corporations that have products intimately tied together don't talk regularly?
Adobe said 'We want to do this'. Apple said 'No freaking way'. Adobe said 'We're doing it anyway'. Apple changed the rules to make it against the license to do so.
From the first link:
"Because the JavaWS technology is included in the Java Runtime Environment, which is used by all of the major browsers, the vulnerability affects all of these applications, including Firefox, Internet Explorer and Chrome, on all versions of Windows from 2000 through Windows 7, Santamarta said. Browsers running on Apple's Mac OS X are not vulnerable."
You'd be funnier too if you had any sense of history.
http://thinkexist.com/quotation/once_is_happenstance-twice_is_coincidence-three/220863.html
1. How does getting a lot of email 'disrupt a court proceeding'? Specifically, ~300 emails.
2. Define private email. What if the judge's email was a gmail account? What if it was anything but a mail server he, himself, hosted?
3. The actual issue was on his federal computer, so it was his federal government email. Does that change your mind?
4. His email, or at least one with his name on it, is on the Illinois US District Court website.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/ktla-pitchman-sentenced-to-prison,0,5512411.story
Now, I think Trudeau got nice bit of karma from this biting him in the ass, but I don't think it was legal.