It's gone from two weeks ago, being completely ridiculous that anyone in the Trump campaign having any kind of meeting with Russians of a non-trivial nature to yeah, we did, but it wasn't illegal.
I'm sure if they continue investigating and find that the Trump campaign did work together with the Russian gov't and Putin was sending Donald bags of cash, you'll go "Well, so what. Anything to prevent Clinton from being elected."
Jr, Kushner and Manafort, going into the meeting, all were expecting to meet a agent for the Russian government, to get dirt on Hillary from the agent, and jumped at chance for this meeting.
Why would it matter if she is a registered foreign agent, or she was or was not an agent for the Russian government.
This meeting is something that 2-3 weeks ago, The Donald would say is utterly ridiculous, that his son and son-in-law are both patriots that would never meet with a russian agent like this. Hell, based on Trumps comments like "Most people would have taken that meeting", Trump himself would have gone.
Anything to win.
Like Krauthammer wrote: "Bungled collusion is still collusion"
For you right and wrong are synonymous with legal and illegal. Whatever Trump and his family and his campaign do is right until a judge says "Guilty" and the prison door closes behind them. Therefore, all investigations of them should stop immediately.
It's totally find for Trump's son, son-in-law, and head of his campaign to meet with someone they all were informed ahead of time was an agent of the Russian gov't, which wanted to help his campaign, to give them dirt on Hillary.
Clearly, this is Obama's fault, because if one of his minions hadn't let the agent into the country, then they would have nobody to meet.
Nobody else besides Trump (and Putin I guess) is suggesting that their government should make a joint "cybersecurity" unit between their gov't and Russia to help prevent future cyber-attacks on their elections.
It was, as usual, something that popped into Trumps head (or perhaps was suggested by Putin), and Trump was mentally unable to figure out, by himself, that it was a bad idea.
We've elected a stupid, ignorant man simply because he is "different" and was on tv.
What "late to the game"? They were only late to copying the iPhone.
They had WinCE (pronounced "wince"), WAY before the iPhone was a gleam in SJ's eye. And when the iPhone was released, the head of Microsoft, at least publicly, dismissed it as a toy. Google at least pivoted to a touch-screen only UI when the iPhone was announced. Microsoft took years to switch.
I would volunteer to be one of the people who checks each breast to ensure it is not over-filled with this dangerous fluid, and assist with removing anything in excess of what is safe.
Not only that, but just seeing the source is no guarantee. The gov't would have to inspect the source AND compile it and then use that executable. As well as examine all the various virus definition files and only use the ones they have examined. And then somehow make sure Kaspersky isn't holding back some of them and isn't intentionally using an incorrect virus def file (say one that lets through a Russian gov't virus).
1. It's still enabled. You can't really turn it off, short of disconnecting the computer from the internet. 2. You still don't know exactly what Microsoft is transmitting to their servers. It's just "less than before". 3. There is no limit as to what is transmitted to their servers, nor will there be any notification or approval required when they decide to increase what is being transmitted to their servers.
Sorry, your comment assumes the final decision has not already been made. It has. He is just waiting for the time limit to expire and then the "decision" will be posted.
Judges are picked based on who they know, not what they know. If you happen to get a recent appointment to the bench, you have to HOPE that they are bothering to actually learn what the law happens to be w.r.t. the current case. There is almost no money spent on training, it's just assumed that since they are a lawyer, they know everything about all aspects of the law, both criminal and civil.
EG, the judge who made the "why can't you just keep your legs together to stop him from raping you"...
Statement made to children: "Daddy has to go to work now, because he has a dick payment to make. If I have to pay for it, it has to earn it's keep. Think about it kids. Not about my dick. About how I have to pay for you."
and they know there is fuck-all that the FBI can do about it.
The FBI won't be able to decrypt the computers and will want them for evidence, making it more time consuming and expensive to get back to work.
It's like walking around a corner and being sucker-punched by someone, and while you are on the ground, you see a cop out of the corner of your eye, you call out "Can you give me a hand up.", and the cop steps on your hand and replies "Not yet, I'm busy collecting evidence."
Yes, it can. While the code itself may not be altered in public, a company running that software to provide some service could be forced to run slightly different code.
Slashdot Mirror
Hello, new goalposts.
It's gone from two weeks ago, being completely ridiculous that anyone in the Trump campaign having any kind of meeting with Russians of a non-trivial nature to yeah, we did, but it wasn't illegal.
I'm sure if they continue investigating and find that the Trump campaign did work together with the Russian gov't and Putin was sending Donald bags of cash, you'll go "Well, so what. Anything to prevent Clinton from being elected."
So what?
Jr, Kushner and Manafort, going into the meeting, all were expecting to meet a agent for the Russian government, to get dirt on Hillary from the agent, and jumped at chance for this meeting.
Why would it matter if she is a registered foreign agent, or she was or was not an agent for the Russian government.
This meeting is something that 2-3 weeks ago, The Donald would say is utterly ridiculous, that his son and son-in-law are both patriots that would never meet with a russian agent like this. Hell, based on Trumps comments like "Most people would have taken that meeting", Trump himself would have gone.
Anything to win.
Like Krauthammer wrote: "Bungled collusion is still collusion"
Yeah, maybe we should make some kind of joint task force, where we have the Russians help us redesign our nuclear program, so they can't hack into it.
I understand.
For you right and wrong are synonymous with legal and illegal. Whatever Trump and his family and his campaign do is right until a judge says "Guilty" and the prison door closes behind them. Therefore, all investigations of them should stop immediately.
It's totally find for Trump's son, son-in-law, and head of his campaign to meet with someone they all were informed ahead of time was an agent of the Russian gov't, which wanted to help his campaign, to give them dirt on Hillary.
Clearly, this is Obama's fault, because if one of his minions hadn't let the agent into the country, then they would have nobody to meet.
Nobody else besides Trump (and Putin I guess) is suggesting that their government should make a joint "cybersecurity" unit between their gov't and Russia to help prevent future cyber-attacks on their elections.
It was, as usual, something that popped into Trumps head (or perhaps was suggested by Putin), and Trump was mentally unable to figure out, by himself, that it was a bad idea.
We've elected a stupid, ignorant man simply because he is "different" and was on tv.
What "late to the game"? They were only late to copying the iPhone.
They had WinCE (pronounced "wince"), WAY before the iPhone was a gleam in SJ's eye. And when the iPhone was released, the head of Microsoft, at least publicly, dismissed it as a toy. Google at least pivoted to a touch-screen only UI when the iPhone was announced. Microsoft took years to switch.
It is traditional to use the last million on coke and whores.
It's "Enhance and zoom in!"
Ok, done.
Now what?
I would volunteer to be one of the people who checks each breast to ensure it is not over-filled with this dangerous fluid, and assist with removing anything in excess of what is safe.
You need to use a tracking-blocker, that prevents the 'like' button from appearing (as in, prevent facebook's javascript from being loaded).
Not only that, but just seeing the source is no guarantee. The gov't would have to inspect the source AND compile it and then use that executable. As well as examine all the various virus definition files and only use the ones they have examined. And then somehow make sure Kaspersky isn't holding back some of them and isn't intentionally using an incorrect virus def file (say one that lets through a Russian gov't virus).
Well then, they should take it away from him. Maybe also make him sit in the corner for a few weeks to think about what he did wrong.
1. It's still enabled. You can't really turn it off, short of disconnecting the computer from the internet.
2. You still don't know exactly what Microsoft is transmitting to their servers. It's just "less than before".
3. There is no limit as to what is transmitted to their servers, nor will there be any notification or approval required when they decide to increase what is being transmitted to their servers.
Sorry, your comment assumes the final decision has not already been made. It has. He is just waiting for the time limit to expire and then the "decision" will be posted.
Judges are picked based on who they know, not what they know. If you happen to get a recent appointment to the bench, you have to HOPE that they are bothering to actually learn what the law happens to be w.r.t. the current case. There is almost no money spent on training, it's just assumed that since they are a lawyer, they know everything about all aspects of the law, both criminal and civil.
EG, the judge who made the "why can't you just keep your legs together to stop him from raping you"...
Yeah, it sneaks up on you and goes "Here, have a Snickers bar." Pretty soon, everyone is too fat to move.
Trump's head is egg-shaped. Coincidence?
Statement made to children: "Daddy has to go to work now, because he has a dick payment to make. If I have to pay for it, it has to earn it's keep. Think about it kids. Not about my dick. About how I have to pay for you."
But you have a whole string of the latest buzzwords and acronyms to put on your resume for your next job!
It's what your CEO approved the project.
and they know there is fuck-all that the FBI can do about it.
The FBI won't be able to decrypt the computers and will want them for evidence, making it more time consuming and expensive to get back to work.
It's like walking around a corner and being sucker-punched by someone, and while you are on the ground, you see a cop out of the corner of your eye, you call out "Can you give me a hand up.", and the cop steps on your hand and replies "Not yet, I'm busy collecting evidence."
...now you have lost your mojo...
They probably did and are trying to charge an outrageous fee to sell the instructions.
Yes, it can. While the code itself may not be altered in public, a company running that software to provide some service could be forced to run slightly different code.
Hide in the corner of the room with a gun.